Fen Management Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fen Management Handbook The Fen Management Handbook Edited by Andrew McBride, Iain Diack, Nick Droy, Bobbie Hamill, Peter Jones, Johan Schutten, Ann Skinner and Margaret Street Contents 1. Introduction and Basic Principles 7 2. Fen Flora and Fauna 14 3. Understanding Fen Hydrology 39 4. Understanding Fen Nutrients 57 5. Fen Management and Restoration 76 6. Fen Vegetation Management 101 7. Fen Water Management 144 8. Managing Fen Nutrient Enrichment 171 9. Creating Fen Habitat 186 10. Monitoring to Inform Fen Management 212 11. Fens and People 240 12. Fens From an Economic Perspective 259 Appendix I Glossary 273 Appendix II List of Acronyms Used in the Handbook 275 Appendix III Common And Scientific Names of Species Referred to in Text 276 Appendix IV NVC Classifications for Fen Habitats 287 Appendix V Legal and Regulatory Requirements for Wetland Projects 296 Appendix VI Fen Management for Bryophytes 300 Appendix VII Fen Management for Vertebrates 303 Appendix VIII Fen Managment for Invertebrates 312 Appendix IX Further Reading 322 Index 330 5 1. Introduction and Basic Principles Fens are magical places; they are an essential part of our cherished landscape. They support a rich variety of wildlife, and are often a repository of evidence of many generations of past economic use and management. With so much in their favour, it is perhaps surprising that fens are one of the least well recognised habitats, and a part of our countryside which most people understand little about. This handbook has been produced to improve understanding of fens and how they function, to explain why fens need management and to provide best practice guidance. Case studies are included at the end of most sections as practical examples of the principles and techniques outlined in the text. The handbook is aimed at anyone interested in fens, or who might become involved in fen management, creation or restoration from a practical, policy or planning perspective. Key points and good practice are highlighted in green boxes. Cautions about activities which might be legislatively controlled or which might potentially damage the interest of fens are highlighted in red boxes. Snapshot case studies in the text to illustrate specific points are highlighted in yellow. 1.1 What are fens? The word ‘fen’ is derived from the old English word ‘fenn’ meaning marsh, dirt or mud. A fen is a wetland that receives water and nutrients from surface and/or groundwater, as well as from rainfall. Differentiating between fens and bogs Fens receive most of their water via rock and soil which contain dissolved minerals creating growing conditions that allow more lush vegetation than bogs. Bogs receive water exclusively from rainfall which is acidic and contains very few minerals; consequently rain-fed acid bogs support a less diverse range of vegetation than fens. Fens are found from sea level up into the hills, across the whole of the British Isles. They range in size from tiny flushes of only a few square metres, to extensive floodplain fens covering hundreds of hectares, forming important features in the wider landscape and river catchments. 7 Map showing an indicative distribution of lowland fens in the UK (JNCC) 1.2 What’s so special about fens? Fens were prized by our ancestors for the range of products they yield: reeds and sedge for thatching, willow for basketry, hay and lush aftermath grazing for cattle. It is the past management and human interaction with fens for such purposes that has created the extremely diverse and ever-changing habitat which attracts and supports a rich variety of plants, insects, mammals and birds, and which explains why fens are described as semi-natural rather than natural habitats. Section 2: Fen Flora and Fauna explains more about the flora and fauna which make fens so special from a wildlife perspective. The UK contains a large proportion of fen types found in Europe, the surviving fragments of previously much more extensive wetlands. In his book The Illustrated History of the Countryside, Oliver Rackham suggested that “about a quarter of the British Isles is, or has been some kind of wetland.” As in other parts of Europe, the quality and extent of wetlands including fens has declined dramatically as a result of drainage, development and neglect. Some of our best agricultural soils have been provided by fens, following drainage and decades of tillage. However, the organic component of the soil that makes it so suitable for root and other crops has gradually broken down releasing carbon and lowering the land level, making the land more difficult to drain. It is estimated that of 3400 km2 of fen present in England in 1637, only 10 km2 remains today. In intensively farmed lowland areas of England, fens now occur less frequently, are smaller in size and are more isolated than in other parts of the UK. Despite these losses, the UK still boasts some large fens such as the 300 ha Insh Marshes in the floodplain of the River Spey in Scotland, the calcareous rich-fen and swamp of Broadland covering 3,000 ha in Norfolk and Suffolk, and the Lough Erne system in Northern Ireland with extensive areas of fen and swamp. In some lowland areas, such as the Scottish Borders and southern parts of Northern Ireland, there are large numbers of fens which although small (many less than 3 ha in size), are still of European importance for the rich wildlife they support. 8 Estimates of the original coverage of fen are based on the extent of deep peat soils that consist of plant remains, formed under the fen. Surviving peat deposits show how the type of fen found at a particular location can change over time. Fens can also yield valuable palaeo-ecological evidence, such as pollen, artefacts such as tools, weapons and implements, or even human bodies. Some of the best preserved pre-historic archaeological remains have been recovered from fen sites such as Flag Fen in Cambridgeshire, Star Carr in Yorkshire and the Sweet Track at Shapwick Heath in Somerset. Such finds can help reconstruct aspects of the history of fens, and our ancestors. Further information on archaeology is found in Section 11. 1.3 Understanding fens Deciding how best to manage and create fens depends on understanding how fens work, how fens relate to the wider landscape, and how past management has influenced fens and the wildlife they support. Topography, hydrology and geology all play important roles in determining how a fen develops and is maintained. It is not only the geographical location of a fen which matters but also the type of rock and the way land is managed elsewhere in the catchment through which water feeding the fen has passed. The different types of fen are manifest in terms of the mix of plant species and how these interact with each other, to provide structural niches in which other wildlife such as dragonflies and birds can flourish. Fens can be classified in a variety of ways, including the height and/or type of dominant plant species, for example short sedge fens and tall reed fens, but the type and stature of vegetation is intrinsically linked to other environmental factors. Fens are therefore most commonly defined by their association with particular landscape features, and according to the source of water which feeds the fen. Section 3: Understanding Fen Hydrology explains more about fen hydrology and different types of fen. Section 4: Understanding Fen Nutrients explains about the different types and sources of nutrient critical to fens and how the nutrient status of individual fens can be assessed. 9 Floodplain landscape of the Biebrza River in north-east Poland. The naturally occurring diversity of wetland habitats including fens, wet grassland, reed- bed and scrub reflect constantly changing natural processes such as fluctuating water- levels (M. Street). 1.4 Fen management and restoration Wetland habitats, including fens, change with time. Without intervention, first reeds and then trees such as willow establish around the edge of open water. Silt carried by water flowing into the fen is trapped by the reeds, scrub and trees, and speeds up the transition to drier habitat. In the place of open water, open fen forms, which in turn becomes wet woodland. Fens may also transform into other habitats such as raised bog or dry woodland. These processes are referred to by ecologists as succession, or sometimes as hydroseral succession, to link the process specifically to the sequence of changes from open water. In addition once fen vegetation is established the dead and decaying plant material can form peat; this process known as paludification. In the past, harvesting and use of reeds and other fen products helped keep fens open but as traditional crafts and management practices have ceased, trees have gradually taken over many open fens, producing a different landscape with less diverse wildlife habitats. 10 Guiding principles for fen management, restoration and creation – Maintain or create ‘the right fen in the right place’. This means the most appropriate type for the geo-hydrological setting. – Aim for diversity, not uniformity. Resist the temptation to create the same type of fen everywhere just because it is easy to do so. – Take account of the surroundings and neighbouring habitats, such as lowland bog, wet grassland and wet woodland, in order to complete eco-hydrological units. – Consider the site within the context of the wider landscape. Many of today’s small fen sites and other wetlands are remnants of what were once much more extensive wetland systems. Section 5: Fen Management and Restoration outlines some of the common problems associated with managing fens and provides a framework for deciding when intervention may be necessary to maintain wildlife interest.
Recommended publications
  • Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies
    Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations & Policies Document, Wymondham Area Action Plan, Long Stratton Area Action Plan and Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan, undertaken for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Natural Environment Team HRA of Site Allocations Document, Wymondham AAP, Long Stratton AAP and Cringleford Neighbourhood Plan for South Norfolk Council October 2013 Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Site Specific Allocations and Policies Document, the Wymondham Area Action Plan, the Long Stratton Area Action Plan and the Cringleford Neighbourhood Development Plan Executive Summary As required by the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, before deciding to give consent or permission for a plan or project which is likely to have a significant effect on a European site, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects, the competent authority is required to make an appropriate assessment of the implications for that site in view of that site’s conservation objectives. This document is a record of the Habitats Regulation Assessment of the Sites Allocation Document, undertaken for South Norfolk Council. Additionally, proposed development at Wymondham, as described in the emerging Wymondham Area Action Plan, at Long Stratton, as described in the emerging Long Stratton Area Action Plan and proposed housing in the parish of Cringleford, guided by the emerging Cringleford Draft Neighbourhood Plan, are assessed Three groups of plans are reviewed with respect to their conclusions with respect to potential in-combination effects. These are plans for The Greater Norwich Development Partnership, Great Yarmouth Borough Council, Breckland District Council, and The Broads Authority including local development plans and the Tourism Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Improvement Plan Waveney and Little Ouse Valley Fens
    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Waveney and Little Ouse Valley Fens Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
    [Show full text]
  • David Tyldesley and Associates Planning, Landscape and Environmental Consultants
    DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document Durwyn Liley, Rachel Hoskin, John Underhill-Day & David Tyldesley 1 DRAFT Date: 7th November 2008 Version: Draft Recommended Citation: Liley, D., Hoskin, R., Underhill-Day, J. & Tyldesley, D. (2008). Habitat Regulations Assessment: Breckland Council Submission Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Document. Footprint Ecology, Wareham, Dorset. Report for Breckland District Council. 2 Summary This document records the results of a Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) of Breckland District Council’s Core Strategy. The Breckland District lies in an area of considerable importance for nature conservation with a number of European Sites located within and just outside the District. The range of sites, habitats and designations is complex. Taking an area of search of 20km around the District boundary as an initial screening for relevant protected sites the assessment identified five different SPAs, ten different SACs and eight different Ramsar sites. Following on from this initial screening the assessment identifies the following potential adverse effects which are addressed within the appropriate assessment: • Reduction in the density of Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark) near to new housing. • Increased levels of recreational activity resulting in increased disturbance to Breckland SPA Annex I bird species (stone curlew, nightjar, woodlark). • Increased levels of people on and around the heaths, resulting in an increase in urban effects such as increased fire risk, fly-tipping, trampling. • Increased levels of recreation to the Norfolk Coast (including the Wash), potentially resulting in disturbance to interest features and other recreational impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • (Restriction on Use of Lead Shot) (England) Regulations 1999
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1999 No. 2170 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ENGLAND The Environmental Protection (Restriction on Use of Lead Shot) (England) Regulations 1999 Made ---- 29th July 1999 Laid before Parliament 3rd August 1999 Coming into force 1st September 1999 The Secretary of State– having consulted the committee established(a) under section 140(5) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990(b); having published a notice in the London Gazette as required by section 140(6)(b) of that Act; having considered the representations made to him in accordance with that notice; considering it appropriate to make these Regulations for the purpose of preventing the substance or articles specified in them from causing pollution of the environment and harm to the health of animals; in exercise of the powers conferred on him by section 140(c) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Regulations: Citation, commencement and extent 1.—(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Environmental Protection (Restriction on Use of Lead Shot) (England) Regulations 1999 and shall come into force on 1st September 1999. (2) These Regulations shall extend to England only. Interpretation 2. In these Regulations– “authorised person” means a person authorised under regulation 4(1) below; “lead shot” means any shot made of– (a) lead, or (b) any alloy or compound of lead where lead comprises more than 1% of that alloy or compound; “premises” includes any land, vehicle or vessel, but does not include premises used for residential purposes; “shot gun” means a smooth-bore gun but does not include any shot gun chambered for 9 millimetre or smaller rim-fire cartridges; (a) S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Ecological Restoration: Restoration in Practice, Volume 2 Edited by Martin R
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-04775-3 - Handbook of Ecological Restoration: Restoration in Practice, Volume 2 Edited by Martin R. Perrow and Anthony J. Davy Index More information Index Page numbers in italics refer to information in a box, figure or table abalone (Haliotis rufescens)124 and heavy metals 95 Ammophila arenaria 209, 216, 218 Abandoned Mine Land (AML) and landscapes 32--33, 46, 47, 61--65, Amoco Cadiz oil spill 255 programme 18 113, 401, 402--403, 421 Amorpha nana 10 Abramis spp. 298, 299, 300, 314 livestock (see cattle; grazing; ancient woodlands 504, 505, 506, 521 Acacia spp. 71, 488, 489 pastoralism; sheep) see also old growth Acanthaster plancii 173, 176 organic 45, 53 Angola 60 Accipiter gentilis 505 pastoral (see pastoralism) ants 565, 568, 572 Acer spp. 7, 10 on reclaimed land 94, 94--95 Apis mellifera 574 acid rain 36, 341, 342 reclaiming land from 338, 340, Apteryx spp. 100 acidification/acid rain 36, 341, 342, 383, 406--407, 411--412, 541--543 Aqaba, Gulf of 186 406 and reedbeds 41 aquaculture 243 saltmarshes 246, 247, 255 subsidies, EU 46--50 Araucaria heterophylla 100 wetlands, freshwater 341--342, 343 sustainable 47, 477--478 arctic, oil development 6, 356--357, see also soils and tropical forests 540, 559 361--364 Acropora spp. 177, 178, 179, 180, 186 and water 45, 48 arctic ecosystems 355--358 acrotelm 331, 336 see also grazing arctic hare (Lepus arcticus)6 Action Plan for the Human agro-forestry systems 471, 479, 541, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 6, 357 Environment 101 545 Arctophila fulva 362 active/passive
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Biodiversity Partnership Newsletter Autumn/Winter 2015
    Suffolk Biodiversity Partnership Newsletter Autumn/Winter 2015 In this issue: Partners News Page No. Fen Raft Spiders return to Suffolk 2 In Breckland with GeoSuffolk 4 RSPB Big Schools Birdwatch 5 Suffolk Biological Recording Bursary—FSC Flatford Mill 6 Suffolk Naturalists’ Society Conference 6 East Suffolk Catchment Partnership 7 European Turtle Dove joins list of species facing global extinction 8 Enhancing habitats in the River Waveney between Scole and Billingsford 9 Introducing Felxistowe’s Community Nature Reserve 10 Partnership working to enhance the River Stour at Great Bradley 12 SBRC Recording Online - Invasive Non-native Species 14 Wildlife Recorders of Tomorrow 15 Hanging Hill Orchard, Rattlesden 16 Seawall Biodiversity Handbook 16 Beachwatch and the Great British Beach Clean 16 Ipswich Wildlife Network 18 Suffolk Biodiversity Partnership News 19 About SBP 23 Amazing birds! To find out more about Swifts (a Suffolk Character Species), see Edward Mayer’s presentation at the Biodiversity and Planning Conference on behalf of Swift Conservation (p. 19) Superbly skilful flyers, Swifts drink, feed and mate in flight and they eat countless harmful insects too 1 Fen Raft Spiders return to Suffolk Helen Smith, Little Ouse Headwaters Project The first discovery of the Fen Raft spider Dolomedes plantarius in Britain was made in Suffolk in 1956. Dr Eric Duffey famously found this big and beautiful species on Redgrave Fen, the Suffolk fringe of what is now Redgrave and Lopham Fen NNR which straddles the county boundary at the source of the Waveney. Unlike the majority of the boldly striped individuals, the one he spotted belonged, fortuitously, to the less frequent, unstriped morph, alerting him to the likelihood that it was not the raft spider species then known in Britain, Dolomedes fimbriatus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the Modelling of the Dispersion and Deposition of Ammonia from the Proposed Broiler Chicken Rearing Houses on Land S
    A Report on the Modelling of the Dispersion and Deposition of Ammonia from the Proposed Broiler Chicken Rearing Houses on land south of the A1066, Diss Road, near to Garboldisham, Thetford, Norfolk Prepared by Sally Howse AS Modelling & Data Ltd. Email: [email protected] Telephone: 01952 462500 11th September 2020 1 1. Introduction AS Modelling & Data Ltd. has been instructed by Ian Pick of Ian Pick Associates Ltd., on behalf of B.J. and P.M. Gooderham, to use computer modelling to assess the impact of ammonia emissions from the proposed broiler chicken rearing houses on land south of the A1066, Diss Road near to Garboldisham, Thetford, in Norfolk. IP22 2HW. Ammonia emission rates from the proposed poultry houses have been assessed and quantified based upon the Environment Agency’s standard ammonia emission factors. The ammonia emission rates have then been used as inputs to an atmospheric dispersion and deposition model which calculates ammonia exposure levels and nitrogen and acid deposition rates in the surrounding area. This report is arranged in the following manner: • Section 2 provides relevant details of the farm and potentially sensitive receptors in the area. • Section 3 provides some general information on ammonia; details of the method used to estimate ammonia emissions, relevant guidelines and legislation on exposure limits and where relevant, details of likely background levels of ammonia. • Section 4 provides some information about ADMS, the dispersion model used for this study and details the modelling procedure. • Section 5 contains the results of the modelling. • Section 6 provides a discussion of the results and conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • SBRC Heathland Suffolk State of Nature
    Suffolk State of Nature Heathland S.B.R.C. Suffolk State of Nature Heathland 1 Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2 PART 1: Heathlands 2. Definition of heathland ......................................................................................... 3 3. The Suffolk BAP targets for heathland ................................................................ 4 Definition of terms – maintain, restore, (re)create. 4. The present extent of heathland, and past losses ............................................... 5 Present extent Historical losses – Brecks & Sandlings Parcel size & fragmentation Designation Relationship with other habitats Threats 5. Restoration and re-creation ............................................................................... 14 Present figures on condition of heathland Known restoration and creation projects Lack of reporting / monitoring systems Mapping projects to target creation (Lifescapes & EEHOMP) 6. Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 20 Mapping / monitoring extent Monitoring quality of heathlands (incl species) Monitoring restoration and creation projects / extent BARS 7. Assessment of BAP progress ............................................................................ 22 Summary of key data PART 2: Heathland BAP Species BAP Species associated with Heathland Adder ........................................ Vipera berus ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society
    Tht r^ATUHAL STORY MUSEUM TRANSACTIO -3 DEC 1999 5xt:ha5«i>:o OF OeNCRAL THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS' SOCIETY Vol. 32 Part 1 (August 1999) TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK AND NORWICH NATURALISTS' SOCIETY ISSN 0375 7226 Volume 32 Part 1 (August 1999) Editor P.W.Lambley OFFICERS OF THE SOCIETY 1999-2000 Presidents: Mrs Gillian Beckett & A. L. Bull Vice-Presidents: Dr R.Baker, P.R.Banham, A. L. Bull, K.B. Clarke, E.T.Daniels, D.A.Dorling, K.C.Durrant. R E. Evans, R.C. Haney, R.Jones, Mrs J. Robinson. M.J.Seago. Chairman: D.L. Pauli, 8, Lindford Drive, Eaton, Norwich NR4 6LT. Secretary : Dr A.R.Leach, 3, Eccles Rd, Holt, NR25 6HJ Assistant Secretary: J.F.Butchcr, 4, Hillvuc Close, New Costessey NR5 ONQ Treasurer: D.l. Richmond, 42, Richmond Rise, Reepham, NRIO 4LS Membership Committee: Mrs A.Brcwster (Chairman), S.M. Livermore, (Secretary) 6, Terence Avc, Sprowston, Norwich NR7 8EH Programme Committee:R.W. Ellis (Chairman), Dr S.R.Martin (Secretary) Publications Committee:Dr R.Baker (Chairman), P.W.Lambley, Dr M.Perrow, M.J.Seago, (Editors) Research Committee:R.W. Maidstone (Chainnan),Dr l.F.Keymer (Secretaiy) Hon. Auditor: Mrs S. Pearson Wildlife 2000 Committee: R Haney (Chairman), S. Livermore (Secretary ) Elected Members of Council:,, G.M.Coupland, Mrs J.Negal, C.W.Penny, Miss E M Phipps, A C. Brown, G.E.Dunmore, A. L. Howes, D.Nobbs, Mrs C.W. Haines, S.Harrap, D.B.MacFarlane, M.H.Poulton, Ms A Starling. WILDLIFE 2000 1 During its 125th anniversary celebrations, the Norfolk and Norwich 'Naturalists' Society announced its intention to document the wildlife of Norfolk Ifor the start of the new millennium in a project called Wildlife 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpublished Report to Natural England, Peterborough Smith, H
    Fen Raft Spider Recovery Project: 2013 Summary Report for Redgrave and Lopham Fen Dr Helen Smith [email protected] February 2013 Contents Fen Raft Spider Recovery Project: 2013 Summary Report for Redgrave and Lopham Fen Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 Methods 4 2.1 Annual census .................................................................................................................................... 4 Fig. 1 The Little Fen census area showing ponds included in the census. Shading shows areas where vegetation was cut and removed in July/August each year ..................................................................... 5 2.2 Analyses of annual census data ........................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Breeding indicators............................................................................................................................. 6 2.4 Water levels ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3 Results 7 3.1 Distribution .......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Abundance ......................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Breeding indicators..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report Sustainability Appraisal (SA) for the West Suffolk Local Plan 2019-08-15
    Sustainability Appraisal (SA) for the West Suffolk Local Plan Scoping Report Update West Suffolk District Council February 2020 Sustainability Appraisal (SA) for the West Scoping Report Update Suffolk Local Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Cheryl Beattie Cheryl Beattie Mark Fessey Mark Fessey Senior Environmental Senior Environmental Associate Director Associate Director Planner Planner Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position V1 06 Feb 2020 First draft for 06 Feb 2020 Cheryl Beattie Senior client review Environmental Planner V2 18 Feb 2020 Final draft 18 Feb 2020 Cheryl Beattie Senior Environmental Planner Prepared for: West Suffolk District Council Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Aldgate Tower 2 Leman Street London E1 8FA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: West Suffolk District Council AECOM Sustainability Appraisal (SA) for the West
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation Training Course Broads 2002
    Documentation of the Training Course WETLANDS FOR LIFE A Training Course in Wetland Management and Restoration Norwich, Great Britain 30 September - 5 October 2002 With the contribution of the LIFE financial instrument of the European Community Content 1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................3 2 Presentations..................................................................................................................3 2.1 Welcome and Introduction to the Trainings course: A National Park - Dr John Packman, Broads Authority ............................................................................................3 2.2 Introduction to the Broads - Andrea Kelly, Broads Authority ..........................................7 2.3 Understanding the hydrology of wetlands - Dr Kevin Hiscock, University of East Anglia............................................................................................................................10 2.4 Water quality and its restoration ...................................................................................14 2.4.1 Cleaning up after nutrient enrichment - Rory Sanderson, Environment Agency ..........14 2.4.2 Biomanipulation and the way forward - Andrea Kelly, Broads Authority.......................19 2.5 Fen and drained marshes: their management and restoration.....................................22 2.5.1 History of fens and their management - Rob Andrews, Broads Authority ....................22 2.5.2
    [Show full text]