DOCSLIB.ORG

Sacred Cacti 3Rd Edition Table of Contents Lophophora Sp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sacred Cacti 3Rd Edition Table of Contents Lophophora Sp A preview excerpted from the unpublished Sacred Cacti 3rd edition Table of contents Lophophora sp. var. Vieska Abbreviations 122 11 Some forms not widely accepted as specific IMPORTANT Disclaimer & Cautionary designations Statement to Readers 123 13 Lophophora fricii Habermann Opening comments 123 19 Lophophora jourdaniana Habermann Endnotes for Opening comments 124 29 Lophophora williamsii var. caespitosa Hort. Chapter One 125 33 Lophophora lutea Random thoughts from a variety of minds 127 56 “Other” peyote species Notes for Chapter One 127 61 Lophophora williamsii (Lemaire ex Salm- A Few Similarities between the Drug Wars Dyck) Coulter and the Witch Craze (after Szasz) 129 78 Common names used for or names applied to Chapter Two peyote 81 129 The Peyote ‘crisis’ Other names encountered in connection with 81 Peyote Some statistics from the Texas DPS 132 82 Folk uses of Lophophora williamsii Some suggestions 133 88 Occurrence and distribution Chapter Three 133 93 Flora often associated with peyote The Distribution & Occurrence of Mesca- 135 line Description and characteristics 95 136 The reported distribution of mescaline Moisture content of Peyote containing species within the family 139 Cactaceae Reported analysis of L. williamsii: 96 140 Distribution of alkaloids within cacti Mescaline content of Peyote 98 140 Traces, Questions or Errors Alkaloid content of Peyote 100 141 Aztekium ritteri (Bödeker) Bödeker An Abbreviated Chronology of the Identifi- 101 cation of the Peyote alkaloids The Gymnocalycium species 144 102 Effects of peyote summarized Reports of the occurrences of mescaline 146 within the Gymnocalycium species Pharmacological overview of the non-mesca- 108 line alkaloid content of peyote Islaya minor Backeberg 146 117 Alkaloids identified in peyote Lophophora diffusa (Croizat) H. Bravo 148 118 5 Sacred Cacti 3rd ed. A couple points of potential interest Descriptions of Delospermas mentioned in 154 positive assays References on peyote that may be of 209 potential interest to readers Cultivation of the Delosperma species 158 212 Peyote Music Delosperma species in which we have de- 161 tected the tentative presence of DMT A portion of the first Inquisition Law and/or 5-MeO-DMT against Mescaline Containing Plants 214 (Peyote) Other members of the Aizoaceae 162 216 the genus Opuntia Summary of other Aizoaceous TLC alkaloid 163 screening Pelecyphora aselliformis Ehrenberg 216 171 Some Other Succulents Held to be Sa- Pereskia Mill. cred, Medicinal or Useful 172 217 Pereskiopsis Britton & Rose Miscellaneous Notes on other members of 177 the Aizoaceae Polaskia chende (Gosselin) Gibson & Horak 221 177 Miscellaneous Notes on some additional Pterocereus (?) gaumeri (Britton & Rose) Aizoaceous Chemistry MacDougall & Miranda 222 179 Endnotes for Some other Succulents Stenocereus beneckei (Ehrenberg) 226 Buxbaum Chapter Five 180 231 re: Djerassi reporting the detection of no Mescaline; Physical Data & Toxicity alkaloid 233 182 Free base Stenocereus stellatus (Pfeiffer) Riccobono 233 183 LD50 Stenocereus treleasei (Britton & Rose) 234 Backeberg Mescaline hydrochloride 184 235 Stetsonia coryne (Salm-Dyck) Britton & Mescaline sulfate Rose 237 185 Mescaline’s action The Turbinicarpus species 238 187 Dosage Comments on the occurrence & distribution 239 of mescaline Isolation 194 239 Chapter Four Synthesis 203 239 Some Other Succulents Spectrofluorometry 203 241 Some Other Succulents Mass Spectra 204 242 Notes on the AIZOACEAE Biosynthesis of mescaline (discussions, 205 studies and route proposals) 242 6 SC3: Table of Contents Assays Suggested readings on psychological and 242 psychiatric investigations of peyote and Some Rf values reported for Mescaline its alkaloids 242 258 Some Color Reagents and Reactions Re- Taraxein ported For Mescaline 258 244 Tolerance to mescaline Some color reactions of Mescaline 259 246 Cross-tolerance Mescaline Endnotes 260 247 Interactions between hallucinogenic drugs Chapter Six 261 249 Some odds and ends Pharmacology & Metabolism of Mescaline 261 249 Miscellaneous drug interactions with mes- Physical & psychological effects in humans caline 251 262 A few observations published on the phe- Use of MAOIs with mescaline nomenon of mescaline experiences 263 253 Assorted drug interactions reported in Individual variability of drug response animals 256 267 Lophophora williamsii 7 Sacred Cacti 3rd ed. Inhibitors of various components of mes- Notes on Cultivating Some Other Cacti caline-induced effects (in animals) 315 269 Desert varnish Pharmacology in animals 323 270 Comments on “other cacti” Mechanism of action (What we don’t 324 know) A comment on night blooming cacti 275 325 Some more recent thought Cactus Cultivation Endnotes 277 326 Suggested readings on the pharmacognosy Chapter Eight and physiology of peyote and its alka- 329 loids Utilization 278 329 Distribution, metabolism & excretion Peyote & mescaline; the plant & its use reported in animals 331 279 Other ways of ingesting peyote and San Metabolism and excretion reported in Pedro humans 336 283 Utilization endnotes Suggested readings on the metabolism of 340 mescaline Making an orally active tincture 284 343 Biochemistry of mescaline (Miscellaneous Chapter Nine observations) 345 284 Purifying and Producing Mescaline. Animal toxicity summary 345 286 Extracting and processing mescaline Mescaline pharmacology endnotes 347 286 A few words on emulsions Chapter Seven 352 293 Thoughts for the explorers among us the Cultivation & Propagation of Cacti 353 293 Suggestions for investigation or production Growing cacti from seed using modern technology 295 354 Cultivation of Peyote Related studies on enzymes and some 298 useful purification procedures, in, Grafting mostly, unrelated species 299 355 Cultivation of San Pedro Purification & isolation endnotes 302 356 Physically handling cacti Chapter Ten 305 359 Shipping & receiving a cactus Abstracts of Some Useful Manipulations 305 361 Propagation of San Pedro by cuttings Chapter Eleven 307 367 Problems & pests Chromophoretic Reagents & Assays 310 369 8 SC3: Table of Contents Chapter Twelve Suggested reading 373 397 Abstracts of useful assay approaches Cactus Phenethylamines: A Tabular Key to 375 their Structural Formulas Spectrophotometry and other approaches 399 378 Cactus Isoquinolines: A Tabular Key to Retention times reported in Gas Chroma- their Structural Formulas tography 403 379 Mescaline’s Krebs acid conjugates & other Chapter Thirteen compounds 381 408 Miscellany Cactus Triterpenoids & similar molecules: 381 A Tabular Key to their Structural Some authors, namesakes & contributing Formulas researchers (The following includes several related 383 compounds that do not occur in cacti; Some Knize Trichocereus offerings as they these are included for comparative have appeared listed by KK# purposes) 387 409 Suggested reading concerning phosphenes, Useful properties of some solvents com- drug or mind interactions with rhyth- monly used in chromatography mic stimuli (entrainment), and entoptic 413 imagery in rock & other shamanic art 396 Polaskia chende 9 Sacred Cacti 3rd ed. References Some questions that still remain 417 497 ICactus alkaloid cross-list Acknowledgements 469 511 Index 475 Trichocereus bridgesii W.Baker 5452 A proven active form that is purported to have indigenous use A bridgesii initially collected as a pachanoi. but we have been unable to locate any details. 10 SC3: Table of Contents Abbreviations µm = micrometer = micron ml = milliliter Å = angstrom MLD = minimum lethal dose BCE = before current era reported in literature BP = before present mM = milliMolar bp= boiling point mm = millimeter cm = centimeter mmp = mixed melting point dec. = with decomposition mp = melting point dm = decimeter (10 cm.) ms = mass spectroscopy et al. = et alia (“& others”) na = not available/applicable f = forma nd = not detected ft = foot nm = nanometer gc = gas chromatography nn = nomen nudum (named but gm = gram lacking any description) in = inch RT = room temperature im = intramuscular sc = subcutaneous ip = intraperitoneal sn = sine numero (lacking a ir = infrared collection number) iv = intravenous sp = species (singular) kg = kilogram spp = species (plural) kV = kilovolt ssp = subspecies subsp = subspecies LD100 = lethal dose 100% TD = toxic dose LD50 = lethal dose 50% mµ = millimicron (= nm) TLC = thin-layer m = meter chromatography ma = milliamp uv = ultraviolet MAO = monoamine oxidase v = volt MAOI = mao inhibitor var = variety X = indicates a hybrid Trichocereus peruvianus (Australia) These appear on first glance to vaguely resenble dried peyote buttons but are either an agate or another form of chalcedony with a fine drusy quartz coating on one side and lack critical features Petrified peyote (such as ribbed divisions or the distinctive apex) that are typically found in peyote buttons. The first reference to ‘petrified peyote’ was a misnomer in refer- They are amazing natural treasures but in our opinion are clearly ence to the Shumla Caves’ handmade 5 millenia old peyote effigies. not of botanical origin. (See Terry et al. 2006 for details.) More recently ‘petrified peyote buttons’ have been offered for sale at the Tucson Gem & Mineral Show and elsewhere. Compare the above to the dried peyote button on page 145. Rock sold as a petrified peyote button (front & back view) 11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stalking the Wild Lophophora PART 3 San Luis Potosí (Central), Querétaro, and Mexico City
    MARTIN TERRY Stalking the wild Lophophora PART 3 San Luis Potosí (central), Querétaro, and Mexico City e continued south on High- ticular—before retreating into the brush. It was way 101, leaving Tamau- not an appealing environment to spend time in, lipas and entering San and as soon as we had collected our samples and Luis Potosí just before we taken our photos, we left, heading further east- hit Highway 80, on which ward on Highway 80. we turned east toward El We stopped after a short distance to check Huizache. The latter is a a friend’s GPS record of what was reported village at the intersection to be “L. williamsii.” And we did indeed find of Highways 57 and 80. It is also the landmark Lophophora there, on both sides of the highway, Wfor the population that Ted Anderson selected as but it was L. koehresii, not L. williamsii. This the source of his neotype specimen to represent was another mud-flat population, and while the the species Lophophora williamsii. I had visited plants were not exactly abundant, we were able this population in 2001, and it was immediate- to find enough to meet our quota of tissue sam- ly apparent, now six years later, that the popula- ples without difficulty. Here again, there was no tion had undergone some changes for the worse. evidence that the L. koehresii had been harvest- There was evidence that plants were being dug ed, despite the fact that it was a heavily traf- up entire (including the roots, as opposed to the ficked area with much human activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluación Del Estado De Conservación Del Peyote Queretano Lophophora Diffusa Croizat (Bravo), Cactácea Endémica Del Desierto Querétaro-Hidalguense, México
    68 Cact Suc Mex (2012) 57(3):68-85 Evaluación del estado de conservación del peyote queretano Lophophora diffusa Croizat (Bravo), cactácea endémica del desierto Querétaro-Hidalguense, México Díaz-Segura Omar1*, Jiménez-Sierra Cecilia Leonor1*, Matías-Palafox María Loraine1 & Vázquez-Díaz Erasmo1 Resumen El “peyote queretano”, Lophophora diffusa, es una cactácea endémica de la región semiárida Querétaro-Hidalguense. Las poblaciones de esta especie son mermadas por el saqueo directo de individuos debido a sus supuestas propiedades químicas y curativas. Además, los sitios en donde habita están sujetos a transformaciones constantes por cambios de uso del suelo. La especie es señalada como amenazada (A) en la NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, como vulnerable (Vu) en la Lista Roja de la UICN y está incluida en el Apéndice ll de CITES. Sin embargo, la asignación de estas categorías ha sido un tanto subjetiva debido a la carencia de información sobre muchos aspectos de la biología de la especie. En este trabajo se aplicó el Método de Evaluación del Riesgo de Extinción de las Especies Silvestres en México (MER) (Anexo I de la NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010) con el fin de justificar la re-categorización deL. diffusa como especie en peligro de extinción (P). Palabras clave: Conservación, disturbio, especie en peligro, MER, Peyote. Abstract The “peyote queretano” Lophophora diffusa, is an endemic cactus from the semiarid region Queretaro-Hidalguense. Their populations have decreased by direct plunder of individuals due to their supposed healing and chemical properties. In addition, sites are subject to constant changes in land use. The species is designated as threatened (A) in the NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, as Vulnerable (VU) in the IUCN Red List and is listed in Appendix II of CITES.
    [Show full text]
  • PC20 Doc. 16.3 Annex 2
    PC20 Doc. 16.3 Annex 2 ASSESSMENT OF TRADE IN EPIPHYTIC CACTI AND REVIEW OF LISTING OF CACTACEAE SPP. IN APPENDIX II 1. This document has been prepared by Mr James Grogan under contract with the CITES Secretariat.1 2. Background information can be found in two key CITES documents: CoP15 Doc. 55, submitted by the Management Authority of Switzerland, describes the issue under consideration in this report, whether certain genera of epiphytic cacti (seven as listed below) should be excluded from Appendix II based on the preponderance of artificially propagated compared to wild- collected specimens in international trade; IUCN Red List conservation status is reviewed, and trade data for gross exports of wild-collected specimens from range nations during 1975–2008 are presented; PC19 Doc. 14.1, prepared by the Chair of the Working Group on the Periodic Review with assistance from the Scientific Authority of Mexico, presents further analysis of trade data during 1998–2008 including the number of specimens of epiphytic cacti in trade that were artificially propagated, number of records and specimens that were wild collected, confiscated or seized, or of unknown origin during this period, and geographic ranges of species in question. Natural range, morphology & taxonomy of the epiphytic cacti 3. The Cactaceae are a New World family except for one species, the epiphytic Rhipsalis baccifera, which is also found in Africa, Madagascar and as far east as Sri Lanka. Seven genera are considered here: Disocactus, Epiphyllum, Hatiora, Lepismium, PseudoRhipsalis, Rhipsalis, and Schlumbergera. 4. These genera are grouped in two tribes of the subfamily Cactoideae within the Cactaceae family: Hylocereeae: Disocactus, Epiphyllum, PseudoRhipsalis Rhipsalideae: Hatiora, Lepismium, Rhipsalis, Schlumbergera 5.
    [Show full text]
  • RMB-439 C-Formato.Indd
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 81: 163- 175, 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2010.001.186 Is geographical rarity frequent among the cacti of the Chihuahuan Desert? ¿Es la rareza geográfi ca frecuente entre las cactáceas del Desierto Chihuahuense? Héctor M. Hernández*, Carlos Gómez-Hinostrosa and Gibrán Hoffmann Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado postal 70-233, 04510 Mexico D. F., Mexico. *Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract. With the aim of assessing the extent of geographical rarity of Mexican Cactaceae, we calculated the distribution size (area of occupancy) of 142 species from the Chihuahuan Desert. In addition, using 2 variables (number of localities and range size), we preliminarily assessed their conservation status using the current IUCN Red List criteria. The results showed enormous variation in the areas of occupancy, although from the biogeographic and conservation perspective the most exceptional group comprises the extremely narrow endemics (42 species), whose range is restricted to areas smaller than 10 km2. Our results reinforce the reputation of this plant family as exceptionally rare geographically. We suggest that geographical rarity of Cactaceae in the Chihuahuan Desert is a natural phenomenon; however, we propose that the range of several species has been infl uenced by human activities. Regarding the conservation status of the species, 75 of them are categorized as Least concern. The remaining 67 species (47.2%) fall in 1 of the 3 categories of threat (27 Vulnerable, 11 Endangered, and 29 Critically endangered). These fi gures confi rm the critical conservation status of Mexican Cactaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2019 Lacactus.Com the Los Angeles Cactus & Succulent Society Newsletter LACSS P.O
    Volume 85, Issue 3 March 2019 lacactus.com The Los Angeles Cactus & Succulent Society Newsletter LACSS P.O. BOX 280581 NORTHRIDGE, CA 91328 CACTUS CHRONICLE MISSION STATEMENT The Los Angeles Cactus and Succulent Society (LACSS) cultivates the study & enjoyment of cacti & succulent plants through educational programs & activities that promote the hobby within a community of fellow enthusiasts & among the greater public. Monthly Meeting Program : March 20 years in the ATACAMACOPIAPOAthe land of the Similar to the coast of Namibia, the coastal and inland regions of Northern Chile, known as the Atacama, is mainly watered by amazing fogs, “the Camanchacas.” These fog-fed regions, in two of the driest deserts in the world, have some of the most interesting cactus and succulents to be found anywhere. The Atacama of Northern Chile has an endemic genus considered by many to be one of the most dramatic to have ever evolved, the Copiapoa. This ancient genus is also believed to be tens of thousands of years old, and there are those who feel it might well be on its way out! The ocean currents that affect the coastal Atacama have changed considerably over the last hundreds of years, and now its only source of moisture is primarily from consistent dense fogs. Some of these areas rarely, if ever, get rain and the plants that have evolved there live almost entirely off ReminderReminder REFRESHMENTS FOR MARCH! the heavy condensation from the Camanchaca. LAST NAMES STARTING WITH: (article continues page 2) S - Z SEE YOU AT THE MARCH MEETING AT THE ONE GENERATION CENTER LOS ANGELES CACTUS & SUCCULENT SOCIETY ISSUE 2 PAGE 2 (continued from page 1) There are many different Copiapoa species ranging from small quarter sized subterranean geophytes to giant 1,000-year-old, 300-head mounding clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Davis's Green Pitaya Echinocereus Viridiflorus Var. Davisii Houghton
    Davis’s Green Pitaya Echinocereus viridiflorus var. davisii Houghton And Nellie’s Cory Cactus Escobaria minima (Baird) D.R. Hunt (Syn. Coryphantha minima Baird) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office Austin, Texas 5-YEAR REVIEW Davis’s Green Pitaya / Echinocereus viridiflorus var. davisii Houghton Nellie’s Cory Cactus / Escobaria minima (Baird) D.R. Hunt (Syn. Coryphantha minima Baird) 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers Lead Regional Office: Southwest Regional Office (Region 2) Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Threatened and Endangered Species, (505) 248-6641 Wendy Brown, Recovery Coordinator, (505) 248-6664 Julie McIntyre, Regional Recovery Biologist, (505) 248-6663 Lead Field Office: Austin Ecological Services Field Office Adam Zerrenner, Field Supervisor, (512) 490-0057 x 248 Chris Best, Texas State Botanist, (512) 490-0057 x 225 1.2 Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is required under section 4(c)(2) of the endangered Species Act (ESA) to conduct a status review of each listed species once every 5 years. The purpose of five-year reviews is to evaluate whether or not a species’ status has changed since it was listed, or since completion of the most recent 5-year review. Our original listing as endangered or threatened is based on the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA. In the 5-year review, we first review the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, focusing on any new information obtained since the species was listed or last reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Rave Reviews of Psychedelics Encyclopedia
    00 - Third Edition Update.htm Key to Cover Photos: 1. cross-section of yage vine; 2. psilocybin mushrooms; 3. morning glory; 4. sinsemilla marijuana flower tops; 5. peyote cactus blossom; 6. Tabernanth iboga roots; 7, Amanita muscaria mushroom. Rave Reviews of Psychedelics Encyclopedia "Peter Stafford has an elephant's memory for what happened to Public Consciousness." - Allen Ginsberg "A delightful Rabelaisian social history of psychedelics in America." - Whole Earth Review "A look at the history, pharmacology, and effects of these drugs, based upon ... literature, folklore, and the author's personal experiences." -Library Journal "Fascinating .. , consumer-oriented exposition details history, botany, synthesis, and use of LSD, pot, cactus, mushrooms, street, and ceremonial drugs popular in the '60s." file:///C|/My%20Shared%20Folder/Stafford,%20Peter%2...-%20Introduction%20&%20Third%20Edition%20Update.htm (1 of 102)3/24/2004 7:33:35 PM 00 - Third Edition Update.htm - American Library Association, Booklist "A wealth of information on each of these mind-altering substances. Even those who disagree will find it an important resource." - Drug Survival News 'There's no end to the great new things you'll learn about dope in Psychedelics Encyclopedia ,.. authoritative." - High Times Magazine "A fine reference book, always engaging and easy to read .. .1 have no hesitation in recommending it as a source of interesting and reliable information." - Andrew Weil, M.D., co-author of From Chocolate to Morphine "Stafford's Psychedelics Encyclopedia,
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University
    BOTANICAL MUSEUM LEAFLETS HARVARD UNIVERSITY Cambridge, Massachusetts, November 19, 1937 Vol. 5, No. 5 PEYOTE (LOPHOPHORA WILLIAMSII) AND PLANTS CONFUSED WITH IT BY Richard Evans Schultes A state of great confusion exists at the present time in the ethnobotany of peyote. This is due partly to long and close association of peyote (Lophophora Williamsii (Lemaire) Coulter) with other plants in religious and ther- apeutic uses and partly to fragmentary and conflicting records of the use of the narcotic plants of Mexico in the early centuries after Spanish settlement of the country. As a result of this confusion, ethnological and other in- vestigations of the narcotic cactus are greatly hindered by widespread ambiguity in plant names. A clear under- standing of the complex of plants associated or confused with Lophophora Williamsii is absolutely essential to the further progress of anthropological investigation of the ever-increasing peyote-cult of the United States. 1 I. Common names of Lophophora Williamsii.'2 The variety of common names which refer to Lopho- phora Williamsii in the United States and Mexico is so great as to demand thorough consideration of the etymol- ogy, use, and significance of each name. Moreover, such treatment may be of value in bringing attention to cer- tain otherwise hidden facts attendant upon the aboriginal Footnotes will be found on pa^es 78-80 [61] use or upon the ethnobotanical relationships of the cactus with other economic plants. /. Peyote. Lophopkora Williamm is most commonly called pe- yote. This is the Spanish form of the ancient Nahuatlan peyotl. It is variously spelled: piote, piotU pcotc, pqjote % pent >t , peltote, pezote, and peyori.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrophytum Ornatum
    MARÍA LORAINE MATIAS-PALAFOX1,2*, CECILIA LEONOR JIMÉNEZ-SIERRA2, JORDAN GOLUBOV3 AND MARÍA C. MANDUJANO4 Botanical Sciences 95 (2): 245-258, 2017 Abstract Background: There are no previous studies on the reproductive biology of the endemic and endangered cactus species DOI: 10.17129/botsci.780 Astrophytum ornatum. Questions: Is fowering continuous or episodic? What are the breeding and mating systems and what foral visitors are Copyright: © 2017 Matias-Palafox associated? and Does the reproductive success change over time? et al. This is an open access article Study species: Astrophytum ornatum (Cactaceae). distributed under the terms of the Study site and years of study: Observations from 2010 to 2011, in the highest density population of A. ornatum in Creative Commons Attribution Li- cense, which permits unrestricted Metztitlán Canyon (Hgo. México). use, distribution, and reproduction Methods: Monthly surveys and monitoring of reproductive structures. Tracking fowers in anthesis. Controlled pol- in any medium, provided the original linations to determine the mating system and determination of the Outcrossing Index (OCI), the pollen /ovule ratio and author and source are credited. breeding system. Results: Astrophytum ornatum produced fower buds throughout the year, but 89.2% of them were aborted. Four events of ephemeral fowering population were presented per year. The species is self-incompatible and controlled pollinations indicated pollinator limitation of several bee species. The OCI indicates that the species is facultative xenogamous, and pollen/ovule ratio indicates obligate xenogamy. On average there were 54 seeds/fruit and individuals produced 4 Author Contributions. fruits/year. M. L. Matias-Palafox: conceived, Conclusions: The continuous production of buds had rarely been reported for cacti.
    [Show full text]
  • Západočeská Univerzita V Plzni Fakulta Filozofická Bakalářská Práce
    Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Bakalářská práce Peyote and Native American Church Alice Kulhánková Plzeň 2014 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Studijní program Filologie Studijní obor Cizí jazyky pro komerční praxi Kombinace angličtina – němčina Bakalářská práce Peyote and the Native American Church Alice Kulhánková Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Kamila Velkoborská, Ph.D Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Fakulta filozofická Západočeské univerzity v Plzni Konzultant: Robbie Ray Wood II Haskell Indian Nations University, Kansas Plzeň 2014 Prohlašuji, že jsem práci zpracoval(a) samostatně a použil(a) jen uvedených pramenů a literatury. Plzeň, duben 2014 ……………………… PODĚKOVÁNÍ Děkuji vedoucí mé bakalářské práce, Mgr. Kamile Velkoborské, Ph.D. za ochotné a hodnotné rady a dále všem, kteří přispěli ke zpracování této práce. Table of Contents 1.Introduction.............................................................................................1 2.Peyote....................................................................................................4 2.1.Peyote button..................................................................................5 2.2.Chemical Make-up...........................................................................5 2.3.Places of occurrence.......................................................................6 2.4.How is Peyote used.........................................................................6 2.5.History of Peyote and its use...........................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 55, No. 2
    Vol. 55, No. 2 March - April 2018 www.hcsstex.org 1 Vol. 55, No. 2 March - April 2018 From the editor After a cold winter Spring is in the air. In the morning hours of January 17th the temperature fell to 22º F at my house, and I am sure that was the warmer part of town. My cactus and succulents were protected, but some nice tropical plants froze. It is always sad to loose a plant we tended for a long time. But now there is room for more. Karla Halpaap-Wood Membership Kathy Fewox The January 24 meeting of HCSS was attended by twenty-five members. We were joined by two guests: Thomas R. Bacon IV, and Jane Littell. On February 28, twenty-one members attended our meeting. Also attending were three guests: John Pruitt, Albert Howell, and Kelly Shields (who is an officer in the Houston Chapter, Native Prairies Association of Texas). For the door prize, Karla Halpaap-Wood donated a very nice jade plant (Crassula ovata), which was won by Rolando Ontiveros. At the end of January Kathrin Schaaf and her family moved back to Germany after twelve years in Houston. Kathrin’s husband Christian accepted a position as Professor for Clinical Genomics and Medical Director of Human Genetics at the University of Cologne. I am sure they are happy for this opportunity to return to Ger- many, but we will miss having Kathrin in the club and watching her children grow. What a beautiful family, in every way! I am still in the process of moving to Blanco, making my usual slow progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Passion for Cacti and Other Succulents ISSN 2285 – 3987
    the passion for cacti and other succulents ISSN 2285 – 3987 10 Oct 2014 the passion for cacti and other succulents contents 3 · Editorial 10 97 · Sprekelia formosissima Ecology-Biology | Eduart | Xerophilia Conservation Contributions Connoisseur’s Notes 85 · When succulents attack! A peninsula under threat 4 · Carnivorous xeric flora in San 42 · Agave potatorum and other | Jennifer Pannell Luis Potosi. Mexico xerophytes in Tepanco de López, | Pedro Nájera Quezada Puebla | Francisco Moreno Aztekium valdezii Dossier 31 · Iconography of Agave univittata Haw. and Agave lechuguilla Torr. 57 · Mammillaria theresae Cutak and 95 · The step forward (Agavaceae) Mammillaria deherdtiana Farwig | Dag Panco | Piet van der Meer & al. (On the history of cv. albiflora) | Stefan Nitzschke Xero-Art Travelogues 72 · Touring some Lithops in the wild 98 · Some of my recent fine rta | Judd Kirkel Welwitch 17 · Three weeks in Mexico works Part one | Leo Rodríguez | Aldo Delladdio News & Events 52 · A Dane visiting Romania 48 · A new fantastic plant: Online Journals A story about friendship and Mammillaria bertholdii Linzen 103 · Online magazines cacti. spec. nova | Xerophlia Part one | Xerophilia | Erik Holm 61 · Festa del Cactus 2014 What’s cooking? | Andrea Cattabriga Bits & Pieces 105 · What else do we have prepared 101 · A sad summer for for Xerophilia 11 30 · An example of evolutionary the Romanian cactus | Xerophilia regression enthusiasts | Andrea Cattabriga | Xerophilia Founders: Eduart Zimer • Dag Panco • Valentin Posea • is resting with the authors. By simply submitting the papers for publication the Editorial team: Eduart Zimer - Editor • Dag Panco - PR • Andrea Cattabriga authors confirm that they are the legal copyright holders. Opinions expressed by - Graphic layout • Pedro Nájera Quezada - Field researches • Miguel Angel the authors in the journal are not necessarily those of the members of Editorial Gonzalez Botello - Cartography.
    [Show full text]