Tottel's Miscellany and the English Renaissance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tottel's Miscellany and the English Renaissance Copyright by Carol Dawn Blosser 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Carol Dawn Blosser certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Making “English Eloquence:” Tottel’s Miscellany and the English Renaissance Committee: _________________________ Frank Whigham, Supervisor _________________________ Wayne Rebhorn _________________________ Michael Winship __________________________ Dolora Wojciehowski __________________________ Brian Levack Making “English Eloquence:” Tottel’s Miscellany and the English Renaissance by Carol Dawn Blosser, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2005 Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been possible without the help of many wonderful colleagues, family, and friends. To begin with, I owe a debt of gratitude to my dissertation committee: my director, Frank Whigham, and my committee members, Wayne Rebhorn, Michael Winship, Dolora Wojciehowski, and Brian Levack. They are inspiring scholars and teachers, and I can only hope that my work reflects the standards of intellectual curiosity and rigor they imparted to me. Secondly, my dissertation reading group –– Vimala Pasupathi, Paul Sullivan, Suzanne Penuel, Doug Eskew, and Lois Kim –– read draft after draft of this project from its very beginning and tirelessly offered support, feedback, and camaraderie. Vim, Paul, and Suzanne also offered the support of friendship through the roughest times of this process. Without their strength, kindness, integrity, and intellectual understanding, I would not have been able to complete this dissertation, nor would I have known what it is to have a scholarly community: et in Arcadia ego. Thank you. My friends and family also have been there all along, cheering me on and providing their own forms of support, moral and otherwise. My parents Fred and Donna, my sister Susan, my grandmother Mozelle, and my aunts, uncles, and cousins never once doubted that I could do this. I believe they are as proud of me as I am of them. My fellow graduate students at the University of Texas at Austin, my colleagues at the Undergraduate Writing Center (especially Scott Blackwood, Vince Lozano, and Michele Solberg), and my “real world” friends have made the last seven years joyful, wonderful iv ones, both the good times and the bad. Finally, I must thank Doug for putting up with the poets and my obsession with them for the last two years and for making the rest of my life so rich. In the words of Lady Mary Wroth, “His sight giues life vnto my loue-rould [eyes], / My loue content, because in his loue lies.” v Making “English Eloquence:” Tottel’s Miscellany and the English Renaissance Publication No.____________ Carol Dawn Blosser, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2005 Supervisor: Frank Whigham The 1557 edition of Tottel’s Miscellany is commonly known as the publication event that began the Renaissance in England. This project regards the 1557 publication of this early and influential poetry anthology as a watershed moment in the formation of the English literary canon. It revises received accounts of Renaissance literary history by revealing the social and political processes behind the dissemination of courtly lyric poetry, as well as by interrogating the book’s canonization of courtly authors, such as Sir Thomas Wyatt and the Earl of Surrey, and of elite poetic forms, such as the sonnet. I argue that in the unstable political context of the 1550s, the Miscellany’s poems became desirable tools with which non-courtly readers could negotiate their own changing social and religious identities using poetic language and forms endowed with the authority of the court. After the iconoclasm of the Henrician Reformation and during the violence of the Marian Counter-Reformation, the Miscellany offered English readers new icons of cultural coherence – the courtier poets – and a new cultural identity, as members of a learned community dedicated to cultivating “English eloquence.” Nevertheless, I suggest, the book’s print features reveal how carefully it constructed literary values that favored the vi elite forms and authors, and its multiple voices and perspectives challenge the division between elite and popular culture it helped to construct. By understanding the relationship between this landmark book’s textual composition and its cultural context, we can appreciate more fully how the critical judgments of Tottel and his readers still actively shape the modern academic canon. vii Table of Contents Introduction….. 1 Chapter One…..32 Chapter Two…..87 Chapter Three…..144 Chapter Four…..246 Conclusion…..329 Appendix A: Chapter Three Poems…..352 Appendix B: Chapter Four Poems…..364 Works Cited…..376 Vita…..394 viii Introduction The Beginning of Modern English Verse? Tottel’s Miscellany and the English Renaissance Works are produced within a specific order that has its own rules, conventions, and hierarchies, but they escape all these and take on a certain density in their peregrinations –– which can be a very long time span –– about the social world. Roger Chartier, The Order of Books (x) “It is my belief that culture is more important to people than political institutions.” Norman Davies, “The Breakup of the United Kingdom” On June 5, 1557, a law printer named Richard Tottel published the first edition of Songs and Sonnets, written by the right honorable Lord Henry Howard late Earl of Surrey, and others, a poetic anthology that included poems by Surrey, Sir Thomas Wyatt, Nicholas Grimald, and a host of anonymous poets. The book went through at least eight more editions until 1587, and all but the last two were produced by the original publisher (Rollins 2.6). By the nineteenth century the book was known more commonly as Tottel’s Miscellany, after its printer, and since that time it has been widely regarded as the book that heralded the beginning of the English Renaissance. In his 1929 edition of the Miscellany, still the standard critical edition (rev. 1965), Hyder Rollins calls the book 1 “epoch-making” (3) and “one of the most important single volumes in the history of English literature,” a judgment supported by numerous critics (4). Even earlier than Rollins, John Berdan identified the Miscellany as “the gateway through which the courtly poetry of Henry VIII passed on to the Elizabethans” (343). More recently Roland Greene has referred to the book as a “canon-making anthology of mid-century English verse” (250); Wendy Wall agrees “it certainly was the handbook for Elizabethan poets” (24). Regardless of how they regard its contents, these critics all acknowledge the impact that the book had on its culture. Alongside this picture of the book as an epochal text, however, runs the commonplace that the publication of the Miscellany was little more than an act of poaching, the theft of poems that rightfully belonged to the aristocracy and were released to a gossip-hungry and status-worshiping readership of social upstarts. One of the seminal works to take this position, J.W. Saunders’s classic essay “The Stigma of Print: a Note on the Social Bases of Tudor Poetry,” claims that the aversion gentlemen had to printing their literary works created a culture in which “the printer was able to take unscrupulous advantage of a Court poet by piracies which could not with dignity be prevented” (140). According to Saunders, an example of this kind of situation is the publication of Tottel’s Miscellany, through which the “unimportance of the printed-book audience is proved conclusively by the time-lag between the composition of most Tudor 2 poetry and its appearance in print” (139). Saunders notes that “Wyatt died in 1542, but... the bulk of his work remained in manuscript until the publication of Tottel’s Miscellany in 1557” (139). For Saunders, the fact that some of the poets in this monumental book were dead before they were published, while others were satisfactorily anonymous, supports his hypothesis that all Tudor poets scorned print and his implication that the Miscellany itself was an act of misappropriation and deception. To be sure, Tottel’s act of publishing poems that aristocrats may have felt belonged to them carried certain risks. We do not know for certain how Tottel acquired the poems he printed in the Miscellany; no surviving source manuscript conveniently groups the poems of Surrey and Wyatt with those of Nicholas Grimald and anonymous courtly poets. The probability remains that Tottel acquired the poems from a variety of sources, either by purchasing them or through outright theft, and invented the arrangement and framing material. Understanding how even Tottel’s purchase of the poems may have been perceived by those in the court as an act of theft, however, requires us to look more carefully at the concepts of privacy, purchase, and piracy that circulated in sixteenth century manuscript and print culture, as I do in the first chapter of this study. The risks that Tottel ran in printing poems that were, at least according to some, “pirated” were substantial. In the sixteenth century and particularly during the religious violence of the 1550s, books were regularly recalled and suppressed; as the printer 3 assumed the bulk of the responsibility for publishing controversial material, a lack of circumspection could be serious. Although not a printer, the stationer James Bainham was burned at the stake in Smithfield in 1532 for espousing William Tyndale’s radical Protestant ideas (Blayney 32). Perhaps it was for this reason that it was not until the late 1530s and 1540s, when the climate was safer, that English printers began to produce Protestant works in London (Hellinga and Trapp, “Introduction” 26-27). In 1553, however, Tottel’s father-in-law, the Protestant printer Richard Grafton, was deprived of his office as royal printer for printing a proclamation under the name of Queen Jane Grey (Neville-Sington, “Press, Politics, and Religion” 602).
Recommended publications
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv2w736 Author Harkins, Robert Lee Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Miscellany
    Literary Miscellany Including Recent Acquisitions, Manuscripts & Letters, Presentation & Association Copies, Art & Illustrated Works, Film-Related Material, Etcetera. Catalogue 349 WILLIAM REESE COMPANY 409 TEMPLE STREET NEW HAVEN, CT. 06511 USA 203.789.8081 FAX: 203.865.7653 [email protected] www.williamreesecompany.com TERMS Material herein is offered subject to prior sale. All items are as described, but are consid- ered to be sent subject to approval unless otherwise noted. Notice of return must be given within ten days unless specific arrangements are made prior to shipment. All returns must be made conscientiously and expediently. Connecticut residents must be billed state sales tax. Postage and insurance are billed to all non-prepaid domestic orders. Orders shipped outside of the United States are sent by air or courier, unless otherwise requested, with full charges billed at our discretion. The usual courtesy discount is extended only to recognized booksellers who offer reciprocal opportunities from their catalogues or stock. We have 24 hour telephone answering and a Fax machine for receipt of orders or messages. Catalogue orders should be e-mailed to: [email protected] We do not maintain an open bookshop, and a considerable portion of our literature inven- tory is situated in our adjunct office and warehouse in Hamden, CT. Hence, a minimum of 24 hours notice is necessary prior to some items in this catalogue being made available for shipping or inspection (by appointment) in our main offices on Temple Street. We accept payment via Mastercard or Visa, and require the account number, expiration date, CVC code, full billing name, address and telephone number in order to process payment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Seven Deadly Sins</Em>
    Early Theatre 10.1 (2007) ROBERT HORNBACK The Reasons of Misrule Revisited: Evangelical Appropriations of Carnival in Tudor Revels Undoubtedly the most arresting Tudor likeness in the National Portrait Gallery, London, is William Scrots’s anamorphosis (NPG1299). As if mod- eled after a funhouse mirror reflection, this colorful oil on panel painting depicts within a stretched oblong, framed within a thin horizontal rectangle, the profile of a child with red hair and a head far wider than it is tall; measur- ing 63 inches x 16 ¾ inches, the portrait itself is, the Gallery website reports, its ‘squattest’ (‘nearly 4 times wider than it is high’). Its short-lived sitter’s nose juts out, Pinocchio-like, under a low bump of overhanging brow, as the chin recedes cartoonishly under a marked overbite. The subject thus seems to prefigure the whimsical grotesques of Inigo Jones’s antimasques decades later rather than to depict, as it does, the heir apparent of Henry VIII. Such is underrated Flemish master Scrots’s tour de force portrait of a nine-year-old Prince Edward in 1546, a year before his accession. As the NPG website ex- plains, ‘[Edward] is shown in distorted perspective (anamorphosis) …. When viewed from the right,’ however, ie, from a small cut-out in that side of the frame, he can be ‘seen in correct perspective’.1 I want to suggest that this de- lightful anamorphic image, coupled with the Gallery’s dry commentary, pro- vides an ironic but apt metaphor for the critical tradition addressing Edward’s reign and its theatrical spectacle: only when viewed from a one-sided point of view – in hindsight, from the anachronistic vantage point of an Anglo-Amer- ican tradition inflected by subsequent protestantism – can the boy king, his often riotous court spectacle, and mid-Tudor evangelicals in general be made to resemble a ‘correct’ portrait of the protestant sobriety, indeed the dour puritanism, of later generations.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Compiled and Edited the Mashhad Miscellany?
    ­­Who Compiled and Edited the Mashhad Miscellany? LUKE TREADWELL University of Oxford ([email protected]) Abstract The identity of the editors of the Mashhad miscellany generated considerable scholarly debate for a couple of decades after Togan’s discovery of the Mashhad manuscript in 1923, but interest in the topic declined after the middle of the century. In the last seventy years, it is the miscellany’s four texts, in particular the Kitāb of Ibn Faḍlān, that have monopolized scholarly attention. This paper reopens the file on the mysterious editors in the belief that their role remains the key to understanding the majmūʿa as well as its component texts. It reexamines the paratextual apparatus with which the editors framed the miscellany and concludes that the editors did not belong to the Mashriqī literary elite as earlier scholars maintained. The “editors” were in all probability not men of flesh and blood, but the fictional creations of the traveler, poet, and nadīm Abū Dulaf al-Khazrajī, author of the miscellany’s two Risālas. His role as the mastermind of the Mashhad miscellany compels us to reevaluate the miscellany’s literary context and to think again about the provenance, structure, and contents of its four texts. 1. Introduction Who compiled and edited the Mashhad miscellany? This question generated much scholarly interest for a couple of decades after Togan’s discovery of the Mashhad manuscript in 1923.1 Two Russian historians, Krachkovskiǐ and Kovalevskiǐ, were particularly attentive to the issue in the first half of the twentieth century, but thereafter interest in the topic declined.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Humanism Poetry Prose
    RENAISSANCE HUMANISM The society. Medieval society was organized in a strict hierarchical order: the Pope and the Emperor were the greatest authorities, and every man had a definite place in it. Religion had a prominent role: medieval knowledge was contained in the «Holy Scriptures» and in the «Scholastic philosophy», and the most authoritative guide to Christians were the Gospel and the Bible. In that kind of society, thought and free activity were checked and confined to the boundaries of dogma and institutions. This inevitably caused interior conflicts and contrasts which became more evident in the last stage of the Middle Ages, when a series of forces and factors contributed to alter the old balance. The expansion of trade and the growth of the towns destroyed the feudal economy and deeply affected the social and political institutions. Other relevant factors were scientific progress and geographical discoveries, such as the voyage of Christopher Columbus to America in 1492. These events changed the ways of life and altered the view of the universe as well as man’s position in it. The language. 16th century English was much more modern than Medieval English, though its grammar and vocabulary still retained archaisms. The great development of prose, above all the translation of the Bible into English in a simple and popular language, avoiding both Latin and French words, greatly contributed in giving a modern form to English and spreading it among the people. POETRY The revival of poetry was largely influenced by Humanism, especially by the Italian Renaissance. Two courtier poets, Wyatt (15031542) and Surrey (1517-1547), during the reign of Henry VIII undertook the task of adapting Italian models to English poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The early career op Christopher Goodman and his place in the development of English protestant thought Dawson, Jane E. A. How to cite: Dawson, Jane E. A. (1978) The early career op Christopher Goodman and his place in the development of English protestant thought, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8005/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE EAPiY CAREER OP CHRISTOPHER GOODMAN AND HIS PLACE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH PROTESTANT THOUGHT JANE E. A. DAWSON Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Durham 1978 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. JANE E.A.
    [Show full text]
  • View of the Great
    This dissertation has been 62—769 microfilmed exactly as received GABEL, John Butler, 1931- THE TUDOR TRANSLATIONS OF CICERO'S DE OFFICIIS. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1961 Language and Literature, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE TUDOR TRANSLATIONS OP CICERO'S DE OFFICIIS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By John Butler Gabel, B. A., M. A., A. M. ****** The Ohio State University 1961 Approved by Adviser Department of Ehglis7 PREFACE The purpose of this dissertation is to throw light on the sixteenth-century English translations of De Offioiis, one of Cicero’s most popular and most influential works. The dissertation first surveys the history and reputation of the Latin treatise to I600 and sketchs the lives of the English translators. It then establishes the facts of publication of the translations and identifies the Latin texts used in them. Finally it analyzes the translations themselves— their syntax, diction, and English prose style in general— against the background of the theory and prac­ tice of translation in their respective periods. I have examined copies of the numerous editions of the translations in the Folger Shakespeare Library, the Library of Congress, and the libraries of the Ohio State University and the University of Illinois. I have also made use of films of copies in the British Museum and the Huntington Library. I have indicated the location of the particular copies upon which the bibliographical descrip­ tions in Chapter 3 are based.
    [Show full text]
  • Fictions of Collaboration : Authors and Editors in the Sixteenth Century
    Fictions of collaboration : authors and editors in the sixteenth century Autor(en): Burrow, Colin Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: SPELL : Swiss papers in English language and literature Band (Jahr): 25 (2011) PDF erstellt am: 10.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-389636 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Fictions of Collaboration: Authors and Editors in the Sixteenth Century CoUn Burrow This essay tracks the changing relationship between authors and editors (or print-shop "overseers" of kterary texts), in the second half of the sixteenth century. Beginning with the pubücation of works by Thomas More, Thomas Wyatt, and Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, it shows how editorial activity helped to fashion the ways in which authors were represented.
    [Show full text]
  • “Pictures…Of a Good Subject”: Friendship, the Commonwealth, and the Care of the Self in Early Modern Literature and Culture
    “PICTURES…OF A GOOD SUBJECT”: FRIENDSHIP, THE COMMONWEALTH, AND THE CARE OF THE SELF IN EARLY MODERN LITERATURE AND CULTURE By Andrew Scott Kranzman A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of English – Doctor of Philosophy 2015 ABSTRACT “PICTURES…OF A GOOD SUBJECT”: FRIENDSHIP, THE COMMONWEALTH, AND THE CARE OF THE SELF IN EARLY MODERN LITERATURE AND CULTURE By Andrew Scott Kranzman This dissertation argues that emphases on self-knowledge and duty within friendship discourse of the early modern period repudiates a common assumption that friendship is primarily a private, selfless, apolitical affair separate from public life. This discourse largely highlights fashioning the self as an ethical and political subject while the friend per se remains of secondary concern. As the Early Modern Research Group observes, “the commonwealth…act[s] as a language to articulate personal and public vices and virtues” (Early Modern Research Group 670). An emphasis on obligation and reciprocity for the common good or bonum commune, the importance of social hierarchy, obedience, and subordination, as well as a belief in moral discipline as the anodyne to social ills prove to be recurring components of this “language.” Some major concerns within friendship discourse and practice include: the realization of membership in a larger community; the importance of measure and mean to both individual and community well-being; the obligation to admonish community members who fail to uphold duties and shared moral standards; and the necessity of social concord across various classes. Moreover, period conceptions of friendship demonstrate that the formation of “good” and “dutiful” does not proceed without cognitive, moral, and emotional struggles, particularly, as regards indifference, selfishness, flattery, and resentment.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of English Literature MICHAEL ALEXANDER
    A History of English Literature MICHAEL ALEXANDER [p. iv] © Michael Alexander 2000 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W 1 P 0LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2000 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world ISBN 0-333-91397-3 hardcover ISBN 0-333-67226-7 paperback A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 O1 00 Typeset by Footnote Graphics, Warminster, Wilts Printed in Great Britain by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham, Wilts [p. v] Contents Acknowledgements The harvest of literacy Preface Further reading Abbreviations 2 Middle English Literature: 1066-1500 Introduction The new writing Literary history Handwriting
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Texts, Medieval Subjectivities: Vernacular Genealogies of English Petrarchism from Wyatt to Wroth
    Renaissance Texts, Medieval Subjectivities: Vernacular Genealogies of English Petrarchism from Wyatt to Wroth by Danila A. Sokolov A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 2012 © Danila A. Sokolov 2012 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This dissertation investigates the symbolic presence of medieval forms of textual selfhood in early modern English Petrarchan poetry. Seeking to problematize the notion of Petrarchism as a Ren- aissance discourse par excellence, as a radical departure from the medieval past marking the birth of the modern poetic voice, the thesis undertakes a systematic re-reading of a significant body of early modern English Petrarchan texts through the prism of late medieval English poetry. I argue that me- dieval poetic texts inscribe in the vernacular literary imaginary (i.e. a repository of discursive forms and identities available to early modern writers through antecedent and contemporaneous literary ut- terances) a network of recognizable and iterable discursive structures and associated subject posi- tions; and that various linguistic and ideological traces of these medieval discourses and selves can be discovered in early modern English Petrarchism. Methodologically, the dissertation’s engagement with poetic texts across the lines of periodization is at once genealogical and hermeneutic. The prin- cipal objective of the dissertation is to uncover a vernacular history behind the subjects of early mod- ern English Petrarchan poems and sonnet sequences.
    [Show full text]