DOCSLIB.ORG

'Netaji's Life Was More Important Than the Legends and Myths' Page 1 of 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Netaji's Life Was More Important Than the Legends and Myths' Page 1 of 4 The Telegraph Page 1 of 4 Issue Date: Sunday , July 10 , 2011 ‘Netaji’s life was more important than the legends and myths’ Miami-based economist turned film-maker Suman Ghosh — who has also made a documentary on Amartya Sen — was in conversation with Sugata Bose, Netaji’s grandnephew, about the historian’s His Majesty’s Opponent — Subhas Chandra Bose and India’s Struggle Against Empire on the morning of the launch of the Penguin book. Metro sat in on the Netaji adda. Excerpts… Suman Ghosh: You are a direct descendent of Subhas Chandra Bose and your father (Sisir Kumar Bose) was involved in the freedom struggle with him. Did you worry about objectivity in treating a subject that was so close to you? Sugata Bose: I made a conscious decision to write this book as a historian. Not as a Sugata Bose speaks with (right) family member. My father always used to tell me that Netaji believed that his country and Suman Ghosh at Netaji Bhavan. family were coterminous. So if I’m a member of the Bose family by an accident of birth so Picture by Bishwarup Dutta are all of the people of India. In some ways, if there is a problem of objectivity it would apply to most people and scholars of the subcontinent. But I felt I had acquired the necessary critical distance from my subject to embark on this project when I did. Ghosh: Netaji has always been shrouded in myths and mysteries. He has primarily been characterised as a revolutionary and a warrior. This book introduced me to the visionary in Netaji. Any comments on that aspect? Bose: First of all, my primary motivating factor in writing the book was that I genuinely came to believe that Netaji's life was more important than the legend and the myths and mysteries surrounding him and this was making the new generation forget about what he was like as a human being. Secondly, I think we have a very one-dimensional perspective on Netaji as a warrior hero, which he was, but there are many other important dimensions to his personality. As you rightly point out, he was a visionary, a thinker. I have used his letters extensively to reconstruct his life and thought. He was a person with a philosophical bent of mind, interested in questions of culture, history and poetry in a deep way. And at the helm of Indian national politics he provides something of a blueprint for the social and economic reconstruction of India once freedom came. He believed freedom would come and we have to plan for the future. Ghosh: One thing you mention is Bose believed that after Indian independence an authoritarian rule was necessary for the social and economic transformation of India for a certain period of time, which I think would bother advocates of democracy. What are your thoughts on that? Bose: I think we need to look at Subhas Chandra Bose’s corpus of writings and speeches as a whole. I have noted that at least on three separate occasions, the final one being in a speech given to the faculty and students of Tokyo University in 1944, he did suggest that in order to bring about radical egalitarian social and economic reforms some measure of a strong centre may be needed, where he used the term ‘authoritarian’, for a period of 10 or 20 years. However, I have found that whenever he said that, even in his earlier writings, and there are two other essays that I cite, he was constantly qualifying that by saying ‘as soon as the machinery of the central of state has been put into operation we will then make sure that we give genuine administrative, economic, cultural autonomy to the federating units’. And if you look at some of his earlier writings and speeches, which are often not studied, for example he made a major speech in 1928 when he called for India to be a federal republic. So if our conception of democracy includes elements of genuine federalism then Subhas Chandra Bose was in fact a democrat and he kept insisting that democracy is not a western institution; it is a human institution. That we have certain values in our past which are conducive to us having a democratic system and with that he comes very close to Professor Amartya Sen who talks about the earlier history of public discussion in India, roots of Indian democracy and so forth. Ghosh: An interesting aspect of the book is the relationship between Rabindranath Tagore and Subhas Chandra Bose. Tagore was a continuous moral support and even wrote a letter on his behalf to Gandhi. There was a close affinity between them although Tagore was not in favour of the nation state as a political form… Bose: Subhas Chandra Bose was a great admirer of Rabindranath Tagore from his childhood. I’ve sighted letters that he wrote even before Tagore won the Nobel prize. He said that foreigners really respect him and we are not giving him the honour due to him. Then they travelled back together in 1921 after Subhas Chandra Bose had resigned from http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110710/jsp/others/print.html 8/19/2011 The Telegraph Page 2 of 4 the ICS. As you rightly note, they came closest in 1939 when Tagore wanted Bose to have Suman Ghosh and Sugata Bose in a second term as Congress president and when he resigned Tagore said, ‘Your temporary conversation at Netaji Bhavan. defeat will turn into a permanent victory’. He was the first to describe Netaji as the Picture by Bishwarup Dutta ‘Deshonayak’. Tagore of course had a critical perspective on nationalism or certainly the nation state; he did not want Indians to imitate the territorial model of a European nation state. My reading is that Subhas Chandra Bose may have been an uncompromising anti-imperialist but he was not an uncritical nationalist either…. So in terms of their thinking they may not have been that far apart but Bose was a political leader and activist in the nationalist movement. Tagore as a poet, philosopher could afford to be even more critical in his stance. Ghosh: In the Indian National Congress the likes of Vallabhai Patel, GD Birla and even Gandhi seemed to have ganged up against Netaji. Going by one quote of his in your book, “They were jealous of me”, I wonder what was the main point of difference. Was it only because of his insistence on purna swaraj as against Gandhi wanting a dominion status first? Bose: The issue of dominion status versus purna swaraj was dissolved by the late 1920s. Subhas Chandra Bose was always a step ahead of the other leaders of the Indian National Congress. The differences that developed in the late 1930s flowed from a number of factors. First, Subhas Chandra Bose wanted Gandhi to lead another mass movement against the British in 1939 and Gandhi kept saying that the country was not yet ready for such a movement. Second, there were differences about the future economic reconstruction of India. Subhas Chandra Bose wanted a more modern industrial India. There were many Gandhians who took a very different view. India living in the villages and so on, even though Subhas Chandra Bose included a Gandhian, JC Kumarappa, from the National Planning Committee. Third, he felt some Gandhians like Patel and GD Birla were prepared to make a compromise on federation with the princes and that would bring in the autocratic princes to come to balance the democratic aspirations in the British Indian provinces. Beyond all of that he thought there was a personal dimension as well. He did have as a young leader, popular appeal and as he wrote in a private letter to Emilie Schenkl that “they are jealous of me” he kept believing that his conflict was not so much with Gandhians or Gandhi but with self-professed followers of Gandhi. He tried his best to somehow reach an accommodation with Gandhi which he couldn’t in 1939 but I think we sometimes exaggerate the conflict between Gandhi and Bose because there was also a lot of mutual affection and respect and they certainly came close even though they never met in their ideas and strategies post-1942. After 1945, Gandhi came to genuinely admire what Netaji had achieved outside India. In 1939 when Tagore wanted Bose to have a Mahatma Gandhi was the quintessential In Southeast Asia Bose would go to the second term as Congress president and when patriarch.... He wanted those he adopted as meditation room of the Ramakrishna Mission he resigned Tagore said, ‘Your temporary his sons in the political sphere to obey and and obviously pray or meditate and then defeat will turn into a permanent victory’. He Subhas Chandra Bose was a little too come out feeling rejuvenated. But he never was the first to describe Netaji as the rebellious as an adopted son mentioned all of this in public ‘Deshonayak’ Ghosh: I had the feeling that Gandhi was a bit patronising and after 1945 it was easier to be generous about Bose… Bose: Mahatma Gandhi of course was the quintessential patriarch, whether in his public life or in his private life. He wanted those he adopted as his sons in the political sphere to obey and Subhas Chandra Bose was a little too rebellious as an adopted son and therefore there was a real conflict that took place in 1939. What you’re saying about post-1945 is not http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110710/jsp/others/print.html 8/19/2011 The Telegraph Page 3 of 4 something I can entirely agree with.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freedom in West Bengal Revised
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington Freedom and its Enemies: Politics of Transition in West Bengal, 1947-1949 * Sekhar Bandyopadhyay Victoria University of Wellington I The fiftieth anniversary of Indian independence became an occasion for the publication of a huge body of literature on post-colonial India. Understandably, the discussion of 1947 in this literature is largely focussed on Partition—its memories and its long-term effects on the nation. 1 Earlier studies on Partition looked at the ‘event’ as a part of the grand narrative of the formation of two nation-states in the subcontinent; but in recent times the historians’ gaze has shifted to what Gyanendra Pandey has described as ‘a history of the lives and experiences of the people who lived through that time’. 2 So far as Bengal is concerned, such experiences have been analysed in two subsets, i.e., the experience of the borderland, and the experience of the refugees. As the surgical knife of Sir Cyril Ratcliffe was hastily and erratically drawn across Bengal, it created an international boundary that was seriously flawed and which brutally disrupted the life and livelihood of hundreds of thousands of Bengalis, many of whom suddenly found themselves living in what they conceived of as ‘enemy’ territory. Even those who ended up on the ‘right’ side of the border, like the Hindus in Murshidabad and Nadia, were apprehensive that they might be sacrificed and exchanged for the Hindus in Khulna who were caught up on the wrong side and vehemently demanded to cross over.
    [Show full text]
  • Subhash Chandra Bose
    Subhash Chandra Bose drishtiias.com/printpdf/subhash-chandra-bose-3 Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose was a fierce nationalist, whose defiant patriotism made him one of the greatest freedom fighters in Indian history. He was also credited with setting up the Indian Army as a separate entity from the British Indian Army - which helped to propel the freedom struggle. Life Subhas Chandra Bose was born on 23rd January 1897, in Cuttack, Orissa Division, Bengal Province, to Prabhavati Dutt Bose and Janakinath Bose. After his early schooling, he joined Ravenshaw Collegiate School. From there he went to join Presidency College, Calcutta and was expelled due to his nationalist activities. Later, he went to University of Cambridge, U.K. In 1919, Bose headed to London to give the Indian Civil Services (ICS) examination and he was selected. Bose, however, resigned from Civil Services as he believed he could not side with the British. He was highly influenced by Vivekananda's teachings and considered him as his spiritual Guru. His political mentor was Chittaranjan Das. In 1921, Bose took over the editorship of the newspaper 'Forward', founded by Chittaranjan Das's Swaraj Party. In 1923, Bose was elected the President of the All India Youth Congress and also the Secretary of Bengal State Congress. He was also sent to prison in Mandalay in 1925 due to his connections with revolutionary movements where he contracted Tuberculosis. During the mid-1930s Bose travelled in Europe. He researched and wrote the first part of his book, The Indian Struggle, which covered the country’s independence movement in the years 1920–1934.
    [Show full text]
  • 03404349.Pdf
    UA MIGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT STUDY GROUP Jagdish M. Bhagwati Nazli Choucri Wayne A. Cornelius John R. Harris Michael J. Piore Rosemarie S. Rogers Myron Weiner a ........ .................. ..... .......... C/77-5 INTERNAL MIGRATION POLICIES IN AN INDIAN STATE: A CASE STUDY OF THE MULKI RULES IN HYDERABAD AND ANDHRA K.V. Narayana Rao Migration and Development Study Group Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 August 1977 Preface by Myron Weiner This study by Dr. K.V. Narayana Rao, a political scientist and Deputy Director of the National Institute of Community Development in Hyderabad who has specialized in the study of Andhra Pradesh politics, examines one of the earliest and most enduring attempts by a state government in India to influence the patterns of internal migration. The policy of intervention began in 1868 when the traditional ruler of Hyderabad State initiated steps to ensure that local people (or as they are called in Urdu, mulkis) would be given preferences in employment in the administrative services, a policy that continues, in a more complex form, to the present day. A high rate of population growth for the past two decades, a rapid expansion in education, and a low rate of industrial growth have combined to create a major problem of scarce employment opportunities in Andhra Pradesh as in most of India and, indeed, in many countries in the third world. It is not surprising therefore that there should be political pressures for controlling the labor market by those social classes in the urban areas that are best equipped to exercise political power.
    [Show full text]
  • Subhash Chandra Bose and His Discourses: a Critical Reading”, Thesis Phd, Saurashtra University
    Saurashtra University Re – Accredited Grade ‘B’ by NAAC (CGPA 2.93) Thanky, Peena, 2005, “Subhash Chandra Bose and his discourses: A Critical Reading”, thesis PhD, Saurashtra University http://etheses.saurashtrauniversity.edu/id/827 Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Saurashtra University Theses Service http://etheses.saurashtrauniversity.edu [email protected] © The Author SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE AND HIS DISCOURSES: A CRITICAL READING A THESIS SUBMITTED TO SAURASHTRA UNIVERSITY, RAJKOT FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy IN ENGLISH Supervised by: Submitted by: Dr. Kamal Mehta Mrs. Peena Thanky Professor, Sainik School, Smt. H. S. Gardi Institute of Balachadi. English & Comparative (Dist. Jamnagar) Literary Studies, Saurashtra University, Rajkot. 2005 1 SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSE 1897 - 1945 2 SMT. H. S. GARDI INSTITUTE OF ENGLISH & COMPARATIVE LITERARY STUDIES SAURASHTRA UNIVERSITY RAJKOT (GUJARAT) CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the work embodied in this thesis entitled "Subhash Chandra Bose and His Discourses : A Critical Reading" has been carried out by the candidate Mrs. Peena Thanky under my direct guidance and supervision for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Faculty of Arts of Saurashtra University, Rajkot.
    [Show full text]
  • 01720Joya Chatterji the Spoil
    This page intentionally left blank The Spoils of Partition The partition of India in 1947 was a seminal event of the twentieth century. Much has been written about the Punjab and the creation of West Pakistan; by contrast, little is known about the partition of Bengal. This remarkable book by an acknowledged expert on the subject assesses partition’s huge social, economic and political consequences. Using previously unexplored sources, the book shows how and why the borders were redrawn, as well as how the creation of new nation states led to unprecedented upheavals, massive shifts in population and wholly unexpected transformations of the political landscape in both Bengal and India. The book also reveals how the spoils of partition, which the Congress in Bengal had expected from the new boundaries, were squan- dered over the twenty years which followed. This is an original and challenging work with findings that change our understanding of parti- tion and its consequences for the history of the sub-continent. JOYA CHATTERJI, until recently Reader in International History at the London School of Economics, is Lecturer in the History of Modern South Asia at Cambridge, Fellow of Trinity College, and Visiting Fellow at the LSE. She is the author of Bengal Divided: Hindu Communalism and Partition (1994). Cambridge Studies in Indian History and Society 15 Editorial board C. A. BAYLY Vere Harmsworth Professor of Imperial and Naval History, University of Cambridge, and Fellow of St Catharine’s College RAJNARAYAN CHANDAVARKAR Late Director of the Centre of South Asian Studies, Reader in the History and Politics of South Asia, and Fellow of Trinity College GORDON JOHNSON President of Wolfson College, and Director, Centre of South Asian Studies, University of Cambridge Cambridge Studies in Indian History and Society publishes monographs on the history and anthropology of modern India.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Calcutta Killings Noakhali Genocide
    1946 : THE GREAT CALCUTTA KILLINGS AND NOAKHALI GENOCIDE 1946 : THE GREAT CALCUTTA KILLINGS AND NOAKHALI GENOCIDE A HISTORICAL STUDY DINESH CHANDRA SINHA : ASHOK DASGUPTA No part of this publication can be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the author and the publisher. Published by Sri Himansu Maity 3B, Dinabandhu Lane Kolkata-700006 Edition First, 2011 Price ` 500.00 (Rupees Five Hundred Only) US $25 (US Dollars Twenty Five Only) © Reserved Printed at Mahamaya Press & Binding, Kolkata Available at Tuhina Prakashani 12/C, Bankim Chatterjee Street Kolkata-700073 Dedication In memory of those insatiate souls who had fallen victims to the swords and bullets of the protagonist of partition and Pakistan; and also those who had to undergo unparalleled brutality and humility and then forcibly uprooted from ancestral hearth and home. PREFACE What prompted us in writing this Book. As the saying goes, truth is the first casualty of war; so is true history, the first casualty of India’s struggle for independence. We, the Hindus of Bengal happen to be one of the worst victims of Islamic intolerance in the world. Bengal, which had been under Islamic attack for centuries, beginning with the invasion of the Turkish marauder Bakhtiyar Khilji eight hundred years back. We had a respite from Islamic rule for about two hundred years after the English East India Company defeated the Muslim ruler of Bengal. Siraj-ud-daulah in 1757. But gradually, Bengal had been turned into a Muslim majority province.
    [Show full text]
  • Hist. 450: the Making of Modern South Asia (3 Credits)
    Hist. 450: The Making of Modern South Asia (3 Credits) (The agreement signed between Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and President J.R. Jayewardene, on the deployment of Indian Peace-Keeping Force (IPKF) to Sri Lanka, 1987, which would finally lead to Gandhi’s assassination in 1991 by a suicide bomber from the LTTE) Instructor: Dr. Mou Banerjee (Draft Syllabus, subject to changes at instructor’s discretion) Email: [email protected] Class Hours: Tuesday and Thursday, 9.30 – 10.45 AM, Humanities 1217. Office hours: Mosse Humanities Building, Room 4115: Thursday 12.30 -2.00 pm and by email appointment. Students are required to meet with me at least once by the end of the fourth week of the semester – please set up a meeting through email. Credit Hours: This 3-credit course meets as a group for 3 hours per week (according to UW- Madison's credit hour policy, each lecture counts as 1.5 hours). The course also carries the expectation that you will spend an average of at least 2 hours outside of class for every hour in the classroom. In other words, in addition to class time, plan to allot an average of at least 6 hours per week for reading, writing, preparing for discussions, and/or studying for quizzes and exams for this course. 1 Course Requirements: 1. This course is a historical introduction to the postcolonial history, political identity and political consciousness in the South Asian nation-states of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Myanmar. We shall study the evolution of modern South Asia and the intricate relationship between the neighboring sovereign states that emerged out of the partition of colonial India in 1947 and their interactions with their immediate postcolonial neighbors, through close readings of primary sources and relevant historiographical and theoretical literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Swap an Das' Gupta Local Politics
    SWAP AN DAS' GUPTA LOCAL POLITICS IN BENGAL; MIDNAPUR DISTRICT 1907-1934 Theses submitted in fulfillment of the Doctor of Philosophy degree, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1980, ProQuest Number: 11015890 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11015890 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract This thesis studies the development and social character of Indian nationalism in the Midnapur district of Bengal* It begins by showing the Government of Bengal in 1907 in a deepening political crisis. The structural imbalances caused by the policy of active intervention in the localities could not be offset by the ’paternalistic* and personalised district administration. In Midnapur, the situation was compounded by the inability of government to secure its traditional political base based on zamindars. Real power in the countryside lay in the hands of petty landlords and intermediaries who consolidated their hold in the economic environment of growing commercialisation in agriculture. This was reinforced by a caste movement of the Mahishyas which injected the district with its own version of 'peasant-pride'.
    [Show full text]
  • "1943: One Year, One Man and a World at War" on Subhas Chandra Bose and His Singapore Saga
    "1943: One Year, One Man and a World at War" on Subhas Chandra Bose and his Singapore saga Proudest Day - Netaji taking the Salute, MZ Kiami to his left - Singapore, July 5 1943 Seventy-five years ago, on July 4-5, 1943, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose accepted the leadership of the Indian independence movement and the Supreme Command of the To sign up for this Indian National Army in Singapore. At the beginning of the year event, he was in Europe, waiting to find a way to travel to Asia. He did kindlyRegister so by a perilous 90-day submarine voyage between February online. and May 1943. After proclaiming the Azad Hind (Free India) Government in Singapore on October 21, 1943, he would stand DATE on Indian soil in the Andaman island by December 1943. This 25 August 2018 richly illustrated lecture will focus on the historical significance (Saturday) of the saga of one man during one year amidst a world at war. TIME 3.00pm to 4.30pm Guest-of-Honor: HE Mr Jawed Ashraf VENUE High Commissioner of India to the Republic of Singapore. Singapore Management University OPENING REMARK Function Room 6.1 3:00 pm 81 Victoria Street K Kesavapany Level 6 Governor, Singapore International Foundation Singapore 188065 INTRODUCTION Nilanjana Sengupta 3:15 pm Author of A Gentleman's Word: The Legacy of Subhas Chandra Bose in Southeast Asia PRESENTATION Sugata Bose 3:30 pm Gardiner Professor of Oceanic History and Affairs at Harvard University 4:15 pm Q & A SESSION 4:30 pm NETWORKING & REFRESHMENTS Sugata Bose is the Gardiner Professor of Oceanic History and Affairs at Harvard University.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Subodh Mitra
    Indian Journal of History of Science, 44.2 (2009) 345-356 DR. SUBODH MITRA (1896-1961) - A VISIONARY OF CANCER TREATMENT AND RESEARCH IN INDIA* Dr.Subodh Mitra, one of the chief architects of cancer treatment and research in India, was a skilled surgeon, an erudite scholar and a dedicated social worker. He established two cancer institutes Chittaranjan Cancer Hospital (1950) and Chittaranjan National Cancer Research Centre (1957) in Calcutta. Dr Mitra made significant contribution in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, cancer surgery and radiobiology of cancer. He developed a new technique for surgical management of cancer of the female genital which became known and practiced worldwide as Mitra’s Operation. Key words: Subodh Mitra, Oncologist, Mitra’s Operation, Chittaranjan Cancer Hospital, Dr. Subodh Mitra, an illustrious son of Bengal was chief campaigner in the crusade against cancer with a missionary zeal and a pioneer in the field of Oncology in India for which he will forever be remembered by the Oncologists and Biomedical Scientific community of the country. Dr. Mitra had founded the Chittaranjan Cancer Hospital (CCH) and Chittaranjan National Cancer Research Centre, Calcutta, the second in line to the Tata Memorial Cancer Centre of Bombay. It is a sad state of affairs that the life and work of Dr. Subodh Mitra has not been documented properly although an effort was made during his birth centenary in 1996-97. It is therefore a responsibility to recapitulate, research and record the contribution of Dr. Mitra to the development of cancer treatment and research in India for historical reasons as well as to inspire Oncologists of future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Love in the Time Of
    Love in the Time of War Subhas Chandra Bose’s Journeys to Nazi Germany (1941) and towards the Soviet Union (1945) The political career of Subhas Chandra Bose has been the subject of much research and debate, drawn from material on his public life. This article weaves together the public and the private at critical junctures of Bose’s career to offer alternative explanatory factors for two famous journeys made by Bose. The first journey was Bose’s escape from India to Nazi Germany in 1941 and the second journey was his flight from south-east Asia in 1945, a journey that was to prove his last. Looking at these ‘public’ actions in the light of ‘private’ reality, this article argues that while public, political factors did motivate Bose to undertake these journeys, he was also moved by powerful personal reasons. SARMILA BOSE I In a private letter of January 4, 1939, however, Bose seemed A Political Crisis to be expressing an entirely different perspective. He wrote, “In a way, it will be good not to be president again. I shall then be he year was 1939, Subhas Chandra Bose was standing for more free and have more time to myself.” The letter was written re-election as the president of the Indian National Con- to Emilie Schenkl in Vienna. Bose added, ‘Und wie geht es Ihnen, Tgress. It was an unprecedented event. The Indian National meine Liebste? Ich denke immer an Sie bei Tag und bei Nacht.’ Congress was not used to elections. Rather, as a number of Congress (And how are you, my dearest? I think of you all the time by Working Committee members
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmir : Roots of Conflict, Paths to Peace
    KASHMIR KASHMIR ROOTS OF CONFLICT, PATHS TO PEACE Sumantra Bose HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England 2003 Copyright © 2003 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College all rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bose, Sumantra, 1968– Kashmir : roots of conflict, paths to peace / Sumantra Bose. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-674-01173-2 (alk. paper) 1. Jammu and Kashmir (India)—History—19th century. 2. Jammu and Kashmir (India)—Politics and government—19th century. 3. India—Foreign relations—Pakistan. 4. Pakistan—Foreign relations—India. I. Title. DS485.K23B67 2003 954′.6—dc21 2003049919 For the people of Jammu and Kashmir and in honor of Subhas Chandra Bose (1897–1945) Sarat Chandra Bose (1889–1950) Sisir Kumar Bose (1920–2000) CONTENTS Maps viii Introduction 1 1. Origins of the Conflict 14 2. The Kashmir-India Debacle 44 3. The War in Kashmir 102 4. Sovereignty in Dispute 164 5. Pathways to Peace 201 Notes 267 Glossary 291 Acknowledgments 299 Index 301 XINJIANG S H K U î D U K Khunjerab Pass I N A H R A Area ceded by K Pakistan to O China in 1963 Baltit Á R S A h ak M sg am Gilgit Á R NORTHERN AREAS A Indus D Boundary claimed by India; E de facto provincial bound- O ary for Pakistan S A Skardu Á NORTH-WEST I FRONTIER M T PROVINCE N S . IR M H H S A Á Kargil K K I MUZAFFARABAD Á Wular A Lake S & ÁSopore Abbottabad Jhel Baramulla H Zojila î M Á um Á M Pass U I R ÁSRINAGAR M Jhelum A M V P A A ÁPoonch I L J ÁAnantnag ISLAMABADÁ R L Á E L ” P Rawalpindi A Y D N J î A Á Rajouri A Banihal Pass A Z L R A C A “ he N Mangla Á nab G J E Dam Mirpur A U Jhelum M M Á ÁUdhampur ÁAkhnur ÁJAMMU Jhelum ÁChamba b na Á he Sialkot Kathua PUNJAB C Á Á ot nk tha HIMAC Pa TURKMEN- T U.
    [Show full text]