DOCSLIB.ORG

Tanzania Pastoralists Threatened

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tanzania Pastoralists Threatened TANZANIAN PASTORALISTS THREATENED Evictions, Human Rights Violations and Loss of Livelihoods IWGIA Report 23 2016 TANZANIAN PASTORALISTS THREATENED: Evictions, Human Rights and Loss of Livehood Copyright: IWGIA Published by: IWGIA in collaboration with PINGO’s Forum, PAICODEO and UCRT Editors: IWGIA, Carol Sørensen and Diana Vinding Cover design and maps: Jorge Monrás Cover photo: Carol Sørensen Prepress and print: Eks-Skolens Trykkeri, Copenhagen, Denmark The reproduction and distribution of information contained in this report is welcome for non-commercial purposes and as long as the source is cited. The translation of the report or the reproduction of the whole report requires the consent of IWGIA. Huridocs Cip data Title: IWGIA Report 23 – Tanzanian Pastoralists Threatened: Evictions, Human Rights Violations and Loss of Livelihoods Published by: IWGIA with PINGO’s Forum, PAICODEO and UCRT Number of pages: 92 ISBN: 978-87-92786-66-1 Language: English Index: 1. Indigenous peoples – 2. Human rights – 3. Pastoralism Geographical area: East Africa Date of publication: 2016 This report has been prepared and published with financial support from the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DANIDA) PINGO’s forum P.O. Box 14437 – Arusha – Tanzania Web: www.pingosforum.or.tz PAICODEO P.O.BOX 894 – Morogoro – Tanzania Email: [email protected] UJAMAA COMMUNITY RESOURCE TEAM P.O.Box 15111 – Arusha – Tanzania Web: www.ujamaa-crt.org INTERNATIONAL WORK GROUP FOR INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS Classensgade 11 E, DK 2100 - Copenhagen, Denmark Tel: (+45) 35 27 05 00 - E-mail: [email protected] - Web: www.iwgia.org ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IWGIA gratefully acknowledges PINGO’s Forum, PAICODEO, and UCRT for recognising and acting on the need to produce this report; the organisations and their staff are also acknowl- edged for generously contributing their in-depth knowledge on the detail and context of pas- toralist evictions and land conflicts in Tanzania. Field work was facilitated with assistance from UCRT and PAICODEO, who ensured that the communities affected by evictions and land conflicts were informed of the purpose of this report and thereby confident to provide the information that has been used in the report. Grateful acknowledgement is also made of the contributions made by courageous pastoralist men and women, their customary leaders and their village government leaders; the candid and detailed information they gave provides the narrative of this report, confirming media and other reports made at the time of the evictions and allowing the voice of the affected communities to be represented. Discussions with religious leaders, district councillors and pastoralist MPs provided further context and insights, affirming the narratives from pastoralists in the villages. IWGIA also thanks Carol Sørensen whose work with and knowledge of pastoralist issues has been crucial in pulling together the information provided by communities and other informants, and cor- roborating the information with existing documentation. Finally, editing provided by Diana Vinding has strengthened the report and her expertise is highly appreciated. It is hoped that the substantial col- laboration on producing this report will result in justice for the affected pastoralist men and women, and improved land and legal rights for pastoralist communities in Tanzania. CONTENTS List of abbreviations and acronyms ............................................................................................................................................8 Executive summary .....................................................................................................................................................................10 CHAPTER 1 – Introduction and overview of the study 1.1 Background .....................................................................................................................................................................18 1.2 How the review was conducted .......................................................................................................................................18 1.3 Overview of the study report ...........................................................................................................................................19 CHAPTER 2 – The context of recent pastoralist evictions 2.1 Pastoralist land use .........................................................................................................................................................20 2.2 Emerging land conflicts ...................................................................................................................................................21 2.3 The legal framework ........................................................................................................................................................22 2.3 Justifications for evicting pastoralists ..............................................................................................................................24 2.4 Main trends .....................................................................................................................................................................24 CHAPTER 3 – Pastoralist evictions in Mbeya Region 3.1 Summary of findings .......................................................................................................................................................26 3.2 Land and water use .........................................................................................................................................................26 3.3 Outline of events .............................................................................................................................................................28 3.4 National Anti-Livestock Operation ...................................................................................................................................30 3.5 Iwalanji and Manawala narratives ...................................................................................................................................31 3.6 The aftermath ..................................................................................................................................................................32 3.6.1 Livestock production .........................................................................................................................................32 3.6.2 Changing tenure and boundaries ......................................................................................................................33 3.6.3 Continuing violations .........................................................................................................................................33 3.6.4 Struggling for rights ...........................................................................................................................................34 3.6.5 Increasing marginalisation ................................................................................................................................36 CHAPTER 4 – Pastoralist evictions over the past seven years in Morogoro Region 4.1 Summary of key findings .................................................................................................................................................38 4.2 Background and context .................................................................................................................................................38 4.3 Pastoralists evictions in Kilosa District in 2009 ...............................................................................................................40 4.3.1 How it began .....................................................................................................................................................40 4.3.2 Removing pastoralists from Kilosa ....................................................................................................................41 4.3.3 Human rights violations .....................................................................................................................................43 4.3.4 Responses to the evictions ...............................................................................................................................45 4.4 Kilombero Valley evictions ...............................................................................................................................................45 4.4.1 Kilombero Valley ...............................................................................................................................................45 4.4.2 The Ramsar site ................................................................................................................................................46 4.4.3 Operation Save Kilombero Valley .....................................................................................................................47 4.4.4 Carrying out the evictions .................................................................................................................................48 4.4.5 Human rights violations .....................................................................................................................................48 4.4.6 Responses to the evictions ...............................................................................................................................51
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USAID Tanzania Activity Briefer May 2020
    TANZANIA ACTIVITY BRIEFER MAY 2020 For over five decades, the United States has partnered with the people of Tanzania to advance shared development objectives. The goal of USAID assistance is to help the country achieve self- reliance by promoting a healthy, prosperous, democratic, well- governed, and secure Tanzania. Through partnerships and investments that save lives, reduce poverty, and strengthen democratic governance, USAID’s programs advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous Tanzania. In Tanzania, USAID engages in activities across four areas: ● Economic growth, including trade, agriculture, food security, and natural resource management ● Democracy, human rights, and governance ● Education ● Global health LARRIEUX/ USAID ALEX ALEX ECONOMIC GROWTH OVERVIEW: USAID supports Tanzania’s economic development and goal to become a self-reliant, middle- income country by 2025. We partner with the government and people of Tanzania, the private sector, and a range of development stakeholders. Agriculture plays a vital role in Tanzania’s economy, employing 65 percent of the workforce and contributing to nearly 30 percent of the economy. USAID strengthens the agriculture policy environment and works directly with actors along the production process to improve livelihoods and trade. At the same time, we strengthen the ability of rural communities to live healthy, productive lives through activities that improve 1 nutrition and provide access to clean water and better sanitation and hygiene. We also enhance the voices of youth and women in decision making by building leadership skills and access to assets, such as loans and land ownership rights. As Tanzania’s natural resources are the foundation for the country’s development, we work to protect globally important wildlife, remarkable ecosystems, and extraordinary natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Mkoa Wa Arusha Halmashauri Ya Wilaya Ya Ngorongoro Wanafunzi Waliochaguliwa Kujiunga Na Kidato Cha Kwanza 2021
    MKOA WA ARUSHA HALMASHAURI YA WILAYA YA NGORONGORO WANAFUNZI WALIOCHAGULIWA KUJIUNGA NA KIDATO CHA KWANZA 2021 C: SHULE ZA SEKONDARI ZA KUTWA/HOSTEL SHULE YA SEKONDARI ARASH I:WAVULANA NAMBA YA SHULE NA JINA LA MTAHINIWA SHULE ATOKAYO DARAJA PREMS AENDAYO 1 20141524943 OLOWASSA KOPIRATO NANGIRIA ENG/SAMBU ARASH A 2 20141524934 KOISIKIRI PANIANI MUTEL ENG/SAMBU ARASH A 3 20141524938 MORANI LAZARO JARTAN ENG/SAMBU ARASH A 4 20141612507 WACHINGA LEMANGI NG'EYDASHEG OLPIRO ARASH A 5 20141524945 TAGEI ROKOBE MUSSA ENG/SAMBU ARASH A 6 20141612495 GIDASHI JERUMAN BALAWA OLPIRO ARASH A 7 20141612493 GIDABARDEDA GULENDE GIDAGUJONJODA OLPIRO ARASH B 8 20141556147 SAITOTI JOSEPH MBOTOONY ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 9 20141568040 KAJEFU JOHN KWABE MAGERI ARASH B 10 20141612502 GIYONGI LEMANGI NG'EYDASHEG OLPIRO ARASH B 11 20141568041 KASUBENI KANARI SUGENYA MAGERI ARASH B 12 20141612497 GISAGHAN GITAMBODA NENAGI OLPIRO ARASH B 13 20141524937 LEMAYANI NDEREREI KEREKU ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 14 20141524932 ERICK INOSENTI KIMWAI ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 15 20141524941 OLOINYAKWA KIARO MOTI ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 16 20141568039 JULIUS KANARI SUGENYA MAGERI ARASH B 17 20141556145 SABORE MURIANGA MASHATI NG'ARWA ARASH B 18 20141612499 GITARAN GWAYDESH GISHING'ADEDA OLPIRO ARASH B 19 20141524939 NDOLEI SALONIKI SEREKA ENG/SAMBU ARASH B 20 20141350416 OLAIS LESKARI MOLLEL OLBALBAL ARASH B 21 20141623101 SAGUYA WILLIAM KASINIA MASUSU ARASH B 22 20141232035 EMANUEL FAUSTINI GWANDU OLBALBAL ARASH B 23 20141637008 PASCAL JACOB DOODOSI OLBALBAL ARASH B 24 20141524936 KUMOMALI SANDETWA SILOMA
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park
    Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Incorporating a Socio-Economic Monitoring Plan for 29 Villages North and East of the Udzungwa Mountains National Park Paul Harrison November 2006 WORLD WIDE FUND FOR NATURE TANZANIA PROGRAMME OFFICE (WWF-TPO) WITH SUPPORT FROM WWF NORWAY AND NORAD Socio-Economic Baseline Survey of Villages Adjacent to the Vidunda Catchment Area, Bordering Udzungwa Mountains National Park Report compiled by Paul Harrison, Kilimanyika Produced on behalf of WWF Tanzania Programme Office, P. O. Box 63117, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Co-Financed by NORAD and WWF Norway All photographs © Kilimanyika, unless otherwise stated. A series of photographs accompanying this report may be obtained by contacting Kilimanyika The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of WWF Tanzania, WWF Norway or NORAD. Bankipore House High Street Brill, Bucks HP18 9ST, UK Tel. +44 7739 803 704 Email: [email protected] Web: www.kilimanyika.com 2 Paul Harrison/Kilimanyika for WWF Tanzania Table of Contents Tables and Figures..............................................................................................................................................4 Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................................................5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile
    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ‟s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Safeguard: Free Prior and Informed Consultation of Indigenous Peoples
    Proposal to CEPF: (“Lodge Development at the Ngorongoro Rim”, Indigenous Heartland Organization, Tanzania) Free Prior and Informed Consultation of Indigenous Peoples Background to Project Since when have you been working in the area? What has been achieved so far? Who are living in the area? Which Indigenous People are present? How many? What is their status, means of livelihoods, and what is the relation between your project and these Indigenous People? IHO is the indigenous Led conservation organization formed and managed by the Maasai council of traditional leaders in the Ngorongoro conservation area of Tanzania. IHO has been working in the area for ever since inception, 8 years now. Tribal people/ Indigenous communities who live with the Ngorongoro conservation area are largely the Maasai who constitutes 98 % and a minority population of Hunnter gathers and Barbaig pastoralists. Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA) covers an area of 8, 292 sq. km in Northern Tanzania. Administratively it falls within Ngorongoro District in Arusha region, occupying approximately 60 % of the area of the whole district. Besides its varied, important collection of wildlife, its beautiful landscape and its archaeological sites, the area is home to over 80,000 Indigenous Maasai pastoralists, almost 60% of the total population of the district. The area Constitutes the Ngorongoro Divison (Tarafa) of the Ngorongoro District and has eleven Wards (Kata) and a number villages registered under the local Government District Act, 1982 (No. 7 of 1982). The NGO acting on behalf of this community is The Indigenous Heartland Organization (IHO), which is formed and governed by the Indigenous Maasai of Ngorongoro.
    [Show full text]
  • Mbulu District Council
    MTSP MBULU DISTRICT COUNCIL TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1 PREFACE Statement of the council chairman 2 Statement of the District Executive Director 3-4 CHAPTER 1 Introduction 6-7 CHAPTER 2 Summary of Council profile 8-14 CHAPTER 3 Vision, Mission core values and Objectives 15-16 CHAPTER 4 Strategies and Targets 17-25 CHAPTER 5 Result Framework 26-44 1 PREFACE STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON Mbulu District council was established in 1984. The present population as at December 2007 is 286,725 basing on the growth rate of 3.8 percent (3.8%). The Government of the United Republic of Tanzania, Local Government has laid down good foundations whereby peace and stability continue to be historical benchmarks. It is the responsibility for the Mbulu District Council to ensure that good government is adhered to sustain peace and stability. The Council faces a number of Socio-economic problems that need joint efforts from stakeholders to encounter them. The proposed strategic plan is aiming at supporting the improvement of the socio-economic conditions of Mbulu community, identifying and exploring effective investment opportunities for the Council, development partners, government, NGOs and Private sectors. The core activities which will be executed have been planned in accordance to Government guidelines as well as various Development strategies. The priorities have been derived from the Tanzania National development vision 2025, the millennia Development Goals 2015, the National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of poverty (NSGRP), CCM Election Manifesto October 2005 and Opportunities and Obstacles to Development approach. I hope the District Council staff will use the derived budget from the Strategic Plan according to the strategic plan guideline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Sweet Potatoes Cultivation in Gairo District in Morogoro Region
    Smallholder Commercialization and its Implication for Gender Relations in Tanzania: The Case of Sweet Potatoes Cultivation in Gairo District in Morogoro Region. A Research Paper presented by: Demokratus Mkandala. (Tanzania) in partial fulfilment of the requirements for obtaining the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Major: AGRARIAN, FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES (AFES) Members of the Examining Committee: Prof. Murat Arsel Dr. Tsegaye Moreda Shegro The Hague, The Netherlands December 2019 Disclaimer: This document represents part of the author’s study programme while at the Institute of Social Studies. The views stated therein are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Institute. Inquiries: Postal Address Institute of Social Studies P. O. Box 29776 2502 LT The Hague The Netherlands Location: Kortenarkade 12 2518AX The Hague The Netherlands Telephone: +31 70 426 0460 Fax: +31 70 426 0799 Table of Contents List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................... i List of Acronyms:............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ iv Chapter 1: .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile
    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ’s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Technical Note on Indigenous Peoples' Issues
    Country Technical Note on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues United Republic of Tanzania Country Technical Notes on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Submitted by: IWGIA Date: June 2012 Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IFAD concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The designations ‗developed‘ and ‗developing‘ countries are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. All rights reserved Acronyms and abbreviations ACHPR African Commission on Human and Peoples‘ Rights ASDS Agricultural Sector Development Strategy AU African Union AWF African Wildlife Fund CBO Community Based Organization CCM Chama Cha Mapinduzi (Party of the Revolution) CELEP Coalition of European Lobbies for Eastern African Pastoralism CPS Country Partnership Strategy (World Bank) COSOP Country Strategic Opportunities Paper (IFAD) CWIP Core Welfare Indicator Questionnaire DDC District Development Corporation FAO Food and Agricultural Organization FBO Faith Based Organization FGM Female Genital Mutilation FYDP Five Year Development Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Forms and Drivers of Conflicts Between Farmers and Pastoralists in Kilosa and Kiteto Districts, Tanzania
    Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A 8 (2018) 333-349 doi: 10.17265/2161-6256/2018.06.001 D DAVID PUBLISHING Forms and Drivers of Conflicts between Farmers and Pastoralists in Kilosa and Kiteto Districts, Tanzania Parit Luka Saruni1, Justin Kalisti Urassa2 and George Chamungwana Kajembe3 1. Department of Social Studies, Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy, P.O. Box 9193, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania 2. Department of Policy, Planning, and Management, College of Social Sciences and Humanities (CSSH), Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3024, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania 3. Department of Forest Resources Assessment and Management, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Tourism, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3013, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania Abstract: Farmer-pastoralist conflicts represent a significant challenge for rural communities and the Tanzanian government. The study objectives were to (i) determine existing forms of conflicts and (ii) identify drivers underlying resource use conflicts. The manuscript is based on a study that adopted a cross-sectional research design whereby data were collected from 373 randomly selected respondents from Kilosa and Kiteto districts, Tanzania, while primary data were collected through interviews, observations and focus group discussions, secondary data were gathered from government reports and newspapers. Quantitative data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0. Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out for quantitative data. Factor analysis was used to extract component factors on drivers and forms of conflicts, whereas content analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data. Generally, study results show that there were three main forms of conflict namely farmers versus pastoralists over village boundaries; farmers versus pastoralists over livestock routes and farmers versus farmers over the land.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Region Investment Profile
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COAST REGION INVESTMENT PROFILE JANUARY, 2015 a coast book.indd 1 10/16/14 5:23 AM b coast book.indd 2 10/16/14 5:23 AM UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COAST REGION INVESTMENT PROFILE JANUARY, 2015 i coast book.indd 3 10/16/14 5:23 AM ii coast book.indd 4 10/16/14 5:23 AM TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................... iii Abbreviations ....................................................................................iv COAST REGION: THE BEST DESTINATION FOR INVESTMENT.....vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................... ix THE REGIONAL PROFILE ............................................................1 1.0. REGIONAL DESCRIPTION .....................................................1 1.1 Geographical Location and Surface area .............................1 1.2 Administrative units and Organization Structure ..............2 1.3 Population and Demographic Pattern ................................ 2 1.4 Climate, Soil and Topography.............................................. 2 2.0 ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES .........................................................5 2.1 FORMAL SECTOR ...................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Agriculture.......................................................................... 5 2.1. 2 Industries and Trade .........................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Baseline Study Report Vol. 2 Table of Contents Items Pages 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Study rationale and objective 4 2. Description of the study area 5 2.1. Location of the study areas 5 2.2. Institutional set-up 7 3. Literature review 8 3.1. Paradigm shift 8 4. Discussion of monitoring indicators 11 4.1. Identification 12 4.2. Measurement 13 5. Methodology 13 5.1. Data type and source 14 5.2. Primary data collection 14 5.2.1. Sampling methods 14 5.2.1.1. Data collection instruments 15 5.2.1.2. Key informants 16 5.3. Data analysis 17 5.3.1. Participatory rural appraisal (pra) 17 5.3.2. Structured surveyed 17 5.3.3. GIS data 17 6. Findings 17 6.1. Situation analysis 17 6.2. Level of development of wmas 21 6.3. Social aspects 22 6.3.1. Location and size: 22 6.3.2. Population 25 6.3.3. Natural resources: 30 6.3.4. Taboos and Rituals Related to Natural Resources Conservation 31 6.3.5. Village governments: 34 Wami-Mbiki WMA i Baseline Study Report Vol. 2 6.3.6. Village government office: 36 6.3.7. Existing community based organizations: 38 6.3.8. Knowledge of the wma concept: 40 6.3.9. Wildlife related court cases: 42 6.3.10. Collaboration with other stakeholders: 44 6.3.11. Social services 46 6.3.12. Community solidarity 52 6.4. Economic aspects 54 6.4..1. Economic services 54 6.4.2.
    [Show full text]