DOCSLIB.ORG

Resilient Packet Ring Network.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resilient Packet Ring Network.Pdf An Introduction To RPR John Lemon Chair, IEEE 802.17 Senior Staff Scientist, ADTRAN Agenda Overview Features How it works Questions An Introduction To RPR 3 Overview What Resilient packet ring IEEE Std 802.17-2004 Primarily for metropolitan area networks Alternative to TDM and mesh networks Medium access control method and physical layer specification ± Physical layer agnostic An Introduction To RPR 5 Who Best of Cisco DPT, Luminous RPT, and Nortel IPT Additions from WG Products offered by ADTRAN, Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, Huawei, Nortel, « An Introduction To RPR 6 When Study Group formed May 2000 Working Group created December 2000 Standard approved September 2004 802.17a approved September 2004 ± Adds support of 802.17 to 802.1D bridging standard 802.17b approved March 2007 ± Adds spatial reuse to bridged and multicast traffic 802.17c started March 2007 ± Adding Protected Inter-Ring Connection (PIRC) An Introduction To RPR 7 Why SONET viewed to have problems with ± Equipment expense ± Operational difficulty ± Provisioning lag time ± Efficiency ± Fairness Ethernet viewed to have problems with ± SLAs ± Resiliency ± Fairness Both ± Limitations in physical layers An Introduction To RPR 8 Features Features « Resiliency ± Sub 50 ms detect and repair ± Lossless ± No single point of failure Efficiency ± Spatial reuse ± Temporal reuse Real SLAs ± Each class of traffic guaranteed its needs ± Not relative QoS An Introduction To RPR 10 Features (continued) Fairness ± Weighted fairness Not necessarily equality Plug-and-play ± No single point of control ± Little or no provisioning ± Topology flexible ± Capability flexible An Introduction To RPR 11 How Resiliency Choice of two sub-50 ms protection mechanisms ± Steering: optimized for minimizing packet re-ordering for TDM and video services and to preserve bandwidth utilization Default protection method that is always supported ± Wrapping: optimized to minimize immediate packet-loss for data services Optional protection method that may be supported An Introduction To RPR 13 Topology Aware Protection Wrapping Wrapped path wraps at both A and E Topology information Break in path from B to D used at edges A Original path from B to D Continued use during protection Unplanned use B during protection E Steered path is steered at B Unplanned use during protection D Steering C Topology information used at source An Introduction To RPR 14 Protection Protocol Send local information on changes and periodically ± TP frame sent 8 times fast (10 ms), then slow (100 ms) ± TC frame sent 4 times fast, then reverts to slow Update database with new received information, and calculate local and remote edge & protection states ± Includes detecting a station entering or exiting passthrough²changing presence on ring without intervening disconnection (AKA optical passthrough) Alter local edge/protection states, if preempted Update reachability and validity information in database An Introduction To RPR 15 Efficiency Spatial reuse ± Packets removed from the ring at destination ± Remainder of ring not occupied with wasted traffic Temporal reuse ± Unused BW reclaimed and distributed An Introduction To RPR 16 Real SLAs BW allocations restored upon demand ± Class based prioritization allows restoration within delay and jitter requirements for SLAs ± Allows full utilization and hard SLAs without reserving BW FR/ATM-derived classes of service Class of service Quality of service Name Example use Subclass Guaranteed Delay/jitter Bandwidth Bandwidth bandwidth type subtype classA real time subclassA0 yes low allocated reserved subclassA1 reclaimable classB near real time classB-CIR yes bounded allocated classB-EIR no unbounded opportunistic classC best effort An Introduction To RPR 17 Fairness S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3 6 Mb/s 6 Mb/s 6 Mb/s 6 Mb/s 6 Mb/s 6 Mb/s 6 Mb/s 6 Mb/s 6 Mb/s equal unequal w w w weighted 6w 2w 2w weighted 0 Mb/s shapers shapers 2 Mb/s 4 Mb/s 3.3 Mb/s 10 Mb/s 2 Mb/s available 3.3 Mb/s capacity 6 Mb/s 6 Mb/s 3.3 Mb/s Unfairness Equal Fairness Weighted Fairness An Introduction To RPR 18 Fairness Concepts KEY Fairness rate advertising downstream congested (advertisedRate < FULL_RATE) Fairness rate advertising downstream uncongested (advertisedRate == FULL_RATE) data frame tail congestion head domain A local station congestionPoint hopsToCongestion ringlet0 data S0 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 not part of not part of any ringlet0 fairness any congestion message feedback congestion domain domain S254 S9 S8 S7 S6 congestion domain B head tail An Introduction To RPR 19 Spatial Reuse and Fairness Node A reduces red traffic, not Increased utilization blue traffic of fiber by re-using A bandwidth on all ring H B spans Congestion notification ± Destination stripping C G ± Ring spans following Node C destination are Node C reduces available for additional experiences green congestion D traffic traffic F E An Introduction To RPR 20 Assuring SLA At Each Node + + 3 Best Effort services Single SLA-based services Out-of-profile customerƞs Classify Traffic services to Dedicated TB BW services Ring P In-profile + 2 Token Bucket shaper TB Discard Excess Rate 1 Rate policer P + An Introduction To RPR From other customers 21 Bandwidth Sharing/Scheduling Dedicated BW Shared BW SLA Shared BW best services based services effort services Out-Of-Profile (EIR) P P P P P P In-Profile (CIR) B A Send Send C Within Within Send Within provisioned provisioned fair rates rates MAC-client usage MAC AB C Congestion P P F? message Fair usage expected A Ringlet PTQ 3 4 Rx 2 Ringlet Tx Class? 1 + B & C STQ 5 An Introduction To RPR 22 Additional Fairness Rules Scheduled only if: Dedicated BW Shared BW SLA Shared BW best services based services effort services ± No imminent Out-Of-Profile (EIR) P loss in STQ P P P P P Scheduled to In-Profile (CIR) B fair rate if: A Send Send C Within Within Send Within provisioned provisioned ± Congestion fair rates rates MAC-client usage present MAC AB C Congestion P P message downstream F? Fair usage expected A Scheduled to Ringlet PTQ 3 4 Rx 2 Ringlet Tx full rate when: Class? 1 + B & C STQ 5 ± Above conditions don¶t An Introduction To RPR exist 23 Plug-And-Play Every station on a ring knows: ± What other stations are on the ring ± The topology of the ring ± The protection status of all the stations ± The attributes of all the stations Time critical information sent via TP frames Less time-critical information sent on changes and periodically, via ATD frame (1 s) On receipt of TP or ATD frames, local database updated with new information, ring-wide values calculated An Introduction To RPR 24 Topology Protocol Send local information on change & periodically via shared use of TP frame Update database with new received information, and calculate hops away, reachable, valid, etc. Validate database ± Consistency (e.g., if A-B-C on ringlet0 then C-B-A on ringlet1) ± All reachable stations valid ± Fewer than MAX_STATIONS Compare checksum with neighbor during validation (for context containment) An Introduction To RPR 25 Automatic Topology Discovery Local topology A Topology and Protection information is broadcast (TP) frames periodically and provide local information triggered on change B E Topology Checksum (TC) frames D provide local view Each station computes full C of topology topology independently and compares with neighbors periodically and triggered on change An Introduction To RPR 26 RPR For MSOs Bundled Services for SMB Headend Voice/TDM Switch Router 10Mb RPR DS3 MTU OC3 GE 10Mb RPR T1 Business B RPR 50Mb T1 Business A An Introduction To RPR 28 Multi-Site Service Headend Voice/TDM 10Mb Switch Router T1 Branch C 100Mb RPR OC3 OC3 GE MTU 10Mb RPR T1 Branch A RPR 100Mb T1 Headquarters An Introduction To RPR 29 Remote Access Service Headend Voice/TDM 10Mb Switch Router T1 Branch C 100Mb RPR OC3 OC3 GE MTU 10Mb RPR 1 T Branch A RPR 100Mb T1 Headquarters An Introduction To RPR 30 Mixed Metro Access Branch Small Office GbE Office Mobile Base Station Branch Office Park I nternet & 10/100 10/100 T1 &/or POTS GbE T1 10/100 AN POP Hospital GbE Multiport GbE Aggregation Point / Enterprise Campus CMTS Head End GbE 10/100 SM Businesses T1 or 10/100 Residential Customers Company HQ T1 School/ ¡ollege WiFi Hotspot Internet & GbE GbE POTS CMTS GbE ¡MTS An Introduction To RPR Residential Customers Residential ¡ustomers 31 For More Information Website: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/17/ Free copy of the standard: http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/802.17.html An Introduction To RPR 32 Questions? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INTRODUCTION Client
    1 INTRODUCTION Client Server Network Fig. 1-1. A network with two clients and one server. Client machine Server machine Request Network Reply Client process Server process Fig. 1-2. The client-server model involves requests and replies. Fig. 1-3. In a peer-to-peer system there are no fixed clients and servers. 2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 21 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222Tag1 Full name1 Example 1 1 1 1 1 12222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222B2C1 Business-to-consumer1 Ordering books on-line 1 21 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222B2B1 Business-to-business1 Car manufacturer ordering tires from supplier 1 21 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222G2C1 Government-to-consumer1 Government distributing tax forms electronically 1 1 1 1 1 12222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222C2C1 Consumer-to-consumer1 Auctioning second-hand products on line 1 21 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222P2P1 Peer-to-peer1 File sharing 1 Fig. 1-4. Some forms of e-commerce. 22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222221 Wireless1 Mobile1 Applications 1 1 1 1 1 122222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222No1 No1 Desktop computers in offices 1 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222221
    [Show full text]
  • Network Reliability and Fault Tolerance
    Network Reliability and Fault Tolerance Muriel Medard´ [email protected] Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems Room 35-212 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139 Steven S. Lumetta [email protected] Coordinated Science Laboratory University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign 1308 W. Main Street, Urbana, IL 61801 1 Introduction The majority of communications applications, from cellular telephone conversations to credit card transactions, assume the availability of a reliable network. At this level, data are expected to tra- verse the network and to arrive intact at their destination. The physical systems that compose a network, on the other hand, are subjected to a wide range of problems, ranging from signal distor- tion to component failures. Similarly, the software that supports the high-level semantic interface 1 often contains unknown bugs and other latent reliability problems. Redundancy underlies all ap- proaches to fault tolerance. Definitive definitions for all concepts and terms related to reliability, and, more broadly, dependability, can be found in [AAC+92]. Designing any system to tolerate faults first requires the selection of a fault model, a set of possible failure scenarios along with an understanding of the frequency, duration, and impact of each scenario. A simple fault model merely lists the set of faults to be considered; inclusion in the set is decided based on a combination of expected frequency, impact on the system, and feasibility or cost of providing protection. Most reliable network designs address the failure of any single component, and some designs tolerate multiple failures. In contrast, few attempt to handle the adversarial conditions that might occur in a terrorist attack, and cataclysmic events are almost never addressed at any scale larger than a city.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Emerging Broadband Technologies on the Converged
    The Role of Emerging Broadband Technologies on the Converged Packet-Based Network Introduction The vision of network convergence toward a consolidated packet-based network has been discussed for years, though it is still not a reality. Currently, there are numerous overlay networks such as IP, ATM, FR, Ethernet, SONET, DWDM and wireless for different services. The evolution pace toward convergence has been slow due to economic, technical and regulatory issues. However, the fact is that data traffic volume is now surpassing voice traffic volume. Traditional TDM voice traffic is moving to IP packets and TDM private line is moving to Ethernet private line. The wave of broadband applications such as Internet access, VOD, and IPTV create high bandwidth requirements for the network. These applications are packet-based, but have a much lower margin of profit for the service providers when compared to traditional voice service. Today’s overlay and traditional circuit-based infrastructure will become less optimal for the new packet-based services as the profit margin decreases. Most of the wireless networks in North America today are still circuit-based because most of the current wireless service is still voice-based. However, with emerging wireless access technologies such as WiMAX and Wi-Fi, more broadband wireless data and video services can be deployed. As a result, the wireless core network evolves toward a packet-based network. Service offerings drive network evolution. As more packet-based broadband services are launched and bundled together in service offerings, service providers start to add more packet-aware features into their current network components.
    [Show full text]
  • Congestion Control in Resilient Packet Ring Networks
    New Jersey Institute of Technology Digital Commons @ NJIT Dissertations Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 1-31-2005 Congestion control in resilient packet ring networks Alharbi Fahd New Jersey Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/dissertations Part of the Electrical and Electronics Commons Recommended Citation Fahd, Alharbi, "Congestion control in resilient packet ring networks" (2005). Dissertations. 670. https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/dissertations/670 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Digital Commons @ NJIT. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ NJIT. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Physical with Ethernet
    ETHERNET GETTING PHYSICAL STANDARDS • The Importance of Standards • Standards are necessary in almost every business and public service entity. For example, before 1904, fire hose couplings in the United States were not standard, which meant a fire department in one community could not help in another community. The transmission of electric current was not standardized until the end of the nineteenth century, so customers had to choose between Thomas Edison’s direct current (DC) and George Westinghouse’s alternating current (AC). IEEE 802 STANDARD • IEEE 802 is a family of IEEE standards dealing with local area networks and metropolitan area networks. • More specifically, the IEEE 802 standards are restricted to networks carrying variable-size packets. By contrast, in cell relay networks data is transmitted in short, uniformly sized units called cells. Isochronous , where data is transmitted as a steady stream of octets, or groups of octets, at regular time intervals, are also out of the scope of this standard. The number 802 was simply the next free number IEEE could assign,[1] though “802” is sometimes associated with the date the first meeting was held — February 1980. • The IEEE 802 family of standards is maintained by the IEEE 802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee (LMSC). The most widely used standards are for the Ethernet family, Token Ring, Wireless LAN, Bridging and Virtual Bridged LANs. An individual working group provides the focus for each area. Name Description Note IEEE 802.1 Higher Layer LAN Protocols (Bridging) active IEEE 802.2
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE Plenary - Lajolla, CA RPRSG Meeting Minutes July 11-13 2000
    IEEE Plenary - LaJolla, CA RPRSG Meeting Minutes July 11-13 2000 7/11/2000 8:43AM 30 attendees Presentations may be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/rprsg/public/july_plenary/index.html ACTION items in text Motion#1- The RPRSG voting rules amended to require: 1) 75% approval vote for technical issues 2) 50% +1 approval vote for procedural issues Motion: Harry Peng Second:Raj Sharma Yes:20 No:0 Minutes will be approved 8/12/2000 Presentation - Performance Metrics IEEE 802 RPRSG Khaled Amer Discussion - Ring Restoration performance metric will be added Ring performance stability with traffic flow changes Define Ingress/Egress access connection Bit Rate and Traffic characteristics Can Egress rate be below ring rate? Which mechanism? Simulation scenarios should be included ingress=egress traffic ports Change Bit rate to data rate in presentation Define L2/L1 mapping for consistency (mapping delay, etc.) Define L1 data rate - SONET vs. GigE Define L1 model ( packetization delay) metrics Sharing of model source code discussion Presentation - IPR(Intellectual Property Rights) issues Gary Robinson Presentation - Assessment of Scalable Coherent Interface Jason Fan Presentation - Resilient Packet Ring 5 Criteria (Compatibility) BJ Lee Discussion - Ethernet (SNAP encapsulation) and LLC over MAC sublayer correction Page 5- SRP TTL field 8 bits 802.1D compatibility (transparent bridging) and jumbo frame support Compatibility discussion tabled until PAR discussion Decision not to preclude 802.1D bridging Presentation - IEEE 802 Compatibility Considerations
    [Show full text]
  • Cisco Next Generation Routing
    A B NGR Brochure Cisco Next Generation Routing Section 1 Issues for networking in the Broadband Era Section 2 Next Generation WAN Services using MPLS Section 3 Cisco's Next Generation IP Network Solution Section 4 Cisco’s Next Generation Optical Ring Solution Section 5 Service differentiation and Quality of Service Section 6 Service with Security Section 7 Cisco Next Generation Routers – Core and Edge Section 8 Cisco Next Generation Routers – Access W NGR Brochure 12400 series 3700 series 12416 7600 series 12410 7300 series 2600XM/2691 series 10000 series 7609 7613 12406 7304 12404 1700/1760 series 7301 7606 7400 series 7603 10700 series SOHO and 800 series Larg SoH SM e Bra o B / Enterprise nch CPE Cisco Next Generation Routing (NGR) Solution Next Generation Internet in the Broadband Era Broadband networking is rapidly expanding in usage; consequently, routers Innovative Next Generation metro IP solution must support an ever growing range of features and service capabilities to RPR (Resilient Packet Ring), represents a key technology for the meet the unique needs of this high growth area. As the world's leading router deployment of advanced IP ring technology. RPR is used by a large manufacturer, Cisco’s routers are in widespread use, helping to support and number of customers in the metro access arena, for providing an expand the development and usage of the Internet and its rich service base. It advanced, industry-first, IP-based metro Ethernet access solution. This is Cisco's charter to continue this focused development, building upon the ensures an optimum linkage between the router and the Ethernet base, a success of Cisco deployments to date.
    [Show full text]
  • CPE 426 Computer Networks: Term 1-56 Homework 1 Wk 3 Solutions
    ภาคเรียนที่ 1/2556 วิชา CPE426 Computer Networks: HW Wk3; Review 3+TCP/IP Concept 1 ชื่อ______________________________________รหัส_____________________Section________ CPE 426 Computer Networks: Term 1-56 Homework 1 Wk 3 Solutions Review III: LAN Technologies and Chapter 20: TCP/IP Concept ใหนกศั ึกษาแสดงคําตอบโดยเขียนลงในชองว างที่ใหไว สงตนชั่วโมงสัปดาหถัดไป 1. ใหนักศึกษาเขา Web Site ของ IEEE หรือ Search จาก IEEE802 Standard จากนั้นใหหาวามาตรฐาน IEEE802 ตอไปนี้เปน มาตรฐานของอะไร ตอไปนี้เปนขอมูลจาก http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802 IEEE 802 Working Groups Name Description Note IEEE 802.1 Bridging (networking) and Network Management IEEE 802.2 LLC inactive IEEE 802.3 Ethernet IEEE 802.4 Token bus disbanded IEEE 802.5 Defines the MAC layer for a Token Ring inactive IEEE 802.6 MANs (DQDB) disbanded IEEE 802.7 Broadband LAN using Coaxial Cable disbanded IEEE 802.8 Fiber Optic TAG disbanded IEEE 802.9 Integrated Services LAN (ISLAN or isoEthernet) disbanded IEEE 802.10 Interoperable LAN Security disbanded IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n Wireless LAN (WLAN) & Mesh (Wi-Fi certification) IEEE 802.12 100BaseVG disbanded IEEE 802.13 Unused[2] IEEE 802.14 Cable modems disbanded IEEE 802.15 Wireless PAN IEEE 802.15.1 Bluetooth certification IEEE 802.15.2 IEEE 802.15 and IEEE 802.11 coexistence IEEE 802.15.3 High-Rate wireless PAN Low-Rate wireless PAN (e.g., ZigBee, WirelessHART, IEEE 802.15.4 MiWi, etc.) IEEE 802.15.5 Mesh networking for WPAN IEEE 802.15.6 Body area network ภาควิชาวิศวกรรมคอมพิวเตอร วิทยาลัยวิศวกรรมศาสตร มหาวิทยาลัยรังสิต ภาคเรียนที่ 1/2556
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Guideguide Industrial ETHERNET
    Hirschmann Automation and Control GmbH PocketPocket GuideGuide Industrial ETHERNET Hirschmann Competence Center Edition 2006 Copyright © 2006 Hirschmann Automation and Control GmbH All Rights Reserved Permission is not given for the circulation or reproduction of this document, its use or the passing on of its contents unless granted expressly. Contravention renders the perpetrator liable for compensation for damages. All rights reserved, in particular in the case of patent grant or registration of a utility or design. The information/details in this publication merely contain general descriptions or performance factors which, when applied in an actual situation, do not always correspond with the described form, and may be amended by way of the further development of products. The desired performance factors shall only be deemed binding if these are expressly agreed on conclusion of the contract. In 1984 Hirschmann created the first fiber optic ETHERNET network at the University of Stuttgart. In 1990 Hirschmann also invented the ”Redundant ETHERNET Ring“ and finally in 1998 we brought out the HIPER-Ring (Hirsch- mann Performance Redundancy Ring) in switched ETHERNET. Hirschmann is the only manufacturer worldwide offer a universal product range for setting up high-performance, high-availablity industrial networks. From the networking of production lines via the control room using SCADA applications to the enterprise environment - vertical integration - everything from a single source. 1 Contents Contents Page 1 Know-How for the World of
    [Show full text]
  • Ciena Acronyms Guide.Pdf
    The Acronyms Guide edited by Erin Malone Chris Janson 1st edition Publisher Acknowledgement: This is the first edition of this book. Please notify us of any acronyms we may have missed by submitting them via the form at www.ciena.com/acronymsguide. We will be happy to include them in further editions of “The Acronyms Guide”. For additional information on Ciena’s Carrier Ethernet or Optical Communications Certification programs please contact [email protected]. Table of Contents Numerics ..........................1 A .......................................1 B .......................................2 C .......................................3 D .......................................5 E .......................................7 F........................................9 G .....................................10 H .....................................11 I .......................................12 J ......................................14 K .....................................14 L ......................................14 M ....................................15 N .....................................17 O.....................................18 P .....................................20 Q.....................................22 R .....................................22 S......................................23 T .....................................26 U .....................................28 V .....................................29 W ....................................29 X .....................................30 Z......................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Reisslein School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering Ira A
    Martin Reisslein School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering Arizona State University P.O. Box 875706, Tempe, AZ 85287-5706 Phone: (480)965-8593, Fax: (480)965-8325 [email protected], http://mre.faculty.asu.edu EDUCATION University of Pennsylvania Ph. D. in Systems Engineering, August 1998 Thesis: Managing Prerecorded Traffic in Packet{Switched Networks Advisor: Dr. Keith W. Ross M. S. E. in Electrical Engineering, August 1996 Fachhochschule Dieburg, Germany Diplom{Ingenieur(FH) in Electrical Engineering, 1994 ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University Program Chair, Computer Engineering, January 2018 { present School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University Professor, August 2011 { present Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University Associate Professor, August 2005 { August 2011 Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University Assistant Professor, October 2000 { August 2005 German National Research Center for Information Technology (GMD FOKUS) and Technical University Berlin Post{doctoral Researcher and Lecturer, August 1998 { October 2000 PRINCIPAL AREAS of TEACHING AND RESEARCH Teaching • Communication Networks and Multimedia Networking • Electrical Networks and Digital Design Fundamentals • Performance Evaluation of Computer Networks Research • Characterization and Network Transport of Multimedia Traffic Martin Reisslein 2 • Optical-Wireless Access and Metropolitan Area Networks • 5G Wireless Network Systems • Software Defined Networking • Ultra-low Latency Networking • Engineering Education and K-12 Outreach MAJOR AWARDS AND PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITIONS Career Award from United States National Science Foundation, 2002 Best Tutorial Paper Award from IEEE Communications Society, 2008 Elevation to IEEE Fellow, 2014 Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel Research Award from Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, 2015 DRESDEN Senior Fellow, Technical University Dresden, Germany, 2016, 2019 IEEE Transactions on Education Theodore E.
    [Show full text]
  • ZXCTN 9004 Product Description
    Operator Logo ZXCTN 9004 Product Description ZXCTN 9004 Product Description ZXCTN 9004 Product Description Version Date Author Approved By Remarks R0 2009-08-21 Wang Ning He Ping Not open to the Third Party © 2010 ZTE Corporation. All rights reserved. ZTE CONFIDENTIAL: This document contains proprietary information of ZTE and is not to be disclosed or used without the prior written permission of ZTE. Due to update and improvement of ZTE products and technologies, information in this document is subjected to change without notice. ZTE Confidential Proprietary © 2009 ZTE Corporation. All rights reserved. I Content TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 1 2 Highlights .................................................................................................................... 3 3 Functions and Features ............................................................................................. 5 3.1.1 Service processing capability ...................................................................................... 5 3.1.2 Interface type and quantity .......................................................................................... 6 3.2 Multi-service bearing capability.................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 TDM emulation ............................................................................................................ 7 3.2.2 ATM Emulation ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]