EXOCET AM39 Is the Airborne Version of the EXOCET Anti-Ship Missile Family

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

EXOCET AM39 is the airborne version of the EXOCET anti-ship missile family. EXOCET AM39 can be launched from strike aircraft, Maritime exocet am39 Patrol Aircraft and helicopters. air launched anti-ship missile With a range of up to 70 km, depending on the altitude and speed of the aircraft, the EXOCET AM39 enables the aircraft to remain at range from enemy air defences. When carrying out a low altitude attack, the missile may also be launched under the target ship radar coverage. Ingress is at a very low altitude over the sea (sea skimming). In service with the French Navy on its Rafale, Super-Etendard and Atlantic • Fire and Forget aircraft ATL 2 as well as with several export countries. • Launched from combat aircraft, Maritime Patrol Aircraft and helicopters EXOCET AM39 has been extensively used in combat in various • Range in excess of 70 km operational theatres. • In service with the French Navy and 11 foreign forces MBDA Contacts Sales and Business Development 1 avenue Réaumur 92358 Le Plessis-Robinson cedex - France Tel. + 33 (0) 1 71 54 10 00 Fax + 33 (0) 1 71 54 00 01 [email protected] SEA www.mbda-systems.com Integration Name • 14 aircraft types • EXOCET AM39 Block2 mod2 • Ejection launch Missile characteristics Propulsion • Weight: 670 kg • 2 solid-propellant rockets (booster and sustainer) • Length: 4.69 m • Diameter: 350 mm Navigation • Speed: high subsonic • Inertial navigation during cruise phase • Radio altimeter Terminal guidance • Fire and Forget • Active RF homing Maximum Range • Up to 70 km depending on launch altitude and speed Steering • Aerodynamic control surfaces Warhead • Insensitive warhead • Optimised HE blast and pre-fragmented effects • Impact fuze and proximity function © MBDA - FR 2015-01-v.001 Photo Credits: MBDA, Thierry Wurtz, DGA-CEV.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

CRUISE MISSILE THREAT Volume 2: Emerging Cruise Missile Threat
By Systems Assessment Group NDIA Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Committee August 1999 FEASIBILITY OF THIRD WORLD ADVANCED BALLISTIC AND CRUISE MISSILE THREAT Volume 2: Emerging Cruise Missile Threat The Systems Assessment Group of the National Defense Industrial Association ( NDIA) Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Committee performed this study as a continuing examination of feasible Third World missile threats. Volume 1 provided an assessment of the feasibility of the long range ballistic missile threats (released by NDIA in October 1998). Volume 2 uses aerospace industry judgments and experience to assess Third World cruise missile acquisition and development that is “emerging” as a real capability now. The analyses performed by industry under the broad title of “Feasibility of Third World Advanced Ballistic & Cruise Missile Threat” incorporate information only from unclassified sources. Commercial GPS navigation instruments, compact avionics, flight programming software, and powerful, light-weight jet propulsion systems provide the tools needed for a Third World country to upgrade short-range anti-ship cruise missiles or to produce new land-attack cruise missiles (LACMs) today. This study focuses on the question of feasibility of likely production methods rather than relying on traditional intelligence based primarily upon observed data. Published evidence of technology and weapons exports bears witness to the failure of international agreements to curtail cruise missile proliferation. The study recognizes the role LACMs developed by Third World countries will play in conjunction with other new weapons, for regional force projection. LACMs are an “emerging” threat with immediate and dire implications for U.S. freedom of action in many regions .
[Show full text]
Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J
Secretary of the Air Force Janies F. McGovern Air Force Chief of Staff Gen Larry D. Welch Commander, Air University Lt Gen Ralph Lv Havens Commander, Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education Col Sidney J. Wise Editor Col Keith W. Geiger Associate Editor Maj Michael A. Kirtland Professional Staff Hugh Richardson. Contributing Editor Marvin W. Bassett. Contributing Editor John A. Westcott, Art Director and Production Mu linger Steven C. Garst. Art Editor and Illustrator The Airpower Journal, published quarterly, is the professional journal of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open forum for presenting and stimulating innovative thinking on military doctrine, strategy, tactics, force structure, readiness, and other national defense matters. The views and opinions ex- pressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as car- rying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, the Air Force, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If repro- duced, the Airpower Journal requests a cour- tesy line. JOURNAL SPRING 1989. Vol. Ill, No. I AFRP 50 2 Editorial 2 Air Interdiction Col Clifford R. Kxieger, USAF 4 Operation Nickel Grass: Airlift in Support of National Policy Capt Chris J. Krisinger, USAF 16 Paradox of the Headless Horseman Lt Col Joe Boyles, USAF Capt Greg K. Mittelman, USAF 29 A Rare Feeling of Satisfaction Maj Michael A. Kirtland, USAF 34 Weaseling in the BUFF Col A. Lee Harrell, USAF 36 Thinking About Air Power Maj Andrew J.
[Show full text]
French : the Most Practical Foreign Language
French : The Most Practical Foreign Language While any language will be useful for some jobs or for some regions, French is the only foreign language that can be useful throughout the world as well as in the United States. French as a foreign language is the second most frequently taught language in the world after English. The International Organization of Francophonie has 51 member states and governments. Of these, 28 countries have French as an official language. French is the only language other than English spoken on five continents. French and English are the only two global languages. When deciding on a foreign language for work or school, consider that French is the language that will give you the most choices later on in your studies or your career. French, along with English, is the official working language of ● the United Nations ● UNESCO ● NATO ● Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) ● the International Labor Bureau ● the International Olympic Committee ● the 31-member Council of Europe ● the European Community ● the Universal Postal Union ● the International Red Cross ● Union of International Associations (UIA) French is the dominant working language at ● the European Court of Justice ● the European Tribunal of First Instance ● the European Court of Auditors in Luxembourg. ● the Press Room at the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium One example of the importance of French can be seen in a recent listing of international jobs (8/29/06) distributed by the US State Department: 135 required or preferred French, 49 Spanish, 25 a UN language (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish), 6 Arabic, 6 Russian, 2 German, 2 Italian , and Chinese 2.
[Show full text]
ALERT a System to Provide Advanced Warning of an Anti-Ship Missile Attack
UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED Acoustic Littoral Engagement Response to Threats – ALERT A System to Provide Advanced Warning of an Anti-Ship Missile Attack Duane C. Tate Georgia Tech Research Institute Sensors and Electromagnetic Applications Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0800 [email protected] ABSTRACT Naval warfare is shifting from an almost exclusive deep water, open ocean engagement to a littoral environment where high-value surface ships are forced to operate in close proximity to land, exposing those ships to a new, significant threat - the high speed, sea skimming missile launched from coastal defenses, mobile land launchers, and patrol craft and maritime aircraft operating close to shore. This is a formidable threat. The anti-ship missile is a low radar signature target, making it difficult to detect in any environment. As a sea-skimmer, the missile trajectory is low on the radar's scan area, and in a high clutter region, adding to the detection difficulty. However, in this case, the clutter is magnified by the land background. With missile speeds in excess of ¾ Mach, there is precious little time between detection and missile impact in which to engage this threat. The Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) at the Georgia Institute of Technology has investigated a concept to provide early detection of these sea-skimming missiles and add additional response time for the surface ship. The Acoustic Littoral Engagement Response to Threats (ALERT) system employs an underwater vertical transducer array to detect airborne acoustic noise from the missile that penetrates the air-water boundary. The system capitalizes on the 6 dB signal enhancement due to the pressure-doubling effect at the air-water boundary to improve detectability of the signal, plus the factor of five increase in sound speed in water versus air to reduce detection time.
[Show full text]
Countersea Operations
COUNTERSEA OPERATIONS Air Force Doctrine Document 2-1.4 15 September 2005 This document complements related discussion found in Joint Publication 3-30, Command and Control for Joint Air Operations. BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE DOCTRINE DOCUMENT 2-1.4 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 15 SEPTEMBER 2005 SUMMARY OF REVISIONS This document is substantially revised. This revision’s overarching changes are new chapter headings and sections, terminology progression to “air and space” from “aerospace,” expanded discussion on planning and employment factors, operational considerations when conducting countersea operations, and effects-based methodology and the emphasis on operations vice capabilities or platforms. Specific changes with this revision are the additions of the naval warfighter’s perspective to enhance understanding the environment, doctrine, and operations of the maritime forces on page 3; comparison between Air Force and Navy/Marine Corp terminology, on page 7, included to ensure Air Force forces are aware of the difference in terms or semantics; a terminology matrix added to simplify that awareness on page 9; amphibious operations organization, command and control, and planning are also included throughout the document. Supersedes: AFDD 2-1.4, 4 June 1999 OPR: HQ AFDC/DS (Lt Col Richard Hughey) Certified by: AFDC/DR (Lt Col Eric Schnitzer) Pages: 66 Distribution: F Approved by: Bentley B. Rayburn, Major General, USAF Commander, Headquarters Air Force Doctrine Center FOREWORD Countersea Operations are about the use of Air Force capabilities in the maritime environment to accomplish the joint force commander’s objectives. This doctrine supports DOD Directive 5100.1 requirements for surface sea surveillance, anti-air warfare, anti-surface ship warfare, and anti-submarine warfare.
[Show full text]
Ausa Background Brief Iraq Today- a Perspective
AUSA BACKGROUND BRIEF IRAQ TODAY- A PERSPECTIVE No. 25 September 1990 The Country Iraq is a virtually landlocked Middle East country bordered by Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Kuwait. It has a population of 17.8 million divided mostly between Arabs (75 percent) and Kurds (15 percent). The population is 95 percent Muslim and is fairly well educated (70 percent literacy rate). Iraq possesses about one-third of Middle East oil reserves, has ample water to meet minimum population needs, and has limited agricultural capability to meet some domestic food requirements (70 percent of food is imported). Because of the drain caused by the eight-year war with Iran and low oil prices, Iraq has accumulated about $80 billion in foreign debts; inflation is running at about 40 percent. Iraq spends about 40 percent of its GNP on defense. Its Leader The so-called "Father-Leader" of Iraq is Saddam Hussein At-Takriti, a minority Sunni Muslim who has gained a reputation as an audacious, ruthless ruler who quickly suppresses any potential threats to his position. He took over the leadership of the governing Ba'th Party in 1979. ( His first act was to arrange for the execution of 21 cabinet members, including one of his closest associates. In 1988, he used poison gas on the Kurdish town of Halabja, killing thousands of defenseless villagers. Saddam Hussein declared that " ... they collaborated against their own country." He showed no hesitancy in using missiles against the cities of Iran during that long war. The record is replete with examples that authenticate his total disregard for human life.
[Show full text]
The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles
The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles Product Code #F658 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Missile Forecast Analysis 3 The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles 2010-2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................3 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................5 Competitive Environment.......................................................................................................................................6 Market Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................9 Table 1 - The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019 ................................................15 Table 2 - The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019.................................................20 Figure 1 - The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles Unit Production 2010 - 2019 (Bar Graph) ...............................................................................25 Figure 2 - The Market for Anti-Ship Missiles
[Show full text]
Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
-- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
[Show full text]
Anti-Ship Missiles Market Outlook and Programme Review
INDUSTRY & MARKETS. Anti-Ship Missiles Market Outlook and Programme Review Bob Nugent The global naval market for anti-ship missiles has entered a transition phase as established market leaders such as Boeing's HARPOON and MBDA's EXOCET compete against a growing number of increasingly capa ble,lethal, and inexpensive rivals offered from the US, Europe, China, and Russia. This article reviews the current and future prospects for naval ASuW missile in the global market. hese traditional offerors are joined by � companies and countries such as India � Tand Korea that have developed local ASuW i!: missiles and bring them to the market with alternative supply chains, fewer export re strictions, and favourable trade terms. The ASuW market is influenced by three strategic trends that are reshaping naval force structures. The first is the overall re duction in naval ships and submarines in service, a result of the continuing retire ment of ships that were brought into ser The EXOCET MM40 Block 3 vice during the Cold War or in the decade after. Those ships are now reaching 30, 40 creasing the market opportunity for ASuW also driving a renewed focus on offensive and in some cases 50 years of service and missile suppliers, and increasing the likeli naval warfare at sea. The US Navy's Offen are in large part incapable of serving much hood that ASuW missiles will be used in sive Missile Strategy that shapes research longer. With fewer ships in service, naval active operations. and development and procurement poli planners will be pressed to decide which Lastly, technology has fundamentally cies for ASuW missiles is one example of of those fewer ships will be equipped with changed the conditions and constraints of this phenomenon.
[Show full text]
Strategic Contours of China's Arms Transfers
STRATEGIC STUDIES QUARTERLY - PERSPECTIVE Strategic Contours of China’s Arms Transfers MICHAEL RASKA RICHARD A. BITZINGER Abstract Over the past two decades, China has gone from being a significant importer of conventional arms to being an increasingly competitive ex- porter of major weapons systems. Its increasing presence on global arms markets reflects the relative progress of Chinese defense, science, tech- nology, innovation, and industry in terms of developing and manufactur- ing relatively advanced military platforms and technologies. China aims for relative parity with the global military-technological state- of- the- art base by fostering indigenous innovation—mitigating foreign dependen- cies on technological transfers and arms imports—while leveraging civil- military integration to overcome entrenched barriers to innovation. At the same time, China’s current arms export strategy reflects varying “competi- tive” paths. In the developing countries of Latin America, Africa, and even Central Asia, China is trying to position itself as an alternative to Russian arms exports while also counterbalancing the influence of Western pow- ers. Consequently, China has a growing capability to shape the direction and character of the varying regional arms competitions—not only through its military- technological development and diffusion of arms ex- ports but, more importantly, through its strategic choices that influence the development of strategic alliances and balance of power in different geographic areas. ***** hina’s rising global geopolitical aspirations—backed up by grow- ing economic clout—shape the direction and character of its military- technological choices, including its strategic interests to Cstrengthen its position on global arms markets. Since 2010, China has been able to accelerate its transition from a large arms importer into a net exporter, with the potential to become one of the world’s leading arms exporters.
[Show full text]
Appendix 13C. Register of the Transfers and Licensed Production of Major Conventional Weapons, 2002
Appendix 13C. Register of the transfers and licensed production of major conventional weapons, 2002 BJÖRN HAGELIN, PIETER D. WEZEMAN, SIEMON T. WEZEMAN and NICHOLAS CHIPPERFIELD The register in table 13C.1 lists major weapons on order or under delivery, or for which the licence was bought and production was under way or completed during 2002. Sources and methods for data collection are explained in appendix 13D. Entries in table 13C.1 are alphabetical, by recipient, supplier and licenser. ‘Year(s) of deliveries’ includes aggregates of all deliveries and licensed production since the beginning of the contract. ‘Deal worth’ values in the Comments column refer to real monetary values as reported in sources and not to SIPRI trend-indicator values. Conventions, abbreviations and acronyms are explained below the table. For cross-reference, an index of recipients and licensees for each supplier can be found in table 13C.2. Table 13C.1. Register of transfers and licensed production of major conventional weapons, 2002, by recipients Recipient/ Year Year(s) No. supplier (S) No. Weapon Weapon of order/ of delivered/ or licenser (L) ordered designation description licence deliveries produced Comments Afghanistan S: Russia 1 An-12/Cub-A Transport aircraft (2002) 2002 (1) Ex-Russian; aid (5) Mi-24D/Mi-25/Hind-D Combat helicopter (2002) 2002 (5) Ex-Russian; aid (10) Mi-8T/Hip-C Helicopter (2002) 2002 (3) Ex-Russian; aid; delivery 2002–2003 (200) AT-4 Spigot/9M111 Anti-tank missile (2002) . Ex-Russian; aid Albania S: Italy (1) Bell-206/AB-206 Light helicopter
[Show full text]
Anti-Ship Missiles
Make in India Paradigm Roadmap for a Future Ready Naval Force 18th-19th April 2016 COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE MBDA in INDIA • MBDA is an industry leader and a global player in the missile and missile systems sector • MBDA is Number 1 in Europe and one of the worldwide leaders, thanks to its wide market coverage and customer base • MBDA has been working with India for over 50 years • Thanks to an unrivalled product portfolio covering the whole range of land, maritime and airborne requirements, MBDA is working with the 3 Indian Armed forces Page - Référence : COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE This: document and the information contained herein is proprietary information of MBDA France and shall not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior authorisation of MBDA France. Copyright © MBDA France 2016 INDIAN NAVY • Magic 1 and LR 155 on Sea Harrier • Sea Eagle on Sea Harrier and Sea King • Magic 2 on Sea Harrier • Exocet SM39 on Scorpene submarines • SRSAM selected for Navy • Exocet AM39 proposed for MRMR and H225 M NMRH Page - Référence : COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE This: document and the information contained herein is proprietary information of MBDA France and shall not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior authorisation of MBDA France. Copyright © MBDA France 2016 MBDA helicopter launched anti-ship missiles MBDA has an extensive anti-ship weapon system capabilities for helicopter platforms: • Heavy weight antiship missile with the Exocet AM39 • Medium weight antiship missile with the Marte ER and MK2/S • Light weight antiship missile with the Sea Venom Page - Référence : COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE This: document and the information contained herein is proprietary information of MBDA France and shall not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior authorisation of MBDA France.
[Show full text]