How to Win in the Game of Politics Your Own Lobby Groups, Pursue Higher Forms of Law, and Social Graces Therein

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How to Win in the Game of Politics Your Own Lobby Groups, Pursue Higher Forms of Law, and Social Graces Therein How to Win in the Game of Politics your own lobby groups, pursue higher forms of law, and social graces therein. I will however give you three ways to help the by JD Stuer Libertarian Party with constant lobbying commitments and simultaneously make participants more successful with both Unfortunately, almost money and position as a result. everything we have experienced as libertarians is a shroud over 1) Meme groups, social media groups, and party position: The our eyes. Politics is a very Libertarians actually form a glue between the Republican and tough subject with a lot of Democratic parties. We have become well-known as the emotional tension surrounding “mortar between the bricks” or “the referees” of the political issues often held dear to people. arena. These are powerful metaphors to use in social situations For this reason, the Republican to bridge the gap between the unreasonable Left and Right. and Democratic parties have Use powerful metaphors to draw power and interest from our adopted a “stick-to-it-iveness” opponent parties and/or people upset with these parties for about platform policies and letting them down, directing them towards Libertarian ideals! have functioned in the past like opposing mafia groups, 2) Find news articles about gridlock: These are easy to find but supporting only those who are arguably harder to respond to for Libertarians. The idea here is on their own side regardless of right or wrong. that gridlock isn’t all about Republicans or Democrats, but rather about Americans. Libertarians as being “the glue”, What I have noticed recently, in the polls and throughout the “mortar”, or “referees” between world, is that Republicans and Democrats, like gangs, have the two old parties holds a certain become increasingly more infatuated with winning. power to get more out of bills and demand Democrats and Where do libertarians fit in? We form oddly like a porcupine Republicans alike to consider group, but, true to form, we do fit in. We don’t function much third party interests in their like a gang since we maintain standards of peace, ethics, social legislation as a way to bridge liberty, justice, and economic sensibility – and so what sets us gaps between them and form a apart from the larger elephants and donkeys we are running up bond in gridlocked negotiations. against? Money, plain and simple. This indeed is the ultimate reason for our country’s 3) Go party with the blue politics, the non-malleable D emocrats and the red platforms, and the often R epublicans ( w earing gold) ! complete disregard for ethics Remember, without the help of and morals in the political an the old parties, it is much harder legal process. So the question to leverage the political then becomes what can we do environment. You may actually find yourself helping the two to get more money into the old parties to satisfy a gridlock issue and in return it could Libertarian Party, and the open the door to the funds Libertarian Party needs. answer again is simple: Libertarians are the real party animals! Best to party with Lobby for LP efforts! every party and bring back the best to the Libertarians. This helps us make the case directly so that our government can There are lots of how-to fully understand and begin to implement more libertarian videos, books, and content solutions to ongoing problems. (Think of it this way: Most out there about how to lobby printouts cannot be done with just cyan blue ink, or magenta and make a successful career red, they also need the yellow to print it out in full color!) doing it. I won’t attempt to We’re all Americans, remember, and we were never promised cover all of that material, but will leave it up to you to find 100% intelligent libertarians in federal or state houses even Page 1 Libertarian Party of Dallas County, Texas June 2021 since the country’s inception. President Washington warned as Are Medical Associations Responsible much in his farewell address. There will always be a share of Republican and Democratic stooges creating clannish for Your Irrational Medical Bills? divisions. Our goal is to learn to enjoy them, party with all by Naveen Sankar parties, negotiate, build our own individual platforms, all the The cost of healthcare has grown in America significantly over the last 60 years. Numerous attempts have been made to control cost, but none of them have seen any success. As of 2019, total healthcare expenditure stands at 17.7% of GDP. Many factors can cause the price of a service to rise. In a supposedly free market, such as in the US, it always comes down to the underlying market fundamentals. So let’s take a quick look at it. while lobbying for our party’s positions. These three things, if we communicated to the Republican and Democratic parties properly, would allow Libertarians better pay as referees. External Events Committee! Among many of the LPDC’s goals is our desire to send representatives regularly to the events of other groups, both like-minded and otherwise. The External Events committee manages the calendar of upcoming events around the county and keeps track of which libertarians attend which events. The law of demand says that at higher prices, This committee currently needs a chair! We could use a buyers will demand less of an economic good. reliable volunteer who has good organizational skills to The law of supply says that at higher prices, take on this role. If interested, send an e-mail to the LPDC sellers will supply more of an economic good. Chair! These two laws interact to determine the actual market prices and volume of goods that are traded on a market. Markets in which prices can move freely are always in equilibrium or moving toward it. For example, if the market for a good is already in equilibrium and producers raise prices, consumers will buy fewer units than they did in equilibrium, and fewer units than producers have available for sale. In that case, producers have two choices. They can reduce the price until supply and demand return to the old equilibrium, or they can cut production until the quantity Page 2 Libertarian Party of Dallas County, Texas June 2021 supplied falls to the lower number of units associations. This is where subtle changes were made to demanded at a higher price. But they cannot keep reduce long-term supply. The vehicle for this throttling was the price high and sell as many units as they did the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 championed by President before. Bill Clinton. Residency Cap of 1997 US med students pay for the first four years of their medical education either out of pocket, through student loans, or a combination of the two. Once a student graduates, they enter residency. In the residency phase, they practice care with an experienced physician. Funding residency training is another subject. A major player in this process is Medicare. Enter US Congress. Congress passed the BBA in 1997 partly in order to place some controls on the continuing growth of GME positions. The BBA contains several important changes in the GME funding Also, let’s take a quick look at what a cornered market is. mechanisms, designed to affect the number and mix of residents trained. Cornering the market consists of obtaining sufficient control of a particular stock, We must note that when Congress instituted this cap there commodity, or other asset in an attempt to was a predicted surplus of 70,000 physicians, and some in manipulate the market price. One definition of the medical field were worried about the ramifications of cornering a market is “having the greatest market having too many MDs in the United States. share in a particular industry without having a monopoly”. The impact of the law is better visualized by this picture published by a UCH Study. Just wonder what happens to all The asset that we are talking about is healthcare professionals those who are on the left side of the funnel. that can provide a service. By reducing the number of healthcare professionals, the supply stays down and keeps the service cost high. This is comparable to the strategy adopted by Gulf states when they formed the Oil cartel OPEC in 1960 to reduce oil supply production. Lack of transparency in the health insurance industry is also contributing to this problem, but that’s another article. The supply I am talking about here is new medical professionals. Let’s take a look at how medical trade unions such as the Texas Medical Association or American Medical Association are in a unique position compared to any other industry. They are in control of the supply while writing rules and regulations of their industry. Source: University of California Health The steps involved in becoming a physician presently consist of, at the minimum, a 3-step process. Texas Medical Association 1. Complete medical school and pass your boards to Coming back to my title, what does the medical association become a licensed doctor (4 Years) has to do with all of this? Do a search for ‘Texas medical 2. Complete your residency (3-4 Years) association’ online and you will find pushes to stymie efforts 3. Pass your final boards to practice independently to fix this government-created problem. The standard for all these steps is defined by medical Page 3 Libertarian Party of Dallas County, Texas June 2021 Medical trade unions effectively destroyed crown jewels of TMA Online Lobbying Effort American health care ‘teaching hospitals’ using the BBA of 1997, and now they are attempting to throttle the only other Texas’s 87th Legislature had bills open to change rules around source of medical professionals: advanced nurse practitioners.
Recommended publications
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Newecie Ter Special Pre-Convention Expanded Edition
    Published for friends e3 supporters of the Libertarian Party • .• •, • // 1 A A •0 jr Libertarian National Committee, Inc. • 2600 Virginia Ave, NVV, Suite 100 Washington DC 20037 • Phone: (202) 333-0008 • Fax: (202) 333-0072 MAY 2004 newecie ter Special Pre-Convention Expanded Edition Commanding presence: Retired Vice Admiral Michael Colley to address Atlanta Convention When the topic turns to recruitment, Alabama Libertarian views his role in the Michael Colley knows what he's talking about: The retired Alabama LP as a Libertarian rear admiral once directed the efforts of 5,000 Navy recruiters. "worker bee," and recently Now he's focusing that same energy on recruiting more found time to host an Libertarians. outreach booth at an arts and "I feel very strongly that increasing membership should craft fair in Fairhope, AL. be a top priority for the party," he says. "It's obvious that the He also travels the Democrats and Republicans aren't that much different from country as a science fair each other, and this year a lot of thoughtful citizens will pick judge, wins beautification our party." awards for his gardening But recruitment barely scratches the surface of Colley's skills, and is helping to raise Michael Colley naval experience: During the Gulf War, he commanded the money for the creation of the Pacific Fleet submarine force of more than 40 ships from his National Submarine Science Discovery Center. headquarters at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. He also directed the Colley is also a devout -- and generous -- Liberty Pledger, Naval Academy's Division of Mathematics and Science for who recently quintupled his monthly gift after visiting LP three years and held several other leadership posts.
    [Show full text]
  • Insid E the Cove R
    Libertarian Party Files Friend-of-the-Court Brief in D.C. Gun Case - Page 8 Members Sound-Off in “The Mailbox” - page 3 Committee Updates - page 13 February 2008 The Official Monthly Newspaper of the Libertarian Party Volume 38 / Issue 2 Torch Club Breakfast Ballot Access Status Increasing for Libertarian Party at Convention to By Sean Haugh cycle. The LPNC is joined in Honor Patrick Henry n Jan. 30, Wake Coun- this lawsuit by the NC Green ty Superior Judge Leon Party, as well as several Lib- By Andrew Davis O Stanback shocked ertarian candidates who were both sides of the lawsuit filed denied a spot on the ballot in his year’s Torch Club by the Libertarian Party of the 2005 elections. The trial Breakfast at the Na- North Carolina regarding bal- will probably take place in Ttional Convention is set lot access law in the state. The March, after which, either side to honor Patrick Henry, an in- ruling denied mutual motions may appeal to the NC Court of strumental figure of the Ameri- for summary judgment and Appeals and eventually the NC can Revolution. The “Patrick scheduling the case for trial. Supreme Court. Henry Breakfast” for Torch Although both the LPNC and Richard Winger of Ballot Club members will feature the state’s attorneys agreed the Access News commented, “It Gary Aldrich, president and facts of the case are not in dis- is encouraging that the judge founder of the Patrick Henry pute, the judge said he wants wants a trial, because it indi- Center for Individual Liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • An Agenda for a Greener, Freer, Smarter Right
    Oliver Stone for Pres? Nixon at 100 Everyday Anarchy The Pope’s Other Brain JOHN BUFFALO MAILER PAT BUCHANAN GENE CALLAHAN JEREMY BEER JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2013 ì ì#ììeìì ì ì # An agenda for a greener, freer, smarter right $4.95 US/Canada theamericanconservative.com Enjoy TheBlaze at no extra charge with America’s Top 250 package add it to another package for just $5 a month GLENN 1-888-675-6174 dish.com/theblaze BECK DISH Qualifying DISH service requires participation in qualifying plan and subscription to qualifying programming. Depending on qualifying plan, one or moree of the following will apply – activation fee (minimum $99), Social Security Number, credit approval,approval, 24-month Agreement, early cancellation fee. Offers end 1/16/13. Offer is subject to the terms of the Promotional and Residential Customer Agreements. AllAll prices,prices, packages, programming, features, functionality and offers subject to changechange withoutwithout notice.notice. © 2012, DISH Network L.L.C. All rights reserved. 252326_7_x_9.5.indd 1 12/6/12 4:43 PM Vol. 12, No. 1, January/February 2013 7 15 18 ARTICLES COVER STORY ARTS & LETTERS 15 Free Kentucky Project 12 Counterculture Conservatism 42 Two Cheers for Anarchism: Rep. "omas Massie continues An agenda for the right Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Ron Paul’s revolution. ANDREW J. BACEVICH Dignity, and Meaningful Work W. JAMES ANTLE III and Play by James C. Scott FRONT LINES GENE CALLAHAN 18 Oliver Stone vs. the Empire He talks to TAC about 7 Want to #x America? 45 Debating Same-Sex Marriage the bipartisan security state.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Libertarian Welfarism: Protecting Agency in the Night- Watchman State Marius S
    This article was downloaded by: [the Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford] On: 06 February 2013, At: 03:21 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Political Ideologies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjpi20 Towards libertarian welfarism: protecting agency in the night- watchman state Marius S. Ostrowski a a Magdalen College, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 4AU, UK Version of record first published: 25 Jan 2013. To cite this article: Marius S. Ostrowski (2013): Towards libertarian welfarism: protecting agency in the night-watchman state, Journal of Political Ideologies, 18:1, 107-128 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2013.750182 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Koch's Criminal Justice Hypocrisy in New Hampshire
    CCWWTT::^^RRWW11aa^^ccWWTTaabb´´ 666AAA000===888CCC444 BBBCCC000CCC444 ???AAA>>>999444222CCC 77^^ffccWWTTAAPPSSXXRRPP[[00VVTT]]SSPP^^UU >dc^UBcPcT1XV>X[1X[[X^]PXaTb 77PPbb77ddaacc==TTff77PP\\__bbWWXXaaTT 1 Charles and David Koch pour hundreds of millions of dollars into our political system to advance their self-enriching agenda and elect their puppet candidates. At the state and national level, the Kochs use their unlimited resources to influence policy to suit their political and personal needs while hurting middle class and working families. The policies they favor include cutting taxes for corporations and the wealthy; reducing and eliminating regulations to protect workers, consumers, and the environment; privatizing and cutting both Social Security and Medicare; and cutting other programs, including Pell Grants for college. For decades, the Kochs and their network of dark money political front groups have been pushing the Koch agenda in New Hampshire — perhaps more than any other state in the country — which has benefitted billionaires like the Kochs at the expense of Granite Staters. In 2016, New Hampshire will continue to be on center stage in American politics with the First In The Nation primary, a top- tier Senate race, marquee Congressional contests, an open governor’s mansion, and a number of hot button issues in the limelight. At the same time, the Koch network has promised to spend nearly $900 million to buy elections for candidates who will do their bidding for them. The Kochs themselves admit they “expect something in return” for the millions they spend propping up their candidates, but for candidates, backing from the Kochs comes with a high price tag.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need of State? American Anarcho-Capitalism
    Ad Americam Journal of American Studies Vol. 10, 2009 ISSN 1896-9461 ISBN 978-83-233-2905-3 Magdalena Modrzejewska THE NEED OF STATE? AMERICAN ANARCHO-CAPITALISM The paper examines the theory of anarcho-capitalists philosophers David Friedman and Murray Rothbard. Both philosophers argue for a society based in voluntary trade of private property (including money, consumer goods, land, and capital goods) and services (includ- ing protection services) in order to maximize individual liberty and prosperity. Moreover, they maintain that order exists in the pre-state situation, and any form of compulsion from the government/state violates that natural order. The paper examines how society can func- tion in such an anarchic, non-state situation (especially how the law and legal system can arise and exist without a state/government). Libertarians created a vision of an individual as a rational being, with a broad range of rights bestowed upon him/her, free from any form of external coercion. Therefore, they postulated that all relations between individuals should be established on volun- tary ground. Consequently, they faced the vital question of whether the existence of a state is required at all, and if so – how we could justify the rise of a state without the violation of the individual rights. In their reflection about the shape of the state, libertarians use methodological an- archism.1 “In political philosophy this method means that, as a starting point for their research, they use the state of nature as described by Locke or Hobbes, associated with anarchy, and then they show the possibility of overcoming such an anarchy and reaching in a rational manner the just social state” (Miklaszewska 1994: 21).
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Libertarian Party
    NNeeww JJeerrsseeyy LLiibbeerrttaarriiaann VOLUME XXVIII, Issue 8 Augustt,, 2002 © 2002 New Jersey Libertarian Party Page 2 – Are There Human Rights? By Tom Palven Page 2 – Who’s On The Dole? By John Paff Page 3 – Voter Affilation Update; Party Affiliation Form; Election Board Addresses Page 4 – Candidates Conklin and Carter Keeping Busy! Page 5 – From the Chair A good time had by all! The weather cooperated and turnout was good at the NJLP rd Annual Picnic and General Meeting. Page 7 – Minutes of June 23 Photo by Robert Hull Steering Committee Meeting Page 8 – Role of Political Director Page 9 – NJLP Members in Public Office Page 10 – County Info Left: Co-Host Len Flynn and activist Chris Weimann. Photo by John Paff. Page 11 – Membership Form See the September issue for the Minutes of the General Meeting held at our Annual Picnic Right: Senate Candidate Liz Macron. Photo by John Paff. Are there Human Rights? By Tom Palven Who’s on the Dole? As a long-time libertarian who originally came from the Goldwater right, I By John Paff have been a staunch supporter of the US Constitution and particularly the Bill of Rights. Many of my numerous letters-to-the-editor over the years have cited one or more of the Have you ever first ten amendments. However, at this late date I have reluctantly come to conclude wondered exactly who is that the term “rights” or “human rights” may be essentially meaningless, and that to cite collecting all those them as a cause for action or as a defense against governmental action is at best useless, and may even be counterproductive.
    [Show full text]
  • Miners, Vigilantes & (And) Cattlemlen: Overcoming Free Rider Problems in the Private Provision of Law
    Land & Water Law Review Volume 33 Issue 2 Article 7 1998 Miners, Vigilantes & (and) Cattlemlen: Overcoming Free Rider Problems in the Private Provision of Law Andrew P. Morriss Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/land_water Recommended Citation Morriss, Andrew P. (1998) "Miners, Vigilantes & (and) Cattlemlen: Overcoming Free Rider Problems in the Private Provision of Law," Land & Water Law Review: Vol. 33 : Iss. 2 , pp. 581 - 696. Available at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/land_water/vol33/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Land & Water Law Review by an authorized editor of Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. Morriss: Miners, Vigilantes & (and) Cattlemlen: Overcoming Free Rider Pro MINERS, VIGILANTES & CATTLEMEN: OVERCOMING FREE RIDER PROBLEMS IN THE PRIVATE PROVISION OF LAW Andrew P.Morriss* Law is a good like food, insurance, or housing. Like other goods, it can and often should be provided by private entities. Yet law is usually regarded as the quintessential public good, so obviously public in nature that we need not even discuss its provision by anyone but the State. As Bruce Benson observed "[a]nyone who would even question the 'fact' that law and order are necessary functions of government is likely to be considered a ridicu- lous, uninformed radical by most observers.", Even William Landes and Richard Posner, hardly apologists for the State, have concluded that law often must be publicly provided., Ultimately, the arguments for public provision of law turn on one as- pect or another of the free rider problem.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Siege Transcript
    #111 State of Siege: What the Free State Project Means for New Hampshire’s Public Schools Jennifer Berkshire Welcome to Have You Heard. I’m Jennifer Berkshire. Jack Schneider And I’m Jack Schneider. Berkshire And Jack, this episode features a trip down the rabbit hole. Schneider I feel like that's every episode. Berkshire No, actually, you don't even know rabbit hole until you've joined me for this episode. Schneider Okay. Well, here I am. I've joined you. Berkshire So the idea for this episode actually came from a book talk that you and I did in New Hampshire. And somebody who participated in that, he described a situation where things in his town were kind of unpleasant. And he asked a question just about, you know, like, did we have any tips about how to, you know, make the discourse in a community more positive around the schools? And I think we answered in kind of a generic way. We mentioned some conversations we've been having with other groups around the country. And then he and I started corresponding and I realized, wow, he's not just talking about like ordinary levels of acrimony. There is something really weird going on and I need to know more about it. And so that's where we're headed. Berkshire We’re going to Sunapee, New Hampshire. Are you ready? Schneider I'm ready. Let's do it. Jesse Tyler I'm Jesse Tyler, I'm a school board chair in the town of Sunapee, New Hampshire which has about 3,300 residents spread over many beautiful acres with an incredible pristine lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Polycentricity and the Theory of Order
    POLYCENTRICITY AND THE THEORY OF ORDER by Ion Sterpan A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Economics Committee: ___________________________________________ Committee Chair ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Department Chairperson ___________________________________________ Program Director ___________________________________________ Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date: ____________________________________ Summer Semester 2017 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Polycentricity and the Theory of Order A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University By Ion Sterpan Dissertation Chair: Peter J. Boettke, Professor Department of Economics Summer Session 2017 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Dedication To S.T. ii Acknowledgements As it is usually the case with doctoral research, this too reached its end due to other people’s inspiration, free giving and stable support. The trails I followed, and the way I did, were shown to me by Mihail Radu Solcan, Dragos Paul Aligica, Peter Boettke, Richard Wagner, Raluca Alecu, Dragos Bigu, Alexander Cartwright, Jim Caton, Christopher Coyne, Erwin Dekker, Mircea Flonta, Zhilong Ge, Tudor Glodeanu, Laurentiu Gheorghe, Cameron Harwick, Adrian Paul Iliescu, Mary Jackson, Cathleen Johnson, Roger Koppl, Peter Leeson, Jayme Lemke, Lotta Moberg, Mike Munger, Olga Nicoara, Jim Otteson, Marian Panait, Irina Papuc, Milosz Pawlowski, David Schmidtz, Emanuel Socaciu, Monica Somandroiu, Gheorghe Stefanov, Ilie Sterpan, Ioana Sterpan, Monica Sterpan, Virgil Storr, Rev. David Subu, Vlad Tarko, Radu Uszkai, Horia Terpe, Constantin Vica. Many others helped during and around the time of my fellowship with the F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics and Economics at George Mason University.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Really a Libertarian Case Against Open Immigration
    4/07/2008 Not Really A Libertarian Case Against Open Immigration Frank van Dun Speaking at the third annual meeting of The Property and Freedom Society in Bodrum on Friday, May 23, financial journalist Peter Brimelow 1 presented his views on immigration under the title “Immigration is the Viagra of the State—A libertarian case against Immigration.” However, his argument had little concern for the controversies that divide libertarians on the issue of immigration. 2 After a brief look at Brimelow’s comments, I shall consider the requirements an argument should meet if it is to amount to a libertarian case for or against a particular policy such as a liberal or a restrictive immigration policy. 3 Then I shall offer a critique of libertarian philosopher Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s attempt to build a case against immigration on widely accepted libertarian principles. Finally, I shall present some test cases for judging the plausibility of the argument. “Immigration is the Viagra of the state” One line of argument in Brimelow’s lecture referred to the familiar thesis that the combination of welfare state and immigration cannot work; therefore, because the welfare state will not go away any time soon, we should oppose open immigration. 4 For an apologist of the welfare state, this may be a sufficient argument against immigration. But what is its relevance to a libertarian? A second line of argument, seemingly at odds with the first, identified immigration as the “Viagra” of the welfare state: ““[T]he immigration influx of the late twentieth century into the US and the West in general … has reinvigorated the state, when it was otherwise losing its powers because of collapse of socialism and the triumph of classical liberalism.” 1 Peter Brimelow is the author of a.o.
    [Show full text]