DOCSLIB.ORG

In Vitro Selection for Catalytic Activity with Ribosome Display Patrick Amstutz,† Joelle N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Vitro Selection for Catalytic Activity with Ribosome Display Patrick Amstutz,† Joelle N Published on Web 07/17/2002 In Vitro Selection for Catalytic Activity with Ribosome Display Patrick Amstutz,† Joelle N. Pelletier,†,‡ Armin Guggisberg,§ Lutz Jermutus,†,⊥ Sandro Cesaro-Tadic,† Christian Zahnd,† and Andreas Plu¨ckthun*,† Biochemisches Institut, UniVersita¨tZu¨rich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zu¨rich, Switzerland, and Organisch-Chemisches Institut der UniVersita¨tZu¨rich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zu¨rich, Switzerland Received February 8, 2002 Abstract: We report what is, to our knowledge, the first in vitro selection for catalytic activity based on catalytic turnover by using ribosome display, a method which does not involve living cells at any step. RTEM-â-lactamase was functionally displayed on ribosomes as a complex with its encoding mRNA. We designed and synthesized a mechanism-based inhibitor of â-lactamase, biotinylated ampicillin sulfone, appropriate for selection of catalytic activity of the ribosome-displayed â-lactamase. This derivative of ampicillin inactivated â-lactamase in a specific and irreversible manner. Under appropriate selection conditions, active RTEM-â-lactamase was enriched relative to an inactive point mutant over 100-fold per ribosome display selection cycle. Selection for binding, carried out with â-lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP), gave results similar to selection with the suicide inhibitor, indicating that ribosome display is similarly efficient in catalytic activity and affinity selections. In the future, the capacity to select directly for enzymatic activity using an entirely in vitro process may allow for a significant increase in the explorable sequence space relative to existing strategies. Naturally occurring enzymes catalyze a wide variety of selection methods sample the entire library in a single experi- chemical reactions and are increasingly used in pharmaceutical, mental step. Such experiments require a direct coupling of the industrial, and environmental applications as a result of their phenotype, which is to be selected for, and its encoding genetic high reactivities and specificities. However, the direct improve- information, the genotype. ment of biocatalysts remains challenging, and the yet more For the selection of enzymatic activities, three general ambitious goal of developing enzymes with new catalytic approaches can be distinguished: methods performed entirely functions still seems almost elusive. Although our knowledge in vivo, those working “partially” in vitro, and those performed of structure-function relationships of enzymes has significantly completely in vitro.1 In the in vivo approach, a genetic library increased, rational protein design is still a difficult task, encoding enzyme variants is transformed into cells where the especially for improved catalysis. The recently developed variants are expressed and selection takes place. Because strategy of directed evolution can be used as a complement to selection protocols are generally based on a growth advantage, rational design. In directed evolution, a protein function of e.g. complementation of an auxotrophy or resistance to a interest is evolved in the laboratory by mimicking Darwinian cytotoxic compound,5-8 in vivo selection of catalysis is limited evolution in multiple successive rounds of diversification (library to those activities giving rise to a growth advantage. Moreover, generation) with subsequent selection or screening (reviewed microbial genomes have evolved to deal with environmental in refs 1-3). selection pressure. The expression host can therefore be surpris- Screening, which involves the analysis of single protein ingly “creative” in escaping selection pressure, such as by higher variants, can be automated for high-throughput protocols but expression of a poor catalyst or the use of alternative metabolic remains laborious and time-consuming, therefore limiting the pathways, completely by-passing the enzymatic activity that is size of libraries which can be handled.4 As opposed to screening, the actual target of selection. Partially in vitro methods can offer an alternative to in vivo * Corresponding author. Tel. (+41-1) 635 55 70. Fax: (+41-1) 635 57 12. E-mail: [email protected]. methods. In these methods, the library is also introduced into † Biochemisches Institut, Universita¨t Zu¨rich. cells, resulting in display of the protein of interest, usually on § Organisch-Chemisches Institut der Universita¨t Zu¨rich. the surface of phage,9 bacteria, or yeast.10 Selection then occurs ‡ Present address: De´partement de Chimie, Universite´ de Montre´al, C. P. 6128, Succursale Centre-ville, Montre´al, PQ, Canada. ⊥ (5) Orencia, M. C.; Yoon, J. S.; Ness, J. E.; Stemmer, W. P.; Stevens, R. C. Present address: Cambridge Antibody Technology, The Science Park, Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 238-242. Melbourn, Cambridgeshire SG8 6JJ, U.K. (6) Altamirano, M. M.; Blackburn, J. M.; Aguayo, C.; Fersht, A. R. Nature (1) Griffiths, A. D.; Tawfik, D. S. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 338- 2000, 403, 617-622. Retraction, Nature 2002, 417, 468. 353. (7) Crameri, A.; Raillard, S. A.; Bermudez, E.; Stemmer, W. P. Nature 1998, (2) Olsen, M.; Iverson, B.; Georgiou, G. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 391, 288-291. 331-337. (8) MacBeath, G.; Kast, P.; Hilvert, D. Science 1998, 279, 1958-1961. (3) Soumillion, P.; Fastrez, F. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001, 12, 387-394. (9) Dunn, I. S. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1996, 7, 547-553. (4) Joo, H.; Lin, Z.; Arnold, F. H. Nature 1999, 399, 670-673. (10) Mendelsohn, A. R.; Brent, R. Science 1999, 284, 1948-1950. 9396 9 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2002, 124, 9396-9403 10.1021/ja025870q CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society In Vitro Selection of a Displayed Enzyme ARTICLES in vitro, that is, outside the cell, allowing fine-tuning of the selection pressure and selection conditions. Both entirely in vivo or partially in vitro techniques require a transformation step, limiting the applicable library size to cellular transformation efficiencies. Typically, transformation efficiencies of 107-108 cells/µg DNA for yeast and 109-1010 cells/µg DNA for Escherichia coli (E. coli)11,12 are achievable. A considerable amount of work arises from the need of ligating and transforming such a library after each round of randomiza- tion. Furthermore, cytotoxic proteins cannot be displayed at all. Technologies working completely in vitro can overcome these limitations, because no living cells are involved at any step. Two approaches that are carried out completely in vitro can be distinguished. In one, a compartmentalization of individual variants is achieved in water-in-oil emulsions.13 Since the in Figure 1. Principle of ribosome display selection for catalytic activity. situ detection of fluorescent products and direct optical sorting DNA encoding the protein of interest is transcribed and translated in vitro. of such droplets, harboring the catalytic proteins, have not yet Because the mRNA carries no stop codon and translation is stopped with been reported, the physical link between genotype and pheno- high Mg2+ concentrations, stable ternary complexes of mRNA (black), type is still required, and the emulsions have to be broken up ribosome (blue) and tethered nascent protein (red) are formed. These can be used directly for selection with a biotinylated suicide inhibitor. Excess before an affinity selection or sorting can be performed. The inhibitor is removed by gel filtration, and the labeled complexes are captured other approach makes use of the concomitant presence of mRNA with avidin coated magnetic beads. After washing to remove any untrapped and nascent protein at the ribosome during an in vitro translation ribosomal complexes, the selected complexes are destroyed to elute the 14 mRNA. Finally, reverse transcription (RT) and PCR are used to amplify for coupling of genotype and phenotype. Here, the most the genetic information of the selected clones. prominent techniques are ribosome display;15,16 mRNA display, 17 - 18 also termed “in vitro virus” or “mRNA protein fusion”; and active enzyme was enriched relative to less active mutants and 19 “ribosome-inactivation display system”. Below, we will relative to penicillin binding protein. The elution of covalently describe the first application of ribosome display to the selection trapped clones from the matrix to which they had been linked of catalytic activity in an effort to increase the library sizes is generally achieved by cleaving within a linker region, either accessible beyond those in previously published accounts with chemically between the suicide inhibitor and the affinity tag or in vivo or partially in vitro methods. enzymatically between the displayed protein and the phage. To select catalysts in vitro, catalysis must be correlated or Even though entirely in vitro display techniques have great coupled to binding. Although reversible binding of enzymes to potential for selection of catalytic activity, this has not previously transition state analogues has been used frequently in the been reported. We believe that ribosome display is particularly 20,21 selection of novel catalysts, a more direct selection for well suited to applications based on mechanism-based inhibition, enzymatic turnover can be achieved by the use of mechanism- because ribosome display offers an elegant solution for elution 22 based (or “suicide”) inhibitors. These compounds are substrate of the selected genetic information. Because genotype and analogues that, upon turnover, are converted into a reactive phenotype are coupled
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nilsson C. L. (Ed.)
    Else_AT-NILSSON_prelims.qxd 6/8/2007 06:29 PM Page i Lectins Analytical Technologies This page intentionally left blank Else_AT-NILSSON_prelims.qxd 6/8/2007 06:29 PM Page iii Lectins Analytical Technologies Edited by Carol L. Nilsson National High Magnetic Field Laboratory Florida State University Tallahassee, FL, USA Amsterdam – Boston – Heidelberg – London – New York – Oxford – Paris San Diego – San Francisco – Singapore – Sydney – Tokyo Else_AT-NILSSON_prelims.qxd 6/8/2007 06:29 PM Page iv Elsevier Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK First edition 2007 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (+44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (+44) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected]. Alternatively you can submit your request online by visiting the Elsevier web site at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions, and selecting Obtaining permission to use Elsevier material Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the
    [Show full text]
  • M.Sc. [Botany] 346 13
    cover page as mentioned below: below: mentioned Youas arepage instructedcover the to updateupdate to the coverinstructed pageare asYou mentioned below: Increase the font size of the Course Name. Name. 1. IncreaseCourse the theof fontsize sizefont ofthe the CourseIncrease 1. Name. use the following as a header in the Cover Page. Page. Cover 2. the usein the followingheader a as as a headerfollowing the inuse the 2. Cover Page. ALAGAPPAUNIVERSITY UNIVERSITYALAGAPPA [Accredited with ’A+’ Grade by NAAC (CGPA:3.64) in the Third Cycle Cycle Third the in (CGPA:3.64) [AccreditedNAAC by withGrade ’A+’’A+’ Gradewith by NAAC[Accredited (CGPA:3.64) in the Third Cycle and Graded as Category–I University by MHRD-UGC] MHRD-UGC] by University and Category–I Graded as as Graded Category–I and University by MHRD-UGC] M.Sc. [Botany] 003 630 – KARAIKUDIKARAIKUDI – 630 003 346 13 EDUCATION DIRECTORATEDISTANCE OF OF DISTANCEDIRECTORATE EDUCATION BIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES IN BOTANY I - Semester BOTANY IN TECHNIQUES BIOLOGICAL M.Sc. [Botany] 346 13 cover page as mentioned below: below: mentioned Youas arepage instructedcover the to updateupdate to the coverinstructed pageare asYou mentioned below: Increase the font size of the Course Name. Name. 1. IncreaseCourse the theof fontsize sizefont ofthe the CourseIncrease 1. Name. use the following as a header in the Cover Page. Page. Cover 2. the usein the followingheader a as as a headerfollowing the inuse the 2. Cover Page. ALAGAPPAUNIVERSITY UNIVERSITYALAGAPPA [Accredited with ’A+’ Grade by NAAC (CGPA:3.64) in the Third Cycle Cycle Third the in (CGPA:3.64) [AccreditedNAAC by withGrade ’A+’’A+’ Gradewith by NAAC[Accredited (CGPA:3.64) in the Third Cycle and Graded as Category–I University by MHRD-UGC] MHRD-UGC] by University and Category–I Graded as as Graded Category–I and University by MHRD-UGC] M.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vivo Mrna Display Enables Large-Scale Proteomics by Next Generation Sequencing
    In vivo mRNA display enables large-scale proteomics by next generation sequencing Panos Oikonomoua,b,c,1, Roberto Salatinob, and Saeed Tavazoiea,b,c,1 aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; bDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032; and cDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, NY10032 Edited by Jack W. Szostak, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, and approved August 25, 2020 (received for review February 11, 2020) Large-scale proteomic methods are essential for the functional between genotype and phenotype, whereby a protein or peptide characterization of proteins in their native cellular context. How- is linked to its encoding nucleic acid. For example, in phage ever, proteomics has lagged far behind genomic approaches in display, the nucleic acid encoding the capsid displayed peptide is scalability, standardization, and cost. Here, we introduce in vivo contained within the phage (33). The resulting collection of mRNA display, a technology that converts a variety of proteomics displayed peptides can be used for the in vitro characterization of applications into a DNA sequencing problem. In vivo-expressed protein interactions, protein engineering, and selection of human proteins are coupled with their encoding messenger RNAs antibody fragment libraries (34–36). Alternative in vitro methods (mRNAs) via a high-affinity stem-loop RNA binding domain inter- linking nucleotide information to phenotype include mRNA action, enabling high-throughput identification of proteins with display (37, 38), ribosome display (39), and yeast display (40). In high sensitivity and specificity by next generation DNA sequenc- the past decade, many of these technologies have been coupled ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Protein Therapeutics Through Quantitative Molecular Engineering Approaches and a Cell-Based Oral Delivery Platform
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2013 Improving Protein Therapeutics Through Quantitative Molecular Engineering Approaches and A Cell-Based Oral Delivery Platform Ting Wun Ng University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Biomedical Commons Recommended Citation Ng, Ting Wun, "Improving Protein Therapeutics Through Quantitative Molecular Engineering Approaches and A Cell-Based Oral Delivery Platform" (2013). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 784. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/784 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/784 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Improving Protein Therapeutics Through Quantitative Molecular Engineering Approaches and A Cell-Based Oral Delivery Platform Abstract Proteins, with their ability to perform a variety of highly specific biological functions, have emerged as an important class of therapeutics. However, to fully harness their therapeutic potential, proteins often need to be optimized by molecular engineering; therapeutic efficacy can be improved by modulating protein properties such as binding affinity/specificity, half-life, bioavailability, and immunogenicity. In this work, we first present an introductory example in which a mechanistic mathematical model was used to improve target selection for directed evolution of an aglycosylated Fc domain of an antibody to enhance
    [Show full text]
  • EURL ECVAM Recommendation on Non-Animal-Derived Antibodies
    EURL ECVAM Recommendation on Non-Animal-Derived Antibodies EUR 30185 EN Joint Research Centre This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. For information on the methodology and quality underlying the data used in this publication for which the source is neither Eurostat nor other Commission services, users should contact the referenced source. EURL ECVAM Recommendations The aim of a EURL ECVAM Recommendation is to provide the views of the EU Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing (EURL ECVAM) on the scientific validity of alternative test methods, to advise on possible applications and implications, and to suggest follow-up activities to promote alternative methods and address knowledge gaps. During the development of its Recommendation, EURL ECVAM typically mandates the EURL ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC) to carry out an independent scientific peer review which is communicated as an ESAC Opinion and Working Group report. In addition, EURL ECVAM consults with other Commission services, EURL ECVAM’s advisory body for Preliminary Assessment of Regulatory Relevance (PARERE), the EURL ECVAM Stakeholder Forum (ESTAF) and with partner organisations of the International Collaboration on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM). Contact information European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Chemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit (F3) Address: via E.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Ribosome Display
    Chapter 1 Ribosome Display: A Perspective Andreas Plückthun Abstract Ribosome display is an in vitro evolution technology for proteins. It is based on in vitro translation, but prevents the newly synthesized protein and the mRNA encoding it from leaving the ribosome . It thereby couples phenotype and genotype. Since no cells need to be transformed, very large libraries can be used directly in selections, and the in vitro amplifi cation provides a very convenient integration of random mutagenesis that can be incorporated into the procedure. This review highlights concepts, mechanisms, and different variations of ribosome display and compares it to related methods. Applications of ribosome display are summarized, e.g., the directed evolution of proteins for higher binding affi nity, for higher stability or other improved biophysical parameters and enzymatic properties. Ribosome display has developed into a robust technology used in academia and industry alike, and it has made the cell-free Darwinian evolution of proteins over multiple generations a reality. Key words: Directed evolution , Cell-free translation, Ribosome display , Protein engineering, Antibody engineering , DARPins , Designed ankyrin repeat proteins , Affi nity maturation 1. Introduction: Ribosome Display in Context All technologies of molecular evolution must couple phenotype and genotype. There are two fundamental possibilities for achieving this. The fi rst one is compartmentalization. Nature’s compartments are cells: they secure that the superior phenotype expressed by one cell’s mutant genotype can be replicated, without the gene products from the wild type interfering. All selections based on microbial phenotypes use this principle. The second possibility is a direct physical coupling of genetic material to the protein product.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Translation Initiation Sequences Using in Vitro Yeast Ribosome Display
    ARTICLE Evolution of Translation Initiation Sequences Using In Vitro Yeast Ribosome Display Rui Gan,1 Michael C. Jewett1,2,3,4 1 Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208 2 Chemistry of Life Processes Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 3 Member, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 4 Simpson Querrey Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; fax: 847-491-3728; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction ABSTRACT: We report a novel in vitro yeast ribosome display method based on cell-free protein synthesis (CFPS) using linear The ability to regulate gene expression is critical to bioengineering DNA templates. We demonstrate that our platform can enrich a applications. Over the last few decades, many different regulatory target gene from a model library by 100-fold per round of selection. strategies have been used to control the expression of toxic proteins We demonstrate the utility of our approach by evolving cap- in hosts, to maximize yield of recombinant proteins, and to tune the independent translation initiation (CITI) sequences, which result in expression of key enzymes in metabolic pathways in order to a 13-fold increase in CFPS yields after four rounds of selection, and fi balance the flux of metabolites (Farmer and Liao, 2000; Jones et al., a threefold further increase by placing the bene cial short fi sequences in tandem. We also show that 12 of the selected CITI 2000; Kim and Keasling, 2001). Recently, rapid progress in the eld sequences permit precise control of gene expression in vitro over a of synthetic biology has enabled de novo metabolic pathway design, range of up to 80-fold by enhancing translation (and not as cryptic genetic circuit construction, and artificial genome synthesis promoters).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Mrna Display
    8 Chapter 2 mRNA Display: Ligand Discovery, Interaction Analysis and Beyond This work has been adapted from the following publication: Takahashi, T.T., Austin, R.J. and Roberts, R.W. mRNA display: ligand discovery, interaction analysis and beyond. (2003) Trends Biochem Sci 28, 159-165. 9 Abstract In vitro peptide and protein selection using mRNA display* enables the discovery and directed evolution of new molecules from combinatorial libraries. These selected molecules can serve as tools to control and understand biological processes, enhance our understanding of molecular interactions, and potentially treat disease in therapeutic applications. In mRNA display, mRNA molecules are covalently attached to the peptide or protein they encode. These mRNA-protein fusions enable in vitro selection of peptide and protein libraries of more than 1013 different sequences. mRNA display has been used to discover novel peptide and protein ligands for RNA, small molecules, and proteins, as well as to define cellular interaction partners of proteins and drugs. In addition, several unique applications are possible with mRNA display, including self-assembling protein chips and library construction with unnatural amino acids, and chemically modified peptides. *mRNA display has been referred to as mRNA-protein fusions (1), in vitro virus and in vitro virus virion (2), and PROfusionTM technology (3). 10 Introduction Functional approaches, such as in vitro selection, currently provide the best means available for isolating peptides and proteins with desired chemical or biochemical properties. Over the last decade, display technologies have been essential tools in the discovery of peptide and protein ligands and in delineating in vivo interaction partners. The phage (4) and ribosome display systems (5) have been principally used for discovery, while the yeast two-hybrid method (6) has been used for in vivo interaction analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Surface Display
    40 Cell Surface Display Sharadwata Pan and Michael K. Danquah Monash University Australia 1. Introduction The manipulation of the cell surfaces of prokaryotes (mainly bacteria) and eukaryotes (such as Yeast) has manifested to be an area of stupendous ongoing research, with intelligent widespread applications spanning different arenas of biological sciences (Charbit et al., 1988; Cruz et al., 2000; Francisco et al., 1993; Götz, 1990; Jostock & Dübel, 2005; Keskinkan et al., 2004; Kotrba et al., 1999; Lee & Schnaitman, 1980; Liljeqvist et al., 1997; Martineau et al., 1991; Mizuno et al., 1983; Sousa et al., 1996; Taschner et al., 2002; Wernérus & Ståhl, 2004; Willett et al., 1995; Xu & Lee, 1999). Till date, majority of the surface display systems developed for Gram-negative bacteria involve introducing external peptides into surface-approachable loops of naturally displayed proteins. This sometimes put extreme size restrictions on the displayed components (Wernérus & Ståhl, 2004). However, this problem is more or less resolved since larger proteins could be inserted through some recently developed bacterial display systems for Gram-negative bacteria (Charbit et al., 1988; Cruz et al., 2000; Lee & Schnaitman, 1980; Mizuno et al., 1983; Xu & Lee, 1999). Thanks to some tireless research, it is now evident that the structural properties of the cell wall in Gram-positive bacteria, i.e. the thick peptidoglycan layer, make them suitable candidates for strict laboratory procedures and demanding field applications (Jostock & Dübel, 2005). On the other hand, lower transformation efficiency has been a significant disadvantage of using Gram-positive bacteria (Wernérus & Ståhl, 2004), considering if someone is working with surface-displayed conjunctional libraries for affinity-based selections.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Selection of Peptides and Proteins Advantages of Mrna
    pubs.acs.org/synthbio Review In Vitro Selection of Peptides and ProteinsAdvantages of mRNA Display Matilda S. Newton, Yari Cabezas-Perusse, Cher Ling Tong, and Burckhard Seelig* Cite This: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00419 Read Online ACCESS Metrics & More Article Recommendations ABSTRACT: mRNA display is a robust in vitro selection technique that allows the selection of peptides and proteins with desired functions from libraries of trillions of variants. mRNA display relies upon a covalent linkage between a protein and its encoding mRNA molecule; the power of the technique stems from the stability of this link, and the large degree of control over experimental conditions afforded to the researcher. This article describes the major advantages that make mRNA display the method of choice among comparable in vivo and in vitro methods, including cell-surface display, phage display, and ribosomal display. We also describe innovative techniques that harness mRNA display for directed evolution, protein engineering, and drug discovery. KEYWORDS: protein engineering, in vitro selection, mRNA display, phage display, unnatural amino acids, ribosome display mRNA display is an in vitro selection and directed evolution technique that enables the screening of trillions of protein variants for desired functions in a single experiment. In directed evolution, researchers working to alter binding or catalytic properties of a target protein or peptide have a range of in vitro and in vivo techniques at their disposal to isolate their desired variant from large mixtures of variants. The goal of this review is to highlight the unique advantages of mRNA display that make this method superior to most other directed evolution techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutives Protein-Design Eines „Anticalins“ Mit Bindungsspezifität Für Digoxigenin
    Lehrstuhl für Biologische Chemie Forschungsdepartment für Biowissenschaftliche Grundlagen Evolutives Protein-Design eines „Anticalins“ mit Bindungsspezifität für Digoxigenin Dipl.-Ing. Steffen Schlehuber Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. J. Friedrich Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. A. Skerra 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. H. Klostermeyer, emeritiert Die Dissertation wurde am 12.10.2001 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt am 06.12.2001 angenommen. Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde in der Abteilung Proteinchemie am Institut für Biochemie, Fachbereich Chemie, der Technischen Universität Darmstadt begonnen und am Lehrstuhl für Biologische Chemie im Forschungsdepartment für Biowissenschaftliche Grundlagen am Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt der Techni- schen Universität München weitergeführt und abgeschlossen. Herrn Prof. Dr. A. Skerra danke ich für die interessante und vielseitige Themenstellung, für zahlreiche inspirierende Diskussionen sowie das stete Interesse am Fortgang und Erfolg meiner Arbeit. Meinen Kolleginnen und Kollegen der Abteilung Proteinchemie und des Lehrstuhls für Biolo- gische Chemie danke ich für ihre Hilfsbereitschaft und das ausgezeichnete
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Basis for Selective Stalling of Human Ribosome Nascent Chain
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/315325; this version posted January 9, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Title: Structural basis for selective stalling of human ribosome nascent chain complexes by a drug-like molecule Authors: Wenfei Li1,2, Fred R. Ward1, Kim F. McClure3, Stacey Tsai-Lan Chang1, Elizabeth Montabana2, Spiros Liras3, Robert Dullea4 and Jamie H. D. Cate1,2,5* 1Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. 2Molecular Biophysics and Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. 3Pfizer Medicinal Chemistry, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States of America. 4Cardiovascular, Metabolic and Endocrine Disease Research Unit, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States of America. 5Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. *e-mail: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/315325; this version posted January 9, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Li et al. Abstract: Small molecules that target the ribosome generally have a global impact on protein synthesis. However, the drug-like molecule PF-06446846 (PF846) binds the human ribosome and selectively blocks the translation of a small subset of proteins by an unknown mechanism. In high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of human ribosome nascent chain complexes stalled by PF846, PF846 binds in the ribosome exit tunnel in a newly-identified and eukaryotic-specific pocket formed by the 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and redirects the path of the nascent polypeptide chain.
    [Show full text]