Precinctive Spider Species in India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Precinctive Spider Species in India © Indian Society of Arachnology ISSN 2278-1587(Online) PRECINCTIVE SPIDER SPECIES IN INDIA. Priyanka Hadole, S. Kamble*, S. Manthen* and A. Bodkhe*, Research Scholar, Department of Zoology, SGB Amravati University, Amravati-444602. [email protected] *J. D. Patil Sangludkar Mahavidyalaya, Daryapur, India. corrosponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper contains a systematic list of species and the literature references of the spiders precinctive in India. Spiders from 58 families, 340 genera and 1238 species are precinctive in India. However, there is an urgent need to revise all these species. Key words: Precinctive spiders, India INTRODUCTION The first information on the precinctive spider fauna of India came from the female specimen of Oxyopes indicus (Walckenaer, 1805). Thereafter, the work of Sundevall (1833); Walckenaer (1841); Blackwall (1864, 1867); Simon (1864, 1885, 1887, 1888, 1889, 1892, 1893, 1895, 1897, 1900, 1901, 1902, 1905, 1906); Frauenfeld (1867); Thorell (1868, 1891); Stoliczka (1869) O. P.-Cambridge (1870, 1872, 1873, 1874, 1877, 1885 , 1890, 1892, 1896); Butler (1873); Wood Mason (1877); Keyserling (1890); Walsh, (1891); Peckham & Peckham (1895); Pocock (1895, 1899, 1900, 1901); Leardi (1901, 1902); Strand (1907, 1912); Hirst (1909); Narayan (1915) Gravely (1915, 1921, 1924, 1927, 1931, 1935); Chamberlin (1917); Hogg (1922), Hingston (1927); Sherriffs (1927); Mukerjee (1930); Reimoser (1934); Caporiacco (1934, 1935); Bhattacharya (1935); Roewer (1942) and Fage (1946) initiated the spider research during British India. These workers reported 408 spider species from India which are endemic to India. Later on, spider research was geared up in India from 1962 by the work of Tikader (1960-1991), Gajbe (1975-2008), Biswas (1984-2004) and Patel (1972-2005) who reported more than 500 spider species precinctive in India. Siliwal and co-workers (2005-2015) reported 21 Mygalomorphs endemic to India. In addition to the Indian workers, large number of arachnologists outside India have also reported spiders precinctive in modern India. Prominent among them are Prószyński, Platnick , Jäger, Peckham & Peckham, Huber & Baehr. This paper lists the records of precinctive spiders from India along with related literature. Precinctive is the ecological state of a species being unique to a defined geographic location, such as an island, country or other defined zone, or habitat type. This contribution is the result of a critical revision of all data available on world spider catalog for the precinctive spiders in India. RESULTS Precinctive spiders in India comprises of 1238 species from 58 families and 340 genera. The most characteristic families are Thomisidae, Salticidae and Gnaphosidae containing 11.66%, 11.50% 10.51% precinctive species respectively among the total 1238 precinctive known spider species in India. Table-1 gives the family wise list of data of precinctive spider July 2015, Indian Journal of Arachnology, 4(1)........................................................................064 Precinctive spider species of India...........................Hadole, Kamble, Manthen and Bodkhe species in India. taking in to consideration the total diversity of all spider species (1698) from India the present finding of precinctive species is almost 72.9%. This appears to be very high endemism. The genus Zelotes Gistel, 1948 is the most numerous and can be regarded as a faunistic phenomenon since from all 28 species established in India, are endemics, distributed mainly on the ground below the stones. Astonishingly, females of 27 species out of 28 are known. Only male of Z. pexus (Simon, 1885) is on record. Other examples are Marpissa C. L. Koch, 1846 17 species out of 17; Ozyptila Simon, 1864 9 species out of all 9; Thomisus Walckenaer, 1805 41species out of 45; Miagrammopes O. P.-Cambridge, 1870 all 9 out of 9; Phidippus C. L. Koch, 1846 7 species out of 8; Tibellus Simon, 1875 7 out of 8; Uloborus Latreille, 1806 9 species out of 10 and ThanatusC. L. Koch, 1837 8 species out of 10 are precinctive. Family- Agelenidae C.L.koch, 1837 Genus: Agelena Walckenaer, 1805 Agelena barunae Tikader, 1970 (Female is known) Agelena gautami Tikader, 1962 (Both Male and Female are known) Agelena inda Simon, 1897 (Both Male and Female are known) Agelena oaklandensis Barman, 1979 (Both Male and Female are known) Agelena satmila Tikader, 1970 (Female is known) Agelena shillongensis Tikader, 1969 (Both Male and Female are known) Genus: Tegenaria Latreille, 1804 Tegenaria comstocki Gajbe, 2004 (Female is known) Tegenaria hemanginiae Reddy & Patel, 1992 (Both Male and Female are known) Tegenaria shillongensis Barman, 1979 (Both Male and Female are known) Family- Amaurobiidae Thorell, 1870 Genus: Amaurobius C. L. Koch, 1837 Amaurobius koponeni Marusik, Ballarin & Omelko, 2012 (Male is known) Genus: Himalmartensus Wang & Zhu, 2008 Himalmartensus mussooriensis (Biswas & Roy, 2008) (Female is known) Family: Anyphaenidae Bertkau, 1878 Genus: Anyphaena Sundevall, 1833 Anyphaena soricina Simon, 1889 (Female is known) Family: Araneidae Clarck, 1757 Genus: Arachnura Vinson, 1863 Arachnura angura Tikader, 1970 (Female is known) Genus: Araneus Clerck, 1757 Araneus altitudinum Caporiacco, 1934 Karakorum (Female is known) Araneus anantnagensis Tikader & Bal, 1981 (Female is known) Araneus bastarensis Gajbe, 2005 (Female is known) Araneus bilunifer Pocock, 1900 (Female is known) Araneus boerneri (Strand, 1907) (Both Male and Female are known) Araneus boerneri clavimaculus (Strand, 1907) (Female is known) Araneus boerneri obscurellus (Strand, 1907) (Female is known) Araneus himalayanus (Simon, 1889) (Female is known) Araneus hirsutulus (Stoliczka, 1869) (Female is known) July 2015, Indian Journal of Arachnology, 4(1)........................................................................065 Precinctive spider species of India............................Hadole, Kamble, Manthen and Bodkhe Araneus liber (Leardi, 1902) (Female is known) Araneus minutalis (Simon, 1889) (Female is known) Araneus obscurissimus Caporiacco, 1934 (Both Male and Female are known) Araneus panchganiensis Tikader & Bal, 1981 (Female is known) Araneus pontii Caporiacco, 1934 (Both Male and Female are known) Araneus sponsus (Thorell, 1887) (Female is known) Araneus viridisomus Gravely, 1921 (Both Male and Female are known) Genus: Cercidia Thorell, 1969 Cercidia punctigera Simon, 1889 (Both Male and Female are known) Genus: Chorizopes O. P.-Cambridge, 1870 Chorizopes anjanes Tikader, 1965 (Female is known) Chorizopes calciope (Simon, 1895) (Both Male and Female are known) Chorizopes congener O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885 (Female is known) Chorizopes kastoni Gajbe & Gajbe, 2004 (Female is known) Chorizopes khandaricus Gajbe, 2005 (Female is known) Chorizopes khedaensis Reddy & Patel, 1993 (Female is known) Chorizopes pateli Reddy & Patel, 1993 (Female is known) Chorizopes quadrituberculata Roy et al., 2014 (Both Male and Female are known) Chorizopes stoliczkae O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885 (Female is known) Chorizopes tikaderi Sadana & Kaur, 1974 (Female is known) Genus: Cyclosa Menge, 1866 Cyclosa bilobata Sen et al., 2012 (Both Male and Female are known) Cyclosa gossypiata Keswani, 2013 (Female is known) Cyclosa kashmirica Caporiacco, 1934 (Female is known) Cyclosa moonduensis Tikader, 1963 (Female is known) Cyclosa oatesi (Thorell, 1892) (Both Male and Female are known) Cyclosa neilensis Tikader, 1977 (Both Male and Female are known) Cyclosa purnai Keswani, 2013 (Female is known) Cyclosa simoni Tikader, 1982 (Female is known) Cyclosa tuberascens Simon, 1906 (Female is known) Genus: Cyrtarachne Thorell, 1868 Cyrtarachne avimerdaria Tikader, 1963 (Female is known) Cyrtarachne biswamoyi Tikader, 1961 (Female is known) Cyrtarachne gravelyi Tikader, 1961 (Female is known) Cyrtarachne keralensis Jose, 2011 (Female is known) Cyrtarachne promilai Tikader, 1963 (Female is known) Cyrtarachne schmidi Tikader, 1963 (Female is known) Cyrtarachne sundari Tikader, 1963 (Female is known) Genus: Cyrtophora Simon, 1864 Cyrtophora bidenta Tikader, 1970 (Female is known) Cyrtophora jabalpurensis Gajbe & Gajbe, 1999 (Female is known) Cyrtophora ksudra Sherriffs, 1928 (Female is known) Genus: Gasteracantha Sundevall, 1833 Gasteracantha sororna Butler, 1873 (Female is known) Genus: Larinia Simon, 1874 Larinia bharatae Bhandari & Gajbe, 2001 (Male is known) Larinia emertoni Gajbe & Gajbe, 2004 (Female is known) July 2015, Indian Journal of Arachnology, 4(1)........................................................................066 Precinctive spider species of India............................Hadole, Kamble, Manthen and Bodkhe Larinia jaysankari Biswas, 1984 (Female is known) Larinia kanpurae Patel & Nigam, 1994 (Female is known) Larinia mandlaensis Gajbe, 2005 (Female is known) Larinia teiraensis Biswas & Biswas, 2007 (Female is known) Larinia tyloridia Patel, 1975 (Both Male and Female are known) Genus: Neoscona Simon, 1864 Neoscona bihumpi Patel, 1988 (Both Male and Female are known) Neoscona biswasi Bhandari & Gajbe, 2001 (Female is known) Neoscona bomdilaensis Biswas & Biswas, 2006 (Female is known) Neoscona dhruvai Patel & Nigam, 1994 (Female is known) Neoscona dhumani Patel & Reddy, 1993 (Both Male and Female are known) Neoscona dyali Gajbe, 2004 (Female is known) Neoscona murthyi Patel & Reddy, 1990 (Female is known) Neoscona odites (Simon, 1906) (Female is known) Neoscona parambikulamensis Patel, 2003 (Female is known) Neoscona platnicki Gajbe & Gajbe, 2001 (Female is known) Neoscona raydakensis
Recommended publications
  • Archiv Für Naturgeschichte
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Archiv für Naturgeschichte Jahr/Year: 1905 Band/Volume: 71-2_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lucas Robert Artikel/Article: Arachnida für 1904. 925-993 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Arachnida fiir 1904. Bearbeitet von Dr. Robert Lucas. A. Publikationen (Autoren alphabetisch). d'Agostino, A. P. Prima nota dei Ragni deU'Avelliiiese. Avellino 1/8 4 pp. Banks, Nathan (1). Some spiders and mites from Bermuda Islands. Trans. Connect. Acad. vol. XI, 1903 p. 267—275. — {%), The Arachnida of Florida. Proc. Acad. Philad. Jan. 1904 p. 120—147, 2 pls. (VII u. VIII). — (3). Some Arachnida from CaUfornia. Proc. Californ. Acad. III No. 13. p. 331—374, pls. 38—41. — (4). Arachnida (in) Alaska; from the Harriman Alaska Ex- pedition vol. VIII p. 37—45, 11 pls. — Abdruck der Publikation von 1900 aus d. Proc. Washington Acad. vol. II p. 477—486. Berthoumieu, L' Abbe. Revision de l'entomologie dans 1' Antiquite. Arachnides p. 197—200 (Chelifer, Scorpiones, Galeodes, Aranea, Ixodes, Tyroglyphus et Cheyletus). Eev. Sei. Bourbonnais 1904, p. 167. Bolton, H. The Palaeontology of the Lancashire Goal Measures. Manchester. Mus. Owens Coli. Publ. 50. Mus. Handb. p. 378—415. — Abdruck aus Trans. Manchester geol. min. Soc. vol. 28. Brown, Rob. (I). Rectifications tardives mais necessaires. Proc- verb. Soc. Linn. Bordeaux, vol. 59 p. LXVIII—LXX. — Auch über Arachniden. Calman, W. T. Arachnida in Zool. Record for 1903 vol. XL. XI 47 pp. Cambridge, F. 0. Pickard. 1901. Further Contributions towards the Knowledge of the Arachnida of Epping Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Times and Biogeography of Spiders of the Subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang A, , Wayne P
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68 (2013) 81–92 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molec ular Phylo genetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular phylogeny, divergence times and biogeography of spiders of the subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang a, , Wayne P. Maddison a,b a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 b Department of Botany and Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: We investigate phylogenetic relationships of the jumping spider subfamily Euophryinae, diverse in spe- Received 10 August 2012 cies and genera in both the Old World and New World. DNA sequence data of four gene regions (nuclear: Revised 17 February 2013 28S, Actin 5C; mitochondrial: 16S-ND1, COI) were collected from 263 jumping spider species. The molec- Accepted 13 March 2013 ular phylogeny obtained by Bayesian, likelihood and parsimony methods strongly supports the mono- Available online 28 March 2013 phyly of a Euophryinae re-delimited to include 85 genera. Diolenius and its relatives are shown to be euophryines. Euophryines from different continental regions generally form separate clades on the phy- Keywords: logeny, with few cases of mixture. Known fossils of jumping spiders were used to calibrate a divergence Phylogeny time analysis, which suggests most divergences of euophryines were after the Eocene. Given the diver- Temporal divergence Biogeography gence times, several intercontinental dispersal event sare required to explain the distribution of euophry- Intercontinental dispersal ines. Early transitions of continental distribution between the Old and New World may have been Euophryinae facilitated by the Antarctic land bridge, which euophryines may have been uniquely able to exploit Diolenius because of their apparent cold tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Trade-Off for Batesian Mimics Running Title
    Out of the frying pan and into the fire: A novel trade-off for Batesian mimics Running title: Salticids that mimic ants and get eaten by ant specialists Ximena J. Nelson*†, Daiqin Li§ and Robert R. Jackson† *Department of Psychology, Animal Behaviour Laboratory, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Email: [email protected] Phone: 61-2-98509232 Fax: 61-2-98509231 §Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore †School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand Key words: Ants, Batesian mimicry, myrmecophagy, predation, spiders, trade-off Abstract A mimicry system was investigated in which the models were ants (Formicidae) and both the mimics and the predators were jumping spiders (Salticidae). By using motionless lures in simultaneous-presentation prey-choice tests, how the predators respond specifically to the static appearance of ants and ant mimics was determined. These findings suggest a rarely considered adaptive trade-off for Batesian mimics of ants. Mimicry may be advantageous when it deceives ant-averse potential predators, but disadvantageous in encounters with ant- eating specialists. Nine myrmecophagic (ant-eating) species (from Africa, Asia, Australia and North America) and one araneophagic (spider-eating) species (Portia fimbriata from Queensland) were tested with ants (5 species), with myrmecomorphic (ant-like) salticids (6 species of Myrmarachne) and with non-ant-like prey (dipterans and ordinary salticids). The araneophagic salticid chose an ordinary salticid and chose flies significantly more often than ants. P. fimbriata also chose the ordinary salticid and chose flies significantly more often than myrmecomorphic salticids. However, there was no significant difference in how P.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve
    Some Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Some by Aniruddha Dhamorikar Insects & Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve Aniruddha Dhamorikar 1 2 Study of some Insect orders (Insecta) and Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Kanha Tiger Reserve by The Corbett Foundation Project investigator Aniruddha Dhamorikar Expert advisors Kedar Gore Dr Amol Patwardhan Dr Ashish Tiple Declaration This report is submitted in the fulfillment of the project initiated by The Corbett Foundation under the permission received from the PCCF (Wildlife), Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, communication code क्रम 車क/ तकनीकी-I / 386 dated January 20, 2014. Kanha Office Admin office Village Baherakhar, P.O. Nikkum 81-88, Atlanta, 8th Floor, 209, Dist Balaghat, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Madhya Pradesh 481116 Maharashtra 400021 Tel.: +91 7636290300 Tel.: +91 22 614666400 [email protected] www.corbettfoundation.org 3 Some Insects and Spiders of Kanha Tiger Reserve by Aniruddha Dhamorikar © The Corbett Foundation. 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used, reproduced, or transmitted in any form (electronic and in print) for commercial purposes. This book is meant for educational purposes only, and can be reproduced or transmitted electronically or in print with due credit to the author and the publisher. All images are © Aniruddha Dhamorikar unless otherwise mentioned. Image credits (used under Creative Commons): Amol Patwardhan: Mottled emigrant (plate 1.l) Dinesh Valke: Whirligig beetle (plate 10.h) Jeffrey W. Lotz: Kerria lacca (plate 14.o) Piotr Naskrecki, Bud bug (plate 17.e) Beatriz Moisset: Sweat bee (plate 26.h) Lindsay Condon: Mole cricket (plate 28.l) Ashish Tiple: Common hooktail (plate 29.d) Ashish Tiple: Common clubtail (plate 29.e) Aleksandr: Lacewing larva (plate 34.c) Jeff Holman: Flea (plate 35.j) Kosta Mumcuoglu: Louse (plate 35.m) Erturac: Flea (plate 35.n) Cover: Amyciaea forticeps preying on Oecophylla smargdina, with a kleptoparasitic Phorid fly sharing in the meal.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Descriptions of Nine New Species of the Goblin Spider Genera
    Evolutionary Systematics 2 2018, 65–80 | DOI 10.3897/evolsyst.2.25200 Taxonomic descriptions of nine new species of the goblin spider genera Cavisternum, Grymeus, Ischnothyreus, Opopaea, Pelicinus and Silhouettella (Araneae, Oonopidae) from Sri Lanka U.G.S.L. Ranasinghe1, Suresh P. Benjamin1 1 National Institute of Fundamental Studies, Hantana Road, Kandy, Sri Lanka http://zoobank.org/ACAEC71D-964C-4314-AAA7-A404F23A6569 Corresponding author: Suresh P. Benjamin ([email protected]) Abstract Received 22 March 2018 Accepted 22 May 2018 Nine new species of goblin spiders are described in six different genera: Cavisternum Published 21 June 2018 bom n. sp., Grymeus dharmapriyai n. sp., Ischnothyreus chippy n. sp., Opopaea spino- siscorona n. sp., Pelicinus snooky n. sp., P. tumpy n. sp., Silhouettella saaristoi n. sp., S. Academic editor: snippy n. sp. and S. tiggy n. sp. Three genera are recorded for the first time in Sri Lanka: Danilo Harms Cavisternum, Grymeus and Silhouettella. The first two genera are reported for the first time outside of Australia. Sri Lankan goblin spider diversity now comprises 45 described Key Words species in 13 different genera. Biodiversity Ceylon leaf litter systematics Introduction abundant, largely unexplored spider fauna living in the for- est patches of the island (Ranasinghe and Benjamin 2016a, Sri Lanka is home to 393 species of spiders classified in 45 b, c, 2018; Kanesharatnam and Benjamin 2016; Benjamin families (World Spider Catalog 2018). A large proportion and Kanesharatnam 2016, in press; Batuwita and Benjamin of these species was described over the past two decades 2014). This now concluded project on Sri Lankan Oonopi- (Azarkina 2004; Baehr and Ubick 2010; Bayer 2012; Ben- dae was initiated to discover new species (Ranasinghe and jamin 2000, 2001, 2004, 2006, 2010, 2015; Benjamin and Benjamin 2016a, b, c, 2018; Ranasinghe 2017) and as a Jocqué 2000; Benjamin and Kanesharatnam 2016; Dong result of this project, 19 new species were discovered from et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Museum Annual Report 2004–2005 Queensland Museum Annual Report 2004–2005 Directory
    Queensland Museum Annual Report 2004–2005 Queensland Museum Annual Report 2004–2005 Directory Queensland Museum Queensland Museum Museum of Tropical Queensland PO Box 3300, Hendra Annexe 70 –102 Flinders Street SOUTH BRISBANE, QLD, 4101 122 Gerler Road TOWNSVILLE, QLD, 4810 Telephone: (07) 3840 7555 HENDRA, QLD, 4011 Telephone: (07) 4726 0600 Fax: (07) 3846 1918 Loans Service Fax: (07) 4721 2093 www.qm.qld.gov.au Telephone: (07) 3406 8344 www.mtq.qm.qld.gov.au Fax: (07) 3406 8355 The Workshops Rail Museum Geology Store North Street Telephone: (07) 3406 8344 PO Box 2234 Queensland Museum South Bank NORTH IPSWICH, QLD, 4305 Telephone: (07) 3432 5100 Corner Grey and Melbourne Streets Fax: (07) 3432 5114 PO Box 3300, www.theworkshops.qm.qld.gov.au SOUTH BRISBANE, QLD, 4101 Telephone: (07) 3840 7555 Cobb+Co Museum Fax: (07) 3846 1918 27 Lindsay Street www.southbank.qm.qld.gov.au TOOWOOMBA, QLD, 4350 Telephone: (07) 4639 1971 Fax: (07) 4638 5791 www.cobbandco.qm.qld.gov.au Lands, Mapping and Surveying Museum Corner Main and Vulture Streets PO Box 40 WOOLLOONGABBA, QLD, 4102 Telephone: (07) 3896 3000 Fax: (07) 3896 3275 WoodWorks: the Forestry and Timber Museum Corner Bruce Highway and Fraser Road Locked Bag 13, Fraser Road GYMPIE, QLD, 4570 Telephone: (07) 5483 7691 Fax: (07) 5482 1773 The Hon. Rod Welford, MP Minister for Education and Minister for the Arts Dear Minister, I take pleasure in presenting to you the Annual Report of the Board of the Queensland Museum for the year ending 30 June 2005. Anne Jones Chair Board of the Queensland Museum Presented to Parliament Queensland Museum Annual Report 2004–2005 Queensland Museum Our Vision The Queensland Museum is valued as an innovative, exciting and accessible museum of science, environment and human achievement, of international standing.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders from the Coolola Bioblitz 24-26 August 2018
    SPIDERS FROM THE COOLOOLA BIOBLITZ 24-26 AUGUST 2018 ROBERT WHYTE SPIDERS OF COOLOOLA BIO BLITZ 24 -26 AUGUST 2018 Acknowledgements Introduction Thanks to Fraser Island Defenders Organisation and Midnight Spiders (order Araneae) have proven to be highly For the 2018 Cooloola BioBlitz, we utilised techniques Cooloola Coastcare who successfully planned and rewarding organisms in biodiversity studies1, being to target ground-running and arboreal spiders. To implemented the Cooloola BioBlitz from Friday 24 to an important component in terrestrial food webs, an achieve consistency of future sampling, our methods Sunday 26 August 2018. indicator of insect diversity and abundance (their prey) could be duplicated , producing results easily compared The aim of the BioBlitz was to generate and extend and in Australia an understudied taxon, with many new with our data. Methods were used in the following biodiversity data for Northern Cooloola, educate species waiting to be discovered and described. In 78 sequence: participants and the larger community about the Australian spider families science has so far described • careful visual study of bush, leaves, bark and ground, area’s living natural resources and build citizen science about 4,000 species, only an estimated quarter to one to see movement, spiders suspended on silk, or capacity through mentoring and training. third of the actual species diversity. spiders on any surface Cooloola is a significant natural area adjoining the Spiders thrive in good-quality habitat, where • shaking foliage, causing spiders to fall onto a white Great Sandy Strait Ramsar site with a rich array of structural heterogeneity combines with high diversity tray or cloth habitats from bay to beach, wallum to rainforest and of plant and fungi species.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Spider Fauna of Bangladesh (Araneae : Arachnida)
    Bangladesh J. Zool. 47(2): 185-227, 2019 ISSN: 0304-9027 (print) 2408-8455 (online) CHECKLIST OF THE SPIDER FAUNA OF BANGLADESH (ARANEAE : ARACHNIDA) Vivekanand Biswas* Department of Zoology, Khulna Government Womens’ College, Khulna-9000, Bangladesh Abstract: Spiders are one of the important predatory arthropods that comprise the largest order Araneae of the class Arachnida. In Bangladesh, very few contributions are available on the taxonomic study on these arachnids. The present paper contains an updated checklist of the spider fauna of Bangladesh based on the published records of different workers and the identified collections of the recent studies by the author. It includes a total of 334 species of spiders belong to the infraorders Mygalomorphae and Araneomorphae under 21 families and 100 genera. A brief diagnosis of different families and their domination together with the distribution throughout the country are provided herewith. Key words: Checklist, spiders, Araneae, Arachnida, Bangladesh INTRODUCTION Bangladesh is basically a riverine agricultural country. It lies between 20.35ºN and 26.75ºN latitude and 88.03ºE and 92.75ºE longitude, covering an area of 1,47,570 sq. km (55,126 sq. miles). The country as such offers varied climatic situations viz., temperature, rainfall, humidity, fogmist, dew and Haor- frost, winds etc. (Rashid 1977). With the vast agricultural lands, also there are different kinds of evergreen, deciduous and mangrove forests staying different areas of the country viz., the southern Sunderbans, northern Bhawal and Madhupur forests and eastern Chittagong and Chittagong Hill-Tracts forest. Along with the agricultural lands, each of the forest ecosystems is composed of numerous species of spider fauna of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven
    Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Namadgi, ACT Bush Blitz Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 12 Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 5 2.3 Identifying the collections .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • L:\PM IJA Vol.3.Pmd
    © Indian Society of Arachnology ISSN 2278 - 1587 SPIDER FAUNA OF RADHANAGARI WILDLIFE SANC- TUARY, CHANDOLI NATIONAL PARK AND KOYNA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY Suvarna More and Vijay Sawant* P. V. P. Mahavidyalaya, Kavathe Mahankal, Sangli. *Former Professor and Head, Department of Zoology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur. ABSTRACT Diversity of spiders from Radhanagari Wildlife Sanctuary, Chandoli Na- tional Park and Koyna Wildlife Sanctuary in Western Ghats is studied for the first time. A total of 247 species belonging to 119 genera and 28 families are recorded from the study area during 2010-2012 with a dominance of Araneid, Salticid and Lycosid spiders. Key words: Spider diversity, Western Ghats INTRODUCTION Spiders comprise one of the largest (5-6th) orders of animals. The spider fauna of India has never been studied in its entirety despite of contributions by many arachnologists since Stoliczka (1869). The pioneering contribution on the taxonomy of Indian spiders is that of European arachnologist Stoliczka (1869). Review of available literature reveals that the earliest contribution by Blackwall (1867); Karsch (1873); Simon (1887); Thorell (1895) and Pocock (1900) were the pioneer workers of Indian spiders. They described many species from India. Tikader (1980, 1982), Tikader, and Malhotra (1980a,b) described spiders from India. Tikader (1980) compiled a book on Thomisid spiders of India, comprising two subfamilies, 25 genera and 115 species. Of these, 23 species were new to science. Descriptions, illustrations and distributions of all species were given. Keys to the subfamilies, genera, and species were provided. Tikader and Biswas (1981) studied 15 families, 47 genera and 99 species from Calcutta and surrounding areas with illustrations and descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 3 215 224 Andreeva Obituary.PM6
    Arthropoda Selecta 17 (34): 215224 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2008 Obituary. Íåêðîëîã In memory of Ekaterina Mikhailovna Andreeva (Katarzyna Andrejewa-Prószyñska) Ekaterina Mikhailovna Andreeva, referred to as retain her dignity, later married a land surveyor Kon- Katya in the following text, was born on 16.XI.1941 in stantin Pisarczik, had four children of her own, and Tashkent, Uzbekistan; she passed away on 18.IX.2008 cared for five others orphaned during the war and in Milanówek, Poland. Katya belonged to the third revolution (Fig. 2). She kept her family with a strong generation of remarkable women, of very strong per- hand, cultivating traditions and values, with Polish be- sonalities and unyielding characters, stranded in Cen- ing the language spoken at home. She died at the age of tral Asia, which for over a hundred years was one of 87. Her daughter, Antonina Konstantinovna Pisarczik, the regions for exiling criminals and victims of politi- a student of Central Asian ethnography at the Tashkent cal repression from the Russian Empire and then from University, was arrested in 1930 and imprisoned for the Soviet Union. During World War II prominent three years as a politically suspicious intellectual; luck- Russian scientists and their families were also evacuat- ier than some of her relatives, she survived. Later, she ed there. married a professor of ethnography at her university, The family saga began with a 15-year-old Polish Mikhail Stepanovich Andreev, one of the founders of girl, Maria Jasiewicz, who was exiled alone to Central Central Asian ethnography, also released from the pris- Asia in 1888 (or 1890) for complicity in Polish politi- on.
    [Show full text]