Evidence of Newell's Shearwater Breeding in Puna District, Hawaii

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evidence of Newell's Shearwater Breeding in Puna District, Hawaii J. Field Ornithol., 68(1 ) :26-32 EVIDENCE OF NEWELL'S SHEARWATER BREEDING IN PUNA DISTRICT, HAWAII MICHELLE H. REYNOLDS AND GEORGE L. RITCHOTTE U.S. GeologicalSurvey BiologicalResearch Division PacificIslands Ecosystem Research Center P. 0. Box 44 Hawaii Field Station Hawaii National Park, Hawaii 96718 USA Abstract.---Nocturnalsurveys using auditory cues and night-visionequipment were conduct- ed during the seabirdbreeding seasonin 1993 to determine use of inland areasin the Puna District,Hawaii by Newell'sShearwater (Puffinus auricular•s newdli). Two hundredsix•/ Newell'sShearwater auditory or visualdetections were made during 275 surveyhours from 23 Jul. 1993-20 Sep. 1993. Mean detectionrates were 1.26 birds/h at Puulena Crater (n = 160 Newell's Shearwaterdetections), 1.05 birds/h at Heiheiahulu (n = 99) and 0.04 birds/ h at Puu Kaliu (n = 2). Vocalizingpeaked between 50 and 90 min after sunsetand 4 h before sunrise.Although night-vision equipment was used on mostof the seabirdsurveys, only4% of seabirdswere detected •%uall¾. Two road-killedbirds collected in Punain June 1993,and four burrowslocated in PuulenaCrater after the 1994breeding season, provided additional evidenceof breeding. EVIDENCIA DE QUE PUFFINUS AURICULARIS NEWELLI ESTA ANIDANDO EN HAWAII Sinopsis.--Durantela •poca reproductivade 1993 se trabaj6de noche,utilizando equipo audRivoespecializado ¾de visi6nnocturna, para determinarsi el pamperoPuffinus aur•cu- lar•snewelli se estabareproduciendo en el distritoPuna de Hawaii.Del 23 dejulio al 20 de septiembrese 11egaronahacer 260 deteccionesauditivas o visualesen 275 h de estudio.La tasade detecci•n rue de 1.26 pamperos/h en el crater Puulena (n = 160 detecciones),1.05 pamperos/hen Heiheiahulu (n = 90) ¾0.04 pamperos/hen Puu Kaliu (n = 2). E1pico de las vocalizacionesocurri• entre 50 ¾90 minutosdespu•s de la puestadel sol¾ cuatro horas antesdel amanecer.Tan s•1oel 4% de las avesrueton observadasutilizando el equipoes- pecializado.Dos avesmuertas pot colisiones¾ coleccionadas en junio de 1993 en Puna¾ cuatromadrigueras 1ocalizadas en el craterPuulena, luego de la •poca reproductivade 1994, proveenevidencia adicional de que las avesse estanreproduciendo en la localidad. The Newell's Shearwater, or 'A' o, Puffinus auricularis newdli, is a threatened procellariid (US Fish and Wildlife Service 1992) known to breed on the Islandsof Kauaiand Hawaii, and suspectedto breed on the other main Hawaiian Islands (Pratt et al. 1987). Newell's Shearwater was thought to be extinct after 1894, but in 1954 a specimenwas collected on Oahu (King and Gould 1967) and a breedingcolony was found on Kauaiin 1967 (Sincockand Swedberg1969). During the April-November breeding season,adults and subadultsfor- age offshorefor fish, plankton, and squid (Harrison 1990). Parentsfeed young after sunsetand return to sea before dawn (Ainley and Podolsky 1993, Day and Cooper 1995). Newell'stypically nest coloniallyin sloped terrain between150-700 m elevation (US Fish and Wildlife Service1983); theydig burrowsin areasdominated by uluhe fern (Dicranopterislinearis). The current nesting range is probably much more restricted than it was historically,due to increasedpredation pressureand land use changes 26 Vol.68, tqo. 1 Newell'sShearwater in Hawaii [27 (Banko 1980). The breeding biology of Newell's is discussedin more detail by Harrison (1990), Ainley and Podolsky(1993), and Ainley et al. (in press). Degradationor lossof habitat causedby the invasionof exotic vegeta- tion, cinder mining, and urbanizationhas rendered many former colony sites unsuitable for nesting (US Fish and Wildlife Service 1983). Such habitat degradationalso exposes ground-nesting seabirds to a higher level of predation by introduced, feral, and domestic animals (US Fish and Wildlife Service 1983). Cats (Felis catus)and mongooses(Herpestes auro- punctatus)take advantageof fragmentedhabitats by hunting along forest edgesand trails (Ehrlich et al. 1992). Introduced Barn Owls (Tyt0 alba) prey on many nativebirds (Byrd and Telfer 1980, Snetsingeret al. 1994), and were observedhunting in Newell'scolony sites (Reynolds et al. 1994) and predating nestlingseabirds (Ainley et al. 1995). Bright lights are known to cause fledglingsand some adult birds to become disorientedwhile flying to or from the ocean and nest sites.Ha- waiian seabirdmortality due to fall out and collisionswith utility structures is well documented(Ainley et al. 1995, Day and Cooper 1995, Reed et al. 1985, Telfer et al. 1987). Many birds die of injuries receivedin the colli- sion, are struck by automobiles,or are killed by feral or domesticanimals. On Kauai, approximately 1500 fledging Newell's Shearwatersare recov- ered annually by the SaveOur ShearwaterProgram (Telfer 1979, 1992; Telfer et al. 1987). On the island of Hawaii, no information exists on the current distri- bution of Newell's Shearwater.Objectives of this studywere to determine the presenceand distribution of the speciesin the Puna District, Hawaii, to locate breeding colonies,and to documentcolony attendance patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS Selected sites in the district of Puna on the eastern (windward) side of Hawaii, were monitored from 28 Jul.-21 Oct. 1993 (19ø22'N,155ø11'W; Fig. 1). Observersbegan surveysat sunsetuntil 2130 h and from 0400 h until sunrise. Continuous sunset-to-sunrisesurveys were also conducted periodically.One observerper study site identified speciesand number of detectionsat potential colony sitesand bright light sources.Each New- ell's vocalization,which consistsof a call series,was counted as a separate detection.Night-vision goggles (US Army model AN/PVS-5A) were used to help detect seabirdsentering colony areas.We recorded the compass bearingsof each seabird detection, as well as current weather and moon phase.We minimized disturbanceto potentially nestingbirds by not cut- ting trails, restrictingthe use of bright lights, and keeping quiet. Burrow searcheswere conducted 14 Dec. 1994. With a support team, we rapelied into Puulena Crater in areaswhere Newell'sShearwaters had been heard during the breeding season.We searchedareas within 1-2 m of two 45-m ropes placed 80-m apart on the SW crater wall. Puulena Crater, with a rim elevation of 189 m, is a volcanic pit crater, approxi- mately90-m deep with wallssloping to 78ø. Vegetation on the craterwalls 28] M. H. Reynoldsand G. L. Ritchotte J.Field Ornithol. Winter 1997 ß Detections/possibleflyway L ß[] BreedingRoad-killed colonyNewell's P U NA Pahoa Pahoa - KaJapana H•hway "'-.. Puule• Cm•r • Puu Kallu Helhelalulu (' ß / ......,, ....• J /! t HAWAII NATIONAL PARK J 10km I FIGURE 1. Locations of Newell's Shearwater detections in the Puna district, Hawaii, 1993. is predominantlyuluhe with an open canopyconsisting of hala (Pandanus tectorius)and ohia (Meterosiderospolymorpha) trees. Some sheer areas were not vegetated. RESULTS Our surveysconfirmed the presenceof the Newell's Shearwaterin the Puna District at three locations surveyed (Fig. 1). Repeated activitywas identified at two sites believed to be active nesting colonies (hereafter called colony sites). Newell's Shearwaterswere heard from 2• Jul.-10 Vol.68, No. 1 Newell'sShearwater in Hawaii [29 T•LE 1. Summaryof Newell'sShearwater detections during 275 surveyhours in the Puna District, Hawaii, 1993. Survey dateswith Number of Location Newell's detections detections a Detections/h Heiheiahulu 19 August 32 11.64 23 August 20 6.15 26 August 2 visual 0.67 31 August 15 (1 visual) 4.29 1 September 3 1.53 2 September 1 0.29 8 September 2 0.34 9 September 2 1.00 10 September 3 0.95 16 September 4 1.18 20 September 6 (1 visual) 1.69 Total -- 99 Mean = 1.05 Puulena Crater 23 July 13 14.18 28 July 7 (6 visual) 3.23 29 July 2 (1 visual) 1.00 9 August 5 3.16 10 August 7 1.00 25 August 2 0.35 26 August 19 71.25 9 September 89 23.52 10 September 16 14.77 Total = 160 Mean-- 1.26 Puu Kaliu 1 September 2 0.67 Mean = 0.04 a Each call series was recorded as an individual detection. Sept. 1993 at Puulena Crater and at Heiheiahulu (elevation330 m) from 19 Aug.-20 Sept.1993 with 260 detectionsduring 275 surveyhours. Mean detection rates were 1.26 birds/h at Puulena Crater, 1.05 birds/h at Hei- heiahulu and 0.04 birds/h at Puu Kaliu (elevation 305 m). There were 160 detections at Puulena and 99 at Heiheiahulu. The low numbers de- tected at Puu Kaliu may be due to surveysconducted late in the breeding seasonstarting on 31 Aug. 1993 (Table 1). Follow-up surveysconducted on 1 and 3 Jun. 1994 discoveredadditional Newell's Shearwatersat Puu Kaliu and south of Puu Kaliu (M. Reynolds,unpubl. data). Newell'swere identified primarily by vocalizations;only 4% were de- tected visually(Table 1). Road-killsand auditory detectionsmade prior to our surveyssuggested flight corridors to nesting areas (Fig. 1), below Puu Kaliu Crater and above Kikala near the water tank on the Pahoa- Kalapana Highway (L. Katahira, Hawaii VolcanoesNational Park, pers. comm.). Two Newell's Shearwater carcasseswere collected on the Pahoa- Kalapana Highway in June 1993; the causeof death, severetrauma, was determined by necropsy(C. Atkinson,Hawaii Field Station,pers. comm.). Most Newell's were detected 50-90 rnin after sunset (Fig. 2). Morning detectionspeaked 4 h before sunrise(Fig. 3). Mean detectionrates were 30] M. H. Reynoldsand G. L. Ritchotte J.Field Ornithol. Winter 1997 • 2o 10• 30 50[ 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 Minutes after sunset FIGURE2. Newell'sShearwater evening activity patterns from vocalizationsheard between July and October, 1993. 0.34 birds/h during the morning and 1.15 birds per/h during the eve- ning. Detections dropped steadily as the breeding seasonprogressed. Monthly mean detection rates were 3.4 birds/h in July, 3.2 birds/h in August, 1.0 birds/h in Septemberand 0 birds in October 1993. Four inactive burrows were located at Puulena Crater on 16 Dec. 1994. Burrows were found from 10-50 m below the crater's rim. 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 270 Minutes before sunrise FIGURE3.
Recommended publications
  • Behavior and Attendance Patterns of the Fork-Tailed Storm-Petrel
    BEHAVIOR AND ATTENDANCE PATTERNS OF THE FORK-TAILED STORM-PETREL THEODORE R. SIMONS Wildlife Science Group, Collegeof Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 USA ABSTRACT.--Behavior and attendance patterns of breeding Fork-tailed Storm-Petrels (Ocea- nodromafurcata) were monitored over two nesting seasonson the Barren Islands, Alaska. The asynchrony of egg laying and hatching shown by these birds apparently reflects the influence of severalfactors, including snow conditionson the breedinggrounds, egg neglectduring incubation, and food availability. Communication between breeding birds was characterized by auditory and tactile signals.Two distinct vocalizationswere identified, one of which appearsto be a sex-specific call given by males during pair formation. Generally, both adults were present in the burrow on the night of egg laying, and the male took the first incubation shift. Incubation shiftsranged from 1 to 5 days, with 2- and 3-day shifts being the most common. Growth parameters of the chicks, reproductive success, and breeding chronology varied considerably between years; this pre- sumably relates to a difference in conditions affecting the availability of food. Adults apparently responded to changes in food availability during incubation by altering their attendance patterns. When conditionswere good, incubation shifts were shorter, egg neglectwas reduced, and chicks were brooded longer and were fed more frequently. Adults assistedthe chick in emerging from the shell. Chicks became active late in the nestling stage and began to venture from the burrow severaldays prior to fledging. Adults continuedto visit the chick during that time but may have reducedthe amountof fooddelivered. Chicks exhibiteda distinctprefledging weight loss.Received 18 September1979, accepted26 July 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Sooty Shearwater Puffinus Griseus Few Changes in Bird Distribution
    110 Petrels and Shearwaters — Family Procellariidae Sooty Shearwater Puffinus griseus birds are picked up regularly on the county’s beaches. Few changes in bird distribution have been as sud- Winter: From December to March the Sooty Shearwater den and dramatic as the Sooty Shearwater’s deser- is rare—currently much scarcer than the Short-tailed tion of the ocean off southern California. Before the Shearwater. Before 1982, winter counts ranged up to 20 1980s, this visitor from the southern hemisphere off San Diego 18 January 1969 (AFN 23:519, 1969). Since was the most abundant seabird on the ocean off San 1987, the highest winter count has been of three between San Diego and Los Coronados Islands 6 January 1995 (G. Diego in summer. After El Niño hit in 1982–83 and McCaskie). the ocean remained at an elevated temperature for the next 20 years, the shearwater’s numbers dropped Conservation: The decline of the Sooty Shearwater by 90% (Veit et al. 1996). A comparison confined followed quickly on the heels of the decline in ocean to the ocean near San Diego County’s coast would productivity off southern California that began in the likely show a decline even steeper. late 1970s: a decrease in zooplankton of 80% from 1951 to 1993 (Roemich and McGowan 1995, McGowan et al. Migration: The Sooty Shearwater begins arriving in April, 1998). The shearwater’s declines were especially steep in peaks in May (Briggs et al. 1987), remains (or remained) years of El Niño, and from 1990 on there was no recov- common through September, and then decreases in ery even when the oceanographic pendulum swung the number through December.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Fall Unamagazine
    FALL 2011 • VOLUME 19 • No. 3 FOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA Cover Story 10 ..... Thanks a Million, Harvey Robbins Features 3 ..... The Transition 14 ..... From Zero to Infinity 16 ..... Something Special 20 ..... The Sounds of the Pride 28 ..... Southern Laughs 30 ..... Academic Affairs Awards 33 ..... Excellence in Teaching Award 34 ..... China 38 ..... Words on the Breeze Departments 2 ..... President’s Message 6 ..... Around the Campus 45 ..... Class Notes 47 ..... In Memory FALL 2011 • VOLUME 19 • No. 3 for alumni and friends of the University of North Alabama president’s message ADMINISTRATION William G. Cale, Jr. President William G. Cale, Jr. The annual everyone to attend one of these. You may Vice President for Academic Affairs/Provost Handy festival contact Dr. Alan Medders (Vice President John Thornell is drawing large for Advancement, [email protected]) Vice President for Business and Financial Affairs crowds to the many or Mr. Mark Linder (Director of Athletics, Steve Smith venues where music [email protected]) for information or to Vice President for Student Affairs is being played. At arrange a meeting for your group. David Shields this time of year Sometimes we measure success by Vice President for University Advancement William G. Cale, Jr. it is impossible the things we can see, like a new building. Alan Medders to go anywhere More often, though, success happens one Vice Provost for International Affairs in town and not hear music. The festival student at a time as we provide more and Chunsheng Zhang is also a reminder that we are less than better educational opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record, and Recovery of Wedge-Tailed Shearwater Ardenna Pacifica from the Andaman Islands, India S
    RAJESHKUMAR ET AL.: Wedge-tailed Shearwater 113 First record, and recovery of Wedge-tailed Shearwater Ardenna pacifica from the Andaman Islands, India S. Rajeshkumar, C. Raghunathan & N. P. Abdul Aziz Rajeshkumar, S., Raghunathan, C., & Aziz, N. P. A., 2015. First record, and recovery of Wedge-tailed Shearwater Ardenna pacifica from the Andaman Islands, India. Indian BIRDS. 10 (5): 113–114. S. Rajeshkumar, Zoological Survey of India, Andaman and Nicobar Regional Centre, Port Blair 744102, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. E-mail: [email protected] [Corresponding author.] C. Raghunathan, Zoological Survey of India, Andaman and Nicobar Regional Centre, Port Blair 744102, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. E-mail: [email protected] N. P. Abdul Aziz, Department of Environment and Forests, Andaman and Nicobar Administration, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received on 25 May 2015. edge-tailed Shearwaters Ardenna pacifica are widely Indonesia (Poole et al. 2011). distributed, and breed throughout the tropical Pacific-, We report here the recovery of a live Wedge-tailed Shearwater Wand Indian Oceans (BirdLife International 2015). Two [93] on the Andaman Islands, in May 2015; that it later died in races are recognised: A. p. pacifica breeds in the south-eastern captivity. This is the first specimen recorded for India. Remarkably, part of the northern Pacific Ocean, andA. p. chlororhyncha breeds all the previously documented records from India were also from in the tropical, and sub-tropical Indian-, and Pacific- Oceans (del May. It could be assumed that this species is a spring passage Hoyo et al. 2014). Large breeding colonies of the species exist migrant across the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, and in the on oceanic islands between latitudes 35°N and 35°S, such as Indian Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Occurrence of Flesh-Footed Shearwater (Ardenna Carneipes) in British Columbia
    Status and Occurrence of Flesh-footed Shearwater (Ardenna carneipes) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Louis Haviland. Revised: January 2017. Introduction and Distribution The Flesh-footed Shearwater (Ardenna carneipes) is a trans-equatorial migrant that breeds in the Southern Hemisphere on St Paul Island in the French Southern Territories, Lord Howe Island off Australia, islands off south-west mainland Australia, South Australia at two isolated colonies, and islands off North and South Islands of New Zealand (Onley and Scofield 2007). This species is active on eggs at their nesting colonies during the months of November and December (Onley and Scofield 2007). The Flesh-footed Shearwater mainly occurs in the subtropics over continental shelves and slopes, and occasionally in inshore waters (Onley and Scofield). Individuals also pass through the tropics and over deeper waters when on migration to the North Pacific and Indian Oceans (Brooke 2004). The majority of the population migrates to the Northern Hemisphere between May and September and returns to the Southern Hemisphere in August (Onley and Scofield 2007). Individuals have been recorded over waters of 12.9–22.9°C in the south-western Pacific Ocean (Reid et al. 2002) and over waters of 11–16°C in the northern Pacific Ocean (Reid 2010, Reid et al. 2013b). Pairs breed on islands in burrows on sloping ground in coastal forest, scrubland, or grassland (Powell et al. 2007). Nests consist of enlarged chambers at the end of burrows of 1-3 metres in length, with the entrance often covered by plant material (Waugh et al. 2014). Brooke (2004) estimated the global population to number > c.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • FEEDING ECOLOGY of the CAPE VERDEAN SHEARWATER (Calonectris Edwardsii) POPULATION of RASO ISLET, CAPE VERDE (P1-B-11)
    2nd World Seabird Conference “Seabirds: Global Ocean Sentinels” 26-30 October 2015 Cape Town, South Africa FEEDING ECOLOGY OF THE CAPE VERDEAN SHEARWATER (Calonectris edwardsii) POPULATION OF RASO ISLET, CAPE VERDE (P1-B-11) Isabel Rodrigues1,3; Nuno Oliveira 2 Rui Freitas 3 Tommy Melo1 Pedro Geraldes 2 1Biosfera I, Cabo Verde, www.biosfera1.com; 2SPEA, Portugal, www.spea.pt, 3 Universidade de Cabo Verde, www.unicv.edu.cv Raso Islet with only 5.76 km2, is an area of great importance to Cape Verdean Shearwaters as we find one of the largest colonies of the species there. The great biological value of this islet is even more remarkable for hosting very large populations of other species, such as the Brown Booby, Red-billed Tropicalbird and even the endemic Raso Lark, among others. Along with Branco Islet, also included in the Nature Reserve, both populations constitute about 75% of the nesting population of the Cape Verde islands (Fig. 1). The Cape Verde Shearwater (Procellariiformes, Procellariidae) (Fig. 2) is an endemic species of Cape Verde and has recently been separated from Calonectris diomedea species, due to their morphological and genetic differences, and pelagic habits; feeding mostly on the open sea (Hazevoet 1995). METHODOLOGY RESULTS The samples were collected between 14 October and 12 November, in two In total, 80 regurgitations from juvenile Cape Verde Shearwaters were collected; consecutive years, 2012 and 2013. We randomly obtained 80 samples of juvenile including 50 individuals sampled in 2012, and 30 individuals in 2013. regurgitation. Each juvenile was sampled only once. During or after handling, Based on knowledge of local fish populations and according to the current juveniles tend to regurgitate stomach contents without the need to resort to the description, the identified prey of Cape Verde shearwaters belonged to 5 species induced regurgitation method.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Melting and the Formation of Sedimentary Rocks on Mars, with Predictions for the Gale Crater Mound
    Seasonal melting and the formation of sedimentary rocks on Mars, with predictions for the Gale Crater mound Edwin S. Kite a, Itay Halevy b, Melinda A. Kahre c, Michael J. Wolff d, and Michael Manga e;f aDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA bCenter for Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, P.O. Box 26, Rehovot 76100, Israel cNASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, California 94035, USA dSpace Science Institute, 4750 Walnut Street, Suite 205, Boulder, Colorado, USA eDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA f Center for Integrative Planetary Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA arXiv:1205.6226v1 [astro-ph.EP] 28 May 2012 1 Number of pages: 60 2 Number of tables: 1 3 Number of figures: 19 Preprint submitted to Icarus 20 September 2018 4 Proposed Running Head: 5 Seasonal melting and sedimentary rocks on Mars 6 Please send Editorial Correspondence to: 7 8 Edwin S. Kite 9 Caltech, MC 150-21 10 Geological and Planetary Sciences 11 1200 E California Boulevard 12 Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. 13 14 Email: [email protected] 15 Phone: (510) 717-5205 16 2 17 ABSTRACT 18 A model for the formation and distribution of sedimentary rocks on Mars 19 is proposed. The rate{limiting step is supply of liquid water from seasonal 2 20 melting of snow or ice. The model is run for a O(10 ) mbar pure CO2 atmo- 21 sphere, dusty snow, and solar luminosity reduced by 23%.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical and Remote Sensing Study of Terrestrial Planets
    GEOPHYSICAL AND REMOTE SENSING STUDY OF TERRESTRIAL PLANETS A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Lujendra Ojha In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology August, 2016 COPYRIGHT © 2016 BY LUJENDRA OJHA GEOPHYSICAL AND REMOTE SENSING STUDY OF TERRESTRIAL PLANETS Approved by: Dr. James Wray, Advisor Dr. Ken Ferrier School of Earth and Atmospheric School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Joseph Dufek Dr. Suzanne Smrekar School of Earth and Atmospheric Jet Propulsion laboratory Sciences California Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Britney Schmidt School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: June 27th, 2016. To Rama, Tank, Jaika, Manjesh, Reeyan, and Kali. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks Mom, Dad and Jaika for putting up with me and always being there. Thank you Kali for being such an awesome girl and being there when I needed you. Kali, you are the most beautiful girl in the world. Never forget that! Thanks Midtown Tavern for the hangovers. Thanks Waffle House for curing my hangovers. Thanks Sarah Sutton for guiding me into planetary science. Thanks Alfred McEwen for the continued support and mentoring since 2008. Thanks Sue Smrekar for taking me under your wings and teaching me about planetary geodynamics. Thanks Dan Nunes for guiding me in the gravity world. Thanks Ken Ferrier for helping me study my favorite planet. Thanks Scott Murchie for helping me become a better scientist. Thanks Marion Masse for being such a good friend and a mentor.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • In Pdf Format
    lós 1877 Mik 88 ge N 18 e N i h 80° 80° 80° ll T 80° re ly a o ndae ma p k Pl m os U has ia n anum Boreu bal e C h o A al m re u c K e o re S O a B Bo l y m p i a U n d Planum Es co e ria a l H y n d s p e U 60° e 60° 60° r b o r e a e 60° l l o C MARS · Korolev a i PHOTOMAP d n a c S Lomono a sov i T a t n M 1:320 000 000 i t V s a Per V s n a s l i l epe a s l i t i t a s B o r e a R u 1 cm = 320 km lkin t i t a s B o r e a a A a A l v s l i F e c b a P u o ss i North a s North s Fo d V s a a F s i e i c a a t ssa l vi o l eo Fo i p l ko R e e r e a o an u s a p t il b s em Stokes M ic s T M T P l Kunowski U 40° on a a 40° 40° a n T 40° e n i O Va a t i a LY VI 19 ll ic KI 76 es a As N M curi N G– ra ras- s Planum Acidalia Colles ier 2 + te .
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Occurrence of Manx Shearwater (Puffinus Puffinus) in British Columbia
    Status and Occurrence of Manx Shearwater (Puffinus puffinus) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Louis Haviland. Introduction and Distribution The Manx Shearwater (Puffinus puffinus) is a small species of shearwater found year round along both sides of the North Atlantic Ocean (Onley and Scofield 2007). This species has breeding colonies in Iceland, France, Faeroe Island, Ireland, Scotland, England, Channel Islands, Azores Islands, Madeira Island, and the Canary Islands (Onley and Scofield 2007). In eastern North America, the Manx Shearwater breeds in Newfoundland and is found in the Gulf of St. Lawrence to the Gulf of Maine (Lee and Haney 1996). Some of these birds winter in the North Atlantic Ocean off North America from the Carolinas to Florida, but most birds are trans- equatorial migrants from July to March wintering in the South Atlantic Ocean off Brazil to Argentina and spread across the South Atlantic to South Africa (Lee and Haney 1996, Onley and Scofield 2007). The Manx Shearwater has been undergoing a somewhat mysterious range expansion over the past few decades with more and more birds turning up in the North Pacific Ocean (Roberson 1996, Mlodinow 2004). Though breeding is suspected it has yet to be proven (Mlodinow 2004). One bird was tape recorded at night in a nesting burrow on Triangle Island by Dr. Ian Jones in the summer of 1994 (Mlodinow 2004). The bird was never actually seen and the bird’s identity was left unidentified for many years (P. Jones Pers. Comm.). Another possible breeding record comes from Alaska on Middleton Island on May 12, 2005, when 2 birds were seen together possibly prospecting for a nest site (Gibson et al.
    [Show full text]