July 2016 Inside This Issue 3 4 5
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cohort 20 Graduation Celebration Ceremony February 7, 2020
COHORT 20 GRADUATION CELEBRATION CEREMONY FEBRUARY 7, 2020 Green City Force is an AmeriCorps program CONGRATULATIONS TO THE GRADUATES OF COHORT 20! WELCOME! Welcome to the graduation celebration for Green City Force’s (GCF) 20th Cohort! Green City Force’s AmeriCorps program prepares young adults, aged 18-24, who reside at NYCHA and have a high school diploma or equivalency for careers through green service. Being part of the Service Corps is a full-time commitment encompass- ing service, training, and skills-building experiences related to sustainable buildings and communities. GCF is committed to the ongoing success of our alumni, who num- ber nearly 550 with today’s graduates. The Corps Members of Cohort 20 represent a set of diverse experiences, hailing from 20 NYCHA developments and five boroughs. This cohort was the largest cohort as- signed to Farms at NYCHA, totaling 50 members for 8 and 6 months terms of service. The Cohort exemplifies our one corps sustainable cities service in response to climate resilience and community cohesion through environmental stewardship, building green infrastructure and urban farming, and resident education at NYCHA. We have a holistic approach to sustainability and pride ourselves in training our corps in a vari- ety of sectors, from composting techniques and energy efficiency to behavior change outreach. Cohort 20 are exemplary leaders of sustainability and have demonstrated they can confidently use the skills they learn to make real contributions to our City. Cohort 20’s service inspired hundreds of more residents this season to be active in their developments and have set a new standard for service that we are proud to have their successors learn from and exceed for even greater impact. -
Farms at NYCHA
Farms at NYCHA Final Evaluation Report June, 2019 1 Acknowledgements This evaluation was made possible through the generous support of the New York Community Trust and Laurie M. Tisch Illumination Fund. Special thanks to the staff at partner organizations, NYCHA residents, and Green City Force Corps Members who supported this evaluation by participating in and facilitating interviews, focus groups, surveys, and site visits. Farms at NYCHA Initiative Kristine Momanyi, and Hannah Altman- NYC Office of the Mayor Kurosaki. Darren Bloch, Senior Advisor to the Mayor Tamara Greenfield, Director of Building Healthy Communities Project Partners Resident Associations New York City Housing Authority Cheryl Boyce, Resident Leader, Bayview Andrea Mata, Director for Community Houses Health Initiatives Naomi Johnson, Resident Leader, Howard Regina Ginyard, Urban Farm Project Houses Coordinator Frances Brown, Resident Leader, Red Hook East Mayor’s Fund to Advance New York City Lillie Marshall, Resident Leader, Red Hook Toya Williford, Executive Director West Leah Prestamo, Director of Programs and Katie Harris, Tenant Association President, Policy Wagner Houses Janet Seabrook, Acting Tenant Association Fund for Public Health NYC President, Wagner Houses Sara Gardner, Executive Director Brenda Kiko Charles, Tenant Association Donna Fishman, Deputy Director President. Mariner’s Harbor Houses Erik Farmer, Tenant Association President, Green City Force Forest Houses Lisbeth Shepherd, Chief Executive Officer Tonya Gayle, Chief Development Officer Community -
January/February 2011
First-Class U.S. Postage Paid New York, NY Permit No. 4119 NYCHA Vol. 41 No. 1 www.nyc.gov/nycha January/February 2011 INSIDE Work on Federalized Developments THIS ISSUE Progresses tion and rehabilitation work has begun at all 21 developments, much to the delight of residents. Susan Lee, a resident at Rutgers Houses in Manhattan for 48 years, said she and her neighbors have dealt with leaky roofs and flooding situations in COMMUNITY CENTERS GET Journatheirl own apartments for years. FRESH PAINT: The long-term fix – replacing RESIDENTS TEAM UP With NYCHA, Habitat the worn down roofs – was not for Humanity » read more on page 5 feasible financially until now. “Since the roofs have been replaced I haven’t heard com- The Rutgers Houses (Manhattan) roof is shown in the middle of its makeover as part of the renovations being plaints about any leaky roofs,” made at the 21 developments that were federalized in 2010. said the 86-year old Mrs. Lee, Find Out How to Ensure Your a former Resident Association president and Resident Watch member since 1968. “At first tenants were a little Development Gets Its Fair Share impatient and they were exposed to some difficulties By Heidi Morales while repairs were being done, but now since the repairs, he 21 developments that were federalized in 2010 to they are more at ease.” address funding deficits for the New York City Hous- In March 2010, NYCHA completed the federalization KIDS + HOLIDAY GIFTS T ing Authority (NYCHA) are starting to see some of the of 21 developments that no longer received funding from = BIG SMILES page 9 » read more on positive results coming out of the historic plan. -
Vending Machines for NYCHA
First-Class U.S. Postage Paid New York, NY Permit No. 4119 Vol. 38, No. 3 www.nyc.gov/nycha MARCH 2008 NYCHA ADOPTS PRELIMINARY BUDGET FOR 2008 By Eileen Elliott THE NEW YORK CITY HOUSING of New York City and while we contribute to the deficit include: AUTHORITY (NYCHA) BOARD do have to make tough choices, the cost of operating 21 State and ADOPTED A $2.8 BILLION we have nearly 70 years of being City-built developments, which FISCAL YEAR 2008 PRELIMI- the first, the biggest and the best. amounts to $93 million annually; NARY OPERATING BUDGET We’ll get through this. We’ve an increase in non-discretionary ON JANUARY 23rd. The budget been through hard times before.” employee benefit expenses of $40 includes a $195 million structural million; $68 million for policing deficit, resulting in large part Chronic Federal services; and another $68 million from chronic Federal under- Underfunding for NYCHA-provided community funding. Before adopting the “NYCHA has lost over $611 and social services. budget, NYCHA Chairman Tino million in Federal aid since Hernandez vowed that the 2001,” said NYCHA Deputy Victories Housing Authority will continue General Manager for Finance “In many ways, NYCHA is to take aggressive action in the Felix Lam in his budget presenta- a victim of its own success,” coming year to preserve public tion at the meeting. He added that said Chairman Tino Hernandez, housing in New York City. the last time public housing was referring to the fact that NYCHA fully funded was in 2002. has managed to maintain its level Commitment to For 2008, the Federal subsidy of service despite nearly seven DISINVESTMENT The graph above shows the decline in Public Housing NYCHA receives will again be years of underfunding. -
6,500 Section 8 Vouchers Saved
First-Class new york city housing authority U.S. Postage Paid New York, NY Permit No. 4119 NYCHA NYCHA Vol. 40 No. 6 Journawww.nyc.gov/nycha l August 2010 INSIDE 6,500 Section 8 THIS ISSUE Vouchers Saved cooperative plan among New York City, New York State and the federal government has resulted in A Section 8 rental vouchers being restored or retained for 6,500 families. In 2009 and 2010, falling tenant contribu- tions and lower than normal attrition rates led to a budget shortfall in the New York City Housing Authority’s (NYCHA) Section 8 program and at housing authorities nationwide. In New York City, that caused approximately 2,500 rental vouchers to be withdrawn and put 4,000 families already NYCHA Chairman John B. Rhea (far right) stands with Mayor Michael R. NEW RESIDENT WATCH using the vouchers at risk of losing them. Bloomberg (far left) and officials from the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development and the federal Department PROMOTES Safety & Security at However on July 1, a plan was announced to save all of Housing and Urban Development at an affordable housing ground- Developments » read more on page 4 of the vouchers. For the 2,500 families that had vouchers breaking in the Bronx. withdrawn, 750 of them will be issued Section 8 vouchers NYCHA Section 8 participants in danger of losing their by the New York City Department of Housing Preservation vouchers to HPD, allowing HPD to use its budget reserves and Development (HPD), and another 750 will get the to relieve NYCHA of the cost of maintaining these vouchers. -
Download The
ASSEMBLY MEMBER Reports to the People Fall 2017 5318 Avenue N, 1st Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11234 • 718-252-2124 Room 523 LOB, Albany, New York 12248 • 518-455-5211 • [email protected] ASSEMBLY MEMBER’S MESSAGE It was just a short five years ago that Super Storm Sandy de- stroyed so much of our district. The five year anniversary of Super Storm Sandy has just occurred and in light of the recent hurricane that plagued the Caribbean, I believe we should take note of how we helped one another during Sandy. At that time I was work- ing as a social worker for Catholic Charities and I witnessed the residents of Canarsie, Coney Island and Far Rockaway trying to resume their lives. The lessons of Super Storm Sandy will remain, and we are always going to be looked to for assistance in helping overcome tragedies as this is a cornerstone of our great 59th As- sembly District. RECENT LEGISLATION Assembly passes extender of ticket resale law – protecting the consumers and residents of New York “On the turn of a dime the technology utilized to sell tickets practice. Bill A7701 allows accommodating for the market as it for entertainment venues changes, without proper safety protocols evolves; ensuring the protection of consumers and their rights. in place the average consumer becomes a target and a victim, a This legislation allows for additional time to fully understand the practice I will not allow on my watch,” remarked Assembly Mem- effects that new technologies and other developments, with respect ber Williams. Assembly Member Williams brought to fruition to ticket sales, will have on the industry and consumers alike. -
Nourishing NYCHA: Food Policy As a Tool for Improving the Well-Being of New York City’S Public Housing Residents February 2017
Nourishing NYCHA: Food Policy as a Tool for Improving the Well-Being of New York City’s Public Housing Residents February 2017 By Nevin Cohen, Nick Freudenberg, and Craig Willingham, CUNY Urban Food Policy Institute In the last few years, NYCHA has attracted the attention of policy makers, developers, elected officials and activists seeking new ways to improve living conditions, enhance public safety, repair an aging infrastructure, encourage economic development and promote health in the city-within-a-city that New York’s public housing constitutes. In this policy brief, we consider another aspect of NYCHA: the food its residents buy, prepare and eat and the role food plays in the health, environment and economy of the city’s NYCHA population. Our goal is to contribute new insights into how NYCHA can use food policy and programs to improve the well-being of its residents and make our city healthier, more self-sufficient, safer and more sustainable. More specifically, we hope to identify what NYCHA is doing now and what it 1-Credit: NYU-CUNY Prevention Research Center, Reference 4 55 West 125th Street, 6th Floor New York, NY 10027 (646) 364-9602 [email protected] www.cunyurbanfoodpolicy.org 1 could be doing in the coming years to reduce food insecurity, diet-related health conditions and promote food-related economic development, employment and sustainability. Why Food at NYCHA? The starting point of any investigation of NYCHA properly begins with the people who live there. What is known about the health status of NYCHA’s public housing community? Health and Diet in NYCHA Residents High death rates from diet-related chronic diseases. -
The Commoditization of Starbucks[Electronic Version]
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University Cornell University School of Hotel Administration The Scholarly Commons Articles and Chapters School of Hotel Administration Collection 2010 The ommoC ditization of Starbucks Cathy A. Enz Cornell University School of Hotel Administration, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles Part of the Food and Beverage Management Commons Recommended Citation Enz, C. A. (2010). The commoditization of Starbucks[Electronic version]. Retrieved [insert date] from Cornell University, School of Hotel Administration site: http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/609 This Article or Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Hotel Administration Collection at The choS larly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles and Chapters by an authorized administrator of The choS larly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The ommoC ditization of Starbucks Abstract [Excerpt] Is the coffee empire that Starbucks built beginning to fall? In a memo sent to the senior management of the company in February 2007, Howard Schultz warned that Starbucks was in danger of losing its romance and theater, which he believes are fundamental to the Starbucks experience. He noted, “Over the past ten years in order to achieve the growth, development, and scale necessary to go from less than 1,000 stores to 13,000 stores and beyond, we have had to make a series of decisions that, in retrospect, have led to the watering down of the Starbucks experience, and, what some might call the commoditization of our brand.” Calling the memo subject “The ommodC itization of the Starbucks Experience,” Schultz questioned corporate decisions to use automatic espresso machines and eliminate some in-store coffee grinding. -
(Government Ethics) Laws and Annual Financial Disclosure (Asset Declaration) Laws
CITY OF NEW YORK CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BOARD Basis, Structure, and Administration of Conflicts of Interest (Government Ethics) Laws and Annual Financial Disclosure (Asset Declaration) Laws New York City October 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Introduction: Ethics/Anti-corruption Program 5 B. How to Make an Ethics Program Work 7 B. Government Ethics (Conflicts of Interest) Laws Generally 1. Government Ethics Laws: A Summary 9 2. Governmental Ethics Laws a. Purpose and Bases 15 b. Oral and Written Advice 17 c. Training and Education 18 d. Disclosure 19 e. Enforcement 21 3. Principles of Enforcement of Government Ethics Laws 22 4. Model Annual Disclosure Form 24 C. New York City Conflicts of Interest Board 1. The Board a. Structure and Function of the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board 30 b. Organization Chart of the NYC Conflicts of Interest Board 31 c. Reinvigorating an Ethics Board and the Need for Budget Protection – NYC Conflicts of Interest Board: 1993, 2001, 2004, 2005 32 d. Representatives of Foreign Governments Visiting the NYC Conflicts of Interest Board 35 ii 2. Conflicts of Interest Law & Legal Advice a. NYC Charter Chapter 68 (Conflicts of Interest Law) and Rules of the NYC Conflicts of Interest Board [see separate booklets] b. Code of Ethics: A Plain Language Version of New York City’s Conflicts of Interest Law [see pages 28-29 above] c. Requests for Advice on Chapter 68 36 d. Responses to Requests for Advice on Chapter 68 37 e. Sample Advisory Opinion of the NYC Conflicts of Interest Board (Advisory Opinion No. -
Sfy 2003-2004 Legislative Initiative Form
SFY 2003-2004 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE FORM Legal Name, Address, and Telephone Number: CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK 160 CONVENT AVENUE, SHEPARD HALL ROOM 2 NEW YORK, NY 10027 (212) 650-6605 Name of Project Director: SHARON MACKEY-MCGEE Purpose of Project: FUNDS WILL BE USED TO SUPPORT THE PROGRAMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DIVISION OF CONTINUING AND PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE TESTING RESOURCE CENTER, WHICH ENABLES CHILDREN TO ATTEND CLASSES TO PREP FOR HIGHER SAT SCORES. Funded Amount: $5,000 Requested By: WRIGHT Name of Administering State Agency: CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK SFY 2003-2004 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE FORM Legal Name, Address, and Telephone Number: HARRIET AND KENNETH KUPFERBERG HOLOCAUST RESOURCE CENTER AND ARCHIVES 222-05 56TH AVENUE, A-202 BAYSIDE, NY 11364 (718) 281-5770 Name of Project Director: DAN LESHEM Purpose of Project: FUNDS WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE PROGRAMS THAT EDUCATE THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE RAMIFICATIONS OF PREJUDICE, RACISM AND STEREOTYPING. Funded Amount: $2,500 Requested By: WEPRIN-D Name of Administering State Agency: CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK SFY 2003-2004 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE FORM Legal Name, Address, and Telephone Number: QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE AUXILIARY ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATION, INC. 222-05 56TH AVENUE BAYSIDE, NY 11364 (718) 631-6387 Name of Project Director: SUSAN AGIN Purpose of Project: FUNDS WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE IN-STATE BUS TRIPS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS AND DISABLED INDIVIDUALS RESIDING IN QUEENS TO ENJOY AND PARTICIPATE IN CULTURAL PROGRAMS. Funded Amount: $2,500 Requested By: WEPRIN-D Name of Administering State Agency: CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK SFY 2006-2007 LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE FORM Legal Name, Address, and Telephone Number: CREATIVE ARTS TEAM, INC. -
2017 Annual Report
RE: Edits for Annual Report FACING HUNGER2017 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ANNUAL REPORT | FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY A 2017 BOARD OF DIRECTORS REVEREND HENRY BELIN (Chair) KATIE LEE MICHAEL SMITH PASTOR CHEF/AUTHOR GENERAL MANAGER Bethel AME Church The Comfort Table Cooking Channel MARIO BATALI SERAINA MACIA ARTHUR STAINMAN (Treasurer) CHEF/AUTHOR/RESTAURATEUR EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & CEO SENIOR MANAGING DIRECTOR First Manhattan KEVIN FRISZ AIG MANAGING PARTNER GLORIA PITAGORSKY (Vice Chair) LARY STROMFELD William James Capital MANAGING DIRECTOR (Executive Vice Chair) Heard City PARTNER JOHN F. FRITTS, ESQ. (Secretary) Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP SENIOR COUNSEL NICOLAS POITEVIN Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP SENIOR TRADER STANLEY TUCCI Latour Trading ACTOR/DIRECTOR LAUREN BUSH LAUREN Olive Productions C/O Post Factory CEO & FOUNDER LEE SCHRAGER FEED VICE PRESIDENT, CORPORATE PASTOR MICHAEL WALROND COMMUNICATIONS & NATIONAL EVENTS SENIOR PASTOR Southern Glazer’s Wine & Spirits First Corinthian Baptist Church Kelly Bensimon Tony Shaloub David Chang Kate Krader AGENCY ACTOR, MODEL ACTOR CHEF, AUTHOR BLOOMBERG ADVISORY Lorraine Bracco Ahmir “Questlove” Thompson Caryl Chinn Gabriel Kreuther COMMITTEE ACTOR MUSICIAN, RESTAURATEUR, CARYL CHINN CULINARY CHEF, RESTAURATEUR AUTHOR CONSULTING Robin Sirota-Bassin Ty Burrell Emeril Lagasse Tom Colicchio SOUTHSIDE UNITED HDFC INC. ACTOR CHEF, TV HOST, AUTHOR CHEF, TV HOST, AUTHOR Cheryl Cancela Helena Christensen CULINARY Katie Lee Gabriele Corcos THE SALVATION ARMY STAPLETON MODEL, PHOTOGRAPHER -
Table of Contents
Southern Brooklyn Transportation Investment Study Kings County, New York P.I.N. X804.00; D007406 Technical Memorandum #2 Existing Conditions DRAFT June 2003 Submitted to: New York Metropolitan Transportation Council Submitted by: Parsons Brinckerhoff In association with: Cambridge Systematics, Inc. SIMCO Engineering, P.C. Urbitran Associates, Inc. Zetlin Strategic Communications TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... ES-1 A. TRANSIT SYSTEM USAGE AND OPERATION.................................................................. ES-1 B. GOODS MOVEMENT...................................................................................................... ES-2 C. SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS ..................................................................................... ES-4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .................................................................................... ES-5 E. ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY.............................................................................................. ES-5 F. PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION.................................................................... ES-6 CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................I-1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................I-1 B. PROJECT OVERVIEW..........................................................................................................I-1