DOCSLIB.ORG

Historic Preservation: Theory and Practice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historic Preservation: Theory and Practice HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN NAPA, CALIFORNIA Kara Lynn Brunzell B.A., University of California, Los Angeles, 1988 PROJECT Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY (Public History) at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO FALL 2009 HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN NAPA, CALIFORNIA A Project by Kara Lynn Brunzell Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Lee Simpson __________________________________, Second Reader Dr. Patrick Ettinger ____________________________ Date ii Student: Kara Lynn Brunzell I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the Project. __________________________, Department Chair ________________ Dr. Christopher Castaneda Date Department of History iii Abstract of HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN NAPA, CALIFORNIA by Kara Lynn Brunzell Statement of Problem How do historic preservation activities in Napa, California relate to the theory and practice of preservation? How does Napa’s history fit into broader themes of history, and how does Napa’s historic architecture illustrate that history. Sources of Data Data sources include the printed and online literature of historic preservation, urban history, local history, and cultural resource management. The student also consulted works of local and state history, historic resource surveys and other local planning documents, and documented her experience as an intern for the City of Napa. Conclusions Reached Napa’s history and historic preservation efforts reflect broader themes of history and the evolving historic preservation movement. Emerging areas of preservation, such as historic landscapes and heritage tourism, will gain importance in Napa’s future. _______________________, Committee Chair Dr. Lee Simpson _______________________ Date iv DEDICATION To my eminently patient family, who supported and encouraged me over the last three years. They deserve no less than my permanent retirement from academic pursuits as a reward for their heroic efforts. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to all those who made this project possible. My family, Alice, Nora, Simone, Ynez, and Phil Barber, provided incalculable quantities of love, encouragement, and humor. Their support enabled me to juggle the commute, coursework, and internships required by the CSUS Public History Program. Our chaotic household was the perfect antidote for long hours of research and thesis-writing. Thank you for all your kindness and help, and for letting me monopolize the computer. My brother, David Brunzell, has been not only a source of encouragement, but an always- available information resource. Several CSUS professors contributed significantly to the knowledge and skills I built in the Public History program. Marie Nelson introduced me to historic preservation. Rand Herbert and Greg King helped me get started in Cultural Resource Management. Mona Siegel honed my writing and critical thinking. Charles Roberts and Shirley Moore encouraged me to think about history from the perspective of the dispossessed. Charles Postel provided a challenging perspective on American history. Several people in Napa also assisted me greatly. Marlene Demery, Planning Director at the City of Napa, brought me on staff to work on the local preservation program. Her high expectations allowed me to stretch my wings in this internship. I was able gain precious preservation experience by working with the Cultural Heritage Commission, writing grant applications, and assisting with surveys. The volunteer members of the vi Cultural Heritage Commission have also provided me with invaluable encouragement, technical advice, knowledge of local history, and practical help. And city staff, of course, made it all possible with their administrative support. Lee Simpson provided fundamental direction for this project, pointing me towards crucial readings and refining the scope of my research. She has generously (and quickly) responded to all my questions, and her edits and commentary were helpful. My advisor, Patrick Ettinger, has guided my path through this program with wisdom as well as wit. I would certainly not have met the fall deadline without his gentle pressure. It was he who goaded me “off the couch” in early October, insisting that I could write this paper in three weeks if I set my mind to it. His kind words, positive attitude, and incisive thinking have spurred me to improve my own thinking and writing both on this project and during the course of the Public History program. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Dedication ............................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi Chapter 1. HISTORIC PRESERVATION: THEORY AND PRACTICE ...................................1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................1 Early Preservation Efforts in the United States ....................................................1 The Birth of the Historic District ..........................................................................5 Federal Government Involvement ........................................................................7 The National Historic Preservation Act ..............................................................10 Post-NHPA Preservation ....................................................................................13 Legal Precedent ...................................................................................................15 Preservation After 1980 ......................................................................................16 Landscape, Rural, and Small-Town Preservation ...............................................16 2. HISTORY OF NAPA, CALIFORNIA .....................................................................21 Origins.................................................................................................................21 The Mexican Period ............................................................................................22 American Settlement – Gold Rush .....................................................................22 American Settlement – Agricultural Development .............................................25 viii American Consolidation and Prosperity .............................................................26 Early Twentieth Century .....................................................................................31 Prohibition and Depression .................................................................................34 World War II and the Modern Era ......................................................................36 3. REDEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION IN NAPA, CALIFORNIA ............41 The Redevelopment Era ......................................................................................41 1980 to the Present ..............................................................................................44 The Formation of Preservation Non-Profits in Napa ..........................................47 The Formation of the Cultural Heritage Commission ........................................50 Preservation Awareness in Napa ........................................................................54 Historic Context Survey ......................................................................................56 Historic Homes Workshops ................................................................................60 California Preservation Foundation Conference .................................................62 The Future of Preservation in Napa ....................................................................63 Conclusion ..........................................................................................................64 Appendix A. Grant Application, 2009 .............................................................................70 Appendix B. Publicity Material for Historic Homes Workshop.....................................77 Appendix C. Historic Homes Workshop Schedule .........................................................79 Appendix D. Historic Landscapes PowerPoint Presentation ..........................................81 Appendix E. Grant Application, 2010 ............................................................................92 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................100 ix 1 Chapter 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION: THEORY AND PRACTICE Introduction Though commemoration and public remembrance of history have been elements of American culture since the early colonial era, historic preservation as it is understood today is a relatively recent phenomenon. American preservation, restoration, and reconstruction of old buildings did not begin in earnest until the nineteenth century. The climate of patriotic nationalism that developed after the Revolutionary War led Americans to attempt to preserve sites associated with the heroes of the Revolution. Since that era, historic preservation has morphed and spread into a much broader endeavor, one that would scarcely be recognizable to the first American preservationists. One
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contemporary Architecture in Historic Environment: Bibliography
    Bibliography Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment An Annotated Bibliography Edited by Sara Lardinois, Ana Paula Arato Gonçalves, Laura Matarese, and Susan Macdonald Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment An Annotated Bibliography Edited by Sara Lardinois, Ana Paula Arato Gonçalves, Laura Matarese, and Susan Macdonald THE GETTY CONSERVATION INSTITUTE LOS ANGELES Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment: An Annotated Bibliography - Getty Conservation Institute - 2015 © 2015 J. Paul Getty Trust The Getty Conservation Institute 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90049-1684 United States Telephone 310 440-7325 Fax 310 440-7702 E-mail [email protected] www.getty.edu/conservation Copy Editor: Dianne Woo ISBN: 978-1-937433-26-0 The Getty Conservation Institute works to advance conservation practice in the visual arts, broadly interpreted to include objects, collections, architecture, and sites. It serves the conservation community through scientific research, education and training, model field projects, and the broad dissemination of the results of both its own work and the work of others in the field. And in all its endeavors, it focuses on the creation and dissemination of knowledge that will benefit professionals and organizations responsible for the conservation of the world’s cultural heritage. Front Cover: City Hall Extension, Murcia, Spain, designed by Rafael Moneo (1991–98) Photo: © Michael Moran/OTTO Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment: An Annotated Bibliography
    [Show full text]
  • Democratizing Visions of Luxury and the Good Life in California Wine Country: Wine Tourism from Repeal to the Eve of the “Wine Revolution”
    Democratizing Visions of Luxury and the Good Life in California Wine Country: Wine Tourism from Repeal to the Eve of the “Wine Revolution” Stephanie Dyer This paper describes the origins of California wine tourism in the era before the “wine revolution,” when table wine consumption begins to take off in the United State. After the repeal of Prohibition in 1933, wine tourism initially developed in response to state legal exemptions to the national three-tier system of alcohol distribution that allowed California wineries to conduct retail sales on site. Most wineries encouraged tourism primarily to educate alcohol distributors and retailers as well as consumers in order to help build the market for table wine; a few wineries developed it as a significant outlet for retail sales. The combination of activities now considered standard elements in the wine tourism industry – touring wineries, tasting their products, and purchasing them on site – first emerged at Charles Krug winery in 1950. These practices were encouraged by the Wine Institute and adapted industry wide by 1962, the year table wine consumption began to dominate the California wine market. My goal in this project is to understand the evolution of California wine tourism from its origins as a minor part of wine industry promotion in the wake of Prohibition’s repeal into an increasingly important retail sector in its own right by the late 20th century. Wine is one of those rare global commodities whose production remains tied to particular locations, making it a natural fit for tourism. To quote a standard wine industry textbook on the subject: “tourism is fundamentally about the difference of place, while wine is one Stephanie Dyer <[email protected]> is an associate professor of American History and Political Economy at Sonoma State University, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial and Warehouse Buildings Study Report
    REPORT ON CITY OF SYDNEY INDUSTRIAL & WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS HERITAGE STUDY FOR THE CITY OF SYDNEY OCTOBER 2014 FINAL VOLUME 1 Eveready batteries, 1937 (Source: Source: SLNSW hood_08774h) Joseph Lucas, (Aust.) Pty Ltd Shea's Creek 2013 (Source: City Plan Heritage) (Source: Building: Light Engineering, Dec 24 1955) VOLUME 1 CITY OF SYDNEY INDUSTRIAL & WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS HERITAGE STUDY FINAL REPORT Job No/ Description Prepared By/ Reviewed by Approved by Document of Issue Date Project Director No Manager/Director FS & KD 13-070 Draft 22/01/2014 KD/24/01/2014 13-070 Final Draft KD/17/04/2014 KD/22/04/2014 13-070 Final Draft 2 KD/13/06/2014 KD/16/06/2014 13-070 Final KD/03/09/2014 KD/05/09/2014 13-070 Final 2 KD/13/10/2014 KD/13/10/2014 Name: Kerime Danis Date: 13/10/2014 Note: This document is preliminary unless it is approved by the Director of City Plan Heritage CITY PLAN HERITAGE FINAL 1 OCTOBER 2014 / H-13070 VOLUME 1 CITY OF SYDNEY INDUSTRIAL & WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS HERITAGE STUDY FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 – REPORT Executive summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.0 About this study................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Purpose .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TO-KALON VINEYARD HALS CA-139 (To Kalon) HALS CA-139 (Tokalon) 1350 Walnut Drive Oakville Napa County California
    TO-KALON VINEYARD HALS CA-139 (To Kalon) HALS CA-139 (ToKalon) 1350 Walnut Drive Oakville Napa County California WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240 HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY TO-KALON VINEYARD (To Kalon, ToKalon) HALS No. CA-139 Location: 1350 Walnut Drive, Oakville, Napa County, California. During the primary period of historical significance the To-Kalon Vineyard encompassed approximately 500 acres. The boundaries included all vineyard land west of State Highway 29 bordered by the base of the Mayacamas Mountains to the east, its southern edge being the Oakville Grade Road and northern boundary at the division between the Oakville and Rutherford American Viticultural Areas.1 In 1944, additional To-Kalon Vineyard acreage was annexed by then owner Martin Stelling Jr. His purchase of the adjoining Doak/McGill Ranch extended To-Kalon south of the Oakville Grade Road and To-Kalon Creek into a portion of the historic Far Niente Winery. The present day extension is bordered on the east by State Highway 29 and the south by Dwyer Road. The western boundary follows Stelling Creek, which originates in the Halter Valley watershed and excludes the UC Davis South Vineyard, 1250 Oakville Grade Road and Far Niente properties. Today, To-Kalon gross parcel size measures 825 acres of which approximately 678 are planted to vineyard. Latitude: 38.433675, Longitude: -122.412807 (Google Earth, WGS84) Present Owners: Robert Mondavi Winery University of California, Davis Opus One Winery Wilsey/Traina Beckstoffer Vineyards Mehran Garrett/Cover (Detert Family Vineyards) Napa Valley Grape Growers Horton (MACDONALD) Giovanni Present Use: Vineyard, wineries and residences.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Politics in Adelaide
    Welcome to the electronic edition of Heritage Politics in Adelaide. The book opens with the bookmark panel and you will see the contents page. Click on this anytime to return to the contents. You can also add your own bookmarks. Each chapter heading in the contents table is clickable and will take you direct to the chapter. Return using the contents link in the bookmarks. The whole document is fully searchable. Enjoy. Heritage Politics in Adelaide For David and for all the other members of Aurora Heritage Action, Inc. Explorations and Encounters in FRENCH Heritage Politics EDITED BY JEAN FOinRNASIERO Adelaide AND COLETTE MROWa-HopkiNS Sharon Mosler Selected Essays from the Inaugural Conference of the Federation of Associations of Teachers of French in Australia Published in Adelaide by University of Adelaide Press Barr Smith Library The University of Adelaide South Australia 5005 [email protected] www.adelaide.edu.au/press The University of Adelaide Press publishes externally refereed scholarly books by staff of the University of Adelaide. It aims to maximise the accessibility to its best research by publishing works through the internet as free downloads and as high quality printed volumes on demand. Electronic Index: this book is available from the website as a down-loadable PDF with fully searchable text. Please use the electronic version to complement the index. © 2011 Sharon Mosler This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • How the North Bay's Wine Country Has Changed Since Its Early Days
    How the North Bay’s Wine Country has changed since its early days By Jane Hodges Young hen the first issue of Sonoma (again), and it would be six years before bested all French competitors in the now- Business hit the newsstands the San Francisco 49ers were on anyone’s famous “Judgment of Paris” wine tasting. in 1976, California’s wine radar screen. The contest was a game changer for industry was just starting to And wine? Well, fine wine was made California wine and the epicenter for the Wtake off. Undeniably, life was different in France. Or so everyone thought, until revolution was—and pretty much still then. Richard Nixon had been out of office one year later, when two Napa Valley is—the North Bay counties of Napa and for only a few months, the Vietnam War wineries—Chateau Montelena (using Sonoma. What was it like? Queue Barbra finally ended with the fall of Saigon, the Chardonnay grapes grown in Sonoma Streisand, and let’s take a look at “The Way Boston Red Sox were World Series losers County) and Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars— We Were.” 1 Northbaybiz March 2015 Charles Krug Winery’s redwood cellar in 1940 [Photo courtesy of Charles Krug Winery] March 2015 Northbaybiz 2 The standard-bearers One cannot imagine wine as we know it without the contributions of two pioneering North Bay wine families: the Mondavis and Sebastianis. And while the family sagas of both are reminiscent of “Falcon Crest” (the primetime television soap opera about California wine families that aired weekly from 1981 to 1990) they remain winners and continue to be standard-bearers for the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Delirious Facade
    BLACK BOX: Articulating Architecture’s Core in the Post-Digital Era 1 DELIRIOUS FACADE WEI-HAN VIVIAN LEE JAMES MACGILLIVRAY University of Toronto that had developed earlier in the composition of the plan and section. The generative nature of this relationship between This paper looks at a recent developments in digital knowledge and design towards what the authors interior and exterior, coupled with the relative stability of call “raster” based surfaces and away from “vector” lineaments. The authors present this turn in ornamental and formal languages meant that facade com- relation to the historical context of facade composition, drawing an analogy between the beaux-arts position was circumscribed. understanding of facades as a consequence of plan and section and the auditable and verifiable scripts of parametric design. In contrast to the vector, the authors present contemporary developments Yet, with the advent of reinforced concrete and the cantile- in machine learning and perception that privilege an interaction with the world based on surfaces vered floor slab, the causal connection between the facade and pixels. Lastly they present the potential for the raster digital as a design tool, using artificial and the elevation was largely severed. There are other exam- intelligence to synthesize hybrid facade designs in a digital dream state. ples, but Le Corbusier’s free facade is the most emblematic.5 The free facade instigated a crisis in what had otherwise BACKGROUND been a logical conclusion to the procedure of architectural Forest and city are two things essentially deep, and depth composition. Indeed counter to the easy sounding name, the is fatally condemned to become a surface if it wants to free facade actually requires more compositional work; Le be visible… The part of the forest immediately before Corbusier’s invention of the concept of “regulating lines” and us is a screen as it were, behind which the rest of it lies his use of the facade diagram in Towards a New Architecture hidden and aloof.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping of Current Heritage Re-Use Policies and Regulations in Europe
    Ref. Ares(2019)7896005 - 23/12/2019 OpenHeritage: Deliverable 1.2 (Report) Mapping of current heritage re-use policies and regulations in Europe Complex policy overview of adaptive heritage re-use December 2019 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776766 H2020 PROJECT Grant Agreement No 776766 Project Full Organizing, Promoting and Enabling Heritage Re-use through Title Inclusion, Technology, Access, Governance and Empowerment Project OpenHeritage Acronym Grant 776766 Agreement No. Coordinator Metropolitan Research Institute (MRI) Project June 2018 – May 2021 (48 months) duration Project website www.openheritage.eu WP1: Mapping of current heritage re-use policies and Work Package regulations in Europe 1.2 report Complex policy overview of adaptive heritage re-use Deliverable (synthetizes inputs from Tasks 1.1.- 1.3) Delivery Date December 2019 Loes Veldpaus (UNEW); Federica Fava (ROMA3); Dominika Author(s) Brodowicz (SARP) Dóra Mérai (CEU); Nicola Vazzoler, Giovanni Caudo, Mauro Baioni (Roma3); Markus Kip (UBER); Katarzyna Sadowy, (SARP); Iryna Sklokina, Sofia Dyak (CUH); Karim van Contributor(s) Knippenberg (UGENT); John Pendlebury, Sarah Dyer, Hannah Garrow, Bruce Davenport (UNEW); Joep de Roo, Alina Cristiana Tomescu (Eurodite). Reviewer(s) Beitske Boonstra (UGENT) Dissemination Public (PU) X level: Confidential, only for members of the consortium (CO) This document has been prepared in the framework of the European project OpenHeritage – Organizing, Promoting and Enabling Heritage Re-use through Inclusion, Technology, Access, Governance and Empowerment. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776766.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Office the Bancroft Library University of California Berkeley, California the Wine Spectator California Wi
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California The Wine Spectator California Winemen Oral History Series Peter Mondavi ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTION AT CHARLES KRUG WINERY, 1946-1988 With an Introduction by Joseph Heitz An Interview Conducted by Ruth Teiser in 1988 Copyright @ 1990 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the Nation. Oral history is a modern research technique involving an interviewee and an informed interviewer in spontaneous conversation. The taped record is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The resulting manuscript is typed in final form, indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between the University of California and Peter Mondavi dated Februrary 1, 1990. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • ^L^^Ml^Mi^^^^^MM COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY of DEEDS, ETC: Napa County Recorders Office, Registry of Deeds STREET and NUMBER: Hall of Records CITY OR TOWN
    / STATE: Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Rev. 6-72) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE California COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Napa INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY DATE (Type all entries complete applicable sections) ITO? 8 1971 COMMON: /CharlesiKrugJwinery L————————————-——-/. -V————————*——————————— AND/ OR HISTORIC: Charles Krug Winery STREET AND,NUMBER: St. Helena Highway CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: St. Helena First STATE COUNTY: California 06 Napa 28 CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC District Q Building CD Public Public Acquisition: C!) Occupied Yes: CD Restricted Site Q Structure Private || In Process 1rn _| UnoccupiedII • j S Unrestricted D Object |~~] Both | | Being Considered r-ji —i Preservationr> . work, *^ in progress ' — ' PRESENT USE- (Check One or More as Appropriate) CD Agricultural | | Government ^| Park •g Commercial CD Industrial fj Private Residence CD Educational CD Mi itary [ | Religious Q Entertainment CD Museum | | Scientific • OWNER'S NAME: C. Mondavi and Sons STREET AND NUMBER: St. Helena Highway CITY OR TOWN: St. Helena California ^l^^Ml^Mi^^^^^MM COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Napa County Recorders Office, Registry of Deeds STREET AND NUMBER: Hall of Records CITY OR TOWN: Napa California 06 TITLE OF SURVEY: California State Historical Landmark #563 DATE OF SURVEY: Qct . 3, 1956 D Federal State fj County Loco DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: California State Department of Parks and Recreation STREET AND NUMBER: oc 1416 9th Street CITY OR TOWN: Sacramento California 06 (Check One) CD Excellent Good D \ I Deteriorated CD Ruins II Unexposed CONDITION (Check One) (Check One) Altered CD Unaltered CD Moved ^3 Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL, (if known) PHYSICAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Office the Bancroft Library University of California Berkeley, California the Nine Spectator California Wi
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California The Nine Spectator California Winemen Oral History Series Robert Mondavi CREATIVITY IN THF. CALIFORNIA WINE INDUSTRY With an Introduction by Maynard A. Amerine An Interview Conducted by Ruth Teiser in 1984 Copyright @ 1985 by The Regents of the University of California All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal- agreement between the University of California and Robert Mondavi dated May 21, 1985. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California at Berkeley. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to the Regional Oral History Office, 486 Library, and shouldinclude identification of the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the passages, and identification of the user. The legal agreement with Robert Mondavi requires that he be notified of the request and allowed thirty days in which to respond. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: Robert Mondavi, "Creativity in the California Wine Industry," an oral history conducted 1984 by Ruth Teiser, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1985. Copy No. TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 14.3 Fall 1999
    Conservation TH P O L I CY E GY NUMENTS I TES E T H C S NS I O 999 NT 1 M 3 ERN S I L TECTUREIO ATIO N I E NAL S VES C , Number E DUCAT N O 14 IO O RGANI I I ZATIONS I I ARCH olume V LLECT TH O EN AT C EF I CHN BRAR ARCH R T I TT L I TE Cons ST The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter REPA e nnium er vation T O URI SM at the Mill The Getty The J. Paul Getty Trust Barry Munitz President and Chief Executive Officer Conservation Stephen D. Rountree Executive Vice President Institute Newsletter The Getty Conservation Institute Timothy P. Whalen Director Jeanne Marie Teutonico Special Advisor to the Director Volume 14 , Number 3 1999 Group Directors Kathleen Gaines Administration Giora Solar Field Projects Alberto de Tagle Science Marta de la Torre Information & Communications Jane Siena Talley Head, Institutional Relations Conservation, The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter Jeffrey Levin Editor Joe Molloy Design Consultant Helen Mauchí Graphic Designer Westland Graphics Lithography The Getty Conservation Institute works internationally to advance conservation practice in the visual arts—broadly interpreted to include objects, collections, architecture, and sites. The Institute serves the conservation community through four areas of activity: scientific research into the nature, decay, and treatment of materi- als; education and training; model field projects; and the dissemi- nation of information through traditional publications and electronic means. In all its endeavors, the GCI is committed to addressing unanswered questions and promoting the highest possi- ble standards of conservation.
    [Show full text]