DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecology Assessment Report 161FTY1867

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecology Assessment Report 161FTY1867 Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals - Team Leader. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals - Team Leader. Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-0044 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 85 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy Ecology Assessment Report 161FTY1867 Table of Contents REPORT ....................................................................................................... 1 1. Definitions & abbreviations ......................................................................... 6 1.1. Definitions ............................................................................................. 6 1.2. Abbreviations .......................................................................................... 6 1.3. Document references ................................................................................ 7 2. Introduction ........................................................................................... 8 3. Site context ............................................................................................ 9 3.1. Location ................................................................................................ 9 3.2. Land Use ............................................................................................... 9 3.3. Geology ................................................................................................. 9 3.4. Climate ................................................................................................. 9 4. Methodology .......................................................................................... 10 4.1. Desktop and Literature Review .................................................................... 10 4.2. Field Survey........................................................................................... 10 4.2.1.Vegetation Community Survey .................................................................... 10 4.2.2.Habitat Survey ...................................................................................... 11 4.2.3.Threatened Flora and Fauna Survey ............................................................. 11 4.2.4.Exotic Flora and Fauna Survey .................................................................... 12 4.2.5.Disturbance Survey ................................................................................. 12 4.2.6.Survey Limitations .................................................................................. 12 5. Results and Discussion .............................................................................. 13 5.1. Desktop and Literature Review .................................................................... 13 5.1.1.Matters of National Environmental Significance ............................................... 13 5.1.2.Nature Conservation Act .......................................................................... 17 5.1.3.Environmentally Sensitive Areas ................................................................. 18 5.1.4.Other Environmental Values ...................................................................... 19 5.2. Field Survey........................................................................................... 20 5.2.1.Matters of National Environmental Significance ............................................... 21 5.2.2.Nature Conservation Act .......................................................................... 26 5.2.3.Environmentally Sensitive Areas ................................................................. 32 5.2.4.Other Environmental Values ...................................................................... 34 5.2.5.Weeds and Pest Fauna ............................................................................. 35 5.2.6.Disturbance .......................................................................................... 37 6. Conclusion ............................................................................................ 38 6.1. Conclusion ............................................................................................ 38 Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-0044 Revision: 0 Page 3 of 85 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy Ecology Assessment Report 161FTY1867 7. References ............................................................................................ 40 Appendix A Results of EPBC Act protected matters search tool .................................... 44 Appendix B Results of wildlife online search .......................................................... 51 Appendix C Map of DEHP REs (biodiversity status), EH and HVR identified for the Site ......... 63 Appendix D Results of DEHP referable wetland search .............................................. 64 Appendix E Map of field survey sites at the Site ...................................................... 67 Appendix F Map of EPBC Act TECs known to occur at the Site ...................................... 68 Appendix G Map of EVNT flora recorded at the Site during field survey .......................... 69 Appendix H Map of EPBC Act migratory species recorded at the Site during field survey ...... 70 Appendix I Flora recorded at the Site during field survey ........................................... 71 Appendix J Fauna recorded at the Site during field survey ......................................... 79 Appendix K Map of other significant fauna recorded at the Site during field survey ............ 83 Appendix L Map of other significant flora, including TAR plants recorded at the Site during field survey ................................................................................................. 83 Appendix M Map of ground-truthed RE polygons at the Site......................................... 83 Appendix N Map of ground-truthed water features at the Site ..................................... 83 Appendix O Map of declared weeds recorded at the Site during field survey .................... 83 Appendix P Non-native flora recorded at the Site during field survey ............................. 84 Appendix Q Map of pest fauna recorded at the Site during field survey .......................... 85 List of Tables Table 1: Definitions ....................................................................................................... 6 Table 2: Abbreviations .................................................................................................... 6 Table 3: Associated Document References ............................................................................ 7 Table 4: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for TECs predicted to occur at the Site and their likelihood of occurrence ................................................................................................ 13 Table 5: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for listed flora species predicted to occur at the Site and their likelihood of occurrence .............................................................................. 14 Table 6: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for listed fauna predicted to occur at the Site and their likelihood of occurrence ................................................................................... 14 Table 7: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for migratory species predicted to occur at the Site and their likelihood of occurrence .............................................................................. 15 Table 8: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for marine species predicted to occur at the Site and their likelihood of occurrence ................................................................................... 16 Table 9: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for WoNS and other invasive non-native flora predicted to occur at the Site and their likelihood of occurrence ............................................. 16 Table 10: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for pest fauna species predicted to occur at the Site and their likelihood of occurrence .............................................................................. 17 Table 11: NC Act wildlife online search results for listed flora at the Site ................................... 18 Table 12: NC Act wildlife online search results for listed fauna at the Site .................................. 18 Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-0044 Revision: 0 Page 4 of 85 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Relevance of Binary, Mosaic and Continuous Landscape Conceptualisations to Reptiles in Regenerating Dryland Landscapes
    Testing the relevance of binary, mosaic and continuous landscape conceptualisations to reptiles in regenerating dryland landscapes Melissa J. Bruton1, Martine Maron1,2, Noam Levin1,3, Clive A. McAlpine1,2 1The University of Queensland, Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, St Lucia, Australia 4067 2The University of Queensland, ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, St. Lucia, Australia 4067 3Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Geography, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel, 91905 Corresponding author: [email protected] Ph: (+61) 409 875 780 The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0157-9 Abstract: Context: Fauna distributions are assessed using discrete (binary and mosaic) or continuous conceptualisations of the landscape. The value of the information derived from these analyses depends on the relevance of the landscape representation (or model) used to the landscape and fauna of interest. Discrete representations dominate analyses of landscape context in disturbed and regenerating landscapes; however within-patch variation suggests that continuous representations may help explain the distribution of fauna in such landscapes. Objectives: We tested the relevance of binary, mosaic, and continuous conceptualisations of landscape context to reptiles in regenerating dryland landscapes. Methods: For each of thirteen reptile groups, we compared the fit of models consisting of one landscape composition and one landscape heterogeneity variable for each of six landscape representations (2 x binary, 2 x mosaic, and 2 x continuous), at three buffer distances. We used Akaike weights to assess the relative support for each model. Maps were created from Landsat satellite images.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Allocasuarina Species
    Some Allocasuarina Species This note is dedicated to Tony Fearnside -(28th June 1934-18th — April 2020) Forester, who was interested in such things to the end. This weeks offering concludes the notes on Casuarinas. It is of course about the Genus Allocasuarina. All are Australian species. They are an effulgence of taxonomist delight, spread throughout the country in some cases extensively but mostly confined to small specialised sites. The comments made in the introduction to the last note apply here namely that I have not included references as it is a quickly written piece for the times. There are no photographs as they are easily obtained by the reader on the net using your favourite search engine. Something you are encouraged to do if you are looking for something to do at this rather frustrating time which, it seems, may be easing soon - or not as we go into winter. Allocasuarina There are 59 species and a total of 68 if one is including the subspecies in the Genus which are comprehensively covered in the Flora of Australia v3. L.A.S. Johnson and K.L. Wilson divided the Allocasuarina into 14 Sections. One can only admire the dedication in sorting out a very complex Genus spread over the continent in mostly small areas. There were many taxonomists identifying individual species from the1840s to the period of Johnson and Wilson to be sorted out and incorporated or rejected. I have created a spreadsheet of all the species in the Flora of Australia which can be sorted by maximum recorded height, Section or State where they are found.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on CASUARINACEAE II L.A.S. Johnson
    J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 6(1) 73-87 (1982) NOTES ON CASUARINACEAE II L.A.S. Johnson National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, N.S.W. 2000 Abstract AllocasuarinaL. Johnson, gen. nov., is recognised as separate fromCasuarina sens. strict.and 40 combinations at specific and subspecific level are made under thenew genus.Casuarina grandis and C. L. Johnson oligodonL. Johnson are described together with a new subspecies,C.oligodon ssp. abbreviataL. Johnson, and C.equisetifolia ssp. incana(Benth.) L. Johnson,sial. nov.InGyinnostoma, made for 11 species. combinations are This paper formally establishes thenew genus Allocasuarina, together with new combinations for all those described taxa that will be recognisedin the revision of Casuarinaceae at present being completed. Variousnew taxa will be described therein, but it is necessary to provide descriptions here fortwo species and a subspecies that will be treated in a booklet on uses of Casuarina and alliedgenera being prepared as a result of the International Casuarina Workshopheld in Canberra in August, 1981. The publication of Allocasuarina will permituse of this name in the forthcoming new edition of Flora of South Australia, Part II. Detaileddiscussion of generic and infra- generic relationships and distinctions within the familymust await publication of the revision, as must distributional details, keys, illustrations,nomenclatural discussion, and listing of synonyms and collections. The family comprises four genera: GymnostomaL. Johnson (Johnson 1980), "genus C" to be described (confined to Malesia), CasuarinaAdans. s. str., and Allocasuarina L. Johnson. They are briefly discussed by Johnson and Wilson(1981), and our account of the family in Morley and Toelken (in press)gives a synopsis of the three genera native in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Referral of Proposed Action Form
    Referral of proposed action What is a referral? The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the EPBC Act) provides for the protection of the environment, especially matters of national environmental significance (NES). Under the EPBC Act, a person must not take an action that has, will have, or is likely to have a significant impact on any of the matters of NES without approval from the Australian Government Environment Minister or the Minister’s delegate. (Further references to ‘the Minister’ in this form include references to the Minister’s delegate.) To obtain approval from the Environment Minister, a proposed action should be referred. The purpose of a referral is to obtain a decision on whether your proposed action will need formal assessment and approval under the EPBC Act. Your referral will be the principal basis for the Minister’s decision as to whether approval is necessary and, if so, the type of assessment that will be undertaken. These decisions are made within 20 business days, provided sufficient information is provided in the referral. Who can make a referral? Referrals may be made by or on behalf of a person proposing to take an action, the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth agency, a state or territory government, or agency, provided that the relevant government or agency has administrative responsibilities relating to the action. When do I need to make a referral? A referral must be made for actions that are likely to have a significant impact on the following matters protected by Part 3 of the EPBC
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Fauna Assessment
    Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project EnvironmentalEnvironmental Values Assessment Assessment APPENDIX E Terrestrial Fauna Assessment Cameby Downs Continued Operation Project Terrestrial Fauna Assessment May 2018 Syntech Resources Pty Ltd ecology / vegetation / wildlife / aquatic ecology / GIS Executive summary The Cameby Downs Mine is owned and operated by Syntech Resources Pty Ltd (Syntech) and is managed by Yancoal Australia Ltd (Yancoal). Syntech are considering expanding their operation area as part of the Cameby Downs Continued Operations Project (the Project) and an environmental values statement is being prepared to accompany a major Environmental Authority Amendment application. Syntech commissioned Ecosure Pty Ltd (Ecosure) to undertake terrestrial fauna field surveys and ecological assessments to address the minimum requirements in the Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage (DEHP) Information Request for an Amendment Application for an Environmental Authority. To supplement previous fauna surveys undertaken over the last decade, Ecosure undertook preliminary surveys and targeted surveys in July 2016. More comprehensive surveys followed in October 2016. Overall, six detailed trapping sites, 50 observational surveys and 56 targeted surveys were undertaken across the study area to determine the likelihood of occurrence of species listed as conservation significant species under State legislation and/ or threatened under Commonwealth legislation. A total of five conservation significant species have been recorded during field surveys (including previous surveys) conducted in the study area. These were: • koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) • glossy black-cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami lathami) • grey snake (Hemiaspis damelii) • short-beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) • yakka skink (Egernia rugosa) (during previous surveys only). A total of 192 species were recorded during the field surveys, including 13 amphibians, 101 birds, 25 mammals and 26 reptiles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Faunal Values Within and Adjacent EPC 1029, Styx Basin, Central-East Queensland
    A preliminary assessment of faunal values within and adjacent EPC 1029, Styx Basin, central-east Queensland ) Prepared for Yeats Consulting Engineers by Ed Meyer, Ecological Consultant,S Luscombe Street, Runcorn QLD 4113 ([email protected]) Conditions of use This report may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned. The use of this report, or part thereof, for any other reason or purpose is prohibited without the written consent of the author. Front cover: Fauna recorded from EPC 1029 during March 2011 surveys. Clockwise from upper left: ornamental snake (Denisonia maculata); squatter pigeon (southern race) (Geophaps scripta scripta); metallic snake-eyed skink (Cryptoblepharus metal/icus); and eastern sedgefrog (Litoria tal/ax). ©Edward Meyer 2011 5 Luscombe Street, Runcorn QLD 4113 E-mail:[email protected] Version 2 _ 3 August 2011 2 Table of contents 1. Summary 4 2. Background 6 Description of study area 6 Nomenclature 6 Abbreviations and acronyms 7 3. Methodology 9 General approach 9 ) Desktop assessment 9 Likelihood of occurrence assessments 10 Field surveys 11 Survey conditions 15 Survey limitations 15 4. Results 17 Desktop assessment findings 17 Likelihood of occurrence assessments 17 Field survey results -fauna 20 Field survey results - fauna habitat 22 Habitat for conservation significant species 28 ) 5. Summary and conclusions 37 6. References 38 Appendix A: Fauna previously recorded from Desktop Assessment Study Area 41 Appendix B: likelihood of occurrence assessments for conservation significant fauna 57 Appendix C: March 2011 survey results 73 Appendix D: Habitat photos 85 Appendix E: Habitat assessment proforma 100 3 1. Summary The faunal values of land within and adjacent Exploration Permit for Coal (EPe) 1029 were investigated by way of desktop review of existing information as well as field surveys carried out in late March 201l.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Biological Soil Crust Communities in Callitris Glaucophylla Woodlands - 271
    Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 271-280, 2006 © IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala. - Structure of biological soil crust communities in Callitris glaucophylla woodlands - 271 Structure of biological soil crust communities in Callitris glaucophylla woodlands of New South Wales, Australia Thompson, Wendy A.1; Eldridge, David J.2,* & Bonser, Stephen P.1,3 1School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Fax +61 293851558; E-mail [email protected]; 2Department of Natural Resources, c/o School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of NSW, Sydney, 2052 NSW, Australia; 3E-mail [email protected]; *Corresponding author; E-mail [email protected] Abstract Introduction Question: What is the nature of the relationships between cover, diversity and abundance of biological soil crusts, cover Studies of the impacts of changes in ecosystem and diversity of vascular plants, and annual rainfall, soil texture structure and function on woodland biota have tended to and forestry practices in Callitris glaucophylla woodlands? focus on the more visible components of the ecosystem Location: Arid and semi-arid Callitris glaucophylla-domi- nated woodlands of eastern Australia. such as mammals, birds, reptiles and vascular plants Methods: We documented soil crust-forming mosses, lichens (e.g. Lindenmayer et al. 1999; Fischer & Lindenmayer and liverworts at 83 woodland sites along a gradient of declin- 2002; Wethered & Lawes 2003). An often overlooked, ing rainfall. Linear and non-linear regression were used to but functionally important taxonomic group of organ- examine relationships between soil crust species and attributes isms is the non-vascular plant group (see Pharo & Beattie of vascular plant communities, and a similarity matrix (species 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Condition Assessment for Grazing Lands
    finalreportp Project code: NBP.231 Teresa Eyre1, Annie Kelly1, Daniel Ferguson1, Col Paton2, Michael Mathieson1, Prepared by: Giselle Whish2, Melanie Venz1, Jane Hamilton2, Jian Wang1, Rosalie Buck1 and Luke Hogan1 1. Department of Environment and Resource Management 2. Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation Date published: October 2011 ISBN: 9781741916393 PUBLISHED BY Meat & Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 Biodiversity Condition Assessment for Grazing Lands Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. Biodiversity Condition Assessment for Grazing Lands Abstract The primary purpose of the project was to develop and test a prototype procedure for the assessment of biodiversity condition of grazing lands. This would then complement the grazing land condition assessment framework used by the Grazing Land Management education package, which promotes sustainable management of grazed lands in northern Australia. To do this, comprehensive sampling of fauna, flora, habitat features and grazing land condition indicators was conducted at 171 sites. The sample sites were stratified across three different land types of southern Queensland (soft mulga, poplar box on alluvial and brigalow belah scrub), and broad condition states.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Innamincka Regional Reserve 1988-1998
    4¡ A Review of :,z. ' 1 6_y .R ,.R , . ,s ' M. t _ .,}Y JO ° ,. w-. , . , ,,,,, . - k f.,er4 s ; ,'i ` SY ; ¡ ' ' ; °`" : Department for Environment Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs Government of South Australia A Review of Innamincka Regional Reserve 1988 1998 Department for Environment Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs Government of South Australia This review has been prepared and adopted in pursuance to section 34A of the National Parks and Wildlife Act, 1972 -81 Published by the Department for Environment. Heringe and Aboriginal Affairs Adelaide, South Australia December1998 O Depanmen fo Environment. Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs ISBN: 0 7308 5854 5 Prepared by North Region Heritage & Biodiversiry Department for Environment, Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs FIS: 15889 Front Cover Photograph Peter Canty Copyright Planning SA. Department for Transport, Urban Planning and da Arts 1997. All rights reserved. AB works and information displayed in Figures 1.3 and 13 are mbjen ro copyright. For the reproduction or publication beyond that permitted by the Copyright Aa 1968 (Cwlrh) written permission mort be vaughr from the Department. Although every effort has been made ro ensure the accuracy of the information displayed in Figures 2.3 and 13 the Deparunene, its agents, officers and employees make no representations, either aquas or implied. that the information displayed is mauve or fir for any purpose and expressly disclaims all liability for loss or damage arising from reliance upon the information displayed. Department for Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Wimmera, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]