2030 Guam-Transportation Plan Chapter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2030 Guam-Transportation Plan Chapter Guam Islandwide Program Management Services Task Order No. 1A PB DPW FHWA- GU-NH-IPMS (002) 2030 GUAM TRANSPORTATION PLAN December 19, 2008 The Government of Guam Department of Public Works Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff International, Inc. Guam International Trade Center 590 South Marine Corps Dr., Suite 808 Tamuning, Guam, GU 96913 2030 Guam Transportation Plan Government of Guam Department of Public Works Prepared with financial assistance from the Federal Highway Administration Governor Felix P. Camacho Lieutenant Governor Michael W. Cruz, M.D. 2030 Guam Transportation Plan Guam Islandwide Program Management Services Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... S-1 S.1 Existing Conditions......................................................................................... S-1 S.1.1 Transportation Facilities......................................................................... S-3 S.1.2 Safety Programs.................................................................................... S-7 S.2 Future Demographic and Transportation Conditions.................................. S-7 S.3 Needs Assessment ......................................................................................... S-9 S.3.1 Roadway Improvements...................................................................... S-10 S.3.2 Mass Transit Improvements ................................................................ S-21 S.3.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements ................................................ S-21 S.4 Transportation Funding................................................................................ S-24 S.5 Policy Recommendations............................................................................. S-26 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background and Purpose of the 2030 Guam Transportation Plan..............1-1 1.2 Relationship to 2020 Draft Guam Highway Master Plan ...............................1-2 1.3 Relationship to Territorial Transportation Improvement Plan .....................1-3 1.4 Plan Development Process .............................................................................1-3 1.5 Statutory Requirements...................................................................................1-5 2.0 WHAT IS THE VISION?.......................................................................................................... 2-1 Goals for the Guam Transportation System..............................................................2-1 Goal 1—Safety ...................................................................................................2-2 Goal 2—Integrate Transportation and Land Use................................................2-3 Goal 3—Accessibility, Mobility, and Intermodal Connectivity.............................2-3 Goal 4—System and Services Efficiency ...........................................................2-3 Goal 5—Environmental and Resource Conservation.........................................2-4 Goal 6—Economic Diversification and Vitality....................................................2-4 Goal 7—Communication and Collaboration .......................................................2-4 Goal 8—Program and Project Funding ..............................................................2-5 Goal 9—Title VI Civil Rights/Environmental Justice...........................................2-5 Goal 10—System Preservation ..........................................................................2-6 Goal 11—System Security .................................................................................2-6 3.0 EXISTING DEMOGRAPHIC AND TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS ............................. 3-1 3.1 Why Are Existing Demographic Conditions Important to the GTP? ...........3-1 3.1.1 Existing Land Use...................................................................................3-1 3.1.2 Population and Employment...................................................................3-4 3.2 Why Are Existing Transportation Conditions Important to the GTP?.......3-10 3.2.1 Existing Transportation System............................................................3-11 3.2.2 Mass Transit .........................................................................................3-25 3.2.3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Systems ..........................................................3-41 3.2.4 Waterways............................................................................................3-44 3.2.5 Aviation.................................................................................................3-46 3.3 Transportation Programs—Safety and Security .........................................3-48 3.3.1 Traffic Record Information Management System .................................3-48 3.3.2 Occupant Protection and Passenger Safety.........................................3-48 December 19, 2008 i 2030 Guam Transportation Plan Guam Islandwide Program Management Services 3.4 Summary .........................................................................................................3-50 4.0 FUTURE DEMOGRAPHIC AND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS .................................................. 4-1 4.1 Future Population and Employment Projections ..........................................4-1 4.1.1 Future Population ...................................................................................4-1 4.1.2 Location of Future Population.................................................................4-3 4.1.3 Future Employment ................................................................................4-5 4.2 Future Transportation Conditions ..................................................................4-7 4.2.1 How Population and Employment Growth Will Impact Transportation.........................................................................................4-7 4.2.2 Future Travel Demand Modeling Scenarios ...........................................4-8 4.2.3 Baseline Scenarios.................................................................................4-9 4.2.4 Military Expansion Scenarios—Construction Peak (2013) and Military Build-up (2015).........................................................................4-14 4.2.5 2030 Full Population.............................................................................4-22 4.3 Mass Transit and Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ...................................4-23 4.4 Findings ..........................................................................................................4-24 5.0 NEEDS ASSESSMENT (UNCONSTRAINED)...................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Types of Needed Improvements .....................................................................5-2 5.2.1 Safety, Operational, and Intersection Improvements..............................5-2 5.2.2 Congestion-related Improvements..........................................................5-3 5.2.3 Transit, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Improvements .....................................5-3 5.2.4 Village Streets Improvements.................................................................5-3 5.2.5 Roadway Rehabilitation..........................................................................5-3 5.3 Haul Road Network...........................................................................................5-4 5.3.1 Overview.................................................................................................5-4 5.3.2 Haul Road Network Components ...........................................................5-4 5.3.3 Haul Road Network Improvements.........................................................5-6 5.4 Performance Measures and Evaluation Criteria............................................5-9 5.4.1 Roadway System Level Performance Measures..................................5-10 5.4.2 Roadway Operational Level Performance Measures ...........................5-10 5.4.3 Intersection Performance Measures.....................................................5-11 5.4.4 Bridge Performance Measures.............................................................5-12 5.4.5 Pavement Performance Measures .......................................................5-12 5.4.6 Safety Performance Measures .............................................................5-12 5.4.7 Transit Performance Measures ............................................................5-13 5.4.8 Bicycle and Pedestrian Performance Measures...................................5-14 5.4.9 Performance Measures and Continued Transportation Planning.........5-14 5.4.10 Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................5-14 5.5 Improvement Projects....................................................................................5-17 5.5.1 Tier I Congestion-Related Projects.......................................................5-17 5.5.2 Tier II Congestion-Related Improvements............................................5-21 5.5.3 Impact on Traffic Congestion—Tier I and Tier II Congestion- Related Improvements..........................................................................5-23 5.5.4 Rehabilitation Improvements
Recommended publications
  • 2019 TIGER/Line Shapefiles Technical Documentation
    TIGER/Line® Shapefiles 2019 Technical Documentation ™ Issued September 2019220192018 SUGGESTED CITATION FILES: 2019 TIGER/Line Shapefiles (machine- readable data files) / prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, 2019 U.S. Department of Commerce Economic and Statistics Administration Wilbur Ross, Secretary TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION: Karen Dunn Kelley, 2019 TIGER/Line Shapefiles Technical Under Secretary for Economic Affairs Documentation / prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, 2019 U.S. Census Bureau Dr. Steven Dillingham, Albert Fontenot, Director Associate Director for Decennial Census Programs Dr. Ron Jarmin, Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer GEOGRAPHY DIVISION Deirdre Dalpiaz Bishop, Chief Andrea G. Johnson, Michael R. Ratcliffe, Assistant Division Chief for Assistant Division Chief for Address and Spatial Data Updates Geographic Standards, Criteria, Research, and Quality Monique Eleby, Assistant Division Chief for Gregory F. Hanks, Jr., Geographic Program Management Deputy Division Chief and External Engagement Laura Waggoner, Assistant Division Chief for Geographic Data Collection and Products 1-0 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1. Introduction 1.1 What is a Shapefile? A shapefile is a geospatial data format for use in geographic information system (GIS) software. Shapefiles spatially describe vector data such as points, lines, and polygons, representing, for instance, landmarks, roads, and lakes. The Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri) created the format for use in their software, but the shapefile format works in additional Geographic Information System (GIS) software as well. 1.2 What are TIGER/Line Shapefiles? The TIGER/Line Shapefiles are the fully supported, core geographic product from the U.S. Census Bureau. They are extracts of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Statewide Travel Demand Model BEST PRACTICES for STATEWIDE MODEL DEVELOPMENT in COLLABORATION with LOCHMUELLER GROUP and CDM SMITH
    Illinois Statewide Travel Demand Model BEST PRACTICES FOR STATEWIDE MODEL DEVELOPMENT IN COLLABORATION WITH LOCHMUELLER GROUP AND CDM SMITH PARAG GUPTA | UP 598: MUP CAPSTONE | MAY 10, 2019 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1-1 Section 2 Network Development .................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Inside Illinois ................................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Geography ..............................................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Centroid Connectors ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 -State Roadway Attributes ....................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.4 Traffic Counts .................................................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.1.4.1 Data Sources ...................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.4.1.2 1.2 Traffic Count Development Methodology .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioarchaeological Perspective Michael Pietrusewskya, Michele Toomay Douglasa, Marilyn K
    This article was downloaded by: [Professor Michael Pietrusewsky] On: 07 November 2014, At: 13:30 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uica20 Health in Ancient Mariana Islanders: A Bioarchaeological Perspective Michael Pietrusewskya, Michele Toomay Douglasa, Marilyn K. Swiftb, Randy A. Harperb & Michael A. Flemingb a Department of Anthropology, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawai‘i, USA b Swift and Harper Archaeological Resource Consulting, Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands, USA Published online: 06 Nov 2014. To cite this article: Michael Pietrusewsky, Michele Toomay Douglas, Marilyn K. Swift, Randy A. Harper & Michael A. Fleming (2014) Health in Ancient Mariana Islanders: A Bioarchaeological Perspective, The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 9:3, 319-340, DOI: 10.1080/15564894.2013.848959 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2013.848959 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Schedule Carmel Catholic School Agat and Santa Rita Area to Mount Bus No.: B-39 Driver: Salas, Vincent R
    BUS SchoolSCHEDULE Year 2020 - 2021 Dispatcher Bus Operations - 646-3122 | Superintendent Franklin F. Tait ano - 646-3208 | Assistant Superintendent Daniel B. Quintanilla - 647-5025 THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, BUS OPERATIONS REQUIRES ALL STUDENTS TO WEAR A MASK PRIOR TO BOARDING THE BUS. THERE WILL BE ONE CHILD PER SEAT FOR SOCIAL DISTANCING. PLEASE ANTICIPATE DELAYS IN PICK UP AND DROP OFF AT DESIGNATED BUS SHELTERS. THANK YOU. TENJO VISTA AND SANTA RITA AREAS TO O/C-30 Hanks 5:46 2:29 OCEANVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL O/C-29 Oceanview Drive 5:44 2:30 A-2 Tenjo Vista Entrance 7:30 4:01 O/C-28 Nimitz Hill Annex 5:40 2:33 A-3 Tenjo Vista Lower 7:31 4:00 SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL 6:15 1:50 AGAT A-5 Perez #1 7:35 3:56 PAGACHAO AREA TO MARCIAL SABLAN DRIVER: AGUON, DAVID F. A-14 Lizama Station 7:37 3:54 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (A.M. ONLY) BUS NO.: B-123 A-15 Borja Station 7:38 3:53 SANTA ANA AREAS TO SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL A-38 Pagachao Upper 7:00 A-16 Naval Magazine 7:39 3:52 MARCIAL SABLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 7:10 STATION LOCATION NAME PICK UP DROP OFF A-17 Sgt. Cruz 7:40 3:51 A-44 Tracking Station Entrance 5:50 2:19 A-18 M & R Store 7:41 3:50 PAGACHAO AREA TO OCEANVIEW MIDDLE A-43 Cruz #2 5:52 2:17 SCHOOL A-42 San Nicolas 5:54 2:15 A-19 Annex 7:42 3:49 A-41 Quidachay 5:56 2:12 A-20 Rapolla Station 7:43 3:48 A-46 Round Table 7:15 3:45 A-40 Santa Ana 5:57 2:11 OCEANVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL 7:50 3:30 A-38 Pagachao Upper 7:22 3:53 A-39 Last Stop 5:59 2:10 A-37 Pagachao Lower 7:25 3:50 SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL 6:11 1:50 HARRY S.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Traffic Safety Zones and Integrating Macroscopic and Microscopic Safety Data Analytics for Novel Hot Zone Identification
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2014 Development of Traffic Safety Zones and Integrating Macroscopic and Microscopic Safety Data Analytics for Novel Hot Zone Identification JaeYoung Lee University of Central Florida Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Lee, JaeYoung, "Development of Traffic Safety Zones and Integrating Macroscopic and Microscopic Safety Data Analytics for Novel Hot Zone Identification" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4619. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4619 DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC SAFETY ZONES AND INTEGRATING MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC SAFETY DATA ANALYTICS FOR NOVEL HOT ZONE IDENTIFICATION by JAEYOUNG LEE B. Eng. Ajou University, Korea, 2007 M.S. Ajou University, Korea, 2009 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2014 Major Professor: Mohamed Abdel-Aty © 2014 JAEYOUNG LEE ii ABSTRACT Traffic safety has been considered one of the most important issues in the transportation field. With consistent efforts of transportation engineers, Federal, State and local government officials, both fatalities and fatality rates from road traffic crashes in the United States have steadily declined from 2006 to 2011.Nevertheless, fatalities from traffic crashes slightly increased in 2012 (NHTSA, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Guam 179: Facing Te New,Pacific Era
    , DOCONBOT Busehis BD 103 349 RC 011 911 TITLE Guam 179: Facing te New,Pacific Era. AnnualEconom c. Review. INSTITUTION .Guam Dept. of Commerce, Agana. SPONS AGENCY Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Aug 79 . NOTE 167p.: Docugent prepared by the Economic,Research Center. EDRS ?RICE . 1F01/PC07Plus 'Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annual Reports: Business: *Demography: *Economic Dpveloptlent4 Employment Patternp:Expenditures: Federal GoVernment: Financial, Support: *Government Role:_Local Government: *Productivity;_ Vahles (Data); Tourism - IDENTIFIER, *Guam Micronesia A ABSTRACT Socioeconomic conditions and developmentSare analysed.in thiseport, designed to ge. useful\ tb plannersin government and t_vr,. rivate sector. The introduction sunrmarizes Guam's economic olthook emphasizing the eftect of federalfunds for reconstruction folloVing SupertirphAon.Pamela in 1976,moderate growth ,in tour.ism,,and Guam's pqtential to partici:pateas a staging point in trade between the United States and mainlandQhina The body of the report contains populaktion, employment, and incomestatistics; an -account of th(ik economic role of local and federalgovernments and the military:adescription of economic activity in the privatesector (i.e., tour.isid, construction, manufacturingand trarde, agziculture and .fisheries and finan,cial inStitutionsi:and a discussion of onomic development in. Micronesia 'titsa whole.. Appendices contain them' 1979 uGuam Statistical Abstract which "Constitutesthe bulk Of tpe report and provides a wide lia.riety of data relevantto econ9mic development and planning.. Specific topics includedemography, vital statistics, school enrollment, local and federalgovernment finance, public utilities, transportation, tourism, andinternational trade. The most current"data are for fiscalyear 1977 or 197B with many tables showing figures for the previous 10years.(J11) A , . ***************t*********************************************t********* * .
    [Show full text]
  • Census 2000 Geographic Terms and Concepts
    Appendix A. Census 2000 Geographic Terms and Concepts CONTENTS Page Alaska Native Regional Corporation (ANRC) (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land) .......................................................................... A–4 Alaska Native Village (ANV) (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land)..................................................................................... A–5 Alaska Native Village Statistical Area (ANVSA) (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land).................................................................... A–5 AmericanIndianArea,AlaskaNativeArea,HawaiianHomeLand.............................A–4 American Indian Off-Reservation Trust Land (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land).................................................................... A–5 American Indian Reservation (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land)..................................................................................... A–5 American Indian Tribal Subdivision (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land) .......................................................................... A–6 American Samoa (See Island Areas of the United States)....................................... A–15 AreaMeasurement..............................................................................A–7 Barrio (See Puerto Rico) ......................................................................... A–19 Barrio-Pueblo
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Use Customs on Guam an Exploratory Study
    8 2 8 G U 7 9 L.I:-\'I\RY INT.,NATIONAL R[ FOR CO^.: ^,TY W SAMIATJON (IRC) FRESHWATER USE CUSTOMS ON GUAM AN EXPLORATORY STUDY Technical Report No. 8 iei- (;J/O; 8;4J ii ext 141/142 LO: FRESHWATER USE CUSTOMS ON AN EXPLORATORY STUDY Rebecca A. Stephenson, Editor UNIVERSITY OF GUAM Water Resources Research Center Technical Report No. 8 April 1979 Partial Project Completion Report for SOCIOCULTURAL DETERMINANTS OF FRESHWATER USES IN GUAM OWRT Project No. A-009-Guam, Grant Agreement Nos. 14-34-0001-8012,9012 Principal Investigator: Rebecca A- Stephenson Project Period: October 1, 1977 to September 30, 1979 The work upon which this publication is based was supported in part by funds provided by the Office of Water Research and Technology, U. S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C, as authorized by the Water Research and Development Act of 1978. T Contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Office of Water Research and Technology, U. S. Department of the Interior, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute their endorsement or recommendation for use by the U- S. Government. ii ABSTRACT Traditional Chamorro freshwater use customs on Guam still exist, at least in the recollections of Chamorros above the age of 40, if not in actual practice in the present day. Such customs were analyzed in both their past and present contexts, and are documented to provide possible insights into more effective systems of acquiring and maintain- ing a sufficient supply of freshwater on Guam.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAMORRO CULTURAL and RESEARCH CENTER Barbara Jean Cushing
    CHAMORRO CULTURAL AND RESEARCH CENTER Barbara Jean Cushing December 2009 Submitted towards the fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Architecture degree. University of Hawaii̒ at Mānoa School of Architecture Spencer Leineweber, Chairperson Joe Quinata Sharon Williams Barbara Jean Cushing 2 Chamorro Cultural and Research Center Chamorro Cultural and Research Center Barbara Jean Cushing December 2009 ___________________________________________________________ We certify that we have read this Doctorate Project and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Architecture in the School of Architecture, University of Hawaii̒ at Mānoa. Doctorate Project Committee ______________________________________________ Spencer Leineweber, Chairperson ______________________________________________ Joe Quinata ______________________________________________ Sharon Williams Barbara Jean Cushing 3 Chamorro Cultural and Research Center CONTENTS 04 Abstract phase 02 THE DESIGN 08 Field Of Study 93 The Next Step 11 Statement 96 Site Analysis 107 Program phase 01 THE RESEARCH 119 Three Concepts 14 Pre‐Contact 146 The Center 39 Post‐Contract 182 Conclusion 57 Case Studies 183 Works Sited 87 ARCH 548 186 Bibliography Barbara Jean Cushing 4 Chamorro Cultural and Research Center ABSTRACT PURPOSE My architectural doctorate thesis, titled ‘Chamorro Cultural and Research Center’, is the final educational work that displays the wealth of knowledge that I have obtained throughout the last nine years of my life. In this single document, it represents who I have become and identifies the path that I will be traveling in the years to follow. One thing was for certain when beginning this process, in that Guam and my Chamorro heritage were to be important components of the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Public Works Division of Bus Operations Pupil Transportation Bus Schedule School Year 2017-2018
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF BUS OPERATIONS PUPIL TRANSPORTATION BUS SCHEDULE SCHOOL YEAR 2017-2018 DRIVER: AGUON, DAVID F. BUS NO. B-123 SUPERVISOR: TAIJERON, RICKY U. SUBSTATION: AGAT MORNING AFTERNOON STUDENT S T A T I O N S PICK-UP DROP-OFF COUNT MILEAGE AGAT SUBSTATION SANTA ANA AREAS TO SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL STATION LOCATION NAME A-44 Tracking Station Entrance 5:50 2:19 A-43 Cruz #2 5:52 2:17 A-42 San Nicolas 5:54 2:15 A-41 Quidachay 5:56 2:12 A-40 Santa Ana 5:57 2:11 A-39 Last Stop 5:59 2:10 SOUTHERN HIGH SCHOOL 6:11 1:50 SANTA ANA AREAS TO MARCIAL SABLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A-44 Tracking Station Entrance 7:02 3:03 A-43 Cruz #2 7:00 3:02 A-42 San Nicolas 7:04 3:00 A-41 Quidachay 7:07 2:57 A-40 Santa Ana 7:09 2:53 A-39 Last Stop 7:11 MARCIAL SABLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 7:15 2:40 SANTA ANA AREAS TO OCEANVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL A-44 Tracking Station Entrance 7:22 3:57 A-43 Cruz #2 7:20 3:55 A-42 San Nicolas 7:24 3:53 A-41 Quidachay 7:26 3:51 A-40 Santa Ana 7:28 3:49 A-39 Last Stop 7:30 3:47 OCEANVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL 7:35 3:30 A-1 1 OF 1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF BUS OPERATIONS PUPIL TRANSPORTATION BUS SCHEDULE SCHOOL YEAR 2017-2018 DRIVER: BORJA, GARY P.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Census Data for Transportation
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C233 May 2018 Applying Census Data for Transportation 50 Years of Transportation Planning Data Progress November 14–16, 2017 Kansas City, Missouri TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2017 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Malcolm Dougherty, Director, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento Vice Chair: Katherine F. Turnbull, Executive Associate Director and Research Scientist, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station Division Chair for NRC Oversight: Susan Hanson, Distinguished University Professor Emerita, School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts Executive Director: Neil J. Pedersen, Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2017–2018 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Hyun-A C. Park, President, Spy Pond Partners, LLC, Arlington, Massachusetts Technical Activities Director: Ann M. Brach, Transportation Research Board David Ballard, Senior Economist Gellman Research Associates, Inc., Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, Aviation Group Chair Coco Briseno, Deputy Director, Planning and Modal Programs, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, State DOT Representative Anne Goodchild, Associate Professor, University of Washington, Seattle, Freight Systems Group Chair George Grimes, CEO Advisor, Patriot Rail Company, Denver, Colorado, Rail Group Chair David Harkey, Director, Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Safety and Systems Users Group Chair Dennis Hinebaugh, Director, National Bus Rapid Transit Institute,
    [Show full text]
  • Bill No. 85-33 (COR)
    I lWINA'TRENTAI TRES NA LIHESLATURAN GUAHAN 2015 (FIRST) Regular Session Bill No Introduced by: T. C. Ada AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE GUAM REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (GRTA) TO ENTER INTO A LONG TERM PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP THAT WILL ENABLE AN INVESTOR FINANCED IMPLEMENT A TI ON OF THE GOVERN~1ENT OF GlJAivl TRANSIT BUSINESS PLAN 2009-2015. '~ 1 Section I. Findings & Intent. 1 Lihes/aturan Guahan finds that an effec'\iii-e \:o\_ 2 and efficient public transit system is needed to support Guam· s growing popu.J)i{ion '• '°'\%, 3 and economic development. •" 4 And I Liheslaturan Guahan further finds that a similar observation was 5 made by the Governor of Guam on February 20, 2014 through Executive Order 6 2014-04 noting that despite millions of dollars of annual subsidies, Guam's public 7 transit system is: ( J) "lacking in timeliness, re!iahi/i(y. accessibility··· al! necessary 8 fi111ctions of'transportation and economy ... ". and (2) " ... As the demand [f(Jr 9 transportation related services} grows. so do the concerns over traffic 10 congestion ... ". and 0) " ... improving acccssihi!i(v to contemporary transportation 11 to all Guamanians is a priority .. 12 1 Lihes/aturan Guahan further finds that the island's public transit system is 13 rapidly deteriorating. Consequently the eJlectiveness of the current system is being 14 negatively impacted and is losing its ability to eHiciently serve as an alternate 1 1 mode of transportation. This is evidenced by the fact that ridership has declined 2 30% in the past 4 years. 3 I Liheslaturan Guahan additionally finds that in a December 2008 study, 4 jointly commissioned by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the 5 Department of Public \Yorks (DP\V) and which formed the basis for the 2030 6 Guam Transportation MasterPlan, the following findings were made.
    [Show full text]