Congo's Victims of Corruption

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congo's Victims of Corruption DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO CONGO’S VICTIMS OF CORRUPTION There is nothing here. There is only suffering. A victim of corruption in Congo ABOUT RAID is a UK based non-governmental organization which exposes corporate wrongdoing, environmental damage and human rights abuses, partnering with those harmed to hold companies to account. Through rigorous investigation, advocacy and the law, RAID seeks to strengthen regulation of business and achieve justice. African Resources Watch (AFREWATCH), is a Congolese non-go- vernmental organization based in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo, advocating for fair and equitable exploitation of natural resources, holding States and companies responsible. CONTENTS Executive Summary .....................................................................................................I Recommendations .................................................................................................... XIV Methodology ............................................................................................................ XVIII Map ............................................................................................................................... XIX Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 Context: The “DRC Corruption Scheme” .................................................................2 A. The US Department of Justice Case .........................................................................................................................................2 B. Dan Gertler’s Acquisition of the KMT Mine and Onward Sale ..........................................................................................3 C. ENRC and the UK Serious Fraud Office ....................................................................................................................................4 The KMT Mine and its Promise for Development.................................................7 1. International Finance Corporation Investment ...................................................................................... 7 A. Environmental and Social Commitments ............................................................................................................................. 8 B. Oversight and Safeguards ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 The Congolese Victims of Corruption ....................................................................11 1. Direct Harm to Communities................................................................................................................................. 12 A. An Unhealthy and Polluted Environment ..............................................................................................................................16 B. Abrupt End of Community Development Projects .............................................................................................................21 C. Unfinished Resettlement ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 2. Direct Harm to Workers and Their Families ...............................................................................................30 A. Loss of Employment ................................................................................................................................................................... 32 B. Legal Efforts in DRC ....................................................................................................................................................................38 How Congolese Victims were identified ..............................................................39 A. The Document Trail .....................................................................................................................................................................39 B. Near completion of the KMT construction phase ............................................................................................................39 C. Causal links ...................................................................................................................................................................................40 Broadening the View of Victims of Corruption ...................................................43 A. Risk of Designating the State as the Victim .....................................................................................................................44 B. Existing Legal Tools Can Help .................................................................................................................................................. 45 C. Linking Corruption and Human Rights Violations ............................................................................................................46 ERG’s New Programmes at the KMT Mine (renamed Metalkol RTR) ............49 Conclusion.................................................................................................................... 52 Annex ............................................................................................................................. 53 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On 16 September 2009, the Kingam- Their voices, like so many other yambo Musonoi Tailings (KMT) mine victims of corruption, are largely in Kolwezi in Democratic Republic of ignored.1 Congo suddenly closed, against the company’s will. A company offi- This report aims to demonstrate the cial told the confused workers the reasons why Jean, and others in the Congolese government had unlawfully affected communities, should be stripped First Quantum Minerals, a considered overseas victims of corrup- Canadian company which owned the tion. As a step towards this, the focus copper and cobalt mine, of its mining of this report is on the identification licence. The 700 Congolese workers and recognition of such victims and « THE VOICES no longer had jobs. the harm caused to them. Any legal proceedings against entities OF CONGOLESE One of the workers, Jean returned or persons involved in corruption VICTIMS, LIKE home, uncertain about his future. A should recognise victims, like Jean, few days later, his 14-year-old son, and include then in any compensation SO MANY OTHER Benoit*, fell ill. Jean took his son to that might arise. the health clinic that treated KMT VICTIMS OF workers and their families, a benefit For victims of overseas corruption to CORRUPTION, ARE he received from his employment at be recognised and compensated, the the mine. But because the mine had view that “corruption is a victimless LARGELY IGNORED. » closed, the doctor refused to treat crime” needs to be set aside. This Benoit unless his father could pay the has begun to happen, not least in medical fees upfront. Not having re- the UK which positioned itself at the ceived his last paycheque, and with no vanguard of fighting corruption when severance pay, Jean lacked the funds. it hosted an international Anti-Cor- He had no option but to leave ruption Summit attended by world carrying his sick son. On their way leaders in May 2016. home, Benoit died. The UK pledged not only to expose, Action against the corruption that led pursue and punish those involved in to the mining licence being stripped corruption, but also to compensate and the mine’s closure has been taken the overseas victims of corruption and in the United States; however, to date, return stolen assets. the detrimental impact on Congolese- victims of the corruption, like Jean and his family, have not been considered in any investigation or legal action. * Pseudonyms are used throughout the report to maintain confidentiality and privacy. 1 RAID and AFREWATCH recognise that, if and when such legal proceedings arise, additional Congo’s Victims of Corruption i research may be required to further set out causality and to quantify the harm caused. Following the summit, the UK go- The Serious Fraud Office (SFO), the vernment adopted, in June 2018, the preeminent UK agency charged with General Principles to compensate tackling overseas corruption, should overseas victims (including affected actively work to implement the Com- States) in bribery, corruption and pensation Principles. Specifically, this economic crime cases (the «Com- report contends that one of the SFO’s pensation Principles»). The principles longest-running corruption investiga- were progressive in establishing that tions, that of the Kazakh multinational « PROSECUTING UK law enforcement agencies shall mining company, Eurasian Natural identify overseas victims in all relevant Resources Corporation (ENRC Ltd AUTHORITIES cases and consider compensating previously ENRC Plc), a UK-registered SHOULD ENSURE ALL them by using whatever legal mecha- company listed on the London Stock nisms available. At the time of this Exchange until 2013, provides an VOICES ARE HEARD report’s publication, the Compensa- important opportunity to apply the tion Principles had been in place for Compensation Principles and ensure WHEN IT COMES just over a year, although government that potential Congolese victims are TO PRESENTING officials involved in fighting corruption identified as part of the investigation. have said their agencies have been In the event any party is convicted at THE HARM CAUSED applying similar
Recommended publications
  • The Economics of Name of Report
    THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAINS OF CRITICAL MATERIALS: BEHAVIOURS AND OUTCOMES IN THE COBALT SECTOR J. C. M BEDDER St Catherine’s College University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2020 The reconfiguration of the global supply chains of critical materials: behaviours and outcomes in the cobalt sector Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. This dissertation is submitted according to the requirements of the Degree Committee of Land Economy. It does not exceed the regulation length including footnotes, references and appendices. Jonathan Charles Michael Bedder 10th March 2020 Words: 79,997 (without tables) 1 The reconfiguration of the global supply chains of critical materials: behaviours and outcomes in the cobalt sector Abstract Why are contemporary raw material supply chains structured as they are? This dissertation explores what shapes the supply chains of ‘critical materials’, metals and minerals which are of high economic importance and are at risk of supply shortage.
    [Show full text]
  • GLENCORE: a Guide to the 'Biggest Company You've Never Heard
    GLENCORE: a guide to the ‘biggest company you’ve never heard of’ WHO IS GLENCORE? Glencore is the world’s biggest commodities trading company and 16th largest company in the world according to Fortune 500. When it went public, it controlled 60% of the zinc market, 50% of the trade in copper, 45% of lead and a third of traded aluminium and thermal coal. On top of that, Glencore also trades oil, gas and basic foodstuffs like grain, rice and sugar. Sometimes refered to as ‘the biggest company you’ve never heard of’, Glencore’s reach is so vast that almost every person on the planet will come into contact with products traded by Glencore, via the minerals in cell phones, computers, cars, trains, planes and even the grains in meals or the sugar in drinks. It’s not just a trader: Glencore also produces and extracts these commodities. It owns significant mining interests, and in Democratic Republic of Congo it has two of the country’s biggest copper and cobalt operations, called KCC and MUMI. Glencore listed on the London Stock Exchange in 2011 in what is still the biggest ever Initial Public Offering (IPO) in the stock exchange’s history, with a valuation of £36bn. Glencore started life as Marc Rich & Co AG, set up by the eponymous and notorious commodities trader in 1974. In 1983 Rich was charged in the US with massive tax evasion and trading with Iran. He fled to Switzerland and lived in exile while on the FBI's most-wanted list for nearly two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Kumba Annual Report 2005 Kumba’ S Geographical Locations
    ANNUALREPORT2005 ANNUAL REPORT 2005 contents Foldout: Group review at a glance Summary of business operations Kumba’s geographical locations Group operational structure 1 Group profile 2 Our values 4 Approach to sustainable development 5 Business objectives 8 Chairman’s statement 9 Chief executive’s review 12 Empowerment transaction 16 Macro-economic review 20 Commodity review 21 Financial review 23 Business operations review 32 Growth 44 Review of mineral resources and reserves 47 Legislative compliance 53 Executive committee 56 Directorate 58 Corporate governance 60 Risk management 66 Shareholders’ information 69 Shareholders’ analysis 70 Sustainable development summary 72 Economic summary 73 Safety, health and environment management summary 74 Social summary 80 Assurance report 104 Index to Global Reporting Initiative indicators 107 Group cash valued added statement 115 Supplementary financial information 116 Selected group financial data translated into US dollars 118 Definitions 119 Annual financial statements 120 Notice of annual general meeting 192 Biographies of directors seeking re-election 196 Form of proxy 197 Administration and shareholders’ diary IBC GROUP REVIEW AT A GLANCE 12-months 12-months ended ended Years ended 30 June 31 December 31 December Compound 2005 20041 2003 2002 annual Audited Unaudited Audited growth rate5 Restated2 Restated2 Abridged financial statements % Rm Rm Rm Rm INCOME STATEMENTS Revenue 19,3 11 962 8 709 7 469 7 182 Net operating profit (including impairment charges and goodwill amortisation) 48,3
    [Show full text]
  • Comment Letter on Disclosure of Payments by Resource
    THE CARTER CENTER flt * March 16, 2020 The Honorable Jay Clayton Chair, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street N.E. Washington, DC 20459-1090 Dear Chair Clayton, I am writing to urge the SEC to improve the proposed reporting rule for Section 1504 of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Release No. 34-87783; File No. S7-24-19). The current rule as drafted does not meet global transparency standards for the disclosure of payments by extractive sector companies to governments, instead allowing for the aggregation of payments across projects and establishing exemptions that will result in many important revenue flows going unreported. Tracking these payments is an important element in the fight against corruption, and the proposed rule fails to require the level of disclosure that is needed to enable civil society to hold their governments accountable. This work is critical in countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where The Carter Center supports civil society to use extractive sector information to advance reforms. The DRC is among the poorest nations in the world despite vast natural resource wealth. If properly managed, extractive industry revenues could help alleviate poverty and generate economic growth. Yet in the DRC and other resource-rich countries, these hopes are often dashed. Opacity facilitates corruption and a lack of accountability, while citizens and communities suffer. While the DRC has made some progress in improving transparency as a result of its participation in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and recent legal reforms, the complex revenue streams remain difficult to track.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:19-Cv-03737 Document 1 Filed 12/15/19 Page 1 of 79
    Case 1:19-cv-03737 Document 1 Filed 12/15/19 Page 1 of 79 TERRENCE COLLINGSWORTH (DC Bar # 471830) International Rights Advocates 621 Maryland Ave NE Washington, D.C. 20002 Tel: 202-543-5811 E-mail: [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ________________ JANE DOE 1, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JOHN DOE 1, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JOHN DOE 2, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JENNA ROE 3, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JAMES DOE 4, Individually and on Case No. CV: behalf of Proposed Class Members; JOHN DOE 5, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JENNA DOE 6, Individually and on CLASS COMPLAINT FOR behalf of Proposed Class Members; INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND JANE DOE 2, Individually and on DAMAGES behalf of Proposed Class Members; JENNA DOE 7, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JENNA DOE 8, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JOHN DOE 9, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JENNA DOE 10, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JENNA DOE 11, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JANE DOE 3, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; JOHN DOE 12, Individually and on 1 Case 1:19-cv-03737 Document 1 Filed 12/15/19 Page 2 of 79 behalf of Proposed Class Members; and JOHN DOE 13, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members; all Plaintiffs C/O 621 Maryland Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Carter Center Metalkol-Asset-Sale Press
    EMBARGOED UNTIL 3 A.M. GMT, OCTOBER 26 Oct. 26, 2016 In Atlanta: Soyia Ellison, [email protected] In DRC: Daniel Mulé, [email protected] Carter Center Urges DRC to Disclose Sale Contract for State-owned Mining Company’s Metalkol Share The Carter Center urges the government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to release the contract under which state-owned mining company Gécamines sold its interests in the Kolwezi Tailings project. The sale apparently took place in April 2016, but that fact became known only yesterday when Bloomberg News reported that Gécamines and its subsidiary, Société Immobilière du Congo (SIMCO), sold their collective 25 percent stake in Metalkol, the joint venture with Eurasian Resources Group, which owns the Kolwezi Tailings permit. In order to allow for transparent review, the public release of the contract should indicate the sale price and the destination and proposed use of the proceeds. The government has repeatedly expressed its strong commitment to contract transparency and adherence to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative Standard, which requires that all state entities, including state-owned companies, disclose their revenues. Publishing such information allows the Congolese public to review whether transactions are fair and could potentially contribute to sustainable development. “The Metalkol asset sale is the latest in a growing list of undisclosed Gécamines transactions,” said Daniel Mulé, the Carter Center’s extractive industries governance program manager. “It is essential that the government immediately release the contracts for the sale of the Metalkol stakes and other undisclosed transactions for which the government—mandated 60-day publication deadline has long past.” The Kolwezi Tailings' peculiar history warrants scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS RISKS and the DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of the CONGO What Happens When Kabila Steps Down?
    BUSINESS RISKS AND THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO What happens when Kabila steps down? Business risks and the DRC: what happens when Kabila steps down? Introduction Long-sitting autocrats are due to step down across Africa over the next few years. The first in line is Joseph Kabila, the president of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). While political transitions always carry risk of uncertainty, the 23 December presidential election will be a litmus test for the country. As in most post-authoritarian political contexts, the stability of the country will depend on the legacy of the leader. Nowhere in the world is this more evident than in the African context, and in the DRC in particular where the legacy is far from ideal, and the risks to stability remain high. While the DRC’s political and security problems are well-known, few are privy to the stranglehold Kabila and his immediate family and friends have over the economy and business environment since taking power in 2006. Kabila’s growing business interests and wealth over the past 12 years, along with the promotion of a staunch Kabilist as his successor, could indicate that Kabila is intent on remaining untouchable even after 23 December. This, in addition to Kabila’s influence of the Congolese economy indicates that multinational companies looking to conduct operations in the DRC and the surrounding region could continue to face very similar political and security risks, as well as problems relating to corruption and money- laundering, in the medium- to long terms. A family affair Since 2006, President Joseph Kabila and his immediate family have allegedly amassed huge wealth since he came to power in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Glencore: Notorious Crimes and Failures
    Glencore: Notorious crimes and failures Mining giant Glencore has made aggressive use Presence: 50+ countries of complex corporate structure and tax havens Number of employees: 155.000 (2016)5 to deprive developing nations of tax revenues, while frequently being accused of human and Company activity environmental rights violations in the course of Main activities: production, sourcing, processing, refining, its business. transporting, storage, financing and supply of metals and minerals, energy products and agricultural products. Problem Analysis Country and location in which Swiss mining giant Glencore has made extensive efforts to exploit corporate power for its own advantage, often the violation occurred at the expense of human and environmental rights. It has As Glencore owns over 150 mining & metallurgical, oil made use of Investor–State dispute mechanisms when production and agricultural assets around the world, there governments have restricted its activity. It has adopted are many different countries involved and affected. a complex international structure to minimise its tax Ghana, Chad, Zambia, Bolivia, Colombia, Philippines, exposure and so deprived a number of developing nations Argentina etc.7 of tax revenues, including Zambia and Burkina Faso. It has been accused of causing human rights violations and Summary of the case environmental damage at mining operations as far afield as Response of Glencore to several of these issues http:// Peru and Australia. www.glencore.com/assets/public-positions/doc/ Company Glencores-response-to-the-2015-Public-Eye-Nomination. pdf & http://www.glencore.com/public-positions Main Company: Glencore plc. 1. ISDS cases Head office: Baar, Switzerland In 2016, Glencore initiated two ISDS (Investor State Registered office: Saint Helier, Jersey Dispute Settlement) cases.
    [Show full text]
  • The State Vs. the People
    The State vs. the people Governance, mining and the transitional regime in the Democratic Republic of Congo The State vs. the people Governance, mining and the transitional regime in the Democratic Republic of Congo NiZA Netherlands institute for Southern Africa PO Box 10707 1001 ES Amsterdam The Netherlands T: +31 (0)20 520 62 10 F: +31 (0)20 520 62 49 E: [email protected] I: www.niza.nl Copyright © Netherlands institute for Southern Africa 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Colophon: Pubished by : Netherlands institute for Southern Africa and International Peace Information Service picture: Jean Pierre Muteba Layout: Annemiek Mion (NiZA) Printed by: Felix Offset Amsterdam ISBN: ISBN-10: 90-78028-04-1 ISBN-13: 978-90-78028-04-8 Prins Hendrikkade 33 PO Box 10707 1001 ES Amsterdam The Netherlands T: +31 (0) 20 520 62 10 F: +31 (0) 20 520 62 49 IPIS, vzw E: [email protected] Italiëlei 98a I: www.niza.nl 2000 Payments: 600 657 Antwerpen Table of Contents Map of the Democratic Republic of Congo...................................................................... 1 Map of mine sites in the DRC .......................................................................................... 2 i. Recommendations .................................................................................................... 3 ii. Abbreviations.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Minerals and Prevention Policies
    Conflict Minerals and Prevention Policies The case of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Jakob Johann Stakowski Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Iceland 2011 Conflict Minerals and Prevention Policies The case of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Jakob Johann Stakowski 10 credit thesis part of the Baccalaureus Scientiarum degree in Human Geography Supervisor Magnfríður Júlíusdóttir Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavík, 13 May 2011 ii Conflict Minerals and Prevention Policies – The case of the Democratic Republic of the Congo 10 credit thesis part of the Baccalaureus Scientiarum degree in Human Geography Copyrights © 2011 Jakob Johann Stakowski All rights reserved Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Askja, Sturlugata 7 107 Reykjavík Phone: 525 4000 Reference information: Stakowski, J. J. (2011). Conflict minerals and prevention policies – The case of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, 37 pages. Print: Háskólafjölritun Reykjavík, May 2011 iii Statement of the author I hereby state that this thesis has been written by me and. the content, partly or in total, has never been published before. _____________________ Jakob Johann Stakowski iv Abstract This thesis explores the conflict in the Eastern provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in relation to international development policy in the new millennium and demand for minerals from the conflict zone by western corporations. I use a critical theoretical approach on development aid and initiatives to prevent trade with minerals from conflict areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter.P65
    Confidential U.S. State Department Central Files CONGO 1960–January 1963 INTERNAL AFFAIRS Decimal Numbers 755A, 770G, 855A, 870G, 955A, and 970G and FOREIGN AFFAIRS Decimal Numbers 655A, 670G, 611.55A, and 611.70G Project Coordinator Robert E. Lester Guide Compiled by Martin Schipper A UPA Collection from 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Confidential U.S. State Department central files. Congo, 1960–January 1963 [microform] : internal affairs and foreign affairs / [project coordinator, Robert E. Lester]. microfilm reels ; 35 mm. Accompanied by a printed guide, compiled by Martin Schipper, entitled: A guide to the microfilm edition of Confidential U.S. State Department central files. Congo, 1960–January 1963. “The documents reproduced in this publication are among the records of the U.S. Department of State in the custody of the National Archives of the United States.” ISBN 1-55655-809-0 1. Congo (Democratic Republic)—History—Civil War, 1960–1965—Sources. 2. Congo (Democratic Republic)—Politics and government—1960–1997—Sources. 3. Congo (Democratic Republic)—Foreign relations—1960–1997—Sources. 4. United States. Dept. of State—Archives. I. Title: Confidential US State Department central files. Congo, 1960–January 1963. II. Lester, Robert. III. Schipper, Martin Paul. IV. United States. Dept. of State. V. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. VI. University Publications of America (Firm) VII. Title: Guide to the microfilm edition of Confidential U.S. State Department central files. Congo, 1960–January 1963. DT658.22 967.5103’1—dc21 2001045336 CIP The documents reproduced in this publication are among the records of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • First Quantum Minerals Ltd
    OFFERING CIRCULAR DATED 15 JUNE 2009 First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (continued into the province of British Columbia, Canada under the Business Corporation Act (British Columbia) with incorporation no: C0726351) U.S.$500,000,000 6.0 per cent. Convertible Bonds due 2014 convertible into Common Shares of First Quantum Minerals Ltd. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Issue Price 100 per cent. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Global Coordinator NOMURA INTERNATIONAL Joint Bookrunners and Joint Lead Managers NOMURA INTERNATIONAL MORGAN STANLEY Co-Manager RBC CAPITAL MARKETS 1 This Offering Circular (the "Offering Circular") comprises listing particulars given in compliance with the listing rules made under Section 73A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the "FSMA") by the UK Listing Authority (the "UKLA") for the purpose of giving information with regard to First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (the "Issuer" or the "Company"), and the Issuer and its subsidiaries taken as a whole (the "Group") and the U.S.$500,000,000 6.0 per cent. convertible bonds due 2014 (the "Bonds"). Applications have been made for the Bonds to be admitted to the Official List of the UKLA and to be admitted to trading on the Professional Securities Market of the London Stock Exchange plc (the "LSE"). References in this Offering Circular to the Bonds being "listed" (and all related references) shall mean that the Bonds have been admitted to the Official List and have been admitted to trading on the Professional Securities Market. The Professional Securities Market is an unregulated market for the purposes of Directive 2004/39/EC (the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive). This Offering Circular is to be read in conjunction with all the documents which are incorporated by reference herein (see "Documents Incorporated by Reference").
    [Show full text]