DOCSLIB.ORG

No. 20-637 Petitioner, V. Respondent. on Writ of Certiorari to the Court Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
No. 20-637 Petitioner, V. Respondent. on Writ of Certiorari to the Court Of No. 20-637 IN THE DARRELL HEMPHILL, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York JOINT APPENDIX Noah J. Chamoy Jeffrey L. Fisher Assistant District Attorney STANFORD LAW SCHOOL OFFICE OF THE BRONX SUPREME COURT COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY LITIGATION CLINIC 198 East 161st Street 559 Nathan Abbott Way Bronx, New York 10451 Stanford, CA 94305 Telephone: (718) 838-7142 (650) 724-7081 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel of Record for Counsel of Record for Respondent Petitioner Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed: November 6, 2020 Certiorari Granted: April 19, 2021 i TABLE OF CONTENTS RELEVANT DOCKET ENTRIES Supreme Court of New York, County of Bronx, Ind. No. 1221/2013 .............................. 1 Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, Ind. No. 1221/2013 ........................................................ 2 State of New York Court of Appeals, APL- 2019-00202 ..................................................... 3 MATERIALS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK: CRIMINAL TERM, PART T-11, IN PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK V. NICHOLAS MORRIS, IND. NO. 1674-2006 Transcript of State’s Opening Statement on April 10, 2008 ................................................. 4 Transcript of Allocution Proceedings held on May 29, 2008 ................................................. 18 MATERIALS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK: CRIMINAL TERM, PART 60 IN PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK V. DARRYL HEMPHILL, IND. NO. 1221/2013 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on September 21, 2015 ................................. 41 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on October 2, 2015 ........................................ 52 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on October 7, 2015 ........................................ 58 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on October 16, 2015 ...................................... 62 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on October 26, 2015 ...................................... 64 ii Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on November 5, 2015 .................................. 100 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on November 12, 2015 ................................ 110 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on November 13, 2015 ................................ 125 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on November 16, 2015 ................................ 137 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on November 18, 2015 ................................ 163 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on November 19, 2015 ................................ 182 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on November 20, 2015 ................................ 189 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on December 2, 2015 ................................... 210 Transcript of Jury Trial Proceedings held on December 3, 2015 ................................... 299 Court’s Exhibit III admitted on November 20, 2015 ....................................................... 363 Court’s Exhibits VII – XIII (Jury Notes 1 through 7) admitted between December 3 – 7, 2015 .................................. 364 MATERIALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF NEW YORK IN PEOPLE V. DARRYL HEMPHILL, APL-2019- 00202 Appellant Darryl Hemphill’s Rule 500.11 Letter Brief submitted December 12, 2019 ............................................................. 371 Appellant Darryl Hemphill’s Rule 500.11 Reply Brief submitted March 6, 2020 ........ 400 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX: CRIMINAL TERM People of the State of New York v. Darrell Hemphill Indictment No. 1221/2013 RELEVANT DOCKET ENTRIES Date Filed Docket Description 04/23/2013 Information / Indictment filed 09/21/2015 Trial commences 12/07/2015 Jury verdict 01/06/2016 Judgment 01/08/2016 Notice of appeal to Appellate Division 2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT People of the State of New York v. Darrell Hemphill Indictment No. 1221/2013 RELEVANT DOCKET ENTRIES Date Filed Docket Text 01/08/2016 Notice of appeal filed 03/16/2019 Oral argument 06/11/2019 Judgment filed 06/17/2019 Application for review in the Court of Appeals 3 IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS People of the State of New York v. Darrell Hemphill APL-2019-00202 RELEVANT DOCKET ENTRIES Date Filed Docket Text 06/17/2019 Application for review filed 06/25/2020 Opinion issued 4 [148] SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX: CRIMINAL TERM: PART T-11 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, x : - against - : NICHOLAS MORRIS, : Defendant(s). : x April 10, 2008 BEFORE: HONORABLE MICHAEL GROSS, Justice (Same appearances as previously noted.) * * * * [207:20] THE COURT: So noted. Were the parties ready for the jury to be returned for the People's opening statement? COURT OFFICER: All rise, jury entering. (Whereupon, the sworn jurors enter the courtroom and take their respective seats.) THE COURT: All parties may be seated. The record [208] will reflect all jurors are present and properly seated. Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen of the jury. It’s nice to see you after this two day break. At this time, as I indicated to you earlier in the week, we will be hearing the prosecutor’s opening statement. 5 Mr. Karen, you may deliver your opening. MR. KAREN: Thank you, Judge. Good afternoon. As the judge told you, it is the People’s obligation to tell you in openings what we intend to prove and this is it. On Easter Sunday, April 16, 2006, a bright, sunny Easter Sunday at about 1:45 in the afternoon on Tremont Avenue, a busy street with lots of people on the street and lots of cars going by, Joanne Cinabria, the mother of two-year-old David Pacheco Jr. was driving a Honda Odyssey van with her two-year-old baby strapped in the back seat and other family members. She was going to pick up her husband, David Pacheco Senior and they were going to church and to dinner. She was driving on East Tremont Avenue near Harrison Avenue in the Bronx when that man, Nicholas Morris, opened fire on a totally different group of people. A group of five young Hispanic men and women. A bullet that Morris intended for that group of people, and there were several shots fired, went through the side sliding door of Ms. Cinabria’s Honda and it virtually, instantly killed two-year-old David Pacheco, Jr. [209] You’ll hear about the attempts to save him and to resuscitate him. But for all intents and purpose, he was dead when he was shot, as the medical examiner, Dr. Gill, will tell you when he testifies early next week. Now, there were a group of five eyewitnesses who were being shot at and all of them will testify here, the intended target of the Defendant Morris, were Marisol Santiago, twenty years old, her boyfriend Juan Carlos 6 Garcia, 24 years old, her mother Brenda Gonzalez, 41 years old, Brenda’s boyfriend Jose Castro, 27 years old, and their cousin John Eric Vargas, 24 years old. You’re going to learn that four of these eyewitnesses separately and independently viewed a lineup on April 18, 2006, the day of the arrest. Three of the eyewitnesses, Brenda Gonzalez, Marisol Santiago, John Eric Vargas, independently and separately identified that man, Nicholas Morris. The fourth witness, Juan Carlos Garcia did not identify anybody, did not identify anybody. And you will learn that several nine millimeter shell casings were recovered by the crime scene unit, and various pieces of ballistics, damaged bullets, bullets recovered from various areas and the bullet that actually killed the baby. And you’re going to learn that there was a ballistics comparison made. And although no gun was recovered, the ballistics expert, Detective Fontanez can tell you all of [210] the ballistics could be matched, the casings and the bullets, with sufficient characteristics all came from the same gun, one gun. Interestingly, what was used here was a nine millimeter gun. And you will learn that there was a search done of the defendant’s bedroom and we recovered in that search, live nine millimeter ammunition in his bedroom. But aside from a live nine millimeter round, and some [.]357 ammunition, that’s a different type of gun. You will learn that under his mattress we recovered an assault rifle and an eight millimeter prop or movie gun. So, you’re going to have a lot of eyewitness testimony and the ballistics evidence. And if you would like to hear the defendant’s side of the story, because 7 we’re going to be introducing different statements that the defendant made. Now, some people might say if the statements are made — MR. BARKET: Objection, Judge. I have an objection and an application. THE COURT: Both Counsel may approach. (Whereupon, an off the record discussion was held.) THE COURT: The objection is overruled at this time[.] [211] MR. BARKET: I’m sorry, Judge. I didn’t state the basis of the objection on the record. THE COURT: There will be a full record, I’m just not going to shuttle the jury in and out, but there be will be a full record as to the basis of the objection. MR. KAREN: We’re going to introduce three different statements made by Nicholas Morris. Only one of them was made to the police, and I’m going to be going through all of them in the opening. One was made to Channel 12 News. It was broadcast, I’m going to show it to you. No police there. One was made to another inmate. You’re going to hear from that inmate. One was a written statement made to the police. Now, you’re going to hear from Anthony Gonzalez and he’s going to tell you that he had a conversation with Nicholas Morris around July 4th of 2006 and that man, Nicholas Morris, told Anthony Gonzalez, who knows nobody in this case, no family members, no eyewitnesses, no defendants, no anybody and who will 8 tell you he had read nothing about the case. Morris admitted that he did the shooting. It was a revenge shooting, and Gonzalez will tell you this is what I was told by the defendant.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A National Survey of Eyewitness Identification Procedures in Law
    A National Survey of Eyewitness Identification Procedures in Law Enforcement Agencies* Submitted to the National Institute of Justice March 8, 2013 * This project was supported by Grant No. 2010-IJ-CX0032 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document do not necessarily represent the views of individual PERF members or the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Police Executive Research Forum: 1120 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 930, Washington, DC 20036 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………. iii Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Chapter 2: Review of Relevant Literature………………………………………………….. 14 Chapter 3: Research Methods……………………………………………………………………. 29 The National Eyewitness Identification Survey…………………………............. 30 Telephone Interviews…………………………………………………………….………… 42 Chapter 4: Results……………………………………………………………………………............. 44 The National Eyewitness Identification Survey…………………………............. 44 Telephone Interviews…………………………………………………………….………… 70 Chapter 5: Discussion………………………..……………………..……...……………………......... 77 Summary of Findings…………………………................................................................. 78 Conclusion………………………………………………………….……………………………. 90 References…………………………………………………………………………………………..……… 97 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………………………… 102 i LIST OF TABLES IN MAIN TEXT Table 1: States by Four Census Regions ………………………………………………...……… 34 Table 2:
    [Show full text]
  • David Alejandro Neira Calderón
    “INCIDENCIA DEL PERIODISMO DIGITAL EN LA FORMACIÓN DE LOS FUTUROS PROFESIONALES EN COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL DE LA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LOJA, PERIODO SEPTIEMBRE 2010 – FEBRERO DE 2011”. TESIS PREVIA A LA OBTENCIÓN DEL GRADO DE LICENCIADO EN CIENCIAS DE LA COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL Postulante: David Alejandro Neira Calderón Director de Tesis Lic. Sybel EnriqueOntaneda Andrade Loja – Ecuador 2013 Lic. Sybel Enrique Ontaneda Andrade, Docente de la Carrera de Comunicación Social del Área de la Educación, el Arte y la Comunicación de la Universidad Nacional de Loja y Director de Tesis CERTIFICA Haber asesorado y revisado detenida y minuciosamente, durante todo su desarrollo, la tesis titulada: INCIDENCIA DEL PERIODISMO DIGITAL EN LA FORMACIÓN DE LOS FUTUROS PROFESIONALES EN COMUNICACIÓN SOCIAL DE LA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LOJA, PERIODO SEPTIEMBRE 2010 – FEBRERO DE 2011. Trabajo realizado por el postulante David Alejandro Neira Calderón, por lo tanto, autorizo proseguir los trámites legales pertinentes para su presentación y defensa. Loja, febrero de 2013. Lic. Sybel Enrique Ontaneda Andrade. DIRECTOR DE TESIS ii AUTORÍA Los criterios, análisis y opiniones vertidos en el siguiente trabajo de tesis, son de exclusiva responsabilidad del autor. ------------------------------------------------ David Alejandro Neira Calderón iii AGRADECIMIENTO Al finalizar este trabajo investigativo quiero dejar expreso agradecimiento a mis padres Víctor Neira Hinostroza, mi madre Cecilia Calderón Ruilova, quienes han sido mi apoyo en todo momento, los impulsadores para que este logro se concrete de manera positiva, a mis hermanas Claudia y Daniela que me han acompañado en todo momento. Expresar también el agradecimiento a los docentes, administrativos, estudiantes de la Carrera en Ciencias de la Comunicación Social.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Media Law & Ethics
    UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW JOURNAL OF MEDIA LAW & ETHICS Editor ERIC B. EASTON, PROFESSOR EMERITUS University of Baltimore School of Law EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS BENJAMIN BENNETT-CARPENTER, Special Lecturer, Oakland Univ. (Michigan) STUART BROTMAN, Distinguished Professor of Media Management & Law, Univ. of Tennessee L. SUSAN CARTER, Professor Emeritus, Michigan State University ANTHONY FARGO, Associate Professor, Indiana University AMY GAJDA, Professor of Law, Tulane University STEVEN MICHAEL HALLOCK, Professor of Journalism, Point Park University MARTIN E. HALSTUK, Professor Emeritus, Pennsylvania State University CHRISTOPHER HANSON, Associate Professor, University of Maryland ELLIOT KING, Professor, Loyola University Maryland JANE KIRTLEY, Silha Professor of Media Ethics & Law, University of Minnesota NORMAN P. LEWIS, Associate Professor, University of Florida KAREN M. MARKIN, Dir. of Research Development, University of Rhode Island KIRSTEN MOGENSEN, Associate Professor, Roskilde University (Denmark) KATHLEEN K. OLSON, Professor, Lehigh University RICHARD J. PELTZ-STEELE, Chancellor Professor, Univ. of Mass. School of Law JAMES LYNN STEWART, Professor, Nicholls State University CHRISTOPHER R. TERRY, Assistant Professor, University of Minnesota DOREEN WEISENHAUS, Associate Professor, Northwestern University UB Journal of Media Law & Ethics, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Fall/Winter 2020) 1 Submissions The University of Baltimore Journal of Media Law & Ethics (ISSN1940-9389) is an on-line, peer- reviewed journal published quarterly by the University of Baltimore School of Law. JMLE seeks theoretical and analytical manuscripts that advance the understanding of media law and ethics in society. Submissions may have a legal, historical, or social science orientation, but must focus on media law or ethics. All theoretical perspectives are welcome. All manuscripts undergo blind peer review.
    [Show full text]
  • Pasco Sheriff's Office Social Media Plan
    Pasco Sheriff’s Office Social Media Plan Overview: Social media is an incredible tool that cannot be ignored any longer. The speed at which individuals communicate has changed in the last several years as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, and an assortment of other social media networks continue to crop up. The Pasco Sheriff’s Office seeks to remain at the forefront of this community engagement by engaging followers on social media. The goal of the Sheriff’s Office social media is to show individuals what the Sheriff’s Office faces each day out on shift and to also inform the public of Sheriff’s Office actions while humanizing those who wear the badge every day. As such, the Sheriff’s Office social media plan is a combination of fact based information, humanizing tweets, and showing a lighter side to social media with the ultimate goal of informing and building our audience. Regardless of why an individual chooses to follow the Sheriff’s Office, they will receive our information and be aware of any changes in their community. It is important to remember that each and every post serves to educate and promote our standing in the community. The Sheriff’s Office currently is most active on Facebook and Twitter. Facebook, an ever growing medium that skews towards a slightly older audience, is not used as frequently as Twitter but does receive more fact based and community based posts as described below in the “Should I post…” section. Facebook does not receive engagement, GIFs, or trending topics but it is a tool to push out safety information, arrests, and humanizing efforts such as Behind the 1 Badge posts or Get to Know the PSO.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Will Be Subject to Additions and Corrections the Early History of El Museo Del Barrio Is Complex
    This timeline and exhibition chronology is in process INTRODUCTION and will be subject to additions and corrections The early history of El Museo del Barrio is complex. as more information comes to light. All artists’ It is intertwined with popular struggles in New York names have been input directly from brochures, City over access to, and control of, educational and catalogues, or other existing archival documentation. cultural resources. Part and parcel of the national We apologize for any oversights, misspellings, or Civil Rights movement, public demonstrations, inconsistencies. A careful reader will note names strikes, boycotts, and sit-ins were held in New York that shift between the Spanish and the Anglicized City between 1966 and 1969. African American and versions. Names have been kept, for the most part, Puerto Rican parents, teachers and community as they are in the original documents. However, these activists in Central and East Harlem demanded variations, in themselves, reveal much about identity that their children— who, by 1967, composed the and cultural awareness during these decades. majority of the public school population—receive an education that acknowledged and addressed their We are grateful for any documentation that can diverse cultural heritages. In 1969, these community- be brought to our attention by the public at large. based groups attained their goal of decentralizing This timeline focuses on the defining institutional the Board of Education. They began to participate landmarks, as well as the major visual arts in structuring school curricula, and directed financial exhibitions. There are numerous events that still resources towards ethnic-specific didactic programs need to be documented and included, such as public that enriched their children’s education.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatening Immigrants: Cultural Depictions of Undocumented Mexican Immigrants in Contemporary Us America
    THREATENING IMMIGRANTS: CULTURAL DEPICTIONS OF UNDOCUMENTED MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS IN CONTEMPORARY US AMERICA Katharine Lee Schaab A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2015 Committee: Jolie Sheffer, Advisor Lisa Hanasono Graduate Faculty Representative Rebecca Kinney Susana Peña © 2015 Katharine Schaab All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Jolie Sheffer, Advisor This project analyzes how contemporary US cultural and legislative texts shape US society’s impression of undocumented (im)migrants and whether they fit socially constructed definitions of what it means to “be American” or part of the US national imaginary. I argue that (im)migrant-themed cultural texts, alongside legal policies, participate in racial formation projects that use racial logic to implicitly mark (im)migrants as outsiders while actively employing ideologies rooted in gender, economics, and nationality to rationalize (im)migrants’ exclusion or inclusion from the US nation-state. I examine the tactics anti- and pro-(im)migrant camps utilize in suppressing the role of race—particularly the rhetorical strategies that focus on class, nation, and gender as rationale for (im)migrants’ inclusion or exclusion—in order to expose the similar strategies governing contemporary US (im)migration thought and practice. This framework challenges dichotomous thinking and instead focuses on gray areas. Through close readings of political and cultural texts focused on undocumented (im)migration (including documentaries, narrative fiction, and photography), this project homes in on the gray areas between seemingly pro- and anti-(im)migrant discourses. I contend (im)migration-themed political and popular rhetoric frequently selects a specific identity marker (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 14-1670 in the UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for the Sixth Circuit DETROIT FREE PRESS, INC, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. UNITED S
    No. 14-1670 In The UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Sixth Circuit DETROIT FREE PRESS, INC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 36 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEE SEEKING AFFIRMATION Bruce D. Brown Counsel of Record Katie Townsend Adam A. Marshall The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press 1156 15th St. NW, Suite 1250 Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: (202) 795-9300 [email protected] All amici listed on the next page. LIST OF AMICI CURIAE 1. American Society of News Editors 2. The Associated Press 3. Association of Alternative Newsmedia 4. The Association of American Publishers, Inc. 5. Bloomberg L.P. 6. Cable News Network, Inc. 7. California Newspaper Publishers Association 8. Cox Media Group, Inc. 9. Dow Jones & Company, Inc. 10. The E.W. Scripps Company 11. First Amendment Coalition 12. First Look Media 13. Forbes Media LLC 14. Hearst Corporation 15. The McClatchy Company 16. MediaNews Group, Inc. 17. National Newspaper Association 18. The National Press Club 19. National Press Photographers Association 20. National Public Radio, Inc. 21. New England First Amendment Coalition 22. New England Newspaper and Press Association, Inc. 23. New England Society of Newspaper Editors 24. The New York Times Company 25. News Corp 26. Newspaper Association of America 27. North Jersey Media Group Inc. 28. Online News Association 29. Radio Television Digital News Association 30. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Mugshots, Privacy, and the Right to Access Eumi K
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 2018 Monetizing Shame: Mugshots, Privacy, and the Right to Access Eumi K. Lee UC Hastings College of the Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Eumi K. Lee, Monetizing Shame: Mugshots, Privacy, and the Right to Access, 70 Rutgers U. L. Rev. 557 (2018). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship/1669 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 70 SPRING 2018 ISSUE 3 MONETIZING SHAME: MUGSHOTS, PRIVACY, AND THE RIGHT TO ACCESS Eumi K Lee* ABSTRACT Created for the purpose of criminal identification and investigation, mugshots have become a commodity in the digital era, exploited for financial gain. Although much public attention has been focused on commercial mugshot websites and their practice of charging fees for the removal of these images, the problem is far more widespread. Law enforcement agencies, news outlets, and tabloids have created modern-day "rogues'galleries" online, indiscriminately publishing mugshots of individuals, many of whom were never prosecuted or convicted. The mass publicationof mugshots online permanently stigmatizes millions of Americans with the mark of criminality and undermines two basic principles of our criminal justice system-presumed innocence and redemption. This Article explores the commodification and commercialization of mugshots and the constitutional and statutory laws that govern their availability.
    [Show full text]
  • Senado De Puerto Rico Diario De Sesiones Procedimientos Y Debates De La Decimocuarta Asamblea Legislativa Sexta Sesion Ordinaria Año 2003 Vol
    SENADO DE PUERTO RICO DIARIO DE SESIONES PROCEDIMIENTOS Y DEBATES DE LA DECIMOCUARTA ASAMBLEA LEGISLATIVA SEXTA SESION ORDINARIA AÑO 2003 VOL. LII San Juan, Puerto Rico Jueves, 2 de octubre de 2003 Núm. 14 A las once y treinta y dos minutos de la mañana (11:32 a.m.) de este día, jueves, 2 de octubre de 2003, el Senado reanuda sus trabajos bajo la Presidencia del señor Antonio J. Fas Alzamora. ASISTENCIA Senadores: Modesto L. Agosto Alicea, Luz Z. Arce Ferrer, Eudaldo Báez Galib, Norma Burgos Andújar, Juan A. Cancel Alegría, Norma Carranza De León, José Luis Dalmau Santiago, Velda González de Modestti, Sixto Hernández Serrano, Rafael L. Irizarry Cruz, Pablo Lafontaine Rodríguez, Fernando J. Martín García, Kenneth McClintock Hernández, Yasmín Mejías Lugo, José Alfredo Ortiz-Daliot, Margarita Ostolaza Bey, Migdalia Padilla Alvelo, Orlando Parga Figueroa, Sergio Peña Clos, Roberto L. Prats Palerm, Miriam J. Ramírez, Bruno A. Ramos Olivera, Jorge Alberto Ramos Vélez, Julio R. Rodríguez Gómez, Angel M. Rodríguez Otero, Rafael A. Rodríguez Vargas, Cirilo Tirado Rivera, Roberto Vigoreaux Lorenzana y Antonio J. Fas Alzamora, Presidente. SR. PRESIDENTE: Se reanuda la sesión. INVOCACION El Reverendo Heriberto Martínez y el Diácono José A. Morales, miembros del Cuerpo de Capellanes del Senado de Puerto Rico, proceden con la Invocación. REVERENDO MARTINEZ: Buenos días a todos y que la paz de Dios nos acompañe siempre. Hacemos lectura de una porción bíblica que se encuentra en el Libro de Eclesiastés, Capítulo 4, titulada: “Todo tiene su tiempo”. Y reza la palabra de Dios, en el Nombre del Padre del Hijo y del Espíritu Santo: “Todo tiene su tiempo, y todo lo que se quiere debajo del cielo tiene su hora”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Beginner's Guide to Twitter
    A Beginner’s Guide to Twitter Twitter isn’t just for celebrity gossip and breaking news headlines. It is a really useful tool for campaigners. One way of looking at it is as a fast-track way of bringing like-minded people together. It can help us make contacts with others who share our interests - and campaign objectives - be they all around the world or in our own backyard. It’s a great way of discussing hot topics, sharing ideas and making plans. In a way it is similar to a giant online forum that is more public, allowing more people to join in. And because it updates all the time, things can move far more quickly. Wait a minute, start at the beginning. What is Twitter? It is a website that allows you to set up your own profile (much like Facebook) with your own user name which you can use to publish short messages (or tweets) - a maximum of 140 characters long. Sometimes it is called microblogging. Most people who use Twitter do so publicly. That means that everyone can see their tweets, which is what Twitter thrives on - open discussion. Not that you would listen to everything everyone is saying at once. Instead, there are ways for you cut to the chase and make sure you only see what you want. Follow people The main way you can filter what tweets you see is by ‘following’ specific people, groups or organisations. By following them, these accounts’ tweets will show up in your ‘timeline’, which is usually what displays when you have logged into Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Mugshot Visual Essay 2 May 13.Pdf
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Lashmar, P. (2014). How to humiliate and shame: a reporter's guide to the power of the mugshot. Social Semiotics, 24(1), pp. 56-87. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2013.827358 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/18365/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2013.827358 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] How to humiliate and shame: A reporter's guide to the power of the mugshot. Paul Lashmar, Brunel University Introduction The ‘mugshot’ – the police or prison photograph – is a ubiquitous and instantly recognisable form, appearing in the media, on the internet, on book covers, law enforcement noticeboards and used ironically on tee-shirts and tea mugs. The mugshot is simple and specific early sub genus of the photographic portrait, again of the wider taxon, the portrait.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Applications KIK- Messaging App That Allows Users to Join Groups Or Direct Message Other Users. Photos/Videos Can Be
    Popular Applications KIK- Messaging App That Allows Users to Join Groups or Direct Message Other Users. Photos/Videos Can Be Sent, and All Can Be Deleted by Deleting the Application. WhatsApp- A Messaging Service That Lets Users Exchange Unlimited Text, Audio, Phone Calls, Photo and Video Messages. Messages Are Encrypted Telegram- A cloud-based instant messaging and voice over IP service. Telegram client apps are available for Android, iOS, Windows Phone, Windows NT, macOS and Linux.[16] Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. Messages can also be sent with client-to-client encryption in so-called secret chats. Unlike Telegram's cloud-based messages, messages sent within a secret chat can be accessed only on the device upon which the secret chat was initiated and the device upon which the secret chat was accepted; they cannot be accessed on other devices. Messages sent within secret chats can, in principle, be deleted at any time and can optionally self-destruct. Whisper - A proprietary iOS and Android mobile app available without charge. It is a form of anonymous social media, allowing users to post and share photo and video messages anonymously. You can respond to a message publicly or privately, choosing a public anonymous post or a private pseudonymous chat. Mocospace - Site similar to other social networking sites. Features include mobile games, chat, instant messaging, eCards, and photos Houseparty - A social networking service that enables group video chatting through mobile and desktop apps. Users receive a notification when friends are online and available to group video chat.
    [Show full text]