Combined Document 08-24-2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Combined Document 08-24-2013 DISCLAIMER: This document does not meet current format guidelines Graduate School at the The University of Texas at Austin. of the It has been published for informational use only. Copyright by Elinore Ann Longobardi 2013 The Dissertation Committee for Elinore Ann Longobardi certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Main Street Remade: A Case Study of Eminent Domain Use in Port Chester, New York Committee: ___________________________________ Steven D. Hoelscher, Supervisor ___________________________________ Robert H. Abzug ___________________________________ Jeffrey L. Meikle ___________________________________ Elizabeth J. Mueller ___________________________________ Shirley E. Thompson ___________________________________ Pablo E. Vengoechea Main Street Remade: A Case Study of Eminent Domain Use in Port Chester, New York By Elinore Ann Longobardi B.A.; M.A.; M.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2013 For my mother Acknowledgements I owe many people for their help with this project. Thank you to those involved with the Port Chester redevelopment who shared their opinions and experiences with me. I used this information as background, in the reportorial sense, and it helped me to orient myself within the landscape of both Port Chester generally and the redevelopment of downtown in particular. Thank you to the staff of the archives rooms at the federal district courts in both downtown Manhattan and White Plains, who patiently wheeled out reams of case files for me day after day. Thank you to the librarians at the Port Chester- Rye Brook Public Library, who graciously permitted me to repeatedly hog the only microfilm machine and did not complain when I printed out so many articles that I broke the printer. (Again, my apologies!) Thank you to my former editor, and extraordinary journalist, Dean Starkman for giving me the files and interviews he had collected on Port Chester--from a time when he himself was considering an in-depth look at the redevelopment. I greatly benefitted from his work and expertise, and although he moved on to other projects, I still wish I could have read the resulting book. Thank you to my committee for their thoughtful responses to my work, and especially to my advisor, Steve Hoelscher, who gave me invaluable advice and support, both on this dissertation and in navigating the currents of graduate school. He fully supported me in my choice of a less traditional route, including a detour to journalism school, and it is safe to say that without him I would not have submitted this dissertation. I feel hugely v lucky to have benefited from his intelligence, patience and care for his students. On a personal note, I owe my family more than I can possibly say for all that they have done for me during my journey through graduate school. It breaks my heart that my mother, one of the most brilliant and intellectually curious people I have ever known, is not here to see me finish this work, but I know she had faith that I would. She always believed in me more than I did myself. And finally, for Ron. As always. vi Main Street Remade: A Case Study of Eminent Domain Use in Port Chester, New York Elinore Ann Longobardi Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 Supervisor: Steven D. Hoelscher In the late 1990s, looking to improve its fiscal situation, the Village of Port Chester, New York, decided to approve the redevelopment of a 27-acre site that comprised a large section of its downtown. The centerpiece of the 1999 plan was a big- box shopping center and multi-tier parking structure. To build the project, Port Chester used eminent domain to raze most of its South Main Street, along with adjacent blocks-- an area already full of small shops and businesses. The village took this action in the name of “public good,” replacing the small-scale buildings and family owned businesses with big-box retail--including Costco, a Loews multiplex, DSW shoes and Bed Bath & Beyond. The village’s goal was to replace a “blighted” area (the term a vestige of legal and rhetorical constructs surrounding mid-20th century urban renewal) with a more upscale one--bringing in, as officials saw it, more tax revenue and creating jobs. vii This dissertation examines the mechanics and the consequences of this kind of large-scale land clearance, especially in the context of a small suburban municipality. Far from being an anomaly, the Port Chester project is an example of an ongoing trend: the use of eminent domain in the service of economic development, which we can see as a kind of present-day urban renewal. viii Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................x Introduction: Welcome to Port Chester, USA ......................................................................1 Chapter 1: The Best Laid Plans ..........................................................................................49 Chapter 2: Industrialization, Land Speculation and the Structure of Early Port Chester ..76 Chapter 3: Urban Redevelopment in the Context of Political Fragmentation .................113 Chapter 4: Urban Renewal, Suburban Renewal and the Problem of Housing .................146 Chapter 5: The Politics of Urban Renewal .......................................................................188 Chapter 6: The Magic Wand of Urban Renewal ..............................................................226 Chapter 7: Be Careful What You Wish For...................................................................... 270 Conclusion: A New Model of Development.................................................................... 312 Figures: Maps, Plans, and Photographs ...........................................................................325 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................352 ix List of Figures Figure 1: Port Chester in geographic context Figure 2: Overhead views of the shopping center site in Port Chester’s downtown Figure 3: View of the Waterfront at Port Chester, looking south from Westchester Avenue Figure 4: View of the west side of South Main Street Figure 5: The two pieces of the Town of Rye and the intervening City of Rye Figure 6: Village of Port Chester zoning map Figure 7: City of Rye draft zoning map Figure 8: View of shopping center facade, looking north along South Main Street Figure 9: Entrance to shopping center parking structure from interior roadway Figure 10: Port Chester Land Company lots in 1910 and 1914 Figure 11: Industry along Port Chester’s waterfront in 1910 Figure 12: The subdivision of land behind south Main Street in the 1860s Figure 13: South Main Street in the 1880s Figure 14: North Main Street in the 1880s Figure 15: The Abendroth foundry in the 1880s Figure 16: South Main Street in the 1890s Figure 17: A section of the shopping center facade along South Main Street Figure 18: The view from the top level of the elevated parking area Figure 19: A parking lot on the top tier of one of the multi-tier parking structures Figure 20: Post-project view looking at 45 Traverse Figure 21: Post-project view looking down Traverse toward loading areas for the shopping center Figure 22: Post-project view across the street from the entrance to 45 Traverse Figure 23: A pre-project block and lot map for South Main Street Figure 24: A site plan for The Waterfront at Port Chester, from March 1999. Figure 25: A view from the ground of the waterfront edge of Costco parking lot Figure 26: The view from approximately the same point as Figure 25 but looking left, away from the water and into the Costco parking lot Figure 27: Boundaries of the Village Center Urban Renewal Plan Area and the Marina Redevelopment Urban Renewal Plan Area x Introduction: Welcome to Port Chester, USA For years shopping centers have been eroding traditional downtown commercial districts, by offering newer facilities, one-stop shopping and low prices with which small businesses struggle to compete. In Port Chester, New York, a short distance north of New York City (see figure 1), the situation was even more extreme. A new shopping center brought about the literal destruction of downtown when, just over a decade ago, the village invoked eminent domain to raze several square blocks in the center of town for it. The taking forced out small local businesses, many of them Latino-owned, and replaced them with big-box shopping and tiered parking garages. Looking at the small community of Port Chester is a way to examine the big issues involved in the process of eminent domain, because they are in especially strong relief here: Public good versus private interest. The power of corporations. The effects of deindustrialization. The unfair toll that first “urban renewal” and more recently “economic development” have taken on poor people and people of color. We can see all of this at play in the problematic transformation of Port Chester’s downtown, which can help us to understand both the changing nature of eminent domain use and the dynamics of current downtown redevelopment. The Plan In the late 1990s, looking to improve its fiscal situation, the Village of Port Chester decided to spend $100,000,000 redeveloping a 27-acre site downtown (see figure 1 2), stretching
Recommended publications
  • January/February 2011
    First-Class U.S. Postage Paid New York, NY Permit No. 4119 NYCHA Vol. 41 No. 1 www.nyc.gov/nycha January/February 2011 INSIDE Work on Federalized Developments THIS ISSUE Progresses tion and rehabilitation work has begun at all 21 developments, much to the delight of residents. Susan Lee, a resident at Rutgers Houses in Manhattan for 48 years, said she and her neighbors have dealt with leaky roofs and flooding situations in COMMUNITY CENTERS GET Journatheirl own apartments for years. FRESH PAINT: The long-term fix – replacing RESIDENTS TEAM UP With NYCHA, Habitat the worn down roofs – was not for Humanity » read more on page 5 feasible financially until now. “Since the roofs have been replaced I haven’t heard com- The Rutgers Houses (Manhattan) roof is shown in the middle of its makeover as part of the renovations being plaints about any leaky roofs,” made at the 21 developments that were federalized in 2010. said the 86-year old Mrs. Lee, Find Out How to Ensure Your a former Resident Association president and Resident Watch member since 1968. “At first tenants were a little Development Gets Its Fair Share impatient and they were exposed to some difficulties By Heidi Morales while repairs were being done, but now since the repairs, he 21 developments that were federalized in 2010 to they are more at ease.” address funding deficits for the New York City Hous- In March 2010, NYCHA completed the federalization KIDS + HOLIDAY GIFTS T ing Authority (NYCHA) are starting to see some of the of 21 developments that no longer received funding from = BIG SMILES page 9 » read more on positive results coming out of the historic plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 6,500 Section 8 Vouchers Saved
    First-Class new york city housing authority U.S. Postage Paid New York, NY Permit No. 4119 NYCHA NYCHA Vol. 40 No. 6 Journawww.nyc.gov/nycha l August 2010 INSIDE 6,500 Section 8 THIS ISSUE Vouchers Saved cooperative plan among New York City, New York State and the federal government has resulted in A Section 8 rental vouchers being restored or retained for 6,500 families. In 2009 and 2010, falling tenant contribu- tions and lower than normal attrition rates led to a budget shortfall in the New York City Housing Authority’s (NYCHA) Section 8 program and at housing authorities nationwide. In New York City, that caused approximately 2,500 rental vouchers to be withdrawn and put 4,000 families already NYCHA Chairman John B. Rhea (far right) stands with Mayor Michael R. NEW RESIDENT WATCH using the vouchers at risk of losing them. Bloomberg (far left) and officials from the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development and the federal Department PROMOTES Safety & Security at However on July 1, a plan was announced to save all of Housing and Urban Development at an affordable housing ground- Developments » read more on page 4 of the vouchers. For the 2,500 families that had vouchers breaking in the Bronx. withdrawn, 750 of them will be issued Section 8 vouchers NYCHA Section 8 participants in danger of losing their by the New York City Department of Housing Preservation vouchers to HPD, allowing HPD to use its budget reserves and Development (HPD), and another 750 will get the to relieve NYCHA of the cost of maintaining these vouchers.
    [Show full text]
  • (Government Ethics) Laws and Annual Financial Disclosure (Asset Declaration) Laws
    CITY OF NEW YORK CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BOARD Basis, Structure, and Administration of Conflicts of Interest (Government Ethics) Laws and Annual Financial Disclosure (Asset Declaration) Laws New York City October 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Introduction: Ethics/Anti-corruption Program 5 B. How to Make an Ethics Program Work 7 B. Government Ethics (Conflicts of Interest) Laws Generally 1. Government Ethics Laws: A Summary 9 2. Governmental Ethics Laws a. Purpose and Bases 15 b. Oral and Written Advice 17 c. Training and Education 18 d. Disclosure 19 e. Enforcement 21 3. Principles of Enforcement of Government Ethics Laws 22 4. Model Annual Disclosure Form 24 C. New York City Conflicts of Interest Board 1. The Board a. Structure and Function of the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board 30 b. Organization Chart of the NYC Conflicts of Interest Board 31 c. Reinvigorating an Ethics Board and the Need for Budget Protection – NYC Conflicts of Interest Board: 1993, 2001, 2004, 2005 32 d. Representatives of Foreign Governments Visiting the NYC Conflicts of Interest Board 35 ii 2. Conflicts of Interest Law & Legal Advice a. NYC Charter Chapter 68 (Conflicts of Interest Law) and Rules of the NYC Conflicts of Interest Board [see separate booklets] b. Code of Ethics: A Plain Language Version of New York City’s Conflicts of Interest Law [see pages 28-29 above] c. Requests for Advice on Chapter 68 36 d. Responses to Requests for Advice on Chapter 68 37 e. Sample Advisory Opinion of the NYC Conflicts of Interest Board (Advisory Opinion No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sfy 2003-2004 Legislative Initiative Form
    SFY 2003-2004 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE FORM Legal Name, Address, and Telephone Number: CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK 160 CONVENT AVENUE, SHEPARD HALL ROOM 2 NEW YORK, NY 10027 (212) 650-6605 Name of Project Director: SHARON MACKEY-MCGEE Purpose of Project: FUNDS WILL BE USED TO SUPPORT THE PROGRAMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DIVISION OF CONTINUING AND PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TESTING RESOURCE CENTER, WHICH ENABLES CHILDREN TO ATTEND CLASSES TO PREP FOR HIGHER SAT SCORES. Funded Amount: $5,000 Requested By: WRIGHT Name of Administering State Agency: CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK SFY 2003-2004 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE FORM Legal Name, Address, and Telephone Number: HARRIET AND KENNETH KUPFERBERG HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER AND ARCHIVES 222-05 56TH AVENUE, A-202 BAYSIDE, NY 11364 (718) 281-5770 Name of Project Director: DAN LESHEM Purpose of Project: FUNDS WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE PROGRAMS THAT EDUCATE THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE RAMIFICATIONS OF PREJUDICE, RACISM AND STEREOTYPING. Funded Amount: $2,500 Requested By: WEPRIN-D Name of Administering State Agency: CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK SFY 2003-2004 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE FORM Legal Name, Address, and Telephone Number: QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE AUXILIARY ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATION, INC. 222-05 56TH AVENUE BAYSIDE, NY 11364 (718) 631-6387 Name of Project Director: SUSAN AGIN Purpose of Project: FUNDS WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE IN-STATE BUS TRIPS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS AND DISABLED INDIVIDUALS RESIDING IN QUEENS TO ENJOY AND PARTICIPATE IN CULTURAL PROGRAMS. Funded Amount: $2,500 Requested By: WEPRIN-D Name of Administering State Agency: CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK SFY 2006-2007 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE FORM Legal Name, Address, and Telephone Number: CREATIVE ARTS TEAM, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2016 Inside This Issue 3 4 5
    VOL. 46 NO. 5 JULY 2016 INSIDE THIS ISSUE 3 4 5 Randolph Mayor Talks Houses When Smaller Safety Makeover Is Better Joseph Kemp: The Voice of Youth on Public Safety Playing with PALs NYCHA’S NEWLY FORMED Public Safety Advisory A new court Committee, which brings together residents and management with the NYPD and other commu- at Frederick nity partners to make communities safer, held its first meeting in June. At the table was 21-year-old Samuel Joseph Kemp, appointed to the committee after a citywide search for a NYCHA resident to represent Houses will public housing tenants. A resident of Queensbridge Houses since the age of 6, this aspiring attorney see plenty is passionate about making NYCHA communities of action safer for everyone. “I joined the Public Safety Advisory Committee this summer because I see the issues that occur in my neighbor- hood, and I want to be able to make an impact in T WAS CLOSE, but the correcting them,” Mr. Kemp explains. “I want to Kids beat the Cops. On make our communities safer, for both residents and I June 7, youth from the visitors. Every community has its issues, problems Frederick E. Samuel Com- that can be fixed, and with this opportunity, I can munity Center’s basketball help solve some of those problems.” team beat NYPD officers He seeks to bring a young person’s perspective to 62-52 at the first basketball the committee’s work, believing that “Education for game held in the center’s youth is a key way to promote public safety.
    [Show full text]
  • NYCHA-Now-March-2017.Pdf
    Mayor Invests $1 Billion for Roof Repairs in our efforts to address mold, because roofs protect not just eventually saving the City the exterior but the interior of money later down the line so the building, too.” that we can further improve “Since work has started NYCHA housing.” and several roofs have been “This historic commit- completed, the number of ment is about more than just work orders created to fix bricks and mortar, it’s about damage from leaks is drasti- investing in New York City’s cally reduced,” said Parkside working families and our City’s Houses Resident Building most vulnerable. Now more Superintendent Shannon Mayor Bill de Blasio announces the start of the $87 Million Queensbridge than ever, critical infrastruc- Bachelder. “The residents Houses roof replacement. To his right are General Manager Michael ture upgrades are vital as really appreciate the work and Kelly and City councilmember Jimmy Van Bramer. we continue to implement are excited to have no more NextGeneration NYCHA, our leaks.” Mayor Bill de Blasio committed 729 roofs at 84 developments long-term strategic plan to Parkside Houses Resident $1 billion in City capital to and begin in 2019. The total create safe, clean and con- Association President Lilithe replace deteriorating roofs on allocation will benefit over nected public housing,” Chair Lozano remarked, “This ac- NYCHA buildings over the 175,000 public housing resi- Shola Olatoye said. “Roof complishment shows what we next 10 years. When coupled dents across the five boroughs. repair and replacement is the can do with the Chair’s atten- with Mayor de Blasio’s 2015 “This crucial investment— single most important step tiveness to our concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed City Fiscal Year 2017 Community Development Program
    PROPOSED CITY FISCAL YEAR 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROPOSED CFY 2017 BUDGET PROPOSED REALLOCATION OF CD 42 FUNDS PROPOSED CD 43 BUDGET April 26, 2016 THE CITY OF NEW YORK BILL de BLASIO, MAYOR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIT CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PROPOSED CITY FISCAL YEAR 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Part I: Proposed City Fiscal Year 2017 CDBG Budget 2 City Fiscal Year 2017 Eligibility/National Objectives 6 Part II: Proposed Revised 2016 / CDBG Forty-Two Budget 12 Part III: Proposed 2017 / CDBG Forty-Three Budget 16 Part IV: Proposed City Fiscal Year 2017 CDBG Program Program and Project Descriptions 20 Housing Programs 20 Economic Development Programs 38 Service Programs 43 Education Programs 57 Landmarks Preservation and Cultural Affairs Programs 58 Public Facilities & Improvements Programs 61 Planning Programs 67 Administration 75 i PROPOSED CITY FISCAL YEAR 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAMS Housing Programs 20 Housing Assistance 20 HPD Emergency Shelters 20 Code Enforcement 21 Targeted Code Enforcement 21 Litigation 24 Neighborhood Preservation Consultants 26 Rehabilitation 27 Emergency Repair Program 27 Alternative Enforcement Program 29 7A Program 30 Primary Prevention Program 31 Project Open House 32 Clearance 32 Demolition Program 32 Maintenance and Operation of Tax-Foreclosed Housing 33 Maintenance and Operation of Tax-Foreclosed Housing 33 Fair Housing 35 HPD Fair Housing Services Program 35 Administration 36 HPD
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Participation Plan for Kristal Auto Mall
    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Brownfield Cleanup Program Citizen Participation Plan for Kristal Auto Mall 5200 Kings Highway East Flatbush Brooklyn, New York 11234 July 2012 ICP1575.0002Y.105/CPP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 WHAT IS NEW YORK’S BROWNFIELD CLEANUP PROGRAM? ....................................1 2.0 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES .............................................................................2 3.0 MAJOR ISSUES OF PUBLIC CONCERN .............................................................................7 4.0 SITE INFORMATION .............................................................................................................8 5.0 INVESTIGATION AND CLEANUP PROCESS ..................................................................10 APPENDIX A – PROJECT CONTACTS AND LOCATIONS OF REPORTS AND INFORMATION ......................................................................................14 APPENDIX B – SITE CONTACT LIST ......................................................................................15 APPENDIX C – SITE LOCATION MAP.....................................................................................16 APPENDIX D – BROWNFIELD CLEANUP PROGRAM PROCESS .......................................17 Note: The information presented in this Citizen Participation Plan was current as of the date of its approval by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Portions of this Citizen Participation Plan may be revised during the Site’s investigation and cleanup
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn Borough President Recommendation CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 120 Broadway, 31St Floor, New York, NY 10271 [email protected]
    Brooklyn Borough President Recommendation CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 120 Broadway, 31st Floor, New York, NY 10271 [email protected] INSTRUCTIONS 1. Return this completed form with any attachments to the Calendar Information Office, City Planning Commission, Room 2E at the above address. 2. Send one copy with any attachments to the applicant’s representatives as indicated on the Notice of Certification. APPLICATION 1427 RALPH AVENUE – 210106 PCK An application submitted by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) and the New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services (DCAS), pursuant to Section 197-c of the New York City Charter, for the site selection and acquisition of an approximately 67,770 square-foot (sq. ft.), M1-1 zoned property located at 1427 Ralph Avenue, to be used as a pest and vector control program facility in Brooklyn Community District 18 (CD 18). BROOKLYN COMMUNITY DISTRICT NO. 18 BOROUGH OF BROOKLYN RECOMMENDATION APPROVE DISAPPROVE APPROVE WITH DISAPPROVE WITH MODIFICATIONS/CONDITIONS MODIFICATIONS/CONDITIONS SEE ATTACHED April 13, 2021 BROOKLYN BOROUGH PRESIDENT DATE RECOMMENDATION FOR: 1427 RALPH AVENUE – 210106 PCK The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) and the New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services (DCAS) submitted an application pursuant to Section 197-c of the New York City Charter, for the site selection and acquisition of an approximately 67,770 square-foot (sq. ft.), M1-1 zoned property located at 1427 Ralph Avenue, to be used as a pest and vector control program facility in Brooklyn Community District 18 (CD 18). On March 22, 2021, Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams held a remote public hearing on this special permit application.
    [Show full text]
  • NYCHA Outreach Continues to Assist Residents Post-Hurricane Sandy
    First-Class U.S. Postage Paid New York, NY Permit No. 4119 NYCHA Vol. 43 No. 1 www.nyc.gov/nycha January/February 2013 NYCHA Hires Residents Post-Sandy, to the Benefit of Many $7.1 million federal grant pays for nearly 400 jobs NYCHA RESTORES Additional reporting by Eric Deutsch and Howard Silver here are many people benefitting from a $7.1 million federal grant that allowed T NYCHA to hire nearly 400 people to work on post-Hurricane Sandy recovery work at developments impacted by the storm. Residents living in impacted areas will have additional staff to clean theirJourna buildings and assist them with accessing services; l the newly hired employees have jobs; and NYCHA will be able to accomplish more in a shorter amount of time. “When I found out about this, I thought it was a great opportunity to extend my- self to help my neighbors and people in distress,” said Benardo Castro from Jefferson Houses in Manhattan. More than half of the hired workers are NYCHA residents, many of whom lost their jobs as a direct result of Hurricane Sandy. The jobs are funded by a National Emergency Grant from the U.S. Department of Labor that lasts for up to six months. NYCHA was assisted in hiring workers by the New York City Department of Small Business Services (SBS) through its Workforce1 program. Nearly 2,000 people at five events applied for NYCHA jobs funded with a federal grant, including at “I’m glad for this opportunity with good pay. It’s good to pick people with expe- the O’Dwyer Community Center in Brooklyn on December 12, 2012, where people started lining up at 5:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsline Template
    Local 237 NEWSLINE HERHO OT O R D B O L F A T N E O A I M T A S T N E R R E S T N I December 2013/January 2014 Vol. 47, No. 6 R HIn hois inapugurael speesch on Nfew oHalrl just baefore ElNectioneDay two “Get Progressive Era Year’s Day, Mayor Bill de Blasio re - Out the Vote” for de Blasio for mayor. newed his campaign vow to “take Addressing New Yorkers for the dead aim at the Tale of Two Cities.” first time, Mayor de Blasio noted This tale of income inequality has early in his inaugural speech that mu - been true for at least a generation of nicipal workers are essential to a New Yorkers living in a city where a well-run city. “We recognize a city minority of people are gaining un - government’s first responsibilities,” precedented wealth while the major - said de Blasio, “to keep our neighbor - ity are losing ground financially. The hoods safe; to keep our streets clean; Labor Movement has fought tireless - to ensure that those who live here — ly against such injustice, but with de and those who visit — can get where Blasio, our first liberal mayor in 20 they need to go in every borough.” years, we have a formidable ally on That mission “reaches deeper,” the front lines of the War on Workers. added de Blasio, who as the city’s “It’s time we have a mayor with a 109th mayor advanced his over - strong record of working with unions whelming mandate to pursue a Pro - and a firm commitment to work with gressive agenda to end income in - them in the future,” said President equality that puts 46 percent of New Gregory Floyd as he stood with many Yorkers on or near the poverty level, New York City union leaders and the and 50,000, a record number, in home - rank-and-file at a Labor Unity Rally on the steps of Brooklyn Borough Continued on page 5 The Labor Movementʼs rank-and-file stands behind then mayoral candidate Bill de Blasio at a Labor Unity Rally at Brooklyn Borough Hall on Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Stevens & the Charmers
    Mark Stevens & the Charmers By Charlie Horner With Contributions from Pamela Horner vocal groups to date. And we'll start with Ray's first vocal group, Mark Stevens & the Charmers. Ray Block was born in Brooklyn in 1946, but moved with his family to Bayonne NJ at a young age. By the early 1960's Ray was listening to groups like Shep & the Limelites, the Flamingos and Ruby & the Romantics on NYC radio, while at- tending shows at the Brooklyn Paramount and Brooklyn Fox Theaters. Ray was attending Bayonne High School when he met a young Mark Stein. [Mark Stein would later go on to form the hugely successful rock group, Vanilla Fudge.] Mark Stein, also born and raised in Bayonne, grew up in a musical family. He report- edly performed on the Startime TV show at the age of four. As he told interviewer Russell Tice, "My mom used to sing on the radio when she was a teen- Ray Block singing with the Vic Donna ager, you know, when there was just radio. My Group at Charlie & Pam Horner’s mom was a singer and my dad used to play the pi- Doo Wop Explosion, 2016. ano and the violin. Yeah, I picked up this and that, Photo courtesy of Ray Block it got me on that TV thing when I was a little kid. I used to remember going over to my uncle's house. Certain geographic areas, over certain time He used to play piano, it was like, I was four years periods, have given rise to an extraordinarily high old and I used to start picking melodies out on the number of talented R&B vocal groups.
    [Show full text]