Guide to Upper Columbia Final
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013
L O CA L GOVERNMEN TS’ COMMI TTEE Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013 The BC Columbia River Treaty Local Governments’ Committee (the Committee) has prepared these Recommendations in response to the Columbia River Treaty-related interests and issues raised by Columbia River Basin residents in Canada. These Recommendations are based on currently-available information. They have been submitted to the provincial and federal governments for incorporation into current decisions regarding the future of the Columbia River Treaty (CRT). The Committee plans to monitor the BC, Canadian and U.S. CRT-related processes and be directly involved when appropriate. As new information becomes available, the Committee will review this information, seek input from Basin residents, and submit further recommendations to the provincial and federal governments, if needed. The CRT Local Governments’ Committee will post its recommendations and other documents at www.akblg.ca/content/columbia-river-treaty. For more information contact the Committee Chair, Deb Kozak ([email protected] 250 352-9383) or the Executive Director, Cindy Pearce ([email protected] 250 837-3966). Background Beginning in 2024, either the U.S. or Canada can The Columbia River Treaty (Treaty) was ratified terminate substantial portions of the Treaty, by Canada and the United States (the U.S.) in with at least 10 years’ prior notice. Canada—via 1964, resulting in the construction of three the BC Provincial Government—and the U.S. are dams in Canada—Mica Dam north of both conducting reviews to consider whether to Revelstoke; Hugh Keenleyside Dam near continue, amend or terminate the Treaty. Castlegar; and Duncan Dam north of Kaslo—and Local governments within the Basin have Libby Dam near Libby, Montana. -
Canal Flats Is Half Way Between Cranbrook to Its South and Invermere to Its North
CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Location ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Demographics ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Total Population .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Population Projections .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Age Characteristics................................................................................................................................................ 4 Families & Households .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Family Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Marital Status ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Mobility .................................................................................................................................................................... -
Village of Canal Flats Foreign Direct Investment Action Plan, 2017 1
Village of Canal Flats Foreign Direct Investment Action Plan, 2017 1 Disclaimer for Errors and Omissions: Rynic Communications makes every reasonable effort to ensure the accuracy and validity of the information provided on this Report. However, as information and data is continually changing and this Report is to be used as a general framework for consideration of targeted economic development, Rynic Communications makes no warranties nor accepts liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content or for damages as a result of relying on information contained within this Report. Village of Canal Flats Foreign Direct Investment Action Plan, 2017 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Study Purpose and Background 5 Industrial Land Supply and Demand 9 Sector Analysis: Labour Force Skillset 13 Sector Targeting 28 One Page Foreign Direct Investment Action Plan 33 Next Steps 34 Village of Canal Flats Foreign Direct Investment Action Plan, 2017 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Conducted in 2017, an analysis of Canal Flats’ workforce and business base, in context of broader Columbia Valley industrial land supply and BC Government sector targeting yields recommended Target Economic Sectors amenable to foreign direct investment: Primary Attraction Focus 1) Agrifoods OBJECTIVE – ATTRACT PROCESSING INVESTMENT (NICHE CROPS, GREENHOUSES, FABRICS, AQUACULTURE, DISTILLERY) 2) Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing OBJECTIVE – LEVERAGE BID GROUP METAL FABRICATION ENTERPRISE INTO ADDITIONAL METAL FABRICATION CLUSTER ACTIVITY 3) Forestry – Wood Products Manufacturing Secondary Investment Attraction Focus 4) Mining 5) Transportation Some detailing of these sector opportunities is presented in this Plan. Additional micro foreign direct investment opportunities have been identified as follows: 1) Mountain Mercantile – partial conversion of a former school building into a mixed-use community commercial, residential and activity hub. -
Kootenai River Resident Fish Mitigation: White Sturgeon, Burbot, Native Salmonid Monitoring and Evaluation
KOOTENAI RIVER RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION: WHITE STURGEON, BURBOT, NATIVE SALMONID MONITORING AND EVALUATION Annual Progress Report May 1, 2016 — April 31, 2017 BPA Project # 1988-065-00 Report covers work performed under BPA contract # 68393 IDFG Report Number 08-09 April 2018 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. This report should be cited as follows: Ross et al. 2018. Report for 05/01/2016 – 04/30/2017. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1: KOOTENAI STURGEON MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................... 1 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................3 STUDY SITE ...............................................................................................................................3 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................3 Water -
Ecosystem Classification and Interpretation of the C.3 Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone, Prince Rupert Forest Region, British Columbia
Ecosystem Classification and Interpretation of the c.3 Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone, Prince Rupert Forest Region, British Columbia by J. Pojar', R. Trowbridge', and D. Coates2 'Ministry of Forests 2Ministry of Forests Research Section Silviculture Section Prince Rupert Forest Region Prince Rupert Forest Region Bag 5000 Bag 5000 Smithers. B.C. Smithers, B.C. VOJ 2N0 VOJ 2N0 Province of British Columbia Ministry of Forests ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Numerous individualsassisted in the various phases ofthis report. D.J. Wilford managed theprogram in its first few years. K. Awmack, A. Banner, M. Blouw, W. Chapman, A. Deas, S. Haeussler, D. Holmes, R. Laird, A. Macadam, K. McKeown, M. O'Neill, L. Ricciotti, 6. Robinson, J. Schwab, 0.Wilford, and D. Yolehelped carry out field work. S. Lindeburghand B.M. Geislercontributed tothe Interpretations sections of theguide. J. van Barneveld and 0. Meidingerreviewed the manuscript and provided many usefulsuggestions. G. Bishop, P. Frank, P. Nystedt,and P. Sowden did most ofthe illustrations. F. Boasand J. Godfrey identified some ofthe bryophytes. Final editing and preparationof the report was by W. Taylor and K. McKeown. M. Romeo, and C. Huismanand J. Taekema did the typing andword processing, respectively. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVES ........................................................... 4 3.0 PRINCIPLES AND PHILOSOPHY ............................................ 5 3.1 Ecosystem ...................................................... -
Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1983 Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians Cynthia J. Manning The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Manning, Cynthia J., "Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians" (1983). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5855. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5855 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished m a n u s c r ip t in w h ic h c o p y r ig h t su b s i s t s . Any further r e p r in t in g of it s c o n ten ts must be a ppro ved BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD L ib r a r y Un iv e r s it y of Montana D a te : 1 9 8 3 AN ETHNOHISTORY OF THE KOOTENAI INDIANS By Cynthia J. Manning B.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1978 Presented in partial fu lfillm en t of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1983 Approved by: Chair, Board of Examiners Fan, Graduate Sch __________^ ^ c Z 3 ^ ^ 3 Date UMI Number: EP36656 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. -
(1987): "Tectonomagmatic Evolution of Cenozoic Extension in the North American Cordillera"
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by Frances J Cooper on January 21, 2013 Geological Society, London, Special Publications Tectonomagmatic evolution of Cenozoic extension in the North American Cordillera Brian P. Wernicke, Philip C. England, Leslie J. Sonder and Robert L. Christiansen Geological Society, London, Special Publications 1987, v.28; p203-221. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1987.028.01.15 Email alerting click here to receive free e-mail alerts when service new articles cite this article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or request part of this article Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes © The Geological Society of London 2013 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by Frances J Cooper on January 21, 2013 Tectonomagmatic evolution of Cenozoic extension in the North American Cordillera B.P. Wernicke, R.L. Christiansen, P.C. England & L.J. Sonder SUMMARY: The spatial and temporal distributions of Cenozoic extension and magmatism in the Cordillera suggest that the onset of major crustal extension at a particular latitude was confined to a relatively narrow belt (< 100 km, pre-extension) and followed the onset of intermediate and silicic magmatism by no more than a few million years. Extension began in early Eocene time in southern British Columbia, northern Washington, Idaho and Montana. Farther S, extension began at about the Eocene- Oligocene boundary in the Great Basin and slightly later in the Mojave-Sonora Desert region. The intervening area, at the latitude of Las Vegas, remained quiescent until mid- Miocene time. Compositional and isotopic characteristics of most pre-Miocene magmas are consistent with their containing major components of melted continental crust. -
Imagine Invermere
Imagine Invermere Integrated Community Sustainability Plan May 11, 2011 Prepared by: © 2011, District of Invermere. All Rights Reserved. The preparation of this Integrated Community Sustainability Plan was carried out with assistance from the Green Municipal Fund, a Fund financed by the Government of Canada and administered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. Notwithstanding this support, the views expressed are the personal views of the authors, and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Government of Canada accept no responsibility for them. 2 Imagine Invermere – Integrated Community Sustainability Plan Table of Contents Imagine Invermere Integrated Community Sustainability Plan .................................................................... 5 1.0 Background and Process ................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose of Community Sustainability Planning .................................................................................... 5 1.2 What is an ICSP? .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 The Quick Start Integrated Community Sustainability Plan .................................................................. 5 1.4 Quick Start ICSP - Outcomes .................................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Quick Start ICSP Process ....................................................................................................................... -
The Selkirk Mountains : a Guide for Mountain Climbers and Pilgrims
J Presentee) to ^be Xibrar^ of tbe xaniversit^ of Toronto bs Her"bert B. Sampson, K,C, Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/selkirkmountainsOOwhee THE Selkirk Mountains A Guide for Mountain Climbers and Pilgrims Information by A. O. WHEELER, F.R.G.S., A.C.C., A.C., A.A.C. vo A- Stovel Company, Engravers, Lithographers and Printers, Winnipeg, Man. Arthur O. Wheeler, First President of Alpine Club — CONTENTS Foreword—A. 0. Wlieeler Page 1 One Word More—Elizabeth Parker 2 The Snowy Selkirks—Elizabeth Parker 3-5 CHAPTER I. The Rocky Mountain System—The Selkirks—Early Explorers Later Histor}'—The Railway—Discovery of Rogers Pass—An Alpine Club—Members of British Association Visit the Selkirks, (1884) —Result of Completion of Railway—Government Surveys (1886) —First Scientific Observations of Illecillewaet Glacier Topographical Survey by William Spotswood Green—The Alpine Club, England, and the Swiss Alpine Club—The Appalachian Mountain Club—Triangulation of Railway Belt—Subsequent Mountaineering Pages 6-32 CHAPTER n. Peaks, Passes and Valleys Reached from Glacier—Glacier Park Swiss Guides—Glacier House—Outfits and Ponies—Places and Peaks of Interest Alphabetically Arranged 33-104 CHAPTER m. The Caves of Cheops (Xakimu Caves) —the Valley of the Caves The Approach to the Caves—Formation and Structure—Descrip- tion of Caves—The Mill Bridge Series—The Gorge Series—The Judgment Hall 106-117 CHAPTER IV. •Golden and the Country of the Upper Columbia—Along the Columbia River between Golden and Beavermouth are Several Points of Interest—the Upper Columbia—Travel by Waterway on the Upper Columbia 119-135 CHAPTER V. -
CF News, Dec 3, 2015
Canal Flats Community Newsletter Volume 60, Issue 12 canalfl[email protected] DEC.3rd 2015 The Christmas Bureau of the Columbia Valley is looking for sponsors to help families and individuals over the holiday season. How can you help? 1. Sponsor an individual or family (or families) at a cost of $75 - $200/ family depending on the family size. This means you provide the funds to cover the cost of the grocery gi card and also assemble a wrapped gi box of goodies (shoe- box size). If you are unable to assemble the gi box, there is an opon to provide an addional $25 to cover that cost. 2. Make a flat donaon to the Christmas Bureau. 3. Donate any items that would be suitable to enclose in a gi box, such as candy, baking, toothbrushes, soaps, dish/ face cloths, games, puzzles, crayons, coloring books, scratch ckets, homemade items, etc. These items will then be used by the volunteers to make “goodie” boxes for any unsponsored families. 4. Visit one of the Angel trees at Dairy Queen, Fields or Home Hardware, pick up a tag and purchase a gi for a child. Return wrapped and labeled gi s to the store by Dec 14th email [email protected] to be matched with a family *We are in need of wrapped gi boxes of goodies to include with the grocery gi cards. See suggesons for items under #3* Find us on Facebook COLUMBIA VALLEY CHRISTMAS BUREAU INFORMATION FOR GIFT CARD RECIPIENTS The Christmas Bureau of the Columbia Valley is a non-profit organizaon that provides assistance to individuals & families who need a lile help over the Christmas Season. -
White Paper on COLUMBIA RIVER POST-2024 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE
White Paper on COLUMBIA RIVER POST-2024 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division September 2011 This page intentionally left blank PREFACE The Columbia River, the fourth largest river on the continent as measured by average annual flow, provides more hydropower than any other river in North America. While its headwaters originate in British Columbia, only about 15 percent of the 259,500 square miles of the river’s basin is located in Canada. Yet the Canadian water accounts for about 38 percent of the average annual flow volume, and up to 50 percent of the peak flood waters, that flow on the lower Columbia River between Oregon and Washington. In the 1940s, officials from the United States and Canada began a long process to seek a collaborative solution to reduce the risks of flooding caused by the Columbia River and to meet the postwar demand for energy. That effort resulted in the implementation of the Columbia River Treaty in 1964. This agreement between Canada and the United States called for the cooperative development of water resource regulation in the upper Columbia River Basin. The Columbia River Treaty has provided significant flood control (also termed flood risk management) and hydropower generation benefiting both countries. The Treaty, and subsequent Protocol, include provisions that both expire on September 16, 2024, 60 years after the Treaty’s ratification, and continue throughout the life of the associated facilities whether the Treaty continues or is terminated by either country. This white paper focuses on the flood risk management changes that will occur on that milestone date and satisfies the following purposes: 1. -
Brenda Mayson a Very Deserving 2004 Nakusp Citizen of the Year
April 27, 2005 The Valley Voice Volume 14, Number 8 April 27, 2005 Delivered to every home between Edgewood, Kaslo & South Slocan. Published bi-weekly. “Your independently-owned regional community newspaper serving the Arrow Lakes, Slocan & North Kootenay Lake Valleys.” Brenda Mayson a very deserving 2004 Nakusp Citizen of the Year by Jan McMurray to live, and representatives of the told her story about being Brenda’s moved back, the Dinnings also did, right wind up the evening. All four of her The celebration of Brenda various groups Brenda belongs to. neighbour twice. The first time, Dinning next door to Brenda and Harry. “It was children were there, as well as two Mayson as Nakusp’s Citizen of the Brenda said she was surprised had just moved in and Brenda was at better the second time because Harry nieces and two granddaughters. Year 2004 attracted what several and speechless when she found out the door with a lemon pie. “I was so wasn’t as noisy and the kid finally left,” Susie, Ted’s wife, said that Brenda Rotarians present said was probably she had been named Citizen of the happy to have such a thoughtful she joked. “I hope we’ll be neighbours had been a huge inspiration to her and the biggest crowd the event has ever Year. She thanked all those involved neighbour...but then there was Harry next time, up there,” she said, pointing extended congratulations. Ted said seen. The April 16 banquet and in nominating her, the Rotary Club and Ted,” she lamented jokingly, saying up to heaven.