March 2017 • Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

March 2017 • Vol Published by the American Physiological Society – Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism THEPHYSIOLOGIST 90th President of APS March 2017 • Vol. 60/No. 2 Dennis Brown A Matter of Opinion In my role as the Director of the Office of Research Career Development (ORCD) at the The Times They Are Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), I find myself giving individualized advice to A-Changin’ scientists ranging from postdoctoral fellows First, let me apologize to Bob Dylan right up to the full professor level. One of for using the title of his classic song for my recommendations is that a person should this article. However, it is important to continually challenge him-/herself to do note that the “Times Are A-Changin” something new to avoid stagnation and to open for APS and physiology. Change is Dennis Brown up new areas of opportunity. So, despite some important, and it serves to challenge us misgivings (see below), I listened to my own as individuals and forces organizations advice and agreed to have my name placed on the ballot for the APS to adapt in order to move forward. In Presidency. I sincerely thank the APS membership and leadership for the case of the Society, change will help their confidence in me, and it goes without saying that I will do my us to revise and restructure our efforts very best to help the society increase its influence and standing as real in order to strengthen the Society and science struggles to be heard and respected in this “post-truth” era. (If the discipline. you have not heard this phrase before, Google it.) Change was the driving force in our So, given the opportunity to be the President of such an important decision in 1995 to work to convert the and eminent society, what went through my mind, and why did I have FASEB meeting into the Experimental some hesitation before accepting? I have been a member of the APS Biology (Duling B. The Experimental for over two decades and had been active in various aspects of the Biology Meeting: it’s our meeting. Society, most notably in publications, for several years even before The Physiologist 38: 3-4, 1995). paying my annual dues. My first appointment was as an Editorial Board Member of AJP-Renal in 1987, soon after coming to the U.S. from Geneva, Switzerland, where I had worked for 10 years. Because the Continued on page 76 next year promises to be very interesting as I juggle my last year as Editor-in-Chief of Physiological Reviews with the Presidency after the EB meeting in April, I sought opinions on the potential work load from THIS ISSUE: colleagues who were past presidents not only of the APS but also of 67 On Mentorship, Perseverance, other societies. One of my Presidential colleagues here at MGH told me and Generosity that it all depends on the quality of the staff. Well, as we all know, the APS staff is outstanding, and their directors are second to none in any 78 Report from the Bodil professional society. This insight, therefore, went a long way toward Schmidt-Nielsen Honorary assuring me that my task would be possible. In addition, I suspected Symposium that at some time in the not-so-distant future – perhaps as I sat in my rocking chair sipping a glass of Ensure through a straw – I would very 110 A. Clifford Barger much regret not stepping up to the plate to assume this leadership Underrepresented Minority position in a society that has been very much a home for me for most Mentorship Awardee of my professional life. Serving on Council for 3 years from 2011-2014 FASEB Launches Model helped to show me how the Society worked, what issues it dealt with, 125 Organism Database and the many ways in which it supported not only the discipline of Continued on page 70 the-aps.org Published by the American Physiological Society – Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism THEPHYSIOLOGIST Published bimonthly and distributed by The American Physiological Society 9650 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20814-3991 Contents ISSN 0031-9376 90th President of APS .............................65 Education Martin Frank – Editor and Executive Director 2017 Bodil M. Schmidt-Nielsen The Times They Are A-Changin’ ..............65 Distinguished Mentor and Jane Reckelhoff – President Scientists Awardee ................................... 110 Patricia E. Molina – Past President 2017 A. Clifford Barger Mentoring Forum Dennis Brown – President-Elect Underrepresented Minority On Mentorship, Perseverance, and Mentorship Awardee ............................... 110 Generosity ................................................... 67 Councillors National Research Mentoring Barbara T. Alexander, David D. Gutterman, Network Professional Development Lisa R. Leon, Rudy M. Ortiz, Jennifer Pollock, APS News Offerings ................................................... 111 Willis Samson, Harold Schultz, Irene C. Solomon, Report from the Bodil Schmidt-Nielsen APS Undergraduate Sessions at Bill J. Yates Honorary Symposium ................................ 78 EB 2017 ..................................................... 113 2016 Donors & Sponsors ........................... 81 APS Physiology Video Contest ............... 114 Ex Officio Dennis Brown, Martin Frank, Patricia E. Molina, Jane F. Reckelhoff, Rita Scheman Chapter News Membership The 21st Annual Meeting of the Iowa New Regular Members ............................ 115 Publications Committee: Physiological Society ................................. 87 New Graduate Student Members .......... 117 Chair: Curt D. Sigmund Ohio Physiological Society Meeting Undergraduate Student Members ......... 120 Members: Catherine E. Carr, David H. Ellison, 31st Annual Meeting .................................. 89 Andrew S. Greene, Paul A. Insel, Lysette K. Affiliate Members ..................................... 121 The Third Annual Meeting of the Greater Rogers, Loren E. Wold Washington Chapter of the American Director of Publications: Rita Scheman Physiological Society ................................. 92 Publications APS Journals to Move to New Design and Layout: Hosting Platform ...................................... 122 Allen Wayne, Ltd. ACDP Association of Chairs of Departments of Current Calls for Papers ........................... 123 Subscriptions: Distributed to members as part Physiology 2016 Leadership of their membership. Nonmembers in the USA Retreat Highlights ...................................... 95 Science Policy (print only): individuals $115.00; institutions FASEB Launches Model Organism $220.00. Nonmembers international: individuals Database ................................................... 125 $170.00; institutions $270.00. Single copies and People and Places back issues when available, subscriber $30.00 Chris Kevil Named Vice Chancellor Spanish Military Brings Research each; nonsubscriber $60.00 each. Subscribers for Research at LSU Health Shreveport .... 98 Mice to Canary Islands ............................. 126 to The Physiologist also receive abstracts of David A. Brown Named Associate Congress Passes Flurry of the Conferences of the American Physiological Professor at Virginia Tech .......................... 98 Last-Minute Legislation ........................... 127 Society. The online version is available free to all Election Results .......................................... 98 worldwide. Book Reviews The American Physiological Society assumes no Experimental Biology Lucky Choices: The Story of My Life responsibility for the statements and opinions Experimental Biology 2017 in Sciences ................................................ 128 advanced by contributors to The Physiologist. Distinguished Lectures .............................. 99 Upcoming EB Symposia .......................... 101 Positions Available ................................130 Please notify the APS Membership Experimental Biology 2017...................... 103 Department as soon as possible if you change your address or telephone number. Meetings and Congresses .....................136 Headquarters phone: 301-634-7118 Fax: 301-634-7241 Email: [email protected] http://www.the-aps.org Printed in the USA 66 • Vol. 60/No. 2 | March 2017 THEPHYSIOLOGIST Mentoring Forum On Mentorship, Perseverance, and Generosity Ormond A. MacDougald John A Faulkner Collegiate Professor of Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Michigan My approach to mentorship, How to mentor is a more difficult question to address, lab management, and career and what follows are a few of my thoughts on this development reflects not only subject, some of which I hope will resonate with you. my ideals but also the influence Although I’ve written this essay in the context of of many individuals during my running a lab, most of the suggestions are applicable training, and lessons learned to broader contexts. When I think about the skills and from my trainees. The most habits associated with mentoring, many of these can be significant figure in this regard attributed to common sense; however, it’s a little like my was my postdoctoral advisor, experience reading books on financial planning or time Ormond A. MacDougald M. Daniel Lane. As detailed in management – simply reading about them periodically an In Memoriam written by Lane and having them in mind helps to keep me doing the lab trainees (Mandrup et al. In memoriam: M. Daniel right thing and from slipping into bad habits such as Lane, 1930-2014. Trends Endocrinol Metab 25: 437-439, getting “too busy” to spend time with my trainees. 2014.), “Dan was a fantastic mentor who set a great and inspiring
Recommended publications
  • Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance Of
    Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance of United States Nobel Prize Winners in Science: Irrefutable Data and Exemplary Family Narratives—Backup Data and Information Andrew A. Beveridge, Queens and Graduate Center CUNY and Social Explorer, Inc. Lynn Caporale, Strategic Scientific Advisor and Author The following slides were presented at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This project and paper is an outgrowth of that session, and will combine qualitative data on Nobel Prize Winners family histories along with analyses of the pattern of Nobel Winners. The first set of slides show some of the patterns so far found, and will be augmented for the formal paper. The second set of slides shows some examples of the Nobel families. The authors a developing a systematic data base of Nobel Winners (mainly US), their careers and their family histories. This turned out to be much more challenging than expected, since many winners do not emphasize their family origins in their own biographies or autobiographies or other commentary. Dr. Caporale has reached out to some laureates or their families to elicit that information. We plan to systematically compare the laureates to the population in the US at large, including immigrants and non‐immigrants at various periods. Outline of Presentation • A preliminary examination of the 609 Nobel Prize Winners, 291 of whom were at an American Institution when they received the Nobel in physics, chemistry or physiology and medicine • Will look at patterns of
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Crystallography from the Perspective of Technology Developments
    Crystallography Reviews ISSN: 0889-311X (Print) 1476-3508 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gcry20 Protein crystallography from the perspective of technology developments Xiao-Dong Su, Heng Zhang, Thomas C. Terwilliger, Anders Liljas, Junyu Xiao & Yuhui Dong To cite this article: Xiao-Dong Su, Heng Zhang, Thomas C. Terwilliger, Anders Liljas, Junyu Xiao & Yuhui Dong (2015) Protein crystallography from the perspective of technology developments, Crystallography Reviews, 21:1-2, 122-153, DOI: 10.1080/0889311X.2014.973868 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0889311X.2014.973868 Published online: 13 Dec 2014. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 304 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=gcry20 Download by: [Peking University] Date: 18 November 2015, At: 02:19 Crystallography Reviews, 2015 Vol. 21, Nos. 1–2, 122–153, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0889311X.2014.973868 REVIEW ARTICLE Protein crystallography from the perspective of technology developments Xiao-Dong Sua∗, Heng Zhanga, Thomas C. Terwilligerb, Anders Liljasc, Junyu Xiaoa and Yuhui Dongd aState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, and Biodynamic Optical Imaging Center (BIOPIC), School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China; bBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mail Stop M888, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA; cDepartment of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; d Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China (Received 2 October 2014; accepted 3 October 2014) Early on, crystallography was a domain of mineralogy and mathematics and dealt mostly with symmetry properties and imaginary crystal lattices.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Biozoom
    NO. 2 2018 VOLUME 20 DANISH SOCIETY FOR BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY – WWW.BIOKEMI.ORG Din partner inden for salg, service og kalibrering af laboratorie- og pipetteringsudstyr Nyt automatiseringsinstrument fra Integra Viaflo Med Assist Plus bliver rutine pipetterings- opgaver lettere og ensartet • Features som: • Fyldning af plader • Fortyningsrækker • Plader fra 12 til 384 brønde • Automatisk spidspåsætning • Automatisk spidsafskydning • Racks til forskellige rør • Programmering via PC Assist Plus er tilgængelig på det danske marked fra november 2018. Ønsker du flere informationer eller bestille tid til en demo, så kontakt os allerede nu. Skriv til Kirsten Thuesen [email protected] Saml dine akkrediterede kalibreringer af vægte og pipetter hos os DANAK har godkendt Dandiag (Reg. nr. 490) til at udføre akkrediterede kalibreringer af laboratorie vægte fra 1 mg og optil 72 kg. Det betyder, at vi nu kan tilbyde dig, at stå for dine akkrediterede kalibreringer på dine vægte og pipetter. For dig betyder det, at du kun behøver at ringe ét sted, når du skal bruge hjælp til at få foretaget disse kalibreringer. Så ønsker du en høj præcision eller skal I auditeres, har du fordele ved at anvende os. Det er nu nemt, trygt og oplagt at samle dine bestillinger her, hvor du kender kvaliteten som Dandiag står for. Har du brug for at spare tid, så bestil dine vægte og pipetter med en akkrediteret kalibrering. Med et kalibreringscertifikat fra Dandiag får du en garanti for, at dit udstyr er kalibreret i henhold til ISO 8655 (pipetter) og ISO 17025, hvilket kan bruges i forhold til dine egne krav. Dandiag A/S Baldershøj 19 DK-2635 Ishøj Tlf.
    [Show full text]
  • ATP and Cellular Work | Principles of Biology from Nature Education
    contents Principles of Biology 23 ATP and Cellular Work ATP provides the energy that powers cells. Magnetic resonance images of three different areas in the rat brain show blood flow and the biochemical measurements of ATP, pH, and glucose, which are all measures of energy use and production in brain tissue. The image is color-coded to show spatial differences in the concentration of these energy-related variables in brain tissue. © 1997 Nature Publishing Group Hoehn-Berlage, M., et al. Inhibition of nonselective cation channels reduces focal ischemic injury of rat brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 17, 534–542 (1997) doi: 10.1097/00004647-199705000-00007. Used with permission. Topics Covered in this Module Using Energy Resources For Work ATP-Driven Work Major Objectives of this Module Describe the role of ATP in energy-coupling reactions. Explain how ATP hydrolysis performs cellular work. Recognize chemical reactions that require ATP hydrolysis. page 116 of 989 4 pages left in this module contents Principles of Biology 23 ATP and Cellular Work Energy is a fundamental necessity for all of life's processes. Without energy, flagella cannot move, DNA cannot be unwound or separated for replication or gene expression, cells cannot divide, plants cannot grow and animals cannot reproduce. Energy is vital, but where does it come from? Plants and photosynthetic microbes capture light energy and convert it into chemical energy for their own use. Organisms that cannot produce their own food, such as fungi and animals, feed upon this captured energy. However, the chemical energy produced by photosynthesizers needs to be converted into a usable form.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Mass Spectrometry in Biology and Physiology
    Application of Mass Spectrometry in Biology and Physiology A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) In the Department of Chemistry of McMicken College of Arts and Sciences by Jiawei Gong Bachelor of Science (B.S.), Chemistry Xiamen University, 2012 Dissertation Advisor: Joseph A. Caruso, Ph.D Abstract Mass spectrometry, as an analytical technique that sorts ions based on their mass to charge ratio, is playing significant roles in analysis not only in chemistry field, but also in other areas such as biology and physiology. In this dissertation, the application of mass spectrometry, including both atomic and molecular mass spectrometry, was investigated in those two areas mentioned above. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS), a typical atomic analysis technique, is a powerful tool for elemental detection and speciation. Instrumental advances, such as the dynamic reaction cell and triple quad alignment, gave rise to monitoring sulfur and phosphorus that suffered a lot from polyatomic interferences and ionization issue in previous study. Additionally, ICPMS is capable of element specific detection, where the intensity of each element is directly proportional to the element present in the samples, allowing for element quantification via peak area integration. All these capabilities mentioned above opened a new window for the detection and quantification of DNA protein crosslinks (DPCs) as there is always sulfur in proteins and phosphorous in DNA. In this dissertation, an approach for purification and quantitative analysis of DPCs was established by increasing the sensitivity of sulfur and phosphorus signal via ICPMS.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Premios Nobel De Química
    Los premios Nobel de Química MATERIAL RECOPILADO POR: DULCE MARÍA DE ANDRÉS CABRERIZO Los premios Nobel de Química El campo de la Química que más premios ha recibido es el de la Quí- mica Orgánica. Frederick Sanger es el único laurea- do que ganó el premio en dos oca- siones, en 1958 y 1980. Otros dos también ganaron premios Nobel en otros campos: Marie Curie (física en El Premio Nobel de Química es entregado anual- 1903, química en 1911) y Linus Carl mente por la Academia Sueca a científicos que so- bresalen por sus contribuciones en el campo de la Pauling (química en 1954, paz en Física. 1962). Seis mujeres han ganado el Es uno de los cinco premios Nobel establecidos en premio: Marie Curie, Irène Joliot- el testamento de Alfred Nobel, en 1895, y que son dados a todos aquellos individuos que realizan Curie (1935), Dorothy Crowfoot Ho- contribuciones notables en la Química, la Física, la dgkin (1964), Ada Yonath (2009) y Literatura, la Paz y la Fisiología o Medicina. Emmanuelle Charpentier y Jennifer Según el testamento de Nobel, este reconocimien- to es administrado directamente por la Fundación Doudna (2020) Nobel y concedido por un comité conformado por Ha habido ocho años en los que no cinco miembros que son elegidos por la Real Aca- demia Sueca de las Ciencias. se entregó el premio Nobel de Quí- El primer Premio Nobel de Química fue otorgado mica, en algunas ocasiones por de- en 1901 al holandés Jacobus Henricus van't Hoff. clararse desierto y en otras por la Cada destinatario recibe una medalla, un diploma y situación de guerra mundial y el exi- un premio económico que ha variado a lo largo de los años.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressemitteilung 6. Juli 2018 Nobelpreisträgertreffen in Lindau
    Pressemitteilung 6. Juli 2018 Nobelpreisträgertreffen in Lindau: Jenaer PostDoc mit dabei Die 68. Lindauer Nobelpreisträgertagung zum Schwerpunktthema Physiologie und Medizin fand vom 24. bis 29. Juni statt. 39 Nobelpreisträger trafen sich mit rund 600 hervorragenden Studierenden, Promovierenden und PostDocs aus 84 Nationen zum Austausch zwischen Wissenschaftlern unterschiedlicher Generationen, Kulturen und Disziplinen. Dr. Danny Schnerwitzki, PostDoc am Leibniz-Institut für Alternsforschung – Fritz-Lipmann-Institut (FLI) in Jena, war einer von 10 Teilnehmern der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, der für das Treffen ausgewählt wurde und teilnehmen durfte. Jena/Lindau. Jedes Jahr im Sommer kommen in Lindau am Bodensee Nobelpreisträger mit ausgezeichneten Nachwuchswissenschaftlern aus aller Welt zusammen, um den Austausch zwischen Wissenschaftlern unterschiedlicher Generationen, Kulturen und Disziplinen zu fördern. Die diesjährige 68. Lindauer Nobelpreisträgertagung zum Schwerpunktthema Physiologie und Medizin fand vergangene Woche vom 24. bis 29. Juni mit 39 Nobelpreisträgern und 600 hervorragenden Studierenden, Promovierenden und PostDocs unter 35 Jahren statt. Die Teilnehmer der Nobelpreisträgertagung wurden in einem mehrstufigen Bewerbungsverfahren ausgewählt und kamen dieses Jahr aus 84 Ländern. Einer von ihnen war Dr. Danny Schnerwitzki, PostDoc in der Forschungsgruppe Englert am Leibniz-Institut für Alternsforschung - Fritz-Lipmann- Institut in Jena. Er forscht an Entwicklungsgenen, die bei Regenerations- und Alternsprozessen beteiligt sind.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Government: a Nobel Profession
    The Federal Government: A Nobel Profession A Report on Pathbreaking Nobel Laureates in Government 1901 - 2002 INTRODUCTION The Nobel Prize is synonymous with greatness. A list of Nobel Prize winners offers a quick register of the world’s best and brightest, whose accomplishments in literature, economics, medicine, science and peace have enriched the lives of millions. Over the past century, 270 Americans have received the Nobel Prize for innovation and ingenuity. Approximately one-fourth of these distinguished individuals are, or were, federal employees. Their Nobel contributions have resulted in the eradication of polio, the mapping of the human genome, the harnessing of atomic energy, the achievement of peace between nations, and advances in medicine that not only prolong our lives, but “This report should serve improve their quality. as an inspiration and a During Public Employees Recognition Week (May 4-10, 2003), in an effort to recognize and honor the reminder to us all of the ideas and accomplishments of federal workers past and present, the Partnership for Public Service offers innovation and nobility of this report highlighting 50 American Nobel laureates the work civil servants do whose award-winning achievements occurred while they served in government or whose public service every day and its far- work had an impact on their career achievements. They were honored for their contributions in the fields reaching impact.” of Physiology or Medicine, Economic Sciences, and Physics and Chemistry. Also included are five Americans whose work merited the Peace Prize. Despite this legacy of accomplishment, too few Americans see the federal government as an incubator for innovation and discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Award Stirs up Debate on Nitric Oxide Breakthrough
    news Nobel award stirs up debate on nitric oxide breakthrough [LONDON] The Nobel committee has once again sparked controversy, particularly in Britain, with the award this week of the 1998 8 prize for physiology or medicine to pharma- cologists Robert Furchgott, of the State Uni- versity of New York, Louis Ignarro, of the University of California, Los Angeles, and Ferid Murad, of University of Texas Medical SULLIVAN NADEL/PAT AP/ADAM School in Houston. No-one is disputing that the pioneering work of the three US researchers on nitric oxide as a signalling molecule in the cardio- vascular system (see box) deserves the recog- nition of the committee. But many feel that a The winners: Robert Furchgott (left), Louis Ignarro and Ferid Murad. fourth name should also have been recog- nized — that of Salvador Moncada, currently pharmacology”. Moncada’s achievements edged. But he believes that the prize is thor- director of the Wolfson Institute for Biomed- were recognized when he was elected as a oughly deserved by Furchgott — without ical Research at University College London. foreign associate of the National Academy of whom “the field would not even exist” — The controversy originates in 1987, when Sciences in 1994. The citation says that he and says that he had nominated both Furch- a paper by Ignarro confirming the identity “discovered that mammalian vascular tis- gott and Ignarro for the prize. of endothelium-derived relaxing factor sues generate nitric oxide that is biosynthe- More outspoken support for Moncada (EDRF) and nitric oxide, as had been sized from L-arginine. He elucidated the rel- comes from Nobel laureate Cesar Milstein of hypothesized separately by him and Furch- evance of this pathway as a universal trans- the MRC Laborato- UCL gott, appeared in the Proceedings of the duction mechanism for the regulation of cell ry of Molecular National Academy of Sciences (84, function and communication”.
    [Show full text]
  • Jahrbuch 2018 Leopoldina-Jahrbuch 2018 Leopoldina-Jahrbuch
    Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Jahrbuch 2018 Leopoldina-Jahrbuch 2018 Leopoldina-Jahrbuch Herausgegeben von Jörg Hacker Präsident der Akademie Leopoldina Reihe 3, Jahrgang 64 (2018), Halle (Saale) 2019 Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft Stuttgart Leopoldina-Jahrbuch 2018 Jahrbuch 2018 Leopoldina Reihe 3, Jahrgang 64 Herausgegeben von Jörg Hacker Präsident der Akademie Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften, Halle (Saale) 2019 Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft Stuttgart Redaktion: Dr. Michael Kaasch und Dr. Joachim Kaasch Das Jahrbuch erscheint bei der Wissenschaftlichen Verlagsgesellschaft Stuttgart, Birkenwaldstraße 44, 70191 Stuttgart, Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Das Jahrbuch wird gefördert durch das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung sowie das Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Digitalisierung des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt. Bitte zu beachten: Die Leopoldina Reihe 3 bildet bibliographisch die Fortsetzung von: (R. 1) Leopoldina, Amtliches Organ … Heft 1– 58 (Jena etc. 1859 –1922/23) (R. 2) Leopoldina, Berichte … Band 1– 6 (Halle 1926 –1930) Zitiervorschlag: Jahrbuch 2018. Leopoldina (R. 3) 64 (2019) Die Abkürzung ML hinter dem Namen steht für Mitglied der Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften. Die im Jahrbuch angegebenen Internetadressen und Verlinkungen sind zum Zeitpunkt des Erscheinens der Publikation gültig. Spätere Veränderungen durch die Betreiber der Internetseiten
    [Show full text]
  • Close to the Edge: Co-Authorship Proximity of Nobel Laureates in Physiology Or Medicine, 1991 - 2010, to Cross-Disciplinary Brokers
    Close to the edge: Co-authorship proximity of Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine, 1991 - 2010, to cross-disciplinary brokers Chris Fields 528 Zinnia Court Sonoma, CA 95476 USA fi[email protected] January 2, 2015 Abstract Between 1991 and 2010, 45 scientists were honored with Nobel prizes in Physiology or Medicine. It is shown that these 45 Nobel laureates are separated, on average, by at most 2.8 co-authorship steps from at least one cross-disciplinary broker, defined as a researcher who has published co-authored papers both in some biomedical discipline and in some non-biomedical discipline. If Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine and their immediate collaborators can be regarded as forming the intuitive “center” of the biomedical sciences, then at least for this 20-year sample of Nobel laureates, the center of the biomedical sciences within the co-authorship graph of all of the sciences is closer to the edges of multiple non-biomedical disciplines than typical biomedical researchers are to each other. Keywords: Biomedicine; Co-authorship graphs; Cross-disciplinary brokerage; Graph cen- trality; Preferential attachment Running head: Proximity of Nobel laureates to cross-disciplinary brokers 1 1 Introduction It is intuitively tempting to visualize scientific disciplines as spheres, with highly produc- tive, well-funded intellectual and political leaders such as Nobel laureates occupying their centers and less productive, less well-funded researchers being increasingly peripheral. As preferential attachment mechanisms as well as the economics of employment tend to give the well-known and well-funded more collaborators than the less well-known and less well- funded (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Scientists of the American Physiological Society
    Women Scientists of the American Physiological Society The Women in Physiology Committee maintains a Society who have not received a questionnaire or who would database on women members of the Society that allows us to like to update a previously submitted questionnaire should track the professional characteristics of women physiologists. contact the APS office. The database is compiled through a questionnaire that is peri- Figure 1 shows the distribution of academic and other odically sent to all women members. In addition to providing positions held by the respondents. The “other” category in- information for our members on the status of women in phys- cludes positions or ranks that did not fit in any of the cate- iology, the trends and statistics produced by the database is gories listed, including “research physiologist,” “clinical as- made available to other organizations that are interested in sistant professor,” etc. the status of women scientists. Women who complete the Four hundred fifty-eight women in the database hold questionnaire can indicate whether they would like to have PhD degrees. MD degrees are held by 78; 58 women have their names made available to prospective employers. master’s degrees, and 42 checked “other.” The years of re- Departmental chairs, search committees, and other employers ceipt of these degrees are indicated in Table 1. In terms of are encouraged to contact the APS office to obtain a list of postgraduate training, 54 of the respondents stated they had women physiologists who are interested in academic, indus- received 1 year of postdoctoral training; 119 indicated 2 trial, or administrative positions.
    [Show full text]