Collision Tectonics THIS VOLUME IS DEDICATED to the WORK of ROBERT M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Collision Tectonics THIS VOLUME IS DEDICATED to the WORK of ROBERT M Collision Tectonics THIS VOLUME IS DEDICATED TO THE WORK OF ROBERT M. SHACKLETON F.R.S. GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 19 Collision Tectonics EDITED BY M. P. COWARD & ALISON C. RIES* Department of Geology, Imperial College, London, UK and *Earth Resources Institute, University College of Swansea, Swansea, UK 1986 Published for the Geological Society by Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford • London • Edinburgh • Boston Palo Alto • Melbourne Published by DISTRIBUTORS Blackwell Scientific Publications USA and Canada Osney Mead, Oxford OX2 0EL Blackwell Scientific Publications Inc. 8 John Street, London WC1N 2ES PO Box 50009, Palo Alto 23 Ainslie Place, Edinburgh EH3 6AJ California 94303 52 Beacon Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02108, USA Australia 667 Lytton Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94301, USA Blackwell Scientific Publications 107 Barry Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia (Australia) Pty Ltd 107 Barry Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053 First published 1986 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data © 1986 The Geological Society. Authorization to Collision tectonics. -- (Geological Society special photocopy items for internal or personal use, or publication, ISSN 0305-8719; no. 19) the internal or personal use of specific clients, 1. Plate tectonics is granted by The Geological Society for libraries I. Coward, M.P. II. Ries, Alison C. and other users registered with the Copyright III. Geological Society of London IV. Series Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting 551.1'36 QE511.4 Service, provided that a base fee of $02.00 per copy is paid directly to CCC, 27 Congress Street, Salem, MA 01970, USA. ISBN 0-632-01211-0 0305-8719/86 $02.00. Printed in Great Britain by the Alden Press Ltd, Oxford Contents Preface I: WATSON,J. V ......................................................... vii Preface II: DEWEY, J. F ......................................................... ix Introduction: COWARD, M. P. & RIES, A. C ........................................ xi PROCESSES OF COLLISION OROGENY DEWEY, J. F., HEMPTON, M. R., KIDD, W. S. F., SAROGLU, F. & ~ENGt)R, A. M. C. Shortening of continental 'lithosphere: the neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia -- a young collision zone ........................................................ 3 MATTAUER, M. Intracontinental subduction, crust-mantle d6collement and crustal-stacking wedge in the Himalayas and other collision belts ................. 37 KNIPE, R. J. & NEEDHAM, D. T. Deformation processes in accretionary wedges -- examples from the SW margin of the Southern Uplands, Scotland ................ 51 HARRIS, N. B. W., PEARCE, J. A. & TINDLE, A. G. Geochemical characteristics of collision-zone magmatism ................................................... 67 ENGLAND, P. C. & THOMPSON, A. Some thermal and tectonic models for crustal melting in continental collision zones ................................................ 83 MURRELL, S. A. F. Mechanics of tectogenesis in plate collision zones .................. 95 CONTINENT- CONTINENT COLLISION Himalayan-Alpine Belt TAPPONNIER, P., PELTZER, G. & ARMIJO, R. On the mechanics of the collision between India and Asia ............................................................. 115 LE FORT, P. Metamorphism and magmatism during the Himalayan collision ............ 159 COLCHEN, M., MASCLE, G. & VAN HAVER, T. Some aspects of collision tectonics in the Indus Suture Zone, Ladakh ................................................. 173 SEARLE, M. P. & FRYER, B. J. Garnet, tourmaline and muscovite-bearing leucogranites, gneisses and migmatites of the Higher Himalayas from Zanskar, Kulu, Lahoul and Kashmir .................................................................. 185 COWARD, M. P., WINDLEY, B. F., BROUGHTON, R. D., LUFF, I. W., PETTERSON, M. G., PUDSEY, C. J., REX, D. C. & ASlF KHAN, M. Collision tectonics in the NW Himalayas ................................................................ 203 HUNZII,:ER, J. C. The Alps: a case of multiple collision .............................. 221 RIcov, L. E. & SIDDANS, A. W. B. Collision tectonics in the Western Alps ............ 229 BUTLER, R. W. H., MA~HEWS, S. J. & PARISH, M. The NW external Alpine Thrust Belt and its implications for the geometry of the Western Alpine Orogen .............. 245 CHANNELL, J. E. T. Palaeomagnetism and continental collision in the Alpine Belt and the formation of late-tectonic extensional basins ................................... 261 Older collision belts HOSSACK, J. R. & COOPER, M. A. Collision tectonics in the Scandinavian Caledonides ... 287 HAWKESWORTH, C. J., MENZIES, M. A. & VAN CALSTEREN, P. Geochemical and tectonic evolution of the Damara Belt, Namibia .............................. : ........ 305 DALY, M. C. The intracratonic Irumide Belt of Zambia and its bearing on collision orogeny during the Proterozoic of Africa ...................................... 321 SHACKLETON, R. M. Precambrian collision tectonics in Africa ........................ 329 CONTINENT- ARC COLLISION MILSOM, J. & AUDLEY-Cr~ARLES, M. G. Post-collision isostatic readjustment in the Southern Banda Arc ....................................................... 353 vi Contents CORDILLERAN COLLISION JONES, D. L., SILBERLING,N. J. & CONEY, P. J. Collision tectonics in the Cordillera of western N America: examples from Alaska .................................... 367 DALZIEL, I. W. D. Collision and Cordilleran orogenesis: an Andean perspective ........ 389 INDEX ........................................................................ 405 Preface I The orogenic belts that result from the collision of crustal plates form a worldwide system whose origins go back for several hundred million years. The spectacular topographical forms of these belts were familiar to man long before the emergence of geology as an independent science. The geologists of the eighteenth and early nineteenth century felt no doubts about the need to examine fundamental structures such as mountain belts on a global scale. More than a quarter of the 180 papers published in the first three volumes of the Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London (1845-7) were concerned with overseas terranes; and the same volumes included a substantial paper by R. I. Murchison on the relationships of the Lower Palaeozoic of Scandinavia and the Baltic area and another, even more comprehensive, on the structure of the Alps, Apennines and Carpathians. The relevance of direct observation in the field was equally well understood; in volume 3 of the Quarterly Journal, Daniel Sharpe demonstrated the implications of rock cleavage with respect to the effects of compression and Henry de la Beche included in his Presidential Address an interesting analysis of Appalachian folds as indicators of crustal shortening. At the present day, the range of phenomena to be accounted for in the development of collisional orogenic belts and the diversity of scales on which they must be examined, continue to challenge the ingenuity of earth scientists. The massive build-up of factual data and the advent of many specialized techniques make it increasingly hard for an individual geologist to master any major topic as a whole and discussion meetings involving a number of contributors have, to a large extent, replaced the single authoritative review as a means of arriving at a general picture. The William Smith Lectures of the Geological Society, established in 1944 to provide annual occasions for reviews of topics of current interest, have accordingly evolved into William Smith Meetings built around the principal lecture but providing ample scope for contributions from other specialists. The William Smith Meeting of April 1983, of which the present volume is the outcome, touched on many aspects of the collision process, clarified many new fields of investigation and highlighted some of the problems that remain to be solved. Many of those who took part are former students or colleagues of Professor R. M. Shackleton, the William Smith Lecturer, whose address formed the culmination of the meeting. This special volume therefore stands not only as a record of the progress of research in an important branch of earth science but also as a personal tribute to an outstanding field geologist, whose experience and acumen have become legendary. JANET WATSON t (President 1982-4) * Deceased 1985. Preface II Robert Shackleton stands almost alone in the earth sciences as a field observer of unrivalled ability. He has a most acute geometric sense and a talent for quickly unravelling complex structures and reducing them to their fundamental essentials. These abilities, coupled with more than half a century of field experience in, among other places, Africa, Arabia, the British Caledonides, S America and Fiji, make Robert a most perceptive and formidable field-based generalist of the kind that is tragically becoming a rare species in modern earth science. Field observation has been central to his life's work and is mostly encapsulated in a set of field notebooks numbering some 150. A man of enormous energy and fitness, his interests have centred principally around structural geology and tectonics at all scales. Robert's career began in Liverpool where he gained his Ph.D in 1932 on the geology of Moel Hebog, at which time began his lifetime love of North Wales geology. Between 1932 and 1934 he was Beit Research Fellow at Imperial College and also worked for Whitehall Securities in Fiji. From 1934 to 1940 and from 1945 to 1948, Robert lectured at Imperial College and began
Recommended publications
  • Frontiers in Earth Sciences
    Frontiers in Earth Sciences Series Editors: J.P. Brun, O. Oncken, H. Weissert, W.-C. Dullo . Dennis Brown • Paul D. Ryan Editors Arc-Continent Collision Editors Dr. Dennis Brown Dr. Paul D. Ryan Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra National University of Ireland, Galway “Jaume Almera”, CSIC Dept. Earth & Ocean Sciences (EOS) C/ Lluis Sole i Sabaris s/n University Road 08028 Barcelona Galway Spain Ireland [email protected] [email protected] This publication was grant-aided by the National University of Ireland, Galway ISBN 978-3-540-88557-3 e-ISBN 978-3-540-88558-0 DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88558-0 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011931205 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: deblik, Berlin Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Preface One of the key areas of research in the Earth Sciences are processes that occur along the boundaries of the tectonic plates that make up Earth’s lithosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Contrasting Phanerozoic Orogenic Systems Revealed by Hafnium Isotope Data William J
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 17 APRIL 2011 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1127 Two contrasting Phanerozoic orogenic systems revealed by hafnium isotope data William J. Collins1*(, Elena A. Belousova2, Anthony I. S. Kemp1 and J. Brendan Murphy3 Two fundamentally different orogenic systems have existed on Earth throughout the Phanerozoic. Circum-Pacific accretionary orogens are the external orogenic system formed around the Pacific rim, where oceanic lithosphere semicontinuously subducts beneath continental lithosphere. In contrast, the internal orogenic system is found in Europe and Asia as the collage of collisional mountain belts, formed during the collision between continental crustal fragments. External orogenic systems form at the boundary of large underlying mantle convection cells, whereas internal orogens form within one supercell. Here we present a compilation of hafnium isotope data from zircon minerals collected from orogens worldwide. We find that the range of hafnium isotope signatures for the external orogenic system narrows and trends towards more radiogenic compositions since 550 Myr ago. By contrast, the range of signatures from the internal orogenic system broadens since 550 Myr ago. We suggest that for the external system, the lower crust and lithospheric mantle beneath the overriding continent is removed during subduction and replaced by newly formed crust, which generates the radiogenic hafnium signature when remelted. For the internal orogenic system, the lower crust and lithospheric mantle is instead eventually replaced by more continental lithosphere from a collided continental fragment. Our suggested model provides a simple basis for unravelling the global geodynamic evolution of the ancient Earth. resent-day orogens of contrasting character can be reduced to which probably began by the Early Ordovician12, and the Early two types on Earth, dominantly accretionary or dominantly Paleozoic accretionary orogens in the easternmost Altaids of Pcollisional, because only the latter are associated with Wilson Asia13.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinematic Reconstruction of the Caribbean Region Since the Early Jurassic
    Earth-Science Reviews 138 (2014) 102–136 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Kinematic reconstruction of the Caribbean region since the Early Jurassic Lydian M. Boschman a,⁎, Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen a, Trond H. Torsvik b,c,d, Wim Spakman a,b, James L. Pindell e,f a Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands b Center for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, Sem Sælands vei 24, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway c Center for Geodynamics, Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7491 Trondheim, Norway d School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS 2050 Johannesburg, South Africa e Tectonic Analysis Ltd., Chestnut House, Duncton, West Sussex, GU28 OLH, England, UK f School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3YE, UK article info abstract Article history: The Caribbean oceanic crust was formed west of the North and South American continents, probably from Late Received 4 December 2013 Jurassic through Early Cretaceous time. Its subsequent evolution has resulted from a complex tectonic history Accepted 9 August 2014 governed by the interplay of the North American, South American and (Paleo-)Pacific plates. During its entire Available online 23 August 2014 tectonic evolution, the Caribbean plate was largely surrounded by subduction and transform boundaries, and the oceanic crust has been overlain by the Caribbean Large Igneous Province (CLIP) since ~90 Ma. The consequent Keywords: absence of passive margins and measurable marine magnetic anomalies hampers a quantitative integration into GPlates Apparent Polar Wander Path the global circuit of plate motions.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Terrane Boundaries and Suture Zones Across Southern Mongolia Detected with a 2‑Dimensional Magnetotelluric Transect Matthew J
    Comeau et al. Earth, Planets and Space (2020) 72:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-1131-6 FULL PAPER Open Access Evidence for terrane boundaries and suture zones across Southern Mongolia detected with a 2-dimensional magnetotelluric transect Matthew J. Comeau1* , Michael Becken1, Johannes S. Käuf2, Alexander V. Grayver2, Alexey V. Kuvshinov2, Shoovdor Tserendug3, Erdenechimeg Batmagnai2 and Sodnomsambuu Demberel3 Abstract Southern Mongolia is part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, the origin and evolution of which is not fully known and is often debated. It is composed of several east–west trending lithostratigraphic domains that are attributed to an assemblage of accreted terranes or tectonic zones. This is in contrast to Central Mongolia, which is dominated by a cratonic block in the Hangai region. Terranes are typically bounded by suture zones that are expected to be deep- reaching, but may be difcult to identify based on observable surface fault traces alone. Thus, attempts to match lithostratigraphic domains to surface faulting have revealed some disagreements in the positions of suspected terranes. Furthermore, the subsurface structure of this region remains relatively unknown. Therefore, high-resolution geophysical data are required to determine the locations of terrane boundaries. Magnetotelluric data and telluric-only data were acquired across Southern Mongolia on a profle along a longitude of approximately 100.5° E. The profle extends ~ 350 km from the Hangai Mountains, across the Gobi–Altai Mountains, to the China–Mongolia border. The data were used to generate an electrical resistivity model of the crust and upper mantle, presented here, that can contribute to the understanding of the structure of this region, and of the evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermochronology of the Miocene Arabia-Eurasia Collision Zone of Southeastern Turkey GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Thermochronology of the Miocene Arabia-Eurasia collision zone of southeastern Turkey GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 5 William Cavazza1, Silvia Cattò1, Massimiliano Zattin2, Aral I. Okay3, and Peter Reiners4 1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01637.1 2Department of Geosciences, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy 3Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak 34469, Istanbul, Turkey 4Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 9 figures; 3 tables CORRESPONDENCE: william .cavazza@ unibo.it ABSTRACT ocean, and has been linked to mid-Cenozoic global cooling, Red Sea rifting, extension in the Aegean region, inception of the North and East Anatolian CITATION: Cavazza, W., Cattò, S., Zattin, M., Okay, The Bitlis-Pütürge collision zone of SE Turkey is the area of maximum in- strike-slip fault systems, and development of the Anatolian-Iranian continental A.I., and Reiners, P., 2018, Thermochronology of the Miocene Arabia-Eurasia collision zone of southeast- dentation along the >2400-km-long Assyrian-Zagros suture between Arabia and plateau (e.g., Şengör and Kidd, 1979; Dewey et al., 1986; Jolivet and Faccenna, ern Turkey: Geosphere, v. 14, no. 5, p. 2277–2293, Eurasia. The integration of (i) fission-track analyses on apatites, ii( ) (U-Th)/He 2000; Barazangi et al., 2006; Robertson et al., 2007; Allen and Armstrong, 2008; https:// doi .org /10 .1130 /GES01637.1. analyses on zircons, (iii ) field observations on stratigraphic and structural rela- Yılmaz et al., 2010). The age of the continental collision has been the topic of tionships, and (iv) preexisting U-Pb and Ar-Ar age determinations on zircons, much debate, with proposed ages ranging widely from the Late Cretaceous to Science Editor: Raymond M.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Collisional Formation of the Alpine Foreland Rifts
    Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae (1991) vol. 61:37 - 59 PL ISSN 0208-9068 POST-COLLISIONAL FORMATION OF THE ALPINE FORELAND RIFTS E. Craig Jowett Department of Earth Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada N2L 3G1 Jowett, E. C., 1991. Post-collisional formation of the Alpine foreland rifts. Ann. Soc. Geol. Polon., 6 1 :37-59. Abstract: A series of Cenozoic rift zones with bimodal volcanic rocks form a discontinuous arc parallel to the Alpine mountain chain in the foreland region of Europe from France to Czechos­ lovakia. The characteristics of these continental rifts include: crustal thinning to 70-90% of the regional thickness, in cases with corresponding lithospheric thinning; alkali basalt or bimodal igneous suites; normal block faulting; high heat flow and hydrothermal activity; regional uplift; and immature continental to marine sedimentary rocks in hydrologically closed basins. Preceding the rifting was the complex Alpine continental collision orogeny which is characterized by: crustal shortening; thrusting and folding; limited calc-alkaline igneous activity; high pressure metamorphism; and marine flysch and continental molasse deposits in the foreland region. Evidence for the direction of subduction in the central area is inconclusive, although northerly subduction likely occurred in the eastern and western Tethys. The rift events distinctly post-date the thrusthing and shortening periods of the orogeny, making “impactogen” models of formation untenable. However, the succession of tectonic and igneous events, the geophysical characteristics, and the timing and location of these rifts are very similar to those of the Late Cenozoic Basin and Range province in the western USA and the Early Permian Rotliegendes troughs in Central Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Preprint
    EarthArXiv Coversheet 29/04/2021 Caribbean plate boundaries control on the tectonic duality in the back-arc of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone during the Eocene N. G. Cerpa*, R. Hassani, D. Arcay, S. Lallemand, C. Garrocq, M. Philippon, J.-J. Cornée, P. Münch, F. Garel, B. Marcaillou, B. Mercier de Lépinay, and J.-F. Lebrun * corresponding author : [email protected] This manuscript is a non-peer reviewed preprint submitted to Tectonics and thus may be periodically revised. The final version will be available via the ‘Peer-review Publication DOI’ link on the right-hand side of this webpage. Please feel free to contact the corresponding author; we welcome feedback. Caribbean plate boundaries control on the tectonic duality in the back-arc of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone during the Eocene N. G. Cerpa1,2,*, R. Hassani2, D. Arcay1, S. Lallemand1, C. Garrocq1, M. Philippon3, J.-J. Cornée3, P. Münch1, F. Garel1, B. Marcaillou2, B. Mercier de Lépinay2, and J.-F. Lebrun3 1 Geosciences Montpellier, University de Montpellier, CNRS, Université des Antilles, Montpellier, France. 2 Geoazur, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, IRD, Valbonne, France. 3 Geosciences Montpellier, Université des Antilles, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Guadeloupe, France. *Corresponding author: Nestor G. Cerpa ([email protected]) Abstract The Eocene tectonic evolution of the easternmost Caribbean Plate (CP) boundary, i.e. the Lesser Antilles subduction zone (LASZ), is debated. Recents works shed light on a peculiar period of tectonic duality in the arc/back-arc regions. A compressive-to-transpressive regime occurred in the north, while rifting and seafloor spreading occurred in Grenada basin to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-African Orogeny 1
    Encyclopedia 0f Geology (2004), vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam AFRICA/Pan-African Orogeny 1 Contents Pan-African Orogeny North African Phanerozoic Rift Valley Within the Pan-African domains, two broad types of Pan-African Orogeny orogenic or mobile belts can be distinguished. One type consists predominantly of Neoproterozoic supracrustal and magmatic assemblages, many of juvenile (mantle- A Kröner, Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany R J Stern, University of Texas-Dallas, Richardson derived) origin, with structural and metamorphic his- TX, USA tories that are similar to those in Phanerozoic collision and accretion belts. These belts expose upper to middle O 2005, Elsevier Ltd. All Rights Reserved. crustal levels and contain diagnostic features such as ophiolites, subduction- or collision-related granitoids, lntroduction island-arc or passive continental margin assemblages as well as exotic terranes that permit reconstruction of The term 'Pan-African' was coined by WQ Kennedy in their evolution in Phanerozoic-style plate tectonic scen- 1964 on the basis of an assessment of available Rb-Sr arios. Such belts include the Arabian-Nubian shield of and K-Ar ages in Africa. The Pan-African was inter- Arabia and north-east Africa (Figure 2), the Damara- preted as a tectono-thermal event, some 500 Ma ago, Kaoko-Gariep Belt and Lufilian Arc of south-central during which a number of mobile belts formed, sur- and south-western Africa, the West Congo Belt of rounding older cratons. The concept was then extended Angola and Congo Republic, the Trans-Sahara Belt of to the Gondwana continents (Figure 1) although West Africa, and the Rokelide and Mauretanian belts regional names were proposed such as Brasiliano along the western Part of the West African Craton for South America, Adelaidean for Australia, and (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Stylolites: Characteristics and Origin
    • STYLOLITES: CHARACTERISTICS AND ORIGIN Joseph M. Montello A senior thesis submitted to fulfill the requirements for the degree of B.S. in Geology and Mineralogy • Winter Quarter, 1984 The Ohio State University ~2.~r·Thesis Advisor Department of Geology and Mineralogy Abstract • Stylolites are alternating interpenetrating columns of stone that form irregular interlocking partings or sutures in rock strata. They are most common along bedding planes of limestone but some are oblique or even perpendicular to bedding . Although the vast majority of stylolites occur in calcareous rocks, stylolites have been found in sandstone, quartzite and gypsum. The word "stylolite" refers to each individual column of stone. A cross section of a group of stylolites parallel to their length presents a rough, jagged line called a "stylolite seam" that resembles the sutures of a human skull. Stylolites always have a dark colored "clay" cap at the ends of the columns. The sides of the columns are typically discolored with a thin film of clay and show parallel flutings or striations that parallel their length. The shapes of individual stylolites vary greatly from broad flat­ • topped columns to pointed, jagged and tapering forms. After much controversy concerning the origin of stylolites, it is generally believed that they form by a process of chemical solution under pressure in lithified rock along some crack or seam. The interteething is produced because of differential solubilities and pressures within the rock unit. The clay cap on the stylolites is the non-soluble residue of the dissolved rock. Stylolites are only one of the possible end products in the spectrum of limestone responses to stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepwater Fold-And-Thrust Belt Along New Caledonia's Western Margin
    Deepwater fold-and-thrust belt along New Caledonia’s western margin: relation to post-obduction vertical motions J. Collot, M. Patriat, S. Etienne, P. Rouillard, F. Soetaert, C Juan, B. Marcaillou, Giulia Palazzin, Camille Clerc, P. Maurizot, et al. To cite this version: J. Collot, M. Patriat, S. Etienne, P. Rouillard, F. Soetaert, et al.. Deepwater fold-and-thrust belt along New Caledonia’s western margin: relation to post-obduction vertical motions. Tectonics, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2017, 36, pp.2108-2122. 10.1002/2017TC004542. insu-01614136 HAL Id: insu-01614136 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01614136 Submitted on 24 Oct 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. PUBLICATIONS Tectonics RESEARCH ARTICLE Deepwater Fold-and-Thrust Belt Along New 10.1002/2017TC004542 Caledonia’s Western Margin: Relation Key Points: to Post-obduction Vertical Motions • New deepwater fold-and-thrust belt discovered off New Caledonia’s J. Collot1 , M. Patriat1,2 , S. Etienne1,3 , P. Rouillard1,3,4, F. Soetaert1,2, C. Juan1, western margin 5 6 7 1 1,3 1,3 1 • Origin of the deepwater B. Marcaillou , G. Palazzin , C.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Orogeny
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 6, 2021 PROCESSES OF COLLISION OROGENY Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 6, 2021 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 6, 2021 Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia a young collision zone J.F. Dewey, M.R. Hempton, W.S.F. Kidd, F. Saroglu & A.M.C. ~eng6r SUMMARY: We use the tectonics of Eastern Anatolia to exemplify many of the different aspects of collision tectonics, namely the formation of plateaux, thrust belts, foreland flexures, widespread foreland/hinterland deformation zones and orogenic collapse/distension zones. Eastern Anatolia is a 2 km high plateau bounded to the S by the southward-verging Bitlis Thrust Zone and to the N by the Pontide/Minor Caucasus Zone. It has developed as the surface expression of a zone of progressively thickening crust beginning about 12 Ma in the medial Miocene and has resulted from the squeezing and shortening of Eastern Anatolia between the Arabian and European Plates following the Serravallian demise of the last oceanic or quasi- oceanic tract between Arabia and Eurasia. Thickening of the crust to about 52 km has been accompanied by major strike-slip faulting on the rightqateral N Anatolian Transform Fault (NATF) and the left-lateral E Anatolian Transform Fault (EATF) which approximately bound an Anatolian Wedge that is being driven westwards to override the oceanic lithosphere of the Mediterranean along subduction zones from Cephalonia to Crete, and Rhodes to Cyprus. This neotectonic regime began about 12 Ma in Late Serravallian times with uplift from wide- spread littoral/neritic marine conditions to open seasonal wooded savanna with coiluvial, fluvial and limnic environments, and the deposition of the thick Tortonian Kythrean Flysch in the Eastern Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Zagros Orogeny
    Zagros orogeny: a subduction-dominated process Philippe Agard, Jafar Omrani, Laurent Jolivet, Hubert Whitechurch, Bruno Vrielynck, Wim Spakman, Patrick Monié, Bertrand Meyer, R. Wortel To cite this version: Philippe Agard, Jafar Omrani, Laurent Jolivet, Hubert Whitechurch, Bruno Vrielynck, et al.. Zagros orogeny: a subduction-dominated process. Geological Magazine, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2011, 148 (5-6), pp.692-725. 10.1017/S001675681100046X. insu-00616582 HAL Id: insu-00616582 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00616582 Submitted on 4 Feb 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Geol. Mag. 148 (5–6), 2011, pp. 692–725. c Cambridge University Press 2011 692 doi:10.1017/S001675681100046X Zagros orogeny: a subduction-dominated process P. AGARD∗†, J. OMRANI‡, L. JOLIVET§, H. WHITECHURCH¶, B. VRIELYNCK∗, W. SPAKMAN,P.MONIÉ#,B.MEYER∗ &R. WORTEL ∗ISTEP, UMR 7193, Université Pierre et Marie Curie – Université Paris 6, 4 pl. Jussieu, Paris 75005, France ‡Geological Survey of Iran, Tehran, Iran §ISTO, Université d’Orléans, France ¶EOST, Strasbourg, France Geosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands #Géosciences Montpellier, UMR 5573, Université Montpellier 2, France (Received 17 January 2011; accepted 3 May 2011; first published online 5 July 2011) Abstract – This paper presents a synthetic view of the geodynamic evolution of the Zagros orogen within the frame of the Arabia–Eurasia collision.
    [Show full text]