Our Aim: Our Method

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Our Aim: Our Method For a Solidarity workers’ government For social ownership of the banks and industry No 339 8 October 2014 30p/80p www.workersliberty.org Our aim: END LOW PAY See page 5 Our method: INDUSTRIAL ACTION March with TUC 18 October • Britain needs a pay rise! 2 NEWS What is the Alliance Rousseff wins first round in for Workers’ Liberty? Today one class, the working class, lives by selling its labour power to another, the capitalist class, which owns the means of production. Brazil’s elections Society is shaped by the capitalists’ relentless drive to increase their wealth. Capitalism causes poverty, unemployment, the By Raquel Palmeira as the others”. Many trade blighting of lives by overwork, imperialism, the unions actively campaigned destruction of the environment and much else. In the first round of the Against the accumulated wealth and power of the against Neves, implicitly Brazilian presidential elec - calling for a vote for Rouss - capitalists, the working class has one weapon: tions the incumbent Dilma eff as a less bad option. solidarity. Rousseff (Workers Party) The Alliance for Workers’ Liberty aims to build Rousseff has a history of took 41.1% of the vote solidarity through struggle so that the working class can overthrow ahead of Aecio Neves some dialogue with the capitalism. We want socialist revolution: collective ownership of labour movement. industry and services, workers’ control and a democracy much fuller (pro-business social-dem - ocratic party) on 34.2%. Neves represents a neolib - than the present system, with elected representatives recallable at any eral agenda, and has called time and an end to bureaucrats’ and managers’ privileges. We fight for the labour movement to break with “social partnership” They will now face each for new laws to curb the and assert working-class interests militantly against the bosses. other in a second round of rights of unions. Our priority is to work in the workplaces and trade unions, voting on 26 October. Neves is anti-choice and supporting workers’ struggles, producing workplace bulletins, helping Socialist Party candidate anti-same-sex marriage. organise rank-and-file groups. Marina Silva got only 21.3%. However, despite Rousseff We are also active among students and in many campaigns and This is surprising, as Silva Most expected a run off between Silva and Rousseff having a history of being alliances. had been favourite to win at more pro-choice and for one point. However it is un - marriage equality, she has We stand for: usual for a candidate to her “new politics”, which maintain votes. Many peo - not taken up these issues Independent working-class representation in politics. come close to challenging ● while having a large green ple demanding political during this election cam - ● A workers’ government, based on and accountable to the labour the two main parties. and anti-corruption element, change ended up being po - paign. movement. Protests in June and July pandered to both left and larised into the usual camps She has stayed quiet in ● A workers’ charter of trade union rights — to organise, to strike, to expressed growing disillu - right. Silva is contradictory, and therefore voting for ei - order to pacify and pander picket effectively, and to take solidarity action. sionment with the main two changing her platform to fit ther Rousseff or Neves. to the church organisa - ● Taxation of the rich to fund decent public services, homes, education parties. Many talked about who she’s talking to. That’s Rousseff is regarded by tions backing her candi - and jobs for all. not voting for either. Silva why she found it difficult to many as “bad but not as bad dacy. ● A workers’ movement that fights all forms of oppression. Full gathered supporters with equality for women and social provision to free women from the burden of housework. Free abortion on request. Full equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. Black and white workers’ unity FREE SHAHROKH ZAMANI against racism. ● Open borders. AND REZA SHAHABI! ● Global solidarity against global capital — workers everywhere have more in common with each other than with their capitalist or Stalinist rulers. ● Democracy at every level of society, from the smallest workplace or community to global social organisation. ● Working-class solidarity in international politics: equal rights for all nations, against imperialists and predators big and small. Jailed for fighting for workers’ rights in Iran. ● Maximum left unity in action, and openness in debate. ● If you agree with us, please take some copies of Solidarity to sell — Trade unionism should not be a crime! and join us! http://chn.ge/1vMfS9F Contact us: ● 020 7394 8923 ● [email protected] The editor (Cathy Nugent), 20e Tower Workshops, Riley Student rent up by 5% Road, London, SE1 3DG. ● Printed by Trinity Mirror By Omar Raii rooms in nearby Pentonville Prison are likely to be nicer. At University College Lon - HSBC (not known for its don students face con - caring attitude towards stu - Get Solidarity every week! stant increases in rent. dents) recently accused UCL ● Trial sub, 6 issues £5 of having the priciest halls o The average rise of a basic These homes need people! ● 22 issues (six months). £18 waged in the country, with an aver - o room at UCL accommoda - age room costing £157 a £9 unwaged tion has gone up by 5% Activists from the Focus E15 housing campaign who o week. For comparison, the occupied an empty flat on the Carpenters estate have now since last year (higher than ● 44 issues (year). £35 waged o cost of a standard room at ended the occupation. Earlier this week they won a fight inflation!) while student £17 unwaged o nearby King’s College Lon - against forced eviction from the flats. As they left they loans have gone up by a don is £127.50. ● European rate: 28 euros (22 issues) o published photos of the good condition these homes are in. measly 1%. This year however, stu - As social tenants are forcibly moved out of London, these or 50 euros (44 issues) o Though increased mar - dents are organising a fight flats stand empty. The campaign will continue. Tick as appropriate above and send your money to: ketisation of universities back. The first step will be a across the country is ensur - 20e Tower Workshops, Riley Road, London, SE1 3DG motion to the student union ing university halls are be - General Assembly to de - Tory plan to scrap Human Cheques (£) to “AWL”. coming more and more mand that UCL lower its Or make £ and euro payments at workersliberty.org/sub. expensive everywhere, UCL rents and commit to no seems to have a particular above-inflation rises in rents Rights Act Name . problem with giving its stu - year by year. dents decent and affordable If UCL continues to ig - At Tory Party conference which may effect their in - Address . rooms to live in. nore students’ welfare then Cameron pledged to repeal tentions to tighten up anti- A year ago, upon its com - activists should argue for the Human Rights Act and terror laws, and to do some change Britain’s relationship political posturing to win . pletion, UCL’s newest hall and plan an organised stu - with the European Court of over UKIP voters. (appropriately named New dent rent strike. I enclose £ . Students will only be Human Rights. Hall) was voted the worst able to stand these ab - The Tories wish to avoid • Full article: new building in Britain, surd rents for so long. “inconvenient rulings” bit.ly/1EpUbQD with many commenting that 3 NEWS Next steps in Hong Kong By Chen Ying in Hong water and food to be let nesses, probably eroding the to work. The numbers sur - Kong through the cordon of pro - income of the triads’ protec - rounding the Chief Execu - testers to reach those police tion rackets as well. tive’s office reduced to a The protest movement in officers on duty inside the On 4 October, while the token presence. Talks about Hong Kong has been besieged building. government denied claims talks continued between stu - forced to retreat in the Leung refused to resign, of any collusion with triad dent leaders and govern - face of orchestrated vio - but appointed his deputy to gangs, and while university ment negotiators. Secondary lent attacks by Beijing- meet with student leaders. leaders urged students to schools reopened in the funded triad gangs, with In response, on 3 October, disperse to avoid bloodshed, Central and Wanchai dis - the complicity of the po - Leung and the local pro-Bei - the Federation of Students, tricts. lice force. jing forces counter-attacked. Scholarism and the Occupy The Occupy Central lead - Hordes of burly men Central leaders held a defi - ers’ stance throughout is Pro-China thugs attacked occupiers The gangs began their at - wearing blue ribbons — ant anti-violence rally in Ad - based on the model of non- tack in Mong Kok, a high symbolising support for the miralty, albeit with a much violent mass civil disobedi - place strikes to support Such a campaign should density urban working class police — waded into the smaller crowd of several ence as practised by Gandhi them. fight for; the resignation of district with a high concen - protestors in Mong Kok, thousand. and Martin Luther King. Given the intransigence of the Chief Executive; calling tration of organized crime. with very few police on However the government the government, with clear to account those responsible The spontaneous occupa - duty. Videos widely circu - THUGS has avoided arresting the backing by Beijing, the mass for instigating violent at - tion of Mong Kok on 29 Sep - lated in Hong Kong showed The Federation of Stu - leaders to make them mar - movement is lacking the po - tacks; legislative councillors tember — in response to the police arresting some of the dents, having refused talks tyrs, but outmanoeuvred litical leadership to maintain to vote against the adoption deployment of teargas — thugs but releasing them al - on 3 October, decided to them with greater tactical the pressure to force the of the electoral package pro - was initially hugely success - most as soon as they were meet with government ne - skill.
Recommended publications
  • The European Election Results 2009
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION FOR THE EASTERN REGION 4TH JUNE 2009 STATEMENT UNDER RULE 56(1)(b) OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS RULES 2004 I, David Monks, hereby give notice that at the European Parliamentary Election in the Eastern Region held on 4th June 2009 — 1. The number of votes cast for each Party and individual Candidate was — Party or Individual Candidate No. of Votes 1. Animals Count 13,201 2. British National Party – National Party – Protecting British Jobs 97,013 3. Christian Party ―Proclaiming Christ’s Lordship‖ The Christian Party – CPA 24,646 4. Conservative Party 500,331 5. English Democrats Party – English Democrats – ―Putting England First!‖ 32,211 6. Jury Team 6,354 7. Liberal Democrats 221,235 8. NO2EU:Yes to Democracy 13,939 9 Pro Democracy: Libertas.EU 9,940 10. Social Labour Party (Leader Arthur Scargill) 13,599 11. The Green Party 141,016 12. The Labour Party 167,833 13. United Kingdom First 38,185 14. United Kingdom Independence Party – UKIP 313,921 15. Independent (Peter E Rigby) 9,916 2. The number of votes rejected was: 13,164 3. The number of votes which each Party or Candidate had after the application of subsections (4) to (9) of Section 2 of the European Parliamentary Elections Act 2002, was — Stage Party or Individual Candidate Votes Allocation 1. Conservative 500331 First Seat 2. UKIP 313921 Second Seat 3. Conservative 250165 Third Seat 4. Liberal Democrat 221235 Fourth Seat 5. Labour Party 167833 Fifth Seat 6. Conservative 166777 Sixth Seat 7. UKIP 156960 Seventh Seat 4. The seven Candidates elected for the Eastern Region are — Name Address Party 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election Agents’ Names and Offices
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION EASTERN REGION – 22 MAY 2014 NOTICE OF ELECTION AGENTS’ NAMES AND OFFICES I HEREBY GIVE NOTICE that the following names and addresses of election agents of parties and individual candidates at this election, and the addresses of the offices or places of such election agents to which all claims, notices, legal process, and other documents addressed to them may be sent, have respectively been declared in writing to me as follows:- Name of Party or Individual Name of Agent Offices of Election Agent to which Candidate claims etc. may be sent An Independence from Europe Paul Kevin Wiffen 9 Cedar Park Gardens, Romford, – UK Independence Now Essex RM1 4DS British National Party – Fighting Richard Andrew Perry Millhouse Hotel, Maldon Road, Unsustainable Housing Langford, Maldon, Essex CM9 4SS Because We Care Christian Peoples Alliance Carl Shaun Clark 41 Ripon Way Thetford Norfolk IP24 1DF Conservative Party – For real Alan Mabbutt 4 Matthew Parker Street change in Europe London SW1H 9HQ English Democrats – I’m Robin Charles Quires Green, Willingale, Essex English, NOT British, NOT William Tilbrook CM5 0QP EUropean! Green Party Grace Philip Anvil Rise, High Street, Hempstead, Saffron Walden, Essex CB10 2PD Labour Party Dan Simpson East of England Labour Party, 1 Whitehall Estate, Flex Meadow, Harlow, Essex CM19 5TP Liberal Democrats Ian Horner 15 Spruce Drive, Brandon, Suffolk IP27 0UT NO2EU – Yes to Workers’ Brian Denny 177 Western Road, Leigh-on-Sea, Rights Essex SS9 2PQ UK Independence Party (UKIP) Lisa Ann Duffy Unit 1, King Charles Business Park, Heathfield, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 6UT Steve Packham Regional Returning Officer, Civic Centre, Duke Street, Chelmsford CM1 1JE Dated: 24 April 2014 Printed by the Regional Returning Officer, Civic Centre, Duke Street, Chelmsford CM1 1JE .
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliamentary Elections Results 2014
    European Parliamentary Elections Yorkshire & the Humber Region Results European Parliamentary Elections 22 May 2014 Verification figures & % turnout Local authority Electorate Verification figure Turnout Barnsley 179,405 53,290 29.70% Bradford 342,381 130,107 38.00% Calderdale 145,597 53,102 36.47% Craven 44,473 17,103 38.46% Doncaster 219,729 69,424 31.60% East Riding 266,618 84,720 31.78% Hambleton 70,942 24,577 34.64% Harrogate 117,772 43,928 37.30% Hull 184,408 49,999 27.11% Kirklees 309,219 110,759 35.82% Leeds 534,130 186,242 34.87% North Lincolnshire 124,505 37,173 29.86% North East Lincolnshire 113,607 35,352 31.12% Richmondshire 35,643 11,645 32.67% Rotherham 194,956 68,459 35.12% Ryedale 40,421 13,890 34.36% Scarborough 84,236 26,239 31.15% Selby 65,954 21,175 32.11% Sheffield 393,077 142,132 36.16% Wakefield 247,649 76,276 30.80% York 153,470 47,435 30.91% Yorkshire & the Humber Region verification figure & % turnout 3,868,192 1,301,644 33.33% European Parliamentary Elections 22 May 2014 Barnsley Local Totals Party No. of Votes Statistics An Independence from Europe 1165 Electorate 179,405 British National Party 1359 % Turnout 29.70% Conservative Party 5729 Spoilt Ballot Papers English Democrats 1201 Want of official mark 0 Green Party 2695 Voting for more than one 53 Labour Party 19455 registered party Liberal Democrats 1142 Writing or mark by which voter 1 NO2EU 170 can be identified UK Independence Party (UKIP) 19026 Paper unmarked or void for 175 Yorkshire First 1119 uncertainty Total number of Total Votes for Parties 53061 spoilt papers 229 European Parliamentary Elections 22 May 2014 Bradford Local Totals Party No.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Space
    Alternative radical histories and campaigns continuing today. Sam Burgum November 2018 Property ownership is not a given, but a social and legal construction, with a specific history. Magna Carta (1215) established a legal precedent for protecting property owners from arbitrary possession by the state. ‘For a man’s home is his ASS Archives ASS castle, and each man’s home is his safest refuge’ - Edward Coke, 1604 Charter of the Forest (1217) asserted the rights of the ‘commons’ (i.e. propertyless) to access the 143 royal forests enclosed since 1066. Enclosure Acts (1760-1870) enclosed 7million acres of commons through 4000 acts of parliament. My land – a squatter fable A man is out walking on a hillside when suddenly John Locke (1632-1704) Squatting & Trespass Context in Trespass & Squatting the owner appears. argued that enclosure could ‘Get off my land’, he yells. only be justified if: ‘Who says it’s your land?’ demands the intruder. • ‘As much and as good’ ‘I do, and I’ve got the deeds to prove it.’ was left to others; ‘Well, where did you get it from?’ ‘From my father.’ • Unused property could be ‘And where did he get it from?’ forfeited for better use. ‘From his father. He was the seventeenth Earl. The estate originally belonged to the first Earl.’ This logic was used to ‘And how did he get it?’ dispossess indigenous people ‘He fought for it in the War of the Roses.’ of land, which appeared Right – then I’ll fight you for it!’ ‘unused’ to European settlers. 1 ‘England is not a Free people till the poor that have no land… live as Comfortably as the landlords that live in their inclosures.’ Many post-Civil war movements and sects saw the execution of King Charles as ending a centuries-long Norman oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • Second-Order Success, First-Order Gains and the European Electoral Cycle
    Prepared for the 26th ECPR Summer School on Political Parties. The University of Nottingham (UK), School of Politics and International Relations, 12 September - 23 September, 2016. This is a preliminary draft that will be revised. Comments welcome. A Springboard to the Domestic Arena? Second-Order Success, First-Order Gains and the European Electoral Cycle Julia Schulte-Cloos 21 August 2016 [Word Count: 9250] Abstract European Parliament (EP) elections offer a distinct incentive structure to voters as there is no government formation at stake. Triggering protest and non-strategical votes, small and radical parties enjoy structural advantages in the supranational contest. While these patterns are well established in the literature, it remains puz- zling how success in the second-order arena impinges on the parties’ first-order trajectories. We lack a systematic understanding of the implications that the sec- ondary elections themselves have on party competition within the domestic arena. This paper posits that EP elections serve as a springboard for success in the national arena. The institution of the EP elections along with the different voting calculi therein has unanticipated consequences for domestic party competition. Drawing on a novel database encompassing the electoral results of all EU member states in national and EP elections since 1979, the temporal distance between these elections, and their position within the respective electoral cycles, I show that particularly populist radical right parties benefit from a spillover of European success to the na- tional arena. This effect is especially pronounced if the temporal distance between the national and the European election is close. The results suggest that the insti- tution of EP elections not only provides these parties with a permeable forum for politicising Europe and their antagonism towards further integration, but that the European campaign also bestows salience upon their nationalistic policy demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaigning for the Labour Party but from The
    Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Nicolas Sigoillot To cite this version: Nicolas Sigoillot. Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Ob- jectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2020, XXV (3), 10.4000/rfcb.5873. hal-03250124 HAL Id: hal-03250124 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03250124 Submitted on 4 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXV-3 | 2020 "Get Brexit Done!" The 2019 General Elections in the UK Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Faire campagne pour le parti travailliste mais depuis l’extérieur et avec des objectifs différents:
    [Show full text]
  • INDEPENDENT SOCIALISTS AFTER the DECEMBER 12TH GENERAL ELECTION from Illusions in a Lexit Brexit to a Disillusioned Lexit from Brexit Politics
    INDEPENDENT SOCIALISTS AFTER THE DECEMBER 12TH GENERAL ELECTION From Illusions in a Lexit Brexit to a Disillusioned Lexit from Brexit PolitiCs ______________________ Sunday Telegraph backs Lexit with ‘revolution’ and a ‘people’s Brexit ’ Contents a) The 2015 general election provided a warning b) After 2015 - an increasingly floundering Left c) Northern Ireland – a different pattern d) Reactionary unionism and Europhobic opposition to the EU e) The largest independent Socialist parties walk into the Brexit trap f) The official Remain and Leave campaigns – two wings of the British ruling class g) The Lexiters’ false arguments h) The political options open in the run-up to the 2016 EU referendum i) From 23rd May 2016 to 8th June 2017 – A victory for the Left or the Right? j) ‘Independent’ Socialists and ‘Oh Jeremy Corbyn’! 1 k) Corbyn and the ‘independent’ Socialists unwittingly help Boris Johnson to victory l) Independent socialists after the December 12th general election m) Independent socialists in Scotland and Northern Ireland/Ireland n) Conclusion a) The 2015 general election provided a warning The centrality of constitutional issues in the current political situation has wrong-footed Socialist organisations both in Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) and Ireland (the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland). Far happier addressing ‘bread and butter’ issues, the largest independent Socialist organisations, particularly the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) of Great Britain and the Socialist Workers Party (Ireland) - SWP(I), and the Socialist Party of England and Wales – SP(E&W) (with its autonomous section, the Socialist Party of Scotland – SPS) and the Socialist Party (Ireland) - SP(I), have largely left the constitutional nature of the states they operate in to the ruling class, or political representatives of would-be ruling classes.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliamentary Election Results 2009 Research Paper June
    European Parliamentary Election Results 2009 Research Paper June 2009 This paper summarises the results of the European Parliamentary Elections held in Wales on 4 June 2009. Figures are provided for votes, share of the vote and turnout in Wales. Some comparisons with countries across the EU are also included. The National Assembly for Wales is the democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people, makes laws for Wales and holds the Welsh Government to account. The Members’ Research Service is part of the National Assembly for Wales. We provide confidential and impartial research support to the Assembly’s scrutiny and legislation committees, and to all 60 individual Assembly Members and their staff. Members’ Research Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of Assembly Members and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We welcome comments on our briefings; please post or email to the addresses below. An electronic version of this paper can be found on the National Assembly’s website at: www.assemblywales.org/bus-assembly-publications-research.htm Further hard copies of this paper can be obtained from: Members’ Research Service National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA Email: [email protected] Enquiry no: 09/2145 European Parliamentary Election Results 2009 Research Paper Rachel Dolman June 2009 Paper Number: 09/020 © National Assembly for Wales Commission 2009 © Comisiwn Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru 2009 Executive Summary This paper is intended to provide a statistical overview of the European Parliamentary election results which took place across the European Union from 4 to 7 June 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 European Election Results for London
    2009 European election results for London Data Management and Analysis Group 2009 European election results for London DMAG Briefing 2009-07 July 2009 Gareth Piggott ISSN 1479-7879 DMAG Briefing 2009-07 1 2009 European election results for London DMAG Briefing 2009-07 July 2009 2009 European election results for London For more information please contact: Gareth Piggott Data Management and Analysis Group Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA Tel: 020 7983 4327 e-mail: [email protected] Copyright © Greater London Authority, 2009 Source of all data: Regional Returning Officers All maps are © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. (Greater London Authority) (LA100032379) (2009) Data can be made available in other formats on request In some charts in this report colours that are associated with political parties are used. Printing in black and white, can make those charts hard to read. ISSN 1479-7879 This briefing is printed on at least 70 per cent recycled paper. The paper is suitable for recycling. 2 DMAG Briefing 2009-07 2009 European election results for London List of tables, charts and maps Page Turnout Map 1 Turnout 2009, by borough 5 Map 2 Change in turnout 2004-2009, by borough 5 Result Table 3 Summary of election results 1999-2009, London 5 Table 4 Order of winning seats, London 2009 6 Figure 5 Shares of votes, 2009, London and UK 7 Figure 6 Share of vote for main parties by UK region, 2009 8 London voting trends 1999-2009 Figure 7 Share of votes for main parties, UK 1999 to 2009 8 Figure 8
    [Show full text]
  • The Machinery of Eviction
    The Machinery of Eviction: Bailiffs, Power, Resistance, and Eviction Enforcement Practices in England and Wales ! Alexander George Baker ! Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Newcastle University January 2017 Abstract This thesis addresses a significant research gap in critical research on forced eviction. It attempts to shift focus from the experiences of the evicted, examined in previous studies, to the work of evictors and eviction enforcement. It asks how the ‘tools, technologies, strategies, and tactics’ of forced eviction develop and are implemented in England and Wales. Using qualitative interviews centred around a case study of a city in the North of England to examine the ‘everyday’ form of evictions, this thesis looks at the work of a Rent Arrears Recovery Team on the ‘Benford’ housing estate in the city, and the working lives of County Court Bailiffs at the local court as they work in the context of a national ‘housing crisis’. Interviews with third party organizations and a High Court Enforcement firm, video footage, and online accounts of large-scale evictions provided by a wide range of sources from social movements are used to explore the ‘exceptional’ forms of displacement that emerge on a national scale. This research shows that Eviction enforcement actors and specialists have to employ forms of coercion which exist on a continuum between the ‘emotional’ and the ‘physical’; these practices are underpinned by ‘intuitive’ tactics built through individual and personal histories and the historical context in which evictions take place. These strategies and tactics of eviction are shaped by the resistance of the evicted, and the development of the disciplinary institutions of eviction happens in response to this resistance, which sets the pace for the development of the capacity of the state and economy to displace.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nomadic War Machine in the Metropolis: En/Countering London's
    A Nomadic War Machine in the Metropolis: En/Countering London’s 21st Century Housing Crisis with Focus E15 Paul Watt Abstract This paper builds upon Colin McFarlane’s (2011) call in City for an ‘assemblage urbanism’ to supplement critical urbanism. It does so by mapping the spatio-political contours of London’s 21st century housing crisis through the geophilosophical framework of Deleuze and Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus (2013) and Hardt and Negri’s analysis of the metropolis in Commonwealth (2009). The paper examines the Focus E15 housing campaign based around a group of young mothers in the East London borough of Newham. In 2013 the mothers were living in the Focus E15 Foyer supported housing unit for young people in Newham, but they were subsequently threatened with eviction as a result of welfare cuts. After successfully contesting the mothers’ own prospective expulsion from the city, the campaign shifted to the broader struggle for ‘social housing not social cleansing’. The paper draws upon participant observation at campaign events and interviews with key members. The Focus E15 campaign has engaged in a series of actions which form a distinctive way of undertaking housing politics in London, a politics that can be understood using a Deleuzoguattarian framework. Several campaign actions, including temporary occupations, are analysed. It is argued that these actions have created ‘smooth space’ in a manner which is to an extent distinctive from many other London housing campaigns which are rooted in a more sedentary defensive approach based around the protection of existing homes and 1 communities – ‘our place’. It is such spatio-political creativity – operating as a ‘nomadic war machine’ – which has given rise to the high-profile reputation of the Focus E15 campaigners as inspirational young women who do not ‘know their place’.
    [Show full text]
  • Election for the European Parliament Etholiad Senedd Ewrop
    ELECTION FOR THE ETHOLIAD SENEDD EWROP EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RHANBARTH ETHOLIADOL CYMRU ELECTORAL REGION OF WALES Yr wyf fi, BRYN PARRY-JONES, sef y Swyddog Canlyniadau Rhanbarthol I, BRYN PARRY-JONES, being the Regional Returning Officer for Wales at dros Gymru yn Etholiad yr Aelodau i wasanaethu yn Senedd Ewrop dros the Election of Members to serve in the European Parliament for the Ranbarth Etholiadol Cymru a gynhaliwyd ar 4ydd Mehefin 2009, drwy hyn Electoral Region of Wales held on the 4th of June 2009, do hereby give yn hysbysu fod cyfanswm nifer y pleidleisiau a gofnodwyd i bob plaid notice that the total number of votes recorded for each registered party in gofrestredig yn y rhanbarth hynny fel a ganlyn:- that region is as follows:- British National Party 37,114 Christian Party “Proclaiming Christ’s Lordship” – Plaid Gristionogol 13,037 Cymru “Datgan Arglwyddiath Crist” Conservative Party – Plaid Geidwadol Cymru 145,193 Jury Team 3,793 Liberal Democrats – Democratiaid Rhyddfrydol Cymru 73,082 No2EU:Yes to Democracy 8,600 Plaid Cymru – The Party of Wales 126,702 Socialist Labour Party (LEADER ARTHUR SCARGILL) 12,402 The Green Party – Plaid Werdd 38,160 The Labour Party – Y Blaid Lafur 138,852 United Kingdom Independence Party – Plaid Annibyniaeth Y Deyrnas 87,585 Unedig SAY NO TO EUROPEAN UNION The total number of ballot papers rejected was Yr oedd cyfanswm nifer y papurau pleidleisio a wrthodwyd yn 3,128 And I do hereby declare that the undermentioned are duly Ac yr wyf fi drwy hyn yn datgan fod y rhai a enwir isod wedi eu elected
    [Show full text]