Planning and Development Committee Meeting Agenda Tuesday March 6, 2018 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, Town Hall

CALL TO ORDER

DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST

CONSENT AGENDA

PUBLIC MEETING

1. Application for Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment, 21T- 17007 & RZ 17-11 12290 Hutchinson Farm Lane Par of Lot 19, Concession 1 W.H.S. (Chinguacousy).

Presentation by Jason Afonso, Associate, Glen Schnarr and Associates.

a) Notice b) Public Meeting Report c) Presentation

DELEGATIONS

STAFF REPORTS

Staff Report 2018-23 Proposed Bell Mobility Telecommunications Tower, 2 Snelcrest Drive (Valleywood Fire Station), Ward 2, File No.: SPA 16 - 61T

Staff Report 2018-21 Proposed Signum Wireless Telecommunications Tower, 12942 Road ( Fairgrounds), Ward 2, File No.: SPA 16-61T

RECOMMENDATIONS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES

1. Heritage Caledon Report dated February 12, 2018.

Planning and Development Committee has been requested to consider the following recommendations from Heritage Caledon:

REQUEST TO REMOVE STRUCTURE ON LISTED PROPERTY AT 16955 MOUNT PLEASANT ROAD

That the owner’s request to remove the two log structures from the property at 16955 Mount Pleasant Road for re-use elsewhere be supported; and

That the property at 16955 Mount Pleasant Road be removed from the Heritage Register following completion of the removal of the log cabins

Committee of the Whole – Planning and Development March 6, 2018 Page 2 of 2

CORRESPONDENCE

1. Memorandum to Council from Margherita Bialy, Community Planner, Community Services, dated March 6, 2018 re: Palgrave Estate Residential Community Policy Review – Project Status and Release of Discussion Paper

CONFIDENTIAL SESSION

Confidential Staff Report 2018-7 re: A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or board - Proposed Bell Mobility telecommunications tower, 2 Snelcrest Drive (Valleywood Fire Station), Ward 2

ADJOURNMENT

Accessibility Accommodations

Assistive listening devices for use in the Council Chamber are available upon request from the Staff in the Town’s Legislative Services Section. American Sign Language (ASL) Interpreters are also available upon request.

Please provide advance notice if you require an accessibility accommodation to attend or participate in Council Meetings or to access information in an alternate format please contact Legislative Services by phone at 905-584-2272 x. 2366 or via email to [email protected].

Notice of Public Meeting Proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision & Zoning By-law Amendment

FILE NUMBER(S): 21T-17007 & RZ 17-11 When and Where: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Community Involvement: A Public Meeting will be held to consider a proposed Draft Plan of Info Session: 6:00p.m. Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment. This is your way to Public Meeting: 7:00p.m. offer input and get involved. Council Chambers, Town Hall, 6311 Old Church Road, Applicant and Location: Caledon East, ON Applicant: Glen Schnarr & Associates Inc. on behalf of L7C 1J6 Caledon 410 Developments Ltd. Location: 12290 Hutchinson Farm Lane Part of Lot 19, Concession 1 W.H.S. (Chinguacousy) West side of Hutchinson Farm Lane, North of Additional Information: Robertson Davies Drive and Virginia Drive Contact: Brandon Ward, Ward 2 Senior Development Planner Area: 38.14ha (94.25ac) 905.584.2272 x.4283 or [email protected] What are the Proposed Changes? The Plan of Subdivision proposal is for 509 residential dwelling units comprised of 197 single- detached dwellings, 39 on-street townhouse dwellings, 255 rear-laneway townhouse dwellings and 18 back-to-back townhouse dwellings. In addition, the Plan of Subdivision proposes to create a 6.39 hectare (15.79 acre) commercial block, a 0.60 hectare (1.48 acre) transit hub block, a 1.22 hectare (3.01 acre) Institutional block, a 1.84 hectare (4.55 acre) stormwater management facility block, as well as various blocks for environmental protection (Woodlot, Wetlands and Buffer areas) and open space (park and greenland corridor) purposes. The Zoning By-law amendment proposes to rezone the subject lands from Agricultural (A1) to Mixed Density Residential with Exceptions (RMD-X), General Commercial with Exceptions (C-X), Institutional (I), Open Space (OS) and Environmental Policy Area 1 (EPA1) zones to permit the proposed development.

Additional Information A copy of the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment and additional information and material about the proposed applications will be available to the public prior to the meeting at the Community Services, Planning and Development Department counter at Town Hall. Office hours are Monday to Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Please visit the Town’s website at www.caledon.ca/development or contact the Development Planner to obtain a copy of the location map.

Appeal Procedure: If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to The Corporation of the Town of Caledon before the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision is approved or refused and/or the Zoning By-law Amendment is adopted, the person or public body is not entitled to appeal the decision of The Corporation of the Town of Caledon to the Municipal Board. If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting, or make written submissions to The Corporation of the Town of Caledon before the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision is approved or refused and/or the Zoning By-law Amendment is adopted, the person or public body may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Municipal Board unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so.

How to Stay Informed: If you wish to stay informed of the project described above, you must make a written request to the Clerk of the Town of Caledon, 6311 Old Church Road, Caledon, Ontario, L7C 1J6. Accessibility If you require an accessibility accommodation to attend or participate in this Public Meeting, or to access any materials related to this item in an alternate format please contact Legislative Services by phone at 905-584-2272 x.2366 or via email at [email protected]. Requests should be submitted at least 10 days before the Public Meeting.

Notice Date: February 8, 2018

OLD SCHOOL RD

ARCADIA RD

JUDGE ST

HURONTARIOST

TUNDRA RD

LANE B

Subject Lands # OLDKENNEDY RD

HIGHWAY HIGHWAY 410 S MCLAUGHLIN RD

RAIL LINE RR

VALLEYWOOD BLVD

HIGHWAY 410 N

LIGHTHEART DR KENNEDY RD KENNEDY

HURONTARIOST

MAYFIELD RD

¯ 1:20,000

Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft LOCATION MAP Plan of Subdivision Applications RZ 17-11 & 21T-17007C Caledon 410 Developments Limited Date: December 18, 2017

12290 Hutchison Farm Lane File No.: RZ 17-11 21T-17007C Part Lot 19, Concession 1 WHS (CHING) Public Meeting Information Report Community Services Department – Planning and Development Public Meeting: Tuesday March 6, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, Town Hall

Applicant: Glen Schnarr & Associates Inc. on behalf of Caledon 410 Developments Ltd. File No’s.: 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11

The Purpose of a Public Meeting:

In accordance with the Planning Act, a Public Meeting is held for applicants to present their applications to the public and Council, to receive comments and answer questions that the public and members of Council may have.

Staff and Council will not make a recommendation or decision on the applications at a Public Meeting. A Planning Report will be brought forward by staff and considered by Council at a later date.

As a member of the public, you are welcome to request to be notified of any future Public or Council Meetings. Please provide your contact information on the ‘Sign-In’ sheet provided in the lobby. Please be advised that the sign-in information will form part of the public record for these applications.

Property Information:

The subject land is located on the west side of Hurontario Street/Hutchinson Farm Lane and north of Collingwood Avenue (City of Brampton), within the Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan Area. The subject lands are approximately 38.14 hectares (94.25 acres) in area and contain an agricultural field with wooded areas within the northwest and southwest portions of the site. Existing uses surrounding the subject lands consist of farmland to the west and north; the Hurontario Street/Highway 410 Interchange to the east and low-density residential dwellings in the City of Brampton to the south. Please see Schedule “A” – Location Map with Aerial Photograph, attached.

The subject property is located within the Mayfield West Phase 2 (“MW2”) Secondary Plan area. The Region of Peel Official Plan designates the lands as within the Mayfield West Phase 2 Rural Service Centre on Schedule “D”- Regional Structure. The Town of Caledon Official Plan designates the lands within the Mayfield West Phase 2 Settlement Area on Schedule ‘A’ (Town of Caledon Land Use Plan). The Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan designates the subject lands as Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, General Commercial, Institutional, Transit Hub, Open Space Policy Area, Environmental Policy Area and Stormwater Pond Facility on Schedule “B-2” (Mayfield West Phase 2 Land Use Plan). The property is zoned Agricultural (A1) in Zoning By-law 2006-50, as amended.

Proposal Information:

On December 1st and December 12th, 2017, the Town of Caledon received Draft Plan of Subdivision (21T-17001C) and Zoning By-law Amendment (RZ 17-04) application submissions from Glen Schnarr & Associates Inc. on behalf of Caledon 410 Developments Ltd. for the subject lands. The applications were deemed complete on December 14th, 2017.

The Draft Plan of Subdivision application (21T-17007C) is proposing to create 509 residential dwelling units comprised of 197 single-detached dwellings, 39 on-street townhouse dwellings, 255 rear-laneway townhouse dwellings and 18 back-to-back townhouse dwellings. In addition, the draft plan proposes to create various blocks for the following land uses: • Commercial (6.39 hectares / 15.79 acres)

Page | 1 of 7 Public Meeting Information Report Community Services Department – Planning and Development • Transit Hub (0.60 hectares / 1.48 acres) • Institutional (1.22 hectares / 3.01 acres) • Environmental Policy Area – Woodlot, Wetlands and Buffer Areas (6.92 hectares / 17.1 acres) • Open Space Policy Area (0.30 hectares / 0.74 acres) • Community Park (0.25 hectares / 0.62 acres) • Greenway Corridor (0.17 hectares / 0.42 acres) • Stormwater Management Facility (1.84 hectares / 4.55 acres) The proposed residential development component of the plan of subdivision has an overall density of approximately 43 units per net residential hectare. Please see Schedule ‘B’ – Draft Plan of Subdivision, attached. The Zoning By-law Amendment application (RZ 17-11) is proposing to rezone the subject lands from Agricultural (A1) to: Mixed Density Residential with Exceptions (RMD-X) zone for all residential dwelling units; General Commercial with Exceptions (C-X) zone for the commercial and transit hub blocks, Institutional (I) zone for the institutional block, Open Space (OS) zone for the community park and Environmental Policy Area 1 (EPA1) zones for the greenway corridor, woodlot, buffer areas, and stormwater management facility blocks.

Consultation:

In accordance with the Planning Act, a Notice of Application was mailed to all landowners within 120 m (393.7 ft) of the subject property. In addition, notice signs have been posted on the subject lands and the Notice was posted on the Town’s website and advertised in the Caledon Citizen, Caledon Enterprise and newspapers on December 21, 2017.

Notice of this Public Meeting was mailed to all landowners within 120 metres of the subject property and was advertised in the Caledon Citizen, Caledon Enterprise and Brampton Guardian newspapers on February 8, 2018.

The subject applications were most recently circulated to external agencies and internal departments for review and comment on January 5, 2018. Comments received are briefly outlined below for your information:

• Dufferin Peel Catholic District School Board and Peel District School Board: Both school boards have assessed the student yield anticipated to be generated by the proposed development in conjunction with their current student accommodation conditions of existing schools within their catchment areas for where the proposal is located. Both school boards have requested standard conditions of draft approval related to student accommodation and associated warning clauses to be included in all offers of purchase and sale of residential lots within the plan until permanent school sites for the Mayfield West Phase 2 area have been completed.

• Ministry of Transportation (MTO): The Ministry has no objection in principle with the proposed plan of subdivision and amendment to the zoning by-law. All above and below ground structures (including but not limited to, frontage roads, fire routes, stormwater management facilities [ponds/drainage channels], retaining walls and servicing/utilities) must be setback a minimum of 14.0m from all MTO property limits. These setback requirements should be implemented in the amending Zoning By-law. The plan should also show the Ministry’s 14.0m setback from the MTO right-of-way limits. The applicant should be aware that anything within

Page | 2 of 7 Public Meeting Information Report Community Services Department – Planning and Development this limit cannot be vital to the operations of the site should these lands be required by MTO in the future for highway purposes. Noise Attenuation features (e.g. earth berms) must be contained within the subject lands and setback a minimum of 0.3m from all ministry property limits. All references to a Spine Road connection to Highway 410/10/Hurontario Street should be removed from all plans and reports. A Spine Road connection to the highway has not received MTO approval.

• Orangeville Railway Development Corporation (ORDC): The site includes the ORDC Rail Corridor and as such is to be reviewed for consistency with the Policy on the Environmental Protection of New Residential Development Adjacent to the Orangeville-Brampton Railway, adopted by the ORDC.

• Region of Peel - Public Works, Development Services: Regional staff have reviewed and recently provided comments on the second submission Community-wide Environmental Implementation Report and Functional Servicing Report (EIR/FSR) required by the Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan and await a response from the consultants. At this time, providing conditions of draft approval for this subdivision application is premature until such time as the EIR/FSR are further along in the review process in order to inform if any changes and/or additional studies will be required to the this Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law amendment. Similarly, a satisfactory Community-wide Development Staging and Sequencing Plan (DSSP) is required for review and approval in principle to inform if any changes and/or additional studies will be required to the specific applications. Regional staff have reviewed the Planning Justification Report and Community Design Plan Analysis and noted that the Planning Justification Report accurately reflects the planning policy framework that applies to this draft plan of subdivision. Regional staff have reviewed the Healthy Development Assessment submitted with the applications and have revised the overall achieved score based on a reassessment of certain healthy development standards. The revised score for the proposed development is now 36/48 (75%) instead of 46/48 (96%), which still significantly outperforms traditional greenfield development in Peel as it contains many of the design elements of a compact, healthy and complete community. Measures have been recommended to integrate additional healthy design elements that would enhance the health-promoting potential of the development and achieve in an increased score from 75% to 83%. This would earn a Gold certification being the highest possible score certification under the Region’s Healthy Development Assessment program. The northeast corner of the property was located within the MTO “Focused Analysis Area” of the GTA West Corridor Study. While the February 2018 news release from the MTO has provided a revised corridor alignment, the applicant should continue to consult MTO staff on potential impacts to the subject property associated with the proximity to the Highway 410/10/Hurontario Street interchange. A Site-Specific Development Staging and Servicing Plan (DSSP) has been reviewed by the Region. Since a response to the Community-Wide DSSP review has not yet been received, the Site Specific DSSP cannot be reviewed since conformity to the broader community-wide context is indeterminable at this time.

Page | 3 of 7 Public Meeting Information Report Community Services Department – Planning and Development The proposed institutional block (Block 253) comprises the area to be acquired by the Region of Peel to join with the property directly to the east. The Region of Peel and property owner will continue land exchange discussions to facilitate the creation and conveyance of an unencumbered ten-acre property (at minimum) for a Peel Regional Police facility. The Region has reviewed the submitted Environmental Noise Feasibility Study and supports its recommendation that a noise warning clause be prepared to address the proximity of the Brampton Flying Club for future occupants of the subdivision. The Region has reviewed the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report and provided detailed comments with respect to the proposed servicing infrastructure and financial impacts. Additional technical comments have also been provided with respect to the Region’s waste collection standards.

• Town of Caledon, Finance and Infrastructure Services – Engineering Services: Technical comments provided in review of the Geotechnical Report, Noise Feasibility Study, Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report. The comments requested minor clarifications and/or revisions to be addressed in an addendum submission. The comments also noted proposed noise mitigation measures which may not meet current Town standards for barrier heights.

• Town of Caledon, Community Services, Planning & Development – Engineering: The proposed servicing for this plan, as identified in the Functional Servicing Report, generally conforms to the overall servicing requirements outlined in the latest Mayfield West Phase 2 Community Wide Functional Servicing Report (FSR). However, the Community Wide FSR has not received formal approval from the Town, Region and Conservation Authorities and as a result, all proposed servicing requirements for the noted draft plan may still be subject to further review. Additional comments are summarized as follows:

o As a condition of draft plan approval, a detail stormwater management report shall be completed to the satisfaction of both the Town and the TRCA and will require Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) approval.

o The final design requirements for the Spine Road will ultimately be establish through the MOECC Environmental Assessment currently being undertaken by the Town.

o Where possible on local roads, all sidewalks should be located on either the north or east side of the road. As per current Town standards, local roads only require a sidewalk on one side of the road. At the detail design stage, an overall sidewalk plan shall be required for Town’s review and approval.

o All proposed street lighting shall be designed utilizing LED lighting, all in accordance with the latest Town standards.

o The Owner is required to install fibre optics communication cables along all right of ways and to each dwelling unit to support high speed internet service provision.

o Prior to draft approval, the owner is required to demonstrate how all emergency and maintenance vehicles will adequately maneuver around all proposed laneway bends.

o The Environmental Noise Feasibility Report and the Railway Vibration Study will require a peer review.

Page | 4 of 7 Public Meeting Information Report Community Services Department – Planning and Development • Town of Caledon, Community Services, Planning & Development – Zoning: Detailed comments on the draft Zoning By-law amendment for this site are premature until such time as an overall zoning framework is determined for the entire Mayfield West Phase 2 development area.

• Town of Caledon, Control Architect Review: The development proposal is substantially consistent with the land use types and objectives contained within the Mayfield West Phase 2 (MW2) Community Design Plan (CDP) and the amended MW2 Land Use Plan (OPA 222) with the following exceptions:

o The plan proposes single-detached lots reversing on to the woodlot block, whereas the CDP intends for streets being oriented to maximize the views towards natural heritage features, including single-loaded roads and window streets.

o Townhouse blocks along the Spine Road are approximately 270 to 300 metres in length and should not exceed 250 metres in order to promote better permeability for pedestrians. The addition of mid-block walkway connections should be considered.

o Certain lots flanking onto the Park block as well as other Open Space and Natural Feature areas will be considered priority lots given their higher degree of public exposure. To accommodate additional wall articulation and fenestration, additional lot frontage is recommended for these lots.

o All corner lots appear to have sufficient additional lot frontage to accommodate architectural features to comply with the requirements of the CDP for priority lots.

o The commercial block has been reduced in size from the MW2 Council-endorsed land use framework plan but conforms to the MW2 OPA 222 Land Use Plan. No demonstration plans for the layouts of this block were provided but will be detailed as part of a future site plan process. The proposed Plan of subdivision generally supports the urban design intent for this portion of the community as outlined in the MW2 CDP and MW2 OPA 222 Land Use Plan.

• Town of Caledon, Community Services – Policy & Sustainability, Heritage: The subject property is listed on the Heritage Register by means of Council resolution 2010-475. Since then, the outbuildings were removed and the farmhouse subsequently destroyed by fire in 2015. A Cultural Heritage Impact Statement (CHIS) was submitted and staff recommend that this property be removed from the Heritage Register. Further to the recommendations of this CHIS, the property’s history shall be commemorated through an interpretive plaque. The plaque shall be installed in the Park block and will be incorporated into the final design of the Park block to the approval of the Town. The developer is responsible to design, produce and install this plaque to the approval of the Heritage Resource Officer at the developer’s sole cost. The Town is in receipt of a Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment report for the subject property which recommended that the lands be cleared of further archaeological concern. The Town is also in receipt of a letter from the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport confirming that the report has been reviewed and is in compliance with provincial standards and guidelines.

• Town of Caledon, Finance & Infrastructure Services, Energy and Environment: The landowner must submit a description of a homeowner energy awareness program so that homeowners can maximize the efficiencies and overall after and energy conservation measures in their home.

Page | 5 of 7 Public Meeting Information Report Community Services Department – Planning and Development

• Town of Caledon, Community Services – Policy & Sustainability: The current Development Staging and Sequencing Plan (DSSP) indicates a maximum of 70% of the residential units may be built prior to Mayfield Road improvements (2 lanes to 6 lanes) and the Spine Road connection to Hurontario Street. The DSSP does not include any details regarding how this 70% target will be implemented within the specific subdivision applications prior to the Mayfield Road improvements or the Spine Road connection. In order to support this plan, the securement of the transit hub must be analyzed more completely, given the Growth Plan policy direction requiring transit to be a first priority for transportation planning and investment. The proposed plan only provides for a partial provision of a transit station block. A full 0.8 hectare transit station block is to be provided free and clear of encumbrances in accordance with the DSSP. The applicant is required to enter into a Financial Agreement with the Town prior to Draft Plan Approval.

• Town of Caledon, Community Services, Fire and Emergency Services: Pressurized fire hydrants are to be located and installed in accordance with Region of Peel standards.

• Town of Caledon, Corporate Services, Accessibility: The owner/applicant will be required to provide acceptable universal design housing concept options to prospective home purchasers as a condition of draft plan approval. Sidewalks within the subdivision are to be a minimum of 1.5 metres wide. Accessible features such as tactile surfaces and curb ramps are to be provided at street crossings. The subdivision is to be well illuminated, especially in areas where there are key amenities such as community mailbox areas, benches and parks/playspaces.

• Town of Caledon, Open Space Design: The following comments are intended to provide direction based on all current guiding documents and studies for Mayfield West Phase 2 (MW2). Once the MW2 documents (EIS/EIR, FSR, etc.) currently under review are approved by the Town, additional comments may apply: • All chain link fencing is to be installed on private property where required. • All trails within any blocks being conveyed to the Town are to be minimum 3.0m wide asphalt and should adhere to the most recent provincial standards including signage and nodal seating areas. • A warning clause in the Purchase and Sales Agreements should indicate that the Town will provide minimal maintenance for the stormwater pond and any approved Greenway Corridor Blocks conveyed to the Town. • The Town will not accept conveyance of Open Space blocks. It is recommended that they be incorporated into the adjacent EPA blocks. • Urban treatment features such as lookout areas and seating are to be included within the Stormwater Management block, consistent with the CDP. • Cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication will be required as per Town Finance Agreement.

Page | 6 of 7 Public Meeting Information Report Community Services Department – Planning and Development • If gateways or entry ways are being proposed, then they must be located on a separate block. The Town shall secure twice the cost of the construction value to the Town for future maintenance/replacement purposes. • A warranty buy-out option for replacement trees may be considered at time of Assumption. The wording of this clause will be finalized at time of Draft Plan Approval.

The following agencies/departments have no concerns with the applications and have requested standard conditions of draft approval: • Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. • Town of Caledon, Corporate Services, Legal Services The following agencies/departments have no concerns with the applications: • Hydro One • Town of Caledon, Finance and Infrastructure Services – Finance • Town of Caledon, Community Services - Building Services • Rogers Communications Comments from the following agencies/departments remain outstanding: • Ontario Provincial Police - Caledon Detachment • Bell Canada • Canada Post • City of Brampton • Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

Next Steps: If you wish to stay informed of the project described above, please contact the planner for this project (see contact information below). If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting or make written submissions to The Corporation of the Town of Caledon before the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision is approved or refused and/or the Zoning By-law Amendment is adopted, the person or public body is not entitled to appeal the decision of The Corporation of the Town of Caledon to the Ontario Municipal Board. If a person or public body does not make oral submissions at a public meeting, or make written submissions to The Corporation of the Town of Caledon before the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision is approved or refused and/or the Zoning By-law Amendment is adopted, the person or public body may not be added as a party to the hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Municipal Board unless, in the opinion of the Board, there are reasonable grounds to do so. Contact: For further information, please contact Brandon Ward, Senior Development Planner at 905-584-2272 ext. 4283 or [email protected].

Attachments: • Schedule A: Location Map with Aerial Photograph • Schedule B: Draft Plan of Subdivision

Page | 7 of 7 Schedule 'A' to Public Meeting Report 21T-17007 & RZ 17-11

ROYAL VALLEY DR

LIVINGSTON DR

HUTCHINSON FARM LANE410 SHIGHWAY SNELCREST DR

VALLEYWOOD BLVD HIGHWAY 410 N

GARDENIA WAY

RAIL LINE RR

DONHERB CRES

HURONTARIO ST ¯ MAYFIELD RD

Location Map for Proposed Zoning By-law LOCATION MAP Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11 Caledon 410 Developments Limited Date: February 2018

12290 Hutchison Farm Lane & 0 McLaughlin Road File No.: 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11 Part of Lot 19, Concession 1 (CHING) NC. I Q O N S U L T A C .(<3/$1 2FW 6HSW E V L O P M N T SSOCIATES D +,*+:$<

A

A N D +85217$5,2675((7 L '$7(BBBBBBBBBBBBB '$7(BBBBBBBBBBBBB L A N E R S, P CHNARR & E G I O N A L S

& R 2%5<5$,/:$< LEN R B A N U SUITE 700 10 KINGSBRIDGE GARDEN CIRCLE, MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, L5R 3K6 TEL (905) 568-8888 FAX 568-8894 www.gsai.ca 17-11 G RZ

& 0F/$8*+/,152$' 72:12)&$/('21 /$1'6 ),/(7BBBBB& MAYFIELD WEST PHASE 2 68%-(&7 2/6 WEST OF HURONTARIO STREET PART OF LOT 19, CONCESSION 1, 5(*,21$/081,&,3$/,7<2)3((/ [ 6FDOH ),(/'*$7('(9(/230(176 1RYHPEHU 21T-17007 :+((/$%5$725:$<68,7($ -$&.(,6(1%(5*(5$62 7+20$66$/% -'%$51(6/,0,7(' &$/('21'(9(/230(176/7'

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eport  81,76  DF  $5($ Staff +,*+:$< to            KD    $5($ 'B'                   

    +,*+:22'52$'

 Schedule /276%/2&.6 +85217$5,2675((7  727$/    

/$1'86(

FUTURE COMMERCIAL FUTURE

%/2&.

727$/$5($

FUTURE

&200(5&,$/

D DF

KD DF

EMPLOYMENT FUTURE :$/.:$<%/2&. 72:1+286(6P  75$16,7+8%    P52: P/HQJWK &200(5&,$/    23(163$&( P5(6(59( P52: P/HQJWK P52: P/HQJWK 6:0321' P52: P/HQJWK *5((1:$<&255,'25 %$&.72%$&.72:1+286(6P  5($5/$1(72:1+286(6P  '(7$&+('P  '(7$&+(':,'(6+$//2: 3$5.(19,5210(17$/32/,&<$5($    ,167,787,21$/   

P52: P/HQJWK

%/2&.

:$/.:$<

INSTITUTIONAL

%/2&.

P5(6(59(

HUB

KD DF

FUTURE

TRANSIT

%/2&.

727$/$5($

KD DF

%/2&.

KD DF

,167,787,21$/

%/2&.

727$/$5($

75$16,7+8%

P5(6(59(

KD DF KD DF

675((7 %

/$.(),(/'5'

 81,76





  81,76

%/2&.

%/2&.



  

 /$1( (



 81,76 





81,76 81,76

%/2&. 81,76

%/2&.  %/2&.

 %/2&.





SEWER EASEMENT SEWER







 

675((7 1

EXISTING



PROPOSED 7.5m SANITARY 7.5m PROPOSED

 

 

81,76

%/2&. 

81,76 81,76 RESIDENTIAL

 81,76 81,76

%/2&.



 81,76 

 81,76 %/2&. +80%(56,'($9(

%/. %/2&.

%/. %/. 81,76

%/. 







 



 675((7 0





 

81,76

81,76 

81,76 %/2&.



 %/2&.



 %/2&. 

81,76 81,76 81,76 

 81,76

 81,76 %/2&.

%/2&.



  %/.

%/.

675((7 2 %/. 

675((7 2





 

81,76

81,76 

%/2&.

81,76 

%/2&.



 %/2&.

 %/2&. 6:0321'

    81,76



KD DF 

 

FUTURE 

 %/2&. 

/$1( ' 

675((7 + 81,76 

 %/2&. 

 675((7 * 

 675((7 /

EMPLOYMENT 675((7 .

81,76 

81,76 

%/2&.

 

%/2&.

81,76

%/2&.  

/$1( %

 675((7 * 

  

81,76 

%/2&.

    



81,76



%/2&.

81,76

81,76

%/2&. 

%/2&. &2//,1*:22'$9(18(  81,76



3$5. 675((7 $  63,1(52$' KD

 %/2&.

%/2&.  DF 



81,76



%/2&.

EXISTING



675((7 .  





RESIDENTIAL  81,76 675((7 ) 81,76

81,76

%/2&. %/2&.

%/2&.

81,76

%/2&. 

 



 



 

 

 



81,76 81,76  

%/2&. %/2&. 81,76

81,76 23(1

%/2&.

%/2&.

63$&(



KD DF

 67 , 

 



 %/2&.





 

 %/2&.



675((7 & P5(6(59( 

52%(57621'$9,(6'5,9(

%8))(56 %/2&.

81,76 

%/. 81,76

%/2&. 81,76  



KD DF  %/2&.  

81,76     

%/2&. 

 

EXISTING 

%/.

WETLAND /$1( & 

81,76 :22'/27:(7/$1'6   23(1 675((7 - 

 63$&(

WOODLOT & WOODLOT  KD

DF  /$1( $ 







81,76  %/2&. (19,5210(17$/32/,&<$5($ 675((7 ( %/2&. 

81,76  %/2&. 675((7 '

%/2&. EXISTING

 %/2&. 81,76

81,76 P5(6(59(

%/2&. 9,5*,1,$'5 RESIDENTIAL

%/2&. P5(6(59(

  

 

 

  

 





PARK

KD

FUTURE

DF

%/2&.

&255,'25

*5((1/$1'

%8))(56

KD

%/2&.

%/2&.

:22'/27

DF

:(7/$1'6

23(163$&(

32/,&<$5($

KD DF

KD DF

%/2&.

&255,'25

*5((1/$1'

(19,5210(17$/

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

2%5<5$,/:$<

%/2&.

23(163$&(

KD DF

EXISTING

WETLAND

WOODLOT & WOODLOT

FUTURE

SCHOOL SECONDARY File: 265-018

12290 HUTCHINSON FARM LANE PUBLIC MEETING Zoning By-Law Amendment & Draft Plan of Subdivision

CALEDON 410 DEVELOPMENTS LTD. 12290 HUTCHINSON FARM LANE, TOWN OF CALEDON

• Zoning By-Law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision • File: 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11 • March 6, 2018 2

AERIAL CONTEXT SUBJECT LANDS FILE: 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11 32

TOWN OF CALEDON: MAYFIELD WEST PHASE 2 SECONDARY PLAN – LAND USE FILE: 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11 4

PROPOSED DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION FILE: 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11 5

12290 HUTCHINSON FARM LANE PUBLIC MEETING Zoning By-Law Amendment & Draft Plan of Subdivision

CALEDON 410 DEVELOPMENTS LTD. 12290 HUTCHINSON FARM LANE, TOWN OF CALEDON

• Zoning By-Law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision • File: 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11 • March 6, 2018 6

MAYFIELD WEST PHASE 2 SECONDARY PLAN – 2nd DRAFT DEVELOPMENT STAGING & SEQUENCING PLAN (DSSP) – TABLE 5.2.1 FILE: 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11 7

MAYFIELD WEST PHASE 2 SECONDARY PLAN – 2nd DRAFT DEVELOPMENT STAGING & SEQUENCING PLAN (DSSP) – TABLE 5.3.1 FILE: 21T-17007C & RZ 17-11 Staff Report 2018-23

Meeting Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Subject: Proposed Bell Mobility telecommunications tower, 2 Snelcrest Drive (Valleywood Fire Station), Ward 2

Submitted By: Rob Hughes, Manager, Development (West)

RECOMMENDATION

That the Town of Caledon provide concurrence for the proposed Bell Mobility telecommunications tower, 2 Snelcrest Drive (Valleywood Fire Station) to Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, and the application be endorsed subject to the following conditions: a) The applicant must construct the Tower in accordance with the following drawings: i. Topographic Plan and Site Layout Design, prepared by Sexton McKay, dated August 1, 2014; ii. L100 Landscape Plan, prepared by Strybos Barron King, dated March 13, 2015, as redlined by staff; b) The applicant must execute a Letter of Undertaking to the satisfaction of the Town and provide payment of all required fees and securities.

REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

 The application was filed by Bell Mobility on April 13, 2012 for a telecommunications tower at 2 Snelcrest Drive (Valleywood Fire Station). The proposal is for a 30 m shrouded tri-pole tower, with a fenced compound area for the associated equipment.  A Public Information Centre was conducted by the applicant on May 8, 2013 at the Snelgrove Community Centre in Brampton.  Staff reviewed the proposal and is of the opinion that the application is consistent with Provincial, Regional and local planning documents, and meets the Town’s Telecommunication Protocol for Establishing Telecommunication Facilities. Accordingly, staff recommend concurrence of the application subject to the applicant constructing the Tower as per the approved drawings; an executed Letter of Undertaking; and payment of all required fees and securities.

DISCUSSION

The Town of Caledon received a site plan application in April 2012 for a proposed telecommunications tower from Bell Mobility for 2 Snelcrest Drive, the location of the Town owned Valleywood Fire Station (Station No. 7, see Schedule “A”,“B” and “D”).

The applicant has identified the residential lands in the vicinity of Highway 410 and Hurontario Street as an underserviced cellular phone area. The original submission proposed a 25 m (82 ft) high flagpole tower, with a fenced compound area. During the

Page 1 of 4

Staff Report 2018-23

Public Information meeting, residents voiced displeasure with the proposed design. A revised proposal in September 2014 was filed for a shrouded 30 m tri-pole tower, which would allow for co-location opportunities while also having the ability to hide equipment from view. The means of how the applicant has complied with the Town’s Telecommunication Protocol is contained in Schedule “C.”

The Region of Peel Official Plan, Town of Caledon Official Plan, Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2006-50, as amended, as well as the Town of Caledon’s Telecommunication Protocol were reviewed in consideration of this application.

Ministry of Transportation (MTO) The Ministry of Transportation has advised they have no objections to the matter. The proponent is required to obtain an MTO Building and Land Use Permit prior to any construction taking place.

Region of Peel Official Plan: The subject property is located within the Rural Service Centre (Mayfield West) designation, as identified on Schedule “D”, Regional Structure. The Region of Peel has advised that they have no objection to the proposed telecommunication facility.

Town of Caledon Official Plan: The subject property is located in the Rural Service Centre of Mayfield West and is designated Institutional, on Schedule “B”, Mayfield West Land Use Plan in the Official Plan. Section 5.15 contains policies with respect to Public Uses which note that Public utilities that provide services to the general community shall be permitted in all areas. The proposed application is in keeping with these policies.

Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2006-50, as amended The subject property is zoned Institutional (I) in Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2006-50, as amended. Section 4.17 prescribes that nothing within the By-law shall prevent the use of land or prevent the installation and maintenance of a telephone or other supply or communication line (including ancillary structures), provided that the location of such has been approved by the Corporation. The proposed telecommunication facility complies with Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2006-50, as amended.

Town of Caledon, Protocol for Establishing Telecommunication Facilities A new Protocol for Establishing Telecommunication Facilities was endorsed by Council on November 24, 2015 (DP-15-093). As this application was received prior to the approval of the new Protocol, it was grandfathered and thus reviewed under the previous Telecommunication Protocol. The Protocol contains specific requirements of proposed telecommunication facilities and criteria for review by Council and staff. The applicant has made their best efforts in meeting these requirements and criteria as summarized in this report and in Schedule “C”. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed the Protocol.

Page 2 of 4

Staff Report 2018-23

Public Consultation and Information Centre As per the protocol, a sign was erected on the subject lands notifying the public of the proposal to establish a telecommunication tower on the site at least 20 days prior to the advertised Public Information Centre. The sign posted on the property in accordance with the Protocol, which included the date, location and time of the Public Information Centre.

A Public Information Centre was held on May 8, 2013 at the Snelgrove Community Centre in Brampton. Notice for the meeting was provided by mail to those who live within 500 m of the site, and within the Caledon Enterprise dated April 18, 2013. A total of 19 residents attended the meeting. Several issues/concerns were raised at the meeting, regarding proximity of the tower to residential areas, physical appearance, health concerns, property values, and co-location capacity. Changes to the design of the tower were made to address concerns raised at the Public Meeting and by staff. A clause will be placed in the Undertaking which will speak to future maintenance of the tower should it fall into any level of disrepair.

Agency/Department Circulation The subject application was circulated to external agencies and internal departments for review and comment, of which there were no objections (see Schedule “C”). The Town will require the applicant to execute a Letter of Undertaking to ensure that appropriate arrangements have been made to completely dismantle and remove the telecommunication facility from the property, once deemed redundant.

License Agreement With Bell Mobility Given the subject tower will be located on Town owned lands, a License Agreement will be required with the proponent. The proposed terms of this document are set out in a separate in-camera report due to the terms and conditions of the Agreement.

Concurrence with Conditions Since Telecommunication Facilities are regulated by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (formerly known as Industry Canada), the applicant submits an application to the Town to address the requirements of the Town’s Protocol. Council has the ability to make three decisions with respect to these towers:

1) Concurrence: The applicant has satisfactorily addressed the Protocol and there is no additional requirements or material required by the applicant. 2) Concurrence with Conditions: The applicant has satisfactorily addressed the Protocol; however, additional requirements are to be satisfied (i.e. drawing revisions and agreements). 3) Non-Concurrence: The applicant has not satisfactorily addressed the Protocol.

In the case of this proposal, staff is recommending that Council provide concurrence of the proposal subject to the following condition:

Page 3 of 4

Staff Report 2018-23

1. The applicant must construct the Tower in accordance with the following drawings: iii. Topographic Plan and Site Layout Design, prepared by Sexton McKay, dated August 1, 2014; iv. L100 Landscape Plan, prepared by Strybos Barron King, dated March 13, 2015, as redlined by staff; 2. The applicant must execute a Letter of Undertaking to the satisfaction of the Town and provide payment of all required fees and securities;

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The Financial Implications associated with this report are outlined in Confidential Staff Report 2018-7 re: A proposed or pending disposition of land by the Municipality – A portion of Town land (Ward 2).

COUNCIL WORK PLAN

The recommendation included in this Report is related to the following goals identified in the 2015-2018 Council Work Plan:

 Broadband Internet - To provide high speed internet access to each home  Infrastructure - To increase overall condition of Town’s assets for public use

ATTACHMENTS

Schedule “A” - Location Map Schedule “B” - Proposed Temporary Tower Schedule “C” - Protocol Requirements and Comment Sheet Schedule “D” - Tower Rendering

Page 4 of 4

Schedule A to Report 2018-023 Page 1 of 1

Subject Property

Site Plan Application (Telecommunication) LOCATION MAP

Town of Caledon, Valleywood Fire Hall Bell Mobility Date: March 6, 2018 Part Block 70, Plan 43M-1050 2 Snelcrest Drive File No.: SPA 12-25T Schedule B to Report 2018-023 Page 1 of 1 Schedule C to Report 2018-023 Page 1 of 4

Town of Caledon, Protocol for Establishing Telecommunication Facilities

The Town’s telecommunication protocol contains specific requirements of proposed telecommunication facilities and criteria for review by Council and staff. The applicant has made their best efforts in meeting these requirements and criteria as summarized below. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed the Protocol.

Preliminary Consultation On December 6, 2011, the applicant met with Development staff for a formal pre-consultation meeting.

Application Submission A formal site plan application with associated fees and required documentation, as per the protocol, was submitted to the Town of Caledon on April 13, 2012 and deemed complete on July 19, 2012.

Determining Sensitivity Proposals for new telecommunication facilities will be evaluated on a site by site basis to measure the sensitivity of the proposal through a variety of factors including environmental issues, visual impacts land use compatibility, and other planning matters which may be significant.

1. Transportation Corridors of Demand Within the Town there are definite transportation corridors that would be primary targets to establish telecommunication facilities. The application is not proposed along one of these corridors, however due to the proximity to Highway 410 and Hurontario Street, the Ministry has provided their comments with respect to the application, and has stated they have no concerns.

2. Site Selection - Property Ownership The Town of Caledon requests that applicants consider the use of publicly owned sites first (where possible). The applicant is proposing to locate the tower on public lands as owned by the Town (Valleywood Fire Hall).

3. Site Selection - Environmental Policy Areas (EPA) The Region of Peel and Town of Caledon Official Plans discourage telecommunication facilities from locating within lands designated Environmental Policy Area (EPA). The subject lands are not designated EPA and therefore this is not applicable.

4. Site Selection - Nature and Design of Support Structures and Antennae Where a new telecommunication facility is proposed, consideration shall be given to the nature and design of the support structure, as well as its visual impact on the community. Various options for the subject lands were considered, through the public and review process. The applicant is proposing a 30 m (98 ft) shrouded tri-pole tower which will improve telecommunication service in the area, and provide an opportunity for co-location in the future.

5. Site Selection Criteria and Report Requirements The applicant is required to provide a site selection report outlining the steps taken by the applicant to investigate all non-support structures and co-location options, and a rationale explaining why a new support structure in a particular location is the only viable alternative. The applicant is to have regard for a number of factors and their impacts which must be explained in the report. Those factors and impacts, which have not been outlined previously in the report, are briefly summarized below.

a. Location of Residential Uses and Amenity Areas The applicant acknowledges that there are residential properties within a 500 m radius of the proposed location. The nearest residence is approximately 75m (246 ft) away.

b. Location of Existing Vegetation Including Mature Tree Lines and Other Screening Features All proposed plans shall consist of native species that match in composition with existing Schedule C to Report 2018-023 Page 2 of 4

native planting adjacent to the compound, which will further blend the compound into the natural landscape. The proposed landscape plans are consistent with this approach. c. Topographical Prominence & Viewscapes The area surrounding the proposed telecommunication facility is primarily residential. The topography of the land is generally level, with the exception of earth stockpiled by MTO along Highway 410. The applicant provided simulated photographs which showed viewscapes with the tower imposed. d. Location of Private and Public Recreational Uses within View of the Proposed Location The proposed telecommunication facility is located on the Fire Hall lands, which is adjacent to the Margaret Dunn Branch of Caledon Public Library. Beyond the above, the site is not located near institutional or recreational uses. e. Any Other Potential Impacts (Public or Private Air Strips, Flight Paths, etc.) Brampton Flying Club is located north of the subject lands (east side of McLaughlin Road, south of King Street). It should be noted that Aerodrome safety is regulated by NAV Canada and Transport Canada. As part of Rogers’ Federal requirements, NAV Canada and Transport Canada will assess the proposal with respect to any potential impact of the proposed physical structure on the air navigation system and installations prior to construction. f. Height of Structure and Design The proposed tower is a 30 m tri-pole tower, with opportunity for co-location. g. Location and proximity of public roadways The proposed tower is to be located within the same property as the Valleywood Fire Hall, setback approximately 42 m from Snelcrest Drive. h. Location of any Environmental Policy Area or other natural areas The location of the proposed installation is outside of any Environmental Policy Area. i. Location within Natural Hazard Areas and Potential Off-Site Impacts The proposed site is not located within a natural hazard area. No potential off-site impacts were found in the proximity of the subject lands. Schedule C to Report 2018-023 Page 3 of 4

COUNCIL MEETING COMMENT SHEET PIC Date: May 8, 2013 Prepared: February 20, 2018 Planner: Elaine Leung, Rob Hughes

Proposed Telecommunication Facility Bell Communications Inc. 2 Snelcrest Dr Ward 2 File Number: SPA 12-25T

The following comments were received regarding the above-noted file:

TOWN OF CALEDON – DEPARTMENT COMMENTS

Community Services - Building

Comments: A Building Permit will not be required for this structure as the communication tower is a federal designated structure and is outside the jurisdiction of the Ontario Building Code Act and Regulations. There are no concerns.

Community Services, Development Section - Engineering Comments: No concerns.

Community Services, Development Section - Landscape Comments: Landscape plans are satisfactory. Securities will be taken to for landscape works proposed for the site.

Community Services, Development Section - Urban Design Comments: No concerns. Community Services, Development Section - Zoning

Comments: As per Section 4.17, nothing in this by-law shall prevent the use of land or prevent the installation and maintenance of a telephone or other supply or communication line or structure clearly ancillary to the foregoing provided that the location of such has been approved by the Corporation. Based on this section, zoning staff has no comments on the proposed telecommunication tower and associated compound.

Community Services, Policy and Sustainability Section - Heritage Comments: No concerns.

Corporate Services, Legal Services Comments: No concerns. A License Agreement will be required with the proponent, as set out in a separate in-camera report.

Corporate Services, Accessibility Comments: No concerns. Schedule C to Report 2018-023 Page 4 of 4

EXTERNAL AGENCY COMMENTS

Ministry of Transportation – Corridor Management Section Comments: The tower location is within the permit-controlled area (45m) of Hwy 410. Therefore, the proponent is required to obtain an MTO Building and Land Use Permit from this office prior to any construction taking place.

Ministry of Transportation – Policy and Planning Division Comments: The proposal is not anticipated to impact the on-going environmental assessment for the GTA West corridor study based on the data and analysis at this time.

Region of Peel

Comments: No concerns.

Schedule D to Report 2018-023 Page 1 of 1

Tower Rendering

Proposed simulation of 30m tower, provided by applicant, based on pre-construction information. Photograph taken from Valleywood Boulevard, 82 m from tower location.

Staff Report 2018-21

Meeting Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Subject: Proposed Signum Wireless telecommunications tower, 12942 Heart Lake Road (Brampton Fairgrounds), Ward 2

Submitted By: Rob Hughes, Manager of Development - West, Community Services

RECOMMENDATION

That the Town of Caledon provide concurrence for the proposed Signum Wireless Telecommunications Tower, 12942 Heart Lake Road (Brampton Fairgrounds) to Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, and the application be endorsed subject to the following conditions: a) The applicant must construct the Tower in accordance with the following drawings: i. Site Plan, prepared by Alex Marton Limited, dated February 16, 2016; ii. Grading and Sedimentation & Erosion Control Plan C1.1, dated August 24, 2016, prepared by MTE; iii. Landscape Plan L100, dated October 2017, prepared by Strybos Barron King.

b) The applicant must execute a Letter of Undertaking to the satisfaction of the Town and provide payment of all required fees and securities.

REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

 The application was filed by Signum Wireless on September 16, 2016 for a telecommunications tower on the Brampton Fairgrounds at 12942 Heart Lake Road. The proposal is for a 40 m lattice tri-pols structure.  A Public Information Centre was conducted by the applicant on April 19, 2017 at the Brampton Fairgrounds.  Staff has reviewed the proposal in conjunction with internal departments and external agencies and is of the opinion that the proposal is consistent with provincial, regional and local planning documents, meets the Town’s Protocol for Establishing Telecommunication Facilities, and recommends concurrence of the application subject to conditions regarding the applicant constructing the Tower as per the drawings outlined in this report; an executed Letter of Undertaking; and payment of all required fees and securities.

Page 1 of 4

Staff Report 2018-21

DISCUSSION

On September 16, 2016, the Town of Caledon received a site plan application for a telecommunications tower from Signum Wireless Telecommunications for lands municipally known as 12942 Heart Lake Road, being the Brampton Fairgrounds property (see Schedules “A” and B”). The purpose of the tower is to improve cellular coverage and capacity for multiple carriers in the immediate area, and will be shared infrastructure intended to be co-locatable for at least three carriers. The applicant is proposing to erect a 40 m (131 ft.) telecommunications tower along with an associated fenced and secured equipment enclosure. The tower is proposed to be located on the south side of Old School Road, west of Heart Lake Road, and accessible via an existing entrance to Fairground parking.

The Region of Peel Official Plan, Town of Caledon Official Plan, Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2006-50, as amended, as well as the Town of Caledon’s Telecommunication Protocol were reviewed in consideration of this application.

Region of Peel Official Plan The subject property is designated as Rural System on Schedule “D”, Regional Structure in the Region of Peel Official Plan. The Region has advised that they have no objection to the proposed facility, subject to confirmation the proposal will have no negative impacts on the GTA West Corridor route planning.

Town of Caledon Official Plan The subject property is designated as Prime Agricultural Area and Environmental Policy Area on Schedule “B”, Mayfield West Land Use Plan in the Town’s Official Plan (the tower proposal is located in the Prime Agricultural designation). Section 5.15 of the Plan contains policies with respect to Public Uses which note that Public utilities that provide services to the general community shall be permitted in all areas. The proposed application is in keeping with these policies.

Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2006-50, as amended The property is zoned Agricultural Exception (A1-352) and Environmental Policy Area 2 (EPA2) in Zoning By-law 2006-50, as amended (the tower proposal is located in the A1 Zone). Section 4.17 prescribes that nothing within the By-law shall prevent the use of land or prevent the installation and maintenance of a telephone or other supply or communication line (including ancillary structures), provided that the location of such has been approved by the Corporation. The proposed telecommunication facility complies with Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2006-50, as amended.

Town of Caledon, Protocol for Establishing Telecommunication Facilities A new Protocol for Establishing Telecommunication Facilities was endorsed by Council on November 24, 2015. The protocol contains specific requirements of proposed telecommunication facilities and criteria for review by Council and staff. The applicant has made their best efforts in meeting these requirements and criteria as summarized below. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed the Protocol (see Schedule “C”).

Page 2 of 4

Staff Report 2018-21

Public Consultation and Information Centre As per the protocol, a sign was erected on the subject lands notifying the public of the proposal to establish a telecommunication tower on the site at least 20 days prior to the advertised Public Information Centre. The sign posted on the property in accordance with the Protocol, which included the date, location and time of the Public Information Centre.

A Public Information Centre was held on the evening of April 19, 2017 at the Brampton Fairgrounds. Property owners within 500 metres (1,640.42 feet) of the site were notified by mail and an advertisement was placed in the Caledon Enterprise on March 30, 2017. A total of six individuals were in attendance at the Information Centre meeting. Several project specific inquiries were made, regarding location of the tower, tower height including lighting and marking, number of carriers, coverage and data speeds. Staff and the applicant have not received any correspondence from members of the public in opposition for the proposal to date.

Agency/Department Circulation The subject application was circulated to external agencies and internal departments for review and comment, of which there were no objections (see Schedule “C”). The Town will require the applicant to execute a Letter of Undertaking to ensure that appropriate arrangements have been made to completely dismantle and remove the telecommunication facility from the property, once deemed redundant.

GTA West Corridor The subject application was circulated to the Ministry of Transportation (Route Planning & Transit Imitative Office), who advised that the proposal is located with within the GTA West Corridor Focused Analysis Area. Accordingly, the subject application has been on hold pending further clarification from the Ministry on the future direction of this project. On February 9, 2018, the Ministry made an announcement on the future direction of the Corridor, now termed as the Northwest GTA Corridor Identification Study Area. The subject lands are located outside of this study area. Accordingly, the project can move forward without any further restrictions in this regard.

Concurrence with Conditions Since Telecommunication Facilities are regulated by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (formerly known as Industry Canada), the applicant submits an application to the Town to address the requirements of the Town’s Protocol. Council has the ability to make three decisions with respect to these towers:

1) Concurrence: The applicant has satisfactorily addressed the Protocol and there is no additional requirements or material required by the applicant. 2) Concurrence with Conditions: The applicant has satisfactorily addressed the Protocol; however, additional requirements are to be satisfied (i.e. drawing revisions and agreements). 3) Non-Concurrence: The applicant has not satisfactorily addressed the Protocol.

In the case of this proposal, staff is recommending that Council provide concurrence of the proposal subject to the following condition:

Page 3 of 4

Staff Report 2018-21

1. The applicant must construct the Tower in accordance with the following drawings: i. Site Plan, prepared by Alex Marton Limited, dated February 16, 2016; ii. Grading and Sedimentation & Erosion Control Plan C1.1, dated August 24, 2016, prepared by MTE; iii. Landscape Plan L100, dated October 2017, prepared by Strybos Barron King.

2. The applicant must execute a Letter of Undertaking to the satisfaction of the Town and provide payment of all required fees and securities.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

For the purposes of property tax assessment, 12942 Heart Lake Road (Pt E Lot 22 RP, Con 2 EHS) is currently assessed as Exempt ($18.49 million CVA). Therefore no property taxes are applicable.

If the proposed development were to proceed as planned, the assessed value of the property would change to reflect any development that takes place.

COUNCIL WORK PLAN

The recommendation included in this Report is related to the following goals identified in the 2015-2018 Council Work Plan:

 Broadband Internet - To provide high speed internet access to each home  Infrastructure - To increase overall condition of Town’s assets for public use

ATTACHMENTS

Schedule “A” - Location Map Schedule “B” - Proposed Temporary Tower Site Plan Schedule “C” - Comment Sheet and Protocol Comments

Page 4 of 4

Schedule A to Report 2018-021

Page 1 of 1 KENNEDYRD

Subject Property OLD SCHOOL RD #

BONNIEGLEN FARM BLVD

ARCADIA RD

LEARMONT AVE HEART HEART LAKERD KAMORI RD

MAPLE CIDER ST

TWISTLETONICEFALL ST RD FAWNRIDGE RD

LANE A ROUGEBANK AVE DOUGALL AVE ¯ FRANK1:12,241 LANE

Site Plan Application LOCATION MAP (Telecommunications) Region of Peel Agriculture Society (Brampton Farigrounds) Date: March 6, 2018

12942 Heart Lake Road File No.: SPA 16-61T

Part Lot 22, Concession 2 (Chinguacousy) Schedule B toReport2018-021 Schedule Page 1of

SIGNUM Schedule C to Report 2018-021 Page 1 of 3

Town of Caledon, Protocol for Establishing Telecommunication Facilities

The Town’s telecommunication protocol contains specific development guidelines for proposed telecommunication facilities for review by Council and staff. The applicant has made their best efforts in meeting these guidelines as summarized below. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant has satisfactorily addressed the Protocol.

Part 1 - Location and Siting Requirements

 Tower Minimization and Co-location: The proponent has advised there is a gap in wireless telecommunication infrastructure in the area of coverage needed. A review undertaken within the coverage area identified there were no existing towers, eliminating the opportunity to co-locate facilities. Accordingly, a new facility is required, which is being designed to accommodate co- location (upwards of three carriers).

 Environmental and Heritage: The tower is not proposed for an area that is designated in the Official Plan as Environmental Policy Area and there are no environmental concerns. Likewise, there are no heritage concerns with the location.

 Transportation Corridors: With the February 9, 2018 MTO announcement that the subject lands were identified as being outside of the future GTA West corridor study area, there are no further concerns about the proposal being located in a future transportation corridor.

 Locational Criteria: The proposed tower is located in an agricultural area, away from settlement areas and any residential clusters, and not within a prominent vista or gateway. Attempts to locate the tower within the cluster of fairground buildings on the site were deemed to be unsatisfactory by the fairground operators. No vegetation will be lost through development of the tower and the immediate area offers no topographical prominence. The tower will be set back 20 m south of Old School Road, being 120 m east of Heart Lake Road. The closest residential building is 130 away, fronting Heart Lake Road.

Part 2 - Development and Design Preferences

 Style and Structure: As noted above, the tower will be constructed to accommodate co-location opportunities. The design, being 40 m in height, is proposed to be a lattice tri-pole structure, a common form. No guy wires and cables are proposed.

 Buffering and Screening: The subject tower will include a secured fenced 144 sq m compound with an associated equipment shelter and gravel access road. The views from all directions, in particular from Old School Road, are proposed to be landscaped with year round coverage. Several existing trees in close proximity will be retained and preserved.

 Parking and Access: Access will be provided to an existing access point that serves the fairground property. Satisfactory room is provided for the parking of service vehicles.

 Equipment Structures: The proposal will include one small equipment shelter within the compound, which will be partially screened from view by landscaping.

 Colours and Lighting: All proposed components of the tower are proposed to be silver/grey in colour, with no illumination beyond what is required for flight navigation by Transport Canada (at this time not required).

 Signage: No signage is proposed for the facility.

 Rooftop Antenna Systems and Fibre Optic Cables: Not applicable. Schedule C to Report 2018-021 Page 2 of 3

COUNCIL MEETING COMMENT SHEET PIC Date: April 19, 2017 Prepared: February 20, 2018 Planner: Elaine Leung, Rob Hughes

Proposed Telecommunication Facility Signum Wireless 12942 Heart Lake Road (Brampton Fairgrounds) Ward 2 File Number: SPA 16-61T

The following comments were received regarding the above-noted file:

TOWN OF CALEDON – DEPARTMENT COMMENTS

Community Services - Building

Comments: A Building Permit will not be required for this structure as the communication tower is a federal designated structure and is outside the jurisdiction of the Ontario Building Code Act and Regulations. There are no concerns.

Community Services, Development Section - Engineering Comments: No concerns.

Community Services, Development Section - Landscape Comments: Landscape plans are satisfactory. Securities will be taken to for landscape works proposed for the site.

Community Services, Development Section - Urban Design Comments: From and urban design perspective, it was preferred that the proposed tower be located amongst the complex of buildings connected with fairground operations. In understanding if this was a possible option, Signum representatives advised that Fairground representatives were not interested in this arrangement. Community Services, Development Section - Zoning

Comments: As per Section 4.17, nothing in this by-law shall prevent the use of land or prevent the installation and maintenance of a telephone or other supply or communication line or structure clearly ancillary to the foregoing provided that the location of such has been approved by the Corporation. Based on this section, zoning staff has no comments on the proposed telecommunication tower and associated compound.

Community Services, Policy and Sustainability Section - Heritage Comments: No concerns.

Corporate Services, Legal Services Comments: No concerns. Schedule C to Report 2018-021 Page 3 of 3

Corporate Services, Accessibility Comments: No concerns.

EXTERNAL AGENCY COMMENTS Ministry of Transportation – Policy and Planning Division Comments: Ministry staff advised in originally reviewing the application that it was located within the GTA West Corridor Focused Analysis Area. Accordingly, the application was placed on hold pending further clarification on this matter. With the February 9, 2018 announcement, the subject lands were identified as being outside of the future study area. Accordingly, the proposal can move forward without any further restrictions in this regard.

Region of Peel

Comments: No concerns.

Toronto Region Conservation Authority Comments: No concerns.

Heritage Caledon Report Monday, February 12, 2018 9:30 a.m. Palgrave Room, Town Hall

Members: Chair: J. Crease Vice-Chair: B. McKenzie Councillor J. Downey (absent) B. Early-Rea J. LeForestier V. Mackie M. Starr D. Paterson S. Norberg H. Mason

Town Staff: Heritage Resource Officer: S. Drummond Council Committee Coordinator: D. Lobo Heritage Coordinator: P. Vega

CALL TO ORDER

The meeting was called to order at 9:33 a.m.

DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST – none.

RECEIPT OF MINUTES

The minutes from the January 15, 2018 Heritage Caledon meeting were received.

With general consensus from the Committee, the Chair altered the agenda to add the 200th Anniversary of the Ajetance Purchase (Treaty 19) under Projects/Events.

PRESENTATION

Carolyn Crawford, Secretary, Culinary Historians of Canada and Resident, Town of Caledon provided a presentation regarding Proposed Adaptive Reuse of a Heritage Structure – Cook Log Home. She provided details of her experience participating and organizing historic cooking events. Ms. Crawford provided an overview of her proposal to reuse a log home to provide a space for hands-on historic cooking and to build a cookbook collection.

Members of the Committee asked questions regarding the proposed reuse, property, its features, property ownership, a succession plan, cookbooks, property designations, project partners, and received responses from Ms. Crawford and staff.

Chair J. Crease thanked Ms. Crawford for her presentation.

The Committee recessed from 10:33 a.m. to 10:50 a.m. Heritage Caledon Report Monday, February 12, 2018 Page 2 of 3

REGULAR BUSINESS

1. Request to Remove Structure on Listed Property

a. Staff Report – Notice of Intent to Remove Structures from Listed Property at 16955 Mount Pleasant Road (Ward 4)

Chair J. Crease provided an overview of the request to remove the structure. A Member of the Committee noted what the structure materials will be used for once removed.

Moved by: H. Mason HC-2018-4

That the owner’s request to remove the two log structures from the property at 16955 Mount Pleasant Road for re-use elsewhere be supported; and

That the property at 16955 Mount Pleasant Road be removed from the Heritage Register following completion of the removal of the log cabins. Carried.

With general consensus from the Committee, the Chair altered the agenda to discuss the 2018 Ontario Heritage Conference.

2. 2018 Ontario Heritage Conference

Members discussed the costs and logistics to have a Member of the Committee attend.

The Committee agreed that funds of approximately $1,200 be allocated to send one Member of the Committee to the 2018 Ontario Heritage Conference.

3. 2018 Budget

J. Crease provided information about the Committee’s 2018 budget. Members of the Committee proposed and discussed costs for printing and lamination of 150 for 150 posters. Funds for Committee projects such as the 2018 Speaker Series were discussed.

4. Projects/Events Update

a. Designated Property Plaque Presentations

Staff provided an update on pending property designations. Members of the Committee discussed scheduling the completed property designation presentation.

b. 2018 Speaker Series

The Committee discussed dates and times to hold the speaker series and logistics.

Heritage Caledon Report Monday, February 12, 2018 Page 3 of 3 c. 150 for 150 Project

This item was discussed above under the 2018 Budget.

d. Heritage Week

Chair J. Crease confirmed the volunteer schedule for providing tours at Alton Mill.

e. 200th Anniversary of the Ajetance Purchase (Treaty 19)

A Member of the Committee provided information regarding the 200th anniversary of the Ajetance Purchase (Treaty 19). Interest was expressed to incorporate recognition of this anniversary into the Committee’s Caledon Day activities.

Staff advised that further consideration should be given to this item.

The Committee agreed to place the item on a future agenda.

ADJOURNMENT

On motion by D. Paterson, the meeting adjourned at 11:58 a.m. Memorandum

Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2018

To: Members of Council

From: Margherita Bialy, Community Planner, Community Services

Subject: Palgrave Estate Residential Community Policy Review – Project Status and Release of Discussion Paper

The purpose of this memo is to provide Council with an update on the Palgrave Estate Residential Community Policy Review and to release a copy of the Palgrave Estate Residential Community Policy Review: Discussion Paper. This update will consist of a review of the four phases of the project, a discussion of the key project milestones achieved to date, and a summary of key preliminary issues, opportunities and themes from the Discussion Paper.

The Palgrave Estate area has been planned as a rural estate residential community for over 40 years. The policy review was initiated to refine the current Official Plan policy framework within the Palgrave Estate Residential Community. More specifically, the policy review will evaluate policies and identify improvements, refinements or needed changes to address a range of issues and opportunities. The study commenced in April 2017. The policy review is being undertaken in four phases:

 Phase 1: Background Analysis includes a review and analysis of background information, including the policy context and recent development trends, to identify major issues/opportunities to be addressed.  Phase 2: Policy Alternatives and Preferred Options considers opportunities, improvements, growth forecasts and evaluation of land use alternatives to select preferred options.  Phase 3: Initial Policy Formulation includes the preparation of draft Official Plan polices to implement the recommended directions.  Phase 4: Final Policy Formulation includes refinement and finalization of the Official Plan policies for Council’s consideration.

The project is currently in Phase 2. The engagement component of the study proposed two public information meetings and a statutory public meeting.

During Phase 1, the first community engagement event was held on June 1, 2017. The purpose of the event was to introduce the study to the public and stakeholders through a public information meeting format. The public was engaged through a workshop exercise which aimed at confirming what residents and participants value about the Palgrave Estate community. Phase 1 ended with the completion of the Palgrave Estate Residential Community Policy Review: Discussion Paper. The purpose of this report was to identify and summarize data, background information and the relevant current policy and regulatory framework. The report also identifies preliminary key issues, opportunities and themes to be considered for further analysis. Some key themes, issues and opportunities identified based on the background review and consultation undertaken to date include the following:  The overall function of the Palgrave Estate Residential Community should be maintained as a low-density estate format with the provision of alternative forms of housing that maintain the low density format and can contribute to housing choices.  The protection of natural features, functions and the characteristics of the landscape have been raised as a clear theme.  The objective of creating conservation-minded development formats that are well-integrated into the natural landscape and respectful or the ecological integrity of the natural systems should be more clearly stated.  Update servicing provisions with respect to Regional servicing requirements.  Agricultural uses have long been a part of the PERC and this should be recognized by the policy. This includes many operating farms as well as other uses, including the Caledon Equestrian Park. Some of these uses will continue to operate over the horizon of the Official Plan. This Discussion Paper is final and is posted on the project webpage (www.caledon.ca/palgraveestatepolicy). Background information from Phase 1 was used to further develop and analyze policy and data in Phase 2.

During Phase 2, the second community engagement event was held on February 8, 2018. The purpose of the event was to present the information collected from the first community meeting, to provide a status update and discuss next steps. The meeting was an open house format whic h gave residents an opportunity to speak with the project team and Town Staff on a one-on-one basis. Phase 2 also involves the preparation of a discussion paper. The purpose of this discussion paper will be to

identify specific issues/opportunities regarding the Palgrave Estate policy framework, and evaluate the options for addressing issues and opportunities. This draft report will be finalized in Spring 2018.

Building on the work completed, Phase 3 and Phase 4 will implement the recommended directions through the preparation of a draft Official Plan Amendment which will be presented at the statutory public meeting planned for late Spring/early Summer 2018. The final Recommendation Report and Official Plan Amendment will be brought forward to Council in 2019.