Historia De La Ciencia (1543 - 2001) John Gribbin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historia De La Ciencia (1543 - 2001) John Gribbin Historia de la ciencia (1543 - 2001) www.librosmaravillosos.com John Gribbin 1 Preparado por Patricio Barros Historia de la ciencia (1543 - 2001) www.librosmaravillosos.com John Gribbin Introducción 1. Los hombres del Renacimiento 2. Los últimos místicos 3. Los primeros científicos 4. La ciencia encuentra su fundamento 5. La .revolución «newtoniana» 6. Horizontes de expansión 7. La ciencia ilustrada I. La química se pone al día 8. La ciencia ilustrada II. Avances en todos los frentes 9. La «revolución darwiniana» 10. Átomos y moléculas 11. Hágase la luz 12. El último gran triunfo de la ciencia clásica 13. El espacio interior 14. El ámbito de la vida 15. El espacio exterior CODA: el placer de descubrir Bibliografía 2 Preparado por Patricio Barros Historia de la ciencia (1543 - 2001) www.librosmaravillosos.com John Gribbin Agradecimientos Quiero dar las gracias a las siguientes instituciones por haberme facilitado el acceso a sus bibliotecas, así como a otros materiales: Académie Française y Jardín des Plantes, de París; Bodleian Library, en Oxford; Museo Británico y Museo de Historia Natural, Londres; Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge; Sociedad Geológica, Londres; Downc House, Kent; Linnaean Society, Londres; Royal Astronomical Society; Royal Geographical Society; Royal Institution; Trinity College, Dublin; Biblioteca de la Universidad de Cambridge. Como siempre, la Universidad de Sussex me proporcionó base y apoyo, incluido el acceso a Internet. Sería injusto destacar a alguna de las muchas personas que se prestaron a comentar conmigo ciertos aspectos del proyecto, pero ellas saben quiénes son y cuentan todas con mi agradecimiento. En este texto utilizo el pronombre personal de primera persona tanto en singular como en plural. El «yo», por supuesto, aparece allí donde presento mi propia opinión sobre algún tema científico, mientras que «nosotros» se utiliza para incluir a la coautora, Mary Gribbin, siempre que sea necesario. Su ayuda para garantizar que las palabras que siguen sean comprensibles a quienes no son científicos ha resultado imprescindible, aquí como en todos mis libros. 3 Preparado por Patricio Barros Historia de la ciencia (1543 - 2001) www.librosmaravillosos.com John Gribbin Introducción Lo más importante que la ciencia nos enseña sobre el lugar que ocupamos en el universo es que no somos especiales. El proceso comenzó en el siglo XII con la obra de Nicolás Copérnico, quien planteó que la Tierra no estaba en el centro del universo, se aceleró después de que Galileo, a principios del siglo XVII, utilizara un telescopio para obtener la prueba definitiva de que la Tierra es en realidad un planeta que describe una órbita alrededor del Sol. Figura 1. Un encuentro mítico entre grandes mentes: Aristóteles, Hevelius y Kepler discuten sobre la órbita de los cometas. (Extraído de la Cometographia de Hevelius, 1668.) Con las oleadas sucesivas de descubrimientos astronómicos que se produjeron 4 Preparado por Patricio Barros Historia de la ciencia (1543 - 2001) www.librosmaravillosos.com John Gribbin durante los siglos siguientes, los astrónomos se dieron cuenta de que, del mismo modo que la Tierra es un planeta ordinario, también el Sol es una estrella ordinaria (una de los varios cientos de miles de millones de estrellas que forman nuestra galaxia, la Vía Láctea) y la propia Vía Láctea es tan sólo una galaxia ordinaria (una de los varios cientos de miles de millones que hay en el universo visible). Llegaron incluso a plantear, a finales del siglo XX, que este universo puede no ser el único. Mientras sucedía todo esto, los biólogos intentaban sin éxito hallar alguna prueba de la existencia de una «fuerza vital» especial que diferenciara a la materia viva de la materia inerte, llegando a la conclusión de que la vida no es más que un conjunto de procesos químicos bastante complicados. El historiador se encuentra con una curiosa coincidencia: uno de los grandes hitos del comienzo de la investigación biológica sobre el cuerpo humano fue la publicación de De Humani Corporis Fabrica (Sobre la estructura del cuerpo humano) de Andrés Vesalio (Andreas Vesalius) en 1543, el mismo año en que Copérnico publicó finalmente De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium (Sobre las revoluciones de los cuerpos celestes). Esta coincidencia hizo que 1543 fiera el punto de partida para la revolución científica que habría de transformar primero Europa y luego el mundo. Por supuesto, cualquier fecha que elijamos para fijar el comienzo de la historia de la ciencia será siempre arbitraria, y, mi relato, además, está también limitado en el espacio geográfico, lo mismo que en el espacio de tiempo que cubre. Mi propósito es esbozar el desarrollo de la ciencia occidental desde el Renacimiento hasta aproximadamente el final del siglo XX. Esto significa dejar a un lado los logros de los antiguos griegos, los chinos y los científicos y filósofos islámicos, que tanto hicieron por mantener activa la búsqueda del conocimiento de nuestro mundo durante el período que los europeos denominamos «la edad oscura» y «la Edad Media». Sin embargo, también significa narrar una historia coherente, fijando claramente en el espacio y el tiempo el comienzo de la evolución de la visión del mundo que constituye el núcleo de nuestra forma de comprender el universo y el lugar que ocupamos en él actualmente. y es que la vida humana resulta no ser diferente de cualquier otro tipo de vida existente en la Tierra. Tal como quedó ya establecido en el siglo XIX en las obras de Charles Darwin y Alfred Wallace, todo lo que se necesita para hacer seres humanos a partir de las amebas es el proceso de 5 Preparado por Patricio Barros Historia de la ciencia (1543 - 2001) www.librosmaravillosos.com John Gribbin la evolución por selección natural y un montón de tiempo. Figura 2. Grabado de "Breve compendio de la esfera y de la arte de navigar", de Martín Cortés de Albacar, 1551. Todos los ejemplos que he mencionado aquí ilustran otra característica del proceso de contar la historia. Lo natural es describir los acontecimientos clave refiriéndose a la obra de los individuos que marcaron un hito en la ciencia —Copérnico. Vesalio, Darwin, Wallace y los demás. Pero esto no significa que la ciencia haya avanzado como resultado del trabajo de una serie de genios insustituibles dotados de una visión especial de cómo funciona el mundo. Pueden ser unos genios (aunque no siempre lo sean), pero ciertamente no son insustituibles. El progreso científico se construye paso a paso y, cuando llega el momento oportuno, como muestra el ejemplo de Darwin y Wallace, dos o más individuos, cada uno por su lado, pueden dar el paso siguiente. Es la suerte o un accidente histórico lo que decide cuál de ellos será recordado como descubridor de 6 Preparado por Patricio Barros Historia de la ciencia (1543 - 2001) www.librosmaravillosos.com John Gribbin un fenómeno y pasará con su nombre a la posteridad. Mucho más importante que el genio humano es el desarrollo de la tecnología, y no es sorprendente que el comienzo de la revolución científica «coincida» con el desarrollo del telescopio y el microscopio. Sólo se me ocurre una excepción parcial a esta situación, e incluso ese caso lo consideraría más especial de lo que lo consideran la mayoría de los historiadores de la ciencia. Isaac Newton fue claramente un caso especial, en parte por la amplitud de sus logros, pero sobre todo por la claridad con que fijó las reglas básicas con las que debía funcionar la ciencia. Sin embargo, hay que tener en cuenta que Newton se basó también en sus predecesores inmediatos, particularmente en Galileo Galilei y René Descartes, y en este sentido sus contribuciones eran una consecuencia natural de los logros anteriores. Si Newton no hubiera vivido, el progreso científico podría haberse retrasado durante unas cuantas décadas. Pero sólo unas pocas décadas, porque Edmond Halley o Robert Hooke podrían haber dado con la famosa ley de la gravitación universal, donde se dice que la fuerza de atracción entre dos masas es inversamente proporcional al cuadrado de la distancia que las separa; de hecho, Gottfried Leibniz inventó el cálculo independientemente de Newton (y lo hizo mejor); y la teoría ondulatoria de la luz de Christiaan Huygens, aun siendo excelente, quedó eclipsada porque Newton optó por hacerle la competencia con una teoría de partículas. Nada de esto me impedirá contar buena parte de mi versión de la historia de la ciencia refiriéndome a las personas que participaron en ella, incluido Newton. Mi elección de los personajes que destacan en esta historia no pretende se exhaustiva, ni tampoco es mi intención que los comentarios sobre sus vidas y obras sean completos. He elegido pasajes que son representativos del desarrollo de la ciencia en su contexto histórico. Algunos de estos pasajes y los personajes que participan en ellos resultarán conocidos, pero otros (así lo espero) no tanto. La importancia de las personas y de sus vidas estriba en que reflejan la sociedad en la que vivieron, y al comentar, por ejemplo, el modo en que el trabajo de un científico determinado fue consecuencia del de otro, lo que pretendo es indicar el modo en que una «generación» de científicos influyó en la siguiente. Podría parecer que aquí surge necesariamente la pregunta sobre cómo rodó el balón por primera vez, es decir, 7 Preparado por Patricio Barros Historia de la ciencia (1543 - 2001) www.librosmaravillosos.com John Gribbin sobre la «causa inicial». Pero en este caso es fácil encontrar la causa inicial: la ciencia occidental se puso en marcha porque existió el Renacimiento. Una vez que éste comenzó, con el impulso que recibió la tecnología quedó garantizado un progreso continuo que no se detendría. Las nuevas ideas científicas hicieron que la tecnología siguiera mejorando y esta tecnología más avanzada proporcionaba a los científicos los medios necesarios para comprobar sus nuevas teorías cada vez con mayor precisión.
Recommended publications
  • Cavendish the Experimental Life
    Cavendish The Experimental Life Revised Second Edition Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Series Editors Ian T. Baldwin, Gerd Graßhoff, Jürgen Renn, Dagmar Schäfer, Robert Schlögl, Bernard F. Schutz Edition Open Access Development Team Lindy Divarci, Georg Pflanz, Klaus Thoden, Dirk Wintergrün. The Edition Open Access (EOA) platform was founded to bring together publi- cation initiatives seeking to disseminate the results of scholarly work in a format that combines traditional publications with the digital medium. It currently hosts the open-access publications of the “Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge” (MPRL) and “Edition Open Sources” (EOS). EOA is open to host other open access initiatives similar in conception and spirit, in accordance with the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the sciences and humanities, which was launched by the Max Planck Society in 2003. By combining the advantages of traditional publications and the digital medium, the platform offers a new way of publishing research and of studying historical topics or current issues in relation to primary materials that are otherwise not easily available. The volumes are available both as printed books and as online open access publications. They are directed at scholars and students of various disciplines, and at a broader public interested in how science shapes our world. Cavendish The Experimental Life Revised Second Edition Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach Studies 7 Studies 7 Communicated by Jed Z. Buchwald Editorial Team: Lindy Divarci, Georg Pflanz, Bendix Düker, Caroline Frank, Beatrice Hermann, Beatrice Hilke Image Processing: Digitization Group of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Cover Image: Chemical Laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physico-Chemical Nature of the Chemical Bond: Valence Bonding and the Path of Physico-Chemical Emergence
    The physico-chemical nature of the chemical bond: valence bonding and the path of physico-chemical emergence by Martha Lynn Harris A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of the Institute for History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto © Martha Lynn Harris 2008 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-57876-6 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-57876-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Christa Jungnickel Russell Mccormmach on the History
    Archimedes 48 New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology Christa Jungnickel Russell McCormmach The Second Physicist On the History of Theoretical Physics in Germany The Second Physicist Archimedes NEW STUDIES IN THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 48 EDITOR JED Z. BUCHWALD, Dreyfuss Professor of History, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA. ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES JEREMY GRAY, The Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, The Open University, UK. TILMAN SAUER, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES SHARON KINGSLAND, Department of History of Science and Technology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA. MANFRED LAUBICHLER, Arizona State University, USA ADVISORY BOARD FOR MATHEMATICS, PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY HENK BOS, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands MORDECHAI FEINGOLD, California Institute of Technology, USA ALLAN D. FRANKLIN, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA KOSTAS GAVROGLU, National Technical University of Athens, Greece PAUL HOYNINGEN-HUENE, Leibniz University in Hannover, Germany TREVOR LEVERE, University of Toronto, Canada JESPER LU¨ TZEN, Copenhagen University, Denmark WILLIAM NEWMAN, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA LAWRENCE PRINCIPE, The Johns Hopkins University, USA JU¨ RGEN RENN, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Germany ALEX ROLAND, Duke University, USA ALAN SHAPIRO, University of Minnesota, USA NOEL SWERDLOW, California Institute of Technology, USA
    [Show full text]
  • On the Relativistic Responses to the Kaufmannn Experiments$
    Heuristics versus Norms: On the Relativistic Responses to the Kaufmannn ExperimentsI Jan Potters1 Centre for Philosophical Psychology, Department of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Grote Kauwenberg 18, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium Abstract The aim of this article is to provide a historical response to Michel Janssen's (2009) claim that the special theory of relativity establishes that relativistic phenomena are purely kinematical in nature, and that the relativistic study of such phenomena is completely independent of the dynamics of the systems displaying such behavior. This response will be formulated through a histori- cal discussion of one of Janssen's cases, the experiments carried out by Walter Kaufmann on the velocity-dependence of the electron's mass. Through a dis- cussion of the different responses formulated by early adherents of the princi- ple of relativity (Albert Einstein, Max Planck, Hermann Minkowski and Max von Laue) to these experiments, it will be argued that the historical devel- opment of the special theory of relativity argues against Janssen's historical IThe author would like to thank Richard Staley, Hasok Chang, Marco Giovanelli, Har- vey Brown, Dennis Lehmkuhl, Thomas Ryckman, and the audiences at the Fifth Young Researchers Day in Logic, History and Philosophy of Science 2016 (Brussels), the Forum Scientiarium Summerschools of 2017 and 2018 (T¨ubingen),and the EPSA 2017 confer- ence (Exeter). This article was partially written during a stay as a visiting student at the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Cambridge (UK). Email address: [email protected] (Jan Potters) 1Corresponding Author, Research Funded by the FWO (Research Foundation { Flan- ders) Preprint submitted to Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern PhysicsFebruary 12, 2019 presentation of the case, and that this raises questions about his general philosophical claim.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Origins of Spacetime Scott Walter
    The Historical Origins of Spacetime Scott Walter To cite this version: Scott Walter. The Historical Origins of Spacetime. Abhay Ashtekar, V. Petkov. The Springer Handbook of Spacetime, Springer, pp.27-38, 2014, 10.1007/978-3-662-46035-1_2. halshs-01234449 HAL Id: halshs-01234449 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01234449 Submitted on 26 Nov 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The historical origins of spacetime Scott A. Walter Chapter 2 in A. Ashtekar and V. Petkov (eds), The Springer Handbook of Spacetime, Springer: Berlin, 2014, 27{38. 2 Chapter 2 The historical origins of spacetime The idea of spacetime investigated in this chapter, with a view toward un- derstanding its immediate sources and development, is the one formulated and proposed by Hermann Minkowski in 1908. Until recently, the principle source used to form historical narratives of Minkowski's discovery of space- time has been Minkowski's own discovery account, outlined in the lecture he delivered in Cologne, entitled \Space and time" [1]. Minkowski's lecture is usually considered as a bona fide first-person narrative of lived events. Ac- cording to this received view, spacetime was a natural outgrowth of Felix Klein's successful project to promote the study of geometries via their char- acteristic groups of transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Christa Jungnickel Russell Mccormmach on the History Of
    Archimedes 48 New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology Christa Jungnickel Russell McCormmach The Second Physicist On the History of Theoretical Physics in Germany The Second Physicist Archimedes NEW STUDIES IN THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 48 EDITOR JED Z. BUCHWALD, Dreyfuss Professor of History, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA. ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES JEREMY GRAY, The Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, The Open University, UK. TILMAN SAUER, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES SHARON KINGSLAND, Department of History of Science and Technology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA. MANFRED LAUBICHLER, Arizona State University, USA ADVISORY BOARD FOR MATHEMATICS, PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY HENK BOS, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands MORDECHAI FEINGOLD, California Institute of Technology, USA ALLAN D. FRANKLIN, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA KOSTAS GAVROGLU, National Technical University of Athens, Greece PAUL HOYNINGEN-HUENE, Leibniz University in Hannover, Germany TREVOR LEVERE, University of Toronto, Canada JESPER LU¨ TZEN, Copenhagen University, Denmark WILLIAM NEWMAN, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA LAWRENCE PRINCIPE, The Johns Hopkins University, USA JU¨ RGEN RENN, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Germany ALEX ROLAND, Duke University, USA ALAN SHAPIRO, University of Minnesota, USA NOEL SWERDLOW, California Institute of Technology, USA
    [Show full text]
  • APS Announces Spring 2010 Prize and Award Recipients
    Spring 2010 APS Announces Spring 2010 Prize and Award Recipients Thirty-four prizes and awards will be presented during special sessions at three spring meetings of the Society: the 2010 March Meeting, March 15-19, in Portland, OR, the 2010 “April” Meeting, February 13-16, in Washington, DC, and the 2010 Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Meeting, May 25-29, in Houston, TX. Citations and biographical information for each recipient follow. The Apker Award recipients appeared in the December 2009 issue of APS News (http://www.aps.org/programs/ honors/awards/apker.cfm). Additional biographical information and appropriate web links can be found at the APS web site (http://www.aps.org/programs/honors/index.cfm). Nominations for most of next year’s prizes and awards are now being accepted. For details, see page 8 of this insert. 2010 Prizes, Awards and Dissertations Will Allis Prize for the liquid helium as warm-up calculations before doing concepts of traditional crystallography, especially the has developed a number of dimension reduction and Study of Ionized Gases nuclei. They made variational Monte Carlo calcula- appearance of quasi-crystals, and the applications of tabulation methodologies. His textbook “Turbulent tions of 16O in the early 1990s, and in 1995 he inher- electron microscopy. Flows” was published in 2000. Mark J. Kushner ited the Green’s function Monte Carlo program that University of Michigan Brian Pudliner had developed with Pandharipande Paul J. Steinhardt, the Albert Dannie Heineman Prize and Joseph Carlson. With Ewing Lusk and Ralph Citation: “For ground-breaking contributions to Einstein Professor in Science and for Mathematical Physics developing and applying hybrid plasma models that Butler it has just been adapted to computers with Director of the Princeton Center have advanced the fundamental understanding of the more than 30,000 processors.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Physics Takes Root in America: John Archibald Wheeler As Student and Mentor
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Terry M. Christensen for the Degree of Master of Science in History of Science presented on June 12, 2006 Title: Theoretical Physics Takes Root in America: John Archibald Wheeler as Student and Mentor Abstract approved: Signature redactedfor privacy. /\ U I Mary J0 Nye, Ph.D. John Archibald Wheeler (09 July 1911 ) is a familiar name to physicists and historians of physics alike. Among his many contributions to the corpus of knowledge, in 1939 John Wheeler and Niels Bohr co-authored the first paper on the generalized mechanism of nuclear fission. Beyond that seminal work, Wheeler was a key player in the production of the 'Fat Man' plutonium weapon in the Manhattan project, and later, in the development of the Hydrogen Bomb. Wheeler introduced the scattering matrix (or S-matrix) to account for all possible final quantum states of collisions between nucleons. After turning his attention to general relativity, Wheeler and his students made a number of significant contributions to cosmology and cosmology. In fact, John Wheeler coined the term "black hole," and developed the concepts of a "Planck Length," a Planck-time," "quantum foam," and "wormholes" in space-time. Outside the physics community however, considerably less is known about John Wheeler as a mentor of physicists. Mentoring is important because, while there can be no progress in physics without contributions to the corpus of knowledge, these contributions are, by their very nature additive. In contrast, the contributions of skilled mentors such as John Archibald Wheeler are multiplicative through a number of intellectual generations. Until quite recently, studies of mentoring in science were limited to 'laboratory' and/or 'field' disciplines such as chemistry and the life sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Physics in the American Century
    A Short History of Physics in the American Century NEW HISTORIES OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND MEDICINE Series Editors Margaret C. Jacob Spencer R. Weart A Short History of Physics in the American Century David C. Cassidy Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England 2011 Copyright © 2011 by David C. Cassidy All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data Cassidy, David C., 1945– A short history of physics in the American century / David C. Cassidy. p. cm.—(New histories of science, technology, and medicine) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0- 674- 04936- 9 (alk. paper) 1. Physics— United States— History. 2. Physicists— United States. I. Title. QC9.U5C36 2011 530.0973'0904—dc22 2011004099 Contents Introduction 1 1 Entering the New Century 6 2 American Physics Comes of Age 25 3 Surviving the Depression 52 4 The Physicists’ War 72 5 Taming the Endless Frontier 90 6 The New Physics 106 7 Sputnik: Action and Reaction 124 8 Revising the Partnership 144 Appendix: Tables 171 Notes 177 Acknowledgments 201 Index 203 A Short History of Physics in the American Century Introduction Physicists were in a celebratory mood at the turn to the twenty- fi rst cen- tury. Nearly every year of the de cade straddling 2000 brought celebra- tions of discoveries and breakthroughs that had revolutionized physics and transformed the world in which we live. The hundredth anniversaries of the discoveries of X-rays (1895), radioactivity (1896), the electron (1897), the idea of the quantum (1900), and Albert Einstein’s “year of miracles” (1905) fell during the years from 1995 to 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I: Family Trees
    Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Studies 7 Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach: Appendix I: Family Trees In: Christa Jungnickel and Russell McCormmach: Cavendish : The Experimental Life (Sec- ond revised edition 2016) Online version at http://edition-open-access.de/studies/7/ ISBN 978-3-945561-06-5 First published 2016 by Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 Germany Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Printed and distributed by: PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin http://www.book-on-demand.de/shop/14971 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Appendix I: Family Trees Cavendish and Grey Family Trees A biography of Henry Cavendish necessarily takes into account his social position. Both of Cavendish’s paternal and maternal grandparents were dukes and duchesses. The family trees in this appendix begin with the grandparents and their siblings, follow with his par- ents’ generation and then his own, and end with the one after his. By definition he was related to them all, though in most cases the relationship was not close, and he probably met only a small fraction of them, but because in eighteenth-century England, “family pride was such that members were usually well aware of distinguished connections,”154 he would have known about them. Although he associated mainly with persons drawn from another society, one of his own choosing, that of scientific colleagues, he did not abandon the one he was born into, nor could he have.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein – Image and Impact” At
    This PDF file contains most of the text of the Web exhibit “Einstein – Image and Impact” at http://www.aip.org/history/einstein. NOT included are many secondary pages reached by clicking on the illustrations, which contain some additional information and photo credits. You must also visit the Web exhibit to explore hyperlinks within the exhibit and to other exhibits, and to hear voice clips, for which the text is supplied here. Brought to you by The Center for History of Physics Copyright © 1996-2004 - American Institute of Physics Site created Nov. 1996, revised May 2004 http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/ Page 1 of 93 Table of Contents Formative Years I 3 Was Einstein’s Brain Different? 4 Formative Years II 5 Formative Years III 7 Formative Years IV 8 The Great Works I 9 Atoms in a Crystal… 11 E=mc2 12 Einstein Explains the Equivalence of Energy and Matter 14 The Great Works II 15 World Fame I 17 A Gravitational Lens… 18 World Fame II 19 Public Concerns I 21 Public Concerns II 23 Einstein Speaks on the Fate of the European Jews 24 Public Concerns III 25 The Quantum and the Cosmos I 27 You’re Looking at Quanta… 30 The Quantum and the Cosmos II 31 A Black Hole… 32 The Quantum and the Cosmos: At Home 33 The Nuclear Age I 34 The Nuclear Age II 36 Einstein Speaks on Nuclear Weapons and World Peace… 38 Nuclear Age: At Home 39 Science and Philosophy I 41 Can the Laws of Physics be Unified? 42 Science and Philosophy II 44 The World As I See It, An Essay By Einstein 45 Einstein’s Third paradise, By Gerald Holton 47 Einstein’s Time, By Peter Galison 54 How Did Einstein Discover Relativity? By John Stachel 65 Einstein on the Photoelectric Effect, By David Cassidy 75 Einstein on Brownian Motion, By David Cassidy 78 An Albert Einstein Chronology 81 Einstein Chronology for 1905 83 Off the Net: Books on Einstein 85 More Einstein Info & Links 90 Einstein Site Contents 92 Exhibit Credits 93 http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/ Page 2 of 93 Einstein's parents, Hermann and Pauline, middle-class Germans.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Physical Chemistry and the Origins of Valency
    The physico-chemical nature of the chemical bond: valence bonding and the path of physico-chemical emergence by Martha Lynn Harris A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of the Institute for History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto © Martha Lynn Harris 2008 The physico-chemical nature of the chemical bond: valence bonding and the path of physico-chemical emergence Martha Lynn Harris Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Institute for History and Philosophy of Science and Technology University of Toronto Abstract Through the development of physical chemistry and chemical physics over the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries, the relationship between physics and chemistry changed to create a broad interdisciplinary framework in which chemists and physicists could make contributions to problems of common value. It is here argued that evolving disciplinary factors such as physical and chemical responses to the atomic hypothesis, the nature of disciplinary formation in Germany and the United States, the reception of quantum mechanics within physics and chemistry, and the application of quantum mechanics to the problem of chemical bonding by physicists and chemists, formed the chemical bond into a physico-chemical theory. In the late nineteenth-century context of early physical chemistry, the chemical bond was known as a physical link between atoms, which could not be studied by chemical means because of the lack of an adequate atomistic framework. Both chemists and physicists broadly accepted the atomistic hypothesis following the discovery of the electron at the turn of the twentieth century, which afforded theoretical study of chemical bonding.
    [Show full text]