Pedogenesis and Soil-Geomorphic Relationships in an Arid Mountain Range, Mojave Desert, California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pedogenesis and Soil-Geomorphic Relationships in an Arid Mountain Range, Mojave Desert, California Pedology Pedogenesis and Soil-Geomorphic Relationships in an Arid Mountain Range, Mojave Desert, California Mountains are impressive features of many desert landscapes because of their elevation, complex topography, and Daniel R. Hirmas* sheer extent. Soil genesis and landscape processes were studied in the southern Fry Mountains, Mojave Desert, Dep. of Geography California. Our aim was to better understand the processes responsible for the distribution of soil properties in Univ. of Kansas this landscape. Measured properties in 65 soil pits across the study site show that dust, soluble salt, NO −–N, and Lawrence, KS 66045-7613 3 carbonate distributions are correlated with the prevailing wind direction. Th is fi nding suggests that the mountain range eff ectively traps eolian sediment. Soils mantling these mountains have accumulated, on average, 41 kg m−2 Robert C. Graham −2 −2 − −2 Soil and Water Sciences Program silicate dust, 172 g m soluble salts, 3.3 g m NO3 –N, and 79 kg m carbonate and reached maximum −2 −2 −2 −2 Dep. of Environmental Sciences concentrations of 156 kg m , 1800 g m , 43 g m , and 398 kg m , respectively, on windward sides of the range. Univ. of California Th e basin fl oor encompassing Soggy Lake, an upwind playa, is the probable primary source of these materials. Riverside, CA 92521-0424 Soil morphology and land surface characteristics from four major mountain landforms were used to interpret the pedogenic and soil-geomorphic processes that have led to the distribution patterns of these accumulations. Our − study demonstrates that arid mountains accumulate and store appreciable quantities of dust, soluble salts, NO3 , and carbonate and are therefore important to the overall geomorphic evolution and biogeochemical cycling of the region. Th e previously unaccounted storage of pedogenic carbonate in similar mountain ranges could increase the global soil inorganic C pool estimate by as much as 15 to 174 Pg C. Abbreviations: CCE, calcium carbonate equivalent; EC, electrical conductivity; SAR, sodium adsorption ratio; TDS, total dissolved solids. ountains are distinct and conspicuous parts of the desert landscape. Th ey Mcomprise approximately 38% of desert lands of the southwestern United States (Clements et al., 1957) and are characterized by extreme topography, com- plex slopes with steep gradients, and distinct geomorphic junctions at the moun- tain–piedmont boundary (Cooke et al., 1993). Because of their extent and setting, mountains probably control or strongly infl uence surfi cial processes in the desert landscape, yet few studies have directly explored pedogenic and soil-geomorphic processes of these landforms. Previous work has shown that, for desert soils generally, eolian dust accumulation and the amount and pattern of water infi ltration are key determinants of pedogenesis (Brown and Dunkerley, 1996; Shafer et al., 2007). In turn, dust trapping and infi ltration are controlled by land surface characteristics and near- surface soil horizons. For example, desert pavements and vesicular horizons are the products of those surface characteristics that are able to trap and store considerable quantities of dust (Wells et al., 1985). Th us, the process of dust fl ux across and into the surface is immensely important to the landscape hydrology and geomorphology in these arid systems. Although dust is a major contributor to soils of desert piedmonts (Simonson, 1995), several studies have shown that dust also accumulates in arid mountains. Soils under steep bouldery talus slopes of the Buckskin Range, Nevada, are deep and well developed (Blank et al., 1996). Th ese soils have resulted from a combination Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75:192–206 Posted online 17 Nov. 2010 doi:10.2136/sssaj2010.0152 Received 29 Mar. 2010. *Corresponding author ([email protected]). © Soil Science Society of America, 5585 Guilford Rd., Madison WI 53711 USA All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. 192 SSSAJ: Volume 75: Number 1 • January–February 2011 of eolian deposition, subsequent mineral transformation to of Los Angeles. Th e study area is a bolson (i.e., an internally drained smectites, and the upward raft ing of talus. Dust-fi lled pockets intermontane basin; Peterson, 1981) and includes Soggy Lake playa and crevices in the bedrock of mountain peaks and isolated ridges (Fig. 1). Bedrock exposures in the Fry Mountains include Mesozoic occur across the Mojave Desert (Reynolds et al., 2006). Th e diorites, monzonites, and interspersed high-grade metamorphic rocks propensity for dust accumulation in the soils of arid mountains (Nash, 1988). Soil ages on the bajada, estimated from luminescence has been linked to the distinctive land surface characteristics of dates at nearby trenches, range from 4400 to 28,000 yr (Rockwell et the uplands (Hirmas, 2008), yet few studies have investigated al., 2000). Annual rainfall commonly varies between 76 and 127 mm this connection. and occurs predominantly during the winter months (Howell et al., In this study, we examined the relationships between soil 2007), which yields an aridic soil moisture regime that borders on genesis and geomorphologically controlled dust fl ux in an arid xeric. Creosote-bush [Larrea tridentata (DC.) Coville] and burro-weed mountain range by integrating multiple techniques. Th e ultimate [Ambrosia dumosa (A. Gray) W.W. Payne] dominate the vegetation, goal of this work was to understand and isolate the relevant with brittlebush (Encelia farinosa A. Gray ex Torr.) locally prominent in soil-geomorphic processes responsible for the distribution of soil the mountains and saltbush (Atriplex spp.) common at the playa margin morphological, textural, and chemical properties in this landscape. (Hirmas et al., 2010). Elevations within the ?430-ha study area range from 875 m in the playa to 1200 m at the mountaintop (Fig. 1). MATERIALS AND METHODS Soggy Lake playa is intermittently fl ooded by runoff from the Study Area surrounding piedmont and uplands during fl ash fl oods (French, Th is study was conducted in the southern Fry Mountains, 1977). Studies on paleolake levels and alluvial fans in the Mojave Mojave Desert, California (Fig. 1), approximately 150 km northeast Desert suggest that the region experienced several periods of increased moisture since the last glacial maximum (e.g., Enzel et al., 1989, 2003; Ely et al., 1993; Wells et al., 2003). Th ese wetter periods are known to be associated with intermittent lake stands of the nearby Mojave River basin. We are, however, unaware of any studies documenting the paleohydrology of Soggy Lake. Th e site included six watersheds of the southern Fry Mountains, the associated piedmont, and the basin fl oor. Th e mountains were subdivided using the taxonomic logic of Peterson (1981) and terms consistent with Wysocki et al. (2000) where applicable. Previous work at the site revealed four major landforms within the southern Fry Mountains: mountaintop, mountainfl at, mountainfl ank, and mountainbase (Hirmas, 2008). Briefl y, mountaintops are defi ned as crest or ridgeline positions on a mountain and are characterized by gentle ridge slopes oft en interrupted by crags or knolls, which may form small isolated peaks. Mountainfl ats are broad, open expanses of subdued, low-relief topography containing hills, colluvial aprons, and pediments that are located within the mountain range and are elevated above the surrounding piedmont by at least 50 to 100 m. Mountainfl anks are long Fig. 1. Location and soil classifi cation of sampling sites in the southern Fry Mountain bolson study complex sideslopes of a mountain. area. Location of the Lenwood fault is approximate; H = Haplo, L = Lithic, P = Petro, N = nodic, S = Mountainbase landforms occur at Sodic, X = Xeric, THS = Typic Haplosalid, CA = Calciargid, HA = Haplargid, TO = Torriorthent, TPSA = the base of mountain slopes and are Torripsamment, CAL = calcid, and CAM = cambid. Elevation contours are given in 5-m intervals. SSSAJ: Volume 75: Number 1 • January–February 2011 193 composed largely of thick wedges of colluvium. Bench landforms, which was collected from each location. Th e particle size distribution was occurred within the mountainfl anks, were grouped with mountaintops determined on suspensions of soil, dust trap, and natural trap samples on the basis of similar land surface characteristics, such as the frequency, using a Horiba LA 930 laser scattering particle-size and distribution size, and sorting of surface clasts. Th e locations of these landforms analyzer (Horiba Instruments, Irvine, CA), which yielded data in 73 within the study area are shown in Fig. 1. bins between 0.115 and 2000 μm (Hirmas et al., 2010). Saturated soil pastes were extracted with the procedure outlined Soil Sampling and Analyses in Soil Survey Laboratory Staff (1996). Soil weights and water volumes Th e number of sampling sites was approximately proportional to for each paste were recorded. Th ese values were combined with bulk the map area of each landform (Fig. 1) and sampling locations were density to convert concentration data from each horizon to a mass-per- randomly distributed within each landform. At each sampling site, the volume basis according to following land surface characteristics were measured: percentage of land CC f f surface covered by clasts, mean clast width, clast frequency, clast sorting, spRR sp 11 ad gr S b 1! 76 [1] percentage of land surface covered by overlapping clasts, and land C −3 C surface roughness. Mean values and procedures used to measure these where is concentration (g m ), sp is concentration of the saturation −1 variables are given by Hirmas (2008). Briefl y, a 1-m tape transect was paste extract (mg L ), θsp is the gravimetric water content of the placed on the ground in a random orientation.
Recommended publications
  • Morphological Characteristics and Classification of Soils Derived from Diverse Parent Materials in Central Cross River State, Nigeria
    GLOBAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED SCIENCES VOL. 14, NO. 3, 2008: 271 - 277 271 COPYRIGHT (C) BACHUDO SCIENCES CO. LTD. PRINTED IN NIGERIA. 1SSN 1118-0579 MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS DERIVED FROM DIVERSE PARENT MATERIALS IN CENTRAL CROSS RIVER STATE, NIGERIA M. E. NSOR and I. J. IBANGA (Received 5 October 2007; Revision Accepted 5 December 2007) ABSTRACT Variation in soil characteristics is usually a reflection of the difference in materials from which the soil was formed. This study sought to investigate the characteristics of soils formed on different parent materials with a view to classifying them. This study was carried out in selected soils derived from three major types of parent materials in central Cross River State, South Eastern Nigeria. A total of six (6) pedons were excavated, two (2) pedons in each of the identified parent materials. The parent materials were Sandstone-shale-siltstone intercalations. Basement complex and Basalt. The study indicated that soils derived from sandstone-shale-siltstone materials are characterized by ochric sandy loam and loamy sand epipedons with moderate medium sub-angular blocky structures. These soils are also light coloured with dominant hues of 7.5YR with hard to slightly hard and hard to very hard dry consistence at the surface and sub-soil respectively. Soils of basement complex are characterized by the possession of loamy sand epipedons with weak medium crumb and sub-angular blocky structures having predominantly dull yellowish brown and bright yellowish brown colours at the surface and sub-soils. The dry consistences of the surface soils are slightly hard while the sub-soils are hard to very hard.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Erosion Control Practices on Nutrient Loss
    Effects of Erosion Control Practices on Nutrient Loss George F. Czapar, University of Illinois John M. Laflen, Iowa State University Gregory F. McIsaac, University of Illinois Dennis P. McKenna, Illinois Department of Agriculture Elements of Soil Erosion Soil erosion by water is the detachment of soil particles by the direct action of raindrops and runoff water, and the transport of these particles by splash and very shallow flowing water to small channels or rills. Detachment of soil particles also occurs in these rills due to the force exerted by the flowing water. When rills join together and form larger channels, they may become gullies. These gullies can be either temporary (ephemeral) or permanent (classical). Non-erodible channels might be grassed waterways, or designed channels that limit flow conditions so that channel erosion does not occur. Gross erosion includes sheet, rill, gully and channel erosion, and is the first step in the process of sediment delivery. Because much eroded sediment is deposited in or near the field of origin, only a fraction of the total eroded soil from an area contributes to sediment yield from a watershed. Sediment delivery is affected by a number of factors including soil properties, proximity to the stream, man made structures-including sediment basins, fences, and culverts, channel density, basin characteristics, land use/land cover, and rainfall-runoff factors. Coarse- textured sediment and sediment from sheet and rill erosion are less likely to reach a stream than fine-grained sediment or sediment from channel erosion. In general, the larger the area, the lower the ratio of sediment yield at the watershed outlet or point of interest to gross erosion in the entire watershed, defined as the sediment delivery ratio (SDR).
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Soil Science W
    Basic Soil Science W. Lee Daniels See http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/430/430-350/430-350_pdf.pdf for more information on basic soils! [email protected]; 540-231-7175 http://www.cses.vt.edu/revegetation/ Well weathered A Horizon -- Topsoil (red, clayey) soil from the Piedmont of Virginia. This soil has formed from B Horizon - Subsoil long term weathering of granite into soil like materials. C Horizon (deeper) Native Forest Soil Leaf litter and roots (> 5 T/Ac/year are “bio- processed” to form humus, which is the dark black material seen in this topsoil layer. In the process, nutrients and energy are released to plant uptake and the higher food chain. These are the “natural soil cycles” that we attempt to manage today. Soil Profiles Soil profiles are two-dimensional slices or exposures of soils like we can view from a road cut or a soil pit. Soil profiles reveal soil horizons, which are fundamental genetic layers, weathered into underlying parent materials, in response to leaching and organic matter decomposition. Fig. 1.12 -- Soils develop horizons due to the combined process of (1) organic matter deposition and decomposition and (2) illuviation of clays, oxides and other mobile compounds downward with the wetting front. In moist environments (e.g. Virginia) free salts (Cl and SO4 ) are leached completely out of the profile, but they accumulate in desert soils. Master Horizons O A • O horizon E • A horizon • E horizon B • B horizon • C horizon C • R horizon R Master Horizons • O horizon o predominantly organic matter (litter and humus) • A horizon o organic carbon accumulation, some removal of clay • E horizon o zone of maximum removal (loss of OC, Fe, Mn, Al, clay…) • B horizon o forms below O, A, and E horizons o zone of maximum accumulation (clay, Fe, Al, CaC03, salts…) o most developed part of subsoil (structure, texture, color) o < 50% rock structure or thin bedding from water deposition Master Horizons • C horizon o little or no pedogenic alteration o unconsolidated parent material or soft bedrock o < 50% soil structure • R horizon o hard, continuous bedrock A vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sborník Příspěvků Z Konference Pedologické Dny, Velké Bílovice, 2003
    PEDOGENEZE A KVALITATIVNÍ ZMĚNY PŮD V PODMÍNKÁCH PŘÍRODNÍCH A ANTROPICKY OVLIVNĚNÝCH ÚZEMÍ Bořivoj ŠARAPATKA a Marek BEDNÁŘ (Eds.) Sborník referátů z 11. pedologických dnů KOUTY NAD DESNOU, 20.–21. 9. 2006 Editoři © Bořivoj Šarapatka, Marek Bednář, 2006 1. vydání Olomouc 2006 ISBN 80-244-1448-1 2 ÚVOD Vážené kolegyně a kolegové, letošní již 11. pedologické dny jsme zasadili do horské oblasti mikro - regionu Jeseníky. Území, ve kterém strávíme dva jistě pěkné a přínosné dny, je velmi cenné přírodovědně. Na rozloze 740 km2 se zde nachází chráněná krajinná oblast Jeseníky. Na různorodém geologickém podloží se vyvinula unikátní společenstva rostlin a živočichů, která byla začleně- na do reprezentativní sítě zvláště chráněných území. Snad nejvýznamněj- ším maloplošným chráněným územím je známá NPR Praděd s takovým přírodním fenoménem, jakým je ledovcový kar Velké kotliny, který náleží botanicky k druhově nejbohatším lokalitám ve střední Evropě. Zájmové území mikroregionu není významné pouze z přírodo- vědného hlediska. Je i intenzivně zemědělsky a lesnicky obhospodařová- no. Od středověkého osídlení postupně docházelo k trvalému odlesňo- vání a zemědělskému využití území, vyšší polohy regionu zůstávaly bez trvalých sídel. Dnes na zemědělské půdě v oblasti dominují trvalé travní porosty. Nebylo tomu ale tak vždy, o čemž svědčí nejen hospodaření po druhé světové válce, ale i starší údaje např. z 19. století. Tehdy v jesenické oblasti tvořila orná půda více než 70 % z celkové půdy zemědělské (na- příklad v Loučné to bylo v roce 1900 74,8 %). O využití krajiny jak z pohledu zemědělského, tak lesnického bude pojednávat řada konferenčních příspěvků. Většinou budou prezentovat široký záběr týkající se nových poznatků o pedogenezi a kvalitativních změnách půd, a to jak v podmínkách přírodních, tak antropicky ovliv- něných území.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Physics and Agricultural Production
    Conference reports Soil physics and agricultural production by K. Reichardt* Agricultural production depends very much on the behaviour of field soils in relation to crop production, physical properties of the soil, and mainly on those and to develop effective management practices that related to the soil's water holding and transmission improve and conserve the quality and quantity of capacities. These properties affect the availability of agricultural lands. Emphasis is being given to field- water to crops and may, therefore, be responsible for measured soil-water properties that characterize the crop yields. The knowledge of the physical properties water economy of a field, as well as to those that bear of soil is essential in defining and/or improving soil on the quality of the soil solution within the profile water management practices to achieve optimal and that water which leaches below the reach of plant productivity for each soil/climatic condition. In many roots and eventually into ground and surface waters. The parts of the world, crop production is also severely fundamental principles and processes that govern limited by the high salt content of soils and water. the reactions of water and its solutes within soil profiles •Such soils, classified either as saline or sodic/saline are generally well understood. On the other hand, depending on their alkalinity, are capable of supporting the technology to monitor the behaviour of field soils very little vegetative growth. remains poorly defined primarily because of the heterogeneous nature of the landscape. Note was According to statistics released by the Food and taken of the concept of representative elementary soil Agriculture Organization (FAO), the world population volume in defining soil properties, in making soil physical is expected to double by the year 2000 at its current measurements, and in using physical theory in soil-water rate of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management
    October 2010 Agdex 510-1 Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management oil compaction can be a serious and unnecessary soil aggregates, which has a negative affect on soil S form of soil degradation that can result in increased aggregate structure. soil erosion and decreased crop production. Soil compaction can have a number of negative effects on Compaction of soil is the compression of soil particles into soil quality and crop production including the following: a smaller volume, which reduces the size of pore space available for air and water. Most soils are composed of • causes soil pore spaces to become smaller about 50 per cent solids (sand, silt, clay and organic • reduces water infiltration rate into soil matter) and about 50 per cent pore spaces. • decreases the rate that water will penetrate into the soil root zone and subsoil • increases the potential for surface Compaction concerns water ponding, water runoff, surface soil waterlogging and soil erosion Soil compaction can impair water Soil compaction infiltration into soil, crop emergence, • reduces the ability of a soil to hold root penetration and crop nutrient and can be a serious water and air, which are necessary for water uptake, all of which result in form of soil plant root growth and function depressed crop yield. • reduces crop emergence as a result of soil crusting Human-induced compaction of degradation. • impedes root growth and limits the agricultural soil can be the result of using volume of soil explored by roots tillage equipment during soil cultivation or result from the heavy weight of field equipment. • limits soil exploration by roots and Compacted soils can also be the result of natural soil- decreases the ability of crops to take up nutrients and forming processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive and Regressive Soil Evolution Phases in the Anthropocene
    Progressive and regressive soil evolution phases in the Anthropocene Manon Bajard, Jérôme Poulenard, Pierre Sabatier, Anne-Lise Develle, Charline Giguet- Covex, Jeremy Jacob, Christian Crouzet, Fernand David, Cécile Pignol, Fabien Arnaud Highlights • Lake sediment archives are used to reconstruct past soil evolution. • Erosion is quantified and the sediment geochemistry is compared to current soils. • We observed phases of greater erosion rates than soil formation rates. • These negative soil balance phases are defined as regressive pedogenesis phases. • During the Middle Ages, the erosion of increasingly deep horizons rejuvenated pedogenesis. Abstract Soils have a substantial role in the environment because they provide several ecosystem services such as food supply or carbon storage. Agricultural practices can modify soil properties and soil evolution processes, hence threatening these services. These modifications are poorly studied, and the resilience/adaptation times of soils to disruptions are unknown. Here, we study the evolution of pedogenetic processes and soil evolution phases (progressive or regressive) in response to human-induced erosion from a 4000-year lake sediment sequence (Lake La Thuile, French Alps). Erosion in this small lake catchment in the montane area is quantified from the terrigenous sediments that were trapped in the lake and compared to the soil formation rate. To access this quantification, soil processes evolution are deciphered from soil and sediment geochemistry comparison. Over the last 4000 years, first impacts on soils are recorded at approximately 1600 yr cal. BP, with the erosion of surface horizons exceeding 10 t·km− 2·yr− 1. Increasingly deep horizons were eroded with erosion accentuation during the Higher Middle Ages (1400–850 yr cal.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Soil Erosion? Soil Erosion by Wind Or Water Is the Physical Wearing Away of the Soil Surface
    Do you have a problem with: • Low yields • Time & expense to repair and gullies • Small rills and channels in your fields • Soil deposited at the base of slopes or along fence lines • Sediment in streams, lakes, and reservoirs Soil Erosion May be the Problem! Erosion from cropland What is soil erosion? Soil erosion by wind or water is the physical wearing away of the soil surface. Soil material and nutrients are removed in the process. Why be concerned? • Erosion reduces crop yields • Erosion removes topsoil, reduces soil organic matter, and destroys soil structure Signs of Erosion – Sediment entering river • Erosion decreases rooting depth • Erosion decreases the amount of water, air, and nutrients available to plants • Nutrients and sediment removed by water erosion cause water quality problems and fish kills • Blowing dust from wind erosion can affect human health and create public safety hazards • Increased production costs Erosion removes our richest soil. How much does it cost? • Technical assistance to assess and plan erosion control systems from NRCS is free • No till and mulch till may require special tillage equipment or planters if this equipment is not al- ready available • Vegetative barriers may cost $50-$100 per mile of barrier • Cover crops may cost between $10 and $40 per acre depending on the type of seed used Controlling Soil Erosion Signs of Erosion – Small rills and channels on the soil Dust clouds & “dirt devils” such as the one pictured surface are a sign of water erosion here are signs of wind erosion. How to Reduce Erosion: The key to reducing is erosion is to keep the soil covered as much as possible for both wind and water ero- sion concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Newly-Amended Biochar Particles Affect Erodibility and Soil Water Movement?—A Small-Scale Experimental Approach
    Article How Do Newly-Amended Biochar Particles Affect Erodibility and Soil Water Movement?—A Small-Scale Experimental Approach Steffen Seitz * , Sandra Teuber , Christian Geißler, Philipp Goebes and Thomas Scholten Department of Geosciences, Soil Science and Geomorphology, University of Tübingen, Rümelinstrasse 19–23, 72070 Tübingen, Germany; [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (C.G.); [email protected] (P.G.); [email protected] (T.S.) * Correspondence: steff[email protected]; Tel.: +49-7071-29-77523 Received: 16 July 2020; Accepted: 23 September 2020; Published: 6 October 2020 Abstract: Biochar amendment changes chemical and physical properties of soils and influences soil biota. It is, thus, assumed that it can also affect soil erosion and erosion-related processes. In this study, we investigated how biochar particles instantly change erodibility by rain splash and the initial movement of soil water in a small-scale experiment. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)-char and Pyrochar were admixed to two soil substrates. Soil erodibility was determined with Tübingen splash cups under simulated rainfall, soil hydraulic conductivity was calculated from texture and bulk soil density, and soil water retention was measured using the negative and the excess pressure methods. Results showed that the addition of biochar significantly reduced initial soil erosion in coarse sand and silt loam immediately after biochar application. Furthermore, biochar particles were not preferentially removed from the substrate surface, but increasing biochar particle sizes partly showed decreasing erodibility of substrates. Moreover, biochar amendment led to improved hydraulic conductivity and soil water retention, regarding soil erosion control. In conclusion, this study provided evidence that biochar amendments reduce soil degradation by water erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Soils/Land Use Study Resources
    2021 NCF Envirothon Soil Test Study Guide Lincoln, Nebraska 2021 NCF-Envirothon Nebraska Soils and Land Use Study Resources Key Topic #1: Physical Properties of Soil and Soil Formation 1. Describe the five soil forming factors, and how they influence soil properties. 2. Explain the defining characteristics of a soil describing how the basic soil forming processes influence affect these characteristics in different types of soil. 3. Identify different types of parent material, their origins, and how they impact the soil that develops from them. 4. Identify and describe soil characteristics (horizon, texture, structure, color). 5. Identify and understand physical features of soil profiles and be able to use this information interpret soil properties and limitations. Study Resources Sample Soil Description Scorecard – University of Nebraska – Lincoln Land Judging Documents, edited by Judy Turk, 2021 (Pages 3-4) Soil Description Field Manual Reference – University of Nebraska – Lincoln Land Judging Documents, edited by Judy Turk, 2021 (Pages 5-17) Correlation of Field Texturing Soils by Feel, Understanding Soil Laboratory Data, and Use of the Soil Textural Triangle – Patrick Cowsert, 2021 (Pages 18-21) Tips for Measuring Percent Slope on Contour Maps – Excerpt from Forest Measurements by Joan DeYoung, 2018 (Pages 22-23) Glossary – Excerpts from Geomorphic Description System version 5.0, 2017, and Field Book for Describing Soils version 3.0, 2012 (Pages 24-27) Study Resources begin on the next page! Contestant Number Sample Soil Description Card Site/Pit Number Host: University of Nebraska – Lincoln Number of Horizons Lower Profile Depth 2021 –Scorecard Nail Depth A. Soil Morphology Part A Score __________ Moist Horizons Boundary Texture Color Redox.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining the Pedosphere: Establishing a Framework for Management, Utilzation and Restoration of Soils in Cultured Systems
    Sustaining the Pedosphere: Establishing A Framework for Management, Utilzation and Restoration of Soils in Cultured Systems Eugene F. Kelly Colorado State University Outline •Introduction - Its our Problems – Life in the Fastlane - Ecological Nexus of Food-Water-Energy - Defining the Pedosphere •Framework for Management, Utilization & Restoration - Pedology and Critical Zone Science - Pedology Research Establishing the Range & Variability in Soils - Models for assessing human dimensions in ecosystems •Studies of Regional Importance Systems Approach - System Models for Agricultural Research - Soil Water - The Master Variable - Water Quality, Soil Management and Conservation Strategies •Concluding Remarks and Questions Living in a Sustainable Age or Life in the Fast Lane What do we know ? • There are key drivers across the planet that are forcing us to think and live differently. • The drivers are influencing our supplies of food, energy and water. • Science has helped us identify these drivers and our challenge is to come up with solutions Change has been most rapid over the last 50 years ! • In last 50 years we doubled population • World economy saw 7x increase • Food consumption increased 3x • Water consumption increased 3x • Fuel utilization increased 4x • More change over this period then all human history combined – we are at the inflection point in human history. • Planetary scale resources going away What are the major changes that we might be able to adjust ? • Land Use Change - the world is smaller • Food footprint is larger (40% of land used for Agriculture) • Water Use – 70% for food • Running out of atmosphere – used as as disposal for fossil fuels and other contaminants The Perfect Storm Increased Demand 50% by 2030 Energy Climate Change Demand up Demand up 50% by 2030 30% by 2030 Food Water 2D View of Pedosphere Hierarchal scales involving soil solid-phase components that combine to form horizons, profiles, local and regional landscapes, and the global pedosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Climatic Change on Soil Hydraulic Properties During
    water Article Effects of Climatic Change on Soil Hydraulic Properties during the Last Interglacial Period: Two Case Studies of the Southern Chinese Loess Plateau Tieniu Wu 1,2 , Henry Lin 2, Hailin Zhang 1,*, Fei Ye 1, Yongwu Wang 1, Muxing Liu 1, Jun Yi 1 and Pei Tian 1 1 Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation, Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China; [email protected] (T.W.); [email protected] (F.Y.); [email protected] (Y.W.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (J.Y.); [email protected] (P.T.) 2 Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-27-6786-7503 Received: 16 January 2020; Accepted: 10 February 2020; Published: 12 February 2020 Abstract: The hydraulic properties of paleosols on the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP) are closely related to agricultural production and are indicative of the environmental evolution during geological and pedogenic periods. In this study, two typical intact sequences of the first paleosol layer (S1) on the southern CLP were selected, and soil hydraulic parameters together with basic physical and chemical properties were investigated to reveal the response of soil hydraulic properties to the warm and wet climate conditions. The results show that: (1) the paleoclimate in the southern CLP during the last interglacial period showed a pattern of three warm and
    [Show full text]