DOCSLIB.ORG

Implications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Implications Kyrgyzstan 2010: Conflict and Context Shirin Akiner © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka 13130, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Kyrgyzstan 2010: Conflict and Context” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based In- stitute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of the author only, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Joint Center or its sponsors. © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, 2016 ISBN: 978-91-86635-94-7 Printed in Singapore Distributed in North America by: The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Tel. +1-202-663-7723; Fax. +1-202-663-7785 E-mail: [email protected] Distributed in Europe by: The Silk Road Studies Program Institute for Security and Development Policy V. Finnbodavägen 2, SE-13130 Stockholm-Nacka E-mail: [email protected] Editorial correspondence should be addressed to Alec Forss, Editor, at the European offices of the Joint Center (preferably by e-mail.) Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 10 Part I: Context ........................................................................................................................... 12 Socio-Economic Factors .................................................................................................... 12 Weak Governance ............................................................................................................ 13 Flawed Economic Reforms .............................................................................................. 15 Failing Social Services, Youth Alienation ...................................................................... 17 Crime and Corruption .................................................................................................... 18 Islam and Islamist Radicalization ................................................................................... 21 Erosion of Civic Identity ................................................................................................. 25 North/South Divide ........................................................................................................ 27 A Conflicted Society ......................................................................................................... 31 Osh Province, May-June 1990 ....................................................................................... 31 Batken Province, 1999-2000 ........................................................................................... 33 Aksy, 2002 ...................................................................................................................... 35 Jalal-Abad, 2005 .............................................................................................................. 36 Geo-Political Trends 1992-2010 ....................................................................................... 37 Uzbekistan ....................................................................................................................... 38 United States................................................................................................................... 39 Russia .............................................................................................................................. 41 Towards the Closure of Manas ....................................................................................... 43 China ............................................................................................................................... 48 Part II: Conflict ......................................................................................................................... 50 From Public Anger to Protests to Deadly Clashes ...................................................... 50 April ................................................................................................................................ 52 May ................................................................................................................................. 53 June ................................................................................................................................. 54 External Responses ............................................................................................................ 56 Humanitarian Assistance ............................................................................................... 56 Evacuation of Foreign Nationals .................................................................................... 57 Regional Organizations .................................................................................................. 57 Strategic Partners and Regional Neighbors ................................................................... 60 Counting the Cost ........................................................................................................... 63 Part III: Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 65 Victims and Assailants ..................................................................................................... 65 Salient Features of the Conflict ...................................................................................... 66 Conspiracy Theories ......................................................................................................... 68 Great Power Rivalry ....................................................................................................... 69 The ‘Third Force’ ............................................................................................................. 73 Civil Society, Media and Rumor .................................................................................... 75 Citizen Militias .................................................................................................................. 77 Official Reports and Reactions ....................................................................................... 78 Part IV: Post-Conflict Trends ............................................................................................... 83 Renewing the Political Process ....................................................................................... 83 Elections .......................................................................................................................... 84 New Constitution, Old Tensions .................................................................................... 88 Islamist Radicalization .................................................................................................... 93 The Changing Geopolitical Environment .................................................................... 98 Uzbekistan ....................................................................................................................... 99 United States................................................................................................................. 100 Russia ............................................................................................................................ 103 Bishkek’s Pivot to Asia .................................................................................................. 109 2010: A Turning Point – or Not? ....................................................................................... 119 Annex 1: Chronicle of Events, January-July 2010 ............................................ 126 Annex 2: Biographical Notes ............................................................................... 136 Author Bio ............................................................................................................................... 142 Executive Summary In 2010, Kyrgyzstan was convulsed by civil strife. The conflict made headline news around
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy, Wealth and Governance in the Caucasus and Central Asia
    Energy, Wealth and Governance in the Caucasus and Central Asia In 1991 the eight countries of the Caucasus and Central Asia (CCA) became independent from the former Soviet Union. Although a region rich in natural resources, the transition toward a market economy has not gone smoothly for the CCA countries. Drawing upon recent progress in development economics and political science, the book provides fresh analysis of the CCA countries’ transition by tracing the impact of the natural resource endowment. The book examines the synergies between energy-rich and energy-poor states and highlights the practical consequences of both well-managed and poorly-managed energy revenue deployment. The region has been a relatively slow reformer, its governments have become more authoritarian, and the contributors argue that despite recent growth spurts, further reform is required to sustain rapid GDP growth and nurture democracy. They suggest that unless CCA elites change the way in which they deploy natural resource revenues, regional development will fall short of its potential with possibly disastrous consequences. The contributors apply the experience of the developing market economies to demonstrate that the region still holds considerable potential to become an important stable supplier of raw materials and a source of industrial demand to the global economy. However, the CCA could become a threat to the global economy as a consequence of the misuse of energy revenues in promoting the interests of predatory political elites. With contributions from prominent specialists on resource-driven econ- omies Energy, Wealth and Governance in the Caucasus and Central Asia pro- vides a systematic and integrated analysis of the political economy of resource-driven growth in the CCA region.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Report
    Human Rights Watch September 2005 Vol. 17, No. 6(D) Burying the Truth Uzbekistan Rewrites the Story of the Andijan Massacre Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology and a Note on the Use of Pseudonyms ............................................................ 7 Background .................................................................................................................................... 7 The Andijan Uprising, Protests, and Massacre..................................................................... 7 Early Post-massacre Cover-up and Intimidation of Witnesses ......................................... 9 The Criminal Investigation into the Andijan Events ........................................................ 10 Uzbek Media Coverage of the Andijan Events.................................................................. 13 Coercive Pressure for Testimony .............................................................................................14 Detention and Abuse in Andijan.......................................................................................... 16 Initial Detention...................................................................................................................... 17 Interrogations .......................................................................................................................... 18 Misdemeanor Hearings and Detention...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Central Asian Perspective of Security in Afghanistan
    A Central Asian Perspective of Security in Afghanistan By Matthew Stein The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. government. A Central Asian Perspective of Security in Afghanistan In the ten years since the start of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) the five Central Asian countries (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) contributed support for International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) operations by granting overflight rights and use of airfields for transit or search and rescue operations, and allowing overland logistics of non-lethal supplies.1 The drawdown of forces in 2014 from Afghanistan will affect the conduct of regional affairs and regional security, particularly for the countries of Central Asia. However, Central Asian perspectives of the future of Afghanistan are often overlooked. There are a number of articles by security analysts and academics in Central Asia that offer detailed and candid perspectives of ISAF operations and security in Afghanistan, though these may not be noticed or well received by policy-makers in the United States. A brief examination of articles by one such author, Dr. Viktor Dubovitsky, can help better understand the Central Asian perspective of security in Afghanistan. It is also worth comparing Dubovitsky’s thoughts with an official perspective. Dr. Dubovitsky is the Deputy Director of the Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan and has written several articles that present a Central Asian perspective of operations in Afghanistan and the withdrawal of combat forces from there in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia and the Caucasus: a Vulnerable Crescent
    Central Asia and the Caucasus: A Vulnerable Crescent Coping with Crisis Working Paper Series Thomas de Waal and Anna Matveeva February 2007 International Peace Academy About the Author Thomas de Waal is Caucasus Editor at the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, London and writes about the Caucasus and Russia. He completed a degree in Russian and Modern Greek at Oxford, before working for the BBC, The Moscow Times and The Times in London and Moscow. He is co-author with Carlotta Gall of Chechnya: A Small Victorious War, and is author of Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War, the first thorough book in English about the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. He writes and broadcasts for a number of media outlets. Anna Matveeva is an Associate Fellow at the Crisis States Research Centre at the London School of Economics. She has previously worked as a UNDP Regional Adviser on Peace and Development for Central Asia, and as a Research Fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. She has published extensively, including a Chaillot Paper for the EU Institute for Security Studies on the “EU Stakes in Central Asia,” a Chatham House Paper on “The North Caucasus: Russia’s Fragile Borderland,” and a recent report for International Alert on “Central Asia: Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding.” Acknowledgements IPA owes a great debt of thanks to its many donors to Coping with Crisis. Their support for this Program reflects a widespread demand for innovative thinking on practical solutions to international challenges. In particular, IPA is grateful to the Governments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence in Andijan, 13 May 2005: an Independent Assessment
    VViiiiooollleeennncccee iiinin AAnnndddiiiijjjaaannn,, 13 May 2005: An Independent AAssessmentssessment Shirin Akiner SILK ROAD PAPER July 2005 Violence in Andijan, 13 May 2005: An Independent Assessment Shirin Akiner © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Uppsala University, Box 514, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Violence in Andijan, 13 May 2005” is a Silk Road Paper produced by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program. The Silk Road Papers series is the Occasional Papers series of the Joint Center, published jointly on topical and timely subjects. It is edited by Svante E. Cornell, Research and Publications Director of the Joint Center. The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program are a joint transatlantic independent and privately funded research and policy center. The Joint Center has offices in Washington and Uppsala, and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Department of East European Studies and Peace and Conflict Research of Uppsala University. It is the first Institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is today firmly established as a leading focus of research and policy worldwide, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders and journalists. The Joint Center aims to be at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security and development in the region; and to function as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion of the region through its applied research, its publications, teaching, research cooperation, public lectures and seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Central Asian Military and Security Activity
    WL KNO EDGE NCE ISM SA ER IS E A TE N K N O K C E N N T N I S E S J E N A 3 V H A A N H Z И O E P W O I T E D N E Z I A M I C O N O C C I O T N S H O E L C A I N M Z E N O T Compendium of Central Asian Military and Security Activity MATTHEW STEIN Open Source, Foreign Perspective, Underconsidered/Understudied Topics The Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, is an open source research organization of the U.S. Army. It was founded in 1986 as an innovative program that brought together military specialists and civilian academics to focus on military and security topics derived from unclassified, foreign media. Today FMSO maintains this research tradition of special insight and highly collaborative work by conducting unclassified research on foreign perspectives of defense and security issues that are understudied or unconsidered. Author Background Matthew Stein is an analyst at the Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. His specific research expertise includes “Joint military exercises involving Central Asian militaries and security forces,” “Incidents of violence and civil unrest in Central Asia,” “Extremist and Terrorist Groups in Central Asia,” and “Border issues in Central Asia.” He has conducted briefings and participated in training events for units deploying to the Central Asia region and seminars for senior U.S. Army leaders. He has an M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • EN: Health Care in Central Asia
    N:\EC\COM\HDS\IDP\DOCSTORE\DOCSTORE\Docs for PDF filing\Obs\Health care in central Asia.doc Health care in central Asia European Observatory on Health Care Systems Series Series Editors Josep Figueras is Head of the Secretariat and Research Director of the European Observa- tory on Health Care Systems and Head of the European Centre for Health Policy, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Martin McKee is a research director of the European Observatory on Health Care Systems and Professor of European Public Health at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine as well as a co-director of the School’s European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition. Elias Mossialos is Research Director of the European Observatory on Health Care Systems and Bnan Abel-Smith Reader in Health Policy, Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science and Co-Director of LSE Health and Social Care. Richard B. Saltman is Research Director of the European Observatory on Health Care Systems and Professor of Health Policy and Management at the Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia The series The volumes in this series focus on key issues for health policy-making in Europe. Each study explores the conceptual background, outcomes and lessons learned about the dev- elopment of more equitable, more efficient and more effective health systems in Europe. With this focus, the series seeks to contribute to the evolution of a more evidence-based approach to policy formulation in the health sector. These studies will be important to all those involved in formulating or evaluating national health care policies and, in particular, will be of use to health policy-makers and advisers, who are under increasing pressure to rationalize the structure and funding of their health systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The J Oumal Of
    The Joumal of Gemmological Association and Gem Testing Laboratory of Great Britain 27 Greville Street, London EC1N 8TN Tel: 020 7404 3334 Fax: 020 7404 8843 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.gem-a.info President: Professor A.T. Collins Vice-Presidents: N. W. Deeks, A.E. Farn, R.A. Howie, D.G. Kent, R.K. Mitchell Honorary Fellows: Chen Zhonghui, R.A. Howie, K. Nassau Honorary Life Members: H. Bank, D.J. Callaghan, E.A. Jobbins, H. Tillander Council of Management: T.J. Davidson, R.R. Harding, I. Mercer, J. Monnickendam, M.J. O'Donoghue, E. Stern, I. Thomson, V.P. Watson Members' Council: A.J. Allnutt, S. Burgoyne, P. Dwyer-Hickey, S.A. Everitt, J. Greatwood, B. Jackson, L. Music, J.B. Nelson, P.G. Read, P.J. Wates, C.H. Winter Branch Chairmen: Midlands - G.M. Green, North West - D. M. Brady, Scottish - B. Jackson, South East - C.H. Winter, South West - R.M. Slater Examiners: A.J. Allnutt, M.Sc, Ph.D., FGA, L. Bartlett, B.Sc, M.Phil., FGA, DGA, S. Coelho, B.Sc, FGA, DGA, Prof. A.T. Collins, B.Sc, Ph.D, A.G. Good, FGA, DGA, J. Greatwood, FGA, G.M. Green, FGA, DGA, G.M. Howe, FGA, DGA, S. Hue Williams MA, FGA, DGA, B. Jackson, FGA, DGA, G.H. Jones, B.Sc, Ph.D., FGA, Li Li Ping, FGA, DGA, M.A. Medniuk, FGA, DGA, M. Newton, B.Sc, D.PWL, C.J.E. Oldershaw, B.Sc. (Hans), FGA, DGA, H.L. Plumb, B.Sc, FGA, DGA, R.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence in Andijan, 13 May 2005: an Independent Assessment
    VViiiiooollleeennncccee iiinin AAnnndddiiiijjjaaannn,, 13 May 2005: An Independent AAssessmentssessment Shirin Akiner SILK ROAD PAPER July 2005 Violence in Andijan, 13 May 2005: An Independent Assessment Shirin Akiner © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Uppsala University, Box 514, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Violence in Andijan, 13 May 2005” is a Silk Road Paper produced by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program. The Silk Road Papers series is the Occasional Papers series of the Joint Center, published jointly on topical and timely subjects. It is edited by Svante E. Cornell, Research and Publications Director of the Joint Center. The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program are a joint transatlantic independent and privately funded research and policy center. The Joint Center has offices in Washington and Uppsala, and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Department of East European Studies and Peace and Conflict Research of Uppsala University. It is the first Institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is today firmly established as a leading focus of research and policy worldwide, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders and journalists. The Joint Center aims to be at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security and development in the region; and to function as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion of the region through its applied research, its publications, teaching, research cooperation, public lectures and seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Cooperation in Central Asia
    REGIONAL COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA Shirin Akiner Lecturer, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Introduction At the time of writing, slightly less than a decade has passed since the formal disintegration of the Soviet Union. The Central Asian states, in their modern form, are very new entities. Thus, they have no esta- blished strategies to guide them in responding to the challenges of an environment that, at the regional level as well as the international level, presents opportunities for development, but also threats to secu- rity and stability. Since independence, the Central Asian states have joined a wide range of international and regional organizations. The latter comprise different groupings of member states. This paper will the trace evolution of the key regional groupings and considers their aims and objectives. Most of these formations are still very new and detailed information on structures, programs and content of agree- ments is not always to be found in the public domain. Nevertheless, despite the fact that it is not as yet possible to undertake a thorough evaluation of these organizations, a descriptive overview of the current situation is useful in that it casts light on emerging trends. Defining the Region Historically speaking, 'Central Asia' is an amorphous concept.1 Since the demise of the Soviet Union, however, in international relations it has gained currency as the designation of the five newly independent states that lie to the east of the Caspian Sea, namely, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. These states are regarded as constituting a natural region, characte- rised not only by contiguity and interdependence, but also by a dense web of shared socio-cultural characteristics.2 Central Asians themselves have been enthusiastic proponents of this idea of a com- mon regional identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fault Lines of Violent Conflict in Tajikistan
    The Fault Lines of Violent Conflict in Tajikistan A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University. August 2011 Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies (The Middle East and Central Asia) College of Arts and Social Sciences The Australian National University Christian Mark Bleuer 2 Declaration Except where otherwise acknowledged in the text, this thesis is based upon my own original research. The work contained in this thesis has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other university or institute. _________________________ 12 August 2011 3 Acknowledgements First of all I would like to thank my dissertation committee: Professor Amin Saikal, Dr. Kirill Nourzhanov and Dr. Robert L. Canfield. I am extremely grateful to have had the benefit of this high level of expertise on Central Asia while a PhD candidate at The Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies (The Middle East and Central Asia). Professor Saikal provided the firm guidance that kept me on track and reasonably on time with my work. His knowledge of Central Asian culture, history and politics was invaluable. Dr. Nourzhanov’s deep understanding of Tajikistan and Central Asia is what allowed me to produce this dissertation. He never failed to guide me towards the best sources, and the feedback he provided on my numerous drafts enabled me to vastly improve on the work that I had produced. I am also very grateful to Dr. Canfield who, despite being far away at Washington University in St. Louis, graciously agreed to be on my dissertation committee. His comments and criticism were valuable in refining my dissertation into the state that it is now in.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics and the Reshaping of Global Governance (PP85) by Anita
    Logistical Spaces VI Interwoven Realities: Logistics and the Reshaping of Global Governance Anita Sengupta 2017 Interwoven Realities: Logistics and the Reshaping of Global Governance ∗ Anita Sengupta Logistics is an emerging form of governance, global in scope and digitally controlled that operates on a transnational scale following its own organizational principles in ways that reorganize time and space. 1 In an article on Australia’s alternatives in a global era that is increasingly moving towards regional powers and organizations to resolve collective problems, Britain’s decision to join the China led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank is highlighted as an example of how geopolitics and geo- economics is not only intimately linked but how increasingly the latter will ‘trump’ the former. The article goes on to note certain dramatic developments in global affairs, not the least of which is the ‘tangible expression of China’s material centrality in Asia and beyond’, and highlights the recognition of this centrality in Britain’s decision to join the organization, exclusion from which would influence its ability to be a player in a ‘wider geopolitical and geo-economic game’. 2 Britain’s decision, which was followed by a rush of other European states into the institution, was one of the biggest geopolitical stories of 2015 and was portrayed as a repositioning of the global community of states between the new economic superpower and the old one. 3 Given Britain’s increasingly ‘isolationist’ stance in Europe this recognition of the significance of an organization essentially projected as a financial institution that aims to support the building of infrastructure in the Asia Pacific region is interesting for various reasons.
    [Show full text]