<<

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Superior Cantholysis for Zygomatic Fracture Repair

Robert W. Dolan, MD; Daniel K. Smith, MD

Objective: To determine if performing a superior can- tion, and rigid fixation. It also expedites exposure and tholysis eases the surgical exposure, reduction, and rigid assessment of the . No postre- fixation of the in the open re- duction ZMC malunions or malpositions occurred dur- pair of zygomatic complex (ZMC) fractures. ing the study. There were 4 complications, none of which could be attributed to superior cantholysis. The compli- Patients and Methods: Fifteen superior cantholysis pro- cations related primarily to the transconjunctival and lat- cedures were used in 14 patients who presented with ZMC eral canthotomy incisions. fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 18 months. Collected data in- Conclusions: Superior cantholysis eases the surgical cluded patient demographics, cause of fracture, fracture exposure, reduction, and rigid fixation of the zygomati- classification, associated facial injuries, methods of frac- cofrontal suture in the open repair of ZMC fractures. ture exposure and reduction, type and location of fixa- The superior cantholysis added no morbidity in open tion, procedure-related complications, and postoperative ZMC fracture repair, and it simplified exposure of the outcome, including adequacy of fracture reduction. lateral orbital rim, without the need for overzealous tis- sue retraction. Results: Superior cantholysis opens a direct surgical route to the zygomaticofrontal suture for exposure, reduc- Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;2:181-186

RADITIONAL methods of several drawbacks, including a notice- exposing the zygomatico- able scar, and a small strip of intervening frontal (ZF) suture during skin is created between the upper blepha- the repair of zygomatic roplasty and lower canthotomy incisions complex (ZMC) fractures that is prone to scar contracture. In the late Toften lead to unsightly scarring or pro- 1980s, access to the ZF suture was de- longed soft tissue swelling. Approaching scribed via the lateral canthotomy inci- the ZF suture by superior cantholysis sion alone. To expose the suture and lat- avoids these problems, while providing su- eral orbital rim, complete mobilization of perior access to the lateral orbital rim and the lateral canthal ligament (lateral reti- sphenozygomatic suture. naculum), along the lateral or- The ZF suture has traditionally been bital rim, and soft tissues over the lateral accessed through a coronal flap, an in- orbital rim is required. Although this tis- frabrow incision, lateral extension of the sue mobilization avoids an additional skin upper crease incision, or a lateral incision, exposure is more difficult than canthotomy. Although the coronal ap- with a separate skin incision, and “the proach provides wide exposure of the up- strong traction and mobilization re- per ZMC and the ZF suture, it is best re- quired result in more postoperative swell- served for severely comminuted zygomatic ing.”1 Supplementing the lateral canthal in- fractures that are combined with midfa- cision with superior cantholysis directly cial or cranial fractures. The infrabrow in- exposes the ZF suture, similar to the ex- cision is a transcutaneous approach for di- posure provided in the upper blepharo- From the Department of rect exposure of the ZF suture. It is the plasty incision, but without the added mor- Otorhinolaryngology, University most convenient and simplest method with bidity of an additional skin incision. of Oklahoma Health Science which to expose the suture, but it can lead Superior cantholysis frees the lat- Center, Oklahoma City (Dr Dolan); and the Department to obvious scarring and contour irregu- eral aspect of the upper eyelid margin to of Otolaryngology–Head and larities in the lateral and infrabrow areas. swing superiorly, directly exposing the Neck Surgery, Boston University The lateral extension of the upper eyelid ZF suture. There is no need for extensive School of Medicine, Boston, crease (blepharoplasty) incision pro- tissue retraction or mobilization of the Mass (Dr Smith). vides direct access to the ZF suture but has tissues over the lateral orbital rim. Ac-

(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 2, JULY-SEP 2000 WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM 181

©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/24/2021 PATIENTS, MATERIALS, superior lateral eyelid margins is critical. The configura- tion of the palpebral slit gives the illusion that the canthi AND METHODS are on different levels with respect to the true axial plane. However, the canthi and the insertions of the canthal liga- PATIENTS AND MATERIALS ments should be on the same plane, falling directly on a true horizontal line extending across the (Figure 1). Fifteen superior cantholysis procedures were used in 14 pa- The lateral aspect of the lower eyelid should gently slope tients who presented with ZMC fractures requiring open upward toward its lateral insertion, and the eyelid margin reduction and internal fixation. Follow-up ranged from 6 should appear to fold under the lateral aspect of the upper to 18 months. Collected data included patient demograph- eyelid margin (Figure 2). The lateral palpebral ligament ics, cause of fracture, fracture classification, associated fa- includes superficial and deep limbs that course from the cial injuries, methods of fracture exposure and reduction, and lateral tarsal borders to the lateral or- type and location of fixation, procedure-related complica- bital rim. The superficial component is thin and ill de- tions, and postoperative outcome, including adequacy of fined, inserting into the fascia over the superficial aspect fracture reduction. The fractures were classified as fol- of the lateral orbital rim. The deep limbs are distinct fas- lows according to a simplified schema described by Zingg cial bands that originate at the lateral borders of the supe- et al2: type A1, isolated fracture; type A2, rior and inferior tarsal plates and insert onto the medial as- isolated lateral orbital wall fracture; type A3, isolated in- pect of the lateral orbital rim at Whitnall tubercle. Whitnall fraorbital rim fracture; type B, tetrapod fracture; and type tubercle is located approximately 4 mm deep to the lateral C, multifragmented ZMC fracture. orbital rim and 9 mm inferior to the ZF suture.3

SURGICAL TECHNIQUES Transconjunctival Approach With Lateral Canthotomy

Anatomy A corneal shield (crescent-shaped plastic or metal conform- ing cup) was placed and later supplanted by pulling the in- Zygomatic complex fractures involve at least 4 skeletal dis- feriorly based conjunctivocapsulopalpebral flap over the cor- ruptions, including the sphenozygomatic suture, inferior neal surface using traction sutures. Loop magnification was orbital rim and floor, ZF suture, and zygomaticomaxillary helpful to accurately identify the layers of the lower eyelid. suture. To perform the superior canthal approaches in a By dissecting anterior to the orbital septum (preseptal ap- safe manner and to mobilize the lateral retinaculum, a thor- proach) after traversing the capsulopalpebral fascia, pro- ough understanding of the relevant anatomy is essential for lapse of orbital fat into the wound was avoided. Avoidance maximizing surgical exposure, while minimizing the risk of orbital fat was helpful to maximize the surgical exposure of injury to adjacent structures. An appreciation of the sur- and to prevent inadvertent injury to the inferior oblique anatomy regarding the relationship of the inferior and muscle, which may be obscured by prolapsing fat.

1/3 1/3 1/3

Figure 1. The lateral palpebral commissures should fall within 2 mm of a horizontal line that passes through the medial palpebral commissures.

Figure 2. Note that the lower eyelid margin appears to fold under the lateral extent of the upper eyelid margin. Meticulous reposition of the lower lateral cess to the lateral and sphenozygomatic suture is canthal tendon should re-create this configuration. facilitated. Herein, we describe the technique, applica- tion, and results of superior cantholysis in a consecu- tive series of 14 patients with ZMC fractures requiring the orbital floor, complications, cause of fracture, par- open reduction. ity, and associated facial injuries are shown in the Table. All the fractures were rigidly fixed with 1.7 miniplates RESULTS over the ZF suture using at least 2 screws on each side of the fracture line. The inferior orbital rim was fixed by The study included 12 male and 2 female patients (me- either wire osteosynthesis (patient 9) or a 1.3 miniplate dian age, 35 years). Treatment date, patient age and sex, using at least 2 screws on either side of the fracture line. fracture classification, surgical approaches, treatment of Gel film was placed over the orbital floor in all but 3 pa-

(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 2, JULY-SEP 2000 WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM 182

©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/24/2021 In preparation for the preseptal approach to the or- the midportion of the exposed tendon, 4-0 nonabsorbable bital floor, the surgeon stood at the head of the operating sutures were passed and held away with hemostats, and the table and everted the patient’s lower eyelid to view the in- tendon was cut between the sutures (Figure 5). The up- ner aspect of the inferior tarsus. A horizontal incision was per eyelid was lifted away from the lateral orbital rim, ex- made inferior to the tarsus (approximately 5 mm below the posing the periosteum over the ZF suture. A few millime- eyelid margin or 1 mm inferior to the tarsus), extending ters above the insertion of the lateral canthal tendon, the just lateral to the orifice of the inferior canaliculus. Bleed- periosteum of the lateral orbital rim was sharply incised ver- ing was minimized by the use of a sharp-tipped electro- tically and peeled away from the underlying ZF suture. Ad- cautery device for the incision and subsequent dissection. equate periosteal stripping was done to accommodate a The incision was deepened through the capsulopalpebral miniplate with 2 proximal and 2 distal screw holes. To aid fascia, above the divergence of the fascial layers that en- in fracture reduction and fixation, both the inferior orbital close the orbital fat (capsulopalpebral fascia and orbital rim fracture and the ZF suture could be visualized simulta- septum). The orbicularis oculi muscle was visualized an- neously (Figure 6). teriorly, and the dissection plane between the muscle and orbital septum was developed by a combination of blunt Reduction, Fixation, and Closure and sharp dissection. The orbital rim was encountered, and the dissection continued over the rim approximately 1 mm Reduction and rigid fixation were accomplished by meth- before sharply dividing the periosteum anterior to the infe- ods well described in the literature.2 Plates or wires were rior arcus marginalis. A subperiosteal plane was entered used to fixate the lateral and inferior orbital rim fractures and widened posteriorly over the bony orbital floor and (Figure 7). anteriorly over the inferior orbital rim. This exposure The superior canthal tendon was approximated by ty- allowed evaluation and repair of fractures involving the ing the distal and proximal marking sutures together, pre- orbital floor and inferior orbital rim. To improve the expo- cisely repositioning the lateral upper eyelid. The inferior sure of the orbital floor and rim, a lateral canthotomy and canthal tendon was carefully sutured (nonabsorbable su- an inferior cantholysis were performed. The skin incision ture) above and slightly behind its original attachment at extended no more than 1 cm beyond the lateral palpebral Whitnall tubercle. The orientation of the lower eyelid with slit, slightly offset from the underlying canthotomy respect to the upper eyelid in this area was visually con- (Figure 3). firmed so that the lower eyelid curved gently superiorly to fall just behind the lateral extent of the upper eyelid. The Superior Cantholysis lateral canthotomy was closed in layers. The conjunctival incision required no suturing, and the lower eyelid was The deep limb of the superior canthal tendon was located pulled superiorly using a Frost suture or tape to avoid any by grasping the lateral eyelid margin and strumming the ten- overlapping of the wound edges that could lead to vertical don with a fine forceps (Figure 4). Distal and proximal to shortening of the lower eyelid and ectropion.

Figure 3. Lateral canthotomy (small arrow) and capsulopalpebral flap protecting corneal surface (large arrow).

tients. Patient 14 had a ZMC fracture that was associ- Figure 4. Superior traction on the lateral aspect of the upper eyelid helps ated with a significant orbital floor defect, which was re- define the superior canthal tendon. constructed with biodegradable sheeting (LactoSorb; Walter Lorenz Surgical, Jacksonville, Fla). Postopera- No postreduction ZMC malunions or malposi- tive edema and ecchymosis were typically completely re- tions occurred. There were 4 complications, none of solved within 2 weeks of fracture repair. The lateral can- which could be attributed to superior cantholysis. One thotomy incision healed well in all patients and was complication involved postoperative bacterial con- inconspicuous (Figure 8). junctivitis that resolved promptly with antibacterial

(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 2, JULY-SEP 2000 WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM 183

©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/24/2021 Figure 5. Superior canthal tendon is cut between the stay sutures.

Figure 7. Plating the zygomaticofrontal suture.

COMMENT Superior cantholysis opens a direct surgical route to the Figure 6. Simultaneous exposure of the zygomaticofrontal suture and ZF suture for exposure, reduction, and rigid fixation. It inferior orbital rim fractures. The capsulopalpebral flap is protecting the also expedites exposure and assessment of the spheno- corneal surface. zygomatic suture. By avoiding excessive tissue traction and additional skin incisions, tissue damage and scar- ring are minimized, while the ease of dissection is greatly ophthalmic drops (patient 13). The second complica- facilitated. Our patients experienced no adverse se- tion involved cicatrical inferior displacement of the quelae as a result of the procedure. The complications lower eyelid along the entire extent of the transcon- related primarily to the transconjunctival and lateral can- junctival incision (patient 5) due to overlapping of the thotomy incisions. According to our findings, superior capsulopalpebral flap with the transconjunctival inci- cantholysis is a safe and effective procedure. Most of the sion. Treatment consisted of re-creation of the trans- complications are avoidable by technical improvements conjunctival incision and temporary inferior eyelid in approximating the lower lateral canthal tendon and suspension with a Frost suture. The third complica- the conjunctival incisions. tion involved a technical error in suturing the lateral Modern methods of surgical exposure for the re- too anteriorly, causing a slight separation of pair of facial fractures are based on craniofacial tech- the lateral eyelid margin from the globe and accumula- niques that were developed during the last half of the tion of granulation tissue (patient 14). Patient 14 20th century in a variety of disciplines, including oto- required revision surgery to restore the normal orien- laryngology–head and neck surgery, plastic surgery, tation of the lower eyelid with respect to the globe maxillofacial surgery, and neurosurgery. Before these and lateral upper eyelid area. The fourth complication developments, exposure of facial fractures consisted of involved a patient complaint of faint discomfort making several small incisions over fracture sites, with over the inferior orbital rim that corresponded to the little concern given to visible scars or sensorimotor location of a 1.3-mm titanium plate (patient 11). The deficits. Although limited surgical access is often all plate was removed through the transconjunctival that is required for selected simple facial fractures, com- route, and the symptoms completely resolved. A float- plex or comminuted fractures demand more extensive ing fragment of at the medial aspect of the in- exposure for accurate reduction and fixation. The mod- ferior orbital rim was detected on a radiograph ern approach to complex facial fractures (which repre- in patient 9 in the recovery room. He was immediately sent most facial fractures) is wide surgical exposure that returned to the operating room, and the fragment was facilitates a 3-dimensional assessment of fracture dis- wired in place through a Lynch incision; he recovered placement and application of rigid internal fixation ap- uneventfully. pliances and bone grafts.4 These surgical approaches

(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 2, JULY-SEP 2000 WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM 184

©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/24/2021 Patient Demographics, Fracture Characteristics, and Treatment*

Patient No./ Inferior Orbital Treatment of Associated Age, y/Sex Class† Approaches‡ Orbital Floor Complication Cause Side Facial Injuries 1/33/M B TC, LC, GB, and SC Gel film None MVC R None B TC, LC, GB, and SC Gel film None . . . L None 2/53/M B TC, LC, GB, and SC Gel film None MVC R None 3/31/F B TC, LC, GB, and SC Gel film None MVC R Lefort II 4/35/M B TC, LC, and SC Gel film None A L None 5/41/F B TC, LC, and SC Gel film Lower eyelid MVC L None malposition 6/42/M B SubC, LC, and SC Gel film None A R None 7/42/M B TC, LC, and SC Gel film None A L Retinal tear; nasal fracture 8/57/M C TC, LC, and SC None None A L Globe rupture 9/43/M B TC, LC, and SC Gel film Reoperation for MVC L None missing fragment 10/22/M B TC, LC, and SC Gel film None A L None 11/21/M C TC, LC, and SC None Delayed plate removal MVC R None 12/22/M B TC, LC, and SC Gel film None A L Mandible fracture 13/46/M B TC, LC, and SC Gel film A L None 14/15/M B TC, LC, and SC Biodegradable Lower eyelid A R Orbital blowout sheeting malposition

*TC indicates transconjunctival; LC, lateral cantholysis; GB, gingivobuccal; SC, superior cantholysis; SubC, subciliary; MVC, motor vehicle crash; ellipses, not applicable; A, assault; R, right; and L, left. †See the “Patients and Materials” subsection of the “Patients, Materials, and Methods” section for the definition of the classes. ‡Other approaches and procedures included a Gillies operation (patient 1), a suborbicularis oculi fat suspension (patient 6), and a Lynch incision (patient 9).

emphasize minimally invasive techniques that spare neurosensory structures, while maximizing exposure of the facial skeleton. Craniofacial incisions are hidden in such areas as behind the hairline, within the oral cavity, in the , or under the eyelid. The transcon- junctival approach to the orbital rim and floor has proved to be superior to previous methods of orbital rim and floor exposure (eg, the subciliary approach) in the avoidance of postoperative lower eyelid malposi- tion.5 Nevertheless, complications may be encountered, as demonstrated in our series of patients. Patients 5 and 14 developed lower eyelid malpositions as a result of Figure 8. Patient 13 six months after fracture repair. Note excellent technical errors, including poor anatomical reposition- symmetry and configuration of the lateral palpebral commissures and barely ing of the lower lateral canthal tendon and overlap of discernible lateral canthotomy incision. the free edges of the capsulopalpebral flap, which led to cicatrical ectropion. To avoid these complications, the the traditional surgical approaches unless a skin inci- deep limb of the lower lateral canthal tendon should be sion is made over the suture itself or in the inferolateral sutured slightly behind and above its original attach- brow. However, scarring in these areas tends to be ob- ment at Whitnall tubercle. The lateral palpebral com- vious. Exposure and plating of the ZF suture via a lat- missure should be on the same horizontal plane as the eral canthotomy have been described, but the dissec- medial commissure and well apposed to the globe sur- tion is difficult and involves extensive disruption of the face. At the conclusion of the operation, the lower eye- superficial lateral retinaculum and rigorous skin retrac- lid should be pulled superiorly to eliminate overlap of tion.1 Superior cantholysis releases the upper eyelid and the capsulopalpebral flap and the transconjunctival in- frees the medial aspect of the lateral canthotomy inci- cision. It is helpful to use a Frost suture or inferior eye- sion, minimizing the amount of skin retraction and lat- lid taping for 48 hours to prevent poor appositional eral orbital soft tissue dissection required for exposure healing and cicatrical ectropion. of the ZF suture. It facilitates exposure of the sphenozy- Surgical access to the ZF suture is important in the gomatic suture, confirmation of adequate reduction, and treatment of unstable ZMC fractures, since it serves as application of hardware. In our initial experience with an excellent site for rigid fixation. Also, just posterolat- superior cantholysis, a gingivobuccal incision for evalu- eral to the ZF suture is the sphenozygomatic suture. Three- ation of the zygomaticomaxillary suture was used to as- dimensional alignment of the sphenozygomatic suture sess the adequacy of reduction. However, this incision serves as a useful indicator of successful reduction, es- was abandoned in favor of the sphenozygomatic suture pecially in cases of severely displaced or comminuted ZMC because of the significantly improved visualization of the fractures.2 Exposure of the ZF suture can be difficult with lateral orbit with superior cantholysis.

(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 2, JULY-SEP 2000 WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM 185

©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/24/2021 Although we routinely performed an inferior can- suture is also exposed, providing a 3-dimensional con- tholysis, this step could be eliminated in favor of a su- firmation of fracture reduction. perior cantholysis alone through a lateral canthotomy incision. A superior cantholysis alone should allow ad- Accepted for publication May 15, 2000. equate inferior orbital rim and ZF suture exposure Corresponding author: Robert W. Dolan, MD, Depart- without the added potential morbidity of an inferior ment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health cantholysis. We have also inserted an endoscope into Science Center, PO Box 26901, WP 1360, Oklahoma City, the lateral orbit to visualize the sphenozygomatic su- OK 73190-3048 (e-mail: [email protected]). ture line, which provided a magnified image and further minimized soft tissue dissection. Our experience with this technique is preliminary and was not used in the REFERENCES present series of patients. 1. Manson PN, Ruas E, Iliff N, Yaremchuk M. Single eyelid incision for exposure of the and orbital reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;79: CONCLUSIONS 120-126. 2. Zingg M, Laedrach K, Chen J, et al. Classification and treatment of zygomatic Superior cantholysis eases the surgical exposure, reduc- fractures: a review of 1,025 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:778-790. tion, and rigid fixation of the ZF suture in the open re- 3. Anastassov GE, van Damme PA. Evaluation of the anatomical position of the lat- pair of ZMC fractures. The superior cantholysis adds no eral canthal ligament: clinical implications and guidelines. J Craniofac Surg. 1996; morbidity in open ZMC fracture repair and simplifies ex- 7:429-436. 4. Jones WD III, Whitaker LA, Murtagh F. Applications of reconstructive craniofa- posure of the lateral orbital rim, without the need for over- cial techniques to acute craniofacial trauma. J Trauma. 1977;17:339-343. zealous tissue retraction. With some additional dissec- 5. Converse JM, Firmin F, Wood-Smith D, Friedland JA. The conjunctival approach tion along the lateral orbital wall, the sphenozygomatic in orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;52:656-657.

(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 2, JULY-SEP 2000 WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM 186

©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/24/2021