DOCSLIB.ORG

Monthly Performance Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Monthly Performance Report September 2015 Total Transactions: FY 2013-14 : 4,92,510 FY 2014-15 : 6,81,422 FY 2015-16 : 4,44,681 (Till the review month) eDistrict Kerala Kerala State IT Mission, Vellayambalam Thiruvananthapuram Malappuram - e-District Monthly Performance Report for September 2015 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1. OVERALL DISTRICT PERFORMANCE FOR THE MONTH ................................................................................ 4 1.1. e-District Ranking Matrix ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1. e-District Performance – Service Reach .................................................................................. 5 1.1.2. e-District Performance – Service Quality ................................................................................. 6 1.1.3. e-District Performance – Approval Quantity ........................................................................... 7 1.2. Akshaya Performance in the District – Application Quantity ..................................................... 8 1.3. Health of e-District support infrastructure ......................................................................................... 9 2. TALUK LEVEL PERFORMANCE IN THE DISTRICT FOR THE MONTH ........................................................... 10 2.1. Taluk Office Performance ................................................................................................................... 10 2.2. Taluk Level Performance of Village Offices ................................................................................... 10 2.2.1. Nilambur Taluk .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.2.2. Eranad Taluk .................................................................................................................................. 12 2.2.3. Perinthalmanna Taluk ................................................................................................................. 13 2.2.4. Tirur Taluk ........................................................................................................................................ 14 2.2.5. Ponnani Taluk ................................................................................................................................ 15 2.2.6. Tirurangadi Taluk .......................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.7. Kondotty Taluk............................................................................................................................... 17 3. AWARDS & RECOGNITION ............................................................................................................................ 18 3.1. Top performers in the State for the month ...................................................................................... 18 2 | P a g e Malappuram - e-District Monthly Performance Report for September 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overall, Malappuram ranks 5th in terms 5 VOs in the district had of e-District performance in September processed only less than 100 '15 applications during Around 17 in 1000 population have September’15. received services under e-District in Malappuram during the month, which places the district at 5th position in terms of Service Reach but lower by 4.16 from September 2014 More than 87% of the applications were approved within the SLA, which places Malappuram at 6th position in terms of Service Quality Malappuram is at 1st position in terms of Approval Quantity for the review month at 72,250 with approval rate of 85.69% There is 1.1% rise in effective approval rate in September ’15 as compared to September '14 There is more than 31% increase in approvals in September ’15 quantity- wise as compared to September '14 Transactions-wise 84,313 applications have been submitted through e-District during the month which places the district at 1st position for Application Quantity Malappuram is at 2nd position in terms of Least Return % during the month at 4.89%. A detailed Performance Assessment is provided in the subsequent sections. Note: The statistics has been compiled based on the actual transactions data for the review month generated as on the 1st of the following month. 3 | P a g e Malappuram - e-District Monthly Performance Report for September 2015 1. OVERALL DISTRICT PERFORMANCE FOR THE MONTH e-District performance parameters including Reach, Quantity and Quality of transactions recorded during the month in e-District across various project locations within the district has been presented in this section so as to aid stakeholders in the analysis of the overall district performance, in comparison to other districts. 1.1. e-District Ranking Matrix The e-District ranking matrix provides the overall ranking of the districts for the month based on three performance parameters, viz. Reach, Quantity & Quality. Reach is the primary measure on which the districts are ranked, while quantity and quality of transactions are factors dependent on the same. Generally, any district which achieves high Reach in terms of service penetration through e-District consistently with more than 80% service level achievement is considered to be performing well, and 90% or more service level achievement September be considered as excellent performance. Based on the ranking for each of these parameters, the districts are classified into three broad categories, the best performing districts, the average performing districts, and those that need improvement. The best performing districts marked in Green are expected to strive to maintain their position, whereas the average performing ones marked in Orange as well as the lagging districts marked in Red are expected to take appropriate measures to move up to the ‘top four’ league. The ranking matrix for the month of September ‘15 is provided below: Rank District Reach Quantity Quality 1 KNR 1 3 4 2 PKD 2 2 11 3 WYD 3 13 2 4 KSD 4 10 13 5 MLP 5 1 6 6 ALP 6 6 8 7 IDK 7 12 10 8 EKM 8 4 1 9 KOZ 9 5 7 10 PTA 10 14 14 11 KLM 11 8 3 12 KTM 12 11 5 13 TSR 13 7 9 14 TVM 14 9 12 Best performing Average performing Needs improvement 4 | P a g e Malappuram - e-District Monthly Performance Report for September 2015 1.1.1. e-District Performance – Service Reach Service Reach based on applications approved in the State The district-wise breakup of the no. of people served in terms of applications approved; per Service uptake based on applications approved in Sep- 21.82 22.32 15 thousand of the district 19.30 19.76 17.57 16.49 population for the month is 15.40 14.91 13.60 13.23 examined here. 12.70 11.17 10.75 8.36 For e.g. If there are 1 lakh people in a district and if the no. of applications approved for the month is 2000, then the no. of people served per thousand shall be (2000/1lakh)*1000 = 20. Higher the no. of people served, better Figure 1: Service uptake based on population district-wise during the review month the performance. Trend in Service Reach (Approval) in Malappuram This shows the trend in Service FY14-15 Reach based on approvals for Service uptake based on approvals in MLP FY15-16 the district compared to the 19.43 17.57 19.06 18.15 last Financial Year 14-15. 15.83 14.74 13.41 10.83 15.72 10.94 The district holds the 5th position 7.74 13.03 12.98 11.00 11.35 12.23 in terms of service uptake 2.50 5.94 based on approvals in September 2015, and higher than the performance in September 2014. Figure 2: Break-up of No. of population served (per thousand) - Malappuram 5 | P a g e Malappuram - e-District Monthly Performance Report for September 2015 1.1.2. e-District Performance – Service Quality District-wise SLA Benchmark based on processing in the State The State best for SLA compliance during District-wise SLA Benchmark based on transactions for September 2015 is 91.32% Sep-15 recorded in Eranakulam, the State average being 86.31%. 91.32% 89.76% 89.64% 88.53% 88.33% 87.05% 86.80% 85.85% 85.33% 84.50% 83.79% 83.74% 82.75% 80.88% Figure 3: District-wise SLA achievement – September 2015 District SLA performance for Malappuram Malappuram holds the 6th position in terms of SLA compliance as 87.05% of certificates had been processed within the SLA in SLA Compliance, September 2015. 73,394 87.05% Received , 84,313 District performance Figure 4: No. of certificates approved within SLA– September 2015 6 | P a g e Malappuram - e-District Monthly Performance Report for September 2015 1.1.3. e-District Performance – Approval Quantity District-wise application approvals so far in FY15-16 nd Malappuram is at 2 place District-wise approvals so far in FY15-16 till Sep-15 based on the total no. of 401,488 certificates approved so for 374,238 339,276 323,260 in FY 2015-16. 265,987 250,679 216,188 189,288 186,914 176,983 121,104 113,797 106,177 82,820 Figure 5: District-wise approvals so far during FY 2015 -2016 District-wise application approvals in the month Malappuram holds the 1st position based on total no. of approvals District-wise approvals for Sep-15 72,250 during September 2015. 61,345 56,366 48,909 42,007 34,984 33,436 33,385 27,665 25,142 22,115 17,054 16,134 15,819 Figure 6: District-wise approvals – September 2015 Approval trend in Malappuram in FY15-16 There is more than 1.1% rise in
Recommended publications
  • IT/KGB/TENDER/3/98/2018 Date: 16-03-2018

    IT/KGB/TENDER/3/98/2018 Date: 16-03-2018

    Ref: IT/KGB/TENDER/3/98/2018 Date: 16-03-2018 TENDER FOR AMC OF COMPUTER HARDWARE ITEMS We invite sealed tenders on item rate basis from interested vendors for Annual Maintenance Contract of Computer Hardware Items installed at various branches/offices of our Bank in Trivandrum, Kollam, Pathanmthitta, Alappuzha, Kottayam, Idukki, Eranakulam, Thrissur, Palakkad, Malappuram, Wayanadu districts and part of Kozhikode district. List of branches and Hardware items are mentioned in Annexure D. The number of hardware items may be increased or decreased at the time of contract or even during the period of AMC which may be included or excluded from the list and the location of the equipments may also be changed. The AMC vendor shall include these items under the AMC on being informed by the Bank. Eligibility of vendor for Tender: The Vendor must have at least TWO direct offices in the mentioned geographical area (one office anywhere in TVM, KTM or EKM districts and another one anywhere in TSR, MPM or KZD districts) for fast and effective service support. Address proof of service support office or branch office should be produced such as PAN, Tax receipt, Certificate of registration like Shop & Establishment, Service Tax/Sales Tax/VAT/LBT/etc. The vendor must inform the full address and name of the office-in-charge. The vendor must have at least two qualified Service support engineers at each office above. The vendor must have an average annual turnover of Rs. 10 crore (As per last three years’ Audited Annual Financial Statement/Income tax returns - to be enclosed).
  • Trade Marks Journal No: 1799, 29/05/2017 P`Kasana : Baart Sarkar Vyaapar Icanh Rijast/I Esa.Ema.Raod Emta^P Ihla Ko Pasa Paos

    Trade Marks Journal No: 1799, 29/05/2017 P`Kasana : Baart Sarkar Vyaapar Icanh Rijast/I Esa.Ema.Raod Emta^P Ihla Ko Pasa Paos

    Trade Marks Journal No: 1799, 29/05/2017 Reg. No. TECH/47-714/MBI/2000 Registered as News Paper p`kaSana : Baart sarkar vyaapar icanh rijasT/I esa.ema.raoD eMTa^p ihla ko pasa paosT Aa^ifsa ko pasa vaDalaa mauMba[- 400037 durBaaYa : 022 24101144 ,24101177 ,24148251 ,24112211. fO@sa : 022 24140808 Published by: The Government of India, Office of The Trade Marks Registry, Baudhik Sampada Bhavan (I.P. Bhavan) Near Antop Hill, Head Post Office, S.M. Road, Mumbai-400037. Tel:022-24140808 1 Trade Marks Journal No: 1799, 29/05/2017 Anauk/maiNaka INDEX AiQakairk saucanaaeM Official Notes vyaapar icanh rijasT/IkrNa kayaa-laya ka AiQakar xao~ Jurisdiction of Offices of the Trade Marks Registry sauiBannata ko baaro maoM rijaYT/ar kao p`arMiBak salaah AaoOr Kaoja ko ilayao inavaodna Preliminary advice by Registrar as to distinctiveness and request for search saMbaw icanh Associated Marks ivaraoQa Opposition ivaiQak p`maaNa p`~ iT.ema.46 pr AnauraoQa Legal Certificate/ Request on Form TM-46 k^apIra[T p`maaNa p`~ Copyright Certificate t%kala kaya- Operation Tatkal saava-jainak saucanaaeM Public Notices svaIkRit ko puva- iva&aipt Aavaodna Applications advertised before acceptance-class-wise: 2 Trade Marks Journal No: 1799, 29/05/2017 vaga- / Class - 1 11-148 vaga- / Class - 2 149-202 vaga- / Class - 3 203-487 vaga- / Class - 4 488-518 vaga- / Class - 5 519-2037 vaga- / Class - 6 2038-2147 vaga- / Class - 7 2148-2287 vaga- / Class - 8 2288-2327 vaga- / Class - 9 2328-2729 vaga- / Class - 10 2730-2821 vaga- / Class - 11 2822-3027 vaga- / Class - 12 3028-3135
  • KERALA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT (KSWMP) with Financial Assistance from the World Bank

    KERALA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT (KSWMP) with Financial Assistance from the World Bank

    KERALA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT (KSWMP) INTRODUCTION AND STRATEGIC ENVIROMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF WASTE Public Disclosure Authorized MANAGEMENT SECTOR IN KERALA VOLUME I JUNE 2020 Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by SUCHITWA MISSION Public Disclosure Authorized GOVERNMENT OF KERALA Contents 1 This is the STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT SECTOR IN KERALA AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK for the KERALA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT (KSWMP) with financial assistance from the World Bank. This is hereby disclosed for comments/suggestions of the public/stakeholders. Send your comments/suggestions to SUCHITWA MISSION, Swaraj Bhavan, Base Floor (-1), Nanthancodu, Kowdiar, Thiruvananthapuram-695003, Kerala, India or email: [email protected] Contents 2 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE PROJECT .................................................. 1 1.1 Program Description ................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Proposed Project Components ..................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Environmental Characteristics of the Project Location............................... 2 1.2 Need for an Environmental Management Framework ........................... 3 1.3 Overview of the Environmental Assessment and Framework ............. 3 1.3.1 Purpose of the SEA and ESMF ...................................................................... 3 1.3.2 The ESMF process ........................................................................................
  • 1. ADOPTION of MINUTES the Minutes of the 123Rd Meeting of SLBC Held on 2017 Dec 21St at Thiruvananthapuram Was Circulated to Al

    1. ADOPTION of MINUTES the Minutes of the 123Rd Meeting of SLBC Held on 2017 Dec 21St at Thiruvananthapuram Was Circulated to Al

    124th MEETING OF STATE LEVEL BANKERS‟ COMMITTEE, KERALA AGENDA AND BACKGROUND NOTES 1. ADOPTION OF MINUTES The minutes of the 123rd meeting of SLBC held on 2017 Dec 21st at Thiruvananthapuram was circulated to all members vide our reference no SLBC35.50.2018 dt 2018. March 07th The House may adopt the said minutes. 2. PENDING ISSUES 2.1. PRIMARY SECTOR Nil 2.2. SECONDARY SECTOR 2.2.1. Issues involved in the implementation of PMEGP Scheme (Pending since March 2014) LSGIs are issuing licenses only after installation of machinery and banks insists for Local body licenses/NOC before disbursement of loans. Citing this reason many PMEGP applications are getting returned. A common direction is necessary for minimizing beneficiary grievances in this front. The State Level Review Meeting of SLBC, Kerala held on 27th & 28th June, 2016 recommended that: Licensing to be simplified by routing all the applications through single window system of DIC so that delay in getting licenses from line department could be reduced. Issue of license to install machinery and running permit to be clubbed into one step. Vide letter SLBC/SLRM 2016/191/GN/2016 dated 06.08.2016, SLBC Cell has submitted a speaking note to Chief Secretary. The substance of the note is: The present three stages licensing, may be merged into a single comprehensive license which may be issued at the beginning itself listing out the conditions to be satisfied. The Licensing authority can always inspect the factory at any stage and verify the violations of the license terms and take appropriate action.
  • Kerala Covid-19 Tracker: 121 New Cases & 79

    Kerala Covid-19 Tracker: 121 New Cases & 79

    7/1/2020 Kerala Covid-19 Tracker: 121 new cases & 79 recoveries today, total 2,057 patients under treatment | I&PRD : Official Website of Info… KERALA COVID-19 TRACKER: 121 NEW CASES & 79 RECOVERIES TODAY, TOTAL 2,057 PATIENTS UNDER TREATMENT Thiruvananthapuram, June 29: 121 new cases of Covid-19 were confirmed in Kerala today even as 79 patients under treatment have recovered from the infection. Briefing the media, Chief Minister, Shri Pinarayi Vijayan also informed that a 55-year old native of Tamil Nadu who died on June 24 at Manjeri Medical College has tested positive for Covid. Of the cases detected today, 78 people have come back from foreign countries and 26 from other states. Five are cases of local transmission, two persons in Ernakulam district and one each from Kollam, Idukki and Palakkad districts. Three health workers (two in Thrissur district and one in Ernakulam district) and nine CISF personnel in Kannur district have also got infected through contact. 26 persons from Thrissur district, 14 in Kannur district, 13 each from Malappuram and Pathanamthitta districts, 12 in Palakkad district, 11 from Kollam district, nine in Kozhikode district, five each from Alappuzha, Ernakulam and Idukki districts, and four each in Kasargod and Thiruvananthapuram districts are those who tested positive for Coronavirus. Those who came from foreign countries Kuwait 24, Saudi Arabia 14, UAE 13, Qatar 13, Oman 7, Bahrain 3, Nigeria 2, Malaysia 1 & Russia 1 and those from other states are Tamil Nadu-10, Karnataka-6, Delhi-5, Maharashtra-4 & Haryana-1. 18 patients from Kollam district, 13 in Kannur district, eight each from Alappuzha, Kottayam and Kozhikode districts, seven in Malappuram district, five from Thrissur district, four in Ernakulam district, three each from Thiruvananthapuram and Palakkad districts, and two in Kasargod district are those who tested negative today.
  • Problems of Salination of Land in Coastal Areas of India and Suitable Protection Measures

    Problems of Salination of Land in Coastal Areas of India and Suitable Protection Measures

    Government of India Ministry of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation A report on Problems of Salination of Land in Coastal Areas of India and Suitable Protection Measures Hydrological Studies Organization Central Water Commission New Delhi July, 2017 'qffif ~ "1~~ cg'il'( ~ \jf"(>f 3mft1T Narendra Kumar \jf"(>f -«mur~' ;:rcft fctq;m 3tR 1'j1n WefOT q?II cl<l 3re2iM q;a:m ~0 315 ('G),~ '1cA ~ ~ tf~q, 1{ffit tf'(Chl '( 3TR. cfi. ~. ~ ~-110066 Chairman Government of India Central Water Commission & Ex-Officio Secretary to the Govt. of India Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation Room No. 315 (S), Sewa Bhawan R. K. Puram, New Delhi-110066 FOREWORD Salinity is a significant challenge and poses risks to sustainable development of Coastal regions of India. If left unmanaged, salinity has serious implications for water quality, biodiversity, agricultural productivity, supply of water for critical human needs and industry and the longevity of infrastructure. The Coastal Salinity has become a persistent problem due to ingress of the sea water inland. This is the most significant environmental and economical challenge and needs immediate attention. The coastal areas are more susceptible as these are pockets of development in the country. Most of the trade happens in the coastal areas which lead to extensive migration in the coastal areas. This led to the depletion of the coastal fresh water resources. Digging more and more deeper wells has led to the ingress of sea water into the fresh water aquifers turning them saline. The rainfall patterns, water resources, geology/hydro-geology vary from region to region along the coastal belt.
  • PONNANI PEPPER PROJECT History Ponnani Is Popularly Known As “The Mecca of Kerala”

    PONNANI PEPPER PROJECT History Ponnani Is Popularly Known As “The Mecca of Kerala”

    PONNANI PEPPER PROJECT HISTORY Ponnani is popularly known as “the Mecca of Kerala”. As an ancient harbour city, it was a major trading hub in the Malabar region, the northernmost end of the state. There are many tales that try to explain how the place got its name. According to one, the prominent Brahmin family of Azhvancherry Thambrakkal once held sway over the land. During their heydays, they offered ponnu aana [elephants made of gold] to the temples, and this gave the land the name “Ponnani”. According to another, due to trade, ponnu [gold] from the Arab lands reached India for the first time at this place, and thus caused it to be named “Ponnani”. It is believed that a place that is referred to as “Tyndis” in the Greek book titled Periplus of the Erythraean Sea is Ponnani. However historians have not been able to establish the exact location of Tyndis beyond doubt. Nor has any archaeological evidence been recovered to confirm this belief. Politically too, Ponnani had great importance in the past. The Zamorins (rulers of Calicut) considered Ponnani as their second headquarters. When Tipu Sultan invaded Kerala in 1766, Ponnani was annexed to the Mysore kingdom. Later when the British colonized the land, Ponnani came under the Bombay Province for a brief interval of time. Still later, it was annexed Malabar and was considered part of the Madras Province for one-and-a-half centuries. Until 1861, Ponnani was the headquarters of Koottanad taluk, and with the formation of the state of Kerala in 1956, it became a taluk in Palakkad district.
  • List of Lacs with Local Body Segments (PDF

    List of Lacs with Local Body Segments (PDF

    TABLE-A ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES AND THEIR EXTENT Serial No. and Name of EXTENT OF THE CONSTITUENCY Assembly Constituency 1-Kasaragod District 1 -Manjeshwar Enmakaje, Kumbla, Mangalpady, Manjeshwar, Meenja, Paivalike, Puthige and Vorkady Panchayats in Kasaragod Taluk. 2 -Kasaragod Kasaragod Municipality and Badiadka, Bellur, Chengala, Karadka, Kumbdaje, Madhur and Mogral Puthur Panchayats in Kasaragod Taluk. 3 -Udma Bedadka, Chemnad, Delampady, Kuttikole and Muliyar Panchayats in Kasaragod Taluk and Pallikere, Pullur-Periya and Udma Panchayats in Hosdurg Taluk. 4 -Kanhangad Kanhangad Muncipality and Ajanur, Balal, Kallar, Kinanoor – Karindalam, Kodom-Belur, Madikai and Panathady Panchayats in Hosdurg Taluk. 5 -Trikaripur Cheruvathur, East Eleri, Kayyur-Cheemeni, Nileshwar, Padne, Pilicode, Trikaripur, Valiyaparamba and West Eleri Panchayats in Hosdurg Taluk. 2-Kannur District 6 -Payyannur Payyannur Municipality and Cherupuzha, Eramamkuttoor, Kankole–Alapadamba, Karivellur Peralam, Peringome Vayakkara and Ramanthali Panchayats in Taliparamba Taluk. 7 -Kalliasseri Cherukunnu, Cheruthazham, Ezhome, Kadannappalli-Panapuzha, Kalliasseri, Kannapuram, Kunhimangalam, Madayi and Mattool Panchayats in Kannur taluk and Pattuvam Panchayat in Taliparamba Taluk. 8-Taliparamba Taliparamba Municipality and Chapparapadavu, Kurumathur, Kolacherry, Kuttiattoor, Malapattam, Mayyil, and Pariyaram Panchayats in Taliparamba Taluk. 9 -Irikkur Chengalayi, Eruvassy, Irikkur, Payyavoor, Sreekandapuram, Alakode, Naduvil, Udayagiri and Ulikkal Panchayats in Taliparamba
  • Village-Wise Location of Minor Mineral Quarries in Tirur Taluk

    Village-Wise Location of Minor Mineral Quarries in Tirur Taluk

    Figure - 13 Village-wise location of Minor Mineral Quarries in Government of Kerala Tirur Taluk, Malappuram District Department of Mining and Geology (Based on quarry mapping carried out during 2011) Thiruvananthapuram 1633 ) 1630 ) 1628 Ottumpuram 1629) Pariyapuram ) ± KERALA STATE ¯ Mukkola KASARAGOD Malappuram District Kottakkal Pariyapuram Pariyapuram Kottakkal Chottiparambu Kottakkal Ponmala Rayirimangalam Villur KANNUR Perumanna 1613 390 ) Kottakkal Indiyanur WAYANAD 1608 ) 1604 Perumanna 1596 !( Tanur Nagaram Kuttippuram ) 1597 KOZHIKODE Omachampuzha 1595 )) 1609 1610) 1598 Tanur Karuvattiserri ) ) 1601 Ozhur 1605 1606 ))1611 1599) 1612 Tanur Chenakkal ) ) ) )1607 )1594) 1600) 1622 1580 MALAPPURAM 1615) )) 1582 1614 ) 1617 1626 1627 !( 1618 !(!( Kuttipala Kurunga 1616 1583 !(1625 ) ) )1632 1588 Parappur) 1587 PALAKKAD ) Keraladhiswarapuram Randathani Kizhmuri 1591 ))1585 Ponmundam ) 1586 1631 1634 ) ) ) 1620 1602 Ittilakkal Tozhunur TRISSUR Vallattur Marakkara 1584 Marakkara ) !(1592 Tanalur 1387 Kalpakancheri 1388) 1593 Malmuri) Vadakkumbram 1496 ERNAKULAM ) ) !( 1624 1623 1495 1485 ) 1385 Kadampuzha !( ) ) ) 1590 1484) 1476 Puthiyakadapuram Kalpakancheri ) 1483 )) 1486) ) 1490 1621 !( IDUKKI 1501 1500 1480 )1478 1386 ) !( ) ) 1378 1379 !( 1619 !(1499 1477 !( ) 1502 ) Talakkadattur !( !( !(1498 1479 KOTTAYAM Puttanattani ) 1481 )1489 1363 !( Tirur 1384 1362 1494 1493 Cheriyamundam ) Chunkam 1369 ) 1359 1377 !( ALAPUZHA ) ))) !( ) 1492!( Valavannur ))))1356 !( 1371 )) 1491 PATHANAMTHITTA Chelur 1459 ))) 1354 1376 Paravannur ) ))
  • ADIP Beneficiary Data 2017-18

    ADIP Beneficiary Data 2017-18

    Boarding Travel cost Age / Fabrication/ and No. of days whether Monthly Total Cost of Subsidy paid to out Totel of State District Date Name Father's / Husband's Address Gender Birth Type of Aid Given Qty. Cost of Aid Fitment Loadging for which accompanie Category PHOTO Income Aid Provided station (12+13+14+15) Year Charge Expences stayed d by escort beneficiary paid Puthenpeedika, Tana, 1 Kerala Malappuram 10-01-18 Nuhman Muhammed Pullippadam, Malappuram- Male 16 2,666 TLM 12 - 18 1 6,140.00 0 6140.00 6,140.00 0 0 6,140.00 0 YES Muslim (OBC) 676542 Nediyapparambil House, 2 Kerala Malappuram 10-01-18 Akshay Dev V K Damodaran N P Nilambur Post, Malappuram- Male 17 3,500 TLM 12 - 18 1 6,140.00 0 6140.00 6,140.00 0 0 6,140.00 0 YES Muslim (OBC) 679329 Veluthedath House, Vadakkumpadam Post, 3 Kerala Malappuram 10-01-18 Akshaya K R Radhakrishnan Female 16 4000 TLM 12 - 18 1 6,140.00 0 6140.00 6,140.00 0 0 6,140.00 0 YES Muslim (OBC) Vandoor, Nilambur, Malappuram Panthalingal, Kaattumunda, Pallippad, Naduvath, 4 Kerala Malappuram 10-01-18 Aslah P Mustafa P Male 12 2,500 TLM 12 - 18 1 6,140.00 0 6140.00 6,140.00 0 0 6,140.00 0 YES Muslim (OBC) Mambad Village, Thiruvali, Malappuram-679328 Cheenkanniparackal, Kattmunda, Naduvath Post, Christian 5 Kerala Malappuram 10-01-18 Sneha Philipose Philipose Female 17 4000 TLM 12 - 18 1 6,140.00 0 6140.00 6,140.00 0 0 6,140.00 0 YES Vandoor Village, Thiruvali, General Malappuram-679328 Palakkodan, Chenakkulangara, Naduvath 6 Kerala Malappuram 10-01-18 Linju P Narayanan Female 14 1500 TLM 12 - 18 1 6,140.00
  • Kadeeja-Mausaliyar-392002

    Kadeeja-Mausaliyar-392002

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1942 MACA.No.1433 OF 2010 AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 28/2008 DATED 30-01-2010 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL TIRUR APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT: NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. KASARAGOD NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT, MANAGER, KOCHI REGIONAL OFFICE, OMANA BUILDING,, M.G.ROAD, KOCHI - 35. BY ADVS. SRI.MATHEWS JACOB (SR.) SRI.P.JACOB MATHEW RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 KADEEJA MUSLIYAR, W/O.LATE MOHAMMEDKUTTY, KURUNKATTIL, PANKOL HOUSE, OTHUKKUNGAL AMSOM, MATTATHUR P.O.,, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2 SAIFUL ISLAM.V. S/O.LATE MOHAMMEDKUTTY, DO. DO. 3 IRSHAD V. S/O.LATE MOHAMMEDKUTTY, DO. DO. 4 SAMSHAD S/O.LATE MOHAMMEDKUTTY, DO. DO. 5 SHAHEEDA V.MINOR D/O.LATE MOHAMMEDKUTTY, DO. DO. 6 IRFAN V.MINORVC S/O.LATE MOHAMMEDKUTTY, DO. DO. (MINOR RESPONDENTS 5 & 6 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER GUARDIAN 1ST RESPONDENT.) THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-03-2021, ALONG WITH MACA.1952/2010(C), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MACA.No.1433 OF 2010 & 1952 of 2010 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1942 MACA.No.1952 OF 2010 AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 28/2008 DATED 30-01-2010 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL TIRUR APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS 1. KADEEJA MUSALIYAR, 43 YEARS, W/O. DECEASED VAIDYAKKARAN MOHAMMEDKUTTY, KURUNKATTIL, RESIDING AT PANKOL HOUSE, OTHUKKUNGAL AMSOM, P.O.
  • Public Notice for Sale/Auction of Immovable Properties {Under SARFAESI Act Read with Proviso to Rule 8 (6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules}

    Public Notice for Sale/Auction of Immovable Properties {Under SARFAESI Act Read with Proviso to Rule 8 (6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules}

    Corporate Office:-, “Axis House”, C-2, Wadia International Centre, Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Worli, Mumbai – 400025 Registered Office: “Trishul”, 3rd Floor Opp. Samartheshwar Temple Law Garden, Ellisbridge Ahmedabad – 380006 Retail Assets Center ;Axis Bank Limited, 2ND FLOOR,GLOBAL TOWER,NEAR V ZONE MALL PARAYENCHERI CALICUT-673016. Public notice for Sale/Auction of immovable properties {under SARFAESI Act read with proviso to Rule 8 (6) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules} Whereas the Authorized Officer of Axis Bank Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Bank’), under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short ‘SARFAESI Act) and in exercise of powers conferred under Section 13(12) read with the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 issued Demand Notice under Sec. 13(2) of SARFAESI Act calling upon the below-mentioned Borrowers/Co-borrowers/mortgagors/Guarantors to repay the amount mentioned in the notice being the amount due together with further interest thereon at the contractual rate plus all costs charges and incidental expenses etc. till the date of payment within 60 days from the date of the said notice. The Borrowers/Co-borrowers/mortgagors/Guarantors having failed to repay the above said amount within the specified period, the authorized officer has taken over physical possession in exercise of powers conferred under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act read with Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, which is to be sold by way of auction on “As Is Where Is Basis”, “As Is What Is Basis”, “Whatever There Is Basis”,for realization of Bank’s dues under Rules 8 and 9 of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 by inviting tenders/bids as per below Auction schedule: AUCTION SCHEDULE All the piece and parcels of immovable property admeasuring 3.906 Ares with all improvements thereon situated in Survey No.87/2 Amminikkad Amsom in thazhekkode village of Perinthalmanna Taluk in Malappuram district Sale deed No.