3. Cornelis De Heem 3.1. a Still Life of Flowers and Fruit Arranged on a Stone Plinth in a Garden Dyrham Park, NT 4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3. Cornelis De Heem 3.1. a Still Life of Flowers and Fruit Arranged on a Stone Plinth in a Garden Dyrham Park, NT 4 SESSION 6 (Monday 5th February and Tuesday 12th March) Dutch Golden Age Painting 1. Albert Cuyp [FB]. 1.1. The Mass at Dordecht c1650 (115 X 175cm) Oil on canvas NGA Washington 2. Jacob van Ruisdael 2.1. Windmill at Wijk c1665 (83 x 101cm) Oil on canvas Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam 3. Cornelis de Heem 3.1. A Still Life of Flowers and Fruit arranged on a Stone Plinth in a Garden Dyrham Park, NT 4. Samuel van Hoogstraten 4.1. A View through a House Dyrham Park, NT 1662 (260 x 140cm) 5. Pieter de Hooch [FB] 5.1. The Courtyard of a House in Delft National Gallery 1658 Oil on canvas (73 x 60cm) 5.2. The Golf players. National Trust, Polesdon Lacey c1660 Oil on panel (63.5 x 46.4cm) 6. Jan Vermeer [FB] 6.1. The Glass of Wine 1660 Berlin (66 x 76cm) 7. Jan Steen 7.1. The World Turned Upside Down c1623 Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna (105 X145cm) 8. Judith Leyster [FB] 8.1. Laughing Children with Cat 1629 (52 x 61cm) Oil on canva 9. Frans Hals [FB]. 9.1. The Laughing Cavalier 1624 Wallace Collection, London oil on canvas (83 x 67cm) 9.2. The Meagre Company (finished by Pieter Codde) 1637 (209 x 429 cm) Rijksmuseum Amsterdam 10. Rembrandt[FB]. 10.1. The Syndics (De Staalmeesters) 1662 Oil on canvas (191 X 279cm) 10.2. Self portrait with Two Circles 1665-9 Oil on canvas KenWood House, London (114 x 94cm) Title page – Judith Leyster self portrait Historians say that the Dutch Republic in the early 1600s had the greatest concentration of the world’s wealth either before or since. The Protestant churches were not patrons of art but there was a huge private market for paintings and there were specialist artists for landscapes, seascapes, portraits, flower, still life and genre styles; it is estimated that in this period five million paintings were sold to the Dutch public. There is some controversy among art historians about whether these paintings should be seen as primarily “realist” (in both subject matter and execution) or if they frequently come loaded with symbolism and moral messages (“seeming realism” ie. ‘to delight and instruct’). The highly selective approach by Dutch artists (eg remarkably few portrayals of the almost continuous armed conflicts) adds some weight to arguments against seeing the paintings as solely ‘realist’. The republic depended on a large fleet for both its trading wealth and in its defence against the Spaniards. In July 1646 a fleet carrying 30,000 troops gathered at Dordecht at the confluence of the Mass and the Rhine, in a show of force before peace negotiations. The early morning light of the historic scene was later captured by Albert Cuyp in The Mass at Dordecht. The provinces’ wealth also depended on increases in agricultural production by reclaiming from the sea large areas of fertile land. This was achieved by systems of dykes and canals – and by pumping water using windmills. So, the Windmill at Wijk by Jacob van Ruisdael) is given an ‘heroic’ status that dominates the landscape Still life paintings in Europe had traditionally a lowly status in the respect shown to different art types. However, the petty bourgeoisie and traders who were the ‘new market’ for paintings did not share this prejudice which allowed specialist artists in flower and other still life paintings to flourish. Many artists, such as de Heem, used the subject for a ‘vanitas’ painting, comparing the ephemeral beauty of flowers with the brevity of human life, which is why the fruits are beginning to decay and the wild garden is intruding into the picture. Samuel van Hoogstratten (a pupil of Rembrandt) had a keen interest in perspective and illusion, and this type of trompe l’oeil is sometimes called a ‘threshold’ painting because we see beyond the boundary of the image into objects and views that do not actually exist. In the 1650s, Pieter de Hooch developed a style of genre paintings, labelled as the Delft school, which involved groups of people in well-lit spacious rooms or courtyards, usually evoking quiet domestic contentment. Typical is the The Courtyard of a House in Delft, with its careful use of linear perspective and rendering of the architectural features. The tenderness of the glance between the maid and child is a reminder of the importance of careful child care in well-ordered households. In The Golf Players Hooch uses one of his favourite devices - a ‘view-through’ (or doorkijkje) picture. Vermeer’s The Glass of Wine presents an ambiguous courtship scene – probably intended as a moral warning. The man seems to be plying the woman with drink, perhaps with calculated intent; Temperance is depicted in the stained-glass window. A musical instrument, the cittern, lies on the chair with musical notebooks. Wine, a luxury imported product, was both a symbol of the new wealth (and a very important trading commodity) but also alcohol consumption could be associated with moral laxity. ‘Genre’ paintings of daily life, sometimes with a comic or tragic narrative, were extremely popular. Jan Steen seems to have enjoyed puncturing the ideal of a well-ordered Dutch home life as moral messages. In The World Turned Upside Down (or In Luxury, Look Out) he packed as many allusions to vices. Included are references to contemporary proverbs such as ‘the pig runs off with the tap’ (ie heavy drinking). The likely consequences of this behaviour are alluded to in the objects in the basket – crutches, a leper’s rattle, and switches. Judith Leyster painted mainly genre paintings exuding good cheer, or more contemplative illustrations of women’s domestic lives. She is not the only female artist to have had their work mis-attributed to a male artist – in her case to Frans Hals or her husband, Jan Molenear. Frans Hals did paint The Laughing Cavalier, a portrait of an unknown gentleman in the relaxed pose favoured in the united provinces before it became popular in the rest of Europe. The low viewpoint allows the artist to focus on the details of the splendid costume. Probably, the sitter was a member of one of the city militias, such as The Meagre Company. Group portraits were very popular, the subjects’ prominence sometimes depended on their financial contribution to the commissioning of the painting. The better examples seem to reflect the differing personalities of individuals. Rembrandt’s The Night Watch is probably the most famous example of a group portrait, but I’ve chosen The Syndics, in part, because it illustrates his skill at capturing some drama in what lesser artists might have portrayed as a rather dreary meeting of sombrely dressed bureaucrats. It is worth considering Rembrandt’s skill at portraying the heavy table cloth; the illusion of space in paintings can in part be explained by linear and atmospheric perspective but also what has been termed ‘perceptibility’ (kenlijkheyt) – using the apparent rougher texture of objects near to us, compared to a smoother appearance when further away, to give an illusion of depth. Rembrandt’s Self Portrait with Two Circles is one of about 40 self-portraits by the artist. Some of these show homage to the work of the great masters like Titian, but without the idealisation of Italian portraits. As in other late works, it in the ‘rough style’ using especially prepared paints – with no attempt to mask individual brushstrokes. Other artists admire his technique, sometimes without fully understanding how he was able to manipulate paint so successfully. Rembrandt faced financial problems in later life and there is an air of sadness to these later self-portraits of the aging artist which may be part of their power for U3A members! © Patrick Imrie 2019 .
Recommended publications
  • The Wallace Collection — Rubens Reuniting the Great Landscapes
    XT H E W ALLACE COLLECTION RUBENS: REUNITING THE GREAT LANDSCAPES • Rubens’s two great landscape paintings reunited for the first time in 200 years • First chance to see the National Gallery painting after extensive conservation work • Major collaboration between the National Gallery and the Wallace Collection 3 June - 15 August 2021 #ReunitingRubens In partnership with VISITFLANDERS This year, the Wallace Collection will reunite two great masterpieces of Rubens’s late landscape painting: A View of Het Steen in the Early Morning and The Rainbow Landscape. Thanks to an exceptional loan from the National Gallery, this is the first time in two hundred years that these works, long considered to be companion pieces, will be seen together. This m ajor collaboration between the Wallace Collection and the National Gallery was initiated with the Wallace Collection’s inaugural loan in 2019 of Titian’s Perseus and Andromeda, enabling the National Gallery to complete Titian’s Poesie cycle for the first time in 400 years for their exhibition Titian: Love, Desire, Death. The National Gallery is now making an equally unprecedented reciprocal loan to the Wallace Collection, lending this work for the first time, which will reunite Rubens’s famous and very rare companion pair of landscape paintings for the first time in 200 years. This exhibition is also the first opportunity for audiences to see the National Gallery painting newly cleaned and conserved, as throughout 2020 it has been the focus of a major conservation project specifically in preparation for this reunion. The pendant pair can be admired in new historically appropriate, matching frames, also created especially for this exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserve Number: E14 Name: Spitz, Ellen Handler Course: HONR 300 Date Off: End of Semester
    Reserve Number: E14 Name: Spitz, Ellen Handler Course: HONR 300 Date Off: End of semester Rosenberg, Jakob and Slive, Seymour . Chapter 4: Frans Hals . Dutch Art and Architecture: 1600-1800 . Rosenberg, Jakob, Slive, S.and ter Kuile, E.H. p. 30-47 . Middlesex, England; Baltimore, MD . Penguin Books . 1966, 1972 . Call Number: ND636.R6 1966 . ISBN: . The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or electronic reproductions of copyrighted materials. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or electronic reproduction of copyrighted materials that is to be "used for...private study, scholarship, or research." You may download one copy of such material for your own personal, noncommercial use provided you do not alter or remove any copyright, author attribution, and/or other proprietary notice. Use of this material other than stated above may constitute copyright infringement. http://library.umbc.edu/reserves/staff/bibsheet.php?courseID=5869&reserveID=16583[8/18/2016 12:48:14 PM] f t FRANS HALS: EARLY WORKS 1610-1620 '1;i no. l6II, destroyed in the Second World War; Plate 76n) is now generally accepted 1 as one of Hals' earliest known works. 1 Ifit was really painted by Hals - and it is difficult CHAPTER 4 to name another Dutch artist who used sucli juicy paint and fluent brushwork around li this time - it suggests that at the beginning of his career Hals painted pictures related FRANS HALS i to Van Mander's genre scenes (The Kennis, 1600, Leningrad, Hermitage; Plate 4n) ~ and late religious paintings (Dance round the Golden Calf, 1602, Haarlem, Frans Hals ·1 Early Works: 1610-1620 Museum), as well as pictures of the Prodigal Son by David Vinckboons.
    [Show full text]
  • To Emile Bernard. Arles, Monday, 30 July 1888
    To Emile Bernard. Arles, Monday, 30 July 1888. Monday, 30 July 1888 Metadata Source status: Original manuscript Location: New York, Thaw Collection, The Morgan Library & Museum Date: Assuming that Van Gogh honoured his promise to write again soon, the present letter dates from shortly after the previous one to Bernard (letter 649, of 29 July). The opening words accordingly appear to be an immediate continuation of their discussion about painting, while the drawings that Bernard had sent are examined at the end. Van Goghs new model, Joseph Roulin, who posed for him on 31 July, is not mentioned, despite the fact that the importance of painting portraits is stressed in this letter. On the assumption that he would have told Bernard about Roulins portrait if he had already painted it, as he did Theo and Willemien in letters 652 and 653, both of 31 July, we have dated this letter Monday, 30 July 1888. Additional: Original [1r:1] Mon cher copain Bernard. Tu admettras, jen doute aucunement, que ni toi ni moi ne puissions avoir de Velasquez et de Goya une ide complte de ce quils etaient comme homme et comme peintres, car ni toi ni moi navons vu lEspagne, leur pays et tant de belles choses qui sont restes dans le midi. Nempche que ce que lon en connait cest dj quelque chse. 1 Va sans dire que pour les gens du nord, Rembrandt en tte, il est excessivement dsirable de connatre, en jugeant ces peintres, et leur oeuvre dans toute son tendue, et leur pays et lhistoire un peu intime et serre de lpoque et des moeurs de lantique pays.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Ambition in the Career of Jan Lievens (1607-1674)
    ABSTRACT Title: EVOLUTION AND AMBITION IN THE CAREER OF JAN LIEVENS (1607-1674) Lloyd DeWitt, Ph.D., 2006 Directed By: Prof. Arthur K. Wheelock, Jr. Department of Art History and Archaeology The Dutch artist Jan Lievens (1607-1674) was viewed by his contemporaries as one of the most important artists of his age. Ambitious and self-confident, Lievens assimilated leading trends from Haarlem, Utrecht and Antwerp into a bold and monumental style that he refined during the late 1620s through close artistic interaction with Rembrandt van Rijn in Leiden, climaxing in a competition for a court commission. Lievens’s early Job on the Dung Heap and Raising of Lazarus demonstrate his careful adaptation of style and iconography to both theological and political conditions of his time. This much-discussed phase of Lievens’s life came to an end in 1631when Rembrandt left Leiden. Around 1631-1632 Lievens was transformed by his encounter with Anthony van Dyck, and his ambition to be a court artist led him to follow Van Dyck to London in the spring of 1632. His output of independent works in London was modest and entirely connected to Van Dyck and the English court, thus Lievens almost certainly worked in Van Dyck’s studio. In 1635, Lievens moved to Antwerp and returned to history painting, executing commissions for the Jesuits, and he also broadened his artistic vocabulary by mastering woodcut prints and landscape paintings. After a short and successful stay in Leiden in 1639, Lievens moved to Amsterdam permanently in 1644, and from 1648 until the end of his career was engaged in a string of important and prestigious civic and princely commissions in which he continued to demonstrate his aptitude for adapting to and assimilating the most current style of his day to his own somber monumentality.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Dutch Art Seriously: Now and Next? Author(S): MARIËT WESTERMANN Source: Studies in the History of Art, Vol
    National Gallery of Art Taking Dutch Art Seriously: Now and Next? Author(s): MARIËT WESTERMANN Source: Studies in the History of Art, Vol. 74, Symposium Papers LI: Dialogues in Art History, from Mesopotamian to Modern: Readings for a New Century (2009), pp. 258-270 Published by: National Gallery of Art Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42622727 Accessed: 11-04-2020 11:41 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42622727?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms National Gallery of Art is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studies in the History of Art This content downloaded from 85.72.204.160 on Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:41:16 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms /';-=09 )(8* =-0/'] This content downloaded from 85.72.204.160 on Sat, 11 Apr 2020 11:41:16 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms MARIËT WESTERMANN New York University Taking Dutch Art Seriously : Now and Nextl vative, staid, respectable discipline, some- posium with mounting anxiety.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Course Description
    Online Course Introducing… Reynolds and His Rivals Dates Tuesday 14 and Wednesday 15 September 2021 Times 18.00–20.00 GMT Location Zoom Webinar Tutor Jacqui Ansell Level All Levels Joshua Reynolds, Miss Nelly O'Brien, about 1762-63 (detail) Course Description The great painter, Sir Joshua Reynolds, was famously the first President of the Royal Academy, founded in 1768. The son of a Devon schoolteacher, he rose through the ranks of society to achieve his ultimate aim – to paint for King George III. In his mission to raise the status of painting to the same rank as its ‘sister art of poetry,’ he developed a style of portraiture known as the ‘Grand Style’, imbued with intellectual content. Known as much for his experimental techniques as his innovative iconography, Reynolds’ paintings often suffered from the ravages of time and taste – with young artists of the 19th century christening him ‘Sir Sloshua’! Fashion, in terms of dress as well as approaches to portraiture, will be the key subject of this course, as we explore Reynolds’ attempts to appeal to posterity, as well as to his contemporaries. Session One: ‘Something Modern for the Sake of Likeness’ The 18th century was a ‘Golden Age’ for British portraiture, with Hogarth, Reynolds, Ramsay, as well as Wright of Derby, Gainsborough and Lawrence emerging to lead this field. The rise of Rococo fashions in art and dress created a concern for frills and fripperies, which posed a problem for artists. Not only were these fiddly and time- consuming to consign to canvas, but the rapid pace of fashion change meant that portraits could look old-fashioned before the paint was dry.
    [Show full text]
  • DCMS-Sponsored Museums and Galleries Annual Performance
    Correction notice: The chart showing the Total number of visits to DCMS - sponsored museums and galleries, 2002/03 to 2018/19 and Figure 2 showing the Total number of visits to the DCMS- sponsored museums and galleries, 2008/09 to 2018/19 were updated on 27 January 2020 to reflect the minor amendments made to the Tyne and Wear visitor figures for the years 2008/09 to 2014/15. This release covers the annual DCMS-Sponsored Museums performance indicators for DCMS- sponsored museums and galleries and Galleries Annual in 2018/19. The DCMS-sponsored museums Performance Indicators and galleries are: British Museum 2018/19 Geffrye Museum Horniman Museum Total number of visits to DCMS-sponsored museums and Imperial War Museums galleries, 2008/09 to 2018/19 National Gallery National Museums Liverpool National Portrait Gallery Natural History Museum Royal Armouries Royal Museums Greenwich Science Museum Group Sir John Soane’s Museum Tate Gallery Group Victoria and Albert Museum The Wallace Collection Responsible statistician: Wilmah Deda 020 7211 2376 Statistical enquiries: In 2018/19 there were 49.8 million visits to DCMS- [email protected] sponsored museums and galleries, an increase of @DCMSInsight 48.0% from 33.6 million visits in 2002/03 when records began. Media enquiries: 020 7211 2210 Of these1: Date: 24 October 2019 Contents 1: Introduction……………………..2 2: Visits to DCMS-sponsored museums and galleries………......3 3: Regional engagement...............9 4: Self-generated income……….10 were made by were made by Annex A: Background …...……..12 children under the overseas age of 16 visitors The total self-generated income for DCMS-sponsored museums and galleries was £289 million, an increase of 5.0% from £275 million in 2017/182.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohvz-Haarlem Gratuliert Unseren Osnabrücker Kollegen!
    OHvZ-Haarlem gratuliert unseren Osnabrücker Kollegen! 90. Geburtstag des Vereins f. Philatelie u. Numismatik „Niedersachsen“ September 2018 1 Der Briefmarkenverein ‚Op Hoop van Zegels‘ in Haarlem (die Niederlande), gratuliert der Schwesterngemeinschaft in Osnabrück zum 90-jährigen Jubiläum! Der Verein in Haarlem bereitet derzeit eine Online-Präsentation über die Postgeschichte von Haarlem und seiner Umgebung (Süd Kennemerland) vor. Teil dieser Website ist die Darstellung von Haarlem und Haarlemmers auf Briefmarken. Der bekannteste Haarlemmer ist Frans Hals und Gemälde von Frans Hals sind auf Briefmarken aus verschiedenen Ländern zu finden. Anlässlich des Osnabrücker Jubiläums haben wir mit diesen Frans Hals Briefmarken ein kleines Geschenk gemacht. “Frans Hals (* zwischen 1580 und 1585 in Antwerpen; † 10. August 1666 in Haarlem) war ein niederländischer Maler. Er wird zu den bedeutendsten Porträtmalern gezählt… Frans Hals war vermutlich in Haarlem bis 1603 Lehrling des Malers Carel van Mander. 1610 wurde er in die Lukasgilde, die örtliche Malergilde von Haarlem, aufgenommen…Frans Hals werden nach dem Werkverzeichnis von Seymour Slive (1974) 222 Gemälde zugeordnet, hinzu kommen 20 Gemälde, die als verschollen betrachtet werden. 81 weitere Gemälde wurden ihm zugeschrieben, diese Zuschreibungen werden jedoch kritisch betrachtet oder abgelehnt. Sein frühestes datierbares gesichertes Werk, das Bildnis des Jacobus Zaffius, stammt aus dem Jahre 1611.. Den Höhepunkt seines Frühwerkes bildet das Festmahl der Offiziere der Sankt Georgs-Schützengilde von 1616.. Außerdem schuf er Genrebilder von Trinkern, Zigeunern und Frauen bei ihrer Arbeit, dazu kommen auch viele Kinderbildnisse wie zum Beispiel Der Rommelpotspieler. Ab dem Jahre 1626 wandelte sich Frans Hals’ Stil, zum Teil wohl angeregt durch Einflüsse der Utrechter Caravaggisten..Große Lebendigkeit und treffende Charakterisierung zeichnen seine mit kühnem Pinselstrich ausgeführten, skizzenhaft wirkenden Gemälde aus (beispielsweise Malle Babbe).
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Art, 17Th Century
    Dutch Art, 17th century The Dutch Golden Age was a period in the history of the Netherlands, roughly spanning the 17th century, in which Dutch trade, science, military, and art were among the most acclaimed in the world. The first section is characterized by the Thirty Years' War, which ended in 1648. The Golden Age continued in peacetime during the Dutch Republic until the end of the century. The transition by the Netherlands to the foremost maritime and economic power in the world has been called the "Dutch Miracle" by historian K. W. Swart. Adriaen van Ostade (1610 – 1685) was a Dutch Golden Age painter of genre works. He and his brother were pupils of Frans Hals and like him, spent most of their lives in Haarlem. A01 The Painter in his Workshop 1633 A02 Resting Travelers 1671 David Teniers the Younger (1610 – 1690) was a Flemish painter, printmaker, draughtsman, miniaturist painter, staffage painter, copyist and art curator. He was an extremely versatile artist known for his prolific output. He was an innovator in a wide range of genres such as history, genre, landscape, portrait and still life. He is now best remembered as the leading Flemish genre painter of his day. Teniers is particularly known for developing the peasant genre, the tavern scene, pictures of collections and scenes with alchemists and physicians. A03 Peasant Wedding 1650 A04 Archduke Leopold Wilhelm in his gallery in Brussels Gerrit Dou (1613 – 1675), also known as Gerard and Douw or Dow, was a Dutch Golden Age painter, whose small, highly polished paintings are typical of the Leiden fijnschilders.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Review the Principles of Design
    Let’s Review the Principles of Design BUMPERC Balance – Visual Weight Symmetrical Balance Asymmetrical Balance Radial Balance Balance – Visual Weight Balance – Examples of Alexander Calder’s Work Balance – Visual Weight Radial Balance – Example: A Mandala Sanskrit: म赍डल Maṇḍala, 'circle' Unity – Harmony - They look as though they belong together - The prefix “uni” means the same One of the Greatest Scams to Ever Rock the Art World List of known forgeries by Han van Meegeren:[60][61][62] •A counterpart to Laughing Cavalier after Frans Hals (1923) once the subject of a scandal in The Hague in 1923, its present whereabouts are unknown. •The Happy Smoker after Frans Hals (1923) hangs in the Groninger Museum in the Netherlands •Man and Woman at a Spinet 1932 (sold to Amsterdam banker, Dr. Fritz Mannheimer) •Lady reading a letter[63] 1935–1936 (unsold, on display at the Rijksmuseum.) •Lady playing a lute and looking out the window[64] 1935–1936 (unsold, on display at the Rijksmuseum.) •Portrait of a Man[65] 1935–1936 in the style of Gerard ter Borch (unsold, on display at the Rijksmuseum.) •Woman Drinking (version of Malle Babbe[66] 1935–1936 (unsold, on display at the Rijksmuseum.) •The Supper at Emmaus, 1936–1937 (sold to the Boymans for 520,000 – 550,000 guldens, about $300,000 or $4 Million today) •Interior with Drinkers 1937–1938 (sold to D G. van Beuningen for 219,000 – 220,000 guldens about $120,000 or $1.6 million today) •The Last Supper I, 1938–1939 •Interior with Cardplayers 1938 - 1939 (sold to W. van der Vorm for 219,000 – 220,000 guldens $120,000 or $1.6 million today) •The Head of Christ, 1940–1941 (sold to D G.
    [Show full text]
  • Reserve Number: E16 Name: Spitz, Ellen Handler Course: HONR 300 Date Off: End of Semester Rosenberg, Jakob and Slive, Seymour
    Reserve Number: E16 Name: Spitz, Ellen Handler Course: HONR 300 Date Off: End of semester Rosenberg, Jakob and Slive, Seymour . The School of Delft: Jan Vermeer . Dutch Art and Architecture: 1600-1800 . Rosenberg, Jakob, Slive, S.and ter Kuile, E.H. p. 114-123 . Middlesex, England; Baltimore, MD . Penguin Books . 1966, 1972 . Call Number: . ISBN: . The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or electronic reproductions of copyrighted materials. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or electronic reproduction of copyrighted materials that is to be "used for...private study, scholarship, or research." You may download one copy of such material for your own personal, noncommercial use provided you do not alter or remove any copyright, author attribution, and/or other proprietary notice. Use of this material other than stated above may constitute copyright infringement. http://library.umbc.edu/reserves/staff/bibsheet.php?courseID=5869&reserveID=16585[8/18/2016 12:49:46 PM] ~ PART ONE: PAINTING I60o-1675 THE SCHOOL OF DELFT: JAN VERMEER also painted frequently; even the white horse which became Wouwerman's trademark 84) and Vermeer's Geographer (Frankfurt, Stadelschcs Kunstinstitut; Plate 85) em­ is found in Isaack's pictures. It is difficult to say if one of these two Haarlem artists, phasizes the basic differences between Rembrandt and Vermeer. Rembrandt stands out who were almost exact contemporaries (W ouwerman was only two years older than as an extreme individualist; Vermeer is more representative of the Dutch national Isaack), should be given credit for popularizing this theme or if it was the result of their character.
    [Show full text]
  • As of August 30, 2018 the Leiden Collection Online Catalogue
    As of August 30, 2018 The Leiden Collection Online Catalogue Bibliography ACADÉMIE ROYALE DE BELGIQUE 1866 Académie Royale de Belgique. Exposition de tableaux de maîtres anciens. Exh. cat. Brussels, Académie Royale de Belgique. Brussels, 1886. ADAMS AND HAVERKAMP-BEGEMANN 1988 Adams, Ann Jensen, and Egbert Haverkamp-Begemann. Dutch and Flemish Paintings from New York Private Collections. New York, 1988. AKADEMIE DER KÜNSTE 1925 Akademie der Künste. Gemälde alter Meister aus Berliner Besitz. Ausstellung in der Akademie der Künste. Exh. cat. Berlin, Akademie der Künste. Berlin, 1925. ALEXANDER-KNOTTER, HILLEGERS, AND VAN VOOLEN 2006 Alexander-Knotter, Mirjam, Jasper Hillegers, and Edward van Voolen. The “Jewish” Rembrandt: The Myth Unraveled. Exh. cat. Amsterdam, Joods Historisch Museum. Zwolle, 2006. Originally published as De “joodse” Rembrandt: De mythe ontrafeld. Zwolle, 2006. ALFRED BROD GALLERY 1957 Alfred Brod Gallery. Winter Exhibition. Sales cat. London, Alfred Brod Gallery. London, 1957. ALFRED BROD GALLERY 1963 Alfred Brod Gallery. Annual Autumn Exhibition of Dutch and Flemish Paintings of the 17th Century. Exh. cat. London, Alfred Brod Gallery. London, 1963. ALFRED BROD GALLERY 1965 Alfred Brod Gallery. Fünfzig Gemälde alter Meister: Ausstellung im Künstlerverein Malkasten Düsseldorf. Exh. cat. London, Alfred Brod Gallery. Düsseldorf, 1965. ALPERS 1983 Alpers, Svetlana. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. London, 1983. Page 1 of 130 As of August 30, 2018 VON ALTEN 1871 Von Alten, Friedrich. Verzeichniss der Gemä lde in der Grossherzoglichen Sammlung zu Oldenburg mit einem Anhange der auf den Gemä lden befindlichen Monogramme, Bezeichnungen u. Inschriften. Oldenburg, 1871. VON ALTEN 1890 Von Alten, Friedrich. Verzeichniss der Gemälde, Gypse und Bronzen in der Grossherzoglichen Sammlung zu Oldenburg.
    [Show full text]