DOCSLIB.ORG

Advisory Circular

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advisory Circular Advisory U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Circular Administration Subject: EXPORT AIRWORTHINESS Date: AC No. 21-2H APPROVAL PROCEDURES Initiated by: AIR-200 Change ________________________________ ______________ 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) contains guidance and information on procedures for exporting aeronautical products and related special requirements submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) by other governments. 2. CANCELLATION. AC 21-2G, Export Airworthiness Approval Procedures, dated July 9, 1992, is hereby canceled. 3. PRINCIPAL CHANGES. a. A significant portion of the text of this AC has been revised to include current guidance. b. Appendix 1, Figure 4. Completed FAA Form 8130-3 is deleted. c. Appendix 2, Special Requirements of Importing Countries, has been updated as follows: (1) Special requirements have been added for The Bahamas, Barbados, China, Malawi, and Russian Federation (formerly Soviet Union). (2) Special requirements have been revised for Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Germany, Ireland, Malaysia, Norway, Pakistan, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, and Taiwan. d. Appendix 3, FAA Aircraft Certification Offices responsible for civil aviation matters in other countries, has been revised to reflect updated addresses. Addresses for International Flight Standards Field Offices have been added. e. Appendix 4, International Civil Aviation Office (ICAO) Member States, has been revised to reflect updated listings. 4. FORMAT. The special requirements contained in appendix 2 are provided in their original format as submitted by each country. Therefore, incorrect format and nonconformance with the FAA FORM 1320-15 (4-82) Supersedes WA Form 1320-2 AC 21-2H 05/20/96 United States (U.S.) Government Printing Office Style Manual and FAA Directives may be noticed. For any assistance with interpretations, contact: FAA, Production and Airworthiness Certification Division (AIR-200), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 20591. 5. GENERAL. a. This AC provides general information and guidance concerning issuance of export airworthiness approvals primarily for Class I products. Additionally, this AC provides guidance for completion of applications for export airworthiness certification for Class II and Class III products. This AC sets forth an acceptable means, but not the sole means, for compliance with applicable Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR). FAA Order 8130.2, Airworthiness Certification of Aircraft and Related Products, and 14 CFR part 21 (part 21), Subpart L, of the FAR provide additional explanation and guidance. FAA Order 8130.21, Procedures For Completion and Use of FAA Form 8130-3, Airworthiness Approval Tag, provides specific guidance for exportation of Class II and Class III products. Paragraphs 6 through 12 of this AC correspond with the FAR section under discussion. b. Persons desiring additional information or advice on obtaining an export airworthiness approval may contact the nearest FAA Flight Standards District Office, International Flight Standards Field Office, Aircraft Certification Office, or Manufacturing Inspection District/Satellite Office. Persons in other countries who wish to import aeronautical products from the U.S. or U.S. citizens located in other countries may contact the appropriate FAA Aircraft Certification Office or FAA International Flight Standards Field Office listed in appendix 3. c. The special requirements of the importing country referred to in FAR part 21, Subpart L, include special conditions and/or additional requirements specified by the Civil Aviation Authorities (CAA) of the importing country. When conditions or additional requirements are imposed by importing countries, the FAA must certify the exporter's compliance except as noted below: (1) Special requirements are administrative requirements which must be satisfied as a condition of shipment at the time of export. For example, they may involve the requirement for a U.S. Export Certificate of Airworthiness, copies of logbooks, flight manuals, etc. When a product does not meet the special requirements of an importing country, a written statement must be obtained by the exporter from the CAA of the importing country, indicating the CAA will accept the deviation. This statement must accompany FAA form 8130-1, Application for U.S. Export Certificate of Airworthiness. (2) Additional requirements are those found necessary by the importing country, in addition to the exporting country's certification or approval basis, to provide a level of safety and environmental quality equivalent to the importing country's certification basis. When these requirements cannot or will not be satisfied, the exporter must obtain a written statement from the CAA of the importing country indicating acceptance of the deviation. This statement must accompy the FAA Form 8130-1. Exporters are encouraged to obtain information on additional requirements from the importing country's CAA. Additional requirements by the importing country Page 2 Par 13 05/20/96 AC 21-2H should be documented on FAA Form 8130-1, block 10 when the consitute a difference to the type design. (3) Special conditions are airworthiness standards issued to cover novel and unusual design features that are not adequately covered by a country's applicable laws, regulations, or requirements. These special conditions should be included in the Type Certificate Data Sheets (TCDS) or Supplemental Type Certificates (STC) as applicable. Special conditions for U.S. type certifications are issued in accordance with FAR § 21.16. Exporters are encourage to obtain information on special conditions from the importing country's CAA. NOTE: Appendix 2 refers to various importing country's internal technical documents. These documents are not normally available in FAA offices. In such cases, it will be necessary for interested parties to obtain those documents directly from the importing country's embassy. d. FAA Form 8130-4, Export Certificate of Airworthiness, certifies compliance with applicable airworthiness requirements but DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AUTHORITY TO OPERATE AN AIRCRAFT. Information and guidance concerning appropriate airworthiness certificates, flight permits, and special flight authorizations are contained in AC 20-65, U.S. Airworthiness Certificates and Authorizations for Operation of Domestic and Foreign Aircraft. 6. FAR § 21.323, ELIGIBILITY. Individuals engaged in exporting civil aircraft and related products, including individual aircraft owners and their representatives, are eligible for an export airworthiness approval for a Class I or Class II product provided all pertinent requirements are met. A Class III product export airworthiness approval may only be issued by manufacturers (or their authorized suppliers) who have in their employ a designated representative of the Administrator authorized to issue that specific approval. The manufacturer must be a production approval holder (PAH) for that Class III product, that is, hold a Production Certificate (PC), an Approved Production Inspection System (APIS), Parts Manufacture Approval (PMA), or Technical Standard Order Authorization (TSOA). Class III products, including standard parts designated as AN, NAS, SAE, etc., not produced under an FAA production approval are therefore not eligible for an export airworthiness approval. NOTE: Export airworthiness approval for Class II or Class III products is issued in the form of Airworthiness Approval Tags, FAA Form 8130-3. Procedures for completion and use of FAA Form 8130-3 may be found in FAA Order 8130.21. 7. FAR § 21.325, EXPORT AIRWORTHINESS APPROVALS. a. This section covers products which may be approved for export and are defined in FAR § 21.325(b). A sample export airworthiness approval form, FAA Form 8130-4, is shown in appendix 1. b. The date of issuance for an export airworthiness approval is the date the product was inspected by the FAA or authorized designee and found to comply with the pertinent requirements. An export airworthiness approval means that AS OF THE DATE OF ISSUANCE the product covered was found airworthy by the FAA and in compliance with the applicable requirements. In Par 13 Page 3 AC 21-2H 05/20/96 order to preclude complaints from other countries and subsequent investigations by the FAA, it is recommended the exporter ensure the product meets its type design, is in a condition for safe operation, and meets the importing country's CAA requirements when delivered to the importer. 8. FAR § 21.327, APPLICATION. A separate application must be made for each aircraft, aircraft engine, and propeller; except that one application may be made for more than one engine or propeller, if all are of the same type and model and are exported to the same purchaser and country. One application may be submitted for more than one Class II product when the products are separated and identified as to the type and model of the related Class I product and are exported to the same purchaser and country. Class II products manufactured by a PC holder and Class III products produced by any PAH do not require a written application. In these cases, an oral application or request should be made to the FAA as specified in FAR § 21.327. A sample of FAA Form 8130-1, Application for Export Certificate of Airworthiness, is shown in appendix 1. Part I of the application should be completed for Class I products and Part II for Class II products. NOTE: A Class I product is defined as a complete aircraft, aircraft engine, or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Groningen Technology Operations and Management Master's Thesis Aviation in a Pandemic: the Profitability Approac
    Aviation in a Pandemic: The profitability approach for an airline's operation in a pandemic context - University of Groningen Technology Operations and Management Master’s Thesis Written by: Barran Haunan Supervisor: dr. N.B. Szirbik Co-assesor: dr. ir. D.J. van der Zee March 2, 2021 Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Theoretical background ............................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Revenue Framework ............................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Cost Framework .................................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Revenue and Cost Conditions during the Pandemic ....................................................... 11 3. Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Selecting case study as the main research design ................................................................... 14 3.2 Design Science Research ........................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Subject Selection:
    [Show full text]
  • Post COVID-19 Recovery Models and Strategies for Aviation in Indonesia
    International Journal of Technology 11(6) 1265-1274 (2020) Received August 2020 / Revised November 2020 / Accepted November 2020 International Journal of Technology http://ijtech.eng.ui.ac.id Post COVID-19 Recovery Models and Strategies for Aviation in Indonesia Heri Fathurahman1*, Muhammed Ali Berawi2, Imbuh Sulistyarini3, Andyka Kusuma2, Yasmine Nasution3, Komarudin4 1Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia 2Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia 3Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business,, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia 4Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia Abstract. Global aviation has experienced many crises in the past, each of which has had a significant impact on air traffic. After each fall, the industry recovers and returns stronger, exceeding the previous volume of traffic; however, the COVID-19 pandemic presents a new level of concern, with unknown detrimental effects. The airlines, airports and all other partners involved have greatly suffered. The airport system has been hit by flight closures in many markets, including Indonesia. Airport management and operating companies, concessionaires, terminal tenants, ground handling and catering companies, and the various partners involved are under stress and financial constraints due to the pandemic. In response to this, the flight plan for the “new normal” takes into account the new flight demand and airline market structure scenarios. By using the qualitative approach, this research tries to construct recovery models and strategies for the Indonesian aviation industry post-pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • E. Runway Length Analysis
    JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012 E. Runway Length Analysis This appendix describes the runway length analysis conducted for the Airport. Runway 7-25, the Airport’s primary runway, has a length of 8,700 feet and the existing crosswind runway (Runway 12-30) has a length of 3,207 feet. A runway length analysis was conducted to determine if additional runway length is required to meet the needs of aircraft forecasted to operate at the Airport through the planning period. The analysis was conducted according to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidance contained in Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5325-4B, Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design. The runway length analysis set forth in AC 150/5325-4B relates to both arrivals and departures, although departures typically require more runway length. Runway length requirements were determined separately for Runway 7-25 and Runway 12-30. E.1 Primary Runway Length Requirements According to AC 150/5325-4B, the design objective for the primary runway is to provide a runway length for all aircraft without causing operational weight restrictions. The methodology used to determine required runway lengths is based on the MTOW of the aircraft types to be evaluated, which are grouped into the following categories: Small aircraft (MTOW of 12,500 pounds or less) – Aircraft in this category range in size from ultralight aircraft to small turboprop aircraft. Within this category, aircraft are broken out by approach speeds (less than 30 knots, at least 30 knots but less than 50 knots, and more than 50 knots). Aircraft with approach speeds of more than 50 knots are further broken out by passenger seat capacity (less than 10 passenger seats and 10 or more passenger seats).
    [Show full text]
  • IAOPA Enews – January 2017 IAOPA Elects New Officers Results of the IAOPA Officer Election Have Been Finalized, and the Follow
    IAOPA eNews – January 2017 Editor’s note: Effective January 2017, IAOPA eNews will be distributed on the last day of the month, versus the first day as has been done in the past. This will allow for the capture of news in the month that it occurs and should facilitate an orderly story archiving and retrieval process. I hope that this change has not caused you any inconvenience and that you will find that this format works better for you and your members. IAOPA Elects New Officers Results of the IAOPA Officer election have been finalized, and the following are elected to serve as Officers of the Association for an effective term of 1 January, 2017 through December 31, 2019. Senior Vice President: Dr. Michael Erb, (Germany), European Region Vice President: Bernard Gervais, (COPA), North American Region Vice President: Hao Jianhua, (China), Asian Region Vice President: Chris Martinus, (South Africa), Africa/Middle East Region Vice President: Jaime Fabrega, (Panama), South American Region Vice President: Phillip Reiss, (Australia), Pacific Region Ken Mead has been reappointed to IAOPA Chief Counsel, Erica Saccoia has been reappointed as Treasurer, and Craig Spence has been reappointed as Secretary General of IAOPA. As IAOPA looks to the future and explores ways to engage ICAO at the regional level, the importance of the regional VP program will increase. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact IAOPA Headquarters for more details. IAOPA Welcomes 2 new affiliates The President of IAOPA has granted provisional membership to two new affiliates; AOPA Indonesia and AOPA Costa Rica. If approved by the IAOPA Board, they will become the 77th and 78th IAOPA Affiliates.
    [Show full text]
  • Inaca White Paper
    Universitas Padjadjaran INACA WHITE PAPER PROJECTED RECOVERY OF THE AVIATION INDUSTRY TOWARDS THE NEW NORMAL COOPERATION OF UNIVERSITAS PADJADJARAN (UNPAD) INACA Members INACA White Paper 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF PICTURES .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 6 I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 II. HEALTH ASPECT ............................................................................................................................. .............................. 16 NATIONAL VACCINATION PROGRAM STRATEGY AND POLICY .......................................................... 16 Planning of COVID-19 Vaccination Needs ................................................................................................... 18 Target of the Implementation of the COVID-19 Vaccination .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scheduled Civil Aircraft Emission Inventories for 1992: Database Development and Analysis
    NASA Contractor Report 4700 Scheduled Civil Aircraft Emission Inventories for 1992: Database Development and Analysis Steven L. Baughcum, Terrance G. Tritz, Stephen C. Henderson, and David C. Pickett Contract NAS1-19360 Prepared for Langley Research Center April 1996 NASA Contractor Report 4700 Scheduled Civil Aircraft Emission Inventories for 1992: Database Development and Analysis Steven L. Baughcum, Terrance G. Tritz, Stephen C. Henderson, and David C. Pickett Boeing Commercial Airplane Group • Seattle Washington National Aeronautics and Space Administration Prepared for Langley Research Center Langley Research Center • Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 under Contract NAS1-19360 April 1996 Printed copies available from the following: NASA Center for AeroSpace Information National Technical Information Service (NTIS) 800 Elkridge Landing Road 5285 Port Royal Road Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934 Springfield, VA 22161-2171 (301) 621-0390 (703) 487-4650 Executive Summary This report describes the development of a database of aircraft fuel burned and emissions from scheduled air traffic for each month of 1992. In addition, the earlier results (NASA CR-4592) for May 1990 scheduled air traffic have been updated using improved algorithms. These emissions inventories were developed under the NASA High Speed Research Systems Studies (HSRSS) contract NAS1-19360, Task Assignment 53. They will be available for use by atmospheric scientists conducting the Atmospheric Effects of Aviation Project (AEAP) modeling studies. A detailed database of fuel burned and emissions [NOx, carbon monoxide(CO), and hydrocarbons (HC)] for scheduled air traffic has been calculated for each month of 1992. In addition, the emissions for May 1990 have been recalculated using the same methodology. The data are on a 1° latitude x 1° longitude x 1 km altitude grid.
    [Show full text]
  • (EU) 2018/336 of 8 March 2018 Amending Regulation
    13.3.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 70/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2018/336 of 8 March 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/ EC (1), and in particular Article 18a(3)(b) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) amended Directive 2003/87/EC to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union. (2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 (3) establishes a list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006. (3) That list aims to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators by providing information on which Member State will be regulating a particular aircraft operator. (4) The inclusion of an aircraft operator in the Union’s emissions trading scheme is dependent upon the performance of an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC and is not dependent on the inclusion in the list of aircraft operators established by the Commission on the basis of Article 18a(3) of that Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Laws and Regullations of Drugs, Alcohol and Narcotics Related to Aviation Activities in Indonesia Asean and Others Countries
    International Journal of Business and Management Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 8028, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 801X www.ijbmi.org || Volume 6 Issue 4 || April. 2017 || PP—43-59 Laws and Regullations of Drugs, Alcohol and Narcotics Related to Aviation Activities in Indonesia Asean and Others Countries Dr Gunardi,1 Dr Gunawan Djajaputra2 and Prof.Dr.Martono3 ABSTRACT: This article purported to describe drug and alcohol regulation provided by ICAO, IATA related airport concession and lounges, boarding, passenger, behavior of passengers, Tokyo Convention of 1963, the Montreal Protocol of 2014; drug and alcohol regulations in Brunei Darusalam such as misuse of drug act and its application; in Malaysia such as act no.366 (revised-1989), powers of enforcement officer, examination of premises, aviation personnel violation of psychotropic; in Singapore such as policies of drugs consumption, misuse of drug act, the law enforcement, drug and air transportation, psychological test, penalty of drugs trafficking, strict penalty for drug possession, drug use; Thailand; The Philippine such as war on drug, the strict penalty for drug possession and use, aviation employees; others’ countries such as Australia, Portugal and the USA includes cabin crew’s training related to drug, testing of aviation personnel; laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia such as legal ground of drug and alcohol, narcotics and civil aviation act, drug testing program and for commercial pilot, strict penalty, health check before flying, license revocation, air crew drug’s abuse, refusal to submit to an alcohol test, pilot license and drug or alcohol, penalty and conclusion and recommendation. Keywords: Indonesia, laws and regulations, drug, penalty I.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (Eu) 2016
    L 160/50 EN Official Journal of the European Union 17.6.2016 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/963 of 16 June 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air passengers of the identity of the operating carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/EC (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 (2) established the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union, referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. (2) In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, certain Member States and the European Aviation Safety Agency (‘EASA’) communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating that list. Relevant information was also communicated by third countries and international organ­ isations. On the basis of that information, the list should be updated. (3) The Commission informed all air carriers concerned, either directly or through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose an operating ban on them within the Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the list.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly — 40Th Session
    A40-WP/498 International Civil Aviation Organization EC/44 9/9/19 (Information paper) WORKING PAPER English only ASSEMBLY — 40TH SESSION ECONOMIC COMMISSION Agenda Item 35: Economic Development of Air Transport ROLE OF AIR TRAVEL AND GROWTH IN INDONESIA (Presented by Indonesia) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper outlines the critical role of Aviation in Indonesia and the projected traffic growth rate by the year 2030. The Assembly is invited to note that Indonesia is the largest country in Southeast Asia, and the critical role of Aviation within Indonesia, as well as the envisaged Travel Market in Indonesia by 2030. Strategic This information paper relates to Strategic Objective – Economic Development of Air Objectives: Transport. Financial This information paper has no financial implications. implications: References: A40-WP/498 - 2 - EC/44 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Republic of Indonesia is the world’s largest island country, with more than seventeen thousand islands, and at 1,904,569 square kilometres (735,358 square miles), the 14th largest by land area and the 7th largest in combined sea and land area. With over 261 million people, it is the world’s 4th most populous country as well as the most populous Muslim-majority country. 1.2 The Indonesian archipelago represents one of the most unusual areas in the world: it encompasses a major juncture of Earth’s tectonic plates, spans two faunal realms, and has for millennia served as a nexus of the peoples and cultures of Oceania and mainland Asia. These factors have created a highly diverse environment and society that sometimes seem united only by susceptibility to seismic and volcanic activity, close proximity to the sea, and a moist, tropical climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Jul O 1 2004 Libraries
    Evaluation of Regional Jet Operating Patterns in the Continental United States by Aleksandra L. Mozdzanowska Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASSACHUSETTS INSTIfUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering JUL O 1 2004 at the LIBRARIES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TCHNOLOGY AERO May 2004 @ Aleksandra Mozdzanowska. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. A uthor.............. ....... Ale andawMozdzanowska Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics A I ,,May 7, 2004 Certified by.............................................. R. John Hansman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by.......................................... Edward M. Greitzer H.N. Slater Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Department Committee on Graduate Students 1 * t eWe I 4 w 4 'It ~tI* ~I 'U Evaluation of Regional Jet Operating Patterns in the Continental United States by Aleksandra Mozdzanowska Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 7th 2004, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering Abstract Airlines are increasingly using regional jets to better match aircraft size to high value, but limited demand markets. The increase in regional jet usage represents a significant change from traditional air traffic patterns. To investigate the possible impacts of this change on the air traffic management and control systems, this study analyzed the emerging flight patterns and performance of regional jets compared to traditional jets and turboprops. This study used ASDI data, which consists of actual flight track data, to analyze flights between January 1998 and January 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Raytheon, UTC Merger to Create a ‘Giant’ by David Donald
    PUBLICATIONS Vol.50 | No.7 $9.00 JULY 2019 | ainonline.com Paris Air Show 2019 The 737 Max program received a huge vote of confidence at the Paris Air Show last month. International Airlines Group (IAG) inked a letter of intent covering 200 Max 8s and Max 10s worth more than $24 billion at list prices. CFM also signed a significant engine deal—valued at $20 billion— during the show (see page 6). For more Paris Air Show news, also see pages 8 and 10. Aircraft Quest buy expands Daher line. page 8 Airports SMO operator bulldozing excess runway. page 14 INTOSH c Avionics DAVID M DAVID Universal developing a new FMS style. page 46 Raytheon, UTC merger to create a ‘giant’ by David Donald Citing “less than 1 percent overlap” between competing against [UTC].” combined company value is $166 billion the two companies, Raytheon International Upon completion of the Raytheon/UTC and, based on 2019 sales, the new company CEO John Harris spoke at the Paris Air Show, merger, the company will become the world’s will generate $74 billion in annual revenue. dismissing concern expressed by President second-largest defense/aerospace company The company’s first CEO will be Greg Hayes, Donald Trump over the merger of his com- after Boeing, and the second largest U.S. UTC chairman and CEO, with Raytheon’s pany and United Technologies Corp. (UTC). defense contractor behind Lockheed Mar- CEO, Thomas Kennedy, becoming executive Announced on June 9, the all-stock “merger tin. Revenue will be divided roughly equally chairman. Hayes is due to become chairman of equals” will create an industrial defense/ between defense and commercial sectors.
    [Show full text]