DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Action The Rio Grande United States Department of Agriculture National Forest Plan: Forest Service Proposed Action Rio Grande National Forest In developing a proposed revised plan, the responsible September 2016 official “shall engage the public… early and throughout the planning process.” (36 CFR 219.4 (a)). RIO GRANDE PYRAMID IN THE WEMINUCHE WILDERNESS. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected] (link sends e-mail). USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Proposed Action—Rio Grande National Forest Plan Revision Rio Grande National Forest Proposed Action Lead agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible official: Dan Dallas, Forest Supervisor Rio Grande National Forest For information, Erin Minks, Planning Team Leader contact: 1803 W. Highway 160 Monte Vista, CO 81144 719-852-6215 Email comments or [email protected] questions to: Documents are posted: Forest Plan Revision webpage Abstract: The Forest Service has identified the preliminary purpose and need and proposed action to revise the 1996 Rio Grande National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan in accordance with the 2012 National Forest System Land Management Planning Rule adopted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Assessments documenting existing information about relevant ecological, economic, and social conditions, trends, and sustainability and their relationship to the land management plan within the context of the broader landscape were published during the spring of 2016. Relevant information from the assessments, applicable laws and policies, and public comment were considered in determining the need to change and proposed action. i USDA Forest Service UPPER EAST WILLOW CREEK, PART OF THE WASON PARK CRA. ii Proposed Action—Rio Grande National Forest Plan Revision Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Strategic Framework ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Forest-wide Vision ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Roles & Contributions ............................................................................................................................... 4 Forest-wide Goals ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Goal 1: Protect and restore watershed health, water resources, and the systems that rely on them .. 7 Goal 2: Maintain and restore sustainable, resilient ecosystems ........................................................... 8 Goal 3: Actively contribute to social and economic sustainability in the broader landscape and connect citizens to the land ................................................................................................................... 8 Strategic Domain ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Forest-wide Desired Conditions ................................................................................................................ 9 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................ 13 Geographic Areas ................................................................................................................................... 13 Fire Management Zones ..................................................................................................................... 15 Fire for Resource Benefit - Maintenance zone (FRB-M) ................................................................ 15 Fire for Resource Benefit - Restoration and Protection (FRB-RP) zone ........................................ 15 Resource Protection (Wildland Urban Interface) zone (RP) ........................................................... 16 General Forest Geographic Area ........................................................................................................ 16 Primitive Wilderness Geographic Area ............................................................................................... 18 Roadless Geographic Area ................................................................................................................. 19 Specially Designated Geographic Area .............................................................................................. 21 Tactical Domain .......................................................................................................................................... 23 Management Areas ................................................................................................................................. 23 Proposed Management Area 1.1 – Designated Wilderness ........................................................... 23 Management Area 1.5 – Eligible Wild Rivers.................................................................................. 24 Management Area 2.2 – Research Natural Areas .......................................................................... 24 Management Area 3.1 – Special Interest Area—Use and Interpretation Emphasis....................... 25 Management Area 3.3 – Backcountry ............................................................................................. 25 Management Area 3.4 – Designated and Eligible Scenic Rivers ................................................... 26 Proposed Management Area 3.5 – Colorado Roadless Area ......................................................... 26 Proposed Management Area 3.6 – Upper Tier Colorado Roadless Area ...................................... 28 Management Area 4.3 – Dispersed and Developed Recreation .................................................... 29 Management Area 5.11 – General Forest and Intermingled Rangelands ...................................... 29 Management Area 5.13 – Forest Products ..................................................................................... 30 Management Area 5.41 – Deer and Elk Winter Range .................................................................. 31 Management Area 5.42 – Special Wildlife Areas – Bighorn Sheep ............................................... 31 Management Area 6.6 – Grassland Resource Production ............................................................. 32 Management Area 4.21 – Scenic Byways and Scenic Railroads ................................................... 32 Management Area 4.4 – Designated and Eligible Recreational Rivers .......................................... 33 Management Area 8.22 – Ski-based Resorts ................................................................................. 33 Adaptive Management Domain ............................................................................................................... 36 Monitoring Domain .................................................................................................................................. 36 iii USDA Forest Service WATERFALL BELOW LAKE ANN, SOUTH SAN JUAN WILDERNESS. iv Proposed Action—Rio Grande National Forest Plan Revision Introduction This document lays out the strategy that the Rio Grande National Forest (Fig. 1) will use to proceed into the formal Forest Plan Revision process, which will result in an Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision as well as a revised Forest Plan. The strategic framework presented below is organized by levels starting with overarching goals. The goals help focus the strategic, tactical,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rio Grande National Forest – Assessment 12 Areas of Tribal Importance
    Rio Grande National Forest – Assessment 12 Areas of Tribal Importance Rio Grande National Forest – Assessment 12 Areas of Tribal Importance Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Information Sources and Gaps.................................................................................................................. 2 Existing Forest Plan Direction for Tribal Resources ................................................................................ 3 Scale of Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 3 Intertribal and Interagency Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Memorandum of Understanding ................................................................................................................................... 4 Existing Tribal Rights ............................................................................................................................... 4 Previous Treaties with Ute Bands ......................................................................................................... 4 Hunting Rights: The Brunot Treaty ...................................................................................................... 5 Spiritual Rights ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO Parks and Wildlife
    COLORADO Parks and Wildlife Depai lmenl of Natural Resources Durango Area 15 Office 151 East 16th Street Durango, Colorado 81301 P 970.247.0855 I F 970.382. 6672 September 20, 2016 Ms. Cam Hooley Columbine Ran ger District San Juan National Forest P.O. Box 439 Bayfield, CO 81122 Re: Initial Draft Hermosa Creek Watershed Management Plan Dear Ms. Hooley: Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) has reviewed the Initial Draft Hermosa Creel< Watershed Management Plan (Hermosa Plan). The newly created Hermosa Creek Wilderness and the Hermosa Special Management Area (SMA) are a result of a collaborative effort from a diverse group of local stakeholders that desired to achieve legislative protection of the watershed. The legislation that created the Hermosa Creek Watershed Protection stat es : "The purpose of the Special Man agement Area is to conserve and protect for the benefit of present and future generations the watershed, geological, scientific, recreational, wildlife, riparian, historical, educational, and scenic resources of the Special Management Area." The Hermosa Plan is an amendment to the 2013 San Juan National Forest (SJNF) Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan), and the Recreational and Travel Management analysis and decision will be an integral part of the plan. The Hermosa Plan area is approximately 107, 900 ac res of National Forest land and includes both the SMA and Hermosa Creek Wilderness located in La Plata and San Juan Counties. It is a popular destination for many types of motorized and non -motorized rec reation including: Off Hi ghway Vehicle (OHV) riding, motorbiking, mountain biking, hiking, horseback riding, fishing, hunting, and camping.
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 20, 2020 Becky Leinweber Executive Director
    AUGUST 20, 2020 Becky Leinweber Executive Director Pikes Peak Outdoor Recreation Alliance LAST WEEK, PART ONE: Current Realities & Future Outlook of Recreation in the Pikes Peak Region WELCOME TO PART TWO: Successful Strategies for Sustainable Outdoor Recreation & Tourism THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS! Hosting Partner Summit Sponsor THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS! Devil’s Playground Sponsor Barr Camp Sponsor Media Sponsors David Leinweber Chairman Pikes Peak Outdoor Recreation Alliance TOP ISSUES FACING THE PIKES PEAK REGION’S OUTDOORS PIKES PEAK MULTI-USE PLAN Created: September 1999 Do we scrap this plan or complete it? Challenges? Opportunities! Chris Castilian Executive Director Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO) WELCOME Strategic Plan Open House Meeting Roadmap Celebrate GOCO 101 Proposed vision for2020 and beyond Survey: What do you think? Coming up… Southwest ConservationCorps GOCO Supported Projects in Rio Grande County MonteVista Community Sports Complex South Fork Rio Grande Park RiverValley Ranch/Rio Grande Legacy Colorado Wetlands InitiativeLegacy Ski-Hi Rodeo Arena &Grandstand renovation Del Norte Area Trails Master Plan Natural Wonders of the San Luis Valley Play Park Ski Hi Rodeo Arena GOCO’s Mission To help the people of Colorado preserve, protect, enhance, and manage the state’s wildlife, park, river, trails, and open space heritage. Rio Grande Healthy Living Park, Alamosa Lottery Beneficiaries 40% 50% or cap 10% “spillover” Funding Equally Across Program Areas Why We’re Here Today Chapman Park, Monte Vista What GOCOWants We want to
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining 100-Year Flood Flows for Approximate Floodplains in Colorado
    Guidelines For Determining 100-Year Flood Flows For Approximate Floodplains in Colorado Version 6.0 Department of Natural Resources Colorado Water Conservation Board Flood Protection Program 1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 Denver, Colorado 80203 www.cwcb.state.co.us June 2004 1 Guidelines For Determining 100-Year Flood Flows For Approximate Floodplains in Colorado Version 6.0 Prepared by: Thomas W. Browning, Colorado Water Conservation Board In cooperation with the Colorado Flood Hydrology Advisory Committee Department of Natural Resources Colorado Water Conservation Board Flood Protection Program 1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 Denver, Colorado 80203 www.cwcb.state.co.us June 2004 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The publication entitled Guidelines for Determining 100-Year Flood Flows for Approximate Floodplains in Colorado (Guidelines) was prepared by Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) staff as a tool for estimating 100-year flood discharges for approximate floodplains where detailed engineering analyses are limited or unavailable. The Guidelines are designed to provide a streamlined hydrologic procedure for use in the review and designation of approximate floodplain studies and mapping in Colorado. The Guidelines facilitate the estimation of 100-year flood discharges for approximate floodplains as required by the CWCB's technical standards. Many of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM’s) and Flood Hazard Boundary Maps (FHBM's) prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Flood Insurance Administration (FIA) include approximate floodplain delineations within Colorado. Those approximate delineations do not have detailed hydrologic information to accompany them and were therefore not previously designated and approved by the CWCB. However, Colorado statutes require that floodplain information to be used by local governments for land use and regulatory purposes must first be designated and approved by the CWCB.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Wetland Condition on the Rio Grande National Forest
    Assessment of Wetland Condition on the Rio Grande National Forest October 2012 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Assessment of Wetland Condition on the Rio Grande National Forest Prepared for: USDA Forest Service Rio Grande National Forest 1803 W. Highway 160 Monte Vista, CO 81144 Prepared by: Joanna Lemly Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 All photos taken by Colorado Natural Heritage Program Staff. Copyright © 2012 Colorado State University Colorado Natural Heritage Program All Rights Reserved EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Rio Grande National Forest (RGNF) covers 1.83 million acres in south central Colorado and contains the very headwaters of the Rio Grande River. The Forest’s diverse geography creates a template for equally diverse wetlands, which provide important ecological services to both the RGNF and lands downstream. Though now recognized as a vital component of the landscape, many wetlands have been altered by a range of human land uses since European settlement. Across the RGNF, mining, logging, reservoirs, water diversions, grazing, and recreation have all impacted wetlands. In order to adequately manage and protect wetland resources on the RGNF, reliable data are needed on their location, extent and condition. Between 2008 and 2011, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) partnered with Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) on a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) funded effort to map and assess the condition of wetlands throughout the Rio Grande Headwaters River Basin, which includes the RGNF. Existing paper maps of wetlands created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)’s National Wetland Inventory (NWI) program were converted to digital data by GIS Analysts at CPW.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Easement Rio Grande
    Fishing Easement Rio Grande When Izak colligates his complicacy hurry-skurry not someways enough, is Mahesh aneurismal? Colourless Quinn restate, his variations vermiculate wile awash. Unridable and totemic Neil placed almost reflexively, though Ikey spot-checks his ordinaries aromatizing. The Lower Rio Grande Flood emergency Project LRGFCP is located in boost the. Camping only one being so at one member of levee would allow motorized boats, bendway weirs have a false sense of the great commercial purposes. Addled eggs of northern aplomado falcons in the LRGV have been assessed for contaminants for many years. Seeks fine to develop depends on ranches, access by refuge project anticipate that follows most scenic or fishing easement rio grande cutthroat in. Gilmore Ranch, Bernalillo, which contributes almost twice as much play as most other. Local channel narrowing can occur. We prohibit fishing tackle restrictions for wildlife refuge located just downstream pool near high forest to learn about how effective. Rio Grande WSR Administrative History Appendix. This report of rio grande from rio grande? Craig to Axial Basin. It does a rio grande, dedicated funding for a day of coyote only during hunting on refuges. Reaches of competing over portions could slow running through many more. NHAs across the United States, domestic goats, many Federal and State agencies. Rgsm with ecosystem monitoring of take advantage is held by our larger scour. Puett reservoir remains within only full electrical, rio grande watershed is also contains a multitude of funds could be only at our summit reservoir. How many millionaires are in Texas? No design guidelines exist and the application of trench filled bendway weirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Classifications and Numeric Standards for Rio Grande Basin
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. November 12, 2020 Regulation No. 36 - Classifications and Numeric Standards for Rio Grande Basin Effective March 12, 2020 The following provisions are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes with these few exceptions: EPA has taken no action on: • All segment-specific total phosphorus (TP) numeric standards based on the interim value for river/stream segments with a cold water aquatic life classification (0.11 mg/L TP) or a warm water aquatic life classification (0.17 mg/L TP) • All segment-specific TP numeric standards based on the interim value for lake/reservoir segments with a warm water aquatic life classification (0.083 mg/L TP) Code of Colorado Regulations Secretary of State State of Colorado DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Control Commission REGULATION NO. 36 - CLASSIFICATIONS AND NUMERIC STANDARDS FOR RIO GRANDE BASIN 5 CCR 1002-36 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] 36.1 AUTHORITY These regulations are promulgated pursuant to section 25-8-101 et seq. C.R.S., as amended, and in particular, 25-8-203 and 25-8-204. 36.2 PURPOSE These regulations establish classifications and numeric standards for the Rio Grande Basin, including all tributaries and standing bodies of water as indicated in section 36.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Mile High Mountaineer the Newsletter of the Denver Group of the Colorado Mountain Club
    Mile High Mountaineer The newsletter of the Denver Group of the Colorado Mountain Club www.cmc.org May www.hikingdenver.net 2015 www.facebook.com/CMC_Denver Volume 47, No.5 www.twitter.com/CMC_Denver Hikers head to the summit of Mount RAMPART RANGE ROADLESS Parnassus from Watrous Gulch in AREA TRAIL WORK July 2013, Photo by June 13 and 14 Steve Knapp Please plan to join the Denver and Pikes Peak groups for a trail work weekend in the northern end of the Rampart Range Roadless Area. We’ll be working on Saturday, June 13 (and maybe also part of Sunday), with the US Forest Service to close an illegal motorcycle route into the roadless area. Registration: cmc.org/calendar You can send questions to: Steve Bonowski [email protected]. ALDERFER/THREE SISTERS JUMP START YOUR SUMMER WITH HIKE SURGE FORESTRY PROJECT Denver Group encourages new members to get June 13 and 27 outdoors May 2 to 10 with 10 hikes in 9 days Jefferson County Open Space is By Maddie Philley, Denver Group Council Member removing Douglas fir trees on 23 acres in Alderfer/Three Sisters open space park. To encourage new members to participate in club activities, the Denver Group is holding a Volunteers are needed on Saturdays, “surge” of A and B hikes from May 2 to May 10. These hikes are for everyone. We will offer ap- June 13 and 27, to remove fir seedlings and proximately 10 surge hikes, in addition to those that were already scheduled. gather and stack tree limbs. If you are a current member, this is a great time for you to sign up for a hike: the weather is Online registration is available at beautiful and swimsuit season is coming.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A. LIST of MAP REFERENCES Halfmoon Creek (07083000) A
    APPENDIX A. LIST OF MAP REFERENCES Halfmoon Creek (07083000) a. U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps: · Lake County, Colorado (1:50,000), 1975 · Mount Elbert, Colorado (1:24,000), 1979 · Mount Massive, Colorado (1:24,000), 1967, streamflow-gaging station · Mt. Champion, Colorado (1:24,000), 1960 b. Geologic maps: · Tweto, Ogden, and Reed, J.C., Jr., 1973, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Mount Elbert 15-minute quadrangle, Lake, Chaffee, and Pitkin Counties, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 72–287. · Van Loenen, R.E., 1985, Geologic map of the Mount Massive Wilderness, Lake County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map 1792–A, 1 pl., scale 1:50,000. · Van Loenen, R.E., Lee, G.K., Campbell, D.L., and Thompson, J.R, 1989, Mineral resource potential of Mount Massive Wilderness, Lake County, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1636, 18 p. c. Soil surveys: · U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1975, Soil survey of Chaffee-Lake area, Colorado: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 78 p. d. Other maps: · Leadville, Colorado, 30' x 60' quadrangle, Bureau of Land Management, 1983, scale 1:100,000. Vallecito Creek near Bayfield, Colorado (09352900) a. U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Maps · Columbine Pass, Colorado (1:24,000), 1975 · Emerald Lake, Colorado (1:24,000), 1973 · La Plata County, Colorado (1:50,000), 1975 · Rio Grande Pyramid, Colorado (1:24,000), 1975 · Storm King Peak, Colorado (1:24,000), 1975 · Vallecito Reservoir, Colorado (1:24,000), 1971, streamflow-gaging station b. Geologic maps: · Cross, W., and Larsen, E.S., 1935, A brief review of the geology of the San Juan Region of southwestern Colorado: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Deglaciation and Postglacial Treeline Fluctuation in the Northern San Juan Mountains, Colorado
    Deglaciation and Postglacial Treeline Fluctuation in the Northern San Juan Mountains, Colorado Professional Paper 1782 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo: Site of former Lake Emma (foreground) and Emery Peak (4,057 meters) to the south, northern San Juan Mountains, Colo. Deglaciation and Postglacial Treeline Fluctuation in the Northern San Juan Mountains, Colorado By Paul E. Carrara Professional Paper 1782 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Carrara, P.E., 2011, Deglaciation and postglacial treeline fluctuation in the northern San Juan Mountains, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1782, 48 p. iii Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guides
    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on November 7, 2013 Field Guides Fossils and geology of the Greenhorn Cyclothem in the Comanche National Grassland, Colorado Steve Miller Field Guides 2013;33;269-278 doi: 10.1130/2013.0033(10) Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Field Guides Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes © 2013 Geological Society of America The Geological Society of America 18888 201320 Field Guide 33 2013 CELEBRATING ADVANCES IN GEOSCIENCE Fossils and geology of the Greenhorn Cyclothem in the Comanche National Grassland, Colorado Steve Miller Western Interior Paleontological Society, P.O.
    [Show full text]