Active BMI Sites
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Baltimore Region's Annual Listing of Obligated Projects
The Baltimore Region’s Annual Listing of Obligated Projects for FY 2018 The information in the Baltimore Region’s Annual Listing of provisions, the United States Department of Transportation (US Obligated Projects for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 was compiled from DOT) on May 27, 2016, issued its Final Ruling in the Federal Register data provided by the Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA) (FHWA (23 CFR Parts 450 and 771) and FTA (49 CFR Part 613)) on and the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA). The Federal Statewide Transportation Planning / Metropolitan Transportation Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Planning. This ruling included Section 450.334, the Annual Listing Administration (FTA) expect that the projects included in the of Obligated Projects requirement. The May 2016 Final Ruling will Annual Listing of Obligated Projects are consistent with the remain in effect until the US DOT issues new final regulatory categories of projects that are listed in the Transportation guidance for the FAST Act. Improvement Program (TIP). The annual listing of obligated This document lists all transportation projects in the Baltimore projects contain only funded obligations. The intent of this list is to region that were obligated in state fiscal year 2018 for the period of improve the transparency of transportation spending decisions to July 1, 2017 - June 30, 2018. FHWA defines obligation as “[t]he the public by providing information about funds requested and federal government’s legal commitment (promise) to pay or obligated by either FHWA or FTA toward a project included in the reimburse the states or other entities for the federal share of a Baltimore region’s TIP. -
1990 Annual Report
Boker Hughes lncorporoted ,::::.r;:r:;rr:::;::::rrrrr; its operations with the envi- ronment while supplying high quolity products and services to the customers it serves. The Compony jrmly ond seriously occepts its sociol Environmentol fo" rhe cover responsibility to work with the Objectives A Hughes drill bit "going in the hole." The public, the government ond standard by which all others are measured, others to develop and to use Hughes drill bit technology is but one of noturol resources in on envi- Baker Hughes' leading technologies. ronmentally sound monner while protecting the health and saJety oJ our employees and the public. Tb meet these responsibi liries, t he C om pany fc p o r a t e P r oJi I e ond its subsidiories commit " " Baker Hughes lncorporated provides prod- to the Joll ow ing o pe ro tional ucts and services the and principols: to petroleum con- tinuous process industries. Twenty-seven divisions operate through three major To recognize community con- groups: Baker Hughes Production Tools. cerns about the methods in Baker Hughes Drilling Equipment and which we use our row moteri- Baker Hughes Process Technologies. als, products and operations; To make soJety, heolth and envi ro nme n tal co nsid e ra ti o ns o prioritv in our plonning ond development oJ new products fdint"nt, ond processes; l. Financial Highlights To operote our plonts ond 2. Letter to Stockholders .locilities ond to handle our 4. Operations Revier.r, row materials ond products in r5. Financial Review a monner which is consistent 2t. Financial Statements with prudent environmentol, 48. -
2020 Pharmacy Directory
2020 Part D Model Pharmacy Directory KeyCare Advantage (HMO I-SNP) 2020 Pharmacy Directory This pharmacy directory was updated on 2/17/2020. For more recent information or other questions, please contact KeyCare Advantage (HMO I-SNP) Member Services at (844) 206-1205 or, for TTY users, 711, Hours of Operation: 8a.m. to 8 p.m., seven days a week (except Thanksgiving and Christmas) from October 1 through March 31 and Monday to Friday (except holidays) from April 1 through September 30, or visit KeyCareAdvantage.com. Changes to our pharmacy network may occur during the benefit year. An updated Pharmacy Directory is located on our website at KeyCareAdvantage.com. You may also call Member Services for updated provider. May 2019 1 H6959_2020PharmDirec_C 2020 Part D Model Pharmacy Directory Introduction This booklet provides a list of KeyCare Advantage (HMO I-SNP)’s network pharmacies. To get a complete description of your prescription coverage, including how to fill your prescriptions, please review the Evidence of Coverage and KeyCare Advantage ( HMO I-SNP)’s formulary. We call the pharmacies on this list our “network pharmacies” because we have made arrangements with them to provide prescription drugs to Plan members. In most cases, your prescriptions are covered under KeyCare Advantage (HMO I-SNP) only if they are filled at a network pharmacy [or through our mail order pharmacy service]. Once you go to one pharmacy, you are not required to continue going to the same pharmacy to fill your prescription but can switch to any other of our network pharmacies. We will fill prescriptions at non-network pharmacies under certain circumstances as described in your Evidence of Coverage. -
2010 ANNUAL REPORT Boston 5 Middlesex Avenue, Suite 401 Somerville, MA 02145 T 617.684.1500 F 617.623.3601
LOCATIONS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1626 East Jefferson Street Rockville, MD 20852-4041 Scan this code t 301.998.8100 with your phone f 301.998.3700 to see more. Federal Realty Investment Trust Download the i-nigma app to REGIONAL OFFICES get started. POISED 2010 ANNUAL REPORT Boston 5 Middlesex Avenue, Suite 401 Somerville, MA 02145 t 617.684.1500 f 617.623.3601 Philadelphia 50 East Wynnewood Road, Suite 200 Wynnewood, PA 19096 t 610.896.5870 f 610.896.5876 San Jose 3055 Olin Avenue, Suite 2100 San Jose, CA 95128-2069 t 408.551.4600 f 408.551.4616 South Florida 7015 Beracasa Way, Suite 204 Boca Raton, FL 33433 t 561.347.6522 f 561.368.6223 federalrealty.com 98454_Cvr 1 3/10/11 3:02 PM THE SHOPS AT EASTGATE Chapel Hill, NC Lisa collaborates with Planimetron and HZDG on Federal Realty’s website and online leasing tools. It starts with the proper stance: a firm financial footing, the result of our prudent and thoughtful investment approach. Drawing on decades of experience, we target our efforts at owning, operating, developing, and redeveloping high-quality retail real estate, serving markets with dense BOARD OF TRUSTEES populations, strong household incomes, and high barriers to entry by competitors. We remain focused on the long term. It is precisely this poised, (TOP, FROM LEFT) Jon E. Bortz, Chairman and CEO, Pebblebrook Hotel Trust balanced approach that created a healthy balance sheet and one of the David W. Faeder, Managing Partner, Fountain Square Properties lowest costs of capital in the industry. -
__History of Kew Depot and It's Routes
HISTORY OF KEW DEPOT AND ITS ROUTES Page 1 HISTORY of KEW DEPOT and the ROUTES OPERATED by KEW Compiled and written by Hugh Waldron MCILT CA 1500 The word tram and tramway are derived from Scottish words indicating the type of truck and the tracks used in coal mines. 1807 The first Horse tram service in the world commences operation between Swansea and Mumbles in Wales. 12th September 1854 At 12.20 pm first train departs Flinders Street Station for Sandridge (Port Melbourne) First Steam operated railway line in Australia. The line is eventually converted to tram operation during December 1987 between the current Southbank Depot and Port Melbourne. The first rail lines in Australia operated in Newcastle Collieries operated by horses in 1829. Then a five-mile line on the Tasman Peninsula opened in 1836 and powered by convicts pushing the rail vehicle. The next line to open was on 18/5/1854 in South Australia (Goolwa) and operated by horses. 1864 Leonard John Flannagan was born in Richmond. After graduating he became an Architect and was responsible for being the Architect building Malvern Depot 1910, Kew Depot 1915 and Hawthorn Depot 1916. He died 2nd November 1945. September 1873 First cable tramway in the world opens in Clay Street, San Francisco, USA. 1877 Steam tramways commence. Victoria only had two steam tramways both opened 1890 between Sorrento Pier to Sorrento Back Beach closed on 20th March 1921 (This line also operated horse trams when passenger demand was not high.) and Bendigo to Eaglehawk converted to electric trams in 1903. -
Maryland Through 2011
1 LIHTC Properties in Maryland through 2011 Annual Low Rent or Tax- Zip Nonprofit Allocation Allocated Year Placed Total Income Income Exempt Project Name Address City State Code Sponsor Year Amount in Service Construction Type Units Units Ceiling Credit Percentage Bond 2323 Maryland Llc 2323 Maryland Ave Baltimore MD 21218 No 1993 1995 Acquisition And Rehab 11 11 60% AMGI Both 30% and 70% No 9 South Chapel Street 9 S Chapel St Baltimore MD 21231 Yes 1994 1996 Acquisition And Rehab 1 1 60% AMGI Both 30% and 70% No Admiral Oaks Apts. 445 Captains Cir Ste C Annapolis MD 21401 No 1990$ 1,386,987 2010 Acquisition And Rehab 159 159 60% AMGI 70 % present value No Affinity Old Post Apartments 101 Hanover St Aberdeen MD 21001 Not Indicated 177 177 60% AMGI Not Indicated Ahepa Senior Apartments 1351 S Clinton St Baltimore MD 21224 Yes 2001 2002 New Construction 57 56 50% AMGI 70 % present value No Aigburth Vale Senior Commnity 212 Aigburth Rd Towson MD 21286 No 1999 2000 Acquisition And Rehab 70 70 60% AMGI 70 % present value No Airpark Apartments 8511 Snouffer School Rd Gaithersburg MD 20879 No 2003$ 462,627 2006 New Construction 106 106 30 % present value Yes Airpark Apts 8511 Snouffer School Rd Gaithersburg MD 20879 No 2003 2005 New Construction 106 106 30 % present value Yes Albemarle Square 120 S Central Ave Baltimore MD 21202 Not Indicated 124 124 50% AMGI Not Indicated Albemarle Square Ii 120 S Central Ave Baltimore MD 21202 Not Indicated 58 58 50% AMGI Not Indicated Alcott Place 2702 Keyworth Ave Baltimore MD 21215 1989 1990 Not Indicated -
ABSTRACT Title of Document: [Re]Integrating the Stadium
ABSTRACT Title of Document: [Re]integrating the Stadium Within the City: A Ballpark for Downtown Tampa Justin Allen Cullen Master of Architecture, 2012 Directed By: Professor Garth C. Rockcastle, FAIA Architecture With little exception, Major League Baseball stadiums across the country deprive their cities of valuable space when not in use. These stadiums are especially wasteful if their resource demands are measured against their utilization. Baseball stadiums are currently utilized for only 13% of the total hours of each month during a regular season. Even though these stadiums provide additional uses for their audiences (meeting spaces, weddings, birthdays, etc.) rarely do these events aid the facility’s overall usage during a year. This thesis explores and redevelops the stadium’s interstitial zone between the street and the field. The primary objective is to redefine this zone as a space that functions for both a ballpark and as part of the urban fabric throughout the year. [RE]INTEGRATING THE STADIUM WITHIN THE CITY: A BALLPARK FOR DOWNTOWN TAMPA By Justin Allen Cullen Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture 2012 Advisory Committee: Professor Garth C. Rockcastle, Chair Assistant Professor Powell Draper Professor Emeritus Ralph D. Bennett Glenn R. MacCullough, AIA © Copyright by Justin Allen Cullen 2012 Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my family and friends who share my undying interest in our nation’s favorite pastime. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my parents and my fiancé, Kiley Wilfong, for their love and support during this six-and-a-half year journey. -
An Analysis of the American Outdoor Sport Facility: Developing an Ideal Type on the Evolution of Professional Baseball and Football Structures
AN ANALYSIS OF THE AMERICAN OUTDOOR SPORT FACILITY: DEVELOPING AN IDEAL TYPE ON THE EVOLUTION OF PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL AND FOOTBALL STRUCTURES DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Chad S. Seifried, B.S., M.Ed. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Donna Pastore, Advisor Professor Melvin Adelman _________________________________ Professor Janet Fink Advisor College of Education Copyright by Chad Seifried 2005 ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to analyze the physical layout of the American baseball and football professional sport facility from 1850 to present and design an ideal-type appropriate for its evolution. Specifically, this study attempts to establish a logical expansion and adaptation of Bale’s Four-Stage Ideal-type on the Evolution of the Modern English Soccer Stadium appropriate for the history of professional baseball and football and that predicts future changes in American sport facilities. In essence, it is the author’s intention to provide a more coherent and comprehensive account of the evolving professional baseball and football sport facility and where it appears to be headed. This investigation concludes eight stages exist concerning the evolution of the professional baseball and football sport facility. Stages one through four primarily appeared before the beginning of the 20th century and existed as temporary structures which were small and cheaply built. Stages five and six materialize as the first permanent professional baseball and football facilities. Stage seven surfaces as a multi-purpose facility which attempted to accommodate both professional football and baseball equally. -
Star Transit Transit Development Plan: Fiscal Years 2010
SSTTAARR TTRRAANNSSIITT TTRRAANNSSIITT DDEEVVEELLOOPPMMEENNTT PPLLAANN:: FFIISSCCAALL YYEEAARRSS 22001100 –– 22001155 Prepared for: Prepared by: Under contract to: November 2009 Contents 1.0 STAR TRANSIT SYSTEM OVERVIEW ................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 History ........................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Governance ................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Organizational Structure ............................................................................................... 1‐3 1.4 Transit Services Provided and Areas Served ................................................................. 1‐4 1.5 Fare Structure ................................................................................................................ 1‐9 1.6 Fleet ............................................................................................................................. 1‐10 1.7 Existing Facilities .......................................................................................................... 1‐10 1.8 Transit Security Program ............................................................................................. 1‐11 1.9 Public Outreach ........................................................................................................... 1‐11 2.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND STANDARDS ........................................................................... -
Annual Enforcement & Compliance Report
Maryland Department of the Environment ANNUAL ENFORCEMENT & COMPLIANCE REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 Larry Hogan Boyd K. Rutherford Ben Grumbles Horacio Tablada Governor Lieutenant Governor Secretary Deputy Secretary TABLE OF CONTENTS Section One – REPORT BASIS AND SUMMARY INFORMATION 3 Statutory Authority and Scope 4 Organization of the Report 4 MDE Executive Summary 5 MDE Performance Measures – Executive Summary 6 Enforcement Workforce 6 Section 1-301(d) Penalty Summary 7 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 1998 – 2004 8 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 2005 – 2010 9 MDE Performance Measures Historical Annual Summary FY 2011 – 2017 10 MDE Enforcement Actions Historical Annual Summary FY 1998 – 2017 11 MDE Penalties Historical Annual Summary Chart FY 1998 - 2017 11 MDE’s Enforcement and Compliance Process and Services to Permittees 12 and Businesses The Enforcement and Compliance Process 12 Enforcement Process Flow Chart 13 Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs) 14 Contacts or Consultations with Businesses 15 Compliance Assistance 15 Consultations with Businesses 15 Section Two - ADMINISTRATION DETAILS 17 Measuring Enforcement and Compliance 18 Performance Measures Table Overview and Definitions 19 Enforcement and Compliance Performance Measures Table Format 23 Air and Radiation Administration (ARA) 25 ARA Executive Summary 26 ARA Performance Measures 27 Ambient Air Quality Control 28 Air Quality Complaints 34 Asbestos 38 Radiation Machines 42 Radioactive Materials Licensing and Compliance 46 Land -
Chapter 3 Transportation
Chapter 3 Transportation Overview The movement of people and goods is an important concern to the Town of North East, making the Transportation element especially significant. Providing a safe and efficient transportation network with minimal disruption can sometimes be difficult to achieve. The Transportation element must be closely coordinated with other elements of the Plan to ensure that transportation plans and policies complement and promote those of other sections. The North East Municipal Growth Element identifies suitable areas for municipal expansion and establishes a two-tiered priority for growth and development. Those priority areas and the uses identified for those tracts combine to determine where additional study and evaluation of existing and future transportation capacity should be focused. The goals and objectives listed below provide guidance regarding the Town’s desire to enhance the safety, convenience, and functionality of existing facilities and future system expansions and improvements. Building upon the goals and policies in the 1992 Economic Growth, Resource Protection, and Planning Act, more recent State legislation1 addressed priorities for public investments in infrastructure; linking infrastructure capacity to priorities for targeted future growth; and expanded planning visions that address quality of life, sustainability, public participation and community design. A package of Bills, collectively known as the Smart and Sustainable Growth Act of 2009, strengthened required consistency between Plan content and implementation ordinances. The 2009 Act requires documentation about local efforts to address Plan goals and implementation of the twelve Planning Visions through revised annual reporting to the Maryland Department of Planning (MDP) on a uniform set of smart growth measures and indicators. -
The Omegan Voice of the Second District
New York New Jersey Pennsylvania Delaware Maryland The omegan Voice of the Second District InsideInside ThisThis Issue:Issue CorridorErmon VJones MemorialMemoriam Service Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, at West Point 68th Second District Dr. ConferenceJames Bethea $ Million Grant Omegas CBC FatherhoodOmega Men Reception On The Move Omega at Grand OpeningOmega Chapterof National MusemnArticles of African American History and Iota EpsilonCulture Articles Physicians Corner 2013-14 Second DistrictSecond Executive District ShirtsleeveCouncil Conference SuspensionsOpinion/ & ExpulsionsEditorial Section Omega Chapter Articles Grand Basileus Antonio F. Knox, Sr. Grand Basileus AntonioDistrict F.Representative Knox, Sr. Milton Harrison District Representative ShermanDistrict Public L. Charles Relations Zanes E. Cypress, Jr. District Public Relations Zanes E. Cypress, Jr. Fall Edition 2016 Friendship Is Essential To The Soul The Omegan Voice of the Second District The Mighty Second District - Home of 39th Grand Basileus Dr. Andrew A. Ray THE OMEGAN “ Voice of the Second District” EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Milton D. Harrison EDITOR IN CHIEF Zanes E. Cypress, Jr. SENIOR COPY EDITOR Eric “Moby” Brown COPY EDITORS Grand Keeper of Records and Seal James Alexander M. Dante’ Brown Kenneth Rodgers Leroy Finch Demaune A. Millard Rev. Stephen M. Smith Jereleigh A. Archer, Jr. CHIEF PHOTOGRAPHER Jamal Parker STAFF PHOTOGRAPHERS Fitz Devonish Lamonte Tyler PUBLISHING MANAGERS Roy Wesley, Jr. Grand Counselor D. Michael Lyles, Esq. Jeff Spratley The OMEGAN is the Official Organ of the Second District of the Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc. The Second Dis- trict is comprised of the Great States of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland, It publishes three editions annually, Fall, Winter and Conference Editions, for the Members of the Second District and is widely distributed Internationally throughout all Twelve Districts of the Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc.