DOCSLIB.ORG

The Representation of Knowledge in Library Classification Schemes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Representation of Knowledge in Library Classification Schemes 180 Knowl. Org. 28(2001)No.4 P. Rafferty: The Representation of Knowledge in Library Classification Schemes The Representation of Knowledge in Library Classification Schemes Pauline Rafferty School of Information Studies, University of Central England in Birmingham, Perry Barr, Birmingham, [email protected] Pauline Rafferty is a senior lecturer in the School of Information Studies, University of Central Eng- land in Birmingham. Her research interests include critical and cultural theory and social semiotics, and the application of these research approaches to information retrieval. She is currently working on a novel indexing methodology project, democratic indexing, with SIS colleague, Rob Hidderley. Pauline Rafferty. (2001). The Representation of Knowledge in Library Classification Schemes. Knowledge Organization, 28(4). 180-191. 18 refs. ABSTRACT: This article explores the representation of knowledge through the discursive practice of ‘general’ or ‘universal’ classification schemes. These classification schemes were constructed with- in a philosophical framework which viewed ‘man’ as the central focus in the universe, which believed in progress through sci- ence and research, and which privileged written documentation over other forms. All major classification schemes are built on clearly identifiable systems of knowledge, and all classification schemes, as discursive formations, regulate the ways in which knowledge is made accessible. Of particular interest in determining how knowledge is represented in classification schemes are the following: – Main classes: classification theorists have attempted to ‘discipline epistemology’ in the sense of imposing main class struc- tures with the view to simplifying access to knowledge in documents for library users. – Notational language: a number of classification theorists were particularly interested in the establishment of symbolic lan- guages through notation. The article considers these aspects of classification theory in relation to: the Dewey Decimal Classification scheme; Otlet and La Fontaine’s Universal Bibliographic Classification and the International Institute of Bibliography; Henry Evelyn Bliss’s Biblio- graphic Classification; and S.R. Ranganathan’s Colon Classification. The Representation of Knowledge in Library wonderment of this taxonomy, the thing we ap- Classification Schemes. prehend in one great leap, the thing that, by means of the fable, is demonstrated as the exotic Foucault began ‘The Order of Things’ by quoting a charm of another system of thought, is the limi- passage from Borges, on the monstrous classification tation of our own, the stark impossibility of of animals in ‘a certain Chinese encyclopaedia’. In this thinking that.’ (Foucault 1974, xv) monstrous classification animals are divided into: Foucault argued that within this taxonomy what ‘‘(a) belonging to the Emperor, (b) embalmed, really ‘transgresses the boundaries of all imagination, (c) tame, (d) sucking pigs, (e) sirens, (f) fabulous, of all possible thought, is simply that alphabetical se- (g) stray dogs, (h) included in the present classi- ries (a, b, c, d) which links each of these categories to fication, (i) frenzied, (j) innumerable, (k) drawn all the others.’ (Foucault 1974, xvi) The use of the al- with a very fine camelhair brush, (l) et cetera, phabetical symbols suggests that relationships exist or (m) having just broken the water pitcher, (n) should exist between the categories thus linked, be- that from a long way off look like flies.’ In the cause of the conventions of the Arabic alphabet, but Knowl. Org. 28(2001)No.4 181 P. Rafferty: The Representation of Knowledge in Library Classification Schemes in relation to our system of thought, that does not fication system developed into a tool consisting of a appear to be happening. For Foucault the other ‘mon- system of classes, made up of Main Classes, each of strous quality’ running through Borges’ taxonomy is which was divided into increasingly specialised sub- the fact that these categories could only exist in and classes; a series of symbols, called notation, which op- through language. They could not be juxtaposed in erate as signs signifying the classes; and an index any other sense, in any other place, in any material which links subject terms and the notational signs. site. Borges’ monstrous encyclopaedic classification is The classification notation in effect becomes a sym- an important starting point for Foucault in his inves- bolic language built on what Ranganathan terms tigations into the historical contingency of discourses ‘natural language’. Method, order and objectivity, of order, power and control. Foucault’s investigations which carry with them the connotations of ‘science’, of the operations of power through localised institu- are achieved in the general library classification tions and practices are the starting point of this paper scheme through the rational structures and conven- which explores the order and juxtaposition of ideal tions of Main Classes which assert forms of logical concepts through the discursive practice of classifica- taxonomy, and through the artificially constructed tion schemes. symbols which bear with them connotations of alge- The philosophy of librarianship might be charac- braic languages. These taxonomies are the product of terised as positivist, embracing science and research, rational, and often pragmatic and functionalist, and modern, rooted in an optimistic interpretation of worldviews. science and society. In the early days of the profes- Berwick Sayers whose highly influential ‘Manual of sion, librarians tended to take the view that progress Library Classification’ was first published in 1926 ar- would be inevitable if knowledge is made accessible. gued that the arrangement of books by men [sic] was During this period knowledge organisation solutions ‘merely a part of the divine instinct that ‘order is took the form of large-scale library classification sys- Heaven’s first law’; for arrangement, or classification tems which were described as general, or in the case of as we call it, lies at the base of every well-managed life UDC, universal. These classification schemes were and occupation.’ (Berwick-Sayers 1955,1) For Berwick constructed within a philosophical framework which Sayers the process of classification is natural, but that viewed man as the central focus in the universe, natural operation is the function of a divine interven- which believed in progress through science and re- tion. Men [sic] are thus defined in relation to an as- search, and which privileged written documentation sumed god. Unsurprisingly, given the interest in edu- over other forms. cation, the explosion of knowledge, and the modern Librarians have traditionally combined high pur- faith in science and method, the late 19th and early 20th pose and idealist aspirations with pragmatic practical centuries was a particularly fertile time in the history solutions. Their creative genius embodied in library of general classification systems. During this time classification schemes attempts at one and the same Melvil Dewey produced the Dewey Decimal Classifi- time to map knowledge, to represent ‘the order of cation scheme which was first published 1876 and is things’ in relation to the ideal, and to organise the ma- probably still the world’s best known scheme; Otlet terial – books on shelves – within the everyday con- and La Fontaine’s International Institute of Bibliogra- fines of the library building. phy was set up in 1895; Henry Evelyn Bliss’s Biblio- graphic Classification was published between 1940 and 1953; and perhaps the most intriguing of all the The General Classification Schemes general schemes, S.R. Ranganathan’s Colon Classifica- tion was published in 1933. General classification schemes for libraries are con- The creators of these systems had in common a de- cerned with mapping knowledge so that subjects are sire to facilitate access to knowledge in books and a differentiated from each other and the relationships belief in the value of science, organisation and between subjects are spatially represented. Classifica- method. They often emphasised the practical purpose tion theorists believe that there is some sort of ‘order of their classification schemes. In the introduction to of things’ and that the order, which relates to the ab- the 1961 abridged English edition of UDC, the editors stract world of ideas, can be made material in the claimed that the UDC should ‘not be regarded as a form of highly conventionalised, symbolically anno- philosophical classification of knowledge, nor is the tated classification schemes. The general library classi- order of subjects of primary importance.’ (BS 1000A 182 Knowl. Org. 28(2001)No.4 P. Rafferty: The Representation of Knowledge in Library Classification Schemes 1961, 6) But UDC was built on a system of knowl- language’, that is socialised language developed in edge: UDC main class order was built on top of the and through communities of speakers, as unscien- order of main classes developed by Melvil Dewey tific and imprecise. which in turn was based on Francis Bacon’s rationalist representation of orders of knowledge. Commenta- tors on classification theory have tended to adopt Main Classes and Disciplining Epistemology fairly ambivalent views about the relationship be- tween library classification and philosophical systems Although in his Canons of Classification (Berwick of knowledge. Berwick Sayers argued that classifica- Sayers 1955,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategies for Collecting Electronic Resources on the Qur’Anic Researches
    International Journal on Quranic Research (IJQR) © 2013 Centre of Quranic Research Vol.3, No. 4, June 2013, Pp. 57-78 (CQR), University of Malaya, Malaysia STRATEGIES FOR COLLECTING ELECTRONIC RESOURCES ON THE QUR’ANIC RESEARCHES Amar Arbaoui, Yasser M. Alginahi & Mohamed Menacer ABSTRACT Electronic dissemination of digital information has benefited from recent advancements in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and dissemination of Islamic digital content in different formats has taken advantage of this rapid progress in technology. Information is available in many formats and on many different applications and devices. However, the online availability of such resources on Qur’an and its sciences is very limited. In this work, digital Qur’an resources available from authentic sources will be used to formulate strategies on how to extract, format, present and make these resources available for researchers in a centralized knowledgebase. The methodology starts with collecting these authentic electronic Islamic resources. Next, resources are classified into their main categories, sub-categories and related categories. Then, the list of metadata for each type of resource is developed. Following this, strategies for efficient dissemination for the different types of digital resources are developed; depending on the format of the files, the metadata is extracted automatically, if possible, otherwise data is entered manually into the knowledgebase. Therefore, the manual entry of data into the knowledgebase for resources having poor or lacking metadata would efficiently help researchers to easily locate the resources they are searching for. Developing these strategies for each type of format could efficiently help in the search process. From the data collected so far, the amount of data gathered shows that books contribute to the highest number of resources available in this area followed by post graduate dissertations, conference papers and journal papers respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Practice. Drexel Univ., Philadelphia, Pa. Graduate
    DOCUMENT RESUME F 680 IR 002 925 AUTHOR Painter, Ann F., Ed. TITLE Classification: Theory and Practice. INSTITUTION Drexel Univ., Philadelphia, Pa. Graduate Schoolof Library Science. PUB DATE Oct 74 NOTE 125p. JOURNAL CIT Drexel Library Quarterly; v10 n4 Oct 74 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$5.70 Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS *Classification; Cluster Grouping; Futures (of Society); Information Retrieval; *Library Automation; *Library Science; Library Technical Processes IDENTIFIERS Dewey Decimal Classification; Library of Congress Classification; Universal Decimal Classification ABSTRACT In response to recent trends towards automated bibliographic control, this issue of "Drexel LibraryQuarterly" discusses present day bibliographic classificationschemes and offers some insight into the future. Thisvolume contains essays which: (1) define "classification";(2) provide historical ,background; (3) examine the Dewey Decimal System, the Library of Congress Classification, and the Universal Decimal Classification;(4) discuss research and development of automated systems; and(5) make predictions for the future. (EMH) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include manyinformal unpublished * materials not available from other sources.ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available.Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encounteredand this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopyreproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document ReproductionService
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Decimal Classification and Colon Classification: Their Mutual Impact
    Annals of Library and Information Studies Vol. 62, December 2015, pp. 226-230 Universal Decimal Classification and Colon Classification: Their mutual impact Amitabha Chatterjee Retired Professor & Head, Department of Library & Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, Email: [email protected] Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), being a predecessor of Colon Classification (CC), had impacts on CC in various ways – directly as well as indirectly. But surprisingly CC too made an impact on UDC in various ways during its revision process. The paper discusses how these two classification schemes have influenced each other in different spheres. Keywords: Universal Decimal Classification; Colon Classification; Faceted Classification; Generalia Class; Indicator digit; Notation; Common isolate; Phase relation; Agglomerate Introduction Ranganathan, however, made continuous efforts over Ranganathan traced the development of several decades to remove rigidities of different kinds bibliographic classification schemes in three that the scheme was suffering from and finally it major periods, viz., Pre-Facet Period (1876-1896), became a freely faceted classification scheme. Transition-to-Facet Period (1897-1932) and Facet Evidently, UDC being a predecessor of CC, had Period (1933-1975). The main achievements of the impacts on CC – both directly as well as indirectly. Transition-to-Facet Period, according to him were: But surprisingly, CC too made an impact on UDC in (1) Venture into the work of arranging in a helpful various ways during its revision process. Mcllwaine sequence the main entries in periodicals – micro has observed that “the scheme (i.e. UDC) exerted a documents embodying micro thought as we call strong influence ….. upon the Colon Classification” them; and that “for some years Ranganathan worked on the (2) Venture into pulling out of some of the subjects UDC while he was living in Switzerland after the certain facets such as Time Facet and Space Second World War, so it was a two-way process”2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colon Classification: a Few Considerations on Its Future
    Annals of Library and Information Studies Vol. 62, December 2015, pp. 231-238 The Colon Classification: A few considerations on its future K. S. Raghavan Visiting Scientist, Centre for Knowledge Analytics & Ontological Engineering (KAnOE), PES University, Bangalore, and Member-Secretary, Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, E-mail: [email protected] The article highlights the efforts and plans of Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science for revival of CC. Presents a brief history of the Scheme and explains is features. Discusses areas needing revamping for continual revision and existence of CC. Also seeks feedback from LIS professionals on the revision of the Scheme. Keywords: Colon Classification; Isolate ideas Introduction Prolegomena was published in 1957 which was hailed Among the several seminal contributions of by Berwick Sayers as the “most precise, theoretical, Dr. S. R. Ranganathan, Colon Classification , first practical and comparative exposition of classification published in 1933, and the Prolegomena stand out. theory …. intensely original”. 1 A third edition of The origins of the Colon Classification scheme lay in Prolegomena has also been published. The Ranganathan’s dissatisfaction with the library development of CC has been based on the theory classification schemes of the times when he was a expounded in the Prolegomena . student at the University of London. Ranganathan found that the structure of Dewey Decimal Editions of CC Classification was not flexible enough for expansion During the life time of Ranganathan, CC saw six and for accommodating new developments in the editions, a rate of revision matched by no other universe of ideas / subjects. He hit upon the idea of general classification scheme except Dewey Decimal structuring subjects ‘bottom-up ’ within each Basic Classification (DDC).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This
    Transinformação ISSN: 2318-0889 Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas FERREIRA, Ana Carolina; MACULAN, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos; NAVES, Madalena Martins Lopes Ranganathan and the faceted classification theory1 Transinformação, vol. 29, no. 3, 2017, September-December, pp. 279-295 Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas DOI: 10.1590/2318-08892017000300006 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=384357586006 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative ORIGINAL 279 Ranganathan and the faceted classification theory1 THEORY CLASSIFICATION THE FACETED AND RANGANATHAN ORIGINAL Ranganathan e a teoria da classificação facetada Ana Carolina FERREIRA2 Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos MACULAN2 Madalena Martins Lopes NAVES3 Abstract The present study contextualizes Ranganathan’s main theoretical contributions to the classification theory and addresses the Five Laws of Library Science. The major milestones in philosophical and bibliographic classifications are presented to show that the classification system has evolved from purely philosophical schemes, which were focused on the systematization of knowledge, into modern bibliographic classification systems. Facet analysis is considered a contribution to the classification process since it allows the use of an approach that encompasses different points of view of the same subject, as opposed to the enumerative systems. This article also discusses Ranganathan’s five fundamental categories, known as Personality, Matter, Energy, Space and Time, and points out to criticism of this form of categorization in the literature. The Spiral of Scientific Method and the Spiral Model of Development of subjects are presented; the latter is the meta-model of the former.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Subject Access in National Bibliographies Draft 2011, May
    IFLA CLASS Guidelines for Subject Access in National Bibliographies Draft 2011, May Guidelines for Subject Access in National Bibliographies IFLA Working Group on Guidelines for Subject Access by National Bibliographic Agencies Draft May 2011 for Worldwide Review 1 IFLA CLASS Guidelines for Subject Access in National Bibliographies Draft 2011, May Contents Preface 1. Introduction 1.1 Subject access in national bibliographies 1.2 IFLA’s Working Group on Guidelines for Subject Access by National Bibliographic Agencies 1.3 Outline of the Guidelines 2. Users of national bibliographies and subject access 2.1 Users of national bibliographies 2.2 Use of subject access in national bibliographies 2.3 Outcome of this review 3. Subject access standards and tools 3.1 Controlled and natural language indexing 3.2 Features of controlled indexing languages 3.3 Importance of standard indexing tools 3.4 Verbal indexing schemes 3.4.1 Subject heading lists 3.4.2 Thesauri 3.4.3 Pre-coordination and post-coordination 3.5 Classification schemes 3.5.1 Dewey Decimal Classification 3.5.2 Universal Decimal Classification 3.5.3 Library of Congress Classification 3.6 Automatic indexing 3.7 Other subject access tools 4. Functionality and interface of national bibliographies 4.1 Presentation of national bibliographies 4.2 General recommendations 4.3 Recommendations for online catalogue functionalities 4.4 Recommendations for online catalogue interfaces 4.5 Recommendations for query 4.6 Recommendations for other features 5. Application scenarios (indexing / access levels) 5.1 Different levels of subject access 5.2 Criteria to decide subject access levels 5.2.1 Characteristics of materials 5.2.2 Users 5.2.3 Other considerations 5.3 Decision matrix 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Schedule Practiced in DDC 22Nd and CC 6Th Revised Ed.: a Comparative Study
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln Spring 3-2021 Literature Schedule Practiced in DDC 22nd and CC 6th Revised ed.: A Comparative Study BINAY KRISHNA DAS Library Trainee Indian Institute of Technology - Guwahati, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons DAS, BINAY KRISHNA Library Trainee, "Literature Schedule Practiced in DDC 22nd and CC 6th Revised ed.: A Comparative Study" (2021). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 5360. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5360 1 ABSTRACT Classification in a library arranges the documents in classes based on mutual relationship between them and brings the like classes together and separates them from the unlike classes. It predominantly acts as the backbone of the library services provided in a library. In this study an attempt has been made to make an extensive study on how literature schedule is treated i.e. how class number building approach is carried out with the help of certain selected titles. An attempt has been made to delineate and outline how the literature schedule is practiced in different ways in both the classification scheme. By assigning class numbers according to both the schemes to the titles belonging to literature schedule it has been tried to outline the nature of treating the literature schedule. In order to get an insight of both the classification scheme the study is carried out. Keywords: Classification, DDC, CC, Library Classification, Class Number 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Five Laws of Library Science on Dr. S. R. Ranganathan's Colon Classification: an Explorative Study*
    Implications of Five Laws of Library Science on Dr. S. R. Ranganathan’s Colon Classification: An Explorative Study* Dr. S. K. Asok Kumar** Prof. B. Ramesh Babu*** Dr. P. Nageswara Rao**** Contents 1. Introduction 5. Impressions on Colon Classification from 2. Overview of Different Editions of Colon the LIS Professionals Classification (CC) 6. Colon Classification during Post - 3. Implication of Five Laws of Library Ranganathan Period Science on Colon Classification 7. Relevance of Colon Classification in the 4. Design of Depth Schedules based on contemporary world of Librarianship Colon Classification 6th edition 8. Concluding Remarks ABSTRACT There have been several milestones in the history of library classification but most of the schemes failed to meet the new challenges in the organisation of information. Dr. S. R. Ranganathan tried to revolutionise the whole thinking on classificatory approach, when he devised the Colon Classification (CC) in 1933. He developed the Colon Classification scheme with a sound theoretical background based on normative principles, Five laws of Library science, canons, etc. One important feature of CC is that, its use is not confined to information storage and retrieval alone. This paper presents an over view of different editions of the CC highlighting the salient features of the editions. Further the implication of Five Laws of Library Science has been described. The authors stressed that the features of such as greater hospitality, specificity and mixed notation has paved the way to design and develop the depth schedules on various micro level subjects and so far about 130 micro schedules have been published. The impressions by the leading LIS professionals during and after Ranganathan’s time have been highlighted.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Model for Libraries in the Digital Environment
    487 Classification Model for Libraries in the Digital Environment K S Chudamani Abstract There is lot of research carried out about the models of classification suitable for libraries in digital environment. UDC, CC, DDC, LCC are used in libraries all over the world. People are using existing Classification models and automating them for use in the digital environment. Though this is a right step, one has to look at the operational requirements of the digital environment. Keeping this fact in view, this paper analyses the requirements of the digital environment and points out the adaptations required for the traditional schemes to suit the digital environment . Keywords : Classification, Classification Models 0. Introduction Various classification models are used in the organization of knowledge in libraries. The well-known among them are 1. Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) 2. Universal Decimal Classification(UDC) 3. Colon Classification (CC) Each of these has certain common characteristics and distinct characteristics. They were adopted by different libraries for serving a variety of purposes like classifying books, articles and technical reports, for providing shelf access, etc. This paper explores the modifications required to these models to augment information retrieval in the digital environment 1. Classification Models DDC is enumerative and can be easily memorized. The notation is usually brief. Though it has few analytico - synthetic features, they are very limited and as such produces brief notation. This helps user to memorize the number easily. Also, its updated editions are produced regularly and hence it is possible to update the organization of documents without much effort from the classifier. Though its notation is mixed, most part of it is purely numerical.
    [Show full text]
  • Colon Classification: a Requiem
    DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, Vol. 33, No. 4, July 2013, pp. 265-276 2013, DESIDOC Colon Classification: A Requiem M.P. Satija* and Jagtar Singh** *Dept. of Library & Information Science, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar-143 005 E-mail: [email protected] **Dept. of Library & Information Science, Punjabi University, Patiala-147 002 E-mail: [email protected] AbstRACt This paper lists important publications on classification by S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972), veritably called the father of Indian library movement. It outlines brief history of the seven editions of his revolutionary colon classification (CC) from 1928 to 1987. Seven editions are grouped into three evolutionary versions. It states the unique features of the CC as based on his deep study of the nature and growth of knowledge, and explains the work of designing a classification system into three successive but demarcated planes of work, namely, idea, verbal, and notional planes. Tools for designing and evaluating a system are enshrined in his 55 canons, 22 principles, 13 postulates and 10 devices. Further, this paper discusses the division and mapping of knowledge, types of subjects, and modes of their formation in the universe of knowledge as envisaged by Ranganathan. Semantic and syntactic relations are enshrined in his PMEST facet formula fitted with rounds and levels of facets, and other principles, such as the famous Wall-Picture principle, for citation order of facets. It also briefly explains facet analysis and number building with its notational base of 74 digits, and concludes with extent of its use and its enduring contribution to the science of classification and its future.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Colon Classification (Such As Thesaurofacet, Classaurus) As Well As Subject Indexing Systems Such a Chain Indexing, PRECIS, POPS!
    pounded by Ranganathan has become synonymous with the general theory of classification as it was resolved at Dorking in 1957, about three decades ago. Enumerative Mohinder Partap Satija classifications have become shibboleths of an outdated Guru Nanak nev University, Amritsar, India past. It seems now quite certain that the bibliographic schemes of the future will be analytico-synthetic in method. Also, from the theory of CC, subject indexing languages have emerged in the fonn of faceted thesauri Use of Colon Classification (such as Thesaurofacet, Classaurus) as well as subject indexing systems such a Chain Indexing, PRECIS, POPS!. Thus Ranganathan's methods play a crucial role today in the organization of knowledge and consequently Satija, M.P.: Use ol eolon Classification. in its effective retrieval and usage. Int. Classif. 13 (1986) No. 2, p. 88-92, 25 refs. The rudiments of the scheme are taught in most Investigations on the use of the Colon Classification (ee) have not as yet been undertaken in a systematic way. In the article library schools the world over. In the U.S. where classi­ statistics on the use of the CC are given, based on some direc­ fication theory as a discipline of study, has always tories as weU as other studies in a limited area (New Delhi and remained at a low ebb, Alan R. Thomas discovered that Rajasthan), The numbers obtained indicate that apparently the use of CC in India has been overestimated so far in the literature. the CC is taught in 52% of the accredited schools there It is suggested to include information on the classification (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Elel\IENTS LIBRARY CLASSIFICATION
    KAIKHUSHRU TARAPOREVALA MEMORIAL SERIES IN LIBRARY SCIENCE No.4 ELEl\IENTS of LIBRARY CLASSIFICATION Based on Lectures delivered at the University of Bombay in December 1944 I!Y S. R. RANGANATHAN, M.A., L.T., F.L.A. Librarian, Hindu, University .Library. Benarea. Sec..,tary. Madras Library Association, P..,sident. Indian Library Association 1945 POO~A N. K. PUBLISHI~G HOUSE KAIKHUSHRU TARAPOREVALA MEMORIAL SERIES IN LIBRARY SCIENCE No.4 ELEl\IENTS of LIBRARY CLASSIFICATION Based on Lectures delivered at the University of Bombay in December 1944 I!Y S. R. RANGANATHAN, M.A., L.T., F.L.A. Librarian, Hindu, University .Library. Benarea. Secr<:tary. Madras Library Association, P~sident. Indian Library Association 1945 POO~A N. K. PUBLISHI~G HOUSE Colon Number 251 H5 Decimal Number 025·4 Ran KAIKHUSHRU TARAPOREVALA MEMORIAL SERIES IN LIBRARY SCil::NCE · EDITED BY :P. l\1. JOSHI. M.A., Ph.D., (London), Librarian, Bombay University Library. Vice-President. Indian Library Association. Member of the Imperial Library Council. Calcutta. As General Editor of this Series I must thank mv friend 1\ir. Phiroz Taraporevala for his help in making it possible. His brother the late Kaikhushru was keenly interested in a series of books in Librarianship and it is a fitting tribute to his memory that the present series 1s named after him. P. :\1. Josm. Pritated b1 :-5. R. Sarde•ai, B.A., LL.B., ~avin Samarth Vidvala,.a'• '5amartb Bharac Preu', 41 Budh.,...ar, Poona 2. Publisla~d by :-S. V. Damle, B. Com., ~. K.. Publi~hing House, l'oona 2.
    [Show full text]