The Following File Is Part of the A. F. Budge Mining Ltd. Mining Collection
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S. -
Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona)
GEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK OF THE CATALINA FOOTHILLS, OUTSKIRTS OF TUCSON (PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA) W.R. DICKINSON Emeritus, Dept. of Geosciences University of Arizona ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B MAY 1999 31 p., scale 1 :24,000 TIus report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for confonnity with Arizona Geological Survey standards. ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CONTRIBUTED MAP CM-99-B (31 pp., 1 Plate) Geologic Framework of the Catalina Foothills, Outskirts of Tucson (Pima County, Arizona) [Text and Legend to Accompany 1:24,000 Map] William R. Dickinson, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona May 1999 Introduction and Purpose Past geologic maps and accounts of the sedimentary, geomorphic, and structural geology of the piedmont of the Santa Catalina Mountains in the outskirts of Tucson by Voelger (1953), Pashley (1966), Davidson (1973), Creasey and Theodore (1975), Banks (1976), Anderson (1987), Pearthree et al. (1988), McKittrick (1988), and Jackson (1989) raised questions about the sedimentary evolution of the foothills belt that were left open or unresolved. Multiple dissected alluvial fans and pediments overlie much older faulted and tilted strata to form Cenozoic sedimentary assemblages of considerable stratigraphic and structural complexity. As a contribution to improved understanding of urban geology in the Tucson metropolitan area, systematic geologic mapping of the piedmont belt was undertaken to establish the overall geologic framework of the Catalina foothills (~ 175 2 km ) at a common scale (1 :24,000). The area studied extends from Oracle Road on the west to the vicinity of Rinconado Road on the east, and from the Rillito River and Tanque Verde Wash northward to the limit of bedrock exposures at the base of the Santa Catalina Mountains. -
Geologic Map of the Redington 7½' Quadrangle, Cochise, Graham, And
Geologic Map of the Soza Canyon 7½' Quadrangle, Cochise and Pima Counties, Arizona by Jon E. Spencer, Stephen M. Richard, Joseph P. Cook, William R. Dickinson, Steven H. Lingrey, and Jerome H. Guynn Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map DGM-61 version 2.0 May, 2009 Scale 1:24,000 (1 sheet, with text) Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 This geologic map was funded in part by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, award no. 06HQAG0051. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. Geologic Map of the Soza Canyon 7½' Quadrangle, Cochise and Pima Counties, Arizona by Jon E. Spencer, Stephen M. Richard, Joseph P. Cook, William R. Dickinson, Steven H. Lingrey, and Jerome H. Guynn INTRODUCTION The Soza Canyon 7 ½′ Quadrangle includes part of the San Pedro River, flanking valley fill, and bedrock on the southwest side of the valley that forms part of the Rincon Mountains (Figure 1). Production of this new geologic map continues the Arizona Geological Survey mapping program of the San Pedro River valley. This mapping was done under the joint State-Federal STATEMAP program, as specified in the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992, and was jointly funded by the Arizona Geological Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under STATEMAP Program Contract award number 06HQAG0051. Mapping was compiled digitally using ESRI ArcGIS software. Parts of the Soza Canyon 7 ½′ Quadrangle were mapped previously by Thorman and Drewes (1981), Lingrey (1982), Dickinson (1987, 1991, 1998), and Dickinson and Olivares (1987). -
Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas
Floristic Surveys of Saguaro National Park Protected Natural Areas William L. Halvorson and Brooke S. Gebow, editors Technical Report No. 68 United States Geological Survey Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USGS Sonoran Desert Field Station The University of Arizona, Tucson The Sonoran Desert Field Station (SDFS) at The University of Arizona is a unit of the USGS Western Ecological Research Center (WERC). It was originally established as a National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit (CPSU) in 1973 with a research staff and ties to The University of Arizona. Transferred to the USGS Biological Resources Division in 1996, the SDFS continues the CPSU mission of providing scientific data (1) to assist U.S. Department of Interior land management agencies within Arizona and (2) to foster cooperation among all parties overseeing sensitive natural and cultural resources in the region. It also is charged with making its data resources and researchers available to the interested public. Seventeen such field stations in California, Arizona, and Nevada carry out WERC’s work. The SDFS provides a multi-disciplinary approach to studies in natural and cultural sciences. Principal cooperators include the School of Renewable Natural Resources and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at The University of Arizona. Unit scientists also hold faculty or research associate appointments at the university. The Technical Report series distributes information relevant to high priority regional resource management needs. The series presents detailed accounts of study design, methods, results, and applications possibly not accommodated in the formal scientific literature. Technical Reports follow SDFS guidelines and are subject to peer review and editing. -
Pima Indian Mallow
Travell\1anagentent Tonto National Forest Sensitive Plant Species Report Rob rt Madera, Botany Intern, Tonto National Forest Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Affected Environment ................................................................................................................................... 4 Environmental Consequences ...................................................................................................................... 6 Legal and Regulatory Compliance ............................................................................................................. 6 Methodology and Assumptions ................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Assumptions .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Pima Indian Mallow .................................................................................................................................. 9 Alternative A – Direct and Indirect Effects.......................................................................................... 11 Alternative B– Direct and Indirect Effects .......................................................................................... -
Geology of the Oracle Ridge Mine and Mining District, Pima County, AZ
Geology of the Oracle Ridge Mine and Mining District Pima County, Arizona Contributions from the Staff of Oracle Ridge Mining Partners, Jon Spencer, and Excerpts from GSA Memoir 153 Edited by Mark Miller Guidebook for the Arizona Geological Society Spring Field Trip [April 1995] Arizona Geological Society P.O. Box 40952, Tucson, AZ 85717 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Geology of the Oracle Ridge Mine and Mining District Pima County, Arizona Contributions from the Staff of Oracle Ridge Mining Partners, Jon Spencer, and Excerpts from GSA Memoir 153 Edited by Mark Miller Guidebook for the Arizona Geological Society Spring Field Trip [April 1995) Arizona Geological Society P.O. Box 40952, Tucson, AZ 85717 April 15, 1995 Dear Field Trip Participant: I bid you welcome to the 1995 spring field trip of the Arizona Geological Society. Today, we will be visiting the Oracle Ridge Mine owned and operated by the Oracle Ridge Mining Partners. The trip will encompass both a surface and underground look at a 1OOOTPD copper mine. The orebodies are hosted in Paleozoic carbonates which occur as a roof pendant above a Laramide quartz diorite intrusion and have been later structurally deformed. ORMP list reserves (in the proven and probable catagory) at 9.6 million tons at 2.32% Cu principally as chalcopyrite, chalcocite and bornite, There is a little gold and silver byproduct. I wish to thank the staff and management of ORMP for their permission to visit itt their operation. I would also like to thank Jon Spencer for his resume on the ... geology of the Catalina Mountains. -
Table of Contents
BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE NEAR WEST ANALYSIS AREA ______________________________ RESOLUTION COPPER MINING Prepared for: 102 Magma Heights P.O. Box 1944 Superior, Arizona 85173 Prepared by: 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 March 2013 (Revised September 2014) Project No. 807.82/807.94 Resolution Copper Mining Near West Analysis Area Biological Evaluation TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1. Vegetation Mapping ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.2. Screening Analysis of Special Status and Forest Sensitive Species ............................................. 2 2.3. Special Status Plant Survey Methods ........................................................................................... 3 2.4. Desert Tortoise Survey Methods .................................................................................................. 4 3. ANALYSIS AREA DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................... 4 3.1. Human Use of the Analysis Area ................................................................................................ -
Saguaro Springs Specific Plan Was Adopted in 2005
SAGUARO SPRINGSSAGUARO BLOOM SPECIFIC PLAN Submitted to: TOWN OF MARANA 3696 West Orange Grove Road Tucson, Arizona 85741 Prepared for: EMPIRE COMPANIES 1016 West University Avenue, Suite 202 Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 Prepared by: THE PLANNING CENTER 110 South Church Avenue, Suite 6320 Tucson, Arizona 85701 With assistance from: STANTEC CONSULTING 201 North Bonita Avenue, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 And: PERLMAN ARCHITECTS 6045 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 105 Scottsdale, Arizona 85250 December 2005 Amended December 2017 (PCZ1711-002) For clarification of material contained in this Specific Plan, please contact: THE PLANNING CENTER 110 South Church Avenue, Suite 63202 E. Congress, Suite 600 Tucson, Arizona 85701 Telephone (520) 623-6146 Fax (520) 622-1950 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION A. SPECIFIC PLAN SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1 B. SAGUARO BLOOM SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT ...................................................................... 5 C. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................. 6 D. LOCATION ............................................................................................................................. 9 E. AUTHORITY & SCOPE ............................................................................................................ 9 II. DEVELOPMENT CAPABILITY REPORT A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... -
Mining a Database
C. DAVID BERTELSEN Adjunct Associate Research Scientist, UA SNRE Associated Researcher, UA Herbarium PRESENTED AT THE R.I.S.E. SYMPOSIUM OCTOBER 26, 2019 5 ≈1100 ac (0.6% of the entire range) I’ve explored only ≈ 80 ac on foot, Mt. Kimball Trail (white line) including the trail, 3.5 miles of the 4158 ft elevation gain canyon bottom, and several side drainages. 4 First hiked to Mt. Kimball in 1981 Data collection began in 1984 along five 1-mile long transects 3 SANTA 2 CATALINA MOUNTAINS 1 RINCON MOUNTAINS X CHECKLIST FOR DATA COLLECTION 1711 hikes to the peak (over 17,350 miles including X shorter hikes) 181,056 flowering records 82,573 vertebrate records 263,629 total records Cool Season (November-March) Tradescantia occidentalis SW CLIMATE: VARIABILITY AND DROUGHT Cool Season (November-March) The current drought is now the 4th worst megadroughtWarm Season (May in 1200-October) years SOURCE: Woodhouse et al. (2010) A 1,200-year perspective of 21st century drought in southwestern North American. PNAS 107:21283-21288. More frequent and prolonged drought is symptomatic of climate change Tradescantia occidentalis -10 -3 -2 -1 10 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 -5 0 5 Climate data source: www.prism.oregonstate.edu source: data Climate 1984 1984 89 the beenabove have area the study in temperatures annual average Since 1994, 1985 1985 PRECIPITATION ANOMALIES, 1984 ANOMALIES, PRECIPITATION 1986 1986 1984 ANOMALIES, TEMPERATURE 1987 1987 1988 1988 1989 1989 1990 1990 1991 1991 1992 1992 1993 1993 1994 1994 1995 89 the above been has precipitation annual years, 25 last the In 1995 1996 - 1996 1998 in except average year 1997 1997 1998 1998 1999 1999 2000 2000 - 2001 2001 - 2018 (0 = 1930 2018 (0 = 1930 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 - 2004 year average in only 7 years 7 only in average year 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 - 2008 2008 - 2018 AVERAGE) 2018 AVERAGE) 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 2018 -10 10 15 -5 0 5 83-84 84-85 85-86 86-87 87-88 88-89 89-90 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 warm seasons. -
Santa Catalina RANGER DISTRICT
Santa Catalina RANGER DISTRICT www.skyislandaction.org 11- 1 State of the Coronado Forest DRAFT 11.05.08 DRAFT 11.05.08 State of the Coronado Forest 11- 2 www.skyislandaction.org CHAPTER 11 Santa Catalina Ecosystem Management Area The sprawling Santa Catalina Ecosystem Ridge Wilderness encompasses 56,933 acres of rugged, Management Area (EMA) encompasses 265,148 acres steep terrain. Prominent topographical features such with elevations ranging from approximately 2,850 feet as Finger Rock, the Window, and Table Mountain are to 9,150 feet at the summit of Mt. Lemmon. This is visible from the Tucson metro area. The northern side one of the largest Management Areas on the of the Catalinas remains much less developed than the Coronado National Forest (Figure 11.1). The Santa southern side. The small town of Oracle sits near the Catalina and Rincon Mountain Ranges form the Forest boundary and the rough Oracle Control Road northern and eastern boundary of the Tucson Valley. leads up the north slopes connecting with Catalina The Santa Catalina Management Area experiences highway. Most of the Santa Catalina range is managed the most intense recreational use on the entire Forest. by the Coronado National Forest except for a small The paved route of General Hitchcock Highway area at the western foothills that is encompassed by transports visitors into the heart of the Santa Catalina Catalina State Park. range. Starting in saguaro dotted hillsides at the The eastern side of the Catalina range remains part northeastern edge of Tucson, the highway crisscrosses of an important wildlife corridor stretching across the 25 miles of steep mountain slopes passing numerous San Pedro Valley to the rugged and remote Galiuro developed campgrounds and scenic pullouts along the Mountains. -
The Pima County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input
The Pima County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input February, 2012 Artist rendering of proposed overpass along State Route 77, courtesy of Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection Arizona Game and Fish Department Primarily funded by the Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup and the Pima County Wildlife Connectivity Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ ii RECOMMENDED CITATION .................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. iii DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 2 THE PIMA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ..................................... 11 METHODS ................................................................................................................................... 12 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ............................................ -
United States Department Of. the Interior Geological
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Map, description and bibliography of the Mineralized Areas of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona By Stanley B. Keith 1 Lorraine Schnabel 2 , Ed DeWitt 2 Don E. Gest 3 . and Jan Wilt* Open-File Report 84-0086 1983 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology; present address: MAGMACHEM Assoc., 5114 E. Tunder Dr., Phoenix, Arizona 85044 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology, 845 N. Park Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ^J.C. Wilt and Co., 3035 So. Shiela Ave., Tucson, Arizona 85746 Contents Page Introduction..............................................................1 Classification and nomenclature of the Mineralized Areas..................! Commodities and deposit descriptions......................................2 Sources of information....................................................2 Acknowledgements..........................................................2 References cited..........................................................5 Bibliography.............................................................47 Illustrations Plate 1. Map of the Mineralized Areas of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona..............................................in pocket Tables Table 1. Summary of deposit types of the Basin and Range Province in Arizona......................................................3