Representations of France and the French in English Satirical Prints, C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Representations of France and the French in English Satirical Prints, C View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenGrey Repository Representations of France and the French in English Satirical Prints, c. 1740-1832 Vol. 1:2 John Richard Moores Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of York History September 2011 Abstract This thesis explores representations of France and the French in English satirical prints in the period c. 1740-1832. This was an era of rivalry and conflict between the two nations. It has been suggested that hostility towards France at this time contributed to the formation of English, or British, national identity. This coincided with England’s ‘golden age of caricature’. While much of the satirical art produced focussed on France, most studies of this material have dealt with how the English portrayed themselves and each other. Those which have discussed representations of the French have promoted the view that English perceptions of the French were principally hostile. While there is a temptation to employ such prints as evidence of English Francophobia, a closer investigation reveals greater satirical complexities at work which do not simply conceptualise and employ the French ‘Other’ as target of hatred. Informed by war and rivalry, as well as by trade, travel, and cultural exchange, the prints projected some positive characteristics onto the French ‘Other’, they contain varying degrees of sympathy and affinity with the French, and are demonstrative of a relationship more distinct and intimate than that shared with any other nation. At the same time, the prints expose many of the tensions and divisions that existed within Britain itself. French characters were employed to directly attack British political figures, while in other instances domestic anxieties were projected onto images of the French. 1 Contents Volume 1:2 Acknowledgments 3 Author’s Declaration 5 Introduction 6 Chapter One: Studying Satirical Prints 10 Chapter Two: Frenchmen, Food and Fashion 46 Chapter Three: Kings and Leaders 76 1) Pre-revolutionary Kings and Politicians 76 2) Religion 101 3) Napoleon 124 4) Restoration 152 5) Summary 165 Chapter Four: War (and Peace) 168 1) Politics, Propaganda and Peace 168 2) The Battlefield 192 3) Summary 202 Chapter Five: Revolution 204 Chapter Six: Women and other ‘Others’ 237 1) Women 237 2) Other ‘Others’ 257 3) Summary 277 Conclusion 280 Bibliography 287 Volume 2:2 Illustrations 2 Acknowledgements My first thanks must go to my supervisor Alan Forrest. He provided invaluable advice, encouragement and support throughout. I would also like to thank John Barrell, whose feedback on my work and knowledge of the material were instrumental in shaping this thesis. Catriona Kennedy provided useful guidance and reassurance, as did Geoffrey Cubitt who subsequently acted as internal examiner. I am similarly grateful to my external examiner Matthew Shaw. I must also express my gratitude to the staff at both the King’s Manor and JB Morrell libraries at York, as well as those at the Department of Prints and Drawings in the British Museum who were all extremely friendly, helpful, accommodating, and quick to respond to any correspondence. In a more virtual capacity, I am also indebted to the British Museum’s abundant digital collection database and the Lewis Walpole Library’s digital image collection, both of which played a vital part in my research and provided many of the images discussed. I would also like to thank the administrative staff in the History Department of the University of York and Clare Bond at the Centre for Eighteenth Century Studies for all their assistance. Various parts of this work have been presented in papers at the Eighteenth Century Worlds’ ‘Civilians and War in Europe c. 1640-1815’ conference, the Centre for Metropolitan History’s ‘Cities and Nationalisms’ conference, and the ‘British Society for Eighteenth Century Studies Annual Conference’. For the latter, I would like to thank my collaborators on York’s panel on ‘National identity and emotion in the long eighteenth century’: Graeme Callister and Amy Milka. Papers were also presented as various departmental and interdisciplinary postgraduate forums and conferences at the University of York. My thanks go to those who kindly invited me to present these papers and those who asked questions, made comments, and offered advice. My thanks also to the York Georgian Society which in 2010 honoured my work with a Patrick Nuttgens 3 Award of High Commendation. Christopher Moores and Stephanie King provided valuable advice in the closing stages of the work. Finally, I would like to thank my family for all their patience, support and encouragement, and my partner Stephanie whose contribution to this thesis, and to my life, cannot be put into words. 4 Author’s Declaration An early version of Chapter Four was presented at the Eighteenth Century Worlds’ ‘Civilians and War in Europe c. 1640-1815’ conference at the University of Liverpool in June 2009. Certain elements of Chapter Two were presented in a paper at the Centre for Metropolitan History’s ‘Cities and Nationalisms’ conference held at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, London, in June 2010. A version of the ‘Religion’ section of Chapter Three was presented at the ‘British Society for Eighteenth Century Studies Annual Conference’ at St. Hugh’s College, Oxford, in January 2011. 5 Introduction Between the years of 1740 and 1832, Britain witnessed what has become known as its ‘golden age’ of caricature.1 This period was also characterised by dramatic social and political change both at home and abroad. Britain’s relationship with France during this time was particularly turbulent, leading to suggestions that British or English national identity was forged thanks to hostility towards the French ‘Other’.2 Visual prints remain an overlooked area of study, and those scholars who have tackled such material have tended to focus on how the British depicted themselves and each other.3 The studies which have focussed on graphic portrayals of foreigners and of the French have been too brief to explore the prints and their complexities in detail and have generally promoted the view that English perceptions of the French were defined by hostility, antagonism and derision.4 Although British interest in France never disappears, the obsession with that nation was particularly strong during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. By the eighteenth century, France’s wealth and influence had superseded those of other continental nations such as Spain. France thus became Britain’s most powerful rival. Representations of the French were informed by this rivalry, and by the numerous wars which broke out between the two countries. They were also informed by travel, by an attraction to French fashions and culture, and by a close attention to the interior workings of France. The satirical depictions, which at first appear to be straightforward expressions of Francophobia, also contain evidence of familiarity, empathy, and a kinship with France, one more intimate than that shared with any other nation. 1 Though some might argue that ‘London’s Golden Age’ would be more accurate, and there is also debate over whether the term ‘caricature’ should be applied to a body of material of such disparate styles - see Chapter One. 2 Gerald Newman, The Rise of English Nationalism: A cultural history, 1740-1830 (London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1987); Linda Colley, Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707-1837 (London: Yale University Press, 2005). 3 See Chapter One. 4 Michael Duffy, The Englishman and the Foreigner (Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey, 1986); Michael Duffy, ‘The Noisie, Empty, Fluttering French: English Images of the French, 1689-1815’, History Today 32 (1982), pp. 21-26; see Chapter One. 6 Prints on the French ‘Other’ also reveal many of the tensions that existed within Britain itself, for domestic anxieties were projected onto images of the French. Sometimes this was done fairly directly, with French characters employed as tools with which to undermine the reputations of British politicians. At other times, attacks on the British political system and on social inequalities, and more general condemnation of subjects such as tyranny, religion, and corruption, were implied through representations of French leaders. Many of the prints on fashion, meanwhile, were less concerned with the actions of Frenchmen than on those of a particular type of Englishman. This thesis begins by exploring the methodology and historiography of satirical print studies, the advantages of this material and the problems it causes for historians, the methods of production and sale, the reach and diversity of its audience (Chapter One). Focus then turns to imagery on France and French, and is arranged thematically. Chapter Two looks at cultural and social representations, though of course such depictions were unavoidably tied to the political. This chapter discusses the concerns about diminishing English masculinity that were projected onto representations of Frenchmen and their English imitators, the ‘macaronis’. While much of this imagery could be said to have been inspired by fears of a ‘dilution of British stock’ and of a French cultural invasion, it was also a subject which inspired jovial amusement. These portrayals derided the popularity of French culture in England, but in doing so provided proof of the potency and consistency of this popularity. Chapter Three moves upwards from the more generic stereotypes of the French ‘people’ to the political and religious rulers of France. It explores the ways in which images of the French could be used to express dissatisfaction with domestic political and religious leaders (both directly and indirectly). It questions the extent 7 to which British conceptions of themselves and the French relied on Protestant Anti-Catholicism. It investigates the way French rulers were not necessarily thought to be representative of their subjects, and that it was usually French and British leaders, rather than the French people, who were the targets of hatred.
Recommended publications
  • Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2014 Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789 Kiley Bickford University of Maine - Main Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Cultural History Commons Recommended Citation Bickford, Kiley, "Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789" (2014). Honors College. 147. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/147 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIONALISM IN THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 by Kiley Bickford A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a Degree with Honors (History) The Honors College University of Maine May 2014 Advisory Committee: Richard Blanke, Professor of History Alexander Grab, Adelaide & Alan Bird Professor of History Angela Haas, Visiting Assistant Professor of History Raymond Pelletier, Associate Professor of French, Emeritus Chris Mares, Director of the Intensive English Institute, Honors College Copyright 2014 by Kiley Bickford All rights reserved. Abstract The French Revolution of 1789 was instrumental in the emergence and growth of modern nationalism, the idea that a state should represent, and serve the interests of, a people, or "nation," that shares a common culture and history and feels as one. But national ideas, often with their source in the otherwise cosmopolitan world of the Enlightenment, were also an important cause of the Revolution itself. The rhetoric and documents of the Revolution demonstrate the importance of national ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish, French, Dutch, Andamerican Patriots of Thb West Indies During
    Spanish, French, Dutch, andAmerican Patriots of thb West Indies i# During the AMERICAN Revolution PART7 SPANISH BORDERLAND STUDIES By Granvil~ W. andN. C. Hough -~ ,~~~.'.i~:~ " :~, ~i " .... - ~ ,~ ~"~" ..... "~,~~'~~'-~ ,%v t-5.._. / © Copyright ,i. "; 2001 ~(1 ~,'~': .i: • by '!!|fi:l~: r!;.~:! Granville W. and N. C. Hough 3438 Bahia Blanca West, Apt B ~.l.-c • Laguna Hills, CA 92653-2830 !LI.'.. Email: gwhough(~earthiink.net u~ "~: .. ' ?-' ,, i.. Other books in this series include: • ...~ , Svain's California Patriots in its 1779-1783 War with England - During the.American Revolution, Part 1, 1998. ,. Sp~fin's Califomi0 Patriqts in its 1779-1783 Wor with Englgnd - During the American Revolution, Part 2, :999. Spain's Arizona Patriots in ire |779-1783 War with Engl~n~i - During the Amcricgn RevolutiQn, Third Study of the Spanish Borderlands, 1999. Svaln's New Mexico Patriots in its 1779-|783 Wit" wi~ England- During the American Revolution, Fourth Study of the Spanish Borderlands, 1999. Spain's Texa~ patriot~ in its 1779-1783 War with Enaland - Daring the A~a~ri~n Revolution, Fifth Study of the Spanish Borderlands, 2000. Spain's Louisi~a Patriots in its; 1779-1783 War witil England - During.the American Revolution, Sixth StUdy of the Spanish Borderlands, 20(~0. ./ / . Svain's Patriots of Northerrt New Svain - From South of the U. S. Border - in its 1779- 1783 War with Engl~nd_ Eighth Study of the Spanish Borderlands, coming soon. ,:.Z ~JI ,. Published by: SHHAK PRESS ~'~"'. ~ ~i~: :~ .~:,: .. Society of Hispanic Historical and Ancestral Research ~.,~.,:" P.O. Box 490 Midway City, CA 92655-0490 (714) 894-8161 ~, ~)it.,I ,.
    [Show full text]
  • Tadcaster (1877)
    TesioPower jadehorse Tadcaster (1877) WAXY 18 WHALEBONE PENELOPE 1 Sir Hercules Wanderer 11 Peri Thalestris 2 Birdcatcher (1833) Chanticleer 3 Bob Booty Ierne 23 Guiccioli Escape 27 Flight Y Heroine 11 The Baron (1842) WAXY 18 WHISKER PENELOPE 1 Economist Octavian 8 Floranthe Caprice 36 Echidna (1838) Whitelock 2 BLACKLOCK Coriander Mare 2 Miss Pratt ORVILLE 8 Gadabout Minstrel 24 Stockwell (1849) Buzzard 3 SELIM Alexander Mare 2 Sultan Williamson's Ditto 7 Bacchante Mercury Mare 8 Glencoe (1831) Dick Andrews 9 Tramp Gohanna Mare 3 Trampoline WAXY 18 Web PENELOPE 1 Pocahontas (1837) BENINGBROUGH 7 ORVILLE Evelina 8 Muley WHISKEY 2 Eleanor Y Giantess 6 Marpessa (1830) WHISKEY 2 Marmion Y Noisette 28 Clare GOHANNA 24 Harpalice Amazon 3 Doncaster (1870) WHALEBONE 1 Camel Selim Mare (24) 24 TOUCHSTONE Master Henry 3 Banter Boadicea 14 Orlando (1841) SELIM 2 Langar Walton Mare 6 Vulture Bustard 35 Kite Olympia 13 Teddington (1848) Comus 25 HUMPHREY CLINKER Clinkerina 8 Rockingham Swordsman 2 Medora Trumpator Mare 1 Miss Twickenham (1838) GOHANNA 24 Election Chesnut Skim 5 Electress STAMFORD 30 Stamford Mare Miss Judy 2 Marigold (1860) Whitelock 2 BLACKLOCK Coriander Mare 2 Buzzard Delpini 30 Miss Newton Tipple Cyder 8 Ratan (1841) Smolensko 18 Picton Dick Andrews Mare 3 Picton Mare SELIM 2 Selim Mare Pipator Mare 9 Ratan Mare (1852) Comus 25 HUMPHREY CLINKER Clinkerina 8 Melbourne Cervantes 8 Cervantes Mare Golumpus Mare 1 Melbourne Mare (1844) HAMBLETONIAN 1 Phantom Precipitate Mare (5) 5 Lisbeth Rainbow 29 Elizabeth Belvoirina 5 Pot80's 38
    [Show full text]
  • Capetian France (987–1328)
    FORUM Capetian France (987–1328) Introduction Damien Kempf If “France is a creation of its medieval history,”1 the rule of the Cape- tian dynasty (987–1328) in particular is traditionally regarded as the beginning of France as a nation.2 Following the narrative established by Joseph Strayer’s influential bookOn the Medieval Origins of the Mod- ern State, historians situate the construction of the French nation- state in the thirteenth century, under the reigns of Philip Augustus (1180– 1223) and Louis IX (1226–70). Territorial expansion, the development of bureaucracy, and the centralization of the royal government all con- tributed to the formation of the state in France.3 Thus it is only at the end of a long process of territorial expansion and royal affirmation that the Capetian kings managed to turn what was initially a disparate and fragmented territory into a unified kingdom, which prefigured the modern state. In this teleological framework, there is little room or interest for the first Capetian kings. The eleventh and twelfth centuries are still described as the “âge des souverains,” a period of relative anarchy and disorder during which the aristocracy dominated the political land- scape and lordship was the “normative expression of human power.”4 Compared to these powerful lords, the early Capetians pale into insignifi- cance. They controlled a royal domain centered on Paris and Orléans and struggled to keep at bay the lords dominating the powerful sur- rounding counties and duchies. The famous anecdote reported by the Damien Kempf is senior lecturer in medieval history at the University of Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Inviolability Controversy in the Trial of Louis XVI Ronald L
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 20 Article 19 1966 Inviolability Controversy in the Trial of Louis XVI Ronald L. Hayworth University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Hayworth, Ronald L. (1966) "Inviolability Controversy in the Trial of Louis XVI," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 20 , Article 19. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol20/iss1/19 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 20 [1966], Art. 19 111 Arkansas Academy of Science Proceedings, Vol. 20, 1966 THE INVIOLABILITYCONTROVERSY IN THE TRIAL OF LOUIS XVI Ronald L. Hay worth Arkansas College The attempt at constitutional monarchy during the French Revolu- tion ended abruptly on August 10, 1792, with the dethronement of Louis XVI in what has been termed the Second French Revolution. 1 One major problem that the new National Convention faced when it convened in mid-September was the determination of the fate of the ci-devant roi.
    [Show full text]
  • Caricature: the Loaded Drawing
    Caricature: The Loaded Drawing The taste of the day leans entirely to caricature. We have lost our relish for the simple beauties of nature. We are no longer satisfied with propriety and neatness, we must have something grotesque and disproportioned, cumbrous with ornament and gigantic in its dimensions Morning Chronicles 1 1, August, 1796 Exaggeration in visual expression is found in nearly all cultures and throughout most historical periods. What this paper will discuss is the use of caricature to communicate satirical/humorous content in visual genres of Western Europe and specifically 18th Century England by highlighting the work of James Gillray. Caricature of Libyan leader Caricature is a form of visual exaggeration/distortion Muammar Gaddafi held by that generally pertains to the human face and/or figure drawn protestors on 2. 27. 2011. Source: NY Times online for humorous, critical or vindictive motives. As the title suggests, a particular facial part is exaggerated to catch the viewers’ attention and relate that quality to underlying aspects of the personality – hence a caricature is a portrait that is loaded with meaning rather than mere description. The centuries old premise to this interpretation is that outward appearances belie personality traits. A second interpretation of caricature - and the one this paper focuses on - combines the transformative aspects of caricature rendering techniques with satire to produce graphic images that provoke meaning in political, social and moral arenas. A verbal cousin to visual caricature is satire. Satirizing the human condition is as universal as exaggeration, and while found in early Greco- Roman art and literature wanes through the medieval period.
    [Show full text]
  • The War of 1812 and American Self-Image
    Educational materials developed through the Howard County History Labs Program, a partnership between the Howard County Public School System and the UMBC Center for History Education. The War of 1812 and American Self-Image Historical Thinking Skills Assessed: Sourcing, Close Reading, Corroboration Author/School/System: Emily Savopoulos, Howard County Public School System, Maryland Course: United States History Level: Middle Task Question: How did Americans' opinion of the United States change during the War of 1812? Learning Outcome: Students will be able to describe the change in opinion of Americans toward the United States during the War of 1812 based on a close reading and corroboration of two editorial cartoons. Standards Alignment: Common Core Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies RH.6-8.1 Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources. RH.6-8.2 Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary of the source distinct from prior knowledge or opinions. RH.6-8.7 Integrate visual information (e.g. charts, graphs, photographs, videos, or maps) with other information in print and digital texts. National History Standards Era 3: Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s) Standard 3: The institutions and practices of government created during the Revolution and how they were revised between 1787 and 1815 to create the foundation of the American political system based on the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies Standards D2.His.2.6-8 Classify series of historical events and developments as examples of change and/or continuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 544 H-France Review Vol. 3 (October 2003), No. 124 DMG
    H-France Review Volume 3 (2003) Page 544 H-France Review Vol. 3 (October 2003), No. 124 D.M.G. Sutherland , The French Revolution and Empire: The Quest for a Civic Order . Malden, Mass., Oxford, Melbourne, and Berlin: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. viii + 424 pp. Map, bibliography, and index. $27.95 U.S. (pb). ISBN 0-631-23363-6. Review by Tracey Rizzo, University of North Carolina at Asheville. D.M.G. Sutherland’s new book, The French Revolution and Empire: The Quest for a Civic Order , is a richer version of his earlier textbook, France; 1789-1815 (Oxford, 1986) in which he presented a compelling case for an interpretation of the Revolution that placed provincial and rural life at the center of the story. He continues to insist that “every crisis of the Revolution after 1789 had its origin in the provinces” (p. 74). Readers will be convinced even more in this edition, which has been augmented with more powerful quotes and updated statistics. Moreover, the author indicates that most of the book has been rewritten, a reflection of the extensive outpouring of new work, including his own recently published in Histoire et Mesure (with T.J.A. Le Goff). The Quest for a Civic Order is a provocative new subtitle for a work that essentially resembles its predecessor in structure and content. Organized chronologically, this book integrates the “revolution and counter-revolution” (the previous edition’s subtitle) in every chapter, thus conveying the degree to which “the vast weight of ancient peasant France,” a sparkling phrase from the last sentence of the first edition, “imposed itself upon the government, at the expense of many of the ideals of 1789" (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Royal Character in the Public Imagination 1
    Notes Introduction: The Royal Character in the Public Imagination 1. I use the words “royal” and “monarch” (and their variants, “royalty,” “monarchy,” “monarchical,” etc.) interchangeably. By the late eigh- teenth century both terms in common usage referred equally to kings and to those who ruled (queens, regents). “Royal” also referred, and still does, to near relatives of the monarch, as in “royal family,” and I use it in this sense also. 2. Austen’s conservatism is famously unstable. Feminist critics espe- cially have suggested that a feminist subtext undercuts or at least tempers the conservative trajectories of her novels. In Equivocal Beings, Claudia Johnson provides a comprehensive discussion of the conservative reading of Emma as well as its implicit feminist critique (192–96). 3. Unlike Pride and Prejudice, in which she was revising an earlier draft, Austen wrote Mansfield Park, Emma, and Persuasion after 1810. She began writing Mansfield Park in February 1811, the same month in which the Regency began (Sturrock 30; see also Tomalin 223–24). 4. Clara Tuite suggests that Mansfield Park can be read as “a provincial deflection of the wider national issues of responsible hereditary gov- ernment” (Romantic Austen 132). 5. The phrase “Queen Caroline affair” historically refers to the events of 1820 and 1821, when the uncrowned King attempted to divorce his wife by Act of Parliament. Although Caroline was technically Queen, supporters of the new King used a variety of means, some political, some rhetorical, to contest her legitimacy. Similarities as well as an evident continuity between this episode and the Prince’s first attempt to obtain a divorce, some fifteen years earlier, have often led scholars to refer to their marital disputes before, during, and after the Regency as the Queen Caroline affair.
    [Show full text]
  • The General Stud Book : Containing Pedigrees of Race Horses, &C
    ^--v ''*4# ^^^j^ r- "^. Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2009 witii funding from Lyrasis IVIembers and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/generalstudbookc02fair THE GENERAL STUD BOOK VOL. II. : THE deiterol STUD BOOK, CONTAINING PEDIGREES OF RACE HORSES, &C. &-C. From the earliest Accounts to the Year 1831. inclusice. ITS FOUR VOLUMES. VOL. II. Brussels PRINTED FOR MELINE, CANS A.ND C"., EOILEVARD DE WATERLOO, Zi. M DCCC XXXIX. MR V. un:ve PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. To assist in the detection of spurious and the correction of inaccu- rate pedigrees, is one of the purposes of the present publication, in which respect the first Volume has been of acknowledged utility. The two together, it is hoped, will form a comprehensive and tole- rably correct Register of Pedigrees. It will be observed that some of the Mares which appeared in the last Supplement (whereof this is a republication and continua- tion) stand as they did there, i. e. without any additions to their produce since 1813 or 1814. — It has been ascertained that several of them were about that time sold by public auction, and as all attempts to trace them have failed, the probability is that they have either been converted to some other use, or been sent abroad. If any proof were wanting of the superiority of the English breed of horses over that of every other country, it might be found in the avidity with which they are sought by Foreigners. The exportation of them to Russia, France, Germany, etc. for the last five years has been so considerable, as to render it an object of some importance in a commercial point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • Grosvenor Prints 19 Shelton Street Covent Garden London WC2H 9JN
    Grosvenor Prints 19 Shelton Street Covent Garden London WC2H 9JN Tel: 020 7836 1979 Fax: 020 7379 6695 E-mail: [email protected] www.grosvenorprints.com Dealers in Antique Prints & Books Prints from the Collection of the Hon. Christopher Lennox-Boyd Arts 3801 [Little Fatima.] [Painted by Frederick, Lord Leighton.] Gerald 2566 Robinson Crusoe Reading the Bible to Robinson. London Published December 15th 1898 by his Man Friday. "During the long timer Arthur Lucas the Proprietor, 31 New Bond Street, W. Mezzotint, proof signed by the engraver, ltd to 275. that Friday had now been with me, and 310 x 490mm. £420 that he began to speak to me, and 'Little Fatima' has an added interest because of its understand me. I was not wanting to lay a Orientalism. Leighton first showed an Oriental subject, foundation of religious knowledge in his a `Reminiscence of Algiers' at the Society of British mind _ He listened with great attention." Artists in 1858. Ten years later, in 1868, he made a Painted by Alexr. Fraser. Engraved by Charles G. journey to Egypt and in the autumn of 1873 he worked Lewis. London, Published Octr. 15, 1836 by Henry in Damascus where he made many studies and where Graves & Co., Printsellers to the King, 6 Pall Mall. he probably gained the inspiration for the present work. vignette of a shipwreck in margin below image. Gerald Philip Robinson (printmaker; 1858 - Mixed-method, mezzotint with remarques showing the 1942)Mostly declared pirnts PSA. wreck of his ship. 640 x 515mm. Tears in bottom Printsellers:Vol.II: margins affecting the plate mark.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 H-France Forum, V
    H-France Forum Volume 4 Page 50 ______________________________________________________________________________ H-France Forum, Volume 4, Issue 2 (Spring 2009), No. 5 Michael Sonenscher, Sans-Culottes: An Eighteenth-Century Emblem in the French Revolution. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008. x + 493 pp. $45.00 U.S. (cl). ISBN 978- 0691124988. Response Essay by Michael Sonenscher, King’s College Cambridge, to the review essays of his book by John Hardman, Thomas E. Kaiser, Charles Walton and Johnson Kent Wright. Perhaps the easiest way to begin a reply to this array of thought-provoking comments is to start with the two factual questions raised by John Hardman. The first concerns the comte d’Angiviller, while the second concerns Charles-Alexandre de Calonne. Answering them is a good way into the questions set out by Thomas E. Kaiser and Charles Walton about the relationship of the sans-culottes to Robespierre, Saint-Just and the Jacobin leadership in 1793 and 1794 and, more broadly, about the similarities and differences in their respective moral values, economic priorities and political visions. Answering their questions is, in turn, a helpful entry point to the questions about eighteenth-century versions of ancient moral and political thought and about the politics of the ancient constitution raised by Johnson Kent Wright. John Hardman asked whether I had any evidence that the comte d’Angiviller was, as I put it, “a strong advocate of a patriotic coup against the nation’s creditors in 1787 and 1788” (p. 378). I made the claim on the basis of a remark by d’Angiviller in the autobiographical fragment entitled Episodes de ma vie that was published posthumously in 1906.
    [Show full text]