Reprinted from .lOCRNAL OF THE 'WASHINGTON ACADE),lY OF SCIENCES Volume 42, No.4, April 1952 Printed in U.S.A.

ENTOMOLOGY.-Notes on Bruchidae affecting the , including the description of a new . JOHN COLBURN BRIDWELL, Lignum, Va. (Com­ municated by Waldo L. Schmitt.)

Anyone interested in the Bruchidae is 1. GALL-MAKING BRUCHID OF Schinus intrigued by the relatively few that huigan (CHILE) diverge from the usual family habit of Kieffer and Herbst (Zeitschr. Wiss. Insekt.­ feeding their young in seeds of legumes by BioI. 1: 66. 1905) reported a bud gall in the attaching themselves to of other axils of the flowering twigs of Duvaua dependens families. We have three records of Bruchidae DC (= Schinus huigan Molina), which is affecting the Anacardiaceae, a family of described as follows: These are easily dislodged, plants represented in temperate North being attached at only a single point. The gall America almost entirely by the poly­ is ellipsoidal, 6-8 mm high by 5-6 mm broad, morphic genus Rhus, including the ~mmacs, naked, red flecked with white, the middle of the poison ivy, and smokebush. The genera flecks sometimes tuberculately prominent. The affected by Bruchidae are Chilean and texture of the gall is somewhat woody. Within Brazilian, and both are close allies of Rhus. the gall lies a thick curved footless larva These genera are Duvaua Kunth, now with the body gradually thickened behind, usually included in Schinus Linnaeus, which 8-9 mm long by 2-3 mm broad, naked except includes the "California" peppertree, and for some scattered hairs on the anterior seg­ Miers, which includes the Chilean ments, mandibles dark. litre, L. caustica (Molina) Hooker & Arnott This material was obtained by Pablo Herbst (venenosa Miers). between Santiago and Valparaiso on November APRIL 1952 BRIDWELL-BRUCHIDAE AFFECTING ANACARDIACEAE 125

3, and later a new species of Bruchus was reared certainly does affect the seeds of from these larvae. in Chile, and I have no doubt that he is right Since this still undescribed species is one of in his determination, for Bruchus elegans is a the few Bruchidae affecting plants in parts common, well-known, and strongly characterized other than seeds, it would be a useful work for species not likely to be mistaken.1 some of our Chilean friends to recover this Unfortunately, the appropriate specific name species and have it described. elegans Blanchard, 1851, is preoccupied by Bruchus elegans Sturm, 1845, a valid binomial, 2. Lithraeus electus FROM THE SEEDS and must be replaced. Furthermore, the varietal OF LITRE (CHILE) name obscurior Pic, 1902, is also preoccupied2 Prof. Carlos Porter (Revista Chilena Hist. and cannot take its place. The species is, I believe, Nat. 29: 286. 1925) reported determining the distinct enough to represent a separate genus, attractive Bruchus elegans Blanchard in material and Lithraeus is proposed with Bruchus elegans submitted to him for identification by Prof. Blanchard, 1851, as genotype. For the untenable Flaminio Ruiz, obtained by the latter from the specific name elegans the substitute electus seeds of litre, Lithraea caustica, from Sauzal is proposed, so that this beautiful seed weevil of (Province of O'Higgins) in January 1924. the litre may be known hereafter as Lithraeus Since Camacho (Algunos insectos perjudiciales electus. Ii las arvejas, frijoles, lentejas y otras legumbres y brucos del trebol, Servo Policia Sanit. Vej., Santiago Lithraeus, n. gen. (Bruchinae, Acanthoscelidini) de Chile, 1919: 22-23) had previously erroneously Genotype: Lithraeus electus, n. name reported this species affecting seeds of clover, Bruchus elegans Blanchard, 1851, not Sturm 1843. I sought confirmation for Professor Porter's Bruchus elegans obscurior Pic, 1902, not Bruchus record. With this in mind I examined several lots (Pseudoptinus) martini obscurior Pic, 1896. of seeds of litre in the collection of the Office Freshly emerged individuals of this elegant of Foreign Introduction, U. S. Depart­ Chilean bruchid may best be recognized by the ment of Agriculture. In one of these lots (S.P.I. pubescent markings, which later are often badly No. 27434) were found four seeds showing insect rubbed. With fine sericeous pubescence on head, injury. Three exhibited exit holes, evidently of body and legs above and below, invisible except some hymenopterous insect smaller than Bruchus when seen obliquely; sharply defined decorations elegans. This should be a parasite of a bruchid, of dense snowy white pubescence concealing the but it might also be some seed inhabiting chalcid. surface thus: a small quadrangle on median lobe Fortunately, the fourth seed still contained an of pronotum; on the small quadrate scutellum insect. When this was extracted from within its (emarginately bidentate at apex), narrow arcuate slight silken cocoon, there was found a nearly elytral fasciae extending obliquely forward from mature braconid identified by C. F. W. Muese­ near the middle of fourth stria to near basal beck as a species of Urosigalphus. Since some third of ninth, an elliptical fleck at the apex of of the species of Urosigalphus parasitize bruchids, the fourth and fifth striae, on mesepimeron, and others attack curculionids, the remains of the on narrow outer margin of metapleura, on outer beetle larva at the expense of which the Urosigal­ end of hind coxa and small maculae on extreme phus larva had nourished itself were extracted margin of sternites 2-4, narrow basal margin of and submitted to Dr. Adam Baving. The frag­ pygidium; less condensed and less definite pubes­ ments were sufficient to enable him to determine cent markings on posterolateral lobes or angles them positively as those of a bruchid larva. of pronotum and on its flank near front coxa. We may hope that ultimately the larvae of Small, 2.3-3.1 mm long by 1.3-1.6 mm broad, Bruchidae will be identifiable, since Dr. Baving ovate, shining black or reddish testaceus, with has admirably worked out the mouth parts almost all parts rufescent in some individuals; (Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 29: 133-143. 1927). However, the larva of Bruchus elegans 1 Since this part of this paper was prepared, is still undescribed, and so no matter how perfect repeated positive proof of this host relationship has been obtained. I do not have any confirmation the larva might be it would still be impossible to of Dr. Porter's subsequent record (Revista Chilena determine it to species. We were not, therefore, Rist. Nat. 43: 139-140. 1940) of its affecting Schinus quite able to confirm fully Professor Porter's molle L., the so-called "California" peppertree. 2 Bruchus (Pseudoptinus) martini obscurior Pic, record as to the species concerned. But a bruchid 1896, now referred to Ptinus. 126 JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES VOL. 42, No.4 head, prothorax, and body beneath generally only a minor part of the surface. These species black; antennae sometimes entirely black, some­ with longitudinally carinate hind tibiae and times with some basal joints reddish. Integument femur armed with tooth and denticles near apex everywhere micropunctulate, with coarser punc­ beneath are widely separated from Lithraeus by tures on head, pronotum, and hind coxa. Head the structure of the hind legs. Most genera of short, malar space short, temples abruptly Acanthoscelidini have longitudinal carinae on declivous; eyes normally convex and projecting, the hind tibiae: (1) One on outer face ending in a broadly emarginate for two-thirds their length, tooth at apex. (2) One on ventral margin ending separated on front by nearly the width of an eye. in the mucro at apex; (3) One on the surface Front punctured throughout, without a carina, between outer and ventral carinae, often con­ glabrous impunctate line, or area; antennae alike verging apically toward the ventral carina; (4) in the sexes, extending beyond base of pronotum One on the inner face, not related to any apical but not to hind coxa, with four narrow joints at structure. The complete absence of such carinae base, joint 5 triangularly expanded at apex, in Lithraeus distinguishes it from any other 6-10 nearly alike, subquadrate, closely applied to American bruchid genus known to me. each other, not at all serrate, 11 broadly ovate. Pronotum narrower than elytra and less than 3. A BRUCHID FROM THE SEEDS OF half as long; sides nearly straight, converging AROEIRA (BRAZIL) and suddenly rounded in front; dorsum nearly Gregorio Bondar, 1937, records a third even, convex, separated from flanks by a vestigial bruchid affecting a plant of the family Ana­ lateral carina bent down to the coxa. Elytra cardiaceae in Brazil (Rio) in his N otas biologicas with even surface, flat intervals, epipleural lobes sobre bruchideos observados no Brasil (Arch. well developed, humeri small, no basal tubercles, Inst. BioI. Vegetal 3: 7-44, figs. 1-61 [December, striae except 8 and 9 reaching base, 4 and 5 1936]), a work largely reprinted from previously abbreviate and joined at apex, striae perceptibly published papers in Correio Agricola (Bahia), punctured, well impressed; elytra broadest near a Campo (Rio de Janeiro), Revista de Entomo­ basal third, narrowed to apex, covering base of logia (Rio de Janeiro), and perhaps elsewhere, pygidium, not microserrulate at suture. Hind 1930-1932, the details of which I cannot here coxa broader than hind femur and broader than quote. This paper by Bondar is the most sig­ first sternite behind it, finely punctured except nificant single contribution to the biology of for the polished area along more than half the Bruchidae known to me. Bondar's too brief anterior margin; hind femur more than three note (p. 43) reads thus: "Bruchus atronotatus times as long as broad, not extending to apex of Pic. Cria-se en sementes de aroeira. Rio." abdomen, arcuate above, nearly straight be­ The bruchid species was described by Pic neath, sinuate before the small apical lamella; 1929, Melanges 54: 35, Bresil (type in colI. slightly flattened apically, inner margin with Pic). It was listed by Blackwelder, Checklist of vestigial carina usually bearing a slightly an­ the coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, gulate denticle; hind tibia straight, slightly the West Indies, and South America, U. S. Nat. broader toward apex, entirely without longi­ Mus. Bull. 185 (pt. 4): 758. 1946, as Acantho­ tudinal carinae, apex abruptly truncate, mucro seelides atronotatus Pic. I do not have the descrip­ short and but little different from the lateral tion before me, but I doubt if it would be of tooth which is near it, separated by a shallow service in determining the species if it is in any sinus; subdorsal denticles smaller, two or three way like Lithraeus elect us or particularly related in number. to it. Numerous American Bruchidae such as From Dr. Da Costa Lima's very useful Bruehus (Paehymerus) alboteetus Sharp, Bruehus "Indice das Plantas" in his Tereeiro catalogo dos (Paehymerus) inerustatus Gyllenhal, and Pseu­ insectos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil, Rio de dopaehymerus multimaeulatus and binotatus Pic, Janeiro, 1936, p. 426, we find the vernacular name which have been referred to Pseudopaehymerus aroeira with or without an adjective, brava, or Caryedes, from which they are generically mansa, or preta, applies to Lithraea brasiliensis. distinct, have the elytra with dense white pubes­ Aroeira vermelha or manza is Schinus terebin­ cence over most of the surface but in Lithraeus thifolius. My impression is that Bondar meant eleetus most of the elytron is covered with prac­ Lithraea brasiliensis as the host of Bruehus tically invisible pubescence and the white covers atronotatus.