Population Structure and Mating Dynamics in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium Discoideum Tracy Edwards Douglas Washington University in St

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Summer 8-15-2016 Population Structure and Mating Dynamics in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum Tracy Edwards Douglas Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Recommended Citation Douglas, Tracy Edwards, "Population Structure and Mating Dynamics in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum" (2016). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 843. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/843 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Division of Biology & Biomedical Sciences Evolution, Ecology & Population Biology Dissertation Examination Committee: Joan Strassmann, Chair David Queller, Chair Scott Mangan Ken Olsen James Umen Population Structure and Mating Dynamics in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum by Tracy Edwards Douglas A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2016 St. Louis, Missouri © Copyright 2016 by Tracy Edwards Douglas. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ vi Abstract of the Dissertation ........................................................................................................ ix Chapter 1: Introduction to the Dissertation ................................................................................1 Background ...................................................................................................................................2 Study System ................................................................................................................................4 Dissertation Overview ..................................................................................................................7 Literature Cited .............................................................................................................................9 Chapter 2: Genetic diversity in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum: population differentiation and cryptic species .............................................................................................15 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................16 Introduction ................................................................................................................................17 Materials and Methods ...............................................................................................................20 Results ........................................................................................................................................23 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................27 Literature Cited ..........................................................................................................................32 Chapter 3: Sex ratio and gamete size across eastern North America in Dictyostelium discoideum, a social amoeba with three sexes ...........................................................................42 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................43 Introduction ................................................................................................................................44 Materials and Methods ...............................................................................................................48 Results ........................................................................................................................................52 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................54 Literature Cited ..........................................................................................................................58 Chapter 4: Social amoebae mating types do not invest unequally in sexual offspring..........68 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................69 Introduction ................................................................................................................................70 Materials and Methods ...............................................................................................................73 Results ........................................................................................................................................77 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................80 Literature Cited ..........................................................................................................................86 ii Chapter 5: Conclusion to the Dissertation.................................................................................96 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................................101 Appendix 1: Supplementary Tables for Chapter 2 .................................................................104 Appendix 2: Supplementary Tables for Chapter 3 .................................................................109 Appendix 3: Supplementary Figures and Tables for Chapter 4 ...........................................117 iii List of Figures Figure 1.1: Dictyostelium discoideum sexual life cycle. ..............................................................14 Figure 2.1: Geographic locations of Dictyostelium discoideum clones used in Chapter 1 ...........39 Figure 2.2: Bayesian phylogenetic trees created from (a) mitochondrial and (b) ribosomal DNA sequence data, with Bayesian posterior probablilities and cooresponding neighbor-joining bootstrap values.. ...........................................................................................................................40 Figure 2.3: Bayesian phylogenetic tree created from combined mitochondrial and ribosomal DNA sequence data, with Bayesian posterior probabilities and cooresponding neighbor-joining bootstrap values. ............................................................................................................................41 Figure 3.1: Gametes are larger in Virginia, but are the same across mating types. ......................66 Figure 3.2: Mating type proportions vary by population. .............................................................67 Figure 4.1: Differential macrocyst production in Dictyostelium discoideum. ..............................91 Figure 4.2: An example of a diffusion chamber between NC4 and V12 with the combinations of clones to be tested and the expected outcomes for each combination. ..........................................92 Figure 4.3: Predicted outcomes of different hypotheses...............................................................93 Figure 4.4: Type I WS205 induces macrocyst production in Type II IR1, and Type II V12 induces macrocyst production in Type I NC4. ..............................................................................94 Figure 4.5: Fewer macrocysts are formed when either mating type in a pairing is very rare. ....95 iv List of Tables Table 2.1: Pairwise Fst values between populations of Dictyostelium discoideum with sample sizes greater than 7 individuals ......................................................................................................38 Table 3.1: FST and G’ST values show differentiation in mating type frequencies and microsatellite allele frequencies between populations of Dictyostelium discoideum ....................65 v Acknowledgments First, I thank my advisors Joan Strassmann and Dave Queller. When I started as an undergraduate researcher, I had no idea how long my journey in their lab would be. For the past decade, they have provided me with academic guidance and support. They encouraged me to love what I do, ask bigger questions, defend my research goals, and find a healthy and satisfying work-life balance. I would not be the scientist I am today were it not for them. I am forever grateful. I thank the rest of my dissertation committee members, Ken Olsen, Jim Umen, and Scott Mangan, for helpful comments, encouragement, and thought-provoking discussions of my dissertation research. I also thank original members of my dissertation committee
Recommended publications
  • Quantitative Evolutionary Analysis of the Life Cycle of Social Amoebae Darja Dubravcic

    Quantitative Evolutionary Analysis of the Life Cycle of Social Amoebae Darja Dubravcic

    Quantitative evolutionary analysis of the life cycle of social amoebae Darja Dubravcic To cite this version: Darja Dubravcic. Quantitative evolutionary analysis of the life cycle of social amoebae. Agricultural sciences. Université René Descartes - Paris V, 2013. English. NNT : 2013PA05T033. tel-00914467 HAL Id: tel-00914467 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00914467 Submitted on 5 Dec 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Université Paris Descartes Ecole doctorale « Interdisciplinaire Européen Frontières de vivant » Laboratory « Ecology & Evolution » UMR7625 Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Physics UMR5588 Quantitative evolutionary analysis of the life cycle of social amoebae By Darja Dubravcic PhD Thesis in: Evolutionary Biology Directed by Minus van Baalen and Clément Nizak Presented on the 15th November 2013 PhD committee: Dr. M. van Baalen, PhD director Dr. C. Nizak, PhD Co-director Prof. V. Nanjundiah, Reviewer Prof. P. Rainey, Reviewer Prof. A. Gardner Prof. J-P. Rieu Prof. J-M Di Meglio Dr. S. de Monte, Invited 2 Abstract Social amoebae are eukaryotic organisms that inhabit soil of almost every climate zone. They are remarkable for their switch from unicellularity to multicellularity as an adaptation to starvation.
  • Protozoologica Special Issue: Protists in Soil Processes

    Protozoologica Special Issue: Protists in Soil Processes

    Acta Protozool. (2012) 51: 201–208 http://www.eko.uj.edu.pl/ap ActA doi:10.4467/16890027AP.12.016.0762 Protozoologica Special issue: Protists in Soil Processes Review paper Ecology of Soil Eumycetozoans Steven L. STEPHENSON1 and Alan FEEST2 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA; 2Institute of Advanced Studies, University of Bristol and Ecosulis ltd., Newton St Loe, Bath, United Kingdom Abstract. Eumycetozoans, commonly referred to as slime moulds, are common to abundant organisms in soils. Three groups of slime moulds (myxogastrids, dictyostelids and protostelids) are recognized, and the first two of these are among the most important bacterivores in the soil microhabitat. The purpose of this paper is first to provide a brief description of all three groups and then to review what is known about their distribution and ecology in soils. Key words: Amoebae, bacterivores, dictyostelids, myxogastrids, protostelids. INTRODUCTION that they are amoebozoans and not fungi (Bapteste et al. 2002, Yoon et al. 2008, Baudalf 2008). Three groups of slime moulds (myxogastrids, dic- One of the idiosyncratic branches of the eukary- tyostelids and protostelids) are recognized (Olive 1970, otic tree of life consists of an assemblage of amoe- 1975). Members of the three groups exhibit consider- boid protists referred to as the supergroup Amoebozoa able diversity in the type of aerial spore-bearing struc- (Fiore-Donno et al. 2010). The most diverse members tures produced, which can range from exceedingly of the Amoebozoa are the eumycetozoans, common- small examples (most protostelids) with only a single ly referred to as slime moulds. Since their discovery, spore to the very largest examples (certain myxogas- slime moulds have been variously classified as plants, trids) that contain many millions of spores.
  • Comparative Genomics of the Social Amoebae Dictyostelium Discoideum

    Comparative Genomics of the Social Amoebae Dictyostelium Discoideum

    Sucgang et al. Genome Biology 2011, 12:R20 http://genomebiology.com/2011/12/2/R20 RESEARCH Open Access Comparative genomics of the social amoebae Dictyostelium discoideum and Dictyostelium purpureum Richard Sucgang1†, Alan Kuo2†, Xiangjun Tian3†, William Salerno1†, Anup Parikh4, Christa L Feasley5, Eileen Dalin2, Hank Tu2, Eryong Huang4, Kerrie Barry2, Erika Lindquist2, Harris Shapiro2, David Bruce2, Jeremy Schmutz2, Asaf Salamov2, Petra Fey6, Pascale Gaudet6, Christophe Anjard7, M Madan Babu8, Siddhartha Basu6, Yulia Bushmanova6, Hanke van der Wel5, Mariko Katoh-Kurasawa4, Christopher Dinh1, Pedro M Coutinho9, Tamao Saito10, Marek Elias11, Pauline Schaap12, Robert R Kay8, Bernard Henrissat9, Ludwig Eichinger13, Francisco Rivero14, Nicholas H Putnam3, Christopher M West5, William F Loomis7, Rex L Chisholm6, Gad Shaulsky3,4, Joan E Strassmann3, David C Queller3, Adam Kuspa1,3,4* and Igor V Grigoriev2 Abstract Background: The social amoebae (Dictyostelia) are a diverse group of Amoebozoa that achieve multicellularity by aggregation and undergo morphogenesis into fruiting bodies with terminally differentiated spores and stalk cells. There are four groups of dictyostelids, with the most derived being a group that contains the model species Dictyostelium discoideum. Results: We have produced a draft genome sequence of another group dictyostelid, Dictyostelium purpureum, and compare it to the D. discoideum genome. The assembly (8.41 × coverage) comprises 799 scaffolds totaling 33.0 Mb, comparable to the D. discoideum genome size. Sequence comparisons suggest that these two dictyostelids shared a common ancestor approximately 400 million years ago. In spite of this divergence, most orthologs reside in small clusters of conserved synteny. Comparative analyses revealed a core set of orthologous genes that illuminate dictyostelid physiology, as well as differences in gene family content.
  • Protistology Mitochondrial Genomes of Amoebozoa

    Protistology Mitochondrial Genomes of Amoebozoa

    Protistology 13 (4), 179–191 (2019) Protistology Mitochondrial genomes of Amoebozoa Natalya Bondarenko1, Alexey Smirnov1, Elena Nassonova1,2, Anna Glotova1,2 and Anna Maria Fiore-Donno3 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia 2 Laboratory of Cytology of Unicellular Organisms, Institute of Cytology RAS, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia 3 University of Cologne, Institute of Zoology, Terrestrial Ecology, 50674 Cologne, Germany | Submitted November 28, 2019 | Accepted December 10, 2019 | Summary In this mini-review, we summarize the current knowledge on mitochondrial genomes of Amoebozoa. Amoebozoa is a major, early-diverging lineage of eukaryotes, containing at least 2,400 species. At present, 32 mitochondrial genomes belonging to 18 amoebozoan species are publicly available. A dearth of information is particularly obvious for two major amoebozoan clades, Variosea and Tubulinea, with just one mitochondrial genome sequenced for each. The main focus of this review is to summarize features such as mitochondrial gene content, mitochondrial genome size variation, and presence or absence of RNA editing, showing if they are unique or shared among amoebozoan lineages. In addition, we underline the potential of mitochondrial genomes for multigene phylogenetic reconstruction in Amoebozoa, where the relationships among lineages are not fully resolved yet. With the increasing application of next-generation sequencing techniques and reliable protocols, we advocate mitochondrial
  • Zygote Gene Expression and Plasmodial Development in Didymium Iridis

    Zygote Gene Expression and Plasmodial Development in Didymium Iridis

    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations College of Science and Health Summer 8-25-2019 Zygote gene expression and plasmodial development in Didymium iridis Sean Schaefer DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Schaefer, Sean, "Zygote gene expression and plasmodial development in Didymium iridis" (2019). College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations. 322. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/322 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Science and Health at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zygote gene expression and plasmodial development in Didymium iridis A Thesis presented in Partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Biology By Sean Schaefer 2019 Advisor: Dr. Margaret Silliker Department of Biological Sciences College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, IL Abstract: Didymium iridis is a cosmopolitan species of plasmodial slime mold consisting of two distinct life stages. Haploid amoebae and diploid plasmodia feed on microscopic organisms such as bacteria and fungi through phagocytosis. Sexually compatible haploid amoebae act as gametes which when fused embark on an irreversible developmental change resulting in a diploid zygote. The zygote can undergo closed mitosis resulting in a multinucleated plasmodium. Little is known about changes in gene expression during this developmental transition. Our principal goal in this study was to provide a comprehensive list of genes likely to be involved in plasmodial development.
  • Dictyostelid Cellular Slime Molds from Caves

    Dictyostelid Cellular Slime Molds from Caves

    John C. Landolt, Steven L. Stephenson, and Michael E. Slay – Dictyostelid cellular slime molds from caves. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. 68, no. 1, p. 22–26. DICTYOSTELID CELLULAR SLIME MOLDS FROM CAVES JOHN C. LANDOLT Department of Biology, Shepherd University, Shepherdstown, WV 2544 USA [email protected] STEVEN L. STEPHENSON Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA [email protected] MICHAEL E. SLAY The Nature Conservancy, 601 North University Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA [email protected] Dictyostelid cellular slime molds associated with caves in Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Missouri, New York, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia, Puerto Rico, and San Salvador in the Bahamas were investigated during the period of 1990–2005. Samples of soil material collected from more than 100 caves were examined using standard methods for isolating dictyostelids. At least 17 species were recovered, along with a number of isolates that could not be identified completely. Four cos- mopolitan species (Dictyostelium sphaerocephalum, D. mucoroides, D. giganteum and Polysphondylium violaceum) and one species (D. rosarium) with a more restricted distribution were each recorded from more than 25 different caves, but three other species were present in more than 20 caves. The data gen- erated in the present study were supplemented with all known published and unpublished records of dic- tyostelids from caves in an effort to summarize what is known about their occurrence in this habitat. INTRODUCTION also occur on dung and were once thought to be primarily coprophilous (Raper, 1984). However, perhaps the most Dictyostelid cellular slime molds (dictyostelids) are single- unusual microhabitat for dictyostelids is the soil material celled, eukaryotic, phagotrophic bacterivores usually present found in caves.
  • The Social Amoeba Polysphondylium Pallidum Loses Encystation And

    The Social Amoeba Polysphondylium Pallidum Loses Encystation And

    Protist, Vol. 165, 569–579, September 2014 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 14 July 2014 ORIGINAL PAPER The Social Amoeba Polysphondylium pallidum Loses Encystation and Sporulation, but Can Still Erect Fruiting Bodies in the Absence of Cellulose 1 Qingyou Du, and Pauline Schaap College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, MSI/WTB/JBC complex, Dow Street, Dundee, DD15EH, UK Submitted May 20, 2014; Accepted July 8, 2014 Monitoring Editor: Michael Melkonian Amoebas and other freely moving protists differentiate into walled cysts when exposed to stress. As cysts, amoeba pathogens are resistant to biocides, preventing treatment and eradication. Lack of gene modification procedures has left the mechanisms of encystation largely unexplored. Genetically tractable Dictyostelium discoideum amoebas require cellulose synthase for formation of multicellular fructifications with cellulose-rich stalk and spore cells. Amoebas of its distant relative Polysphondylium pallidum (Ppal), can additionally encyst individually in response to stress. Ppal has two cellulose syn- thase genes, DcsA and DcsB, which we deleted individually and in combination. Dcsa- mutants formed fruiting bodies with normal stalks, but their spore and cyst walls lacked cellulose, which obliterated stress-resistance of spores and rendered cysts entirely non-viable. A dcsa-/dcsb- mutant made no walled spores, stalk cells or cysts, although simple fruiting structures were formed with a droplet of amoeboid cells resting on an sheathed column of decaying cells. DcsB is expressed in prestalk and stalk cells, while DcsA is additionally expressed in spores and cysts. We conclude that cellulose is essential for encystation and that cellulose synthase may be a suitable target for drugs to prevent encystation and render amoeba pathogens susceptible to conventional antibiotics.
  • Activated Camp Receptors Switch Encystation Into Sporulation

    Activated Camp Receptors Switch Encystation Into Sporulation

    Activated cAMP receptors switch encystation into sporulation Yoshinori Kawabea, Takahiro Moriob, John L. Jamesa, Alan R. Prescottb, Yoshimasa Tanakab, and Pauline Schaapa,1 aCollege of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, Angus, DD15EH, United Kingdom; and bGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan Edited by Peter N. Devreotes, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and approved March 12, 2009 (received for review February 13, 2009) Metazoan embryogenesis is controlled by a limited number of in the most derived group 4 (4). During D. discoideum devel- signaling modules that are used repetitively at successive devel- opment, the deeply conserved intracellular messenger cAMP opmental stages. The development of social amoebas shows sim- has multiple roles as a secreted signal, detected by 4 homologous ilar reiterated use of cAMP-mediated signaling. In the model cAMP receptors (cAR1–4) (5). cAMP pulses coordinate the Dictyostelium discoideum, secreted cAMP acting on 4 cAMP recep- aggregation of starving cells and organize the construction of tors (cARs1-4) coordinates cell movement during aggregation and fruiting bodies with a highly regulated pattern of spores and stalk fruiting body formation, and induces the expression of aggrega- cells. Secreted cAMP also up-regulates expression of aggrega- tion and sporulation genes at consecutive developmental stages. tion genes, induces expression of spore genes, and inhibits stalk To identify hierarchy in the multiple roles of cAMP, we investigated gene expression (6). cAR heterogeneity and function across the social amoeba phylog- Single cAR genes were previously detected in 3 more basal eny. The gene duplications that yielded cARs 2-4 occurred late in dictyostelid taxa, but were only expressed after aggregation.
  • Genetic Heterogeneity in Wild Isolates of Cellular Slime Mold Social Groups

    Genetic Heterogeneity in Wild Isolates of Cellular Slime Mold Social Groups

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Publications of the IAS Fellows Microb Ecol (2010) 60:137–148 DOI 10.1007/s00248-010-9635-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Genetic Heterogeneity in Wild Isolates of Cellular Slime Mold Social Groups Santosh Sathe & Sonia Kaushik & Albert Lalremruata & Ramesh K. Aggarwal & James C. Cavender & Vidyanand Nanjundiah Received: 27 September 2009 /Accepted: 26 December 2009 /Published online: 24 February 2010 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Abstract This study addresses the issues of spatial distri- Introduction bution, dispersal, and genetic heterogeneity in social groups of the cellular slime molds (CSMs). The CSMs are soil The existence and implication of spatial structuring in amoebae with an unusual life cycle that consists of microbial populations is a theme of long-standing interest in alternating solitary and social phases. Because the social ecology [36]. At one extreme, there is the hypothesis that— phase involves division of labor with what appears to be an as with large animals—populations tend to be more or less extreme form of “altruism”, the CSMs raise interesting viscous, and spatial structure is determined by patterns of evolutionary questions regarding the origin and maintenance dispersal. At the other extreme, there is the view that of sociality. Knowledge of the genetic structure of social dispersal is rampant (“everything is everywhere”) and what groups in the wild is necessary for answering these persists is determined by adaptations to local conditions. In questions. We confirm that CSMs are widespread in the case of social organisms, an important aspect of spatial undisturbed forest soil from South India.
  • Protistology an International Journal Vol

    Protistology an International Journal Vol

    Protistology An International Journal Vol. 10, Number 2, 2016 ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC FORUM «PROTIST–2016» Yuri Mazei (Vice-Chairman) Welcome Address 2 Organizing Committee 3 Organizers and Sponsors 4 Abstracts 5 Author Index 94 Forum “PROTIST-2016” June 6–10, 2016 Moscow, Russia Website: http://onlinereg.ru/protist-2016 WELCOME ADDRESS Dear colleagues! Republic) entitled “Diplonemids – new kids on the block”. The third lecture will be given by Alexey The Forum “PROTIST–2016” aims at gathering Smirnov (Saint Petersburg State University, Russia): the researchers in all protistological fields, from “Phylogeny, diversity, and evolution of Amoebozoa: molecular biology to ecology, to stimulate cross- new findings and new problems”. Then Sandra disciplinary interactions and establish long-term Baldauf (Uppsala University, Sweden) will make a international scientific cooperation. The conference plenary presentation “The search for the eukaryote will cover a wide range of fundamental and applied root, now you see it now you don’t”, and the fifth topics in Protistology, with the major focus on plenary lecture “Protist-based methods for assessing evolution and phylogeny, taxonomy, systematics and marine water quality” will be made by Alan Warren DNA barcoding, genomics and molecular biology, (Natural History Museum, United Kingdom). cell biology, organismal biology, parasitology, diversity and biogeography, ecology of soil and There will be two symposia sponsored by ISoP: aquatic protists, bioindicators and palaeoecology. “Integrative co-evolution between mitochondria and their hosts” organized by Sergio A. Muñoz- The Forum is organized jointly by the International Gómez, Claudio H. Slamovits, and Andrew J. Society of Protistologists (ISoP), International Roger, and “Protists of Marine Sediments” orga- Society for Evolutionary Protistology (ISEP), nized by Jun Gong and Virginia Edgcomb.
  • The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes

    The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231610049 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes Article in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · September 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 961 2,825 25 authors, including: Sina M Adl Alastair Simpson University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University 118 PUBLICATIONS 8,522 CITATIONS 264 PUBLICATIONS 10,739 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Christopher E Lane David Bass University of Rhode Island Natural History Museum, London 82 PUBLICATIONS 6,233 CITATIONS 464 PUBLICATIONS 7,765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and ecology of soil taste amoeba View project Predator control of diversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Smirnov Alexey on 25 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D.
  • Raper (Personal Communication) with More Extensive Ex- Perience Has Confirmed This Observation

    Raper (Personal Communication) with More Extensive Ex- Perience Has Confirmed This Observation

    68 BOTANY: A. L. COHEN PROC. N. A. S. THE EFFECT OF AMMONIA ON MORPHOGENESIS IN THE A CRASIEAE* By ARTHUR L. COHEN OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY, GEORGIA Communicated by F. W. Went, November 10, 1952 The peculiar separation of mass increase and morphogenesis in the Acrasieae has led to renewed interest by several workers, among them RaPer,1 2 Bonner,3 Gregg,4 and Sussman,5 all of whom have taken advan- tage of this fact. The remarkable life history is well given by Raper6 and by Bonnr.7 The present paper is the initial report of a program of studies on the influence of physicochemical factors in the morphogenesis of these organisms. The Acrasieae described by Olive8 in the most extensive monograph df the group show a well-graded series of increasing complexity as pointed out by Raper6 from the almost chance aggregation of cysts in Sappinia through sessile and stalked fruits in Guttulina and Guttulinopsis in which stalk and spore cells are indistinctly differentiated to the complex differentiation of stalk and spore mass in Dictyostelium and a regularly branching arrange- ment in Polysphondylium. It would therefore be worth while to get a range of these forms in culture for the study of the factors involved in in- creasing morphogenetic complexity. For ten years I have cultured soil samples as opportunity permitted in an attempt to obtain a series of forms. During the last two years a systematic selective culture of 79 soil samples from diverse habitats in Georgia, Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan has yielded about as many strains of Dictyostelium and Polysphondylium species, but no member of the "lower Acrasieae." Raper (personal communication) with more extensive ex- perience has confirmed this observation.