Features, Functions and Components of a Library Classification System in the LIS Tradition for the E-Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Features, Functions and Components of a Library Classification System in the LIS Tradition for the E-Environment Review Paper JISTaP http://www.jistap.org J. of infosci. theory and practice 3(4): 62-77, 2015 Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2015.3.4.5 Features, Functions and Components of a Library Classification System in the LIS tradition for the e-Environment M P Satija Daniel Martínez-Ávila * Guru Nanak Dev University São Paulo State University Amritsar—143005 India Hygino Muzzi Filho 737 17525-900 Marilia, Brazil Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper describes qualities of a library classification system that are commonly discussed in the LIS tradition and literature, and explains such a system’s three main functions, namely knowledge mapping, information retrieval, and shelf arrangement. In this vein, the paper states the functional requirements of bibliographic classifications, which broadly are subject collocation and facilitation of browsing the collection. It explains with details the com- ponents of a library classification system and their functions. The major components are schedules, notations, and index. It also states their distinguished features, such as generalia class, form divisions, book numbers, and devices for number synthesis which are not required in a knowledge classification. It illustrates with examples from the WebDewey good examples of added features of an online library classification system. It emphasizes that institu- tional backup and a revision machinery are essential for a classification to survive and remain relevant in the print and e-environment. Keywords: Book numbers, Classification, Classification policy, Knowledge classification, Library classification, Online classification, WebDewey Open Access Accepted date: October 29, 2015 All JISTaP content is Open Access, meaning it is accessible online Received date: April 27, 2015 to everyone, without fee and authors’ permission. All JISTaP content is published and distributed under the terms of the *Corresponding Author: Daniel Martínez-Ávila Creative Commons Attribution License (http:/ creativecommons. Assistant Professor org/licenses/by/3.0/). Under this license, authors reserve the São Paulo State University copyright for their content; however, they permit anyone to Hygino Muzzi Filho 737 17525-900 Marilia, Brazil unrestrictedly use, distribute, and reproduce the content in any Email: [email protected] medium as far as the original authors and source are cited. For any reuse, redistribution, or reproduction of a work, users must clarify the license terms under which the work was produced. ⓒ ‌M P Satija, Daniel Martínez-Ávila, 2015 62 Features, Functions and Components of a Library Classification System 1. PREFACE catalogs and other information retrieval tools such as bibliographies. A modern library classification is more Categorization and classification are methods used than knowledge classification, and beyond grouping by humans to organize entities, thoughts, objects, and it has many intellectual and mechanical functions to phenomena. These processes are related to the organi- perform. Since their modern origin in the 1870s, many zation of knowledge and the way people learn, remem- library classification systems have been designed to ber, and know about the world. There is a basic human organize and access knowledge in libraries. drive to categorize as it allows people to make useful assumptions about new things by making compari- 2.1. General and Special Classifications sons with well-known things. In common language, A library classification may be general or special in the terms classification and categorization are not coverage of subject areas. A general classification cov- clearly distinguished, as for instance, dictionaries use ers all subjects in the universe of knowledge. A special both terms indistinctly. However, in Library and Infor- classification concentrates on a narrower range of top- mation Science (LIS) some make the distinction (e.g. ics, or the goods manufactured or services provided by Taylor & Joudrey, 2009, p. 376): “Categorization can the organization for which the classification has been be seen as amorphous or less well-defined grouping; developed. A special classification also refers to a clas- whereas classification can be viewed as a comprehen- sification of documents by form such as government sive hierarchical structure for organizing information reports, fiction, maps, or music. Such a classification is resources on linear shelves.” In this context, classifica- for micro-documents and in-depth subjects. tions or modern bibliographic classifications emerged The taxonomy of the different types of classification in the late 1800s and early 1900s to handle early stages has been expanded and systematized by Koch et al. of the print revolution, i.e., to organize, store, and (1997) as follows: universal schemes, national general retrieve bibliographic materials. In light of the prolif- schemes, subject specific schemes, and home-grown eration and use of simple categorization systems and schemes. Universal schemes are intended to classify classifications in physical and electronic environments, the entire universe of human knowledge for use by such as the use of BISAC (Book Industry Standards anyone, anywhere. Examples are the Universal Dec- and Communications) and other verbal categories in imal Classification (UDC), the Colon Classification libraries and websites such as Amazon and Google (CC), the Bliss bibliographic classification (BC), the Books, we are reviewing and systematizing the fea- Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), and the Library tures, functions, and components of library classifica- of Congress Classification (LCC). National general tion systems, according to the LIS literature and tra- schemes are universal in subject coverage, but intend- dition of authors such as Ranganathan, that should be ed for use in a single country. Examples are the Ned- considered or at least known in the design and choice erlandse Basisclassificatie (BC), the Sveriges Allmáma of classifications for these new environments. Biblioteksfórening (SAB), and the Nippon Dewey. This category may also include translated versions of the DDC in various languages incorporating provisions 2. LIBRARY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS for the classification of local material. Subject specific schemes are designed for use by a particular subject A classification is a tool for the organization of the community or domain. Examples are the National phenomena of the universe or any of its parts or con- Library of Medicine (NLM) scheme for medicine, stituents. It groups objects into categories/classes based Iconclass for art resources, Moy’s Law Classification, on shared properties with the purpose of bringing like and the London Education Classification, among items together. A modern library classification is a many others. Home-grown schemes are those devised classification of knowledge as it is contained in docu- for use in a particular service or retrieval system or ments of all sorts. It came into being for the purpose in a library. Examples are Yahoo!’s categories and of arranging and retrieving information resources. reader-interest classifications. There is an abundance In libraries, later, it was used for arranging classified of homemade library classifications, but these do not 63 http://www.jistap.org JISTaP Vol.3 No.4, 62-77 survive long in the era of standardized systems. scientifically sound systems, arguably more complex On the other hand, although the idea of special or and grounded than the previous three (see for instance subject specific classifications presupposes a greater Ranganathan, 1967). However, they have not been im- level of detail, some general classifications, notably plemented and used as widely as the DDC and UDC the UDC, LCC, and BC-2 (Bliss bibliographic clas- due to lack of editorial support or a more aggressive sification, second edition) have been developed in marketing of institutions such as OCLC (Online Com- sufficient depth of details to enable them to be adapted puter Library Center). The BSO and ICC are not shelf to moderately special collections. Thus, the debate be- classifications, whereas the fate of the Russian BBK is tween special and general classification is inconclusive. not known. The rest, namely EC, SC, BC, and RIC, are Ranganathan visualized his Colon Classification as a now only of historical interest. trunk of an elephant: nimble enough to pick up a small Over the years, the features of these classifications twig and strong enough to carry a heavy log of wood have evolved and with experience been standardized. (Ranganathan, 1964). The Library of Congress Classi- A library classification is a system having mutually fication, with its 21 main classes in 29 parts bound in related components or subsystems with the objective 50 volumes, is de facto a confederate of special classifi- of organizing knowledge in libraries. It has its anato- cations. The UDC, in its (now ceased) full edition, was my (hardware) showing its visible and invisible com- issued in series of fascicules suitable for information ponents, each of which has its supporting functions centers and special collections. (physiology). Some of the main general classification systems are: • ‌Dewey Decimal Classification (1876+) / by Melvil 2.2. Functional Requirements of Dewey Bibliographic Classifications • ‌Universal Decimal Classification (1905+) / FID It has been claimed that modern bibliographical (International Federation
Recommended publications
  • Library N Info SCI Ebooks
    Library & Information Science Ebooks List S.No ISBN Title Author URL Planning Academic 1 9780081021712 Bailin, Kylie https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081021712 Library Orientations Libraries and Key 2 9780081002278 Appleton, Leo https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081002278 Performance Indicators Teaching Information Lokse, 3 9780081009215 Literacy in Higher https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081009215 Mariann Education The 21st Century 4 9780081018668 Bolin, Mary https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081018668 Academic Library Cybermetric Techniques Orduna- to Evaluate 5 9780081018774 Malea, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081018774 Organizations Using Web- Enrique Based Data International Bordonaro, 6 9780081018965 Librarianship at Home https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081018965 Karen and Abroad Johanssen, 7 9780081019238 Staff-Less Libraries https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081019238 Carl Gustav Resources Anytime, 8 9780081019894 Litsey, Ryan https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081019894 Anywhere Digital Disruption and 9 9780081020456 Electronic Resource Patra, Nihar https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081020456 Management in Libraries The Role of Information Tarango, 10 9780128112229 Professionals in the https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780128112229 Javier Knowledge Economy 11 9780081001424 The End of Wisdom? Evans, Wendy https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081001424 Frederiksen, 12 9780081001721 The
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Collecting Electronic Resources on the Qur’Anic Researches
    International Journal on Quranic Research (IJQR) © 2013 Centre of Quranic Research Vol.3, No. 4, June 2013, Pp. 57-78 (CQR), University of Malaya, Malaysia STRATEGIES FOR COLLECTING ELECTRONIC RESOURCES ON THE QUR’ANIC RESEARCHES Amar Arbaoui, Yasser M. Alginahi & Mohamed Menacer ABSTRACT Electronic dissemination of digital information has benefited from recent advancements in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and dissemination of Islamic digital content in different formats has taken advantage of this rapid progress in technology. Information is available in many formats and on many different applications and devices. However, the online availability of such resources on Qur’an and its sciences is very limited. In this work, digital Qur’an resources available from authentic sources will be used to formulate strategies on how to extract, format, present and make these resources available for researchers in a centralized knowledgebase. The methodology starts with collecting these authentic electronic Islamic resources. Next, resources are classified into their main categories, sub-categories and related categories. Then, the list of metadata for each type of resource is developed. Following this, strategies for efficient dissemination for the different types of digital resources are developed; depending on the format of the files, the metadata is extracted automatically, if possible, otherwise data is entered manually into the knowledgebase. Therefore, the manual entry of data into the knowledgebase for resources having poor or lacking metadata would efficiently help researchers to easily locate the resources they are searching for. Developing these strategies for each type of format could efficiently help in the search process. From the data collected so far, the amount of data gathered shows that books contribute to the highest number of resources available in this area followed by post graduate dissertations, conference papers and journal papers respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Tara Wink. Archival Collection Development Policies: a Study of Their Content and Collaborative Aims
    Tara Wink. Archival Collection Development Policies: A Study of their Content and Collaborative Aims. A Master's paper for the M.S. in L.S. degree. April, 2010. 58 pages. Advisor: Christopher Lee Collection development is an important aspect of archival theory and work; however, few studies have looked at collection development in practice. It has also been suggested that collection development policies and plans can help to limit competition by including discussions of collaborative agreements. This paper describes a study of online archival collection development policies to determine what these documents contain and whether or not collaboration and competition are discussed. This study searched the websites of 334 repositories’ to identify online collection development policies. Available policies were then coded using the 26 elements defined in Faye Phillips’ 1984 guidelines for archival collection development policies. Available discussions of collaboration within the policies were also coded. The results suggest that repositories are using a variety of materials when writing policies and collaborative agreements in policies are the exception rather than the rule. Headings: Archives. Collection development (Libraries) – Policy statements. Archives – United States. Appraisal of archival materials. Special libraries – Collection development Archival Collection Development Policies: A Study of their Content and Collaborative Aims by Tara Wink A Master's paper submitted to the faculty of the School of Information and Library Science of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Library Science. Chapel Hill, North Carolina April, 2010 Approved by: ___________________________ Advisor 1 Introduction Collection development is a concept established in the library world and adopted into the archival profession.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue and Index
    ISSN 2399-9667 Catalogue and Index Periodical of the Cataloguing and Indexing Group, a Special Interest Group of CILIP, the Library and Information Association Editorial September 2017, Issue 188 Contents 3-10 Deborah Lee & Classification is the theme of this bumper issue of Catalogue and Index. Anastasia Kerameos There was a tremendous response to the call for papers, illustrating the importance and interest in classification to the U.K. cataloguing and 11-16 John Akeroyd & metadata community. The classification discussed in this issue comes in many flavours, including the usage of classification schemes, digital tools Aida Slavic for classification, the theory of classification, reclassification, and much 17-20 Vanda Broughton more besides. 21-26 Sean Goddard & The issue starts by exploring the usage of classification schemes. Deborah Lee and Anastasia Kerameos outline the results of a survey Tim Haillay into U.K. classification practices, linked to the recent CILIP CIG workshop “Thinking about classification”. John Ackeroyd and Aida Slavic 27-29 Jane Del-Pizzo discuss how UDC is used, including survey results relating to the U.K. 30-33 Marcin Trzmielewski, and the use of UDC in repositories and as part of catalogue records. Vanda Broughton discusses classification theory and how classification Claudio Gnoli, Marco (and classification schemes) are still a critical part of organizing Lardera, Gaia Heidi information. Pallestrini & Matea Sipic Reclassification is another significant part of cataloguing and 34-37 Nicky Ransom classification life, and this issue is a rich source of information about 38-42 Penny Doulgeris various reclassification projects. Sean Goddard and Tim Haillay describe a reclassification project at the University of Sussex, specifically 43-45 Mary Mitchell focussed on language and literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Positioning Library and Information Science Graduate Programs for 21St Century Practice
    Positioning Library and Information Science Graduate Programs for 21st Century Practice Forum Report November 2017, Columbia, SC Compiled and edited by: Ashley E. Sands, Sandra Toro, Teri DeVoe, and Sarah Fuller (Institute of Museum and Library Services), with Christine Wolff-Eisenberg (Ithaka S+R) Suggested citation: Sands, A.E., Toro, S., DeVoe, T., Fuller, S., and Wolff-Eisenberg, C. (2018). Positioning Library and Information Science Graduate Programs for 21st Century Practice. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Museum and Library Services. Institute of Museum and Library Services 955 L’Enfant Plaza North, SW Suite 4000 Washington, DC 20024 June 2018 This publication is available online at www.imls.gov Positioning Library and Information Science Graduate Programs for 21st Century Practice | Forum Report II Table of Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Panels & Discussion ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Session I: Diversity in the Library Profession ....................................................................................... 3 Defining metrics and gathering data ............................................................................................... 4 Building professional networks through cohorts ........................................................................ 4
    [Show full text]
  • Archival Reference and Access: Syllabi and a Snapshot of the Archival Canon Ciaran B
    This article was downloaded by: [Ciaran B. Trace] On: 25 November 2012, At: 09:30 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Reference Librarian Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wref20 Archival Reference and Access: Syllabi and a Snapshot of the Archival Canon Ciaran B. Trace a & Carlos J. Ovalle a a School of Information, The University of Texas, Austin, TX To cite this article: Ciaran B. Trace & Carlos J. Ovalle (2012): Archival Reference and Access: Syllabi and a Snapshot of the Archival Canon, The Reference Librarian, 53:1, 76-94 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2011.596364 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • ARL Cataloger Librarian Roles and Responsibilities Now and in the Future Jeanne M
    Collections and Technical Services Publications and Collections and Technical Services Papers 2014 ARL Cataloger Librarian Roles and Responsibilities Now and In the Future Jeanne M. K. Boydston Iowa State University, [email protected] Joan M. Leysen Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/libcat_pubs Part of the Cataloging and Metadata Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ libcat_pubs/59. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Collections and Technical Services at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Collections and Technical Services Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARL Cataloger Librarian Roles and Responsibilities Now and In the Future Abstract This article details the results of a 2011 study of cataloger librarians’ changing roles and responsibilities at academic Association of Research Libraries. The tudys participants, cataloging department heads, report that cataloger librarian roles are expanding to include cataloging more electronic resources and local hidden collections in addition to print materials. They ra e also creating non-MARC metadata. The increased usage of vendor products and services is also affecting the roles of cataloger librarians at some institutions. The ra ticle explores what skills cataloger librarians will need in the future and how libraries are providing training for that future.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Practice. Drexel Univ., Philadelphia, Pa. Graduate
    DOCUMENT RESUME F 680 IR 002 925 AUTHOR Painter, Ann F., Ed. TITLE Classification: Theory and Practice. INSTITUTION Drexel Univ., Philadelphia, Pa. Graduate Schoolof Library Science. PUB DATE Oct 74 NOTE 125p. JOURNAL CIT Drexel Library Quarterly; v10 n4 Oct 74 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$5.70 Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS *Classification; Cluster Grouping; Futures (of Society); Information Retrieval; *Library Automation; *Library Science; Library Technical Processes IDENTIFIERS Dewey Decimal Classification; Library of Congress Classification; Universal Decimal Classification ABSTRACT In response to recent trends towards automated bibliographic control, this issue of "Drexel LibraryQuarterly" discusses present day bibliographic classificationschemes and offers some insight into the future. Thisvolume contains essays which: (1) define "classification";(2) provide historical ,background; (3) examine the Dewey Decimal System, the Library of Congress Classification, and the Universal Decimal Classification;(4) discuss research and development of automated systems; and(5) make predictions for the future. (EMH) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include manyinformal unpublished * materials not available from other sources.ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available.Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encounteredand this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopyreproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document ReproductionService
    [Show full text]
  • Library and Information and Records Management in the Development of Domestic Discipline Differentiation and Integration
    International Conference on Management, Computer and Education Informatization (MCEI 2015) Library and Information and Records Management in the Development of Domestic Discipline Differentiation and Integration Hui Wang University Library, Jilin Agricultural University, 130118 Changchun, PR China E-mail. [email protected] Abstract—Along with our country has gone to the the outcome of discipline differentiation. Library and information era, economic and comprehensive national information and records management are currently in a strength is constantly growing stronger, library and special transition period. This type of discipline information sciences and records management disciplines differentiation has become a very important part of are developing. Differentiation and integration have discipline development, which changes the basic become the ordinary state of the discipline development of composition and developmental form of the disciplines. library and information sciences and records management, where integration plays a major role. Library and A. The historical process of discipline differentiation information sciences and records management will concerning library and information sciences and continue to self-improve and develop during the course of records management the differentiation and integration, not only to promote the improvement of branch disciplines, but also to Currently we have entered a period of rapid gradually label them with characteristics of the era. development, when literature documenting and Library and information sciences and records recording is more and more. People are using more and management in our country thus can reach a new level. more literatures, which makes the use ratio of literatures greatly improved, consequently the custody and Keywords-academic development pattern; differentiation; preservation of the literatures are becoming difficult and integration; library and information sciences and records complicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering Library of Congress Classification in US Law Libraries
    LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL Vol. 106:1 [2014-5] It’s All Enumerative: Reconsidering Library of Congress Classification in U.S. Law Libraries* Kristen M. Hallows** Ms. Hallows investigates the widespread use of the Library of Congress Classification system in U.S. law libraries and the difficulties it can present in some circumstances. To address these problems, she proposes that smaller law libraries that do not par- ticipate in a bibliographic utility may benefit from an in-house classification scheme. Introduction ¶1 At its most basic level, the human impulse to classify emerges from our strong desire to know what to expect. New things that resemble familiar things need little or no further examination. Quite simply, “we know what to expect of a dog or a banana, since they are similar to dogs and bananas we already know.”1 ¶2 Classification also provides a means of organization. One of the most fun- damental concepts learned in a library and information science program is that we organize to retrieve; therefore, classification is not only helpful but also necessary if we are to benefit from the information we acquire and produce. Further, we may also classify to facilitate browsing and therefore discovery—even in an online envi- ronment such as the library catalog,2 though physical collections are the focus of this article. ¶3 In an increasingly digital world, classification may seem like a quaint notion from the past. In a database, it is unnecessary to store records using any particular system, as long as those records relevant to a search are displayed or sorted in a useful way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Classification Systems on Management and Access in Selected Elementary School Libraries" (1986)
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations in Urban Services - Urban College of Education & Professional Studies Education (Darden) Summer 1986 The ffecE ts of Classification Systems on Management and Access in Selected Elementary School Libraries Ellen L. Miller Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/ urbanservices_education_etds Recommended Citation Miller, Ellen L.. "The Effects of Classification Systems on Management and Access in Selected Elementary School Libraries" (1986). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, , Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/2ewx-2p03 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/urbanservices_education_etds/3 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Education & Professional Studies (Darden) at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations in Urban Services - Urban Education by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECTS OF CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS ON MANAGEMENT AND ACCESS IN SELECTED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LIBRARIES by Ellen L. Miller B.S. January 1973, Old Dominion University M.S. August 1976, Old Dominion University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY URBAN SERVICES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August, 1986 Executive Director ther Chairperson Concentration Director Dean of the Darde Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT THE EFFECTS OF CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS ON MANAGEMENT AND ACCESS IN SELECTED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LIBRARIES Ellen Lowe Miller Old Dominion University, 1986 Director: Dr. Katherine T. Bucher Without an adequate access and delivery system for "easy" books, young children are locked out of the vast literary resources of elementary school libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Decimal Classification and Colon Classification: Their Mutual Impact
    Annals of Library and Information Studies Vol. 62, December 2015, pp. 226-230 Universal Decimal Classification and Colon Classification: Their mutual impact Amitabha Chatterjee Retired Professor & Head, Department of Library & Information Science, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, Email: [email protected] Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), being a predecessor of Colon Classification (CC), had impacts on CC in various ways – directly as well as indirectly. But surprisingly CC too made an impact on UDC in various ways during its revision process. The paper discusses how these two classification schemes have influenced each other in different spheres. Keywords: Universal Decimal Classification; Colon Classification; Faceted Classification; Generalia Class; Indicator digit; Notation; Common isolate; Phase relation; Agglomerate Introduction Ranganathan, however, made continuous efforts over Ranganathan traced the development of several decades to remove rigidities of different kinds bibliographic classification schemes in three that the scheme was suffering from and finally it major periods, viz., Pre-Facet Period (1876-1896), became a freely faceted classification scheme. Transition-to-Facet Period (1897-1932) and Facet Evidently, UDC being a predecessor of CC, had Period (1933-1975). The main achievements of the impacts on CC – both directly as well as indirectly. Transition-to-Facet Period, according to him were: But surprisingly, CC too made an impact on UDC in (1) Venture into the work of arranging in a helpful various ways during its revision process. Mcllwaine sequence the main entries in periodicals – micro has observed that “the scheme (i.e. UDC) exerted a documents embodying micro thought as we call strong influence ….. upon the Colon Classification” them; and that “for some years Ranganathan worked on the (2) Venture into pulling out of some of the subjects UDC while he was living in Switzerland after the certain facets such as Time Facet and Space Second World War, so it was a two-way process”2.
    [Show full text]