DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 November General Endorsement Consent Calendar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 November General Endorsement Consent Calendar 2020 November General Endorsement Consent Calendar State Assembly AD 41 Chris Holden* State Senate CD 19 Zoe Lofgren* AD 1 Elizabeth Betancourt AD 42 No Endorsement SD 1 Pamela Swartz CD 20 Jimmy Panetta* AD 2 Jim Wood* AD 43 Laura Friedman* SD 3 Bill Dodd* CD 21 TJ Cox* AD 3 James Henson AD 44 Jacqui Irwin* SD 5 Susan Talamantes Eggman CD 22 Phil Arballo AD 4 Cecilia Aguiar-Curry* AD 45 Jesse Gabriel* SD 7 Steve Glazer* CD 23 Kim Mangone AD 5 No Candidate Filed AD 46 Adrin Nazarian* SD 9 Nancy Skinner* CD 24 Salud Carbajal* AD 6 Jackie Smith AD 47 Eloise Reyes* SD 11 Scott Wiener* CD 25 Christy Smith AD 7 Kevin McCarty* AD 48 Blanca Rubio* SD 13 Josh Becker CD 26 Julia Brownley* AD 8 Ken Cooley* AD 49 Ed Chau* SD 15 David Cortese CD 27 Judy Chu* AD 9 James Cooper* AD 50 Richard Bloom* SD 17 John Laird CD 28 Adam Schiff* AD 10 Marc Levine* AD 51 Wendy Carrillo* SD 19 Monique Limón CD 29 Tony Cardenas* AD 11 Jim Frazier* AD 52 Freddie Rodriguez* SD 21 Kipp Mueller CD 30 Brad Sherman* AD 12 Paul Akinjo AD 53 Miguel Santiago* SD 23 Abigail Medina CD 31 Pete Aguilar* AD 13 Kathy Miller AD 54 Sydney Kamlager-Dove* SD 25 Anthony Portantino* CD 32 Grace F. Napolitano* AD 14 Timothy S. Grayson* AD 55 Andrew Rodriguez SD 27 Henry Stern* CD 33 Ted Lieu* AD 15 Buffy Wicks* AD 56 Eduardo Garcia* SD 29 Josh Newman CD 34 Jimmy Gomez* AD 16 Rebecca Bauer-Kahan* AD 57 Lisa Calderon SD 31 Richard Roth* CD 35 Norma Torres* AD 17 David Chiu* AD 58 Cristina Garcia* SD 33 Lena Gonzalez* CD 36 Raul Ruiz* AD 18 Rob Bonta* AD 59 Reggie Jones-Sawyer* SD 35 Steven Bradford* CD 37 Karen Bass* AD 19 Phil Ting* AD 60 Sabrina Cervantes* SD 37 Dave Min CD 38 Linda Sanchez* AD 20 Bill Quirk* AD 61 Jose Medina* SD 39 Toni Atkins* CD 39 Gil Cisneros* AD 21 Adam Gray* AD 62 Autumn Burke* CD 40 Lucille Roybal-Allard* AD 22 Kevin Mullin* AD 63 Anthony Rendon* U.S. House CD 41 Mark Takano* AD 23 No Endorsement AD 64 Mike Gipson* CD 1 Audrey Denney CD 42 Liam O’Mara AD 24 Marc Berman* AD 65 Sharon Quirk-Silva* CD 2 Jared Huffman* CD 43 Maxine Waters* AD 25 Alex Lee AD 66 Al Muratsuchi* CD 3 John Garamendi* CD 44 Nanette Barragan* AD 26 Drew Phelps AD 67 Jerry Carlos CD 4 Brynne Kennedy CD 45 Katie Porter* AD 27 Ash Kalra* AD 68 Melissa Fox CD 5 Mike Thompson* CD 46 Lou J. Correa* AD 28 Evan Low* AD 69 Tom Daly* CD 6 Doris Matsui* CD 47 Alan Lowenthal* AD 29 Mark Stone* AD 70 Patrick O'Donnell* CD 7 Ami Bera* CD 48 Harley Rouda* AD 30 Robert Rivas* AD 71 Elizabeth Lavertu CD 8 Christine Bubser CD 49 Mike Levin* AD 31 Joaquin Arambula* AD 72 Diedre “Thu-Ha” Nguyen CD 9 Jerry McNerney* CD 50 Ammar Campa-Najjar AD 32 Rudy Salas* AD 73 Scott Rhinehart CD 10 Josh Harder* CD 51 Juan Vargas* AD 33 No Consensus AD 74 Cottie Petrie-Norris* CD 11 Mark DeSaulnier* CD 52 Scott Peters* AD 34 Julie Solis AD 75 Karen Schwartz-Frates CD 12 Nancy Pelosi* CD 53 Georgette Gómez AD 35 Dawn Addis AD 76 Tasha Boerner Horvath* CD 13 Barbara Lee* AD 36 No Endorsement AD 77 Brian Maienschein* CD 14 Jackie Speier* AD 37 Steve Bennett AD 78 Chris Ward CD 15 Eric Swalwell* AD 38 No Endorsement AD 79 Shirley Weber* CD 16 Jim Costa* AD 39 Luz Rivas* AD 80 Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher* CD 17 Ro Khanna* AD 40 James Ramos* CD 18 Anna Eshoo* * Incumbent www.cadem.org/endorsements .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women in Criminal Trials in the Julio-Claudian Era
    Women in Criminal Trials in the Julio-Claudian Era by Tracy Lynn Deline B.A., University of Saskatchewan, 1994 M.A., University of Saskatchewan, 2001 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Classics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2009 © Tracy Lynn Deline, 2009 Abstract This study focuses on the intersection of three general areas: elite Roman women, criminal law, and Julio-Claudian politics. Chapter one provides background material on the literary and legal source material used in this study and considers the cases of Augustus’ daughter and granddaughter as a backdrop to the legal and political thinking that follows. The remainder of the dissertation is divided according to women’s roles in criminal trials. Chapter two, encompassing the largest body of evidence, addresses the role of women as defendants, and this chapter is split into three thematic parts that concentrate on charges of adultery, treason, and other crimes. A recurring question is whether the defendants were indicted for reasons specific to them or the indictments were meant to injure their male family members politically. Analysis of these cases reveals that most of the accused women suffered harm without the damage being shared by their male family members. Chapter three considers that a handful of powerful women also filled the role of prosecutor, a role technically denied to them under the law. Resourceful and powerful imperial women like Messalina and Agrippina found ways to use criminal accusations to remove political enemies. Chapter four investigates women in the role of witnesses in criminal trials.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of Texas
    ■■IT Misc. Docket No. AND*-':. ■rx In The Supreme Court of Texas IN RE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATE APPEALS OF RELA TED AD VALOREM TAX SUITS MOTION TO TRANSFER APPEALS PENDING BEFORE THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS AND THE THDXTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS P. Jefferson Ballew Shannon H. Ratliff State Bar No. 16573000 State Bar No. 01654980 Adrienne E. Dominguez Lisa A. Paulson State Bar No.00784732 State Bar No. 00793630 Thompson & Knight LLP Ratliff Law Firm, PLLC 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 3100 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3300 Austin, Texas 78701 Dallas, Texas 75201 (512)493-9600 (214) 969-1700 FAX: (512) 493-9625 FAX: (214) 969-1751 ATTORNEYS FOR CHEVRON U.S.A., ATTORNEYS FOR MOBIL INC. a/k/a CHEVRON PRODUCTS PRODUCING TEXAS & NEW COMPANY, TEXACO INC., TEXACO MEXICO, INC. and SOCONY MOBIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC. INC. and FOUR STAR OIL & GAS COMPANY Misc. Docket No. In The Supreme Court of Texas IN RE MOTION TO TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDA TE APPEALS OF RELA TED AD VALOREM TAX SUITS MOTION TO TRANSFER APPEALS PENDING BEFORE THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS AND THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS P. Jefferson Ballew Shannon H. Ratliff State Bar No. 01654980 State Bar No. 16573000 Adrienne E. Dominguez Lisa A. Paulson State Bar No. 00793630 State Bar No.00784732 Thompson & Knight LLP Ratliff Law Firm, PLLC 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 3300 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 3100 Dallas, Texas 75201 Austin, Texas 78701 (214) 969-1700 (512)493-9600 FAX: (214) 969-1751 FAX: (512) 493-9625 ATTORNEYS FOR CHEVRON U.S.A., ATTORNEYS FOR MOBIL INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar to Caligula)
    Notable instances of intellectual repression in Rome (Julius Caesar to Caligula) NB: Legal bases: • Twelve Tables (450 BC) (TT 8.1, cited by Cicero in Rep. 4.12, p. 79 in your text, who wholeheartedly agrees with the law) prohibited defamatory writings: ‘If any person had sung or composed against another person a song (=poem) such as was causing slander or insult to another…’ Penalty (in 450 BC, evidently) was to be clubbed to death. • maiestas (treason): first introduced 103 BC, underwent a variety of changes, though the important one was the law passed by Julius Caesar (lex Iulia maiestatis, ca. 45 BC) which made banishment the chief penalty. This was the law invoked frequently in the first century of the Principate (notably by Tiberius, but by almost all of his successors as well). Julius Caesar ca. 45 BC: expert on oracles exiled by Julius Caesar Augustus 31 BC(?): Octavian (=Augustus) burns all documents relevant to triumviral period 28 BC: philosopher (Anaxilaos), expert in magic, banished ca. 27 BC: Augustus curtails publication of the acta senatus (‘senatorial record’) ca. 18 BC(?): Augustus forbids publication of anonymous attacks 12 BC: Augustus, now pontifex maximus, burns all oracular books and writings. First known instance of ‘book burning’ (usually done under charge of maiestas) AD 6 (?): Corvus, professor of rhetoric, charged with ‘harming the state’ for discussing birth control and celibacy in his classroom. Outcome of trial unknown. ca. AD 6-8: Titus Labienus, Augustan orator and an historian, has his writings confiscated and burned by senatorial decree (on grounds that his writings were treasonous).
    [Show full text]
  • 1985 Chapter 4
    23 85-86 Wis.. Stats ., LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS 4.001 CHAPTER 4 SENATE AND ASSEMBLY DISTRICTS SUBCHAPTERI 4 .45 Forty-fifth assembly district, GENERAL PROVISIONS 446 Forty-sixth assembly district 4 Legislative redistricting ; equal population . 447 Forty-seventh assembly district . 4 .002 Municipal wards . 4.48. Forty-eighth assembly district . 4 .003 Description of boundaries. 4 .49 Forty-ninth assembly district . 4004 Elections to the legislature. 4 .50 Fiftieth assembly district. 4005 Territory omitted from legislative redistricting, 4, 51 Fifty-first assembly district SUBCHAPTER 11 452 Fifty-second assembly district SENATE DISTRICTS 453 Fifty-third assembly district.. 4 .009 Senate districts, 4 . 54 Fifty-foureh assembly district.. SUBCHAPTER III 4 .55 Fifty-fifth assembly district, ASSEMBLY DISTRICTS 4 .56 Fifty-sixth assembly district . 401 First assembly district . 4.57 Fifty-seventh assembly district . 402 Second assembly district. 4,58 Fifty-eighth assembly district . 403 Third assembly district. 4 .59 Fifty-ninth assembly district. 404 Fourth assembly district . 4 .60 Sixtieth assembly district . 405 Fifth assembly district.. 4 ,61 Sixty-first assembly district . 406 Sixth assembly district . 4 .62 Sixty-second assembly district . 407 Seventh assembly district . Eighth assembly district . 4,63 Sixty-third assembly district . 408 4 .64 Sixty-fourth assembly district 409 Ninth assembly district . 465 Sixty-fifth assembly district. 4.100 Tenth assembly district 4 . 66 . Sixty-sixth assembly district 4.11 Eleventh assembly district . Twelfth assembly distr ict. 467 Sixty-seventh assembly district . 412 4 . 413 'Thirteenth assembly district. 68 Sixty-eighth assembly district . 4 .14 Fourteenth assembly district. 469 Sixty-ninth assembly district . 4 . 15.- Fifteenth assembly district .
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Case: 17-17531, 04/02/2018, ID: 10821327, DktEntry: 13-1, Page 1 of 111 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WINDING CREEK SOLAR LLC, Case No. 17-17531 Plaintiff-Appellant, On Appeal from the United States v. District Court for the Northern District of California CARLA PETERMAN; MARTHA No. 3:13-cv-04934-JD GUZMAN ACEVES; LIANE Hon. James Donato RANDOLPH; CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN; MICHAEL PICKER, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission, Defendants-Appellees. Case No. 17-17532 WINDING CREEK SOLAR LLC, On Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Northern District v. of California No. 3:13-cv-04934-JD CARLA PETERMAN; MARTHA Hon. James Donato GUZMAN ACEVES; LIANE RANDOLPH; CLIFFORD RECHTSCHAFFEN; MICHAEL PICKER, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the California Public Utilities Commission, Defendants-Appellants. APPELLANT’S FIRST BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL Thomas Melone ALLCO RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD. 1740 Broadway, 15th Floor New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (212) 681-1120 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Appellant WINDING CREEK SOLAR LLC Case: 17-17531, 04/02/2018, ID: 10821327, DktEntry: 13-1, Page 2 of 111 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Winding Creek Solar LLC is 100% owned by Allco Finance Limited, which is a privately held company in the business of developing solar energy projects. Allco Finance Limited has no parent companies, and no publicly held company owns 10 percent or more of its stock. /s/ Thomas Melone i Case: 17-17531, 04/02/2018, ID: 10821327, DktEntry: 13-1, Page 3 of 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Motions California State Retirees (Csr) Board of Directors Meeting
    SUMMARY OF MOTIONS CALIFORNIA STATE RETIREES (CSR) BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Holiday Inn, Sacramento February 22, 2018 7. Approval of October 26, 2017 Board Meeting Minutes CSR 1/18/1 MOTION: Oliveira, second by Hueg - that the CSR Board of Directors approve the minutes of the October 26, 2017 meeting as printed. CARRIED. 11. Program Reports - HQ CSR 2/18/1 MOTION: Fountain, second by Hueg – that the CSR Board of Directors buy the three promotion items, hats, totes and lapel pins, in bulk and send out numbers to chapters. CARRIED. 12. Political Action Committee CSR 3/18/1 MOTION: Oliveira, second by Fountain – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse incumbents Controller Betty Yee and Secretary of State Alex Padilla for reelection. CARRIED. CSR 4/18/1 MOTION: Umemoto, second by Jimenez – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse Treasurer Fiona Ma. CARRIED. CSR 5/18/1 MOTION: Jimenez, second by Oliveira – that the CSR Board of Directors endorse the following Assembly incumbents seeking reelection: AD 01 Brian Dahle (R-Bieber), AD 02 Jim Wood (D-Healdsburg), AD 03 James Gallagher (R-Nicolaus), AD 04 Cecilia Aguiar-Curry (D-Napa), AD 05 Frank Bigelow (R-O’Neals), AD 06 Kevin Kiley (R-El Dorado Hills), AD 07 Kevin McCarty (D-Sacramento), AD 08 Ken Cooley (D-Rancho Cordova), AD 09 Jim Cooper (D-Elk Grove), AD 10 Marc Levine (D-San Rafael), AD 11 Jim Frazier (D-Oakley), AD 12 Heath Flora (R-Modesto), AD 13 Susan Eggman (D-Stockton), AD 14 Tim Grayson (D-Concord), AD 16 Catharine Baker (D-Dublin), AD 17 David Chiu (D-San Francisco), AD 18 Rob Bonta (D-Alameda), AD 19 Phil Ting (D-San Francisco), AD 20 Bill Quirk (D- Hayward), AD 21 Adam Gray (D-Merced).
    [Show full text]
  • The Persecution of Christians in the First Century
    JETS 61.3 (2018): 525–47 THE PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS IN THE FIRST CENTURY ECKHARD J. SCHNABEL* Abstract: The Book of Acts, Paul’s letters, 1 Peter, Hebrews, and Revelation attest to nu- merous incidents of persecution, which are attested for most provinces of the Roman empire, triggered by a wide variety of causes and connected with a wide variety of charges against the fol- lowers of Jesus. This essay surveys the twenty-seven specific incidents of and general references to persecution of Christians in the NT, with a focus on geographical, chronological, and legal matters. Key words: persecution, mission, hostility, opposition, Jerusalem, Rome, Peter, Paul, Acts, Hebrews, Revelation This essay seeks to survey the evidence in the NT for instances of the perse- cution of Jesus’ earliest followers in their historical and chronological contexts without attempting to provide a comprehensive analysis of each incident. The Greek term diōgmos that several NT authors use, usually translated as “persecu- tion,”1 is defined as “a program or process designed to harass and oppress some- one.”2 The term “persecution” is used here to describe the aggressive harassment and deliberate ill-treatment of the followers of Jesus, ranging from verbal abuse, denunciation before local magistrates, initiating court proceedings to beatings, flog- ging, banishment from a city, execution, and lynch killings. I. PERSECUTION IN JUDEA, SYRIA, AND NABATEA (AD 30–38/40) 1. Persecution in Jerusalem, Judea (I). Priests in Jerusalem, the captain of the tem- ple, and Sadducees arrested the apostles Peter and John who spoke to a crowd of * Eckhard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts for Mark Twain's Memory Builder
    Facts for Mark Twain's Memory Builder Date Date Length of Length of Beginning Ending Rule in Rule in Empire Role Name Rule Rule Years Months Notes Display Phrase Rome King Romulus 753 BC 716 BC 37 years 444 months Romulus (legendary), king of Rome Rome Interreg. Interregnum 716 BC 715 BC 1 year 12 months Interregnum in Rome after Romulus Rome King Numa Pompilius 715 BC 673 BC 42 years 504 months Numa Pompilius, king of Rome Rome King Tullus Hostilius 673 BC 641 BC 32 years 384 months Tullus Hostilius, king of Rome Rome King Ancus Marcius 640 BC 616 BC 24 years 288 months Ancus Marcius, king of Rome Rome King Tarquinius Priscus 616 BC 578 BC 38 years 456 months Tarquinius Priscus, king of Rome Rome King Servius Tullius 578 BC 534 BC 44 years 528 months Servius Tullius, king of Rome Rome King Tarquinius Superbus 534 BC 510 BC 24 years 288 months Tarquinius Superbus, king of Rome Rome Republic Republic 510 BC 45 BC 465 years 5580 months Republic founded in Rome Rome Emperor Julius Caesar 45 BC 44 BC 0 years 6 months Julius Caesar to power in Rome Rome Republic Second Triumvirate 43 BC 31 BC 45 years 144 months Second Triumverate to power in Rome Rome Emperor Augustus 31 BC 14 AD 45 years 540 months Augustus to power in Rome Rome Emperor Tiberius 14 AD 37 AD 23 years 276 months Tiberius, Roman emperor Rome Emperor Caligula 37 AD 41 AD 4 years 48 months Caligula, Roman emperor Rome Emperor Claudius 41 AD 54 AD 13 years 156 months Claudius, Roman emperor Rome Emperor Nero 54 AD 68 AD 14 years 168 months Nero, Roman emperor Rome Emperor Galba
    [Show full text]
  • ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons CUREJ - College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal College of Arts and Sciences 5-2011 ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72 Emerson T. Brooking University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Military History Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Brooking, Emerson T., "ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72" 01 May 2011. CUREJ: College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal, University of Pennsylvania, https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/145. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/145 For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72 Abstract This study evaluates the military history and practice of the Roman Empire in the context of contemporary counterinsurgency theory. It purports that the majority of Rome’s security challenges fulfill the criteria of insurgency, and that Rome’s responses demonstrate counterinsurgency proficiency. These assertions are proven by means of an extensive investigation of the grand strategic, military, and cultural aspects of the Roman state. Fourteen instances of likely insurgency are identified and examined, permitting the application of broad theoretical precepts
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 202/Tuesday, October
    63600 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Notices Comments may be submitted by any of SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE total of 12,000 external hours annually the following methods: COMMISSION (120 hours × 100 reports). The burden was estimated using Commission review Electronic Comments [SEC File No. 270–263; OMB Control No. 3235–0275] of filed Rule 17Ad–13 reports. The • Use the Commission’s Internet Commission estimates that, on average, comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Submission for OMB Review; 120 hours are needed to perform the rules/sro.shtml); or Comment Request study, prepare the report, and retain the required records on an annual basis. • Send an email to rule-comments@ Upon Written Request, Copies Available Assuming an average hourly rate of an sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– From: Securities and Exchange independent accountant of $60, the CBOE–2015–085 on the subject line. Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC average total annual cost of the report is Paper Comments 20549–2736. $7,200. The total annual cost for the • approximate 100 respondents is Send paper comments in triplicate Extension: approximately $720,000. to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Rule 17Ad–13. The retention period for the Commission, 100 F Street NE., Notice is hereby given that pursuant Washington, DC 20549–1090. to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 recordkeeping requirement under Rule 17Ad–13 is three years following the All submissions should refer to File (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the Securities and Exchange Commission date of a report prepared pursuant to the Number SR–CBOE–2015–085.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly District 1 Advocacy # of Children 0-17: 20,082 Health
    Children's Fact Sheet Children's Assembly District 1 Advocacy # of Children 0-17: 20,082 Health 1 Children in Nevada Check-up: 659 2 Children Up-to-Date (Immunizations): 57.8% 3 Low-Birthweight Babies: 84.4 per 1,000 Mothers with Less Than Adequate 4 Prenatal Care: 148.4 per 1,000 5 Infant Mortality Rate: 4.4 per 1,000 6 Teen Birth Rate: 16.4 per 1,000 Safety0 7 CPS Abuse/Neglect Reports 281 Substantiated 14.2% 8 Children in Foster Care, CY 2017 93 HS Students Who Brought a Weapon 9 on School Property* 4.6% HS Students Who Didn't Feel Safe at 10 School* 7.9% * Indicates County Level Data 1-8 NV Dept. of HHS. (2019). Office of Analytics-Assembly District Reports. Retrieved from http://dhhs.nv.gov/Programs/Office_of_Analytics/OFFICE_OF_ANALYTICS_-_ASSEMBLY_DISTRICT_RE 9-10 NV Dept. of HHS. (2018). 2017 Nevada High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) Report. Retrieved from https://www.unr.edu/Documents/public- health/2017_yrbs/2017%20Nevada%20High%20School%20YRBS.pdf Children's Fact Sheet Children's Advocacy Assembly District 1 A I AN E # of Children 0-17: 20,082 Education 1 2 or more Races 8.1% English Language Learners (ELL) PI Asian 2% 11% 2 5.1% White 29.3% Reading Proficiency (Elementary/Middle) 55% / 45% 3 Math Proficiency (Elementary/Middle) Black 18.2% 48% / 37% 4 Students Who Qualify for FRL 59% 5 Science Proficiency (Elementary/Middle) 24% / 33% 7 Student Hispanic Race/Ethnicity 37.4% 6 School Star Ratings: 1 4 3 3 0 * Economic** Well***-Being **** ***** 7 Children 0-17 Living in Poverty 11.1% 8 SNAP Enrollment 10,041 9 TANF Enrollment 659 10 Children with All Available Parents in the Workforce 71% Teens 16-19 Not in School/Not Working11 3.7% 1-6 Opportunity 180: Great Schools, All Kids.
    [Show full text]
  • Drusus Libo and the Succession of Tiberius
    THE REPUBLIC IN DANGER This page intentionally left blank The Republic in Danger Drusus Libo and the Succession of Tiberius ANDREW PETTINGER 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries # Andrew Pettinger 2012 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2012 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available ISBN 978–0–19–960174–5 Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by MPG Books Group, Bodmin and King’s Lynn To Hayley, Sue, and Graham Preface In 2003, while reading modern works on treason trials in Rome, I came across the prosecution of M. Scribonius Drusus Libo, an aristocrat destroyed in AD 16 for seeking out the opinions of a necromancer.
    [Show full text]