Charged-Coupled Detector Sky Surveys DONALD P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charged-Coupled Detector Sky Surveys DONALD P Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 90, pp. 9751-9753, November 1993 Colloquium Paper This paper was presented at a colloquium entitled "Images of Science: Science ofImages," organized by Albert V. Crewe, held January 13 and 14, 1992, at the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. Charged-coupled detector sky surveys DONALD P. SCHNEIDER Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540 ABSTRACT Sky surveys have played a fundamental role in years to prepare the equipment, years to acquire and cali- advancing our understanding of the cosmos. The current pic- brate the observations, and years to analyze the results-an tures of stellar evolution and structure and kinematics of our image that is in fact not far from the truth. This type of Galaxy were made possible by the extensive photographic and research rarely generates the excitement (professional or spectrographic programs performed in the early part ofthe 20th public) that accompanies many of the heralded discoveries century. The Palomar Sky Survey, completed in the 1950s, is still (e.g., pulsars or gravitational lenses), but it is unusual indeed the principal source for many investigations. In the past few for these breakthroughs not to have been based, at least in decades surveys have been undertaken at radio, millimeter, part, on the data base provided by previous surveys. It should infrared, and x-ray wavelengths; each has provided insights into also be noted that every time an astronomical survey has new astronomical phenomena (e.g., quasars, pulsars, and the 3° been undertaken in an unexplored wavelength band (e.g., cosmic background radiation). The advent of high quantum radio, x-ray), startling discoveries have followed. efficiency, linear solid-state devices, in particular charged- Astronomy owes a special debt to surveys; many of the coupled detectors, has brought about a revolution in optical most fundamental advances in the past century were made astronomy. With the recent development of large-format possible by the existence of accurate catalogs of the posi- charged-coupled detectors and the rapidly increasing capabili- tions, brightnesses, colors, motions, etc., ofcelestial objects. ties ofdata acquisition and processing systems, it is now feasible Table 1 presents a partial listing of large astronomical sur- to employ the full capabilities of electronic detectors in projects veys, the date they were performed, the wavelength band of that cover an appreciable fraction of the sky. This talk reviews the survey, and a sample of the important discoveries based the first "large scale" charged-coupled detector survey. This on the work. Occasionally the advances came only when program, designed to detect very distant quasars, reveals the information from two surveys were combined; quasars is a powers and limitations of charged-coupled detector surveys. classic example. This paper confines itselfto a discussion ofoptical surveys. It is fitting to open this conference with an overview of the Although optical surveys are the oldest (and until the last 50 oldest of the sciences, astronomy. This field has been at the years the only) type of astronomical survey, recent techno- forefront of image analysis for millennia, from the earliest logical advances have revolutionized our ability to perform paintings and star charts through the incredible electronic large-scale (covering an appreciable fraction of the sky) visions of the planets provided by spacecraft. Astronomy is surveys with high-efficiency solid-state detectors. also the purest (or the most primitive, depending on one's point of view) science in its form of image acquisition. Survey Efficiencies Although we have a large variety of instrumentation at our disposal, one cannot call observational astronomy an exper- Before we enter into a discussion of current and future imental science; we but passively record images of the astronomical surveys, it is desirable to develop a quantitative heavens, for we cannot manipulate the objects of interest. figure ofmerit, a relation that allows an objective comparison The goal ofthis presentation is to convey the excitement of of a range of instrumentation and observational techniques. what I call the third electronics revolution in optical astron- A simple expression for the efficiency of a given survey is: omy. The first occurred about half a century ago, when the linear response and high sensitivities ofphotomultiplier tubes Survey efficiency = D2 Qi q f, dramatically improved the accuracy of many astronomical measurements. The two-dimensional detectors of the 1970s, where De is the effective collecting diameter ofthe instrument such as silicon intensified targets and charged-coupled de- (in the case ofoptical astronomy, the diameter ofthe primary tectors (CCDs), allowed pictures of small areas of the sky to mirror), Ql is the solid angle of the field of view, q is the be taken with linear high-quantum-efficiency devices. I be- system quantum efficiency, and f is the fraction of the time lieve that the next decade will witness another quantum leap. that survey data can be acquired (1). In this paper the units This advance will not be driven by breakthroughs in detector of system efficiency will be expressed in m2-deg2. technology but will occur because data-processing capabili- The last factor,f, may seem superfluous (it is obvious that ties will permit the undertaking of large-scale surveys with the efficiency goes as the fraction of the time the shutter is electronic detectors. open; one should simply survey all ofthe time) but is actually quite important in distinguishing differences between what at Importance of Surveys in Astronomy first appear to be surveys with similar efficiencies. Without the final factor, one would assume that doubling the collect- When one thinks of large scientific survey projects, one ing area and halving the field of view will result in no change visualizes a large team of scientists and engineers laboring in survey efficiency, but this is in general not true. If one wants to survey an area to given flux limit, the exposure time The publication costs ofthis article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" Abbreviations: CCD, charge-coupled detector; deg, degree; SDSS, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. Sloan digital sky survey. 9751 Downloaded by guest on October 3, 2021 9752 Colloquium Paper: Schneider Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993) Table 1. Astronomical surveys Survey Wavelength, ,um Date Scientific results Henry Draper 1920s Stellar evolution (spectroscopy) 0.5 Galactic structure Astrometric (stellar positions) Galactic kinematics Harvard Sky Patrol 0.5 1920s Variable stars Palomar Sky Survey 0.5 1950s Quasars, clusters of galaxies Radio (3C, etc.) 1i0 1950s Quasars, pulsars, HI gas Superluminal motion X-rays 0.001 1970s-80s Hot gas in clusters Compact objects IRAS 30 1980s Infrared cirrus, star formation Luminous IR galaxies/quasars COBE 1000 1980s-90s Shape of 30 background Deviations from isotropy IRAS, Infrared Astronomical Satellite; COBE, Cosmic Background Explorer. on both telescopes is the same, but one must take 4 times as camera/spectrograph (2), completed in 1984, which contains many "pictures" with the larger telescope, and each image four 800 x 800 Texas Instruments CCDs in a two-by-two has an associated overhead caused by prepping and reading mosaic. (iii) The technique of continuous scanning CCDs of the detectors. (In some cases this "dead time" can be (running in time-delay-and-integrate mode) was developed. avoided; see the next section.) The final factor also incor- This process takes advantage of the geometry of the CCD porates site-dependent effects (e.g., the fraction of the time readout mechanism. To measure the accumulated signal in lost to clouds at an observatory; the fraction of the orbit each pixel on the device, the charge is shifted row by row during which a satellite can acquire data on the field). Since down the CCD to the readout amplifier. By having the sky this paper wants to emphasize the technological aspects of move across the CCD at the same rate as the electrons are surveys, we will only consider the impact of the instrumen- being shifted through the detector (each individual object tation's properties in the estimate of f. This definition of stays with the same packet of charge), one eliminates the survey efficiency omits details ofthe detectorproperties-for overhead associated with prepping and reading the detector example, the linear response, large dynamic range, and noise (the factorfin the efficiency relation becomes 1.0). (iv) Data attributes of CCDs result in improvements in data quality acquisition and analysis systems became capable of coping over that obtained photographically. with the large data rates. Table 2 shows the survey efficiencies of a range of optical In 1981 Maarten Schmidt (California Institute of Technol- instrumentation. The top line gives the parameters for the ogy), James Gunn (Princeton University), and I began tests venerable Palomar Optical Sky Survey. Although the col- to see ifCCD surveys could be effective in the search for very lecting area of the Palomar Schmidt is not particularly large high redshift quasars. At that time the highest known redshift (only about 6% of the 5-m Hale telescope, which was was 3.53, a discovery made in 1973. Despite extensive efforts completed at the same time and was situated only 200 m in the late 1970s, no larger redshift had
Recommended publications
  • Photometric Study of Two Near-Earth Asteroids in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Moving Objects Catalog
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2020 Photometric Study Of Two Near-Earth Asteroids In The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Moving Objects Catalog Christopher James Miko Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Miko, Christopher James, "Photometric Study Of Two Near-Earth Asteroids In The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Moving Objects Catalog" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 3287. https://commons.und.edu/theses/3287 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHOTOMETRIC STUDY OF TWO NEAR-EARTH ASTEROIDS IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY MOVING OBJECTS CATALOG by Christopher James Miko Bachelor of Science, Valparaiso University, 2013 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota August 2020 Copyright 2020 Christopher J. Miko ii Christopher J. Miko Name: Degree: Master of Science This document, submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree from the University of North Dakota, has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done and is hereby approved. ____________________________________ Dr. Ronald Fevig ____________________________________ Dr. Michael Gaffey ____________________________________ Dr. Wayne Barkhouse ____________________________________ Dr. Vishnu Reddy ____________________________________ ____________________________________ This document is being submitted by the appointed advisory committee as having met all the requirements of the School of Graduate Studies at the University of North Dakota and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    ASTROPHYSICAL RESEARCH CONSORTIUM Principles of Operation for SDSS-V VERSION: v1.1 Approved by the ARC Board of Governors 1 Introduction Over the past 15 years, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey has carried out some of the most influential surveys in the history of astronomy. Through four prior epochs, called SDSS-I, II, III, and IV, the SDSS has provided world-leading data sets for a vast range of astrophysical research, including the study of extragalactic astrophysics, cosmology, the Milky Way, the solar system, and stars. The current SDSS-IV project is funded to operate through June 30, 2020. At that time, the 2.5-m Sloan Foundation Telescope at Apache Point Observatory (APO) and its instruments will remain a world-leading facility for wide-field spectroscopy, ready to pursue further state-of-the-art investigations of the Universe. The APOGEE South spectrograph recently commissioned for use at the 2.5-m du Pont Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory (LCO) provides a matching state-of-the-art capability in the Southern hemisphere. SDSS-V as currently envisaged is a five-year program to use these facilities at APO and LCO to execute the first-ever all-sky, multi-epoch survey involving both near-infrared and optical spectroscopy, with rapid response target allocation enabled by new fiber-positioning robots. SDSS-V consists of three survey components. The Milky Way Mapper will conduct infrared and optical spectroscopy of millions of stars to chart and interpret our Galaxy’s history, and to understand the astrophysics of stars and their relation to planets. The Black Hole Mapper will monitor quasars and X-ray sources from next-generation X-ray satellites to investigate the physics and evolution of supermassive black holes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Remarkable Panoramic Space Telescope for the 2020'S
    A Remarkable Panoramic Space Telescope for the 2020s Dr. Marc Postman (SB ’81, MIT) Space Telescope Science Institute How are stars and galaxies formed? How does the universe work? Astronomers ask big questions. Are we alone? WFIRST: Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope Dark Energy, Dark Wide-Field Surveys of the Matter, and the Fate of the Universe Universe ? ? Technology Development for The full distribution of planets around stars Exploration of New Worlds National Academy of Sciences Astronomy & Astrophysics Decadal Survey (2010) DARK MATTER DARK ENERGY 26% 69% STARS, GAS, DUST, ALL WE CAN SEE 5% How do we know there is so much dark matter? And what could dark matter be? How do we know there is so much dark energy? And what is it? Do we need new physics? What new experiments do we need to run? What new observations do we need to make? Basic properties of dark matter… • Dark matter is likely a particle, the way protons and neutrons are particles. • These particles must be abundant. • Dark matter barely interacts, if at all, with other matter (except by gravity). • Dark matter does not emit light. • Dark matter is passing through each of us right now (about 3 x 10-7 micrograms every second)*. *Based on E. Siegel, Forbes We already know dark matter cannot be: • Black holes • Neutrinos • Dwarf planets • Cosmic dust • Squirrels https://xkcd.com/2186/ Cluster of galaxies We can measure the mass in a system by measuring orbital speeds and distances 60 50 Mercury 40 Venus 30 Earth Mars 20 Jupiter Orbital Velocity (km/s) Velocity Orbital 10
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Masses of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
    Measuring the Masses of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Rich Kron ARCS Institute, 14 June 2005, Yerkes Observatory images & spectra of NGC 2798/2799 physical size, orbital velocity, mass, and luminosity how to get data 2.5-meter telescope, Apache Point, New Mexico secondary mirror focal ratio = f/5 field-of-view = 3 degrees 2.5-m primary mirror camera or plate at focus five rows = five filters six columns = 6 scan lines plugging 640 optical fibers into a drilled aluminum plate telescope pointing sideways to left; spectrographs are the green boxes nighttime operations in observing room at Apache Point Observatory A: NGC 2798 B: NGC 2799 SDSS “field:” 2048 pixels wide = 13.6 arc minute 1489 pixels high = 9.8 arc minute 1 pixel = 0.4 arc second what can we learn about the galaxies? physical size R orbital velocity v mass M luminosity L index of dark matter M / L the first step is to determine the distance to the galaxies we need spectra for the galaxies, from which we derive redshifts spectrum ⇒ redshift ⇒ distance ⇒ physical size ⇒ etc. A SDSS spectrum (gif): area sampled is 3 arcsec diameter 4096 pixels wide: 3800 - 9200 Å y-axis is the flux per Ångstrom gif image is smoothed/compressed B The redshift z is an observed property of a galaxy (or quasar). It tells us the relative size of the Universe now with respect to the size of the Universe when light left the galaxy (or quasar). (1 + z) = (size now) / (size then) the redshift is measured from the observed positions of atomic lines in the spectra of galaxies and quasars for example, the
    [Show full text]
  • Mission & Instrument Overview
    Mission & Instrument Overview 1. ABSTRACT 2. Science OVERVIEW 3. MISSION 4. INSTRUMENT 4.1. Optical Design 4.2. Telescope 4.3. Window and Grism 4.4. Dichroic Beam Splitter 4.5. Filters 4.6. Detectors and Front-End Electronics 4.7. Instrument Ground Calibration and Performance 5. MISSION AND SCIENCE OPERATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS 6. REFERENCES Based upon Martin et al. 2003, “The Galaxy Evolution Explorer”, SPIE Conf. 4854, Future EUV-UV and Visible Space Astrophysics Missions and Instrumentation. 1.ABSTRACT The Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) is a NASA Small Explorer Mission launched April 28, 2003. GALEX is will performing the first Space Ultraviolet sky survey. Five imaging surveys in each of two bands (1350-1750Å and 1750-2800Å) range from an all- sky survey (limit mAB~20-21) to an ultra-deep survey of 4 square degrees (limit mAB~26). Three spectroscopic grism surveys (R=100-300) are underway with various depths (mAB~20-25) and sky coverage (100 to 2 square degrees) over the 1350-2800Å band. The instrument includes a 50 cm modified Ritchey-Chrétien telescope, a dichroic beam splitter and astigmatism corrector, two large sealed tube microchannel plate detectors to simultaneously cover the two bands and the 1.2 degree field of view. A rotating wheel provides either imaging or grism spectroscopy with transmitting optics. We will use the measured UV properties of local galaxies, along with corollary observations, to calibrate the UV-global star formation rate relationship in galaxies. We will apply this calibration to distant galaxies discovered in the deep imaging and spectroscopic surveys to map the history of star formation in the universe over the red shift range zero to two.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet Exploration Collaboration Initiative TP Exoplanets Final Report
    EXO Exoplanet Exploration Collaboration Initiative TP Exoplanets Final Report Ca Ca Ca H Ca Fe Fe Fe H Fe Mg Fe Na O2 H O2 The cover shows the transit of an Earth like planet passing in front of a Sun like star. When a planet transits its star in this way, it is possible to see through its thin layer of atmosphere and measure its spectrum. The lines at the bottom of the page show the absorption spectrum of the Earth in front of the Sun, the signature of life as we know it. Seeing our Earth as just one possibly habitable planet among many billions fundamentally changes the perception of our place among the stars. "The 2014 Space Studies Program of the International Space University was hosted by the École de technologie supérieure (ÉTS) and the École des Hautes études commerciales (HEC), Montréal, Québec, Canada." While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report, ISU does not take any responsibility for the accuracy of its content. Electronic copies of the Final Report and the Executive Summary can be downloaded from the ISU Library website at http://isulibrary.isunet.edu/ International Space University Strasbourg Central Campus Parc d’Innovation 1 rue Jean-Dominique Cassini 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden Tel +33 (0)3 88 65 54 30 Fax +33 (0)3 88 65 54 47 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.isunet.edu France Unless otherwise credited, figures and images were created by TP Exoplanets. Exoplanets Final Report Page i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The International Space University Summer Session Program 2014 and the work on the
    [Show full text]
  • Keith Horne: Refereed Publications Papers Submitted: 425. “A
    Keith Horne: Refereed Publications Papers Submitted: 427. “The Lick AGN Monitoring Project 2016: Velocity-Resolved Hβ Lags in Luminous Seyfert Galaxies.” V.U, A.J.Barth, H.A.Vogler, H.Guo, T.Treu, et al. (202?). ApJ, submitted (01 Oct 2021). 426. “Multi-wavelength Optical and NIR Variability Analysis of the Blazar PKS 0027-426.” E.Guise, S.F.H¨onig, T.Almeyda, K.Horne M.Kishimoto, et al. (202?). (arXiv:2108.13386) 425. “A second planet transiting LTT 1445A and a determination of the masses of both worlds.” J.G.Winters, et al. (202?) ApJ, submitted (30 Jul 2021). (arXiv:2107.14737) 424. “A Different-Twin Pair of Sub-Neptunes orbiting TOI-1064 Discovered by TESS, Characterised by CHEOPS and HARPS” T.G.Wilson et al. (202?). ApJ, submitted (12 Jul 2021). 423. “The LHS 1678 System: Two Earth-Sized Transiting Planets and an Astrometric Companion Orbiting an M Dwarf Near the Convective Boundary at 20 pc” M.L.Silverstein, et al. (202?). AJ, submitted (24 Jun 2021). 422. “A temperate Earth-sized planet with strongly tidally-heated interior transiting the M8 dwarf LP 791-18.” M.Peterson, B.Benneke, et al. (202?). submitted (09 May 2021). 421. “The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: UV-Optical Accretion Disk Measurements with Hubble Space Telescope.” Y.Homayouni, M.R.Sturm, J.R.Trump, K.Horne, C.J.Grier, Y.Shen, et al. (202?). ApJ submitted (06 May 2021). (arXiv:2105.02884) Papers in Press: 420. “Bayesian Analysis of Quasar Lightcurves with a Running Optimal Average: New Time Delay measurements of COSMOGRAIL Gravitationally Lensed Quasars.” F.R.Donnan, K.Horne, J.V.Hernandez Santisteban (202?) MNRAS, in press (28 Sep 2021).
    [Show full text]
  • FY13 High-Level Deliverables
    National Optical Astronomy Observatory Fiscal Year Annual Report for FY 2013 (1 October 2012 – 30 September 2013) Submitted to the National Science Foundation Pursuant to Cooperative Support Agreement No. AST-0950945 13 December 2013 Revised 18 September 2014 Contents NOAO MISSION PROFILE .................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 2 2 NOAO ACCOMPLISHMENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Achievements ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of Vision and Goals ................................................................................. 5 2.2.1 Status of FY13 High-Level Deliverables ............................................ 5 2.2.2 FY13 Planned vs. Actual Spending and Revenues .............................. 8 2.3 Challenges and Their Impacts ............................................................................ 9 3 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS .............................................................. 11 3.1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory ....................................................... 11 3.2 Kitt Peak National Observatory ....................................................................... 14 3.3 Gemini Observatory ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1, DES Collaboration
    DES-2017-0315 FERMILAB-PUB-17-603-AE-E DRAFT VERSION JANUARY 9, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61a THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY DATA RELEASE 1 T. M. C. ABBOTT,1 F. B. ABDALLA,2, 3 S. ALLAM,4 A. AMARA,5 J. ANNIS,4 J. ASOREY,6, 7, 8 S. AVILA,9, 10 O. BALLESTER,11 M. BANERJI,12, 13 W. BARKHOUSE,14 L. BARUAH,15 M. BAUMER,16, 17, 18 K. BECHTOL,19 M. R. BECKER,16, 17 A. BENOIT-LÉVY,20, 2, 21 G. M. BERNSTEIN,22 E. BERTIN,20, 21 J. BLAZEK,23, 24 S. BOCQUET,25 D. BROOKS,2 D. BROUT,22 E. BUCKLEY-GEER,4 D. L. BURKE,17, 18 V. BUSTI,26, 27 R. CAMPISANO,26 L. CARDIEL-SAS,11 A. CARNERO ROSELL,28, 26 M. CARRASCO KIND,29, 30 J. CARRETERO,11 F. J. CASTANDER,31, 32 R. CAWTHON,33 C. CHANG,33 C. CONSELICE,34 G. COSTA,26 M. CROCCE,31, 32 C. E. CUNHA,17 C. B. D’ANDREA,22 L. N. DA COSTA,26, 28 R. DAS,35 G. DAUES,29 T. M. DAVIS,7, 8 C. DAVIS,17 J. DE VICENTE,36 D. L. DEPOY,37 J. DEROSE,17, 16 S. DESAI,38 H. T. DIEHL,4 J. P. DIETRICH,39, 40 S. DODELSON,41 P. DOEL,2 A. DRLICA-WAGNER,4 T. F. EIFLER,42, 43 A. E. ELLIOTT,44 A. E. EVRARD,35, 45 A. FARAHI,35 A. FAUSTI NETO,26 E. FERNANDEZ,11 D. A. FINLEY,4 B. FLAUGHER,4 R. J. FOLEY,46 P.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensemble Properties of Comets in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey ⇑ Michael Solontoi A, ,Zˇeljko Ivezic´ B, Mario Juric´ C, Andrew C
    Icarus 218 (2012) 571–584 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Ensemble properties of comets in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey ⇑ Michael Solontoi a, ,Zˇeljko Ivezic´ b, Mario Juric´ c, Andrew C. Becker b, Lynne Jones b, Andrew A. West e, Steve Kent f, Robert H. Lupton d, Mark Claire b, Gillian R. Knapp d, Tom Quinn b, James E. Gunn d, Donald P. Schneider g a Adler Planetarium, 1300 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA b University of Washington, Dept. of Astronomy, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA c Harvard College Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA d Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA e Department of Astronomy, Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215, USA f Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510, USA g Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA article info abstract Article history: We present the ensemble properties of 31 comets (27 resolved and 4 unresolved) observed by the Sloan Received 17 May 2011 Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). This sample of comets represents about 1 comet per 10 million SDSS photo- Revised 25 September 2011 metric objects. Five-band (u,g,r,i,z) photometry is used to determine the comets’ colors, sizes, surface Accepted 17 October 2011 brightness profiles, and rates of dust production in terms of the Afq formalism. We find that the cumu- Available online 9 December 2011 lative luminosity function for the Jupiter Family Comets in our sample is well fit by a power law of the form N(<H) / 10(0.49±0.05)H for H < 18, with evidence of a much shallower fit N(<H) / 10(0.19±0.03)H for Keywords: the faint (14.5 < H < 18) comets.
    [Show full text]
  • Events in Science, Mathematics, and Technology | Version 3.0
    EVENTS IN SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND TECHNOLOGY | VERSION 3.0 William Nielsen Brandt | [email protected] Classical Mechanics -260 Archimedes mathematically works out the principle of the lever and discovers the principle of buoyancy 60 Hero of Alexandria writes Metrica, Mechanics, and Pneumatics 1490 Leonardo da Vinci describ es capillary action 1581 Galileo Galilei notices the timekeeping prop erty of the p endulum 1589 Galileo Galilei uses balls rolling on inclined planes to show that di erentweights fall with the same acceleration 1638 Galileo Galilei publishes Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences 1658 Christian Huygens exp erimentally discovers that balls placed anywhere inside an inverted cycloid reach the lowest p oint of the cycloid in the same time and thereby exp erimentally shows that the cycloid is the iso chrone 1668 John Wallis suggests the law of conservation of momentum 1687 Isaac Newton publishes his Principia Mathematica 1690 James Bernoulli shows that the cycloid is the solution to the iso chrone problem 1691 Johann Bernoulli shows that a chain freely susp ended from two p oints will form a catenary 1691 James Bernoulli shows that the catenary curve has the lowest center of gravity that anychain hung from two xed p oints can have 1696 Johann Bernoulli shows that the cycloid is the solution to the brachisto chrone problem 1714 Bro ok Taylor derives the fundamental frequency of a stretched vibrating string in terms of its tension and mass p er unit length by solving an ordinary di erential equation 1733 Daniel Bernoulli
    [Show full text]
  • Craf Pub Eng050126.Indd
    I NFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC The Crafoord Prize 2005 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Crafoord Prize in Astronomy 2005 to James Gunn, Princeton University, USA, James Peebles, Princeton University, USA, and Martin Rees, University of Cambridge, UK, “for contributions towards understanding the large-scale structure of the Universe”. How was the Universe formed? One of the most obvious facts about the Universe is that it shows a wealth of struc- ture on all scales from planets, stars and galaxies up to clusters of galaxies and super-clusters extending over several hundred million light years. Astronomi- cal observations have shown that the galaxies are not evenly distributed, but are mainly found in clusters and enormous filaments (Fig. 1). Often this is referred to as the ’cosmic web’. The origin and history of this structure has long been one of the most important problems for astronomy and cosmology. The recipients of this year’s Crafoord Prize have all made fundamental contributions to the dramatic increase in our understanding of how this large-scale structure was formed. The first traces of structure in the Universe can be seen in the fluctuations of the cosmic microwave background radiation about 380,000 years after Big Bang (Fig. 2). The origin of the fluctuations can, however, be traced back to epochs much earlier in the history of the Universe when small quantum fluctuations gave rise Fig. 1. Two dimensional distribution of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The plot corresponds to a thin slice in the ’vertical’ direction, but covering most of the sky in the other direction.
    [Show full text]