Stability of the Logarithmic Brunn-Minkowski Inequality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stability of the Logarithmic Brunn-Minkowski Inequality Stability of the Logarithmic Brunn-Minkowski inequality in the case of many hyperplane symmetries K´aroly J. B¨or¨oczky,∗† Apratim De‡ March 11, 2021 Dedicated to Prof. Erwin Lutwak on the occasion of his seventy-fifth birthday Abstract In the case of symmetries with respect to n independent linear hyperplanes, a stability versions of the Logarithmic Brunn-Minkowski inequality and the Logarithmic Minkowski inequality for convex bodies are established. MSC 52A40 1 Introduction The classical Brunn-Minkowski inequality form the core of various areas in probability, additive combinatorics and convex geometry (see Gardner [48], Schneider [83] and Tao, Vu [85]). For recent related work in the theory of arXiv:2101.02549v3 [math.MG] 10 Mar 2021 valuations, algorithmic theory and the Gaussian setting, see say Jochemko, Sanyal [60, 61], Kane [62], Gardner, Zvavitch [49], Eskenazis, Moschidis [37]. The rapidly developing new Lp-Brunn-Minkowski theory (where p = 1 is the classical case) initiated by Lutwak [68, 69, 70], has become main ∗Supported by NKFIH grant K 132002 †Alfr´ed R´enyi Institute of Mathematics, Realtanoda u. 13-15, H-1053 Budapest, Hun- gary, and Department of Mathematics, Central European University, Nador u. 9, H-1051, Budapest, Hungary, [email protected] ‡Department of Mathematics, Central European University, Nador u. 9, H-1051, Bu- dapest, Hungary, [email protected] 1 research area in modern convex geometry and geometric analysis. Following Firey [45] and Lutwak [68, 69, 70], major results have been obtained by Hug, Lutwak, Yang, Zhang [58], and more recently the papers Kolesnikov, Milman [65], Chen, Huang, Li, Liu [26], Hosle, Kolesnikov, Livshyts [57], Kolesnikov, Livshyts [64] present new developments and approaches. We note that the Lp-Minkowski and Lp-Brunn-Minkowski inequalities are even extended to certain families of non-convex sets by Zhang [90], Ludwig, Xiao, Zhang [67] and Lutwak, Yang, Zhang [71]. We call a compact compact set K in Rn a convex body if V (K) > 0 where V (K) stands for the n-dimensional Lebesgue measure. The corner- stone of the Brunn-Minkowski Theory is the Brunn-Minkowski inequality (see Schneider [83]). If K and C are convex bodies in Rn and α,β > 0, then the Brunn-Minkowski inequality says that 1 1 1 V (αK + βC) n αV (K) n + βV (C) n (1) ≥ where equality holds if and only if C = γK + z for γ > 0 and z Rn. ∈ Because of the homogeneity of the Lebesgue measure, (1) is equivalent to say that if λ (0, 1), then ∈ 1 1 λ λ V ((1 λ)K + λβC) n V (K) − V (C) (2) − ≥ where equality holds if and only if K and C are translates. We also note another consequence of the Brunn-Minkowski inequality (1); namely, the Minkowski inequality says that hC dSK hK dSK provided V (C)= V (K). (3) n−1 ≥ n−1 ZS ZS The first stability forms of the Brunn-Minkowski inequality were due to Minkowski himself (see Groemer [52]). If the distance of K and C is measured in terms of the so-called Hausdorff distance, then Diskant [33] and Groemer [51] provided close to be optimal stability versions (see Groemer [52]). However, the natural distance is in terms volume of the symmetric difference, and the optimal result is due to Figalli, Maggi, Pratelli [41, 42]. To define the “homothetic distance” A(K,C) of convex bodies K and C, let −1 −1 α = K n and β = C n , and let | | | | A(K,C) = min αK∆(x + βC) : x Rn {| | ∈ } where K∆Q stands for the symmetric difference of K and Q. In addition, C K let σ(K,C) = max |K| , |C | . Now Figalli, Maggi, Pratelli [42] proved that | | | | n o 2 n−1 3 (2 2 n ) 2 2 setting γ∗ = ( −122n7 ) , we have 1 1 1 γ∗ n n n 2 K + C ( K + C ) 1+ 1 A(K,C) . | | ≥ | | | | " σ(K,C) n · # Here the exponent 2 of A(K,C)2 is optimal (cf. Figalli, Maggi, Pratelli [42]). We note that prior to [42], the only known error term in the Brunn- Minkowski inequality was of order A(K,C)η with η n, due to Diskant ≥ [33] and Groemer [51] in their work on providing stability result in terms of the Hausdorff distance (see also Groemer [52]), and also to a more di- rect approach by Esposito, Fusco, Trombetti [38]; therefore, the exponent depended significantly on n. We note that recently, various breakthrough stability results about ge- ometric functional inequalities have been obtained. Fusco, Maggi, Pratelli [47] proved an optimal stability version of the isoperimetric inequality (whose result was extended to the Brunn-Minkowski inequality by Figalli, Maggi, Pratelli [41, 42], see also Eldan, Klartag [36]). Stonger versions of the Borell- Brascamp-Lieb inequality are provided by Ghilli, Salani [50] and Rossi, Salani [80], and of the Sobolev inequality by Figalli, Zhang [44] (extend- ing Bianchi, Egnell [13] and Figalli, Neumayer [43]), Nguyen [75] and Wang [89], and of some related inequalities by Caglar, Werner [23]. Related in- equalities are verified by Colesanti [29], Colesanti, Livshyts, Marsiglietti [30], P. Nayar, T. Tkocz [73, 74], Xi, Leng [86]. In this paper, we focus on the L0 sum of replacing Minkowski addition. First, for λ (0, 1), the L or logarithmic sum of two origin symmetric ∈ 0 convex bodies K and C in Rn is defined by n 1 λ λ n 1 (1 λ) K + λ C = x R : x, u h (u) − h (u) u S − . − · 0 · ∈ h i≤ K C ∀ ∈ n o It is linearly invariant, as A((1 λ) K+ λ C) = (1 λ) A K+ λ AC for A − · 0 · − · 0 · ∈ GL(n). The following strengthening of the Brunn-Minkowski inequality for centered convex bodies is a long-standing and highly investigated conjecture. CONJECTURE 1.1 (Logarithmic Brunn-Minkowski conjecture) If λ (0, 1) and K and C are convex bodies in Rn whose centroid is the origin, ∈ then 1 λ λ V ((1 λ) K + λ C) V (K) − V (C) , (4) − · 0 · ≥ with equality if and only if K = K1 + . + Km and C = C1 + . + Cm compact convex sets K1,...,Km,C1,...,Cm of dimension at least one where m i=1 dim Ki = n and Ki and Ci are dilates, i = 1,...,m. P 3 We note that the choice of the right translates of K and C are important in Conjecture 1.1 according to the examples by Nayar, Tkocz [73]. On the other hand, the following is an equivalent form of the origin symmetric case of the Logarithmic Brunn-Minkowski conjecture for o-symmetric convex bodies. n 1 The cone volume measure or L0-surface area measure VK on S − , whose study was initiated independently by Firey [46] and Gromov and Milman [53], has become an indispensable tool in the last decades (see say Barthe, Gu´edon, Mendelson, Naor [12], Naor [72], Paouris, Werner [76]). If a convex body K contains the origin, then its cone volume measure is 1 dVK = n hK dSK where hK is the support function of K and the total measure is the volume of K. Following partial and related results by Andrews [2], Chou, Wang [28], He, Leng, Li [54], Henk, Sch¨urman, Wills [56], Stancu [84], Xiong [87] the paper Boroczky, Lutwak, Yang, Zhang [21] characterized even cone volume measures by the so called subspace concentration condition. Recently, break- through results have been obtained by Chen, Li, Zhu [27], Chen, Huang, Li [26], Kolesnikov [63], Nayar, Tkocz [74], Kolesnikov, Milman [65], Putter- man [79] about the uniqueness of the solution, which is intimately related to the conjectured log-Minkowski inequality Conjecture 1.2. As it turns out, subspace concentration condition also holds for the cone-volume measure VK if the centroid of a general convex body K is the origin (see Henk, Linke [55] and B¨or¨oczky, Henk [17, 18]). CONJECTURE 1.2 (Logarithmic Minkowski conjecture) If K and C are convex bodies in Rn whose centroid is the origin, then hC V (K) V (C) log dVK log n−1 h ≥ n V (K) ZS K with the same equality conditions as in Conjecture 1.1. Actually understanding the equality case in the Logarithmic Minkowski Conjecture 1.2 for o-symmetric convex bodies clarifies the uniqueness of the solution of the Monge-Ampere type logarithmic Minkowski Problem in the even case (see Boroczky, Lutwak, Yang, Zhang [20], Kolesnikov, Milman [65], Chen, Huang, Li, Liu [26]). In R2, Conjecture 1.1 is verified in Boroczky, Lutwak, Yang, Zhang [20] for o-symmetric convex bodies, but it is still open in general. On the other hand, Xi, Leng [86] proved that any two dimensional convex bodies K and C in R2 can be translated in a way such that (4) holds for the translates. 4 In higher dimensions, Conjecture 1.1 is proved for with enough hyperplane symmetries (cf. Theorem 1.3) and complex bodies (cf. Rotem [81]). For o-symmetric convex bodies, Conjecture 1.2 is proved when K is close to be an ellipsoid by a combination of the local estimates by Kolesnikov, Mil- man [65] and the use of the continuity method in PDE by Chen, Huang, Li, Liu [26]. Another even more recent proof of this result based on Alexan- drov’s approach of considering the Hilbert-Brunn-Minkowski operator for polytopes is due to Putterman [79]. Additional local versions of Conjec- ture 1.2 for o-symmetric convex bodies are due to Kolesnikov, Livshyts [64]. We say that A GL(n) is a linear reflection associated to the linear ∈ (n 1)-space H Rn if A fixes the points of H and det A = 1.
Recommended publications
  • The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality
    The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality Proofs and applications in various spaces Cauchy-Schwarz olikhet Bevis och tillämpningar i olika rum Thomas Wigren Faculty of Technology and Science Mathematics, Bachelor Degree Project 15.0 ECTS Credits Supervisor: Prof. Mohammad Sal Moslehian Examiner: Niclas Bernhoff October 2015 THE CAUCHY-SCHWARZ INEQUALITY THOMAS WIGREN Abstract. We give some background information about the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality including its history. We then continue by providing a number of proofs for the inequality in its classical form using various proof tech- niques, including proofs without words. Next we build up the theory of inner product spaces from metric and normed spaces and show applications of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in each content, including the triangle inequality, Minkowski's inequality and H¨older'sinequality. In the final part we present a few problems with solutions, some proved by the author and some by others. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D15. Key words and phrases. Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, mathematical induction, triangle in- equality, Pythagorean theorem, arithmetic-geometric means inequality, inner product space. 1 2 THOMAS WIGREN 1. Table of contents Contents 1. Table of contents2 2. Introduction3 3. Historical perspectives4 4. Some proofs of the C-S inequality5 4.1. C-S inequality for real numbers5 4.2. C-S inequality for complex numbers 14 4.3. Proofs without words 15 5. C-S inequality in various spaces 19 6. Problems involving the C-S inequality 29 References 34 CAUCHY-SCHWARZ INEQUALITY 3 2. Introduction The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality may be regarded as one of the most impor- tant inequalities in mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • On Isoperimetric Inequalities in Minkowski Spaces
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2010, Article ID 697954, 18 pages doi:10.1155/2010/697954 Research Article On Isoperimetric Inequalities in Minkowski Spaces Horst Martini1 and Zokhrab Mustafaev2 1 Faculty of Mathematics, University of Technology Chemnitz, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany 2 Department of Mathematics, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Horst Martini, [email protected] Received 11 July 2009; Revised 2 December 2009; Accepted 4 March 2010 Academic Editor: Ulrich Abel Copyright q 2010 H. Martini and Z. Mustafaev. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The purpose of this expository paper is to collect some mainly recent inequalities, conjectures, and open questions closely related to isoperimetric problems in real, finite-dimensional Banach spaces Minkowski spaces. We will also show that, in a way, Steiner symmetrization could be used as a useful tool to prove Petty’s conjectured projection inequality. 1. Introductory General Survey In Geometric Convexity, but also beyond its limits, isoperimetric inequalities have always played a central role. Applications of such inequalities can be found in Stochastic Geometry, Functional Analysis, Fourier Analysis, Mathematical Physics, Discrete Geometry, Integral Geometry, and various further mathematical disciplines. We will present a survey on isoperimetric inequalities in real, finite-dimensional Banach spaces, also called Minkowski spaces. In the introductory part a very general survey on this topic is given, where we refer to historically important papers and also to results from Euclidean geometry that are potential to be extended to Minkowski geometry,thatis,to the geometry of Minkowski spaces of dimension d ≥ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article on Isoperimetric Inequalities in Minkowski Spaces
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2010, Article ID 697954, 18 pages doi:10.1155/2010/697954 Research Article On Isoperimetric Inequalities in Minkowski Spaces Horst Martini1 and Zokhrab Mustafaev2 1 Faculty of Mathematics, University of Technology Chemnitz, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany 2 Department of Mathematics, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Horst Martini, [email protected] Received 11 July 2009; Revised 2 December 2009; Accepted 4 March 2010 Academic Editor: Ulrich Abel Copyright q 2010 H. Martini and Z. Mustafaev. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The purpose of this expository paper is to collect some mainly recent inequalities, conjectures, and open questions closely related to isoperimetric problems in real, finite-dimensional Banach spaces Minkowski spaces. We will also show that, in a way, Steiner symmetrization could be used as a useful tool to prove Petty’s conjectured projection inequality. 1. Introductory General Survey In Geometric Convexity, but also beyond its limits, isoperimetric inequalities have always played a central role. Applications of such inequalities can be found in Stochastic Geometry, Functional Analysis, Fourier Analysis, Mathematical Physics, Discrete Geometry, Integral Geometry, and various further mathematical disciplines. We will present a survey on isoperimetric inequalities in real, finite-dimensional Banach spaces, also called Minkowski spaces. In the introductory part a very general survey on this topic is given, where we refer to historically important papers and also to results from Euclidean geometry that are potential to be extended to Minkowski geometry,thatis,to the geometry of Minkowski spaces of dimension d ≥ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • On Isoperimetric Inequalities in Minkowski Spaces
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2010, Article ID 697954, 18 pages doi:10.1155/2010/697954 Research Article On Isoperimetric Inequalities in Minkowski Spaces Horst Martini1 and Zokhrab Mustafaev2 1 Faculty of Mathematics, University of Technology Chemnitz, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany 2 Department of Mathematics, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Horst Martini, [email protected] Received 11 July 2009; Revised 2 December 2009; Accepted 4 March 2010 Academic Editor: Ulrich Abel Copyright q 2010 H. Martini and Z. Mustafaev. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The purpose of this expository paper is to collect some mainly recent inequalities, conjectures, and open questions closely related to isoperimetric problems in real, finite-dimensional Banach spaces Minkowski spaces. We will also show that, in a way, Steiner symmetrization could be used as a useful tool to prove Petty’s conjectured projection inequality. 1. Introductory General Survey In Geometric Convexity, but also beyond its limits, isoperimetric inequalities have always played a central role. Applications of such inequalities can be found in Stochastic Geometry, Functional Analysis, Fourier Analysis, Mathematical Physics, Discrete Geometry, Integral Geometry, and various further mathematical disciplines. We will present a survey on isoperimetric inequalities in real, finite-dimensional Banach spaces, also called Minkowski spaces. In the introductory part a very general survey on this topic is given, where we refer to historically important papers and also to results from Euclidean geometry that are potential to be extended to Minkowski geometry,thatis,to the geometry of Minkowski spaces of dimension d ≥ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Lp Spaces and Banach Spaces
    IVbookroot July 6, 2011 Copyrighted Material 1 Lp Spaces and Banach Spaces In this work the assumption of quadratic integrability will be replaced by the integrability of jf(x)jp. The analysis of these function classes will shed a particu­ lar light on the real and apparent advantages of the exponent 2; one can also expect that it will provide essential material for an axiomatic study of function spaces. F. Riesz, 1910 At present I propose above all to gather results about linear operators defined in certain general spaces, no­ tably those that will here be called spaces of type (B)... S. Banach, 1932 Function spaces, in particular Lp spaces, play a central role in many questions in analysis. The special importance of Lp spaces may be said to derive from the fact that they offer a partial but useful generalization of the fundamental L2 space of square integrable functions. In order of logical simplicity, the space L1 comes first since it occurs already in the description of functions integrable in the Lebesgue sense. Connected to it via duality is the L1 space of bounded functions, whose supremum norm carries over from the more familiar space of continuous functions. Of independent interest is the L2 space, whose origins are tied up with basic issues in Fourier analysis. The intermediate Lp spaces are in this sense an artifice, although of a most inspired and fortuitous kind. That this is the case will be illustrated by results in the next and succeeding chapters. In this chapter we will concentrate on the basic structural facts about the Lp spaces.
    [Show full text]