DOCSLIB.ORG

All My Torrent Downloaders Stopped Working How to Fix Utorrent Not Responding on Windows 10 [Partition Manager] Utorrent Has Over 150 Million Users

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
All My Torrent Downloaders Stopped Working How to Fix Utorrent Not Responding on Windows 10 [Partition Manager] Utorrent Has Over 150 Million Users all my torrent downloaders stopped working How to Fix uTorrent Not Responding on Windows 10 [Partition Manager] uTorrent has over 150 million users. With it on Windows 10, we can share and download torrent files with ease. But some users ran into uTorrent not responding . In this post, MiniTool will discuss the issue and offer feasible fixes to it. Quick Navigation : uTorrent Not Responding. uTorrent is very useful when you want to download Torrents on the website. But some users reported that they have come across uTorrent not responding on Windows 10 . The error message is “It seems like uTorrent is already running but not responding. Please close all uTorrent processes and try again”. Why Is uTorrent Not Responding on Windows 10? The following paragraph lists the possible causes. You might not run the client as administrator . uTorrent has been blocked by Windows Firewall . When an app or feature is blocked by the Windows firewall, you cannot log in to this app and receive an error code (like ESO error 200) or this app not responding, like uTorrent not responding. The configuration files of uTorret have been corrupt . When this happens, the client cannot load all the pre-saved data and cause various issues, including uTorrent not responding on Windows 10. The use of proxy servers affects uTorrent’s behavior . Your downloaded file contains viruses. The installation files of the client get corrupt . Fix 1: Run uTorrent Administrator on Windows 10. The uTorrent client requires elevated access so it can download data without any interruptions from Windows Firewall or issues with accessing the hard drive. How to run uTorrent administrator on Windows 10? Refer to the following tutorial. Step 1: Right-click the uTorrent client and then select the Properties option from the menu. Step 2: On the Properties window, navigate to the Compatibility tab and then check the Run this program as an administrator . Click Apply > OK to save this change. Step 3: Restart your Windows 10 PC and then launch uTorrent again to check if the issue persists. Fix 2: Allow uTorrent Through Windows Firewall. uTorrent not responding cab been caused by the fact that the internet traffic of this app has been blocked by Windows Firewall. So, follow the steps below to check if uTorrent has complete access. Step 1: Type Windows Firewall in Cortana’s search bar and then click the result. Step 2: On the Windows Firewall window, click Allow an app or feature through Windows Firewall . Step 3: On the new window, find uTorrent from the list of entries. Then check both Public and Private network box for the app. Fix 3: Delete uTorrent’s Data from the Configuration Folder. The user configuration files can get corrupt easily. Once this happens, uTorrent will load data and “uTorrent not responding Windows 10” happens. In this case, you need to remove the uTorrent’s data from the application configuration folder. Step 1: Call out the Run window by pressing Windows + R and then type %AppData%\utorrent in the dialogue box and press the Enter key. Step 2: Delete all the contents of the current folder. After that, restart your computer and launch uTorrent again to see if the issue has been removed. Fix 4: Disable Proxy Server. You may enable proxy servers to enjoy faster internet. But the use of proxy servers can conflict with network applications, including uTorrent. Here is the tutorial on how to disable proxy servers. Step 1: Call out the Run window. Input inetcpl.cpl in the dialogue box and then hit the Enter key. Step 2: On the Internet Properties window, navigate to the Connections tab and then click the LAN settings button. Step 3: Uncheck the Use a proxy server for your LAN box and click the OK button to confirm. After disabling proxy servers, relaunch the application to check if the issue is resolved. Fix 5: Scan Your Computer with Windows Defender or Antivirus. When uTorrent not responding happens, it is possible that your computer has been infected with virus. If that is the case, you need to scan your computer. You can do that with Windows built-in tool that is Windows Defender or third-party antivirus, like Bitdefender. Here I show you how to run Windows Defender to scan your computer. Type Windows Defender in Cortana’s search bar and then click the result. On the new window, click Virus & threat protection > Run a new advanced scan . Then select Full Scan and hit the Scan Now button. If all of the above fixes fail to fix uTorrent not responding, you can completely uninstall this application. Power off your computer and power on it. Then fresh-install the latest version of uTorrent and see if the last resort could be helpful. In this post, I would like to recommend some free tools to help you improve Windows 10 experience. What are they? Read the post now. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Reddit. ABOUT THE AUTHOR. Position: Columnist. Vicky is a website editor who has been writing tech articles since she was graduated from university. Most of her articles talk about Windows PC and hard disk issues. Some of her articles also touch on YouTube usage and issues. During her spare time, she likes to spend time reading, watching videos, and sitting on her Yoga mat to relax. Why are none of my torrents downloading? my hard drive is far from full and i don't know what you mean by mounted. check what settings. client settings? router settings? and what logs? McHenryB. Estimable. As uTorrent and BitComet are both Windows clients I deduce that you have posted in the wrong forum. I would try asking the question in one of the Windows forums. Don't even think about trying to use a torrent on a school wireless network; you may end up getting expelled. What is it that you are trying to download? explosiondude369. Estimable. As uTorrent and BitComet are both Windows clients I deduce that you have posted in the wrong forum. I would try asking the question in one of the Windows forums. Don't even think about trying to use a torrent on a school wireless network; you may end up getting expelled. What is it that you are trying to download? Going to school in a couple minutes. Thanks for the heads up. Lol. Can you help me understand what the other guy was saying. McHenryB. Estimable. skittle. Distinguished. Yes I assume you were running Linux. Same sort of requirements apply to windows though: If for some reason the HDD is not mounted (think a removable drive that has been "safely removed") then you cannot write to it. Also if for some reason the torrent clients (or your user) do not have write permission on the drive. Or a myriad of other reasons. Hard to say without looking at the error/log files and knowing how your windows was setup. To expand on blocking torrent traffic, traditionally it is very hard because many traffic are encrypted so packet detection algorithms do not work well. The only reliable method is to block by default all ports other than 43 and 80 for normal web traffic but this still does not stop someone from using torrent over port 43 and 80 and has other undesirable consequences. So I think the problem is unlikely that it is your internet connection. explosiondude369. Estimable. Yes I assume you were running Linux. Same sort of requirements apply to windows though: If for some reason the HDD is not mounted (think a removable drive that has been "safely removed") then you cannot write to it. Also if for some reason the torrent clients (or your user) do not have write permission on the drive. Or a myriad of other reasons. Hard to say without looking at the error/log files and knowing how your windows was setup. To expand on blocking torrent traffic, traditionally it is very hard because many traffic are encrypted so packet detection algorithms do not work well. The only reliable method is to block by default all ports other than 43 and 80 for normal web traffic but this still does not stop someone from using torrent over port 43 and 80 and has other undesirable consequences. So I think the problem is unlikely that it is your internet connection. how might one go about blocking all ports but 43 and 80? Also unfortunately I am using windows so if that is out of your area of expertise that is fine but if not I have uncovered some more info. I read somewhere to try plugging directly into modem. Now in bitcomet the listening port is no loner blocked. Yay. but downloads still don't work. Boo. Although I was looking through my windows firewall advanced security setting a stumbled upon my inboud and outbound rules. A bunch of these rules said windows peer to peer collaboration (some had tcp at the end and I forgot to check for udp but I assume it is there). Anyways those are disabled. should I enable them. all trackers listed "not working" #8397. Hi everyone, I'm hoping to get some help with a problem across all torrent files, they all have public trackers added and every single one shows as not working. This has been happening for the last few weeks but they still manage to connect to DHT, [PeX> and [LSD] Here is a snapshot - I have setup to have approx 50 public trackers auto added by qbittorrent and not a single one shows as working, across the board. Checking the logs here is the listening information: 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - UPnP / NAT-PMP support [ON] 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - qBittorrent is successfully listening on interface 0.0.0.0 port: UDP/62222 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - qBittorrent is successfully listening on interface :: port: TCP/62222 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - qBittorrent is successfully listening on interface 0.0.0.0 port: TCP/62222 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - qBittorrent is successfully listening on interface 0.0.0.0 port: UDP/62222 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - qBittorrent is successfully listening on interface :: port: TCP_SSL/4433 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - qBittorrent is successfully listening on interface :: port: TCP/62222 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - qBittorrent is successfully listening on interface 0.0.0.0 port: TCP_SSL/4433 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - qBittorrent is successfully listening on interface 0.0.0.0 port: TCP/62222 12/02/2018 8:35 PM - Options were saved successfully.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ஜ Torrent Is Not Seeding ஜ Скачать: Torrent Is Not Seeding
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ Torrent is not seeding ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Скачать: ➤ Torrent is not seeding Download: ➤ Torrent is not seeding ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ Torrent is not seeding ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ . Torrent is not seeding We are a thriving community dedicated to helping users old and new understand and use torrents. I think is stable enough. A peer or downloader becomes a seed when it starts uploading the already downloaded content for other peers to download from. Do not send - not taken into account. Please check the Accepted clients list. When it completes you switch to a torrent is not seeding and dedicate that stream to simply uploading. My upload speed limit should be all I need instead of limiting upload slots. Then add the port you selected in step 5. Torrent files contain information like the file list, sizes, pieces, etc. Every piece received is first checked against the hash. If yes, please state the libtorrent version used by your distro. However, whether to seed or not, or how much to seed, depends on the availability of downloaders and the choice of the peer at the seeding end. I tried raising my connection limits to higher and higher numbers currently at 1000, 500, 500, 500 I have a static port so I can forward it. For legal torrents try. I advice you to use only one active seeding torrent when capturing. Current settings: DHT: off PeX: off Local peer discovery: on Anonymous mode: off Max downloads: 5 Max uploads: 7 Max active: 12 Do not count slow torrents in these limits: on no see ratio limits set. Each seed adds 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Locality in Swarms
    13-th IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing The hidden locality in swarms John S. Otto and Fabian´ E. Bustamante Northwestern University {jotto,fabianb}@eecs.northwestern.edu Abstract—People use P2P systems such as BitTorrent to share We overcome the challenges of local peer discovery by an unprecedented variety and amount of content with others leveraging diurnal patterns and applying client-side techniques around the world. The random connection pattern used by to improve overall peer discovery. BitTorrent has been shown to result in reduced performance for users and costly cross-ISP traffic. Although several client-side Through an analysis of swarm population dynamics, we systems have been proposed to improve the locality of BitTorrent show that locality is present in swarms – if one looks at the traffic, their effectiveness is limited by the availability of local right time. For popular content swarms, 50% of ISPs seen in peers. the swarm have at least five local peers online during the ISP’s We show that sufficient locality is present in swarms – if peak hour. During an ISP’s peak hour, the relative fraction of one looks at the right time. We find that 50% of ISPs have at least five local peers online during the ISP’s peak hour, local peers – and therefore the local peer discovery rate – is typically in the evening, compared to only 20% of ISPs during typically 50% higher than the daily average. the median hour. To better discover these local peers, we show We evaluate client-side techniques that boost the peer how to increase the overall peer discovery rate by over two orders discovery rate by two orders of magnitude, enabling peers of magnitude using client-side techniques: leveraging additional to quickly discover online local peers.
    [Show full text]
  • User Manual - Documentationcase - Help3:11-Cv-00651-IEG - Bittorrent - Delivering The-JMA World's Documentcontent 26-1 Filed 12/05/11 Page 2 of 4 11/30/11 3:15 PM
    Case 3:11-cv-00651-IEG -JMA Document 26-1 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT A User Manual - DocumentationCase - Help3:11-cv-00651-IEG - BitTorrent - Delivering the-JMA World's DocumentContent 26-1 Filed 12/05/11 Page 2 of 4 11/30/11 3:15 PM English Get Started Features Community Help Free Download Peers Help BitTorrent User Manual Appendix A: The BitTorrent Interface Main Window Detailed Info Pane FAQ Peers The Peers tab is where you'll find information about all the peers you are currently connected to on Videos & Guides the selected torrent. The following is a description of each column: IP displays the peer's IP address and the flag of the country they're from. If Resolve IPs is enabled, Forums the country flag and hostname will be displayed instead. % displays the approximate percent of the torrent job the peer has completed. User Manual Client displays the BitTorrent client that the peer reports it is using. If BitTorrent suspects the client Chapter 01: Introduction to of spoofing (faking) its client ID, it will note it as such. BitTorrent Debug displays information that might be useful in debugging problems. Chapter 02: Basic Guides Down Speed is the averaged speed at which you are downloading data from the peer. Chapter 03: Advanced Guides Downloaded is the amount of data you have downloaded from the peer since the torrent job was Appendix A: The BitTorrent added. Interface Flags displays various letters, each carrying a special meaning about the state of the connection: Appendix B: Advanced ?: your client unchoked the peer but
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of Ipv6
    Special Publication 800-119 Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of IPv6 Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Sheila Frankel Richard Graveman John Pearce Mark Rooks NIST Special Publication 800-119 Guidelines for the Secure Deployment of IPv6 Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Sheila Frankel Richard Graveman John Pearce Mark Rooks C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 December 2010 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Dr. Patrick D. Gallagher, Director GUIDELINES FOR THE SECURE DEPLOYMENT OF IPV6 Reports on Computer Systems Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems. This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-119 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 800-119, 188 pages (Dec. 2010) Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Stack for Decentralized Mobile Services
    Technology Stack for Decentralized Mobile Services Matouš Skála Technology Stack for Decentralized Mobile Services by Matouš Skála to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Monday August 31, 2020 at 3:00 PM. Student number: 4893964 Project duration: November 15, 2019 – August 31, 2020 Thesis committee: Dr.ir. J.A. Pouwelse, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. J.S. Rellermeyer, TU Delft Dr. N. Yorke-Smith, TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Preface When I was choosing my thesis topic, I originally came up with an idea of designing a decen- tralized social network. After realizing how ambitious that goal was, I later decided to focus on more fundamental issues first and create a library that would allow for building any de- centralized applications, running purely on an overlay network consisting of smartphones. Rather than reinventing the wheel, I took inspiration from an existing networking library de- veloped at TU Delft over the last decade and created its wire-compatible implementation in Kotlin. Interestingly, in the end, I have even implemented a trivial social network to demon- strate the usage of the library, returning back to the original idea. I would like to thank my supervisor Johan Pouwelse for an endless stream of fresh ideas and valuable feedback, and to PhD students of the Delft Blockchain Lab for numerous coffee meetings and for serving me as a walking documentation of the existing codebase. Matouš Skála Prague,
    [Show full text]
  • CSC 634: Networks Programming
    CSC 634: Networks Programming Lecture 08: Peer to Peer Computing Instructor: Haidar M. Harmanani Traditional Internet Services Model § Client-server Many clients, 1 (or more) server(s) Web servers, DNS, file downloads, video streaming § Problems Scalability: how many users can a server support? o What happens when user traffic overload servers? o Limited resources (bandwidth, CPU, storage) Reliability: if # of servers is small, what happens when they break, fail, get disconnected, are mismanaged by humans? Efficiency: if your users are spread across the entire globe, how do you make sure you answer their requests quickly? Spring 2018 Network Programming 2 The Alternative: Peer-to-Peer § A simple idea Users bring their own resources to the table A cooperative model: clients = peers = servers § The benefits Scalability: # of “servers” grows with users o BYOR: bring your own resources (storage, CPU, B/W) Reliability: load spread across many peers o Probability of them all failing is very low… Efficiency: peers are distributed o Peers can try and get service from nearby peers Spring 2018 Network Programming 3 The Peer-to-Peer Challenge § What are the key components for leveraging P2P? Communication: how do peers talk to each other Service/data location: how do peers know who to talk to § New reliability challenges Network reachability, i.e. dealing with NATs Dealing with churn, i.e. short peer uptimes § What about security? Malicious peers and cheating The Sybil attack Spring 2018 Network Programming 4 Centralized Approach
    [Show full text]
  • Maximum Number of Utorrent
    Maximum number of utorrent click here to download Sky Chan is correct on the settings location, but I think you are asking what those settings should be set to. What the maximum number of active torrents should be set to depends on the speed of your internet connection, particularly the upload speed. Spreading your upload effectively will help your download speeds. But I have 19 active torrents and 9 active downloads (status is "downloading" or "seeding"). Because uTorrent is switching from one torrent to another, I get "torrents limit reached" errors. You really should queue downloads and seeds in respect to the following options: Maximum Maximum number of active torrents overrided (uT The number of connections is the most essential part of the entire optimization process, as it controls the global maximum number of connections, the maximum number of connected peers per torrent and the number of upload slots per torrent. Power users are recommended to use a /50/4 configuration. There are certain ways to tweak your uTorrent settings and optimize your connection for maximum download speeds. BitTorrent is a P2P protocol. Unlike HTTP there is no centralized server distributing data. Instead, files and folders are stored on regular PCs just like yours. Recommended: Top 5 Torrent. This video shows how to put a limit on the maximum no. of active torrents in uTorrent/ Bittorrent. Linnet's How To _ Remember to like and subscribe See all my videoes in playlist / categories here https://www. The Maximum number of connections is the most important part to increase uTorrent download speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bittorrent and Bittyrant CS 344G 2/9/2015 Gregory D
    BitTorrent and BitTyrant CS 344G 2/9/2015 Gregory D. Hill BitTorrent Overview Download .torrent file or use magnet URI to get file hash, required metadata Get partial list of peers from Tracker or Kademlia-based DHT Download file from peers following peer protocol (uses TCP) 10 message types described in following slides keep-alive choke/unchoke Interested/not interested have bitfield request piece cancel Basic BitTorrent Protocol Handshake with peer, after send bitfield(length, bitfield) message which has a bit for each piece of the file representing whether that peer has that piece or not have(piece index) message – tell a peer you have piece x request(piece index, byte offset, length) to a peer hopefully reciprocated by a piece(piece index, byte offset, data) which can be aborted with a cancel(piece index, byte offset, length) Send interested() to a peer that has data you want and undo this by sending them not interested() Piece Selection First piece: choose at random until a complete piece downloaded Normal: Rarest First, try to download piece fewest peers have Endgame: on last pieces, request all subpieces left from all peers, send cancels to others when data arrives BitTorrent Choking Refuse to upload to, or choke, all but a few (commonly 4) peers Upload even share to these unchoked peers Prefer to give to peers who upload most to you (tit-for-tat) Every 10 seconds decide which mutually interested peer to unchoke based on best rolling 20 second average of download rate from peers If no reciprocation from an
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Investigation of P2P Cloud Storage Services and Backbone For
    Forensic investigation of P2P cloud storage services and backbone for IoT networks : BitTorrent Sync as a case study Yee Yang, T, Dehghantanha, A, Choo, R and Yang, LK http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.08.020 Title Forensic investigation of P2P cloud storage services and backbone for IoT networks : BitTorrent Sync as a case study Authors Yee Yang, T, Dehghantanha, A, Choo, R and Yang, LK Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/40497/ Published Date 2016 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Note: This is authors accepted copy – for final article please refer to International Journal of Computers & Electrical Engineering Forensic Investigation of P2P Cloud Storage: BitTorrent Sync as a Case Study 1 2 3 1 Teing Yee Yang , Ali Dehghantanha , Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo , Zaiton Muda 1 Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia 2 The School of Computing, Science & Engineering, Newton Building, University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom 3 Information Assurance Research Group, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Abstract Cloud computing has been regarded as the technology enabler for the Internet of Things (IoT).
    [Show full text]
  • CS 3700 Networks and Distributed Systems
    CS 3700 Networks and Distributed Systems Lecture 18: Peer-to-Peer Systems Revised 3/23/13 2 Outline ❑ Peer-to-Peer Overview ❑ Example: Bittorrent ❑ µTP: Micro Transport Protocol ❑ Cheating on BitTorrent Traditional Internet Services Model 3 Client-server ! Many clients, 1 (or more) server(s) ! Web servers, DNS, file downloads, video streaming Problems ! Scalability: how many users can a server support? ■ What happens when user traffic overload servers? ■ Limited resources (bandwidth, CPU, storage) ! Reliability: if # of servers is small, what happens when they break, fail, get disconnected, are mismanaged by humans? ! Efficiency: if your users are spread across the entire globe, how do you make sure you answer their requests quickly? The Alternative: Peer-to-Peer 4 A simple idea ! Users bring their own resources to the table ! A cooperative model: clients = peers = servers The benefits ! Scalability: # of “servers” grows with users ■ BYOR: bring your own resources (storage, CPU, B/W) ! Reliability: load spread across many peers ■ Probability of them all failing is very low… ! Efficiency: peers are distributed ■ Peers can try and get service from nearby peers The Peer-to-Peer Challenge 5 What are the key components for leveraging P2P? ! Communication: how do peers talk to each other ! Service/data location: how do peers know who to talk to New reliability challenges ! Network reachability, i.e. dealing with NATs ! Dealing with churn, i.e. short peer uptimes What about security? ! Malicious peers and cheating ! The Sybil attack Centralized
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Caching Using the Htcondor Cached Derek J
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Holland Computing Center -- Faculty Publications Holland Computing Center Summer 7-27-2015 Distributed Caching Using the HTCondor CacheD Derek J. Weitzel University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Brian Bockelman University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] David Swanson University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hollandfacpub Part of the Numerical Analysis and Scientific omputC ing Commons Weitzel, Derek J.; Bockelman, Brian; and Swanson, David, "Distributed Caching Using the HTCondor CacheD" (2015). Holland Computing Center -- Faculty Publications. 4. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hollandfacpub/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Holland Computing Center at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Holland Computing Center -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Distributed Caching Using the HTCondor CacheD Derek Weitzel, Brian Bockelman, and David Swanson Computer Science and Engineering University of Nebraska – Lincoln Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 Email: [email protected] Abstract—A batch processing job in a distributed system has Bosco allowed campus researchers to submit high throughput three clear steps, stage-in, execution, and stage-out. As data sizes jobs to high performance clusters. We extend Bosco to include have increased, the stage-in time has also increased. In order data caching and novel data transfer methods. to optimize stage-in time for shared inputs, we propose the CacheD, a caching mechanism for high throughput computing.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Bandwidth Attacks in a Bittorrent Swarm
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Adamsky, Florian (2016). Analysis of bandwidth attacks in a bittorrent swarm. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City, University of London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16158/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] florian e. w. adamsky ANALYSISOFBANDWIDTHATTACKSINA BITTORRENTSWARM ANALYSISOFBANDWIDTHATTACKSINABITTORRENT SWARM florian e. w. adamsky A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Information Engineering) School of Mathematics, Computer Science & Engineering City University London August 2016 – version 1.1 Florian E. W. Adamsky: Analysis of Bandwidth Attacks in a BitTorrent Swarm, A thesis submitted for the degree of, Doctor of Philosophy (Information Engineering), c August 2016 supervisors: Prof. Dr. Muttukrishnan Rajarajan Dr. Syed Ali Khayam local supervisor: Prof. Dr. Rudolf Jäger Ohana means family. Family means nobody gets left behind, or forgotten.
    [Show full text]