DOCSLIB.ORG

Transformations in the Carpathian Basin Around 1600 B. C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transformations in the Carpathian Basin Around 1600 B. C View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library Transformations in the carpathian Basin around 1600 B. C. Klára P. fischl, Viktória Kiss, gabriella Kulcsár and Vajk szeverényi Zusammenfassung Summary Um die Zeit des Vulkanausbruchs von Thera fanden wichtige Around the time of the Thera eruption important transforma- Veränderungen im Karpatenbecken statt. Diese sogenannte tions occurred in the Carpathian Basin. This is the so-called Koszider Epoche korrespondiert mit der letzten Phase der Koszider Period, which corresponds to the last phase of the mittleren Bronzezeit in der ungarischen Terminologie und Middle Bronze Age (MBA) in the Hungarian terminology and stellt den Übergang zur späten Bronzezeit dar. Die Untersu- represents a transition to the Late Bronze Age. The assess- chung dieser Epoche hat sich bisher als kontrovers erwiesen ment of the period has been controversial among both Hun- – sowohl unter ungarischen als auch mitteleuropäischen Wis- garian and central European scholars. In the past few years senschaftlern. Erst in den letzten Jahren ist diese Epoche nicht this period has been interpreted not as a short »horizon« con- mehr als kurzer Zeitraum, mit der ein bestimmtes histori- nected to a specific historical event, but as a longer period sches Ereignis verbunden werden kann, interpretiert worden. that represented the heyday of the MBA in the Carpathian Vielmehr sieht man sie nun als eine länger dauernde Periode Basin, which ended with significant transformations. The an, welche die Blütezeit der mittleren Bronzezeit im Karpa- main elements of this transformation, however, are still un- tenbecken markiert und die mit einschneidenden Verände- clear. Our aim is to investigate this transformation through rungen endet. the comparison of several aspects of three subsequent phases Die Hauptelemente dieses Wandels sind allerdings noch and to amend the previously offered interpretations of the unklar. Unser Ziel ist es, den Wandel durch den Vergleich ver- changes with a few new considerations. schiedener Aspekte dreier aufeinanderfolgender Phasen zu untersuchen. Am Ende sollen einige neue Erwägungen ste- hen, die die bisherigen Interpretationen dieser Veränderun- gen erweitern können. Introduction In the past few years this period has been interpreted not as a short »horizon« connected to a specific historical event, Around the time of the Thera eruption important transfor- but as a longer period that represented the heyday of the mations occurred in the Carpathian Basin, today covering MBA in the Carpathian Basin, which ended with significant Hungary and parts of Austria, Slovakia, the Ukraine, Roma- transformations (Bóna 1992; Bóna 1992a). The main ele- nia, Serbia and Croatia (Fig. 1). This is the so-called Koszider ments of this transformation, however, are still unclear. Our Period, which corresponds to the last phase of the Middle aim below is to investigate this transformation through the Bronze Age (MBA) according to the Hungarian terminology, comparison of several aspects of three subsequent phases and represents a transition to the Late Bronze Age (LBA). – the classic phase of the MBA (Reinecke Bronzezeit [here- The assessment of the period has been controversial among after: RB] A2b–c; ca. 18oo–16oo B. C.), its final phase, the both Hungarian and central European scholars. Koszider Period (RB B; ca. 16oo–15oo/145o B. C.) and the The eponymous bronze hoards that had been found in beginning of the LBA, the classic Tumulus Grave Period the uppermost layers of the tell settlement of Dunaújváros- (RB C1–C2; ca. 15oo/145o–13oo B. C.) – and to amend the Kosziderpadlás were published by A. Mozsolics and I. Bóna previously offered interpretations of the changes with a few in the 195os together with other hoards of similar composi- new considerations. tion. The burial of the hoards – based on the traditional con- cept of culture and then dated to 135o B. C. – was connected to the attack of the mobile pastoralist warriors of the The Early and Middle Bronze Age background »Tumulus Culture« from southern Germany, whose appear- ance brought an end to the flourishing »Tell Cultures« of the At the beginning of the Early Bronze Age (EBA) in Hungary Danube and Tisza regions1. Accordingly, the Koszider (28oo/27oo–26oo/25oo B. C.) ceramic styles delineate com- Period was considered a short, war-ridden and turbulent munication networks covering large areas within the whole phase. Carpathian Basin with two main groups characterized by 1 Mozsolics 1957; Bóna 1958; Mozsolics 1967. Tagungen des Landesmuseums für VorgeschichTe halle • Band 9 • 2013 356 KLára P. fischL, Viktória Kiss, gaBriella KuLcsár, VajK szeVerényi Northeastern Carpathians Northwestern Carpathians Eastern Carpathians Apuseni Mountains Southern Carpathians 100 km Fig. 1 The Carpathian Basin with modern state borders and major rivers and mountains. the Makó-Kosihy-Čaka and Late Vučedol/Somogyvár- One of the major features of the period is the formation of Vinkovci ceramic styles2. With a few exceptions, the settle- tell settlements that were inhabited for many centuries ment pattern of this phase indicates little social stratifi- along the Danube and Tisza rivers and their tributaries5. cation, with not much differentiation between the larger These settlements imply increased sedentism and intensive centres and the smaller or larger open settlements. agriculture on the one hand, and a new attitude towards ter- In the second half of the EBA (25oo/24oo–2ooo/19oo ritoriality, the emergence of a new relationship with the B. C.), we can observe a transformation that probably grew past, traditions and ancestors, and of new rituals – primarily out of the contact of a southern, Balkan and a northwestern that of deliberate house burning6 – on the other. and central European (Bell Beaker) network within the Car- It is important to note, however, that within the distri- pathian Basin; the exact process, however, still remains un- bution area of the so-called »Tell Cultures« tell settlements known. In place of – and partly beside – the previous two themselves are not present everywhere. According to large stylistic units, new ones covering smaller areas appear P. Sümegi’s results, on the macro level, tells emerged in areas along the Danube and to the east, and develop continuously with a sub-Mediterranean climate and an alluvial environ- into the MBA (RB A2; from 2ooo/19oo B. C.) (Fig. 2)3. West ment with mosaic patterning (Sümegi/Bodor 2ooo). For of this region we encounter the Transdanubian Encrusted example, in the case of the sites characterized by Hatvan Ware in the MBA (Kiss 2oo3; Kiss 2o12). Even more to the style material it is striking that tells characteristically do not west communities belonged to the wider Aunjetitz circle occur north of the Pannonian forest steppe vegetation zone (Gáta/Wieselburg, Unterwölbling) and the southeast Alpine (Fig. 3). This indicates that tell settlements are important, regional groups4. All this indicates the emergence of smaller but not exclusive features of the cultural and social units of groups that communicated their identities with new, increas- the period. The often fortified tells along the Danube and to ingly distinct ceramic styles. the east, and the fortified hilltop settlements in the central 2 Bóna 1992; Kulcsár 2oo9; Reményi 2oo9. 4 Bóna 1975; Neugebauer 1994; Krenn-Leeb 6 Stevanović 1997; Chapman 1999; Szeverényi 3 Hatvan, Maros, Vatin/Vattina, Vatya, 2oo6. 2oo4. Füzesabony, Gyulavarsánd styles: Bóna 5 Sherratt 1993; Gogâltan 2oo2; O’Shea 2o11. 1975; Bóna 1992. Tagungen des Landesmuseums für VorgeschichTe halle • Band 9 • 2013 TransformaTions in The carPaThian Basin around 1600 B. C. 357 100 km Fig. 2 Distribution of Middle Bronze Age (MBA) ceramic styles in the Carpathian Basin. part of Transdanubia – where tells are missing – are usually label Koszider metallurgy (Fig. 5). In Austria and Germany, interpreted as chiefly centres, surrounded by larger single the emergence of this new type of jewellery was connected layer settlements and smaller satellite settlements. It to the appearance of elements from the Carpathian Basin. In remains debated whether this three-level settlement hier- Hungary, however, the new metal types were connected to archy, probably integrating a few thousand individuals, can the appearance of a new ceramic style that was thought to be taken to indicate the presence of chiefdom type polities in arrive from the western part of central Europe through the the area7. migration of the »Tumulus Grave Culture«8. The best expla- nation for this paradigm change that can be observed in a number of regions may be the emergence of a new commu- Typochronology and absolute dates nication network throughout most of central Europe, whose point of origin is still unknown, perhaps can never be One of the most salient phenomena in the youngest layers of known, or should be considered »multi-centred«. tell settlements is that the borders between previously more Within the framework of the radiocarbon-based high distinct pottery styles become blurred, and generally pot- chronology, the MBA in Hungary is placed between ca. 2ooo tery becomes more uniform. There are a number of possible B. C. and 15oo B. C. Within this period the date of the end explanations for this: perhaps the different local identities phase of the MBA, the Koszider Period (RB A2c–RB B) communicated through distinct ceramic styles became more remains somewhat uncertain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Connected Histories: the Dynamics of Bronze Age Interaction and Trade 1500–1100 BC
    Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 81, 2015, pp. 361–392 © The Prehistoric Society doi:10.1017/ppr.2015.17 Connected Histories: the Dynamics of Bronze Age Interaction and Trade 1500–1100 BC By KRISTIAN KRISTIANSEN1 and PAULINA SUCHOWSKA-DUCKE2 The Bronze Age was the first epoch in which societies became irreversibly linked in their co-dependence on ores and metallurgical skills that were unevenly distributed in geographical space. Access to these critical resources was secured not only via long-distance physical trade routes, making use of landscape features such as river networks, as well as built roads, but also by creating immaterial social networks, consisting of interpersonal relations and diplomatic alliances, established and maintained through the exchange of extraordinary objects (gifts). In this article, we reason about Bronze Age communication networks and apply the results of use-wear analysis to create robust indicators of the rise and fall of political and commercial networks. In conclusion, we discuss some of the historical forces behind the phenomena and processes observable in the archaeological record of the Bronze Age in Europe and beyond. Keywords: Bronze Age communication networks, agents, temperate Europe, Mediterranean Basin THE EUROPEAN BRONZE AGE AS A COMMUNICATION by small variations in ornaments and weapons NETWORK: HISTORICAL & THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK (Kristiansen 2014). Among the characteristics that might compel archaeo- Initially driven by the necessity to gain access to logists to label the Bronze Age a ‘formative epoch’ in remote resources and technological skills, Bronze Age European history, the density and extent of the era’s societies established communication links that ranged exchange and communication networks should per- from the Baltic to the Mediterranean and from haps be regarded as the most significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture, Style and Structure in the Early Iron Age in Central Europe
    TOMASZ GRALAK ARCHITECTURE, STYLE AND STRUCTURE IN THE EARLY IRON AGE IN CENTRAL EUROPE Wrocław 2017 Reviewers: prof. dr hab. Danuta Minta-Tworzowska prof. dr hab. Andrzej P. Kowalski Technical preparation and computer layout: Natalia Sawicka Cover design: Tomasz Gralak, Nicole Lenkow Translated by Tomasz Borkowski Proofreading Agnes Kerrigan ISBN 978-83-61416-61-6 DOI 10.23734/22.17.001 Uniwersytet Wrocławski Instytut Archeologii © Copyright by Uniwersytet Wrocławski and author Wrocław 2017 Print run: 150 copies Printing and binding: "I-BIS" Usługi Komputerowe, Wydawnictwo S.C. Andrzej Bieroński, Przemysław Bieroński 50-984 Wrocław, ul. Sztabowa 32 Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER I. THE HALLSTATT PERIOD 1. Construction and metrology in the Hallstatt period in Silesia .......................... 13 2. The koine of geometric ornaments ......................................................................... 49 3. Apollo’s journey to the land of the Hyperboreans ............................................... 61 4. The culture of the Hallstatt period or the great loom and scales ....................... 66 CHAPTER II. THE LA TÈNE PERIOD 1. Paradigms of the La Tène style ................................................................................ 71 2. Antigone and the Tyrannicides – the essence of ideological change ................. 101 3. The widespread nature of La Tène style ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral Landscapes Burial Mounds in the Copper and Bronze Ages
    travaux de la maison de l’orient et de la méditerranée n° 58 ANCESTRAL LANDSCAPES BURIAL MOUNDS IN THE COPPER AND BRONZE AGES (Central and Eastern Europe – Balkans – Adriatic – Aegean, 4th-2nd millennium B.C.) Edited by Elisabetta Borgna and Sylvie Müller Celka AncestrAl LandscApes BuriAl mounds in the copper And Bronze Ages (central and eastern europe – Balkans – Adriatic – Aegean, 4th-2nd millennium B.c.) maison de l’orient et de la méditerranée – jean pouilloux (université lumière-lyon 2 – cnrs) publications dirigées par Jean-Baptiste Yon Derniers titres parus dans la série tmo (travaux de la maison de l’orient) tmo 48 Failaka, Fouilles françaises 1984-1988, matériel céramique du temple-tour et épigraphie, sous la dir. d’Y. Calvet et m. pic, édition bilingue français-anglais, trad. par e. Willcox, 2008, 204 p. (isBn 978-2-903264-98-7) tmo 49 Archaeozoology of the Near East VIII (Actes des huitièmes Rencontres internationales d’Archéozoologie de l’Asie du Sud-ouest et des régions adjacentes, Lyon, 28 juin-1er juillet 2006 / Proceedings of the eighth international Symposium on the Archaeozoology of southwestern Asia end adjacent areas, Lyon, June 28th-July 1st 2006), ed. by e. Vila, l. gourichon, A.m. choyke and h. Buitenhuis, 2008, 648 p., 2 volumes. (isBn 978-2-35668-005-1) tmo 50 Actes de vente dans le monde grec. témoignages épigraphiques des ventes immobilières, J. game, 2008, 210 p. (isBn 978-2-35668-004-4) tmo 51 Amphores vinaires de Narbonnaise. Production et grand commerce. Création d’une base de données géochimiques des ateliers, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Amber in Western and Central Balkans Bronastodobni
    Arheološki vestnik 71, 2020, 133–172; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AV.71.03 133 Bronze Age amber in Western and Central Balkans Bronastodobni jantar na zahodnem in srednjem Balkanu Mateusz CWALIŃSKI Izvleček V članku se avtor ukvarja s problematiko dotoka jantarja na zahodni in srednji Balkan v času bronaste dobe (natanč- neje okoli 1600–900 pr. n. št.) ter njegovim kroženjem med regijami tega območja. Razpoložljivi podatki, povezani s to temo, so bili analizirani z uporabo različnih računskih metod. Predhodno tipološko opredeljene jantarne jagode kažejo kronološke razlike, kar omogoča delitev na dva glavna sklopa, ki ju je mogoče pripisati srednji in mlajši oz. pozni bro- nasti dobi. Nekatere oblike so v uporabi v obeh obdobjih. Za številne tipe je značilen omejen obseg razprostranjenosti, ki verjetno govori za lokalno proizvodnjo. Tipe jantarnih jagod avtor primerja tudi z jantarnimi izdelki s sosednjih ob- močij z jantarjem. Izbrani predmeti, ki se pojavljajo skupaj z jantarjem, dodatno osvetljujejo notranjo dinamiko kroženja jantarja in kažejo na potencialne udeležence izmenjave. Ključne besede: Balkan; bronasta doba; jantar; nakit; menjava; trgovina; analiza stikov; analiza mrež Abstract The paper touches upon the issue of amber inflow to Western and Central Balkans, and its circulation between in- dividual regions situated in this zone, during the Bronze Age (more specifically around 1600–900 BC). By using several computational methods, currently available data related to this topic is re-analysed. Previously distinguished types of amber beads show chronological differentiation that allows separating them into two major assemblages assignable to the Middle and Late Bronze Age respectively, with some forms having a prolonged use, overlapping both periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Between the Aegean and Baltic Seas Prehistory Across Borders
    1 AEGAEUM 27 Annales d'archeologie egeenne de l'Universite de Liege et UT-PASP BETWEEN THE AEGEAN AND BALTIC SEAS PREHISTORY ACROSS BORDERS Proceedings of the International Conference Bronze and Early Iron Age Interconnections and Contemporary Developments between the Aegean and the Regions of the Balkan Peninsula, Central and Northern Europe University of Zagreb, 11-14 April 2005 Edited by loanna GALANAKI, Helena TOMAS, Yannis GALANAKIS and Robert LAFFINEUR Universite de Liege Histoire de l'art et archeologie de la Grece antique University of Texas at Austin Program in Aegean Scripts and Prehistory AMBER BETWEEN THE BALTIC AND THE AEGEAN IN THE THIRD AND SECOND MILLENNIA BC (AN OUTLINE OF MAJOR ISSUES)* Interest in the archaeological amber industry goes back a long time and has produced a wealth of literature, as is demonstrated by extensive bibliographies.1 I refer those interested in specific issues to these. In this paper I shall focus on a brief presentation of several questions. Most attention is devoted to the question of the beginning of amber's world career, in particular its Central European origins. They call for a broader treatment, especially when one considers readers who focus on the Mediterranean. In addition, I shall discuss in general terms the synchronisation of chronologies between Central Europe and the Aegean, as well as the routes of north-south circulation of amber. Central European origins I shall begin with a commonplace: the archaeological artefacts that we study form only a minor fraction of the objects that were in circulation in prehistoric times. In the case of amber, however, there is an exceptional degree of underestimation.
    [Show full text]
  • Complexity and Autonomy in Bronze Age Europe: Assessing Cultural Developments in Eastern Hungary
    COMPLEXITY AND AUTONOMY IN BRONZE AGE EUROPE: ASSESSING CULTURAL DEVELOPMENTS IN EASTERN HUNGARY by Paul R. Duffy A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor John M. O’Shea, Chair Professor Daniel G. Brown Professor Robert E. Whallon Jr. Professor Henry T. Wright © Paul R. Duffy 2010 For my Mother and Father ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My interest in comparative anthropology was ignited during my undergraduate degree while taking classes with Bruce Trigger at McGill University. Although I found the comparison of states fascinating, my interest centered on the long developmental sequences that led to their formation. When I arrived in Ann Arbor in 2001, I wanted to compare the prehistoric trajectories of complex societies, and explain why they diverged. It was fortuitous that Joyce Marcus suggested I spend a summer in Hungary on Bill Parkinson’s NSF funded project in 2002. Meeting with Bill and Attila Gyucha, his Hungarian colleague, would set in motion close collaborative friendships that would allow the study of the eastern Hungarian Bronze Age contained within these pages. My debt to them and countless others is enormous. Many people facilitated my entry into Hungary. Pál Raczky generously provided input on my project when I was first becoming acquainted with the Hungarian Bronze Age. Magdi Vicze was very kind in introducing me to Százhalombatta archaeology and answering my questions about the Great Hungarian Plain. In and around Budapest, I have been warmly greeted by the next generation of Bronze Age specialists: Dani Fukőh, Brigitta Berzsényi, Vajk Szeverényi, Attila Kreiter, Gabi Kúlcsár, Viktória Kiss, Klara Fischl, László Reményi, János Dani and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collapse of the Únětice Culture: Economic Explanation Based on the “Dutch Disease” Serge Svizzero
    The collapse of the Únětice culture: economic explanation based on the “Dutch disease” Serge Svizzero To cite this version: Serge Svizzero. The collapse of the Únětice culture: economic explanation based on the “Dutch disease”. Czech Journal of Social Sciences, Business and Economics, 2015, 4 (3), pp.6-18. 10.24984/cjssbe.2015.4.3.1. hal-02150097 HAL Id: hal-02150097 https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-02150097 Submitted on 7 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THE COLLAPSE OF THE ÚNĚTICE CULTURE: ECONOMIC EXPLANATION BASED ON THE “DUTCH DISEASE” Serge Svizzero Université de la Réunion Abstract Most explanations of social collapse highlight the ecological strain or the role of economic stratification but they hardly try to establish a link between the origins of prosperity and the causes of collapse. Our purpose is to establish such link, i.e. to provide an explanation of collapse based on the origin of prosperity. For cultures of the Bronze Age, the prosperity came from metalworking, i.e. initially from a mining boom and then to the subsequent activities (bronze production) it allowed. In such context, the collapse can be the result of an economic crisis known in modern economic analysis as the “Dutch Disease”, a term that broadly refers to the harmful consequences of large increases in a country’s income.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Celtic Culture
    Early Celtic Culture The La Tene Celts of the classical period developed their culture from two earlier cultures: the Urnfield and the Hallstatt. Urnfield Culture • The Urnfield culture (1300 BC - 750 BC) was a late Bronze Age culture of central Europe. The name comes from the custom of cremating the dead and placing their ashes in urns (vases) which were then buried in the middle of the fields. • The early Celtic peoples of the Urnfield culture first lived in an area of Europe covering from Hungary to northern Italy. • Some graves contain a combination of tumulus-culture ceramics and Urnfield swords or Tumulus culture carved ceramics together with early Urnfield types. This demonstrates a considerable ritual continuity. • In the earliest phases of the Urnfield period, man-shaped graves were dug, sometimes provided with a stone lined floor, in which the cremated remains of the deceased were spread. Many scholars contemplate that this may have marked a crucial shift in people's beliefs or myths about life and the afterlife. Hallstatt Culture • The Hallstatt culture was the dominant central European culture from the 8th to 6th centuries BC, developing out of the Urnfield culture of the 12th century BC and followed in much of central Europe by the La Tene culture. • It is commonly associated with the Celtic populations in the Western Hallstatt zone with pre- Illyrians in the eastern Hallstatt zone. • Trade and population movements spread the Hallstatt culture of complications into the western side of Britain. It is plausible that some if not all of this circulation took place in a Celtic-speaking context.
    [Show full text]
  • Urnfield’ As a Chronological and Cultural Concept: Tales from Northern and Central Europe
    HENRI K THRANE The impact of 19th century ideas on the construction of ‘urnfield’ as a chronological and cultural concept: tales from Northern and Central Europe MARIE LO UISE STIG SØRENSEN, KAT H ARINA CHRISTINA RebaY‑SALISBURY Cemeteries with cremations in urns were lectual tension between approaching these known from most of Europe before archaeology changes in terms of local developments and the became a distinct discipline, and various more or simulta neous presumption of the introduction less fanciful speculations about them can be found of urnfields being an almost pan‑European phe‑ in the earlier literature. By the late 18th and early nomenon is reflected in interesting terminological 19th century it had, however, become common in ambiguities, which have been furthered by the sin‑ academic circles to understand urns as a specific gular focus upon a change in burial ritual rather burial practice, and as archaeology became than more broadly based changes of society. The increasingly preoccupied with the concept of time terminological ambiguity is clearly reflected in and its divisions there was an increasing interest the concurrent reference to the Urnfield culture in placing this burial rite within chronological in singular and plural (Urnenfelderkultur as well schemes. Otto Tischler might have been the first as Urnenfelderkulturen) and in the consistent to speak of ‘urn fields of the Bronze Age’ in 1886 referencing to both an Urnfield culture and an (Probst 1996, p. 258), but by the late 19th century the Urnfield period. Further ambiguities arise from Bronze Age had become divided in various ways the reluctance of some scholars to acknowledge with the dominant schema in Central Europe being ‘urnfield’ as a ‘culture’, using terms such as phe‑ based on characteristics of burial forms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study in Urnfield Interpretations in Middle Europe
    A Study in Urnfield Interpretations in Middle Europe M. A. SMITH Oxford The Urnfield cultures of the European Late Bronze Age appear most often as abrupt interruptions in the archaelogical record of the various regions they occupy. They are characterised by large cemeteries in which deposit of enurned cremations in flat (ditch) graves is the standard rite, though inhumation and the use of barrows or other alternative grave forms are not unknown among them. The often rich grave offerings con­ sist of fine pottery, and bronzes, of types which show no direct derivation from the inhuming, Tumulus cultures ( Hügelgraberkulturen ) of the fore­ going Middle Bronze Age in the regions concerned. In distribution, the Urnfield groups tend to concentrate on areas suited to agriculture, though contrast with a predominantly upland distribution of Tumulus culture has in the past perhaps been overstressed. Finally, though associated settle­ ment has in general been far less studied than the cemeteries, it is to the Urnfield cultures that introduction of hill-forts is ascribed; it would seem, however, that these defences were built during advanced rather than initial phases of Urnfield history. Urnfield cultures so characterised came to occupy most of the area extending from the fringes of the Alps northward to the Central German mountain ranges and their eastward continuations in the Sudeten mountains, roughly between the Rhineland in the west and the line of the Little Carpathians in the east, which is conveniently expressed by the German term Mitteleuropa. The map (Fig. 1) shows the regions of Germa­ ny, Austria, Switzerland and Czechoslovakia chiefly affected, with the main provincial divisions of these, and of surrounding territories révélant Zephyrus-VIH-13.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sintashta Culture and Some Questions of Indo-Europeans Origins
    THE SINTASHTA CULTURE AND SOME QUESTIONS OF INDO-EUROPEANS ORIGINS. S.A.Grigoryev [email protected] Institute of history and archaeology. Ural brunch of Russian Academy of Sciences. Chelyabinsk.Russia Origins of Indo-Europeans is one of the most significant problems of history, archaeology and linguistics. This problem has already been discussed for 200 years after the kinship of Indo-European languages was demonstrated. Various scholars localised the Indo-European homeland in different places of Eurasian continent. Diverse points of view have been examined recently by J.P. Mallory [1]. He has shown that the Indo-European homeland’s localisation in Northern or Central Europe is impossible because cultures of these regions have successors neither in Steppe zone nor in Anatolia, Iran and India. Any attempts to search for such successors there for Balkan cultures have no chance of success, except Anatolia. The most popular now is the theory placing Indo-European homeland in Steppe of Eastern Europe [2]. J.P.Mallory called this theory the“conventional wisdom” of Indo-European studies. This theory proposes a local development of East-European cultures from Enaeolithic to Pit-grave culture, Catacomb culture, Timber-grave (or Srubnaya) culture and Andronovo culture, which migrated south to India. It is the most convincing theory today, but it contains some important defects. Catacomb and Pit-grave cultures have no genetic connection. Timber-grave and Andronovo cultures have no such connection with Catacomb culture too. Cultures of Scithian and Sarmatian world were not forming on the basis of the Late Bronze Age cultures placed from Dnieper river to the Altai.
    [Show full text]
  • Redefining Pre-Indo-European Language Families of Bronze Age
    European Scientific Journal September 2019 edition Vol.15, No.26 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 Redefining Pre-Indo-European Language Families of Bronze Age Western Europe: A Study Based on the Synthesis of Scientific Evidence From Archaeology, Historical Linguistics and Genetics Csaba Barnabas Horvath, PhD Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary Doi:10.19044/esj.2019.v15n26p1 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n26p1 Abstract When and how did the Indo-European language family expand into western Europe? What language families were present there before, and where did they come from? Where does Basque and Etruscan come from? These are questions and puzzles that have been in the focus of the archaeological community since long ago. The present paper offers a coherent hypothesis mapping the expansion of language families in the western half of Europe from the Copper Age till the Roman conquest, based on matchings identifies between the newest genetic evidence, and earlier results of archaeology and historical linguistics. The approach focuses on matching phylogenetic and geographical distribution patterns of Y-DNA lineages with archaeological cultures, and the phylogenetics of language families in order to identify migrations and language families in Western Europe in the 3rd-1st millennia BCE. Keywords: Indo-European, pre-Celtic, Basque, Etruscan, Vasconic, Tyrsenian Introduction This paper makes an attempt to identify how Indo-European expansion took place in the western half of Europe, and what major pre-Indo-European language families may have been present in the region, and aims to answer this question by a synthesis of archaeological and linguistic data with the newest genetic results.
    [Show full text]