Structural Investigations of the Italian Trap Allochthon, Redington Pass, Pima County, Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Structural Investigations of the Italian Trap Allochthon, Redington Pass, Pima County, Arizona Structural investigations of the Italian Trap Allochthon, Redington Pass, Pima County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Benson, Gregory Scott Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 07:35:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/557699 STRUCTURAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE ITALIAN TRAP ALLOCHTHON, REDINGTON PASS, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA by Gregory Scott Benson A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 8 1 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re­ quirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judg­ ment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholar­ ship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: *G. H. DAVIS Date Professor of Geosciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply thankful to several people without whose help this thesis would not have been possible. Foremost, I am grateful to Dr. George H. Davis, who acted as thesis advisor, for suggesting this project, arranging for my transportation to and from the study area, and for his firm guiding hand in the editing of this manuscript. Drs. Peter Coney and Joseph F. Schreiber, Jr. were helpful by providing enlightening discussion of field relationships. This work has bene- fitted greatly from conversations with Steven H. Lingrey, a fellow graduate student, who graciously led me on a field trip in Paige Canyon and provided me with his maps. Dean Warner lead me through his thesis study area in the Bar LY Ranch/Mineta Ridge locality and discussed his findings with me. I would like to thank Jeffrey A. Grover and Ralph D. Rogers for their moral support and lengthy dialogues, and my wife Kellee for her constant understanding, inestimable support, and the typing of the manuscript. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.................. .. ..................... vi ABSTRACT ...................................................... viii INTRODUCTION.......... .................... .................... 1 H CN CN CN HCN VO m P u r pose.................... .. Location of Area .............. Previous Work .......... GEOLOGY OF ITALIAN TRAP ALLOCHTHON . Major Structural Components .... Rock Units ............ Autochthonous Crystalline Rocks Porphyritic Granite .... Garnet Muscovite Granite .......... .............. 10 Microdiorite . ..................................... 12 Mylonitic Gneisses .................. 12 Allochthonous Crystalline R o c k s ............. 15 Upper Domain . ......................... 15 Lower Domain . ............ 15 Allochthonous Metasedimentary Tectonites .............. 18 Introduction ........... .......... 18 Cambrian Bolsa Quartzite .......................... 19 Cambrian Abrigo Formation .......................... 21 Devonian Martin Formation .......................... 21 Mississippian Escabrosa Limestone .... .......... 22 Pennsylvanian Horquilla Limestone .................. 24 Pennsylvanian and Permian Earp Formation .......... 26 Allochthonous Tertiary Sedimentary and Volcanic Rocks . 28 Mlneta Formation .......... 28 Turkey Track Porphyry ............................... 29 General Orientations ..... ...................... ... 31 Structures of Italian Trap Allochthon ...................... 33 Lineation and Boudins in the Allochthon ................ 33 Faults of the A l l o c h t h o n ............................... 36 Low-Angle Detachment Fault ..... .............. 36 Faults within the A l l o c h t h o n ...................... 40 Subconcordant Low-Angle Faults .................... 41 High-Angle Faults ................................... 42 iv V TABLE OF CONTENTS— Continued Page Faults in the Autochthon ............................... 43 Folds in the Italian Trap A l l o c h t h o n .................. 44 Introduction ....................................... 44 Northeast-Trending Upright F o l d ................... 44 Northwest-Trending Upright Folds .............. 44 Asymmetric Folds ................................... 46 INTERPRETATION...................... 51 Slip-Line Determination ..................................... 51 Subconcordant Low-Angle Faulting .............. .... 51 Asymmetric Folding ................................. 51 Fault G r ooves....................................... 53 High-Angle Faulting ....... ...................... 56 Detachment Faulting ..................................... 56 Shape of F a u l t ................................... 57 Orientation of Planar Elements .................... 57 Significance of Tectonite Fabrics ............ 58 Metasedimentary Rock Fabrics . ........... 58 Mylonitic Crystalline Rock Fabrics .................... 59 Conditions of Deformation........................ 60 Grade of Metamorphism.......... 60 Nature of Deformation ................................... 61 Folding............................................. 61 Faulting ......................... 61 CONCLUSIONS......................................... 63 Timing of Tectonic Events ..................................... 63 Emplacement of Italian Trap A l l o c h t h o n .................. 66 Summary ..... ........................................ 68 APPENDIX 1: Supplemental Orientational Data ..................... 71 APPENDIX 2: Asymmetric Fold D a t a ................................. 77 LIST OF REFERENCES 81 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. General Geology and Diagrammatic Cross Sections of the Santa Catalina-Rincon Metamorphic Core Complex ........ 3 2. View of Italian Trap Allochthon from Redington Road; Looking South ........................................... 4 3. Major Structural Components of Italian Trap Allochthon. and Its Undergirding Crystalline Terrane .............. 7 4. Map of Faults, Lithologies, and Structural Domains of Italian Trap Allochthon .......... .......... 8 5. Structural Geologic Map of Italian Trap Allochthon .... 13 6. Geologic Cross Sections through Italian Trap Allochthon............................................... 14 7. Large-Scale Maps of Crystalline Tectonites in Lower Domains of Italian Trap Allochthon ...................... 17 8. Close-Up Photograph of Bolsa Quartzite near Detachment F a u l t s ................................................. 20 9. Photograph of Escabrosa Limestone Illustrating Schistose Foliation in Pure Calcite Marble ...................... 23 10. Close-Up Photograph of Horquilla Limestone Showing Abundant Siliceous Interbeds .... ............... 25 11. Photograph of Hematite Pseudomorphs after Pyrite in Phyllites of the Earp Formation ......................... 27 12. Photograph of Typical Outcrop of the Tertiary Turkey Track Andesite P o r p h y r y .......... 30 13. Pi-Diagram of 659 Foliation and Compositional Layering Measurements from Italian Trap Allochthon .............. 32 14. Lower-Hemisphere Equal-Area Stereographic Projection of Lineation Measurements in the Allochthonous Tectonites . 34 vi vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS— Continued Page 15. Tracing of Field Sketch of Outcrop Showing Three Dimensional Nature of Lenses within the Horquilla Limestone.................. .......................... 35 16. Tracing of Field Sketch of Small Isoclinally Folded Siliceous Interbed in the Escabrosa Limestone of Domain i l l .............................. 35 17. Topographic Analysis of Italian Trap Area as Guide to Determining Probable Detachment Fault Shape ........... 38 18. Topographic Map of Tanque Verde Wash Illustrating Steep Dips of the Detachment Surface which Define Deep Fault Grooves ......................................... 39 19. Lower-Hemisphere Equal-Area Stereographic Projection of Poles to Bedding Planes in the Mineta Formation of Domain x v ............ 45 20. Small Asymmetric Fold of Transitional Style in the Upper Escabrosa Limestone ................................... 48 21. Photograph of a Large Asymmetric Fold at the Contact between Domains ill and vi ....................... 49 22. Contoured Lower-Hemisphere Equal-Area Stereographic Projection of 46 Asymmetric Fold Ax e s ................. 50 23. Lower-Hemisphere Equal-Area Stereographic Projection of Asymmetric Fold Axes Individually Labeled as to Sense of A s y m m e t r y ......................................... 54 24. Lower-Hemisphere Equal-Area Stereographic Plot of Asymmetric Fold Axes Exclusive of Those in Domain ill . 55 25. Tectonic Paragenesis Chart Showing Relative Timing of Ductile, Moderately Ductile, and Brittle Deformational and Faulting E v e n t s ........................ 64 26. Diagrammatic Structural Profiles through a) Redington Pass, and b) Paige Canyon Area, Comparing
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona)
    GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE CATALINA FOOTHILLS, OUTSKIRTS OF TUCSON (PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA) W.R. DICKINSON Emeritus, Dept. of Geosciences University of Arizona ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B MAY 1999 31 p., scale 1 :24,000 TIus report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for confonnity with Arizona Geological Survey standards. ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B (31 pp., 1 Plate) Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona) [Text and Legend to Accompany 1:24,000 Map] William R. Dickinson, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona May 1999 Introduction and Purpose Past geologic maps and accounts of the sedimentary, geomorphic, and structural geology of the piedmont of the Santa Catalina Mountains in the outskirts of Tucson by Voelger (1953), Pashley (1966), Davidson (1973), Creasey and Theodore (1975), Banks (1976), Anderson (1987), Pearthree et al. (1988), McKittrick (1988), and Jackson (1989) raised questions about the sedimentary evolution of the foothills belt that were left open or unresolved. Multiple dissected alluvial fans and pediments overlie much older faulted and tilted strata to form Cenozoic sedimentary assemblages of considerable stratigraphic and structural complexity. As a contribution to improved understanding of urban geology in the Tucson metropolitan area, systematic geologic mapping of the piedmont belt was undertaken to establish the overall geologic framework of the Catalina foothills (~ 175 2 km ) at a common scale (1 :24,000). The area studied extends from Oracle Road on the west to the vicinity of Rinconado Road on the east, and from the Rillito River and Tanque Verde Wash northward to the limit of bedrock exposures at the base of the Santa Catalina Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Redington 7½' Quadrangle, Cochise, Graham, And
    Geologic Map of the Soza Canyon 7½' Quadrangle, Cochise and Pima Counties, Arizona by Jon E. Spencer, Stephen M. Richard, Joseph P. Cook, William R. Dickinson, Steven H. Lingrey, and Jerome H. Guynn Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map DGM-61 version 2.0 May, 2009 Scale 1:24,000 (1 sheet, with text) Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 This geologic map was funded in part by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, award no. 06HQAG0051. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. Geologic Map of the Soza Canyon 7½' Quadrangle, Cochise and Pima Counties, Arizona by Jon E. Spencer, Stephen M. Richard, Joseph P. Cook, William R. Dickinson, Steven H. Lingrey, and Jerome H. Guynn INTRODUCTION The Soza Canyon 7 ½′ Quadrangle includes part of the San Pedro River, flanking valley fill, and bedrock on the southwest side of the valley that forms part of the Rincon Mountains (Figure 1). Production of this new geologic map continues the Arizona Geological Survey mapping program of the San Pedro River valley. This mapping was done under the joint State-Federal STATEMAP program, as specified in the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992, and was jointly funded by the Arizona Geological Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under STATEMAP Program Contract award number 06HQAG0051. Mapping was compiled digitally using ESRI ArcGIS software. Parts of the Soza Canyon 7 ½′ Quadrangle were mapped previously by Thorman and Drewes (1981), Lingrey (1982), Dickinson (1987, 1991, 1998), and Dickinson and Olivares (1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Oracle Ridge Mine and Mining District, Pima County, AZ
    Geology of the Oracle Ridge Mine and Mining District Pima County, Arizona Contributions from the Staff of Oracle Ridge Mining Partners, Jon Spencer, and Excerpts from GSA Memoir 153 Edited by Mark Miller Guidebook for the Arizona Geological Society Spring Field Trip [April 1995] Arizona Geological Society P.O. Box 40952, Tucson, AZ 85717 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Geology of the Oracle Ridge Mine and Mining District Pima County, Arizona Contributions from the Staff of Oracle Ridge Mining Partners, Jon Spencer, and Excerpts from GSA Memoir 153 Edited by Mark Miller Guidebook for the Arizona Geological Society Spring Field Trip [April 1995) Arizona Geological Society P.O. Box 40952, Tucson, AZ 85717 April 15, 1995 Dear Field Trip Participant: I bid you welcome to the 1995 spring field trip of the Arizona Geological Society. Today, we will be visiting the Oracle Ridge Mine owned and operated by the Oracle Ridge Mining Partners. The trip will encompass both a surface and underground look at a 1OOOTPD copper mine. The orebodies are hosted in Paleozoic carbonates which occur as a roof pendant above a Laramide quartz diorite intrusion and have been later structurally deformed. ORMP list reserves (in the proven and probable catagory) at 9.6 million tons at 2.32% Cu principally as chalcopyrite, chalcocite and bornite, There is a little gold and silver byproduct. I wish to thank the staff and management of ORMP for their permission to visit itt their operation. I would also like to thank Jon Spencer for his resume on the ... geology of the Catalina Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pima County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input
    The Pima County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input February, 2012 Artist rendering of proposed overpass along State Route 77, courtesy of Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection Arizona Game and Fish Department Primarily funded by the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup and the Pima County Wildlife Connectivity Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ ii RECOMMENDED CITATION .................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. iii DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 2 THE PIMA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ..................................... 11 METHODS ................................................................................................................................... 12 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department Of. the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Map, description and bibliography of the Mineralized Areas of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona By Stanley B. Keith 1 Lorraine Schnabel 2 , Ed DeWitt 2 Don E. Gest 3 . and Jan Wilt* Open-File Report 84-0086 1983 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology; present address: MAGMACHEM Assoc., 5114 E. Tunder Dr., Phoenix, Arizona 85044 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, 845 N. Park Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ^J.C. Wilt and Co., 3035 So. Shiela Ave., Tucson, Arizona 85746 Contents Page Introduction..............................................................1 Classification and nomenclature of the Mineralized Areas..................! Commodities and deposit descriptions......................................2 Sources of information....................................................2 Acknowledgements..........................................................2 References cited..........................................................5 Bibliography.............................................................47 Illustrations Plate 1. Map of the Mineralized Areas of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona..............................................in pocket Tables Table 1. Summary of deposit types of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona......................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • The Following File Is Part of the A. F. Budge Mining Ltd. Mining Collection
    CONTACT INFORMATION Mining Records Curator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85701 602-771-1601 http://www.azgs.az.gov [email protected] The following file is part of the A. F. Budge Mining Ltd. Mining Collection ACCESS STATEMENT These digitized collections are accessible for purposes of education and research. We have indicated what we know about copyright and rights of privacy, publicity, or trademark. Due to the nature of archival collections, we are not always able to identify this information. We are eager to hear from any rights owners, so that we may obtain accurate information. Upon request, we will remove material from public view while we address a rights issue. CONSTRAINTS STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey does not claim to control all rights for all materials in its collection. These rights include, but are not limited to: copyright, privacy rights, and cultural protection rights. The User hereby assumes all responsibility for obtaining any rights to use the material in excess of “fair use.” The Survey makes no intellectual property claims to the products created by individual authors in the manuscript collections, except when the author deeded those rights to the Survey or when those authors were employed by the State of Arizona and created intellectual products as a function of their official duties. The Survey does maintain property rights to the physical and digital representations of the works. QUALITY STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey is not responsible for the accuracy of the records, information, or opinions that may be contained in the files.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Land Use and Natural Resources in the Middle San Pedro River Valley, Arizona Na T H a N F
    PRING S 3 Volume 53 Number 1 JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHWEST Spring 2011 TUCSON UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA THE SOUTHWEST CENTER Journal of the Southwest, founded in 1959 as Arizona and the West, began publishing in its current format in 1987. A refereed journal published quarterly by the Southwest Center at the University of Arizona, Journal of the South- west invites scholarly articles, essays, and reviews informing any aspect of the Greater Southwest (including northern Mexico). Dedicated to an integrated regional study, the journal publishes broadly across disciplines, including: intel- lectual and social history, anthropology, architecture, literary studies, folklore, historiography, politics, Borderlands studies, and regional natural history. Submissions (typed, double-spaced, in duplicate, and on CD) and inquiries should be made to Joseph C. Wilder, Editor, 1052 N. Highland Avenue, Uni- versity of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721. Telephone (520) 621-2484. Journal of the Southwest is indexed in America: History and Life, Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Current Contents, Historical Abstracts, Anthropo- logical Index Online, and MLA International Bibliography. Electronic issues of Journal of the Southwest are available online from Academic OneFile (1995–), General OneFile (1995–), Wilson OmniFile (1998–), JSTOR (1959–), and Project MUSE. Journal of the Southwest assumes no responsibility for statements or opinions of contributors. Journal of the Southwest (ISSN 0894-8410) is published quarterly at a subscription price of $25 for individuals and $65 for institutions. Foreign sub- scriptions are $50 for individuals and $75 for institutions, postage included. The price for a single issue is $15, including shipping and handling (this may be higher for some issues).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement Contributions
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR PROPOSED SUNZIA TRANSMISSION LINE ROUTES TRAVERSING THE SAN PEDRO RIVER VALLEY SUBMITTED BY THE CASCABEL WORKING GROUP JULY 28, 2010 i AUTHORS NEPA requires that the preparers of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and their qualifications be listed. Daniel Baker is the principal author of this document. Mr. Baker received his Bachelor of Arts degrees in Philosophy and English Literature from Westmont College in Santa Barbara, California before several years of graduate study in Philosophy of Religion. He eschewed doctoral fellowships in philosophy to pursue a career in graphic arts. As a principal partner in a successful business, he served in several administrative and executive capacities before moving to Cascabel in 1994 where he has lived since. He is a major shareholder in the Saguaro Juniper Corporation, and was a founder of the non-profit Cascabel Hermitage Association where he continues to serve on the board of directors as secretary. He served as a Supervisor for the Redington Natural Resource Conservation District (NRCD) for several years and was naMed NRCD Cooperator of the Year in 1996. He was hired by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and served in the capacity of Cascabel Community Steward until 2002. He was principally involved in TNC’s acquisition of the Three-Links Farm. In his TNC capacity he travelled the length of the San Pedro River from its headwaters in Mexico to its confluence with the Gila River, and helped lead numerous tours of its lower reaches. He facilitated and recently helped complete conservation easements on nearly 2000 acres in Hot Springs Canyon, a major tributary of the San Pedro River.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Ecology of an Arid Basin Tres Alamos-Redington Area Southeastern Arizona
    Plant Ecology of an Arid Basin Tres Alamos-Redington Area Southeastern Arizona GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 485-D Plant Ecology of an Arid Basin Tres Alamos-Redington Area Southeastern Arizona By ROBERT C. ZIMMERMANN VEGETATION AND HYDROLOGIC PHENOMENA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 485-D A study of variations in the plant cover of an arid basin^ primarily as related to differences in surface-flow regimen UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page List of plants....__-_-_-_____-_-___-__----___-_---__ V Vegetation Continued Abstract_ _ ________________________________________ Dl Variation in the vegetation of valley floors Con. Introduction.___-____-______.---____--_-_____-_-____ 2 Vegetation of the San Pedro River bottom lands..-..------_--_----_----_----___ D27 Physical setting.__________-_---_____-_--___________ 2 Summary. _ _______________________________ 28 Topography_ _________________________________ 2 Germination of valley-floor species_____________ 29 Bedrock geology._______________________________ 4 General interpretation of the ecology of valley- Valley-fill geology._-_____-_______-_-_______-_-__ 5 floor vegetation.________________________ 31 Soils- ___-._.___..-_-.-_____._..._-._.__..__.__ 6 Headwaters located on valley fill ____________ 31 Climate. -_______--______----___-_-_-_____-____
    [Show full text]
  • D O U G La S S Ta Tio N 'S a Re a O F O P E Ra Tio N S L E G E
    Legend Critical Habitat for the Beautiful Shiner Yaqui Catfish, and Yaqui Chub Proposed Critical Habitat for Mexican Spotted Owl 191 Border Patrol Station RVS Sites Tactical Checkpoint Roads Patrolled Drag Roads Helipatrol 80 Station Boundary within Study Area BLM Military National Wildlife Refuge Wilderness Private State Trust US Forest Service USFS & BLM Wilderness Area Douglas Station's Area of Operations 3-64 00.4 0.8 1.6 2.4 Miles 00.4 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2 Kilometers 1:100,000 Source: Douglas, Arizona USGS 1:250,000 topographic quads NOTE: Road designated as "roads patrolled" are subject to operational needs Figure 3-10: Critical Habitat for the Beautiful Shiner, Yaqui Catfish, and Yaqui Chub (Douglas Station) Date: September 2004 BW1 FOIA CBP 008488 Hummingbird Springs Wilderness Four Peaks Wilderness Salt River Canyon Wilderness NAVAJOAPACHE LA PAZ Bear Wallow Wilderness Big Horn Mountains Wilderness 10 Eagletail CIBOLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Mountains Wilderness Superstition Wilderness GILA Kofa Wilderness Trigo Mountain Wilderness Sierra Estrella Wilderness Signal Mountain Wilderness Fishhooks Wilderness New Water Mountains Wilderness MARICOPA Needle's Eye Wilderness GREENLEE Woolsey Peak Wilderness North Maricopa White Canyon Wilderness Mountains Wilderness Sonoran Desert IMPERIAL NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE National Monument Coronado National Forest South Maricopa Mountains Wilderness Santa Teresa WildernessGRAHAM CASA GRANDE PINAL Aravaipa Canyon Wilderness Muggins 8 Mountain Wilderness YUMA Table Top Wilderness YUMA Coronado National
    [Show full text]
  • Redington Natural Resources Conservation District C/O Deborrah
    A HISTORY OF LAND USE AND NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE CASCABEL-REDINGTON AREA OF THE SAN PEDRO VALLEY LOWER SAN PEDRO WATERSHED ASSESSMENT PROJECT, TASK 3 WPF #00-109 Submitted to: Redington Natural Resources Conservation District C/o Deborrah Smith 4963 North Cascabel Road Benson AZ 85602 By: Nathan F. Sayre, Ph.D. Department of Geography 507 McCone Hall #4740 Berkeley, California 94720 September 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report documents historical natural resource conditions, land uses and management practices in a ~450,000-acre area around Cascabel and Redington in the Lower San Pedro River watershed. It is based on published documents, unpublished archival sources, and interviews with long-time residents and experts. The principal findings are as follows: • The study area has been inhabited for at least 5,500 years and possibly twice that long. Agricultural communities based on irrigation of rich floodplain lands emerged not later than A.D. 1000. • The area was abandoned by A.D. 1500 for reasons that are not well understood. • Irrigated agriculture had revived in the area by the time of Spanish Jesuit missionary contact in the 1690s. The Sobaipuri Indians occupied half a dozen small villages at that time, supporting an estimated 285-575 persons. The Sobaipuris vacated the area under orders from the Spanish in 1762. Warfare with Apaches and general insecurity left the area largely unoccupied from then until approximately 1876. • Reoccupation occurred in the late 1870s and 1880s based on irrigated agriculture along the river and livestock grazing on the surrounding public domain. Outside wage labor was a supplementary source of livelihood for many homesteaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Organization and Migration at the Sabino Canyon Ruin Site, Arizona
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2014 Hohokam Population Dynamics: Settlement Organization and Migration at the Sabino Canyon Ruin Site, Arizona Daniel Shereff University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Shereff, Daniel, "Hohokam Population Dynamics: Settlement Organization and Migration at the Sabino Canyon Ruin Site, Arizona" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 596. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/596 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Hohokam Population Dynamics: Settlement Organization and Migration at the Sabino Canyon Ruin Site, Arizona A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Social Sciences University of Denver In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Degree Masters of Arts by Daniel Shereff March 2014 Advisor: Lawrence Conyers © Daniel Shereff 2014 All Rights Reserved Author: Daniel Shereff Title: Hohokam Cultural Change: Settlement Organization and Migration at the Sabino Canyon Ruin Site, Arizona Advisor: Lawrence Conyers Degree Date: March 2014 Abstract The Hohokam people occupied the southern Arizona desert for more than one thousand years from approximately 450 A.D. to 1450 A.D. Beginning approximately 1100 A.D., the Hohokam underwent a dramatic cultural change. This change was reflected in many aspects of the Hohokam way of life including architecture, trade, subsistence, and ceramic production.
    [Show full text]