DOCSLIB.ORG

ESTTA986068 07/08/2019 in the UNITED STATES PATENT and TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE the TRADEMARK TRIAL and APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ESTTA986068 07/08/2019 in the UNITED STATES PATENT and TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE the TRADEMARK TRIAL and APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 9 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA986068 Filing date: 07/08/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 92070514 Party Defendant JHO Intellectual Property Holdings, LLC Correspondence MARC J KESTEN Address 1600 NORTH PARK DRIVE WESTON, FL 33326 UNITED STATES [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 954-641-0570 EXT 293 Submission Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b) Filer's Name Erica W. Stump Filer's email [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Signature /ews/ Date 07/08/2019 Attachments JHO Motion to Dismiss SUPER CREATINE 7-8-19.pdf(3116559 bytes ) IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY, Petitioner, Cancellation No.: 92070514 v. Registration No.: 5,252,855 JHO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC., Trademark: SUPER CREATINE Registrant. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451 REGISTRANT’S CORRECTED MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER RULE 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF Registrant, JHO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC (“Registrant” or “JHO”), moves the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board” or “TTAB”) for an order dismissing the Petition for Cancellation (“Petition”) filed by Monster Energy Company (“Monster”) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the following grounds: (1) Monster lacks standing to make this Petition and (2) all claims against Registrant fail to plausibly allege a cause of action upon which relief may be granted. In support of its motion, Registrant submits the following: BACKGROUND On February 5, 2019, Monster filed a Petition for Cancellation against Registrant JHO seeking to cancel JHO’s U.S. trademark registration for the mark, SUPER CREATINE, U.S. Reg. No. 5,252,855 for “Dietary and nutritional supplements containing creatine; Dietary supplements 1 containing creatine; Nutritional supplements containing creatine; Nutritional drinks containing creatine” (hereinafter “Subject Registration”). As grounds for cancellation, Monster alleges that: (1) the Subject Registration is generic; (2) JHO and its affiliates knowingly used the federal registration symbol before the mark was registered; (3) JHO and its affiliate’s use of the mark in the BANG products is deceptive; (4) JHO did not have sufficient legal and exclusive use of the mark at the time it filed its application; and (5) JHO and its affiliates knowingly made fraudulent representations to the USPTO to obtain the Subject Registration. While denying the material allegations made by Monster as being baseless, without any merit, and most of all, fabricated and misleading, JHO hereby moves to dismiss the Petition on the grounds that Monster has no standing to bring this cancellation proceeding1. LEGAL STANDARD FOR MOTION TO DISMISS A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is a test of the sufficiency of the complaint. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc. v. SciMed Life Systems Inc., 988 F.2d 1157, 26 USPQ2d 1038, 1041 (Fed. Cir. 1993); Covidien LP v. Masimo Corp., 109 USPQ2d 1696, 1697 (TTAB 2014). For purposes of determining a motion to dismiss, all of the plaintiff’s well-pleaded allegations must be accepted as true, and the complaint must be construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc., 26 USPQ2d at 1041; Petroleos Mexicanos v. Intermix SA, 97 USPQ2d 1403, 1405 (TTAB 2010). Furthermore, “[u]nder the simplified notice pleading of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the allegations of a complaint should be construed liberally so as to do substantial justice.” Fair Indigo LLC v. Style Conscience, 85 USPQ2d 1536, 1538 (TTAB 2007). 1 This is not Monster’s first trademark action before the Board. The Board’s website lists well over 200 actions in which Monster is involved – all since 2018. 2 To survive a motion to dismiss, a plaintiff need only allege sufficient factual content that, if proved, would allow the Board to conclude, or to draw a reasonable inference, that (1) the plaintiff has standing to maintain the proceeding, and (2) a valid ground exists for denying the registration sought or for cancelling the involved registration. See Doyle v. Al Johnson’s Swedish Restaurant & Butik Inc., 101 USPQ2d 1780, 1782 (TTAB 2012) (citing Young v. AGB Corp., 152 F.3d 1377, 47 USPQ2d 1752, 1754 (Fed. Cir. 1998)); see also Lipton Indus., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co., 670 F.2d 1024, 213 USPQ 185, 187 (CCPA 1982). Further, a complaint “must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”’ Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). In particular, the plaintiff must allege well-pleaded factual matter and more than “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements,” to state a claim plausible on its face. Id. (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555). A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw a reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. See Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556-57. However, the plausibility standard does not require that a plaintiff set forth detailed factual allegations. Id. Rather, a plaintiff need only allege “enough factual matter … to suggest that [a claim is plausible]” and “raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. U.S., 594 F.3d 1346, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2010). MONSTER LACKS STANDING Standing is a threshold issue that must be proved in every inter partes case. Lipton, 213 USPQ at 189. In order to meet the standing requirement, a plaintiff need only show that it has a real interest; i.e., a personal stake, in the outcome of the proceeding. See Ritchie v. Simpson, 170 F.3d 1092, 50 USPQ2d 1023, 1026 (Fed. Cir. 1999); and Jewelers Vigilance Committee, Inc. v. 3 Ullenberg Corp., 823 F.2d 490, 2 USPQ2d 2012, 2023-24 (Fed. Cir. 1987). The purpose of the standing requirement, which is directed solely to the interest of the plaintiff, is to prevent litigation when there is no real controversy between the parties. In the case of a cancellation proceeding, the standing requirement has its basis in Section 14 of the Trademark Act, which provides, in relevant part, that “[a]ny person who believes that he is or will be damaged … by the registration of a mark upon the principal register” may file upon payment of the prescribed fee, a petition to cancel stating the grounds therefor. 15 U.S.C. § 1064. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, has enunciated a liberal threshold for determining standing, namely that a plaintiff must demonstrate that he possesses a “real interest” in a proceeding beyond that of a mere intermeddler, and “a reasonable basis for his belief of damage.” See Ritchie v. Simpson, 50 USPQ2d at 1025-26. A “real interest” is a “direct and personal stake” in the outcome of the proceeding. Id. at 1026. “The facts regarding standing … are part of a petitioner’s case and must be affirmatively proved. Accordingly, [petitioner] is not entitled to standing solely because of the allegations in its petition.” Lipton, 213 USPQ at 189. See also Ritchie, 50 USPQ2d at 1027. In its Petition, the extent of Monster’s damages allegations is “Petitioner Monster Energy (“Monster”) is being damaged and will continued to be damaged by the continued registration in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) of the mark “SUPER CREATINE” . .” (See the first paragraph of the first page of the Petition) and “For the reasons expressed herein, Monster is being damaged, and will continue to be damaged, by the Subject Registration.” (See ¶ 12 of the Petition). However, the Petition does not contain any other allegations pertaining to whether Monster has a personal stake in the outcome or how it will be damaged by the continued 4 registration of the Subject Registration2. For example, the Petition fails to allege that Monster has a pending U.S. trademark application that is being refused registration under Section 2(d) as a result of the Subject Registration. Tri-Star Marketing, LLC v. Nino Franco, Spumanti S.R.L., 84 USPQ2d 1912, 1914 (TTAB 2007). The Petition also fails to allege whether Monster is using or intends to SUPER CREATINE (Creatyl-L-Leucine) or any other creatine ingredient in its energy drink products. The are no such allegations because Monster has never used, nor does it intend to use any form of creatine in any of its so-called “energy drink” products. See Syngenta Crop Prot. Inc. v. Bio-Chek LLC, 90 USPQ2d 1112, 1118 (TTAB 2009). Moreover, Monster does not allege in its Petition any interest in the mark SUPER CREATINE, now or in the future. In fact, the chemical composition of SUPER CREATINE is presently covered by U.S. Patent No. 8,445,466. Thus, even if Monster wanted to use SUPER CREATINE, it couldn’t as it would violate U.S. Patent NO. 8,445,466 and JHO has no intention of licensing its U.S. patent covering SUPER CREATINE or its registered trademark to Monster. Further, Monster fails to allege in the Petition that it owns common law rights in the mark SUPER CREATINE. Benjamin J. Giersch v. Scripps Networks, Inc., 90 USPQ2d 1020, 1022 (TTAB 2009). Monster merely alleges that VPX’s use of the “SUPER CREATINE” mark with the federal registration symbol has “directly damaged, and will continue to damage Monster,” without any factual basis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENERGY DRINK Buyer’S Guide 2007
    ENERGY DRINK buyer’s guide 2007 DIGITAL EDITION SPONSORED BY: OZ OZ3UGAR&REE OZ OZ3UGAR&REE ,ITER ,ITER3UGAR&REE -ANUFACTUREDFOR#OTT"EVERAGES53! !$IVISIONOF#OTT"EVERAGES)NC4AMPA &, !FTERSHOCKISATRADEMARKOF#OTT"EVERAGES)NC 777!&4%23(/#+%.%2'9#/- ENERGY DRINK buyer’s guide 2007 OVER 150 BRANDS COMPLETE LISTINGS FOR Introduction ADVERTISING EDITORIAL 1123 Broadway 1 Mifflin Place The BEVNET 2007 Energy Drink Buyer’s Guide is a comprehensive compilation Suite 301 Suite 300 showcasing the energy drink brands currently available for sale in the United States. New York, NY Cambridge, MA While we have added some new tweaks to this year’s edition, the layout is similar to 10010 02138 our 2006 offering, where brands are listed alphabetically. The guide is intended to ph. 212-647-0501 ph. 617-715-9670 give beverage buyers and retailers the ability to navigate through the category and fax 212-647-0565 fax 617-715-9671 make the tough purchasing decisions that they believe will satisfy their customers’ preferences. To that end, we’ve also included updated sales numbers for the past PUBLISHER year indicating overall sales, hot new brands, and fast-moving SKUs. Our “MIA” page Barry J. Nathanson in the back is for those few brands we once knew but have gone missing. We don’t [email protected] know if they’re done for, if they’re lost, or if they just can’t communicate anymore. EDITORIAL DIRECTOR John Craven In 2006, as in 2005, niche-marketed energy brands targeting specific consumer [email protected] interests or demographics continue to expand. All-natural and organic, ethnic, EDITOR urban or hip-hop themed, female- or male-focused, sports-oriented, workout Jeffrey Klineman “fat-burners,” so-called aphrodisiacs and love drinks, as well as those risqué brand [email protected] names aimed to garner notoriety in the media encompass many of the offerings ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER within the guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankle Complex Musculature Adaptations After Energy Drinks Consumption in Healthy Young Adult
    4 International Journal of ijpefs212 PHYSICAL EDUCATION, FITNESS AND SPORTS RESEARCH ARTICLE RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE RESEARCH Ankle complex musculature adaptations after Energy Drinks 10.34256/ DOI: consumption in healthy young adult Martín G. Rosario PT, PhD, CSFI, ATRIC* , Clare Hanrahan SPT , Lauren Basye SPT and Ashley Correa SPT a Texas Woman’s University, School of Physical Therapy, Dallas, Texas *Corresponding author Ph: (214) 689-7712 ; Email: [email protected] DOI: https://doi.org/10.34256/ijpefs2124 Received: 15-03-2021, Revised: 12-04-2021; Accepted: 16-04-2021; Published: 27-04-2021 Abstract: Over the past few years, energy drink consumption has increased among students aged 18–34 years. Energy drinks alter the balance, reduce blood flow and interfere with neuromuscular activation in the lower extremities. We attempted to determine which specific additive of three different drinks (red bull, rockstar, and bang) could contribute to changes in muscle activation of the ankle complex. Twenty healthy young adults aged 22–28 years were included in this study and allocated among 3 groups, red bull, rockstar, and bang. Neuromuscular data were obtained from EMG sensors positioned on the anterior tibialis and gastrocnemius before completing the four balance tasks. Each participant completed all the tasks before and after the 16-ounce Edrink. ANOVA was performed to compare the data before and after the beverage. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05. A trend was observed in red bull and bang groups revealing a faster anterior tibial activity and prolong activation for gastrocnemius. The rockstar group also showed a more rapid activation trend and shorter response during all tasks for the gastrocnemius.
    [Show full text]
  • Analisis Perilaku Konsumen Untuk Strategi Pemasaran Minuman Kesehatan “Lipovitan”
    I. PENDAHULUAN 1.1. Latar Belakang Meningkatnya kesadaran untuk hidup sehat dan menjalankan aktivitas dengan tubuh yang bugar memicu munculnya gagasan produsen untuk me- nawarkan minuman kesehatan pada masyarakat Indonesia. Meskipun sam- pai saat ini belum ada definisi serta penggolongan minuman kesehatan seca- ra pasti dan jelas, dari segi bahan bakunya minuman kesehatan dapat dibagi menjadi dua kelompok, yaitu minuman kesehatan yang berbahan dasar air dan yang berbahan dasar susu skim. Berbagai jenis dan merek minuman kesehatan ditawarkan di pasar dengan promosi besar-besaran, baik melalui iklan di media cetak maupun media elektronik. Tidak seperti minuman ringan (soft drink) dan air minum dalam kemasan yang menawarkan kelebihannya untuk melepaskan da- haga, sebagian besar promosi minuman kesehatan berusaha mencipta- kan kesan minuman kesehatan sebagai lambang kekuatan dan vitalitas bagi peminumnya. Sejak minuman kesehatan pertama kali diperkenalkan di Indonesia sekitar pertengahan tahun 1980, pasar produk minuman kesehatan berkem- bang dengan pesat. Data konsumsi minuman kesehatan periode 1991 – 1997 yang dihimpun oleh Indocommercial dalam surveinya pada tahun 1998 menunjukkan perkembangan konsumsi rata-rata pertahun sebesar 69,07 %. Sedangkan, data konsumsi minuman kesehatan untuk tahun 1998 sampai dengan tahun 2002 terekam oleh A.C. Nielsen dengan pertumbuhan rata- rata sebesar 26,56 %. Data perkembangan konsumsi minuman kesehatan tersebut terlihat pada Tabel 1 dan Tabel 2. Tabel 1. Perkembangan Konsumsi Minuman Kesehatan di Indonesia Periode 1991 – 1997 Konsumsi Tahun Pertumbuhan (%/tahun) (liter) 1991 5.083.081 - 1992 10.579.182 108,13 1993 17.159.764 62,20 1994 29.723.523 73,22 1995 57.480.293 93,38 1996 91.154.467 58,58 1997 108.404.605 18,92 Rata-rata pertumbuhan konsumsi per tahun 69,07 Sumber data: Hasil Survei Indocommercial tahun 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation
    SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT Certain statements made in this presentation may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws, as amended, regarding the expectations of management with respect to our future operating results and other future events including revenues and profitability. Monster Beverage Corporation (the “Company”) cautions that these statements are based on management’s current knowledge and expectations and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of the control of the Company, that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from the statements made herein. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following: the direct and indirect impacts of the human and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as measures being taken or that may be taken in the future by governments, and consequently, businesses (including the Company and its suppliers, bottlers/distributors, co-packers and other service providers), and the public at large to limit the COVID-19 pandemic; the impact on consumer demand of the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Northern Hemisphere, resulting in a number of countries in Europe announcing expansive new regulations; the global slowing of growth and/or decline in sales of energy drinks including the convenience and gas channel (which is our largest channel), resulting from deteriorating economic conditions and financial uncertainties due to the COVID-19 pandemic; our ability
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Soft Drink Industry Acknowledgments
    BREAKING DOWN THE CHAIN: A GUIDE TO THE SOFT DRINK INDUSTRY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was developed to provide a detailed understanding of how the soft drink industry works, outlining the steps involved in producing, distributing, and marketing soft drinks and exploring how the industry has responded to recent efforts to impose taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages in particular. The report was prepared by Sierra Services, Inc., in collaboration with the Supply Chain Management Center (SCMC) at Rutgers University – Newark and New Brunswick. The authors wish to thank Kristen Condrat for her outstanding support in all phases of preparing this report, including literature review and identifying source documents, writing, data analysis, editing, and final review. Special thanks also goes to Susanne Viscarra, who provided copyediting services. Christine Fry, Carrie Spector, Kim Arroyo Williamson, and Ayela Mujeeb of ChangeLab Solutions prepared the report for publication. ChangeLab Solutions would like to thank Roberta Friedman of the Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity for expert review. For questions or comments regarding this report, please contact the supervising professors: Jerome D. Williams, PhD Prudential Chair in Business and Research Director – The Center for Urban Entrepreneurship & Economic Development (CUEED), Rutgers Business School – Newark and New Brunswick, Management and Global Business Department 1 Washington Park – Room 1040 Newark, NJ 07102 Phone: 973-353-3682 Fax: 973-353-5427 [email protected] www.business.rutgers.edu/CUEED Paul Goldsworthy Senior Industry Project Manager Department of Supply Chain Management & Marketing Sciences Rutgers Business School Phone: 908-798-0908 [email protected] Design: Karen Parry | Black Graphics The National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity (NPLAN) is a project of ChangeLab Solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fanta MM 20 Oz Deal
    - Fanta MM 20 oz Deal - Powerade September Promotion Watch Winners - Property Insurance & Safety and Security Seminar on November 20th, 2019 Beverage • Coffee • Pest Control • Chips • Propane • Other AAA Cigars Core-Mark Int. Monster Set Up – Contact TTA Office Larry Krebs Gillie Clayton (901) 850-8788 (901) 305-4647 (918)740-1324 AmeriGas Cooks Pest Control Pepsi & Gatorade - Memphis James Kerr Rachel Sanders Tom McClain (480) 665-7262 (901) 606-9132 (662)255-9971 Ajax Distributing Red Bull Pinnacle Propane Patrick Turner Randy Cox Customer Service (931) 249-1475 [email protected] (866)428-3427 ATM Link Frito Lay Security Enterprises Inc. Set Up – Contact TTA Office Set Up/Complaints Carolyn Canfield (901) 850-8788 – Contact the Office (901)383-2519 Caravan Packaging (901)850-8788 Turner Ice-cream Set Up – Contact TTA Office Jaydee Clifton (901) 850-8788 (901) 355-7436 Cintas US Foods Travis Adams Jimmy Cull (479) 459-4311 (901)230-4191 Coca Cola - Memphis Waste Connections Inc. Lonnie Coleman Veronica Karter (901)508-5071 (901) 331-7763 Please Call the office for any World Pay – CR Processor Complaints. Che Powell Comcast (678) 587-1450 Set Up – Contact TTA Office (901) 850-8788 Community Coffee Robert Hatcher 901-825-8695 If your complaint or request has not been resolved within 72 hours, please contact the Office: At (901) 850-8788 or E-mail us at [email protected] Memphis, MS, & AR Members 2019 NATA-TTA CMA Sparkling Beverage Space *SSD Beverage space requirement is 2:1 vs. Pepsi or 67% and in 1st Position 2 Door SSD sets will
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Wave of No-Alcohol Beverages in the US, 2020 Edition
    The Next Wave of No-Alcohol Beverages in the U.S. 2020 Edition (Published December 2020. Data through 2019.) More than 500 pages, with extensive text analysis. This report scrutinizes the always-changing marketplace by identifying and quantifying emerging non-alcoholic beverage For A Full categories, discussing companies of growing significance and Catalog of describing what could be the next big thing. New this year: Reports and Discussion of the impact of covid-19 on industry innovation and Databases, emerging brands. Go To bmcreports.com INSIDE: REPORT OVERVIEW AVAILABLE FORMAT & A brief discussion of this PRICING report’s key features. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Direct Download Word & PDF A detailed outline of this report’s contents and data $3,995 tables. 7 To learn more, to place an advance order or to inquire about SAMPLE TEXT AND additional user licenses call: Charlene Harvey +1 212.688.7640 INFOGRAPHICS ext. 1962 [email protected] Examples of report text, data content, layout and style. 17 HAVE Contact Charlene Harvey: 212-688-7640 x 1962 QUESTIONS? [email protected] Beverage Marketing Corporation 850 Third Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10022 Tel: 212-688-7640 Fax: 212-826-1255 The answers you need In an industry where innovation is a constant, this report provides in-depth analysis of ways innovation is changing the beverage landscape through the emergence of new categories and brands. It also provides an overview of defining trends spurring developments in new categories. It also looks at the fast-growing liquid refreshment beverage companies, discusses their performance and indicates what makes them noteworthy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS I am pleased to report that 2018 represented our 26th consecutive record year of increased gross sales. Net sales rose to $3.8 billion in 2018 from $3.4 billion in 2017. Gross sales rose to $4.4 billion in 2018 from $3.9 billion in 2017. We continue to innovate in the energy drink category and following successful launches earlier this year, we anticipate future introductions of new and exciting beverages and packaging. In particular, in March 2019, we successfully launched Reign Total Body Fuel™, our new line of performance energy drinks. In 2018 and 2019, we continued to transition a number of domestic and international geographies to the system bottlers of The Coca-Cola Company. Our Monster Energy® drinks are now sold in approximately 142 countries and territories globally and our Strategic Brands, comprised of various energy drink brands we acquired from The Coca-Cola Company in 2015, are now sold in approximately 96 countries and territories globally. One or more of our energy drinks are now distributed in approximately 155 countries and territories worldwide. Our Monster Energy® brand participates in the premium segment of the energy drink category in numerous countries as do our Strategic Brands. Our affordable energy brand, notably Predator®, participates in the affordable segment of the energy drink category internationally. Norman C. Epstein, Harold C. Taber, Jr. and Kathy N. Waller are retiring from the Board of Directors effective as of the 2019 Annual Meeting and are not standing for re-election. Mr. Epstein and Mr. Taber have both served on the Board of Directors since 1992, and Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Monster Energy Company
    Monster Energy Company Jacob Masek Bryce Reagan Alison Dyn Anh Nguyen 1 April 10, 2016 Dr. Neil Gilchrist Business Administration School of Business Truman State University Kirksville, MO 63501 Dear Dr. Gilchrist: We deliver to you the Major Case Analysis report on Monster Energy Company, the main subsidiary of Monster Beverage Corporation. This semester long assignment was to select a firm, discover the major problem they are dealing with, and create a plan to get past this problem. We wrote this analysis for both company insiders and for people who have never heard about Monster Energy, including our classmates. After peer editing of the original draft, we are happy for you to enjoy this final draft for you to analyze and enjoy. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Bryce Reagan Jacob Masek Alison Dyn Anh Nguyen 2 Table of Contents List of Exhibits 3 Executive Summary 4 Company History 8 Corporate Mission and Current Strategy 10 Industry Analysis 11 Marketing Analysis 15 Financial Analysis 23 SWOT 29 Major Problems 35 Possible Solutions 35 Selection and Justification of Best Solution 39 Implementation Plans and Contingency Plans 41 Bibliography 43 Appendix 1 ­ Financial Statements 45 Appendix 2 – Stock Chart 48 Appendix 3­ Soft Drink Industry Comparison 49 3 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1: Soft Drink Industry Financial Comparison Exhibit 2: Monster Energy Income Statement Exhibit 3: Monster Energy Free Cash Flow Sheet Exhibit 4: Monster Energy Balance Sheet 4 Executive Summary Overview Our objective in this paper is to research Monster Energy, the main subsidiary of Monster Beverage Corporation, and analyze the entire company as well as defining their major problem.
    [Show full text]
  • AMSTERDAM DISTRICT COURT Private Law Division, Preliminary
    In the name of the King • judgment AMSTERDAM DISTRICT COURT Private law division, preliminary relief court, civil-law section case number / cause-list number: C/13/662800 / KG ZA 19-215 AB/MV Judgment in preliminary relief proceedings of 09 May 2019 in the matter of: the company incorporated under Irish law MONSTER ENERGY LIMITED, with its official seat in Dublin, Ireland, claimant by identical writs of summons dated 29 March 2019, counsel: B.J. Berghuis van Woortman and P.L. Tjiam, practising in Amsterdam, versus 1. the company incorporated under foreign law VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., trading as VPX Sports, with its official seat in Weston, Florida (United States), 2. the private limited-liability company BANG ENERGY B.V., with its corporate seat in Sittard, 3. JOHN HENRY OWOC, residing in Davie, Florida (United States), counsel for defendants 1 to 3 G.S.P. Vos, practising in Amsterdam, 4. the company incorporated under foreign law LUCKYVITAMIN LLC, with its official seat in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania (United States), counsel R. Chalmers Hoynck van Papendrecht, practising in Breda, 5. the company incorporated under foreign law PREDATOR NUTRITION ONLINE LIMITED, with its official seat in Wakefield, West Yorkshire (United Kingdom), not having appeared, defendants. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as Monster, VPX, Bang B.V., Owoc, LuckyVitamin and Predator. VPX and Bang B.V. will also be referred to collectively (in the singular) as Bang. 1. The proceedings At the hearing of 18 April 2019, Monster has argued and claimed in accordance with the writ of summons, a copy of which is attached to this judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Drinks May Improve Postural Sway While Provoking an Early Onset of Muscle Fatigue Journal of Public Health Issues And
    Correa, A., et al. (2021). J Pub Health Issue Pract, 5(1): 176 https://doi.org/10.33790/jphip1100176 Journal of Public Health Issues and Practices Energy Drinks May Improve Postural Sway While Provoking an Early Onset of Muscle Fatigue Ashley Correa SPT, Clare Hanrahan SPT, Lauren Basye SPT & Martín G. Rosario* PT, PhD, CSFI, ATRIC School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Dallas Campus; 5500 Southwestern Medical Ave. Dallas, United States. Article Details Article Type: Research Article Received date: 16th January, 2021 Accepted date: 29th March, 2021 Published date: 19th April, 2021 Corresponding Author: Martín G. Rosario PT, PhD, CSFI, ATRIC, Assistant Professor, School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Dallas Campus; 5500 Southwestern Medical Ave. Dallas, TX 75235-72. United States. E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Correa, A., Hanrahan, C, Basye, L., & Rosario, M.G. (2021). Energy Drinks May Improve Postural Sway While Provoking an Early Onset of Muscle Fatigue. J Pub Health Issue Pract 5(1): 176. doi: https://doi.org/10.33790/jphip1100176 Copyright: ©2021, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Introduction Background: In recent years, energy drink consumption (EDC) Energy drinks (EDs) are beverages that are proclaimed to be has flared up among college students in the 18-34-year-old male capable of enhancing athletic performance, concentration, reaction demographic. Energy drinks cause balance alterations, reduction of time, and basal metabolic rate besides enhancing energy levels [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Sugary Drink Marketing to Youth: Some Progress but Much Room to Improve Methods
    Sugary drink marketing to youth: Some progress but much room to improve Methods Sugary Drink FACTS 2014 Some progress but much room for improvement in marketing to youth Authors: Jennifer L. Harris, PhD, MBA Marlene B. Schwartz, PhD Megan LoDolce, MA Christina Munsell, MS, RD Frances Fleming-Milici, PhD James Elsey, MS Sai Liu, MPH Maia Hyary, MPA Renee Gross, JD Carol Hazen, MS Cathryn Dembek, MBA Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity November, 2014 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their valuable assistance in collecting data and preparing the report: Colleen Flynn Amy Heard Sarah Maver Kelsey O'Brien Natalia Perelman Katherine Rich Solomon Gazara Thank you to our colleagues at the Rudd Center, especially Megan Orciari, Patrick Mustain, and Tricia Wynne. We thank Cavich Creative, LLC and Chris Lenz for their assistance in preparing the report and the website. Finally, we thank the leadership and staff at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, with special thanks to Tina Kauh, Susan Promislo and the entire Childhood Obesity Team. Support for this project was provided by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Table of Contents List of Tables...................................................................................iv Ranking Tables .................................................................................v Appendix Tables ................................................................................v List of Figures . v Executive Summary .............................................................................6
    [Show full text]