National Classification? 13
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Disability Classification System
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY Track & Field (NB: also used for Cross Country where applicable) Current Previous Definition Classification Classification Deaf (Track & Field Events) T/F 01 HI 55db loss on the average at 500, 1000 and 2000Hz in the better Equivalent to Au2 ear Visually Impaired T/F 11 B1 From no light perception at all in either eye, up to and including the ability to perceive light; inability to recognise objects or contours in any direction and at any distance. T/F 12 B2 Ability to recognise objects up to a distance of 2 metres ie below 2/60 and/or visual field of less than five (5) degrees. T/F13 B3 Can recognise contours between 2 and 6 metres away ie 2/60- 6/60 and visual field of more than five (5) degrees and less than twenty (20) degrees. Intellectually Disabled T/F 20 ID Intellectually disabled. The athlete’s intellectual functioning is 75 or below. Limitations in two or more of the following adaptive skill areas; communication, self-care; home living, social skills, community use, self direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure and work. They must have acquired their condition before age 18. Cerebral Palsy C2 Upper Severe to moderate quadriplegia. Upper extremity events are Wheelchair performed by pushing the wheelchair with one or two arms and the wheelchair propulsion is restricted due to poor control. Upper extremity athletes have limited control of movements, but are able to produce some semblance of throwing motion. T/F 33 C3 Wheelchair Moderate quadriplegia. Fair functional strength and moderate problems in upper extremities and torso. -
Fish-Stream Identification Guidebook
of BRITISH COLUMBIA Fish-stream Identification Guidebook Second edition Version 2.1 August 1998 BC Environment Fish-stream Identification Guidebook of BRITISH COLUMBIA Fish-stream Identification Guidebook Second edition Version 2.1 August 1998 Authority Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act Operational Planning Regulation Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Fish-stream identification guidebook. – 2nd ed. (Forest practices code of British Columbia) ISBN 0-7726-3664-8 1. Fishes – Habitat – British Columbia. 2. River surveys – British Columbia. 3. Forest management – British Columbia. 4. Riparian forests – British Columbia – Management. I. British Columbia. Ministry of Forests. SH177.L63F58 1998 634.9 C98-960250-8 Fish-stream Identification Guidebook Preface This guidebook has been prepared to help forest resource managers plan, prescribe and implement sound forest practices that comply with the Forest Practices Code. Guidebooks are one of the four components of the Forest Practices Code. The others are the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, the regulations, and the standards. The Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act is the legislative umbrella authorizing the Code’s other components. It enables the Code, establishes mandatory requirements for planning and forest practices, sets enforcement and penalty provisions, and specifies administrative arrangements. The regulations lay out the forest practices that apply province-wide. The chief forester may establish standards, where required, to expand on a regulation. Both regulations and standards are mandatory requirements under the Code. Forest Practices Code guidebooks have been developed to support the regulations, however, only those portions of guidebooks cited in regulation are part of the legislation. -
Cycling Australia Annual Report
2 CYCLING AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT 2020 CONTENTS Sponsors and Partners 4 - 5 Board/Executive Team 6 Sport Australia Message 7 Strategic Overview 8 One Sport 9 Chair’s Report 10 - 11 CEO's Message 12 - 13 Australian Cycling Team 14 - 25 Commonwealth Games Australia Report 26 - 27 Sport 28 - 29 Participation 30 - 33 AUSTRALIA CYCLING Membership 34 - 37 Media and Communications 38 - 39 Corporate Governance 40 - 41 Anti-doping 42 - 43 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 REPORT ANNUAL Technical Commission 44 - 45 Financial Report 46 - 70 State Associations 72 - 89 Cycling ACT 72 - 73 Cycling NSW 74 - 75 Cycling NT 76 - 77 Cycling QLD 78 - 79 Cycling SA 80 - 81 Cycling TAS 82 - 85 Cycling VIC 86 - 87 WestCycle 88 - 89 World Results 90 - 97 Australian Results 98 - 113 Team Listings 114 - 115 Office Bearers and Staff 116 - 119 Honour Roll 120 - 122 Award Winners 123 PHOTOGRAPHY CREDITS: Craig Dutton, Casey Gibson, Con Chronis, ASO, John Veage, UCI, Steve Spencer, Commonwealth Games Australia, Adobe Stock 3 PROUDLY SUPPORTED BY PRINCIPAL PARTNERS SPORT PARTNERS ANNUAL REPORT 2020 REPORT ANNUAL MAJOR PARTNERS CYCLING AUSTRALIA CYCLING BROADCAST PARTNERS 4 PROUDLY SUPPORTED BY EVENT PARTNERS CYCLING AUSTRALIA CYCLING ANNUAL REPORT 2020 REPORT ANNUAL SUPPORTERS Cycling Australia acknowledges Juilliard Group for support in the provision of the CA Melbourne Office 5 BOARD AND EXECUTIVE TEAM AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2020 CYCLING AUSTRALIA BOARD DUNCAN MURRAY STEVE DRAKE LINDA EVANS Chair Managing Director Director ANNUAL REPORT 2020 REPORT ANNUAL ANNE GRIPPER GLEN PEARSALL PENNY SHIELD Director Director Director EXECUTIVE TEAM CYCLING AUSTRALIA CYCLING STEVE DRAKE JOHN MCDONOUGH KIPP KAUFMANN Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer General Manager and Company Secretary Sport SIMON JONES NICOLE ADAMSON Performance Director, General Manager Australian Cycling Team Participation and Member Services 6 Message from Sport Australia The start of 2020 has been an extraordinarily tough time for Australians, including all of us committed to sport. -
2016 06 Candidate PDF.Indd
I voted. Have you? 2016 IPC Athletes’ Council elections The candidates #ProudParalympian Who is the IPC Athletes’ Council? The IPC Athletes’ Council is the collective voice of Paralympic athletes within the IPC and the greater Paralympic Movement. As the liaison between IPC decision-makers and Paralympic athletes, the IPC Athletes’ Council works to provide effective input into decision-making at all levels of the organisa- tion. To this end, the IPC Athletes’ Council works to ensure effective athlete representation on all IPC committees and commissions as well as to create other opportunities for athlete representation both within and outside the IPC. For example, the IPC Athletes’ Council enjoys cross representation with the IOC Athletes’ Commission. 2016 IPC Athletes’ Council elections Elections for the six summer sport representatives on the Athletes’ Council will take place between 5 and 16 September, in the #ProudParalympian space of the Athletes’ Dining Hall in the Paralympic Village. All “Aa” accredited athletes are entitled to vote. Athletes must vote for six candidates (not more not less). The IPC Electoral Commission is composed of the following individuals: ▪ Linda Mastandrea (IPC Legal and Ethics Committee Chairperson) – Electoral Commission Chairperson ▪ Mark Copeland (IPC Legal and Ethics Committee Member) ▪ Martin Mansell (former Chairperson IPC Athletes’ Council) To cast your vote, you simply need to: 1. Show your accreditation card at the voting station. Your card will be checked in the Voting Registration System and it will be checked that you are eligible to vote. 2. In the voting booth, follow the instructions of the electronic voting system. Please note that athletes who require assistance may select an assistant of their choice to complete the voting process. -
Synoptic-Scale Control Over Modern Rainfall and Flood Patterns in the Levant Drylands with Implications for Past Climates
JUNE 2018 ARMONETAL. 1077 Synoptic-Scale Control over Modern Rainfall and Flood Patterns in the Levant Drylands with Implications for Past Climates MOSHE ARMON Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel ELAD DENTE Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, and Geological Survey of Israel, Jerusalem, Israel JAMES A. SMITH Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey YEHOUDA ENZEL AND EFRAT MORIN Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel (Manuscript received 23 January 2018, in final form 1 May 2018) ABSTRACT Rainfall in the Levant drylands is scarce but can potentially generate high-magnitude flash floods. Rainstorms are caused by distinct synoptic-scale circulation patterns: Mediterranean cyclone (MC), active Red Sea trough (ARST), and subtropical jet stream (STJ) disturbances, also termed tropical plumes (TPs). The unique spatiotemporal char- acteristics of rainstorms and floods for each circulation pattern were identified. Meteorological reanalyses, quantitative precipitation estimates from weather radars, hydrological data, and indicators of geomorphic changes from remote sensing imagery were used to characterize the chain of hydrometeorological processes leading to distinct flood patterns in the region. Significant differences in the hydrometeorology of these three flood-producing synoptic systems were identified: MC storms draw moisture from the Mediterranean and generate moderate rainfall in the northern part of the region. ARST and TP storms transfer large amounts of moisture from the south, which is converted to rainfall in the hyperarid southernmost parts of the Levant. -
The Use of Next Generation Sequencing to Study the Environmental Mycobiome and Its Potential Health Effects
The use of next generation sequencing to study the environmental mycobiome and its potential health effects Emma Marczylo Bioaerosols – June 2017 Overview • Brief Background: • Why are CRCE interested in fungal bioaerosols? • Mycobiome analysis: • Why use next generation sequencing? • Ongoing work • What is the current focus of CRCE’s bioaerosol research? 2 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Why bioaerosols? • Respiratory health/toxicology a big focus within our department & bioaerosols represent a current respiratory health concern 3 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Why bioaerosols? • Common sources relevant to public health 4 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Why bioaerosols? • Public concern over health effects of living near composting and intensive farming sites • Systematic reviews on exposures and health outcomes related to bioaerosol emissions from composting facilities (published 2015*) or intensive farming (ongoing) in collaboration with SAHSU • Evidence on both exposure assessment and health effects are limited • A big unknown is the microbial composition of such bioaerosols *Pearson et al, 2015, J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev,18:43-69 5 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Why fungi? Normally die rapidly due to water evaporation, although increased humidity and clumping can prolong survival • Can remain viable for much longer periods, even at low humidity & high/low temperatures • Much less known about the fungal composition of bioaerosols (and other samples) • Fungi linked with development and exacerbation of asthma symptoms 6 Bioaerosols – June 2017 Mycobiome -
Framework for In-Field Analyses of Performance and Sub-Technique Selection in Standing Para Cross-Country Skiers
sensors Article Framework for In-Field Analyses of Performance and Sub-Technique Selection in Standing Para Cross-Country Skiers Camilla H. Carlsen 1,*, Julia Kathrin Baumgart 1, Jan Kocbach 1,2, Pål Haugnes 1 , Evy M. B. Paulussen 1,3 and Øyvind Sandbakk 1 1 Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] (J.K.B.); [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (E.M.B.P.); [email protected] (Ø.S.) 2 NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, 5008 Bergen, Norway 3 Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-452-40-788 Abstract: Our aims were to evaluate the feasibility of a framework based on micro-sensor technology for in-field analyses of performance and sub-technique selection in Para cross-country (XC) skiing by using it to compare these parameters between elite standing Para (two men; one woman) and able- bodied (AB) (three men; four women) XC skiers during a classical skiing race. The data from a global navigation satellite system and inertial measurement unit were integrated to compare time loss and selected sub-techniques as a function of speed. Compared to male/female AB skiers, male/female Para skiers displayed 19/14% slower average speed with the largest time loss (65 ± 36/35 ± 6 s/lap) Citation: Carlsen, C.H.; Kathrin found in uphill terrain. -
Badminton Australia Anti Doping Policy Adopted 2020
BADMINTON AUSTRALIA ANTI-DOPING POLICY INTERPRETATION This Anti-Doping Policy as amended takes effect on 10 August 2020. In this Anti-Doping Policy, references to Sporting Administration Body should be read as references to Badminton Australia. Badminton Australia’s international federation is the Badminton World Federation (BWF) 1. WARNING TO ATHLETES AND ATHLETE SUPPORT PERSONNEL ▪ You are responsible for knowing what the anti-doping rule violations are. ▪ You must find out which substances and methods are prohibited. ▪ Ignorance is no excuse. ▪ You must be aware of the rules in this Anti-Doping Policy. ▪ This Anti-Doping Policy adopts the strict liability principle. ▪ Athletes are responsible for anything found in their system. ▪ You must be aware of the sanctions that could be applied to you in this Anti-Doping Policy. 1 Defined terms are in italics and capitalised. Other words will have either the definition provided for by the WADA Code, or if they are not defined they will have their plain English meaning. CONTENTS BADMINTON AUSTRALIA ANTI-DOPING POLICY .................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE 1 APPLICATION OF ANTI-DOPING POLICY ......................................................................... 1 1.1 Application of the anti-doping policy ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Application to the sporting administration body .................................................................. 1 1.3 Application to Persons -
Field Indicators of Hydric Soils
United States Department of Field Indicators of Agriculture Natural Resources Hydric Soils in the Conservation Service United States In cooperation with A Guide for Identifying and Delineating the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Hydric Soils, Version 8.2, 2018 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils Version 8.2, 2018 (Including revisions to versions 8.0 and 8.1) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Edited by L.M. Vasilas, Soil Scientist, NRCS, Washington, DC; G.W. Hurt, Soil Scientist, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and J.F. Berkowitz, Soil Scientist, USACE, Vicksburg, MS ii In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. -
Annual Report 2019 Contents
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS PAGE PRESIDENT'S REVIEW 8 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT 12 AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE 20 OLYMPISM IN THE COMMUNITY 26 OLYMPIAN SERVICES 38 TEAMS 46 ATHLETE AND NATIONAL FEDERATION FUNDING 56 FUNDING THE AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC MOVEMENT 60 AUSTRALIA’S OLYMPIC PARTNERS 62 AUSTRALIA’S OLYMPIC HISTORY 66 CULTURE AND GOVERNANCE 76 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 88 AOF 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 119 CHAIR'S REVIEW 121 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 128 Australian Olympic Committee Incorporated ABN 33 052 258 241 REG No. A0004778J Level 4, Museum of Contemporary Art 140 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 P: +61 2 9247 2000 @AUSOlympicTeam olympics.com.au Photos used in this report are courtesy of Australian Olympic Team Supplier Getty Images. 3 OUR ROLE PROVIDE ATHLETES THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXCEL AT THE OLYMPIC GAMES AND PROMOTE THE VALUES OF OLYMPISM AND BENEFITS OF PARTICIPATION IN SPORT TO ALL AUSTRALIANS. 4 5 HIGHLIGHTS REGIONAL GAMES PARTNERSHIPS OLYMPISM IN THE COMMUNITY PACIFIC GAMES ANOC WORLD BEACH GAMES APIA, SAMOA DOHA, QATAR 7 - 20 JULY 2019 12 - 16 OCTOBER 2019 31PARTNERS 450 SUBMISSIONS 792 COMPLETED VISITS 1,022 11SUPPLIERS STUDENT LEADERS QLD 115,244 FROM EVERY STATE STUDENTS VISITED AND TERRITORY SA NSW ATHLETES55 SPORTS6 ATHLETES40 SPORTS7 ACT 1,016 26 SCHOOL SELECTED TO ATTEND REGISTRATIONS 33 9 14 1 4LICENSEES THE NATIONAL SUMMIT DIGITAL OLYMPIAN SERVICES ATHLETE CONTENT SERIES 70% 11,160 FROM FOLLOWERS Athlete-led content captured 2018 at processing sessions around 166% #OlympicTakeOver #GiveThatAGold 3,200 Australia, in content series to be 463,975 FROM OLYMPIANS published as part of selection IMPRESSIONS 2018 Campaign to promote Olympic CONTACTED announcements. -
Editorial Style from a to Z April 2012
Contents A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z London 2012 Editorial style from A to Z April 2012 The aim of this editorial style guide is to If you are giving this guide to anyone Introduction help everyone write about London 2012 externally, please inform LOCOG’s with clarity and consistency. The guide Editorial Services team or the ODA’s includes practical information to ensure Marketing team so we can let them writers prepare accurate content in the know when it is reissued. If you have most suitable style. any queries that are not covered by the guide, please let us know so we The guide is arranged alphabetically for can include them in future editions. ease of use, with simple navigational tools to help you find what you’re looking Working together, we will develop for. Clicking on the letters across the top effective and accessible content that of every page will take you to the first will help make London 2012 an page of each section. In addition, each incredible experience for all audiences. entry on the contents page is a link, and there are cross-references with links to other sections throughout the guide. As our organisation develops, so our style guide needs to be flexible and adaptable. For this reason, we will be regularly updating this document. Please ensure that you have the latest version. This document and the official Emblems of the London 2012 Games are © London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Limited 2007–2012. -
Classification of Disabled Athletes: (Dis)Empowering the Paralympic
The Tail is Wagging the Dog: Body Culture, Classification and the Paralympic Movement For consideration for the special issue of Ethnography on physical culture Submitted by Dr. P. David Howe Academic Associate Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport Lecturer in the Sociology of Sport School of Sport and Exercise Sciences Loughborough University Loughborough UK LE11 3TU http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/sses/contact/staff/pdh.html ph. +44 (0)1509 226389 fax. +44 (0)1509 226301 [email protected] 1 Abstract. The rules and regulations regarding the classification process through which athletes must be vetted to determine eligibility for Paralympic competition have been transformed drastically over the last two decades. A complex classification system initially developed by the International Organizations of Sport for the Disabled (IOSD) has been the distinctive feature of the Paralympic movement over this period. Key consideration must be given to the equitable nature of any classification system imposed by the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) in order to comply with the ideology of Paralympism. Paralympism is manifest in the dictum of the Paralympic movement ‘empower, inspire and achieve’. Using ethnographic data obtained while a Paralympic athlete this paper explores recent debates within the sport of athletics surrounding classification. This is achieved by highlighting the process of classification and how as a result of this process some bodies are celebrated and others are not within a sporting culture established as a ghetto for imperfection. KEY WORDS: Paralympism, ethics, classification, athletics, habitus This paper highlights the importance of body culture in the transforming of the Paralympic movement by examining data collected ethnographically by an anthropologist who was both athlete and administrator within elite sporting practice for the disabled1.