DOCSLIB.ORG

Polarized Target for the Measurement of the Gluon Contribution to the Nucleon Spin in the COMPASS Experiment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Polarized Target for the Measurement of the Gluon Contribution to the Nucleon Spin in the COMPASS Experiment Polarized target for the measurement of the gluon contribution to the nucleon spin in the COMPASS experiment Nagoya University Thesis for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Physics by Naoki TAKABAYASHI 1 2002 1 Supported by Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists. CONTENTS 1. Introduction : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1 2. Spin structure of the nucleon : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 5 2.1 Deep inelastic scattering . 5 2.2 Cross section and structure functions in unpolarized DIS . 7 2.3 Cross section and structure functions in polarized DIS . 9 2.4 Structure functions and spin puzzle in Parton Model picture . 13 2.4.1 Parton distribution . 14 2.4.2 Spin puzzle in Parton Model picture . 16 2.5 Structure functions and spin puzzle in QCD evolved Parton Model . 18 2.5.1 Unpolarized structure functions . 18 2.5.2 Factorization schemes . 20 2.5.3 DGLAP equation and Scaling violation . 22 2.5.4 Spin-dependent structure functions and polarized DGLAP equation . 23 2.6 Interpretation of small ∆Σ. Is gluon contribution large? . 24 2.6.1 Sum rules . 25 2.6.2 Axial anomaly . 26 3. COMPASS experiment : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 30 3.1 Open charm lepto-production via photon-gluon fusion . 30 3.2 Expectations . 35 3.2.1 Luminosity . 35 3.2.2 Reconstruction of the open charm events . 35 3.2.3 Statistical accuracy . 37 3.3 Comparison with the other experiments on ∆g . 40 3.3.1 High pT hadron pairs . 40 3.3.2 pp¯ collision . 41 3.3.3 Comparison of the expected precisions and the kine- matic ranges . 42 Contents ii 3.4 Experimental setup . 43 3.4.1 Polarized muon beam . 44 3.4.2 Polarized target . 47 3.4.3 COMPASS spectrometer . 49 4. Polarized Target : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 54 4.1 Dynamic nuclear polarization . 55 4.1.1 Definition of polarization . 55 4.1.2 Thermal equilibrium polarization . 56 4.1.3 Zeeman splitting . 57 4.1.4 Dipolar-dipolar interaction . 58 4.1.5 Macroscopic effects . 63 4.1.6 Hyperfine interaction . 64 4.1.7 Equal spin temperature . 70 4.2 The polarization measurement . 72 4.2.1 Nuclear magnetic resonance . 72 4.2.2 Detection of the absorption function . 73 4.2.3 Area method . 77 4.3 Polarized target apparatus . 79 4.3.1 Dilution refrigerator . 79 4.3.2 Superconducting magnet . 85 4.3.3 Microwave system . 88 4.3.4 Nuclear magnetic resonance system . 90 4.4 Target material 6LiD . 92 4.4.1 Choice of the material . 92 4.4.2 Preparation of 6LiD . 97 4.5 Results from polarized target . 99 4.5.1 TE calibration . 99 4.5.2 Deuteron polarization . 104 4.5.3 Paramagnetic resonance at high polarization . 108 4.5.4 Verification of equal spin temperature theory . 109 5. Superconducting magnet for the polarized target : : : : : : : : : : 112 5.1 Electromagnetics . 113 5.2 Cryogenics . 119 5.2.1 Normal continuous operation . 121 5.2.2 Cooling down phase . 122 5.3 Active protection system . 124 5.4 Anomalous cases . 127 Contents iii 6. Conclusions and Outlook : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 131 Appendix 134 A. Parameters in Chapter 3 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 135 B. Parameters in Chapter 4 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 137 C. Parameters in Chapter 5 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 139 LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 Feynman diagram of DIS . 6 2.2 DIS in the infinite momentum frame . 15 2.3 Amplitudes of DIS off a quark . 18 2.4 Squares of the Feynman diagram involving real gluon emission 19 2.5 Squares of the Feynman diagrams with a initial gluon . 19 2.6 Illustration of the QCD processes of the four splitting functions 21 2.7 Diagrams relevant to axial anomaly . 27 3.1 Example of the possible shapes of ∆g . 31 3.2 Feynman diagram of open charm leptoproduction via photo- gluon fusion . 32 3.3 Expected statistical accuracy . 38 3.4 Feynman diagram of the high pT jet pair . 40 3.5 Feynman diagram of the γ production in pp or pp¯ collisions . 42 3.6 Projected accuracies on Deltag=g . 43 3.7 M2 polarized muon beam line . 45 3.8 Spin configurations of in the COMPASS experiment . 48 3.9 COMPASS spectrometer in 2001 . 51 4.1 DNP mechanism via dipolar-dipolar interaction . 62 4.2 DNP mechanism via hyperfine interaction . 70 4.3 Series LRC resonance circuit . 74 4.4 Side view of the COMPASS polarized target apparatus . 80 4.5 Materials inside the particle detection acceptance . 81 4.6 Diagram of the dilution refrigerator . 82 4.7 Phase diagram of 3He-4He mixture . 84 4.8 Operation of the magnet system during the field rotation . 86 4.9 Magnetic field during the field rotation . 87 4.10 Microwave system . 88 4.11 Schematic outline of the NMR system . 91 4.12 Face centered cubic structure . 92 4.13 Simple illustration of the F-center . 98 List of Figures v 4.14 Paramagnetic resonance spectrum of the irradiated 6LiD . 99 4.15 NMR signal extraction . 100 4.16 Relaxation of the nuclear spin to the thermal equilibrium . 101 4.17 Build-up of the deuteron polarization . 105 4.18 Enhanced deuteron signals . 106 4.19 Paramagnetic resonance spectrum of 6LiD at high polarization108 4.20 Test of EST . 110 5.1 Illustration of the coils in Magnet . 113 5.2 Electric scheme of Solenoid and Corrections . 115 5.3 Electric scheme of Dipole . 116 5.4 Cryogenic scheme of Magnet . 120 LIST OF TABLES 3.1 Numerical presentation of the cross sections of open charm lepto-production . 36 3.2 Parameters of the polarized muon beam . 46 4.1 Thickness of the material in the polarized target apparatus . 89 4.2 Figure of merit of the target materials . 95 4.3 Measurements for TE calibration . 102 4.4 Errors in TE calibration . 103 4.5 Maximum deuteron polarization . 107 5.1 Electromagnetic characteristics of Solenoid . 114 5.2 Electromagnetic characteristics of Corrections . 117 5.3 Electromagnetic characteristics of Dipole . 118 5.4 DL (Slow discharge) . 125 5.5 DR (Rapid discharge) 1 . 126 5.6 DR (Rapid discharge) 2 . 127 5.7 Anomalous cases, AN1-AN3 . 128 5.8 Anomalous cases, AN4-AN6 . 129 5.9 Anomalous cases, AN7 . 130 A.1 Variables in Chapter 3 . 136 B.1 Constants in Chapter 4 . 138 B.2 Units for Chapter 4 . 138 B.3 Abbreviations for Chapter 4 . 138 C.1 Terms in Chapter 5 . 140 C.2 Abbreviations in Chapter 5 . 141 1. INTRODUCTION Scattering a beam of elementary particles such as leptons off a target of nucleons provides an experimental technique for investigating the structure of the nucleons. In low energy scattering, where the beam energy is less than the target mass, the nucleon looks like a point-like particle. However, as the energy of the incident lepton increases, the structure of nucleon be- gins to unveil. When the lepton energy increases above the nucleon mass, the charge distributions of the nucleons are probed. The deviation of the measured cross section from the known cross section for a point-like particle describes the charge distribution of the composite objects. The form factors, or charge distributions, of the nucleons were measured by this technique in the experiments during the 1970s at SLAC. If the lepton energy increases even higher, then the deep inelastic scat- tering (DIS) regime is reached. In DIS, the lepton has high enough energy to break apart the nucleons and therefore to probe the internal structure of the nucleons, namely the structure functions. Polarized DIS experiment, in which polarized leptons are scattered off a target of polarized nucleons, provides the information on the internal structure of the nucleon spin. The spin-dependent structure function of the nucleon was experimentally mea- sured first by the Yale-SLAC Collaboration E80 [1], and then by the E130 Collaboration [2] in 1970s and early 1980s, using 8 and 20 GeV electron beam. At CERN, the European Muon Collaboration (EMC) [3, 4] investi- gated the proton spin structure during the 1980s using 90 GeV muon beam. The EMC results reported in 1988 attracted the attentions of the re- searchers, which state that the quarks carry unexpectedly small fraction (0:128 0:013 (stat) 0:019 (sys)) of the nucleon spin. The EMC inter- preted its data in the framework of the naive Parton Model and found that the experimentally measured value of the Ellis-Jaffe Sum Rule [5] for the proton is too small compared to the theoretical prediction. Following the EMC results, extensive theoretical and experimental works were performed to understand the spin structure of the nucleon in 1990s. One of the the- oretical advances was to describe the spin dependent structure function in the framework of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), showing the Q2 evo- 1. Introduction 2 lution of the structure functions due to the interaction between quarks and gluons. Experimentally, precise measurements had been carried out by the Spin Muon Collaboration (SMC) at CERN using 100 and 190 GeV muon beam with proton and deuteron target, by a series of experiments at SLAC, E142, E143, E154 and E155 using 26-50 GeV electron beam with proton, deuteron, and 3He target, and by the HERMES collaboration at DESY using 28 GeV electron beam with proton and 3He target. These experi- mental data together with the QCD evolution analysis still show that the quarks carry unexpectedly small fraction, 20-30 %, of the nucleon spin at Q2 = 10 GeV2 and that the Ellis-Jaffe Sum Rule is violated. On the other hand, the Bjorken Sum Rule [6, 7], which is the difference of the first mo- ment of the spin-dependent structure function g1 between a proton and a neutron and which is a model independent result of QCD, was confirmed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Polarized Target Experiments for Elementary Particle Physics
    SOME POLARIZED TARGET EXPERIMENTS FOR ELEMENTARY PARTICLE PHYSICS R.H. DALITZ Department of Theoretical Physics, Oxford INTRODUCTION At the present stage in elementary particle physics, there are three major areas of phenomena where the use of polarized targets may lead to especially illuminating information. a. High energy scattering, in the energy range where the dominant contributions to the processes observed may arise from Reggion ex­ change. The features of particular interest in these situjtions will be discussed at this meeting by Dr R.J.N. Phillips 1 • b. Tests of time-reversal (T) invariance for electrom~gnetic pro­ cesses, following the suggestion by Bernstein et al 2) that the CF-violation observed in the weak decay of kaons arises from the existence of an electromagnetic interaction which strongly viola­ tes T-invariance. Evidence for this hypothetical T-violating elec­ tromagnetic interaction can be sought most directly in the study of electromagnetic processes from a polarized proton target, for example in the study of the electro-excitation process e + N-+ e + N* , as discussed by Christ and Lee 3J. The experi~ents proposed will be discussed at this meeting by Dr M. Jacob 4J. c. Hadron spectroscopy. Very many resonant states have been obser­ ved for masonic and baryonic states. These hadronic states are be­ lieved to correspond to the patterns appropriate to unitary multi­ plets of states, and these unitary multiplets appear to be grouped in supermultiplet patterns. In our attempt to classify and under­ stand all these hadronic states, our first need is for the deter­ mination of the spin and parity for each state.
    [Show full text]
  • A Peek Into Spin Physics
    A Peek into Spin Physics Dustin Keller University of Virginia Colloquium at Kent State Physics Outline ● What is Spin Physics ● How Do we Use It ● An Example Physics ● Instrumentation What is Spin Physics The Physics of exploiting spin - Spin in nuclear reactions - Nucleon helicity structure - 3D Structure of nucleons - Fundamental symmetries - Spin probes in beyond SM - Polarized Beams and Targets,... What is Spin Physics What is Spin Physics ● The Physics of exploiting spin : By using Polarized Observables Spin: The intrinsic form of angular momentum carried by elementary particles, composite particles, and atomic nuclei. The Spin quantum number is one of two types of angular momentum in quantum mechanics, the other being orbital angular momentum. What is Spin Physics What Quantum Numbers? What is Spin Physics What Quantum Numbers? Internal or intrinsic quantum properties of particles, which can be used to uniquely characterize What is Spin Physics What Quantum Numbers? Internal or intrinsic quantum properties of particles, which can be used to uniquely characterize These numbers describe values of conserved quantities in the dynamics of a quantum system What is Spin Physics But a particle is not a sphere and spin is solely a quantum-mechanical phenomena What is Spin Physics Stern-Gerlach: If spin had continuous values like the classical picture we would see it What is Spin Physics Stern-Gerlach: Instead we see spin has only two values in the field with opposite directions: or spin-up and spin-down What is Spin Physics W. Pauli (1925)
    [Show full text]
  • Hadron Spin Dynamics∗
    SLAC-PUB-9107 January 2002 Hadron Spin Dynamics¤ Stanley J. Brodsky Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University Stanford, California 94309 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Spin effects in exclusive and inclusive reactions provide an essential new dimension for testing QCD and unraveling hadron structure. Remarkable new experiments from SLAC, HERMES (DESY), and Jefferson Lab present many challenges to theory, including measurements at HERMES and SMC of the sin- gle spin asymmetries in ep ! e0¼X where the proton is polarized normal to the scattering plane. This type of single spin asymmetry may be due to the effects of rescattering of the outgoing quark on the spectators of the target proton, an effect usually neglected in conventional QCD analyses. Many aspects of spin, such as single-spin asymmetries and baryon magnetic moments are sensitive to the dynamics of hadrons at the amplitude level, rather than probability dis- tributions. I will illustrate the novel features of spin dynamics for relativistic systems by examining the explicit form of the light-front wavefunctions for the two-particle Fock state of the electron in QED, thus connecting the Schwinger anomalous magnetic moment to the spin and orbital momentum carried by its Fock state constituents and providing a transparent basis for understand- ing the structure of relativistic composite systems and their matrix elements in hadronic physics. I also present a survey of outstanding spin puzzles in QCD, particularly ANN in elastic pp scattering, the J=Ã ! ½¼ puzzle, and J=Ã polarization at the Tevatron. Concluding Theory Talk, presented at the 3rd Circum-Pan-Pacific Symposium On High Energy Spin Physics (SPIN 2001) Beijing, China 8–13 October 2001 ¤Work supported by the Department of Energy, contract DE–AC03–76SF00515.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Polarized Targets for Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments
    P1: NBL October 6, 1997 15:46 Annual Reviews AR043-03 Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 1997. 47:67–109 Copyright c 1997 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved ! SOLID POLARIZED TARGETS FOR NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS EXPERIMENTS D. G. Crabb Physics Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 W. Meyer Institut fur¨ Experimentalphysik I, Ruhr-Universitat¨ Bochum, Bochum, Germany KEY WORDS: dynamic polarization, nucleon spin structure, lepton scattering, cryogenics, asymmetry ABSTRACT The development, in the early 1960s, of the dynamic nuclear polarization process in solid diamagnetic materials, doped with paramagnetic radicals, led to the use of solid polarized targets in numerous nuclear and particle physics experiments. Since then steady progress has been made in all contributing subsystems so that proton polarizations near 100% and deuteron polarizations higher than 50% have been achieved in various materials. More radiation-resistant materials, such as ammonia, have made it possible to perform experiments with high beam intensi- ties and experiments that benefit from 4He cooling at 1K and high magnetic fields. The development of dilution refrigerators have allowed frozen spin operation so that experiments with large angular acceptance for the scattered particles have by University of Virginia Libraries on 05/18/07. For personal use only. become routine. Many experiments have taken advantage of these developments and many more are being planned, especially with electromagnetic probes. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 1997.47:67-109. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION . 68 2. POLARIZATION MECHANISMS . 71 2.1 Thermal Equilibrium Polarization . 72 2.2 Solid-State Effect . 72 2.3 Equal Spin Temperature Theory .
    [Show full text]
  • DEUTERON POLARIZED TARGET for Nd EXPERIMENTS at THE
    DEUTERON FROZEN SPIN POLARIZED TARGET FOR nd EXPERIMENTS AT THE VdG ACCELERATOR OF CHARLES UNIVERSITY N.S. Borisov1, N.A. Bazhanov1, A.A. Belyaev4, J. Brož2, J. Černý2, Z. Doležal2, A.N. Fedorov1, G.M. Gurevich3, M.P. Ivanov1, P. Kodyš2, P. Kubík2, E.S. Kuzmin1, A.B. Lazarev1, F. Lehar5,6 , O.O. Lukhanin4, V.N. Matafonov†1, A.B. Neganov1, I.L. Pisarev1, J. Švejda2, S.N. Shilov1, Yu.A. Usov1 and I.Wilhelm2 1Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia; 2Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague; V Holešovičkách 2, CZ18000 Prague 8, Czech Republic; 3Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; 4NSC KIPT, Kharkov, 5SPP DAPNIA CEA Saclay, F-91190 Gif sur Yvette, France 6IEAP CTU, Horska 3a/22 CZ 12800 Prague 2, Czech Republic Abstract. A frozen spin polarized deuteron target cooled by the 3He/4He dilution refrigerator is described. Fully deuterated 1,2-propanediol was used as a target material. Deuteron vector polarization about 40% was obtained for the target in the shape of a cylinder of 2 cm diameter and 6 cm length. The target is intended for a study of 3N interactions at the polarized neutron beam generated by the Van de Graaff accelerator at the Charles University in Prague. 1. Introduction The Charles University proton polarized target (PPT) [1] has been used previously to measure spin–dependent total cross section differences ∆σT and ∆σL in neutron-proton scattering at the 16.2 MeV polarized neutron beam of the VdG accelerator (Fig.1) [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • Helicity Density Matrix Formalism and Polarized Processes in QCD Jian Tang
    Helicity Density Matrix Formalism and Polarized Processes in QCD by Jian Tang B.S., Peking University, P.R. China (1991) M.S., Peking University, P.R. China (1994) M.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1996) Submitted to the Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 1999 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1999. All rights reserved. A uthor ........... ................... Department of Physics May 26, 1999 C ertified bA ............................... Robert L. Jaffe Professor Thesis Supervisor A ccepted by ......................... T(omas J. reytak Professor, Associate Department Head for ducation MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE T1999 LIBRARIES Helicity Density Matrix Formalism and Polarized Processes in QCD by Jian Tang Submitted to the Department of Physics on May 26, 1999, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Abstract In this thesis, we shall first present helicity density matrix formalism to deal with the polarized processes in quantum chromodynamics(QCD), in which the calculations of the desired cross sections (or asymmetries in many cases) are simplified to take traces of products of helicity density matrices in the underlying particles' (partons, hadrons, etc.) helicity spaces. The parton distribution and fragmentation functions turn out to be the helicity density matrix elements which survive the QCD symmetries. The main advantages of this formalism are that it has very clear physical pictures, simplifies the calculation, and, most importantly, can be easily used to deal with interference effects between different partial waves in multiparticle production in semi-inclusive processes. Then this formalism will be used to propose new ways to measure nu- cleon's transversity, the least known quark distribution function inside the nucleon at leading twist (twist-two).
    [Show full text]
  • The Deuteron Tensor Structure Function B1
    The Deuteron Tensor Structure Function b1 A Proposal to Jefferson Lab PAC-40 (Update to PR12-11-110) K. Allada, A. Camsonne, J.-P. Chen,† A. Deur, D. Gaskell, M. Jones, C. Keith, J. Pierce, P. Solvignon,† S. Wood, J. Zhang Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606 O. Rondon Aramayo,† D. Crabb, D. B. Day, C. Hanretty, D. Keller,† R. Lindgren, S. Liuti, B. Norum, Zhihong Ye, X. Zheng University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903 N. Kalantarians† Hampton University, Hampton VA 23668 T. Badman, J. Calarco, J. Dawson, S. Phillips, E. Long,† K. Slifer†‡, R. Zielinski University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03861 G. Ron Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem W. Bertozzi, S. Gilad, J. Huang A. Kelleher, V. Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 †Spokesperson ‡Contact J. Dunne, D. Dutta Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762 K. Adhikari Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529 R. Gilman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854 Seonho Choi, Hoyoung Kang, Hyekoo Kang, Yoomin Oh Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747 Korea H. P. Cheng, H. J. Lu, X. H. Yan Institute of Applied Physics, Huangshan University, Huangshan, P. R. China Y. X. Ye, P. J. Zhu University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, P. R. China B. T. Hu, Y. Zhang Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, P. R. China. Abdellah Ahmidouch Department of Physics, North Carolina A & T State University, Greensboro, NC 27401 Caroline Riedl DESY, Notkestrasse 85, 22603 Hamburg, Germany Abstract The leading twist tensor structure function b1 of spin-1 hadrons provides a unique tool to study partonic effects, while also being sensitive to coherent nuclear properties in the simplest nuclear system.
    [Show full text]
  • Spin Structure of the Proton from Polarized Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Muon-Proton Scattering
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D VOLUME 56, NUMBER 9 1 NOVEMBER 1997 Spin structure of the proton from polarized inclusive deep-inelastic muon-proton scattering D. Adams,17 B. Adeva,19 E. Arik,2 A. Arvidson,22,a B. Badelek,22,24 M. K. Ballintijn,14 G. Bardin,18,b G. Baum,1 P. Berglund,7 L. Betev,12 I. G. Bird,18,c R. Birsa,21 P. Bjo¨rkholm,22,d B. E. Bonner,17 N. de Botton,18 M. Boutemeur,25,e F. Bradamante,21 A. Bravar,10 A. Bressan,21 S. Bu¨ltmann,1,f E. Burtin,18 C. Cavata,18 D. Crabb,23 J. Cranshaw,17,g T. C¸ uhadar,2 S. Dalla Torre,21 R. van Dantzig,14 B. Derro,3 A. Deshpande,25 S. Dhawan,25 C. Dulya,3,h A. Dyring,22 S. Eichblatt,17,i J. C. Faivre,18 D. Fasching,16,j F. Feinstein,18 C. Fernandez,19,8 B. Frois,18 A. Gallas,19 J. A. Garzon,19,8 T. Gaussiran,17,k M. Giorgi,21 E. von Goeler,15 G. Gracia,19,h N. de Groot,14,l M. Grosse Perdekamp,3,m E. Gu¨lmez,2 D. von Harrach,10 T. Hasegawa,13,n P. Hautle,4,o N. Hayashi,13,p C. A. Heusch,4,q N. Horikawa,13 V. W. Hughes,25 G. Igo,3 S. Ishimoto,13,r T. Iwata,13 E. M. Kabuß,10 A. Karev,9 H. J. Kessler,5 T. J. Ketel,14 A. Kishi,13 Yu. Kisselev,9 L. Klostermann,14,s D.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Plans for the MP Line (Both General and Specific)
    Proceedings of the Symposium on Future Polarization Physics + at Fermilab 13-14 June 1988 F0T0RE PLAUS FOR THE MP LINET ANL-HEP-CP-88-54 (Both General and Specific) /''/"•/\ l::r- /'/'"' P- J 7 David G. Underwood Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne. Illinois 60439 ANL-HEP-CP—88-54 ABSTRACT DE89 003972 This talk consists of three sections. Topics range from suggestions of possible physics, which are presented to provoke thought and discussion about the distant future, to specific goals of E-704 for the next running period. The sections are on physics issues, possible upgrades of the beam and experimental apparatus, and goals for the next running period. PHYSICS ISSUES Many of the experiments and issues discussed at this symposium were viewed with renewed interest in light of the recent EMC results concerning the spin distribution functions for quarks in protons at low x.1 There appear to be Rajor contributions to the overall spin of the proton from either gluon spin or orbital angular momentum. We have heard a talk by Karliner at this symposium and there are a number of papers and activities in progress. Polarized proton beams may assume greater importance in the future because the polarised quarks carry color charge which can couple directly to gluons. Deep inelastic scattering utilizing either electrons or muons has been efficacious because of the electrical charge of the quark. Gluons are not electrically charged. We recall that the large xBj leading quark of a polarized protou is known to carry most of the proton spin, and so is a good probe.
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives 2019 Joshua Hoskins University of Virginia
    High Luminosity Spin-Polarized Target for the SpinQuest Experiment New Perspectives 2019 Joshua Hoskins University of Virginia Polarized Target Group Overview ● SpinQuest experiment at Fermilab ● Spin Polarized Solid Targets 2 Proton’s Spin Structure Central challenge of nuclear physics: to disentangle constituents and spin structure of the nucleon. Since the proposal of the parton model our understanding of the nuclear constituents, quarks and gluons, has grown immensely. The EMC experiment, by the discovery that the contribution of the spins of the quark and anti-quark to the proton’s spin was 12 ± 17%, sparked a multi-decade program with the purpose of understanding the spin structure of the proton. 1 1 = Δ Σ+L +L +Δ G+L 2 2 q ¯q g Tremendous progress has been made in understanding how the nucleon spin is made up from its quark and gluon constituents. The current best estimate of the contribution of the quark and anti-quark spin to the proton’s spin is only ~30%. 3 Spin Physics and E1039 (SpinQuest) SpinQuest proposes direct measurement of the sea-quark Sivers function, using Drell-Yan productions from unpolarized 120 GeV proton beam on a transversely polarized proton (neutron) target. Sivers function – one of eight transverse momentum distribution functions (TMD), describing the correlation of the transverse momentum of an unpolarized parton with the spin of a polarized nucleon. Interest in the contributions of the orbital motion of the sea quarks → data are 1 1 = Δ Σ+L +L +Δ G+L severely lacking. 2 2 q ¯q g → HERMES, COMPASS, Jefferson Lab have provided measurements of the Sivers Function via semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering (SIDIS); Sivers function convoluted with fragmentation function.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Solid Polarized Targets for Nuclear and Particle Physics
    Introduction to Solid Polarized Targets for Nuclear and Particle Physics Chris Keith JLab Target Group Target Group 6 February 2019 1 The basics Spin is an intrinsic property of all elementary particles As well as many composite particles (pay no attention to the higgs) (baryons, mesons, nuclei, atoms…) Target Group 6 February 2019 2 The basics A polarized target is a collection of nuclei (solid or gas) used for a scattering experiment in which most the nuclear spins point in the same direction Target Group 6 February 2019 3 Uses for polarized targets • HALL A Spin structure of hadrons (E12-11-108) SIDIS with a transversely polarized proton target • Sum rules (E12-11-108A) Target single spin asymmetries using SoLID spectrometer • Form Factors • Baryon spectroscopy HALL B (E12-06-109) Longitudinal spin structure of the nucleon • Transverse momentum distributions (E12-06-119) DVCS with CLAS at 12 GeV • Generalized parton distributions (E12-07-107) Spin-orbit correlations with a longitudinally polarized target (E12-09-009) Spin-orbit correlations in kaon electroproduction in DIS • Polarized PDFs (E12-14-001) EMC effect in spin structure functions (6LiH & 7LiD) (E12-15-004) DVCS on the neutron with a longitudinally polarized target (C12-11-111) SIDIS on a transversely polarized target (C12-12-009) Dihadron production in SIDIS on a transversely pol. target (C12-12-010) DVCS on a transversely polarized target in CLAS12 HALL C (E12-14-006) Helicity correlations in wide-angle Compton scattering (C12-13-011) The deuteron tensor structure function b1 (C12-15-005) Meas. of quasi-elastic and elastic deuteron tensor asymm.
    [Show full text]
  • Room Temperature Hyperpolarization of Nuclear Spins in Bulk
    Room temperature hyperpolarization of nuclear spins in bulk Kenichiro Tateishia,b,1, Makoto Negoroa,1,2, Shinsuke Nishidac,3, Akinori Kagawaa, Yasushi Moritac,3, and Masahiro Kitagawaa aDepartment of Systems Innovation, Division of Advanced Electronics and Optical Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan; bRIKEN Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan; and cDepartment of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan Edited by Jack H. Freed, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 16, 2014 (received for review August 20, 2013) Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP), a means of transferring spin singlet state to the triplet state, the population distribution is polarization from electrons to nuclei, can enhance the nuclear spin highly biased. DNP using electron spins in the photo-excited polarization (hence the NMR sensitivity) in bulk materials at most triplet state can achieve hyperpolarization independent of the 660 times for 1H spins, using electron spins in thermal equilibrium magnetic field strength and temperature (13–16). In this work, as polarizing agents. By using electron spins in photo-excited trip- we have achieved a bulk hyperpolarization of 34% and corre- let states instead, DNP can overcome the above limit. We demon- sponding to 250,000 times enhancement in 0.40 T at room strate a 1H spin polarization of 34%, which gives an enhancement temperature with the following procedure. factor of 250,000 in 0.40 T, while maintaining a bulk sample (∼0.6 The procedure, developed by Henstra et al.
    [Show full text]