DOCSLIB.ORG

Onstitutional Eview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Volume 4, Number 2 ❏ December 2018 C ONSTITUTIONAL Constitutional Review Advisory Board Dr. Anwar Usman, S.H., M.H. Prof. Dr. Aswanto S.H., M.Si. DFM. R Prof. Dr.❏ Arief Megapolitical Hidayat, S.H.,Cases M.S. before the Constitutional Court of Indonesia since 2004: An Empirical Study EVIEW Prof. Dr. Enny Nurbaningsih, S.H., M.Hum. Dr. H. Wahiduddin Björn Dressel Adams, and S.H., Tomoo MA. Inoue Dr. I Dewa ❏Gede Indonesia’s Palguna, S.H.Judicial , M. Review Hum Regime in Comparative Dr. Suhartoyo,Perspective S. H. , M. H. Dr. Manahan M.Theunis P. Sitompul, Roux S.H., M. Hum Prof. Dr.❏ SaldiKorean Isra, Constitutional S.H., MPA. Court and Constitutionalism Prof. Dr. M. Gunturin Political Hamzah, Dynamics: S.H., M.H. Focusing on Presidential Kasianur ImpeachmentSidauruk, S.H., M.H. Dr. Wiryanto, Jin Wook S.H., Kim M.Hum. ❏ Volume 4, Number 2 Volume Referencing International Human Rights Law in Indonesian Constitutional Adjudication Bisariyadi ❏ Constitutional Retrogression in Indonesia Under President Joko Widodo’s Government: What Can the Constitutional Court Do? Abdurrachman Satrio ❏ ❏ Harmonization of Regulation Based on Pancasila December 2018 Values Through the Constitutional Court of Indonesia Tedi Sudrajat PUBLISHED BY CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND CASE ANALYSIS AND LIBRARY MANAGEMENT THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA TEH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTTHE REPUBLIC OF OF THE INDONESIA REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Constitutional Review, Volume 4, Number 2, December 2018 CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEWEditorial Team Volume 4, Number 2, December 2018Editor-in-Chief Pan Mohamad Faiz, Ph.D. Managing Editors CONTENTS Bisariyadi Megapolitical Cases before the Constitutional Court of Indonesia LuthfiSiti Rosmalina Widagdo Nurhayati Eddyono since 2004: An Empirical Study Oly Viana Agustine Editorial Board BjörnProf. Simon Dressel Butt, Ph.D. and Tomoo Inoue ........ 157-187 Sydney Law School, the University of Sydney Indonesia’s Judicial Review RegimeProf. Dr.in ByunComparative Hae-Cheol Perspective Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Theunis Roux ........ 188-221 Prof. Dr. H.R.B.M (Henk) Kummeling Utrecht University School of Law Korean Constitutional Court and Constitutionalism in Political Prof. Dr. I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani Dynamics: Focusing on PresidentialFaculty of Law, Impeachment Universitas Sebelas Maret Prof. Yuzuru Shimada, Ph.D.Jin Wook Kim ........ 222-248 DICOS, Nagoya University Referencing International HumanDhiana Puspitawati,Rights Ph.D.Law in Indonesian Constitutional AdjudicationFaculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya Muhammad Hayyan Ul Haq, Ph.D. Faculty of Law, Universitas Mataram Bisariyadi ........ 249-270 Mohamad Mova Al’afghani, Ph.D. Constitutional RetrogressionFaculty inof Law,Indonesia Universitas Under Ibnu Khaldun President Joko Widodo’s Government: What CanDr. Heribertusthe Constitutional Jaka Triyana Court Do? Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada Abdurrachman Satrio ........ 271-300 Dr. Matthias Hartwig Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Harmonization of Regulation Based on Pancasila Values Through Dr. Michael Vagias The Constitutional Court ofThe Indonesia Hague University, the Netherlands Publisher’s Address Tedi Sudrajat ........ 301-325 Center for Research and Case Analysis and Library Management Biography The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Name Index Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 Jakarta 10110 Subject Index Phone. (+6221) 23529000 Fax. (+6221) 352177 Author Guidelines E-mail: [email protected] This journalCitation can be is downloadedpermitted with on http://ejournal.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/ acknowledgement of the source The articles in this journal do not represent the opinion of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Advisory Board Dr. Anwar Usman, S.H., M.H. Prof. Dr. Aswanto S.H., M.Si. DFM. Prof. Dr. Arief Hidayat, S.H., M.S. Prof. Dr. Saldi Isra, S.H., MPA. Prof. Dr. Enny Nurbaningsih, S.H., M.Hum. Dr. H. Wahiduddin Adams, S.H., MA. Dr. I Dewa Gede Palguna, S.H. , M. Hum Dr. Suhartoyo, S. H. , M. H. Dr. Manahan M. P. Sitompul, S.H., M. Hum Prof. Dr. M. Guntur Hamzah, S.H., M.H. Kasianur Sidauruk, S.H., M.H. Dr. Wiryanto, S.H., M.Hum. TEH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW Volume 4, Number 2, December 2018 CONTENTS Megapolitical Cases before the Constitutional Court of Indonesia since 2004: An Empirical Study Björn Dressel and Tomoo Inoue ........ 157-187 Indonesia’s Judicial Review Regime in Comparative Perspective Theunis Roux ........ 188-221 Korean Constitutional Court and Constitutionalism in Political Dynamics: Focusing on Presidential Impeachment Jin Wook Kim ........ 222-248 Referencing International Human Rights Law in Indonesian Constitutional Adjudication Bisariyadi ........ 249-270 Constitutional Retrogression in Indonesia Under President Joko Widodo’s Government: What Can the Constitutional Court Do? Abdurrachman Satrio ........ 271-300 Harmonization of Regulation Based on Pancasila Values Through The Constitutional Court of Indonesia Tedi Sudrajat ........ 301-325 Biography Name Index Subject Index Author Guidelines Constitutional Review Note From Editors Constitutional Review (CONSREV) Journal Volume 4 Number 2 is the last edition of CONSREV in 2018 published by Center for Research and Case Analysis and Library Management of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The aim of this journal is to disseminate research, conceptual analysis, and other writings which focus on constitutional issues. Articles published by CONSREV cover various topics on constitution, constitutional courts, constitutional courts decisions and issues on constitutional law in any country. This edition provides six articles discussing various topics such as the empirical study of possible determinants of decisions of Indonesian Constitutional Court’s judges over the period 2003-2018, a comparative perspective on judicial review in Indonesia after the establishment of the Constitutional Court in 2003, the presidential impeachment happened in South Korea, the use of international human rights law as references in Indonesian constitutional adjudication, the constitutional retrogression in Indonesia during President Joko Widodo’s Government, and the role that should be presented by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia to harmonize the ideology of Pancasila in the Indonesia legal substance. The first article is written by Björn Dressel and Tomoo Inoue. The authors’ main discussion is about the megapolitical cases before the Constitutional Court Note From Editors of Indonesia since 2004. It is an empirical study which tried to find the possible determinants of the decisions of its judges over the period 2003-2018. Based on the analysis, authors found declining dissent among justices on the bench over time and also provides evidence of strategic behaviour of justices at the ending of their own terms. The next article written by Theunis Roux provides a comparative perspective on judicial review in Indonesia after the establishment of the Constitutional Court in 2003. A well-known story of the “transformation of American law” over the first half of the last century is provided as the introduction. At the end, the author proposed that the Court urgently needs to present a coherent account of its legitimate claim to authority if it is to continue playing an effective role. The third article is written by Jin Wook Kim. This paper aims to discuss how the Constitutional Court has developed its strategic position in terms of political dynamics, by analyzing the two presidential impeachment cases. Kim concludes that the recent two impeachment cases decided by the Constitutional Court of Korea, respectively in 2004 against President Roh and in 2017 against President Park might be classic examples of how the state institutions including the Court interact with other institutions in a very political case like presidential impeachment, in terms of political dynamics. Then, an article by Bisariyadi mainly talks about the use of international human rights law in Indonesian constitutional adjudication as reference. Additionally, this study also aims to answer the question of what underlies the Court to made reference to international human rights law. As the result of the study, the author mentioned that the practice of referring to international law demonstrates the open attitude of Indonesian constitutional justices to the universal nature of fundamental rights. The fifth article is provided by Abdurrachman Satrio. It mainly discusses the constitutional retrogression in Idonesia under President Joko Widodo’s Government. This paper examines whether constitutional retrogression, the process through which democratically elected rulers use formal legal measures gradually to undermine democracy, has occurred in Indonesia, especially during the reign of President Joko Widodo. iv Constitutional Review, December 2018, Volume 4, Number 2 Note From Editors Finally, an article written by Tedi Sudrajat focuses on the harmonization of regulation based on the value of Pancasila through the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. The finding of the study shows that the paradigm development of Pancasila based on legal state should demand the development of a democratic constitutional state, which juxtaposes the principles of a rule-of-law (nomocracy) with harmonious and complementary principles of the sovereignty
Recommended publications

  • 36/Puu-Xvi/2018

    PUTUSAN Nomor 36/PUU-XVI/2018 DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA [1.1] Yang mengadili perkara konstitusi pada tingkat pertama dan terakhir, menjatuhkan putusan dalam perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, yang diajukan oleh: 1. Nama : Muhammad Hafidz Pekerjaan : Pegawai Swasta Alamat : Jalan Tatya Wuni IV, Blok F5 Nomor 2, RT.007 RW.012, Kelurahan Cijujung, Kecamatan Sukaraja, Kabupaten Bogor Sebagai -------------------------------------------------------------------- Pemohon I; 2. Nama : Dewan Pimpinan Pusat Federasi Serikat Pekerja Singaperbangsa, diwakili oleh Agus Humaedi Abdillah selaku Ketua Umum Alamat : Ruko Buana Tamansari Nomor B003, Margasari, Kecamatan Karawang Timur, Kabupaten Karawang Sebagai ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pemohon II; 3. Nama : Perkumpulan Rakyat Proletar untuk Konstitusi, diwakili oleh Abda Khair Mufti selaku Ketua Alamat : Ruko Sentra Niaga Pinus Blok A5, Jalan Alternatif Sentul, Kandang Roda, Sukaraja, Kabupaten Bogor Sebagai ------------------------------------------------------------------ Pemohon III; Dalam hal ini berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus masing-masing bertanggal 15 Mei 2018 memberi kuasa kepada Dorel Almir, S.H., M.H., Julherfi, S.H., Abdulah, S.H., Kemala Dewi Mirza Andalusia, S.H., M.H., Iman Nul Islam, S.H., M.H., 2 Eep Ependi, S.H., Makrifat Putra Koto, S.H., dan Sayidatul Mardiyah, Advokat dan Para
  • Embedded Judicial Autonomy: How Ngos and Public Opinion Influence

    Embedded Judicial Autonomy: How Ngos and Public Opinion Influence

    Embedded Judicial Autonomy: How NGOs and Public Opinion Influence Indonesia's Constitutional Court by Dominic J. Nardi, Jr. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Allen D. Hicken, Chair Associate Professor John D. Ciorciari Professor Thomas B. Ginsburg, University of Chicago Professor Walter R. Mebane, Jr. Dominic J. Nardi, Jr. [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9414-2071 c Dominic J. Nardi, Jr. 2018 For the lawyers advocating on behalf of legal reform and social justice in Indonesia. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Despite the popular stereotype of the lonely scholar toiling away in the Ivory Tower, throughout my time at the University of Michigan I found that great scholarship requires the support of a community. I benefitted from the academic insights, financial assistance, and emotional support of numerous people around the world during the past seven years. First and foremost, I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee, who have guided and put up with me for almost half a decade. It has been a honor for me to work with such an extraordinary group of scholars. When I first arrived at the University of Michigan, several students told me that I was fortunate to focus on Southeast Asia because I would have the opportunity to work with Allen Hicken. Allen has been incredibly supportive over the years, both as a dissertation chairman and as a mentor. He helped me navigate the sometimes intimidating world of academia and made me feel I wasn't alone in this endeavor.
  • How the Constitutional Court Settled the 2014 Presidential Election Dispute?

    How the Constitutional Court Settled the 2014 Presidential Election Dispute?

    Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ), Volume IV, Issue III, March 2016 8 ISSN 2201-2796 The Future of Indonesian Democracy: How the Constitutional Court Settled the 2014 Presidential Election Dispute? Dr. Andi Muhammad Asrun Head of Graduates Legal Study of University of Pakuan, Bogor, Indonesia [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract- The 2014 general election resulted Joko Widodo, or popularly known as Jokowi, elected as the country’s seventh I. INTRODUCTION president and Muhammad Jusuf Kalla, or shortly called as JK, Following the amendment of the 1945 Constitution,1 as the vice president was claimed by Prabowo Subianto and Indonesian people chose directly President and Vice President.2 Hatta Rajasa “full of fraud, intimidation, and money politics.” In fact some experts worry that Indonesia's endemic corruption Direct presidential elections are the fruit of political reforms could affect that decision. This paper based on literatures and after the fall of former dictator President Suharto in May other qualitative secondary data and information aims at 1998.The amendments of the 1945 Constitution has paved the discussing how the Constitutional Court settled the 2014 way people can directly choose the president. Political reforms Presidential Election dispute. It found that the Constitutional that generate four times the 1945 constitution changes have Court made a decision by the nine judges unanimously rejected brought new nuances in the state system of Indonesia.3 Another the lawsuit camp Subianto-Hatta at a hearing on August 21, important outcome of political reform post-Suharto 2014. The Constitutional Court argues Subianto-Rajasa cannot government is barring the post of president and vice president prove its claim in the trial.
  • A Critical Analysis of Judicial Appointment Process and Tenure of Constitutional Justice in Indonesia

    A Critical Analysis of Judicial Appointment Process and Tenure of Constitutional Justice in Indonesia

    Hasanuddin Law Review Vol. 2 Issue 2, August (2016) Volume 2 Issue 2, August 2016: pp. 152-169. Copyright © 2015- 2016 HALREV. Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. ISSN: 2442-9880 | e-ISSN: 2442-9899. HALREV Open Access at: http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev Hasanuddin Law Review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A Critical Analysis of Judicial Appointment Process and Tenure of Constitutional Justice in Indonesia Pan Mohamad Faiz TC Beirne School of Law, the University of Queensland The University of Queensland, St. Lucia Campus, Australia Tel./Fax: +61-7-3365-2206 E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: May 26, 2016; Reviewed: Jul 14, 2016; Accepted: Jul 21, 2016 Abstract: The judicial appointment process is one of essential elements for maintaining judicial independence and public confidence of a court. This article analyses the practices of judicial appointment process exercised by three different main state institutions in selecting constitutional justice in Indonesia where the mechanism and process for selecting them have been implemented differently. It also examines the tenure of constitutional justice, which is a five-year term and can be renewed for one term only, that may lead to another problem concerning the reselection process of incumbent constitutional justices for their second term. The article concludes that the judicial appointment process and tenure of constitutional justice in Indonesia have to be improved. It suggests that if the proposing state institutions could not meet the principles of transparency, participation, objective and accountable required by the Constitutional Court Law, the judicial appointment process should be conducted by creating an independent Selection Committee or establishing a cooperation with the Judicial Commission.
  • PUBLISHED by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

    PUBLISHED by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

    December 2016 ❏ Volume 2, Number 2 C ONSTITUTIONAL Constitutional Review Thank you very much to ❏ TheAdvisers Strong State and Pancasila: Reflecting Human R Rights in the Indonesian Democracy Prof. Dr. Arief Hidayat, S.H., M.S. Zezen Zaenal Mutaqin EVIEW Dr. Anwar Usman, S.H., M.H. Prof. Dr. Maria❏ The Farida Constitutionalization Indrati, S.H., M.H. of Budget for Education and Dr. PatrialisIts Judicial Akbar, S.H.,Enforcement M.H. in Indonesia Dr. H. Wahiduddin Andy Omara Adams, S.H., MA. Prof. Dr.❏ AswantoElection S.H., Design M.Si. FollowingDFM. Constitutional Court Dr. I Dewa GedeDecision Palguna, Number S.H. ,14/PUU-XI/2013 M. Hum Dr. Suhartoyo,Fajar Laksono S. H. and, M. Oly H. Viana Agustine Dr. Manahan❏ M.Dynamics P. Sitompul, of S.H.,the M.Obligation Hum to Register Birth Certificates as a part of the Right to Issuance Population Documents December 2016 Winda Wijayanti ❏ The Unamendable Articles of the 1945 Constitution Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono ❏ Architecture of Indonesia’s Checks and Balances Ibnu Sina Chandranegara ❏ Volume 2, Number 2 Volume PUBLISHED BY The Constitutional Court of The Republic of Indonesia We Also Publish: “Jurnal Konstitusi” Accredited By LIPI (Indonesian Institute of Sciences) and DIKTI (Indonesian Directorate General of THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Higher Education) TEH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Constitutional Review, Desember 2016, Volume 2, Number 2 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
  • Onstitutional Eview

    Onstitutional Eview

    Volume 4, Number 1 ❏ May 2018 C ONSTITUTIONAL Constitutional Review Advisory Board Dr. Anwar Usman, S.H., M.H. Prof. Dr. Aswanto S.H., M.Si. DFM. R Prof. Dr.❏ Arief The Hidayat, Function S.H., of M.S.Judicial Dissent in Indonesia’s Prof. Dr. Maria ConstitutionalFarida Indrati, Court S.H., M.H. EVIEW Dr. H. Wahiduddin Simon ButtAdams, S.H., MA. Dr. I Dewa Gede Palguna, S.H. , M. Hum ❏ Filling the Hole in Indonesia’s Constitutional System: Dr. Suhartoyo,Constitutional S. H. , M.Courts H. and the Review of Regulations Dr. Manahan M.in P. aSitompul, Split Jurisdiction S.H., M. Hum Prof. Dr. SaldiTim Lindsey Isra, S.H., MPA. Prof. Dr. M.❏ Guntur Proportionality Hamzah, TestS.H., in M.H. the 1945 Constitution: Limiting Kasianur Sidauruk,Hizbut Tahrir S.H., Freedom M.H. of Assembly Dr. Wiryanto, Giri Ahmad S.H., TaufikM.Hum. ❏ Volume 4, Number 1 Volume Mainstreaming Human Rights in the Asian Judiciary Desi Hanara ❏ Revisiting Liberal Democracy and Asian Values in Contemporary Indonesia Muhammad Bahrul Ulum and Nilna Aliyan Hamida ❏ The Obligation of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia to Give Consideration in the Process of Dissolution ❏ of Societal Organizations May 2018 Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh PUBLISHED BY CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND CASE ANALYSIS AND LIBRARY MANAGEMENT THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA TEH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTTHE REPUBLIC OF OF THE INDONESIA REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Constitutional Review, Volume 4, Number 1, May 2018 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTEditorial OF Team THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Volume 4, Number 1, May 2018 Editor-in-Chief Pan Mohamad Faiz Managing Editors Bisariyadi CONTENTS The Function of Judicial Dissent LuthfiSitiin RosmalinaIndonesia’s Widagdo Nurhayati Eddyono Constitutional Court Oly Viana Agustine Editorial Board Simon Butt .......