Habitats and Species Covered by the Article 17 Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Habitats and Species Covered by the Article 17 Report HABITATS DIRECTIVE ARTICLE 17 REPORT ( 2001 – 2006 ) HABITATS AND SPECIES COVERED BY THE ARTICLE 17 REPORT This paper is part of the web-based Article 17 Technical Report (2001-2006) http://biodiversity.eionet.europa.eu/article17 compiled by the European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity for the European Commission (DG Environment) DISCLAIMER: The contents of this paper do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Environment Agency, the European Commission or other European Communities institutions. ETC/BD, Paris, 2008 Article 17 Technical Report (2001-2006) Habitats and species covered by the Article 17 report At the end of the reporting period 2001-2006 the annexes of the Directive listed 216 European habitats on Annex I and approximately 1180 species1 on Annexes II, IV and V2. The Annex I habitats are described in the ‘Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats’3 and discussed in Evans (2006)4. The number of the habitats and species reported by each Member State is shown on Table 1 for each annex of the Directive. At the European level Article 17 report covers all the 216 habitats and 1182 species, however there are few species for which no report was provided. In terms of species and habitats of community interest (as defined in the directive), diversity is concentrated in the Mediterranean basin and Macaronesian region. The larger countries in this area (Italy, France and Spain) have over 100 habitats and more than 200 Annex II species. The number of the occasional, marginal and extinct habitats and species per biogeographical region for each Member State can be found in the National Summaries (http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/monnat/library?l=/habitats_reporting/reporting_2001-2007/ms- reports_summaries&vm=detailed&sb=Title) and lists of species in the Reporting Checklists (http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/monnat/library?l=/habitats_reporting/reporting_2001-2007/ms- reports_checklists&vm=detailed&sb=Title). Conservation status was assessed separately for each biogeographical region present in a Member State; the number of assessments per country is shown on Table 2. Not all of the Member States reported for all of the habitats and species which are thought to be present in their territory, however this is a very small percentage of all of the habitats and species. If other sources refer to the presence of the habitat and species in the territory of a Member State this has been noted in the Datasheet for that habitat or species. Several countries reported species which do not have a stable population in the territory of that Member State (occasional species), or occurs there marginally. Reports were received for 119 occasional, marginal and vagrant species; these are not included in the statistics presented below. Similarly these species are not included in the number of the assessments on Table 2. Appendix 1 gives detailed information on the number of habitats and species in each biogeographical and marine region. 1 In some cases this includes subspecies or genera 2 Further habitats and species were added to the annexes in January 2007 when Bulgaria and Romania joined the EU. 3 http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/habitatsdirective/docs/2007_07_im.pdf 4 Evans, D. (2006) The habitats of the European Union Habitats Directive. Biology and the Environment (Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy) 106B(3) 167-173 http://www.ria.ie/cgi- bin/ria/papers/100619.pdf Habitats and species covered by the Article 17 report 1 Article 17 Technical Report (2001-2006) Table 1 - Number of the habitats and species reported by each Member State (note that one species may be listed on two annexes) HABITATS SPECIES MS Annex I Annex II Annex IV Annex V BE 58 44 51 21 CZ 60 107 119 24 DK 58 36 42 15 DE 91 108 109 88 EE 60 51 58 23 IE 59 26 35 20 EL 85 129 197 26 ES 118 267 344 44 FR 132 159 204 53 IT 130 194 249 35 CY 48 35 50 0 LV 57 60 67 27 LT 54 49 59 29 LU 29 23 36 16 HU 46 140 158 26 MT 31 26 47 5 NL 51 36 48 21 AT 66 93 103 34 PL 79 121 127 31 PT 99 208 257 47 SI 50 116 130 41 SK 66 134 141 24 FI 69 83 67 21 SE 88 104 92 27 UK 83 46 51 25 EU 216 1182 Habitats and species covered by the Article 17 report 2 Article 17 Technical Report (2001-2006) Table 2 - Number of assessments of conservation status and number of biogeographical and marine regions for each Member State Number of Number of Number of assessments assessments biogeographical MS made for made for and marine habitats species regions BE 87 136 3 CZ 95 253 2 DK 108 108 4 DE 193 480 5 EE 60 96 2 IE 59 67 2 EL 85 242 2 ES 246 646 7 FR 303 658 6 IT 269 564 4 CY 48 50 2 LV 57 112 2 LT 54 103 2 LU 29 59 1 HU 46 207 1 MT 31 55 2 NL 51 84 2 AT 112 290 2 PL 112 270 3 PT 158 429 5 SI 89 336 3 SK 102 320 2 FI 92 144 3 SE 183 262 5 UK 87 93 4 All MS 2756 6064 11 EU 701 2240 11 Habitats and species covered by the Article 17 report 3 Article 17 Technical Report (2001-2006) Diversity of habitats and species from the annexes Habitat and species diversity was calculated using ArcGIS based on the number of Annex I habitats or Annex II, IV & V species present in each cell of a 10 x 10 km grid based on the grid maps of habitat and species distribution generalised by the ETC/BD. Diversity was indicated by colour with blue indicating low and red high diversity. To be noted that these diversity maps only concern habitats and species covered by the Habitats Directive and do not necessarily reflect the actual diversity in the field. Figure 1 - Habitat diversity across the European Union – see text for details Habitats and species covered by the Article 17 report 4 Article 17 Technical Report (2001-2006) Diversity of habitats across the EU25 is shown on Figure 1 which suggests that France is more diverse than other countries, but this is a result of the coarse resolution of the French distribution maps. It should also be noted that for 50% of habitats in Spain no map was available. This is discussed in more detail in the paper 'Data completeness, quality and coherence' available on the Article 17 web page. Although it is difficult to make comparisons between countries, the map clearly shows the areas within individual countries which are more diverse, for example in France the mountains of the Alps and Pyrenees, together with the coasts of Brittany and Normandy clearly have more habitats per 10 x 10 km cell than elsewhere. This is to be expected as a 10x10 km cell in the mountains will contain habitats typical of several altitude zones while a coastal cell will host both coastal (e.g. the several dune habitats included on Annex I) and more typically inland habitats. Mountains are visible as areas of high habitat diversity in many countries including the Czech Republic, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Figure 2 - Species diversity across the European Union – see text for details Habitats and species covered by the Article 17 report 5 Article 17 Technical Report (2001-2006) Diversity of species is shown on Figure 2; again it is difficult to make generalisations across the EU25 with 65% of Spanish species not being included in the analysis as no maps were provided. The published literature5 suggests that the Mediterranean basin should be more species diverse than northern or central Europe, but the map does not show this. This may be partly explained by the relatively large number of species with a restricted distribution, including many localised endemics, in the Mediterranean as shown in Figure 3 and by the unbalanced representation of Member States species in the annexes of the Directive. Figure 3 - Distribution of species of Community interest with a restricted distribution within the EU25 (see text for details) Species where the reported distribution falls within a box with an area of 10 000 km2 or less were identified using ArcGIS and these are shown on Figure 3. Some 416 species out of a total of 1 182 reported species (35%) have a very restricted distribution within the EU25. From these 416 species, 10 species are located in only one grid cell of 10 x10 km and another 186 are restricted to a rectangle of 1 000 km2. While a large number are endemics some are also found beyond the EU25 borders, some in EU Member States Bulgaria or Romania, and others in other European, African or Asian countries The list of these 416 species is in Appendix 2 Although Figure 3 combines EU25 endemics and species also found elsewhere the importance of the Mediterranean basin for endemic species is clearly shown. In fact this map underestimates its 5 For example see Médail, F. & Quézel, P. 1999. Biodiversity hotspots in the Mediterranean Basin: Setting global conservation priorities. Conservation Biology 13: 1510-1513 and Myers, N. & Cowling, R. 1999. Mediterranean Basin. In R.A. Mittermeier, N. Myers & C. Goettsch Mittermeier. (Eds.), Hotspots – Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. pp. 254-267. Mexico City: CEMEX & Conservation International Habitats and species covered by the Article 17 report 6 Article 17 Technical Report (2001-2006) importance as many species maps from Spain were missing.
Recommended publications
  • Fungi on Juncus Trifldus in the Czech Republic (II) with Taxonomical Notes to Some Species
    C z e c h m y c o l . 56 (3-4), 2004 Fungi on Juncus trifldus in the Czech Republic (II) with taxonomical notes to some species M a r k é t a S u k o v á 1 a n d A n d r z e j C h l e b ic k i2 National Museum, Mycological Department, Václavské nám. 68, CZ-115 79 Praha 1, Czech Republic, [email protected] “Polish Academy of Sciences, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Lubicz 46, PL-31 512 Kraków, Poland, [email protected] Suková M. and Chlebicki A. (2004): Fungi on Juncus trifidus in the Czech Republic (II) with taxonomical notes to some species - Czech Mycol. 56: 203-221 In this second contribution, other eight species of ascomycetes and anamorphic fungi on Juncus trifidus collected in the Czech Republic are described (Ascochyta junci, Lachnum diminutum, Phaeosphaeria vagans, Phialocephala sp., Pseudoseptoria sp., Pycnothyrium junci, Stagonospora junciseda, Unguicularia sp.). Additional localities of Arthrinium cuspidatum and Niptera eriophori described in the first contribution are given. A fungus previously published as Septoria sp. was identified as Septoria chanousiana. Additional material of some fungi (Ascochyta junci, Septoria chanousiana, S. minuta, Unguicularia millepunctata) from other substrata and countries was studied with the aim to compare it with material from Juncus trifidus from the Czech Republic. Numbers of fungi on Juncus trifidus at studied localities are discussed. Key words: Ascochyta, dark septate endophyte (DSE), Pseudoseptoria, Pycnothyrium, Septoria, Stagonospora, Unguicularia Suková M. a Chlebicki A. (2004): Houby na sítině Juncus trifidus v České republice (II) s taxonomickými poznámkami k některým druhům - Czech Mycol.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Grulich V. (2012): Red List of Vascular Plants of the Czech Republic: 3Rd Edition. – Preslia 84: 631–645. Electronic Appen
    Grulich V. (2012): Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic: 3rd edition. – Preslia 84: 631–645. Electronic Appendix 1. – Taxa included on the Red List of vascular plants of the flora of the Czech Republic. Red-List category, reason for classification in categories where applicable (see rext for details), and whether the threat refers to natural habitats only (indicated by ‘aut’ in the Habitat column) are given for each taxon. Taxa are ranked alphabetically within categories. Category Reason Habitat Taxon A1 aut Aldrovanda vesiculosa A1 Amaranthus graecizans subsp. sylvestris A1 aut Apera interrupta A1 Asperula arvensis A1 aut Astragalus asper A1 Avena strigosa A1 Betula humilis A1 Botrychium simplex A1 Camelina alyssum subsp. alyssum A1 Camelina alyssum subsp. integerrima A1 Ceratocephala orthoceras A1 Conringia austriaca A1 Cuscuta epilinum A1 Dactylorhiza curvifolia A1 Echinops ritro subsp. ruthenicus A1 Eleocharis uniglumis subsp. sterneri A1 Epilobium lanceolatum A1 Erigeron angulosus A1 Euclidium syriacum A1 Euphrasia corcontica A1 Galatella cana A1 Gentiana acaulis A1 Gentianella amarella subsp. lingulata A1 Gentianella campestris subsp. campestris A1 Gentianella campestris subsp. suecica A1 Gentianella germanica subsp. solstitialis A1 Gentianella praecox subsp. praecox A1 Geranium bohemicum A1 Geranium lucidum A1 Gymnadenia odoratissima A1 Helianthemum rupifragum A1 Herminium monorchis A1 Hieracium purkynei A1 Himantoglossum caprinum A1 Hymenophyllum tunbrigense A1 Inula salicina subsp. aspera A1 Iris spuria subsp. spuria
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Vascular Plants of the Czech Republic: 3Rd Edition
    Preslia 84: 631–645, 2012 631 Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic: 3rd edition Červený seznam cévnatých rostlin České republiky: třetí vydání Dedicated to the centenary of the Czech Botanical Society (1912–2012) VítGrulich Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-611 37 Brno, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Grulich V. (2012): Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic: 3rd edition. – Preslia 84: 631–645. The knowledge of the flora of the Czech Republic has substantially improved since the second ver- sion of the national Red List was published, mainly due to large-scale field recording during the last decade and the resulting large national databases. In this paper, an updated Red List is presented and compared with the previous editions of 1979 and 2000. The complete updated Red List consists of 1720 taxa (listed in Electronic Appendix 1), accounting for more then a half (59.2%) of the native flora of the Czech Republic. Of the Red-Listed taxa, 156 (9.1% of the total number on the list) are in the A categories, which include taxa that have vanished from the flora or are not known to occur at present, 471 (27.4%) are classified as critically threatened, 357 (20.8%) as threatened and 356 (20.7%) as endangered. From 1979 to 2000 to 2012, there has been an increase in the total number of taxa included in the Red List (from 1190 to 1627 to 1720) and in most categories, mainly for the following reasons: (i) The continuing human pressure on many natural and semi-natural habitats is reflected in the increased vulnerability or level of threat to many vascular plants; some vulnerable species therefore became endangered, those endangered critically threatened, while species until recently not classified may be included in the Red List as vulnerable or even endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Vascular Plants Endemic to the Krkonoše Mts (Western Sudetes)
    Preslia 78: 503–516, 2006 503 Species of vascular plants endemic to the Krkonoše Mts (Western Sudetes) Endemické druhy cévnatých rostlin v Krkonoších František K r a h u l e c Dedicated to Marcel Rejmánek Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ–252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Krahulec F. (2006): Species of vascular plants endemic to the Krkonoše Mts (Western Sudetes). – Preslia, Praha, 78: 503–506. This paper summarizes the present state of knowledge of the vascular plants endemic to the Krkonoše Mts. The species given in previous lists but excluded from the present one are also dis- cussed together with the history of opinion of their status. Some endemics are of Holocene age, e.g. Sorbus sudetica is the result of a past hybridization while others originated from continuous differ- entiation of small populations over time. Some endemic species of other genera, for example, Hieracium, Taraxacum and Alchemilla appear to be older in origin, representing relict populations which occurred at low altitudes at least during the last glacial period. Their age is unknown, because it is unknow, when and how they evolved. K e y w o r d s : apomicts, Czech Republic, endemics, Krkonoše, origin, Poland, small population differentiation Introduction In general, outside the high mountain areas of the Alps and the Carpathians, endemic species are relatively very rare in Central Europe. As usual, the list of endemics is dependent on tax- onomic treatment; especially the rank of the taxon. Lists of endemics of the Czech Republic are surprisingly rare: Hadač (1977) published an annotated list, Holub et al.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Fifth National Report
    The Fifth National Report of the Czech Republic to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 5 AN UPDATE ON BIODIVERSITY STATUS, TRENDS, AND THREATS .................................... 5 1.1 General overview of biodiversity status, trends and threats .................................................... 5 1.2 Assessment of the overall causes of threats to biological diversity in the Czech Republic .... 14 1.3. Agro biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 23 1.4. Forest biodiversity .................................................................................................................. 34 1.5 Biodiversity in inland waters ................................................................................................... 41 1.5. Mountain biodiversity ............................................................................................................ 46 1.6. Biodiversity and climate change ............................................................................................. 50 1.7. Protected areas, species and NATURA 2000 Network ........................................................... 55 CHAPTER 2 .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Vascular Plants Melanie Bilz, Shelagh P
    European Red List of Vascular Plants Melanie Bilz, Shelagh P. Kell, Nigel Maxted and Richard V. Lansdown European Red List of Vascular Plants Melanie Bilz, Shelagh P. Kell, Nigel Maxted and Richard V. Lansdown IUCN Global Species Programme IUCN Regional Office for Europe IUCN Species Survival Commission Published by the European Commission This publication has been prepared by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission or IUCN. Citation: Bilz, M., Kell, S.P., Maxted, N. and Lansdown, R.V. 2011. European Red List of Vascular Plants. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Design and layout by: Tasamim Design - www.tasamim.net Printed by: The Colchester Print Group, United Kingdom Picture credits on cover page: Narcissus nevadensis is endemic to Spain where it has a very restricted distribution. The species is listed as Endangered and is threatened by modifications to watercourses and overgrazing. © Juan Enrique Gómez. All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, http://bookshop.europa.eu IUCN Publications Services, www.iucn.org/publications A catalogue of IUCN publications is also available.
    [Show full text]
  • Example Studies for the Pan-European Ecological Network
    European corridors - example studies for the Pan-European Ecological Network 2 Alterra-report 1087 European corridors - example studies for the Pan-European Ecological Network Background document Editors: M. Bloemmen (coordination, management) T. van der Sluis (project leader, mammals) With contributions of: H. Baveco (METAPHOR modelling) I.M. Bouwma (project advisor, international policies) J. van der Greft (birds) G. Groot Bruinderink (mammals) B. Higler (aquatic invertebrates) H. Kuipers (LARCH modelling, maps) D. Lammertsma (mammals) F.G.W.A. Ottburg (fish) N. Smits (plants) C. van Swaay (butterflies) W.K.R.E. van Wingerden (terrestrial invertebrates) Alterra-report 1087 Alterra, Wageningen, 2004 ABSTRACT Bloemmen, M. & T. van der Sluis (eds.), 2004. European corridors - example studies for the Pan-European Ecological Network. Wageningen, Alterra, Alterra-report 1087. 102 p.; 16 figs.; 16 tables.; 148 refs. The concept of corridors is assessed in relation to corridor requirements for different species groups. A typology is further developed, and apllied for representative species. A strategy for corridor development is presented for species with a (European) protection status. Those species are selected that are dependent on large scale (international) corridors. Examples are given of practical solutions for habitat fragmentation for a selection of species. The species described are threatened in Europe, often, but not exclusively, due to fragmentation and loss of habitat. The species are protected under European and national legislation, and therefore they are relevant to the policies of European states. The result is a detailed analysis of required corridors, and other required measures for conservation of the species Keywords: birds, corridors, dispersal strategy, ecological network, Europe, fish, invertebrates, landscape ecology, mammals, Natura2000, plants ISSN 1566-7197 This report can be ordered by paying € 22,- to bank account number 36 70 54 612 by name of Alterra Wageningen, IBAN number NL 83 RABO 036 70 54 612, Swift number RABO2u nl.
    [Show full text]
  • Target Species - Species of European Concern
    Target Species - Species of European concern Commissioned by Sander van Opstal (Senior Policy Advisor Ecosystems and the Environment; Expertise Centre of the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food quality) Cover photo’s: Danube Crested Newt: B.I. Timofeev (© Pensoft Publishers), European Bison: G. Pohl, Isoplexis canariensis: J.H.J. Schaminée 2 Alterra-report 1119 Target species – Species of European concern A database driven selection of plant and animal species for the implementation of the Pan European Ecological Network Editors: W.A. Ozinga J.H.J. Schaminée Authors: W.A. Ozinga M. de Heer S.M. Hennekens A.J.F.M. van Opstal J.H.J. Schaminée H. Sierdsema N.A.C. Smits A.H.P. Stumpel Ch. van Swaay Alterra-report 1119 Alterra, Wageningen, 2005 ABSTRACT Ozinga, W.A. & Schaminée, J.H.J. (eds.). 2005. Target species – Species of European concern. A database driven selection of plant and animal species for the implementation of the Pan European Ecological Network. Wageningen, Alterra, Alterra-report 1119. 193 pages; 30 figs.; 18 tables; 134 refs. The concept of ecological networks is becoming increasingly important in both policies and practices of nature conservation throughout Europe. The establishment of the Pan Ecological European Network (PEEN) can be seen as one of the priority issues for nature conservation. For the establishment of such networks, it is essential to have adequate information on the threat status and distribution of plant and animal species throughout Europe. As there are thousands of plant and animal species, it is necessary to make a selection of species that are considered to be of specific conservation concern, so-called ‘target species’.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants and Climate Change in Europe
    Strasbourg, 2 September 2009 T-PVS/Inf (2009) 9 [Inf09e_2009.doc] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 29th meeting Bern, 23-26 November 2009 __________ THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON PLANT SPECIES IN EUROPE FINAL VERSION Report prepared by Professor Vernon Heywood School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading With contributions by Dr Alastair Culham This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Inf (2009) 9 - 2 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A summary is given of the current state of conservation of plant diversity in Europe and gaps in our baseline knowlege are identified. Published data on the recent effects on climate change on European plants are reviewed, including changes in phenology and altitudinal shifts. All the available evidence points to the high probability that plant diversity, both at the landscape and ecosystem level and at the species and population level will be severely impacted by climate change over the course of this century, interacting with other forms of global change such as population growth and movement and changes in disturbance regimes. The impacts will not be uniform, with some regions such as northern Europe experiencing moderate changes and turnover of species, while others, especially in the Mediterranean region and high mountain ranges may expect serious disruption of existing ecosystems and their replacement with novel assemblages of species and the loss of considerable numbers of currently rare and endangered species in specialized habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Updated Article 17 Checklists for Species and Habitats Expert Group on Reporting Under the Nature Directives
    EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Introduction to the updated Article 17 checklists for species and habitats Expert group on Reporting under the Nature Directives 15th March 2016 Introduction to the updated Article 17 checklists for species and habitats Introduction The present note is an introduction to the Art 17 checklists which will be made available to members of the Expert Group on Reporting after its March meeting. The note aims at explaining the different steps undertaken by ETC/BD to prepare a draft updated version of the Art 17 checklists for the 2013-2018 reporting cycle. It includes a summary of the principles retained to prepare the lists, taking into account the various comments received from Member States after the meeting of the Expert Group on Reporting in November 2015, as well as a number of taxonomic choices that were made. The note also indicates the type of feedback needed from members of the Expert Group on Reporting. I. From 2007-2012 to 2013-2018 checklists The proposed draft checklists for 2013-2018 reporting were prepared as follows: - Compilation of the checklist from the 2007-2012 reporting; - Addition of Annex I habitats and Annex II species for Croatia, based on information reported in the Natura 2000 database; - Integration of information on habitats and species from the delayed Greek Art 17 delivery; - Dealing with taxonomic issues with the aim to propose a more updated list of species names under which Member States should report; - Pre-assignment of category of occurrence to each habitat/species, using the typology presented in III).
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Vascular Plants of the Czech Republic - 2000
    Preslia, Praha, 72: 187- 230, 2000 187 Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic - 2000 Cerveny seznam cevnatych rostlin Ceske republiky (stav v roce 2000) t Josef H 0 1u b & Frantisek pro cha z k a I 1 Eko-Agency KOPR, Pivovarska 61, CZ-385 OJ Vzmperk, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected] Holub J. & Proch:izka F. (2000): Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic - 2000. - Prestia, Praha, 72: 187- 230. After more than 20 years since the publication of the first version of the list of extinct, endemic and endangered taxa of vascular plants of the Czech Republic, a new version is presented to the botani­ cal and nature conservation public. This version includes much new data on the flora of the Czech Republic which has been accumulated since 1979. A number of taxa are included which were not considered in the previous version (i. e. newly described species, and taxa known from other territo­ ries but only discovered in the Czech Republic in the last two decades). The threat classification of some taxa been has changed on the basis of much more detailed knowledge of their present distribution. Keywords: Red list, vascular plants, threatened plants, Czech Republic Introduction The first version of the list of extinct and endangered taxa of the Czech flora was published more than twenty years ago (Holub et al. 1979). Even at the time of its publication, the au­ thors knew that some facts would either change the status of some species included (e. g. lsoetes lacustris was erroneously included since the authors were not aware that its occur­ rence in the only locality had been confim1ed after more than 50 years - see Tomfovic 1979) or add other taxa to the list (e.
    [Show full text]
  • Regolamenti Tal-2009 Li Jemendaw Ir-Regolamenti Dwar Il-Protezzjoni Tal-Flora, Fawna U Ambjenti Naturali
    B 2221 Suppliment tal-Gazzetta tal-Gvern ta’ Malta Nru. 18,432, 2 ta’ Ġunju, 2009 Taqsima B ____________________________________________________________________ A.L. 162 tal-2009 ATT DWAR IL-ĦARSIEN TA’ L-AMBJENT (KAP. 435) ATT DWAR L-IPPJANAR TA’ L-IŻVILUPP (KAP. 356) Regolamenti tal-2009 li jemendaw ir-Regolamenti dwar il-Protezzjoni tal-Flora, Fawna u Ambjenti Naturali BIS-SAĦĦA tas-setgħat mogħtija bl-artikoli 9 u 11 tal-Att dwar il-Ħarsien tal-Ambjent, hawn aktar ‘il quddiem msejjaħ “l-Att”, u l-artikolu 60 tal-Att dwar l-Ippjanar ta’ l-Iżvilupp, il-Prim Ministru għamel ir-regolamenti li ġejjin:- 1. It-titolu ta’ dawn ir-regolamenti hu Regolamenti tal-2009 Titolu. li jemendaw ir-Regolamenti dwar il-Protezzjoni tal-Flora, Fawna u Ambjenti Naturali, u għandhom jinqraw u jinftehmu ħaġa waħda mar-Regolamenti tal-2006 dwar il-Protezzjoni tal-Flora, Fawna u A.L. 311 tal-2006. Ambjenti Naturali, hawn aktar ’il quddiem imsejħa “ir-regolamenti prinċipali”. 2. Dawn ir-regolamenti jimplimentaw il-provvedimenti Għan. tad-Direttiva tal-Kunsill 2006/105/KE b’adozzjoni tad-Direttivi 73/239/KEE, 74/557/KEE u 2002/83/KE fil-qasam ta’ l-ambjent, u dan minħabba fl-adeżjoni tal-Bulgarija u r-Rumanija ma’ l-Unjoni Ewropea fl-2007. 3. Minflok Skedi I, II, V u VII li jinsabu mar-regolamenti Jissostwixxu Skedi I, II, V u VII li jinsabu prinċipali għandhom jidħlu dawn l-iskedi li ġejjin:– mar-regolamenti prinċipali. B 2222 "Skeda I NATURAL HABITAT TYPES WHOSE CONSERVATION REQUIRES THE DESIGNATION OF SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION Interpretation - Guidance on the interpretation of habitat types is given in the ‘Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats’ published by the European Commission.
    [Show full text]