DOCSLIB.ORG

Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado DIV WD County Station Name 1 2 WELD FT LUPTON SEC 3 AUG RETURN 2 10 PUEBLO TELLER RESERVOIR SPILLWAY NEAR STONE CITY, CO 2 67 PROWERS LAMAR WEST FARM AUGMENTATION STATION 1 2 UNKNOWN DENVER WATER REUSE DELIVERY TO CHEROKEE POWER PLANT 6 58 ROUTT MORRISON CREEK BELOW SILVER CREEK 3 35 SAGUACHE SAND CREEK AT GREAT SAND DUNES NATIONAL PARK 2 17 OTERO ARF HEADGATE 27 (BENTS FORT, LOWER) 7 29 ARCHULETA RIO BLANCO BELOW BLANCO DIVERSION DAM NEAR PAGOSA 7 34 MONTEZUMA JACKSON GULCH RESERVOIR 2 10 EL PASO ROCK CREEK ABOVE FORT CARSON RESERVATION, CO. 3 35 ALAMOSA BIG SPRING CREEK AT MEDANO RANCH NEAR MOSCA 1 7 JEFFERSON CLEAR CREEK AT CROKE CANAL DIVERSION 7 31 LA PLATA LOS PINOS RIVER ABOVE VALLECITO RESERVOIR NEAR BAYFIELD, CO 1 3 LARIMER HORSETOOTH RESERVOIR 5 38 PITKIN CASTLE CREEK AT ASPEN, CO Page 1 of 534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado DWR USGS Station Data Source Abbrev ID Co. Division of Water Resources FUL3RTCO U.S. Geological Survey TELSTOCO 07099238 Co. Division of Water Resources LAWAUGCO Co. Division of Water Resources DWRDECCO Co. Division of Water Resources MORBSCCO Co. Division of Water Resources SANDUNCO Co. Division of Water Resources ARF27LCO Co. Division of Water Resources RIOBLACO 09343300 Bureau of Reclamation (Station cooperator) JACRESCO U.S. Geological Survey ROCAFOCO 07105945 Co. Division of Water Resources BIGSPGCO Co. Division of Water Resources CLECROCO U.S. Geological Survey PINAVACO 09352800 NCWCD/Bureau of Reclamation (Station HORTOOCO Cooperators) U.S. Geological Survey CASCRECO 09075400 Page 2 of 534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado Station Status Station Type Date Time Variable Active Diversion 09/27/2021 03:00:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:30:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:30:00 AM DISCHRG Active Diversion 09/27/2021 03:30:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 02:45:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:30:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:15:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 02:45:00 AM DISCHRG1 Active Reservoir 09/27/2021 03:00:00 AM STORAGE Active Stream 10/01/2018 07:45:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:30:00 AM DISCHRG Rating being developed or revised Stream 09/27/2021 03:15:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 02:45:00 AM DISCHRG Active Reservoir 09/27/2021 03:15:00 AM STORAGE Active Stream 09/30/1999 12:00:00 AM DISCHRG Page 3 of 534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado Stage Amount Units Flag 0.8 CFS 0 CFS 0.63 9.21 CFS 9.06 CFS 1.5 3.73 CFS 0.01 0.35 CFS -0.49 0 CFS 0.76 9.92 CFS 7787.46 3730 AF 0 CFS 0.24 4.67 CFS -1.78 -888 CFS Rat 29.3 CFS 5413.12 124373 AF Page 4 of 534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado More Information https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/FUL3RTCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/TELSTOCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/LAWAUGCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/DWRDECCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/MORBSCCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/SANDUNCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/ARF27LCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/RIOBLACO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/JACRESCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/ROCAFOCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/BIGSPGCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/CLECROCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/PINAVACO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/HORTOOCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/CASCRECO Page 5 of 534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado Location Location UTM x UTM y Counties Accuracy (40.080048, -104.806719) 516480 4436659 GPS 1072 (38.438898, -104.820845) 515636.1 4254527.6 GPS 34 (38.10107, -102.604775) 710021 4219738 User supplied 1064 (39.812023, -104.96003) 503421.9 4406894.5 Digitized 82 (40.245525, -106.786656) 348036.2 4456539 Digitized 1066 (37.829732, -105.593644) 447760.4 4187088.6 User supplied 1067 (38.05065, -103.431037) 637661 4212596 1060 (37.203573, -106.812133) 339188 4118993 GPS 1396 (37.398753, -108.273512) 210223.2 4144139.3 GPS 1058 (38.707502, -104.846652) 513334.2 4284328.7 User supplied 1447 (37.734378, -105.663676) 441522.3 4176551.3 User supplied 83 (39.768512, -105.193688) 483412 4402081.5 User supplied 1008 (37.414726, -107.512791) 277624.2 4143844.3 User supplied 1011 (40.600539, -105.171379) 485501 4494428.2 GPS 1012 (39.193836, -106.83368) 341648.1 4339888.3 User supplied 1063 Page 6 of 534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado 5 37 EAGLE EAGLE R BLW WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AT AVON, CO 2 14 PUEBLO WELTON DITCH 1 2 WELD MEADOW ISLAND NO 1 DITCH 1 9 JEFFERSON BEAR CREEK RESERVOIR (OUTFLOW) 4 59 GUNNISON OHIO CREEK NEAR BALDWIN, CO. 1 7 CLEAR CREEK JONES PASS DELIVERY TO WEST FORK OF CLEAR CREEK 5 51 GRAND COLORADO RIVER BELOW BAKER GULCH NR GRAND LAKE, CO 2 19 LAS ANIMAS RED ROCK CANYON CREEK AT MOUTH NR THATCHER, CO. 2 79 SAGUACHE HUDSON DITCH 1 7 CLEAR CREEK BLUE DITCH PIPELINE 2 10 EL PASO RIPLEY DITCH FROM L. FOUNTAIN CR AT FT. CARSON, CO 3 35 COSTILLA TRINCHERA CREEK ABOVE TURNER'S RANCH 1 5 BOULDER PECK-PELLA AUGMENTATION RETURN 2 67 PROWERS MAY VALLEY BYPASS 6 58 GARFIELD BEAR RIVER BELOW BEAR LAKE 1 23 PARK SOUTH FORK OF SOUTH PLATTE ABOVE ANTERO 4 41 MONTROSE LOUTSENHIZER CANAL Page 7 of 534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado U.S. Geological Survey EAGAVOCO 09067020 Co. Division of Water Resources WLTDITCO Cooperative Program of CDWR, NCWCD & MEDIS1CO LSPWCD Co. Division of Water Resources BCROUTCO U.S. Geological Survey OHIBALCO 09113500 Co. Division of Water Resources GUMCLRCO U.S. Geological Survey COLBAKCO 09010500 U.S. Geological Survey REDTHACO 07126415 National Park Service (Station cooperator) HUDDITCO Co. Division of Water Resources BLUDITCO U.S. Geological Survey RIPDITCO 384047104510301 Co. Division of Water Resources TRITURCO 08240500 Co. Division of Water Resources PECRTNCO Co. Division of Water Resources MAYVBYCO Co. Division of Water Resources BERBBLCO City of Aurora (Station cooperator) SFKANTCO Co. Division of Water Resources LOUTCNCO Page 8 of 534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado Active Stream 09/27/2021 02:30:00 AM DISCHRG Active Diversion 09/27/2021 02:45:00 AM DISCHRG Active Diversion 09/27/2021 02:00:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:15:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:30:00 AM DISCHRG No gage height recorded, gage is closed for winter, seasonal site Diversion 09/27/2021 03:00:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:25:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 11/01/2020 01:45:00 AM DISCHRG Active Diversion 09/27/2021 03:15:00 AM DISCHRG Active Diversion 09/27/2021 03:00:00 AM DISCHRG Active Diversion 09/27/2021 02:45:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:15:00 AM DISCHRG Active Diversion 09/27/2021 02:00:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:15:00 AM DISCHRG Active Stream 09/27/2021 03:15:00 AM DISCHRG No gage height recorded, gage is closed for winter, seasonal site Stream 09/10/2021 11:45:00 AM DISCHRG Active Diversion 09/27/2021 03:30:00 AM DISCHRG Page 9 of 534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado 80.6 CFS 0.09 0.67 CFS 0.52 11.24 CFS 4.16 3.6 CFS 10.1 CFS 0.07 -999 CFS Ssn 15 CFS 0 CFS -0.04 0 CFS 0.39 CFS 0.13 CFS 3.28 8.01 CFS 0 CFS 0 CFS 0.49 16.8 CFS 1.3 12.3 CFS Ssn 6.39 99.5 CFS Page 10 of534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/EAGAVOCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/WLTDITCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/MEDIS1CO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/BCROUTCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/OHIBALCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/GUMCLRCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/COLBAKCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/REDTHACO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/HUDDITCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/BLUDITCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/RIPDITCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/TRITURCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/PECRTNCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/MAYVBYCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/BERBBLCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/SFKANTCO https://dwr.state.co.us/Tools/Stations/LOUTCNCO Page 11 of534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado (39.635005, -106.532516) 368489.3 4388368.9 User supplied 1446 (38.106413, -104.368706) 555346 4217810 GPS 34 (40.136326, -104.838582) 513752 4442900 User supplied 1072 (39.657347, -105.133693) 488532.5 4389735 User supplied 1008 (38.702219, -106.998391) 326226.1 4285627.3 User supplied 1005 (39.770842, -105.848619) 427321 4402667 1439 (40.325825, -105.856694) 427222.4 4464272.9 User supplied 1450 (37.5153, -103.725516) 612631.9 4152800.9 User supplied 1013 (37.869739, -105.444738) 460885 4191455 User supplied 1006 (39.728415, -105.517706) 455634.6 4397741.8 GPS 1439 (38.679724, -104.851379) 512928.5 4281245.7 User supplied 1447 (37.374463, -105.294313) 473942.6 4136454.5 User supplied 1441 (40.160705, -105.168471) 485654 4445607 GPS 85 (38.141867, -102.610344) 709416 4224253 GPS 1064 (40.044177, -107.071753) 323264 4434716 Digitized 1449 (39.070705, -105.97343) 415792.8 4325073 User supplied 1062 (38.437548, -107.861902) 250210 4258243 User supplied 32 Page 12 of534 09/27/2021 Current Surface Water Conditions in Colorado 3 20 UNKNOWN RIO GRANDE NEAR LOBATOS 1 8 JEFFERSON SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BELOW CHATFIELD RESERVOIR 1 5 BOULDER HIGHLAND DITCH AT LYONS, CO 3 20 RIO GRANDE BEAR CREEK NEAR SOUTH FORK 1 1 MORGAN DEUEL SNYDER CANAL 5 37 EAGLE HOMESTAKE RESERVOIR 2 16 HUERFANO LA VETA #1 RETURN FLOW 1 64 LOGAN SPRINGDALE DITCH 2 11 CHAFFEE MIDDLE COTTONWOOD CREEK BELOW RAINBOW LAKE 6 43 RIO BLANCO WHITE RIVER NEAR MEEKER, CO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AUGUST 20, 2020 Becky Leinweber Executive Director
    AUGUST 20, 2020 Becky Leinweber Executive Director Pikes Peak Outdoor Recreation Alliance LAST WEEK, PART ONE: Current Realities & Future Outlook of Recreation in the Pikes Peak Region WELCOME TO PART TWO: Successful Strategies for Sustainable Outdoor Recreation & Tourism THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS! Hosting Partner Summit Sponsor THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS! Devil’s Playground Sponsor Barr Camp Sponsor Media Sponsors David Leinweber Chairman Pikes Peak Outdoor Recreation Alliance TOP ISSUES FACING THE PIKES PEAK REGION’S OUTDOORS PIKES PEAK MULTI-USE PLAN Created: September 1999 Do we scrap this plan or complete it? Challenges? Opportunities! Chris Castilian Executive Director Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO) WELCOME Strategic Plan Open House Meeting Roadmap Celebrate GOCO 101 Proposed vision for2020 and beyond Survey: What do you think? Coming up… Southwest ConservationCorps GOCO Supported Projects in Rio Grande County MonteVista Community Sports Complex South Fork Rio Grande Park RiverValley Ranch/Rio Grande Legacy Colorado Wetlands InitiativeLegacy Ski-Hi Rodeo Arena &Grandstand renovation Del Norte Area Trails Master Plan Natural Wonders of the San Luis Valley Play Park Ski Hi Rodeo Arena GOCO’s Mission To help the people of Colorado preserve, protect, enhance, and manage the state’s wildlife, park, river, trails, and open space heritage. Rio Grande Healthy Living Park, Alamosa Lottery Beneficiaries 40% 50% or cap 10% “spillover” Funding Equally Across Program Areas Why We’re Here Today Chapman Park, Monte Vista What GOCOWants We want to
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO MAGAZINE Published Quarterly By
    THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published Quarterly by The State Historical Society of Colorado Vol. XXVlll Denver, Colorado, Apri l, 1951 Number 2 Pioneering Near Steamboat Springs-1885-1886 As Snowx rx LETTERS OF ALICE DENISOK On April 18, 1866, a nine-year-old lad named "William Denison, a native of Royalton, Vermont, wrote a letter to his father, George S. Denison, "·ho was away on a trip, saying: "vVill you buy me a pony? I don't want a Shetland pony because it is cross. I want an Indian pony. I have heard about them." Little did that lad dream that some day he would be riding a western Indian pony on a real round-up for his own cattle. But later, as a young man, he went in search of health and did ranch in Wyoming and Colorado. Toda)· a portrait1 of \Villiam Denison, from the old family homestead in Vermont, has a place of honor in the Public Library in Steamboat Springs. The William Denison Library, established in 1887 by the Denison family, as a memorial to " \Villie" Denison, was, according to an Old Timer, "the pride of Steamboat when it was established. It was a rallying point for the unfolding and intelligence of a struggling little settlement, and when the final total is cast up it will fill a higher niche in the archives of good accomplished than many of the magnificent piles of stone and marble that Carnegie has scattered over the land.' ' 2 From pioneer clays, members of the Denison family have been prominent in many phases of Colorado life.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining 100-Year Flood Flows for Approximate Floodplains in Colorado
    Guidelines For Determining 100-Year Flood Flows For Approximate Floodplains in Colorado Version 6.0 Department of Natural Resources Colorado Water Conservation Board Flood Protection Program 1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 Denver, Colorado 80203 www.cwcb.state.co.us June 2004 1 Guidelines For Determining 100-Year Flood Flows For Approximate Floodplains in Colorado Version 6.0 Prepared by: Thomas W. Browning, Colorado Water Conservation Board In cooperation with the Colorado Flood Hydrology Advisory Committee Department of Natural Resources Colorado Water Conservation Board Flood Protection Program 1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 Denver, Colorado 80203 www.cwcb.state.co.us June 2004 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The publication entitled Guidelines for Determining 100-Year Flood Flows for Approximate Floodplains in Colorado (Guidelines) was prepared by Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) staff as a tool for estimating 100-year flood discharges for approximate floodplains where detailed engineering analyses are limited or unavailable. The Guidelines are designed to provide a streamlined hydrologic procedure for use in the review and designation of approximate floodplain studies and mapping in Colorado. The Guidelines facilitate the estimation of 100-year flood discharges for approximate floodplains as required by the CWCB's technical standards. Many of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM’s) and Flood Hazard Boundary Maps (FHBM's) prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Flood Insurance Administration (FIA) include approximate floodplain delineations within Colorado. Those approximate delineations do not have detailed hydrologic information to accompany them and were therefore not previously designated and approved by the CWCB. However, Colorado statutes require that floodplain information to be used by local governments for land use and regulatory purposes must first be designated and approved by the CWCB.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Wetland Condition on the Rio Grande National Forest
    Assessment of Wetland Condition on the Rio Grande National Forest October 2012 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Assessment of Wetland Condition on the Rio Grande National Forest Prepared for: USDA Forest Service Rio Grande National Forest 1803 W. Highway 160 Monte Vista, CO 81144 Prepared by: Joanna Lemly Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 All photos taken by Colorado Natural Heritage Program Staff. Copyright © 2012 Colorado State University Colorado Natural Heritage Program All Rights Reserved EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Rio Grande National Forest (RGNF) covers 1.83 million acres in south central Colorado and contains the very headwaters of the Rio Grande River. The Forest’s diverse geography creates a template for equally diverse wetlands, which provide important ecological services to both the RGNF and lands downstream. Though now recognized as a vital component of the landscape, many wetlands have been altered by a range of human land uses since European settlement. Across the RGNF, mining, logging, reservoirs, water diversions, grazing, and recreation have all impacted wetlands. In order to adequately manage and protect wetland resources on the RGNF, reliable data are needed on their location, extent and condition. Between 2008 and 2011, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) partnered with Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) on a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) funded effort to map and assess the condition of wetlands throughout the Rio Grande Headwaters River Basin, which includes the RGNF. Existing paper maps of wetlands created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)’s National Wetland Inventory (NWI) program were converted to digital data by GIS Analysts at CPW.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine River Project D2
    Pine River Project Wm. Joe Simonds Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents The Pine River Project..........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Pre-Historic Era...................................................3 Historic Era ......................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................7 Construction History .....................................................8 Investigations.....................................................8 Construction......................................................8 Post Construction History ................................................14 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................18 Uses of Project Water ...................................................19 Conclusion............................................................20 About the Author .............................................................20 Bibliography ................................................................21 Archival Collections ....................................................21 Government Documents .................................................21 Magazine Articles ......................................................21 Correspondence ........................................................21 Other Sources..........................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Easement Rio Grande
    Fishing Easement Rio Grande When Izak colligates his complicacy hurry-skurry not someways enough, is Mahesh aneurismal? Colourless Quinn restate, his variations vermiculate wile awash. Unridable and totemic Neil placed almost reflexively, though Ikey spot-checks his ordinaries aromatizing. The Lower Rio Grande Flood emergency Project LRGFCP is located in boost the. Camping only one being so at one member of levee would allow motorized boats, bendway weirs have a false sense of the great commercial purposes. Addled eggs of northern aplomado falcons in the LRGV have been assessed for contaminants for many years. Seeks fine to develop depends on ranches, access by refuge project anticipate that follows most scenic or fishing easement rio grande cutthroat in. Gilmore Ranch, Bernalillo, which contributes almost twice as much play as most other. Local channel narrowing can occur. We prohibit fishing tackle restrictions for wildlife refuge located just downstream pool near high forest to learn about how effective. Rio Grande WSR Administrative History Appendix. This report of rio grande from rio grande? Craig to Axial Basin. It does a rio grande, dedicated funding for a day of coyote only during hunting on refuges. Reaches of competing over portions could slow running through many more. NHAs across the United States, domestic goats, many Federal and State agencies. Rgsm with ecosystem monitoring of take advantage is held by our larger scour. Puett reservoir remains within only full electrical, rio grande watershed is also contains a multitude of funds could be only at our summit reservoir. How many millionaires are in Texas? No design guidelines exist and the application of trench filled bendway weirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Vallecito Creek Near Bayfield, Colorado (09352900)
    Hydrologic Benchmark Network Stations in the West-Central U.S. 1963-95 (USGS Circular 1173-C) Abstract and Map List of all HBN Introduction to Analytical Index Stations Circular Methods Vallecito Creek near Bayfield, Colorado (09352900) This report details one of the approximately 50 stations in the Hydrologic Benchmark Network (HBN) described in the four-volume U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1173. The suggested citation for the information on this page is: Mast, M.A., and Turk, J.T., 1999, Environmental characteristics and water quality of Hydrologic Benchmark Network stations in the West- Central United States, 1963–95: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1173–C, 105 p. All of the tables and figures are numbered as they appear in each circular. Use the navigation bar above to view the abstract, introduction and methods for the entire circular, as well as a map and list of all of the HBN sites. Use the table of contents below to view the information on this particular station. Table of Contents 1. Site Characteristics and Land Use 2. Historical Water Quality Data and Time-Series Trends 3. Synoptic Water Quality Data 4. References and Appendices Site Characteristics and Land Use The Vallecito Creek HBN Basin is in the Southern Rocky Mountains physiographic province (Fenneman, 1946) in southwestern Colorado (Figure 4. Map showing study area of the Vallecito Creek Basin and photograph of the headwaters of Vallecito Creek, looking downstream into the basin). Vallecito Creek drains about 187 km2 of high- 1 Figure 4. Map showing study area of the Vallecito Creek Basin and photograph of the headwaters of Vallecito Creek, looking downstream into the basin 2 elevation, mountainous terrain in the San Juan Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of COLOKADO U
    Water-&t|fly and Irrigation taper No. 74 Series I, Irri*aite», 14 DEPARTMENT-OF THE INTEEIOE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR WATER RESOURCES OF THE STATE OF COLOKADO u/ BY flr O O 0) - '* O O 4/0 ^ CO ^ I fi O / J ,2: / * or * I r* iu ' WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1902 CONTENTS. ' Page. Letter of transmittal....-...............-..._.-........---.---.----...--- 7 Introduction ............................._..................--.-.------.- 9 Sources of information....................... ............................ 10 Value of supply.......................................................... 12 Eun-off................................................................... 14 Winter discharge -........-.---..-.....-...............--...-.-...-..-.--- 19 Explanation of tables..................................................... 20 Irrigation system.............................,...:....................... 20 South Platte division................................................. 21 Drainage ........................................................ 21 Stream measurements ............................................ 22 South Platte River at Cheesman Lake ......................... 23 South Platte River at Platte Canyon........................... 25 South Platte River at Denver ................................. 29 South Platte River at Orchard................................. 32 South Platte River at Julesburg ............................... 36 Bear Creek at Morrison....................................... 36 Clear
    [Show full text]
  • Classifications and Numeric Standards for Rio Grande Basin
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. November 12, 2020 Regulation No. 36 - Classifications and Numeric Standards for Rio Grande Basin Effective March 12, 2020 The following provisions are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes with these few exceptions: EPA has taken no action on: • All segment-specific total phosphorus (TP) numeric standards based on the interim value for river/stream segments with a cold water aquatic life classification (0.11 mg/L TP) or a warm water aquatic life classification (0.17 mg/L TP) • All segment-specific TP numeric standards based on the interim value for lake/reservoir segments with a warm water aquatic life classification (0.083 mg/L TP) Code of Colorado Regulations Secretary of State State of Colorado DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Control Commission REGULATION NO. 36 - CLASSIFICATIONS AND NUMERIC STANDARDS FOR RIO GRANDE BASIN 5 CCR 1002-36 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] 36.1 AUTHORITY These regulations are promulgated pursuant to section 25-8-101 et seq. C.R.S., as amended, and in particular, 25-8-203 and 25-8-204. 36.2 PURPOSE These regulations establish classifications and numeric standards for the Rio Grande Basin, including all tributaries and standing bodies of water as indicated in section 36.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Coolwater and Los Pinos CWPP Has Been Developed in Response to the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (HFRA)
    Coolwater and Los Pinos Community Wildfire Protection Plan October 2012 Prepared for: Coolwater and Los Pinos Subdivisions and Upper Pine River Fire Protection District Prepared by: Short Forestry, Mancos, Colorado Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 2. BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................ 2 A. Location................................................................................................................................. 2 B. Community............................................................................................................................ 2 C. Local Fire History ................................................................................................................ 3 D. Recent Wildfire Preparedness Activities............................................................................ 4 3. PLAN AREA.............................................................................................................................. 4 A. Boundaries ............................................................................................................................ 4 B. Private Land Characteristics............................................................................................... 5 C. Public Land Characteristics...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTERTHREE Affected Environment
    CHAPTERTHREE Affected Environment 3. Section 3 THREE Affected Environment In accordance with CEQ regulations for implementing NEPA codified in 40 CFR 1502.15, the Affected Environment sections discuss the existing conditions of the human and natural environment that could be impacted, beneficially or adversely, by the proposed alternatives. Baseline data were collected by reviewing existing documentation, consulting with various individuals and agencies, and conducting field inventories for some of the resources. 3.1 LAND USE Most of the land within the project corridor is classified as agricultural or rural residential. Concentrations of higher density, mixed development exist in three general locations: Grandview, particularly on US 160 from the CR 232 (west) intersection to the SH 172/CR 234 intersection, Gem Village, and Bayfield. Although most of the land along the corridor is privately owned, the ROW does pass through approximately 2.0 miles of land administered by the BLM. This BLM land is located in two separate locations: one 0.25-mile section is located in Grandview; and the second 1.75-mile section is located approximately 5.0 miles west of Bayfield and extends west along the ROW (Figure 3.1.1, BLM Parcels). The Grandview property is classified by the BLM as “disposal” property that may pass out of federal ownership through sale, exchange, or similar conveyance. The BLM manages these lands according to the guidelines contained in the San Juan/San Miguel Resource Management Plan (BLM 1985) and the Grandview Ridge Coordinated Resource Management Plan (BLM 2000). These lands are primarily used for grazing; however, there are also several ROWs, including the US 160 ROW, which the BLM granted to CDOT for construction of US 160 (BLM authorization COC 02801).
    [Show full text]
  • Conejos County Hazard Mitigation Plan
    0 2016 Conejos County Hazard Mitigation Plan Conejos County Town of Antonito Town of La Jara Town of Manassa Town of Romeo Town of Sanford Draft: April 17, 2017 1 Conejos County Hazard Mitigation Plan DRAFT: April 17, 2017 (Updated from original version prepared and approved in 2010) Prepared by: Conejos County Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Lead Agency: Conejos County Emergency Management In coordination with: San Luis Valley Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee (Alamosa, Conejos, Mineral, Rio Grande and Saguache Counties) With professional planning assistance from: Robert Wold Emergency Management Planning Services 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 6 Chapter 1 – Introduction 11 1.1 Purpose 11 1.2 Participating Jurisdictions 11 1.3 Background and Scope 11 1.4 Mitigation Planning Requirements 12 1.5 Grant Programs Requiring Hazard Mitigation Plans 12 1.6 Plan Organization 13 Chapter 2 – Community Profile 15 2.1 Geography and Climate 15 2.2 History 16 2.3 Population 17 2.4 Economy 18 2.5 Government 19 Chapter 3 – Planning Process 20 3.1 Plan Update Process 20 3.2 Multi-Jurisdictional Participation 21 3.3 10-Step Planning Process 22 3.4 Phase One: Organize Resources 22 3.5 Phase Two: Assess Risks 24 3.6 Phase Three: Develop the Mitigation Plan 25 3.7 Phase Four: Implement the Plan and Monitor Progress 26 Chapter 4 – Risk Assessment 27 4.1 Hazard Identification 28 4.1.1 Results and Methodology 28 4.1.2 Disaster Declaration History 30 4.2 Hazard Profiles 31 4.2.1 Hazard Profile Methodology 31 4.2.2 Flood 32 4.2.3 Wildfire 37 4.2.4 Hail
    [Show full text]